Oh, now this is just the proverbial cherry on the fishy cake in Arizona. The results of a mandatory recount in Pinal County, Arizona, are set to be released today, December 29th, showing “significant discrepancies” from the original vote. Results favoring the republican candidates [Details Here].
Then there’s this very interesting development….
“The results of the statutorily required recount in 3 races were expected to be released on December 22nd however, inexplicably, Secretary of State Katie Hobbs petitioned the courts to have the results go directly to her office and asked to postpone the release until December 29th.”
Apparently, in her role as Secretary of State Katie Hobbs filed a motion with the court to seal the final recount result until after the lawsuit filed in Maricopa County against her was concluded. That means the Lake team did not have the results of three recounts to use in court as evidence that something sketchy in Arizona had taken place.
It appears Mrs. Hobbs intentionally did not want the recount information coming out until her lawsuit to become governor was completed.
From reliable source in rural county – sizable # of votes found during recount. Net benefit to GOP candidates in the 100s possibly? Yikes! Maybe why recount results are being slow-walked by Hobbs? I’m not one for conspiracy stuff, but no process is perfect, so keep an eye on it!
— Constantin Querard (@CQuerard) December 28, 2022
Arizona – […] There were automatic recounts in the Attorney General’s race, Superintendent of Public Instruction race, and the Legislative District 13 (LD13) House race. Arizona law was recently changed, requiring automatic recounts if a candidate wins by a margin that is less than or equal to 0.5% of total votes cast.
The approximately 300 ballot discrepancy in Pinal County stems from a “system failure,” and is expected to favor Arizona Attorney General candidate Abe Hamadeh, a Republican who is only 511 votes away from the declared winner Democrat candidate Kris Mayes.
It is believed that the issue with Pinal’s tally was known before Hamadeh and gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake filed their separate election challenges in Arizona courts. If that is the case, then both candidates were denied information that could have changed their election challenges which focused only on the mismanagement in Maricopa County on Election Day. (read more)
Perhaps, just perhaps, this new revelation will assist Mrs. Lake in her appellate case.
Will any amount of evidence make a difference at this point?
It does seem as though the Arizona election was decided before the ballots were marked or counted. … We shall see what will occur.
GGHD:
Which could account for how well prepared Hobb’s legal team was. Said preparation in this kind of case takes a minimum of many months, according to one legal expert.
Thugfaced, Democrat Consigliere, Marc Elias, has decades of preparation for precisely this.
He looks like those guys in track suits who flogged pirated videos in the 80s.
A play on the Soviet saying?
“Show me the candidate and I’ll show you the winner!”
“My machines will “elect” any one you choose!”
“Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!”
you forgot the coup de grac “its not who gets the votes – its who counts the votes that determines the winner”
I can tell you that the Arizona Supreme Court if extremely conservative. If this “election” isn’t overturned – color me gone. we have a metric ton on info showing corruption. Just need an avenue of redress…
none of it will be deemed legally insignificant. Liddy lied in open court and the Plaintiff’s lawyers didn’t call it out. Not to mention a 2 day trial? What do you prove in 2 days? The fraud is deeper than the time they were given. It’s as if they were granted the trial to say you had your day in court. Sounds like 2020 without the day in court.
Missed comment… sorry
They were just going through the motions.
Exactly
I watched a bit of it…Painfully. The sound and production sucked.
Rich Barris was the witness. He was great.
The judge kept telling him to talk slower, so Ruth [sic], the court recorder could keep up with him.
Both sides were admonished for talking over each other and not waiting until the other person finished their question or answer. Because Ruth was getting confused?
At one point, the judge was leaning over with his hand on his forehead. He was either reading something intently, and not listening to the testimony? Or he was sleeping? It looked more like the later!
yet the same judge who denied she met the criteria also said the case has merit and needss to be appealed – all 10 counts can then be presented as well as other items that ahve surfaced
Kudos for being curious about what will happen!!!!
Those who are genuinely curious are more likely to stay engaged and to stay tuned so they find out.
Fortunately, “any difference” includes much more than a particular court outcome in terms of ultimately winning.
Ultimately, the most important Court, is ‘the Court of Public Opinion’ which takes TIME to render its decisions, but from which there is no appeal.
And, if you think our enemy doesn’t appreciate this, you are mistaken.
SO MUCH of our enemies actions are expended in trying to manipulate PUBLIC OPINION, BECAUSE they understand its importance.
And ever since the escalator ride, they have been promulgating one false narrative after another, which gave them short term ‘gains’ in Public Opinion, but inevitably long term loss, as they lost credibility in the Court of Public Opinion.
Without credibility, they can NOT manipulate public Opinion.
They have been FORCED to make these “sacrifice plays” to try to ‘stem the bleeding” and that is NOT something you do, when you are “winning”.
They have engaged in INTIMIDATION.
From the persecution of PDJT and anyone associated with him, to J6, to all of the Candidates and their staffs that ran as MAGA in 2022, people have noted how “blatant” it is, and mistakenly ascribed such blatantness to CONFIDENCE in our enemy; it is NOT “confidence”, it is desperation.
Engaging in an act of intimidation only intimidates, if it is widely seen; they WANT us to see the mistreatment of the J6 prisoners, so WE will be intimidated.
They WANT everyone to see the intimidation/persecution of all associated with “Trump” so none will run ad MAGA candidates, and none will work for their campaigns.
They want the mistreatment of Rudy, Sidney etc. to intimidate lawyers, so none will represent MAGA in Legal court cases.
And ITS NOT WORKING.
The enemies quiver is nearly empty, they are running out of ammo, and only brute force is left, and while they have capacity for massive brute force, I don’t think it achieves their goals.
Our enemy IS NOT “winning”!
Yes they are winning. As long as they are in power they are free to do whatever they want. They no longer need our favor. Katie Hobbs is an excellent example. She’s a fraud. She knows she’s a fraud. She knows we know she’s a fraud. Does that stop her? Nope. Same with Joe Biden. He knows no one likes or respects him. Does that stop him from mandating we all take the jab or mask up? Does that force him to at least try to stop the influx of foreigners into our country? Nope and nope. He doesn’t care. His administration doesn’t care. They want public opinion because the people that approve become part of the army used silence and intimidate his opposition but now that he/she/they are in power, they couldn’t care less what we think of them.
We are not winning when Katie Hobbs certifies her own election and declares herself the winner even when it is clear her team cheated. We are not winning when the judge sets the bar so high it was impossible for Kari Lake to have the election disqualified. We are not winning when the judge only gave her one day and a small amount of ballots to examine before rushing through a 2-day show trial. That is not winning. The people of Arizona need to recall Katie Hobbs because no one in state government will lift a finger despite the obvious corruption. That is not winning.
These people have no soul. They do not care what we think of them as long as they are in power. When they are not in power they only PRETEND to care what we think until they can maneuver themselves into power.
None of your completely accurate assessment of how evil the enemy has been up to this moment, and obviously intends to keep on being, actually refutes Dutchman’s argument at all.
Dutch’s argument is that every inch of evil the enemy stretches to achieve is simply widening the awareness of how evil they are. A breaking point is inevitable on this trajectory.
It’s like inflation and the printing of the money. It looks oh so strong until all of a sudden, it collapses like the proverbial house of cards.
Dutch’s argument is that every inch of evil the enemy stretches to achieve is simply widening the awareness of how evil they are. A breaking point is inevitable on this trajectory.
================
Every Chinese citizen is aware how evil their government is. That hasn’t and won’t stop their government from being evil. The same is true here. Even if every America were aware of the evil our government is, it doesn’t change or stop their evil.
So yes, Scarlett, they are winning.
No, absolutely positivity not, the time and manner of elections were chosen by the state legislatures and they are content with how this works… If not they would have overhauled the laws after 2016, 18, or 20.
The courts are just going to look at that and second the outcome based on those laws.
“What difference, at this point, does it make?”
–Hillary Hobbs
Absolutely – it is called a recall effort which is already well on its way!
I hate to be the Debby Downer of the group, but I wanted to contribute to the discussion of things that are missing from this thread.
First, if you read what Sundance has posted, he is conflating two different things. It discusses hundreds of votes from Pinal county that favor the Republican candidates. Kari Lake’s lawsuit was based in Maricopa County and only in Maricopa County, so anything from Pinal County would be irrelevant to her case, as well as her appellate case. Even if they had this information before the trial concluded, the trial was limited to two issues (8 of the 10 were dismissed): chain of custody and tabulator/printer issues, both of which were not at issue in Pinal County.
Second, the number discussed in the article mentions hundreds of votes in favor of the Republican candidates, which would absolutely be critical in the AG race in which the candidates are separated by only 511 votes, but would not be close to enough to materially change the governors race.
I watched the whole trial from start to finish. Given the limited time Kari’s team had to be able to mount a case, I thought they did a decent job, but I did feel as though her lawyers fell flat a lot of the time. While I am not an attorney, I have watched a lot of trials and read a lot of the relevant court documents. The judge laid out the road map to get to a favorable ruling. The lawyers didn’t check off the boxes, plain and simple. They got close to or perhaps even proved intentionality on the printer/tabulator issue, but they didn’t illicit a name, which the judge said was required for a favorable ruling. If you watch their direct and then the next day cross of Jarrett, they get so close and then neglect to follow up with specific names of who could have done it. That was just very poor questioning and what ultimately lost the case, in my opinion.
I highly suggest folks look into Lawtubers videos on this case to fully understand the nuances of the law and the hurdles that Lake needed to overcome. Not to mention the biases of the judges involved (obviously). Law is very tricky indeed and if you don’t take the time to read and understand then you don’t truly understand the rulings when they come down.
Look, I wanted Kari to win and I think she absolutely would have won if it had not been for all the shenanigans that went on in Maricopa County on Election Day. Rich Barris has been harping on it since well before the 2022 general election and he was correct. If you wait to vote until Election Day, you seriously compromise your chances of this kind of nonsense happening. I think heads should roll for this kind of screw up, intentional (which I think it was) or not. It is a voter’s right to vote on Election Day, but we need to play fire with fire.
You are FLAT WRONG.
Go back and read a post by Mike Robinson, in yesterday’s article.
AZ Law deals with proving DOUBT in results due to improper execution of the election process and NOT INTENT by those running the process.
Criminal Intent is a separate issue and can be argued in parallel as part of the same case but proving INTENT is not required to overturn the election result … only proof that shows DOUBT in the results.
The Judge laid out a road map vs a legal standard that DOES NOT EXIST in AZ Law. By your own admission and even the Judges admission, Lake’s legal team actually MET that standard of casting DOUBT on the results.
The suppression of evidence by Hobs DOES bear on the case in Maricopa County.
It is actual evidence of pointing to pervasiveness of systemic errors as a supporting mitigating fact.
Further as to the separate issue of INTENT, this act goes to refute the Judges assertion vs his own Standard with mitigating related evidence.
One does not have to be an attorney to see the utterly flawed, nonexistent logic you apply.
I can see where Kari’s case against Maricopa County would not be affected if Maricopa was singled out in the complaint.
My question is why Kari’s attorneys, including Harmeet Dillon who was involved originally, did not know that mandatory recounts were required in other counties. Being only a lay person, I would think that certification of the winner could not be valid until those recounts were completed.
Also, at the moment, the judge added “malicious intent” to what the Plaintiff had to prove, the case should have gone to the appellate court to halt the judge’s addition of requirements not included in the law.
mandatory recounts are REQUIRED at the STATE level when the margin of victory is 0.5% or LESS….that is why they made sure to keep the Hobbs win at 0.6%….Dhillon should never be made the RNC chair as she lacks the fighting credentials….she talks a tough talk but when it comes time to fight she flees
there is a concept in law called spoilage where those that HIDE or DESTROY evidence have by doing so demonstrated their mens reas or guilty mind ……I do not know if this is included in jurisprudence in AZ but the idea is pretty common that the attempt to conceal shows proof of guilt
VAcon is actually right in what he’s saying. Where this falls to is the Arizona Legislature and it seems that everyone wants to ignore that.
The time and manor of elections were chosen… Including Hobbs involvement. If the legislature is happy the courts have zip to say about this.
Unless of course you’re going to argue that the constitution should simply be tossed.
This sounds like a “fair and balanced” foxxxxy report.
They always include some line like “Look, I wanted Kari to win …….BUT, BUT, BUT.”
The only two lines missing are: “I just want to play devil’s advocate…..” and “Don’t shoot the messenger….”
“Let’s go Brandon!”
I took VACon81’s post to be supplementary, pointing us to Lawtubers for more information. Quoting Baris is a plus, in my opinion.
And, right on queue, here comes the follow-up backup support poster…how can you tell?…..they criticize citizens who vote on election day………….
I liked the I’m not an attorney, but…..I slept at a Holiday Inn last night statement.
VACon81, thank you for watching all the trial material. Excellent points above – thank you. I’ll check out the Lawtubers.
Except, except Hobbs ran the whole bloody election and suppressed evidence until after the trial with Lake. Doubt! That’s what that amounts to and Hobbs is a dirty piece of garbage.
until the judge sees evidence that his life will drastically take a turn for the worst his rulings will not change no matter how much evidence. Chicago politics people, it’s who is running this show. That mess in Chicago breeds criminals and they now are loosed on our country because we have no law enforcement, just like Chicago.
Hiding evidence detrimental to her case?
Sounds like obstruction of justice to me.
Seems like Hobbs is also guilty of dereliction of her duty as Secretary of State.
it is proof of a guilty mind
I also like what the protagonist of Legally Blonde called mens rea:
A vicious will.
The entire AZ McCain-Election-Fraud Machine is indeed vicious and willful.
“Obstruction of justice? Like, with a cloth?”
–Hillary Hobbs.
Send Peppermint to visit the judge.
More corrupt politics in Arizona. What a surprise.
“If you wait to vote until Election Day, you seriously compromise your chances of this kind of nonsense happening.”
It is absurd to argue that it is wrong to vote on Election Day.
This is a rationalization and buys into the propaganda put forth by the unethical Katie Hobbs and her mindless/corrupt followers.
I was committed to attend a Christmas party in Phoenix populated with Hobbs-voting democrats. I took all the cash and credit cards out of my purse in advance because I thought if they would steal an election in such an unethical manner and justify and rationalize it, what would they do with my purse left on the bed in a bedroom? I have lost all respect for anyone who supports Katie Hobbs.
A thief is a thief is a thief. “Thou shall not steal.”
Maybe don’t go to the party.
Using their lawyer logic, Jazzbogie should attend the party a week early and not wait until the day of the party.
I too am “not a lawyer” and so maybe my observations are naive. But cheating is cheating no matter how slimily it is wrapped up in vague wording like “system failure”, or, ugh! “sealing recounts,” etc.
If the recount information had been released when it should have been- instead of being repressed by one of the defendants (and why was that allowed to happen in the first place???) – then maybe some of Ms. Lake’s other original charges, that were cancelled by the judge, would have had to be re-instated and the whole can of worms could have been made public and examined more thoroughly. And all this makes one wonder how much other necessary information has been repressed….
Hmmm…. perhaps I used the wrong word above. Suppressed instead of repressed. I get those two mixed up sometimes…
Robert Gouveia Esq. is an Arizona attorney and has been doing a good job of reviewing the Kari Lake vs Maricopa county lawsuit each day and his explanation of the boxes the Lake attorneys needed to check agrees with your comment points so would be the one I would recommend to look up if people are so inclined to follow ‘lawtubers’.
The discrepancy between the day 1 and day 2 testimony of the witness for Maricopa county, Jarrett(?, name escapes me), left the door wide open for Lake’s attorneys to get the specifics the Judge laid out as to who changed the settings on the printer, when were those changes made, if an update was made on one polling place printer (being connected by specific to voting machine setting wifi system capability) did that automatically change the settings for the other (connected) polling place machines, etc., etc. type questions – which would have given Lake’s team the answers the judge was demanding;
and her lawyers simply and I suspect, purposely, walked on past and changed the topic to other unrelated to specifics questionings.
This is why I wonder who was paying for Lake’s attorneys, the RNC?
here is his recap of the day 2 testimony (it’s 2 hours) and like his approach, as far as lawtuber’s go, because he waits until the entire day’s testimony is over and shows the viewers, through the eyes of an attorney working in Arizona, the various legal points he sees:
Kari did win.
There should be nothing BUT Same-Day Voting.
Hobbs “elected” herself, with the Maricopa Commissioners and the FBI.
Malachi 3:5
5 “Then I will draw near to you for judgment. I will be a swift witness against the sorcerers, against the adulterers, against those who swear falsely, against those who oppress the hired worker in his wages, the widow and the fatherless, against those who thrust aside the sojourner, and do not fear me,” says the Lord of hosts.
Amen!
I guess I’m just too stupid to understand that voter suppression on election day (which it was) is only a crime in certain situations.
Silly me for thinking that all judges and lawyas are biased and corrupt, and are the pharasees of the modern era.
The second amendment is about 2 sentences long, yet a lawya can write a 40 page argument showing that the 2A allows the confiscation of firearms by the govt.
It’s the 99% of lawyas that give the 1% a bad name. I don’t think I’ll waste my time with lawtubers, as much as I would waste my time with watching law and order. It’s all just theatrics anyway basing arguments on prior multiple rulings, and every lawya is right while common sense takes a far back seat.
the US is populated with the highest per capita population of lawyers in the world….we are awash in them looking for ways to create mischief
ORIGINAL 13th Amendment tried to deal with this issue, preemptively.
Lawyers have the Judiciary tied up. They should be BANNED from the other two branches.
Though honestly, the Supreme Court does not list having been an attorney as a prerequisite for service as a justice
Once upon a time one could become a lawyer without going to law school or having passed the BAR exam. This requirement has set up a gatekeeper which demands a particular viewpoint to enable success.
I’m going to add my voice to yours VACON81. I too watched the entire trial proceedings and read all the court documents as they were released through the courts website to try and gain a better understanding of the law regarding an election contest. If you read the court’s ruling on the 8 counts dismissed you’ll see just how poorly the complaint was written as it failed to make specific allegations of misconduct or name the individual responsible for that conduct. The bar was set only so high and they failed to meet even those minimum standards throughout the complaint. Cite the law being broken, name the perpetrator and then provide proof of the misconduct…seems a simple enough premise even to me.
Courts do not relish the idea of being involved in partisan politics, nor do they like the idea of overturning an election. To meet those demands you’re going to have prove misconduct or malfeasance on the part of election officials and Lake’s lawyers missed that critical point both in the original filing and during the trial.
I will disagree with one point in your post and that’s your assessment of Lake’s attorneys doing a decent job. Bryan Blehm was constantly being corrected by the judge to rephrase his questions while questioning his own witnesses. It was obvious he had little trial experience and was not up to the task at hand. When presented with the defense witnesses he failed time and again to elicit the correct responses and missed several opportunities to explore the inconsistencies in their testimony.
It was a pathetic display of situational awareness in a courtroom setting that ultimately led to their defeat and I lay the blame for that squarely on their poor performance.
while I can agree with most of your assessment the assumption for a court in the case of an election SHOULD be the state should have to PROVE propriety….just like the concept of “innocent until proven guilty” it is the DUTY of the state to run an honest, ethical election……. the evidence that this was not done should have to be shown to be false or in error NOT that we were unaware or it was a simple mistake
Is there a Lexington and Concord in Arizona? At some point the average guy who just wants to be left alone and expects things to be fair and just will come to the conclusion that he will have to set things right. The time for talk and ”dialogue” will have passed and the institutions that have become corrupted beyond redemption will have to be reset.
Savearizonafund.com Donate now to help all of our candidates who were cheated!!!!!
Went to the website but it appears it’s only to serve Kari, not Abe or Finchem’s legal battles.
If this is true, that a court delayed release at her request in order to subvert the outcome of both her legal case and the election, the judges involve can be disbarred. So too the lawyers that drafted the motion probably. They can also be sued directly.
Uniparty still steaming towards a train wreck in Arizona.
I still remember the one and only time stealing from a convenient store a bottle of visine eye drops.
That was 50 years ago and it wasn’t to make money it was because didn’t have any. No justification Katie . It was stealing, and I steal (still) remember.
A gallon of Visine wouldn’t clear the Uniparty’s vision. If only we could sprinkle them with Holy Water to cast out their demons.
They need to be sprayed with lead to cast out their demons, jmho.
Hey, she’s just part of the whole McCain crime family.
McCain machine is just the mechanics behind the process now…the MOTIVATION is Soros
Show me a person wearing those stupid horn-rimmed and/or tortoise-shell glasses who is not some form of degenerate…
I’m serious. It’s not causal but its correlated. Strongly. They use them to signal though I’m not even sure the wearers are aware of it.
meh: I agree. It’s the same as scarf wearing, nose piercing and hair dyed with Cool-Aid. Signs of psychological issues.
Hobbs should have recused herself and office from the election process.
Going forward, that should be the standard.
by AZ law she was REQUIRED to do so
Since when does the law mean squat? Laws are only for the little people. Rules are meant to be broken.
Know your place……..citizen. /
Kennedy vs. Nixon?
That was a “real” election.
You are remembering what was visible- not necessarily what was actual.
Tammany Hall in NYC had fraudulent elections in the 1840s
From Twitterland last night (Wednesday):
“I am hearing there will be a significant discrepancy in favor of Abraham Hamadeh in the recount results under seal until tomorrow morning. I’m told that the discrepancy will bring the race much closer. Discrepancy is not from Maricopa or Pima. “
Election cases cannot be won if the politicians in power are able to “vote” for sleeper voters and keep non-existent voters on the rolls.
I’m very excited about the fractal program that can instantaneously search all public records and find out addresses that don’t exist, 300 people living in a single family dwelling, dead people at the graveyard and people who live someplace out of state.
Clean voter roles are step one.
But, when turnout is 62%, there are opportunities to print ballots and fabricate mailed in ballots.
Maricopa deviated materially from the election law.
Using a Printing Company to receive and sort ballots. Using non-standard paper that wasn’t the size of Arizona ballots. Heck, the Election Secretary said the printers were adjusted election morning. How obvious can you get on the issue of intent. Shrink to fit, my butt.
Until the National guard counts the votes in large cities, I’m in the choir that sings “ye shall cheat again, slum lords”
This entire system has exhausted itself. It worked when the nation was a tenth of its size and Marxism was on the other side of the world. I’m not claiming to have a replacement in hand but this crap is tedious. It’s not going to improve short of strategic and convincing resistance. But no one wants to initiate it as the cabal has the legal and technical infrastructure and will easily stop them. Where is that asteroid anyway?
It’s not due ’till April 13, 2029.
This is a simple replacement for our corrupt system, not novel:
-One day voting
-ID required
-paper ballots only
NO MACHINES
.
As to that ‘fabricate mailed in ballots’ remark:
Ballots were MAILED OUT to supposed bona-fide registered voters with out of date address changes, name changes, or other ‘mailing anomalies’ which results in those MAILED OUT ballots being ‘returned to sender’.
So what did the ‘sender’ do with THOSE BALLOTS?
The properly registered voter got the MAILED OUT ballot and timely returned it, but what happened to any ballot ‘in their name’ which was sent to a ‘bad address’?
If a voter’s LEGAL ballot is presented with a contradiction (another ballot improperly attributed to that individual voter), which ballot got ‘counted’?
The MAILED OUT ballots were ALL HANDLED by USPS employees (who serendipitously were NOT MANDATED to take the jab by Bribem) and those postal workers KNOW that some of those handled ballots were fraudulently addressed!
Could it be that the USPS is facilitating treason in this country? If any of those mail carriers had an ounce of integrity, the whistleblowers should be fast and furiously inundating that Constitutionally created agency’s OWN INVESTIGATIVE UNIT with reports of election interference . . .
Stop mail-in voting. Just stop it. If you cannot get to the polls on Election Day, use absentee ballots.
At this point if the citizens of Arizona don’t bother to stand up for their own votes and the integrity of their elections then they should be stuck with that potatohead for their governor. Why should Kari Lake be standing alone trying to make sure the conservative and Republican voters of Arizona do not disenfranchised. You can sure as hell bet that if even one demorat’s vote wasn’t counted, the entirety of law enforcement would be all over it.
Precisely. Brazil is setting the example. FOLLOW IT ARIZONA!!!
It is hard to imagine how pervasive this problem is, but our ruling class has always been FUBAR.
What’s even more FUBAR is the fact that decent citizens keep tolerating this criminal behavior, and that’s why the ruling class keeps screwing us, because we allow it. That is what needs to stop.
To stop them you have to kill people. You start first LTS.
True. Goes back to Kennedy v Nixon, at least, on a national level, far longer in many locals.
In 1948 “landslide” Lyndon Johnson defeated Coke Stevenson to run for US Senate in Texas. Years later a Johnson operative in Starr County admitted (see Means of Ascent by R. Caro) he had come up with the necessary ballots after the fact for LBJ to win. That’s how close we came to missing out on the Great Society.
Add Obstruction of Justice and Official Oppression to the Hobb Goblin criminal indictment
By “Katie Hobbs” we really mean Katie Hobbs in conjunction with Marc Elias and associates.
It’s kind of like we’re trying to break down the locked gate of a fortress with a battering ram. It looks like it’s going to be a long time and many, many repetitions before anything flies open, but every assault is important.
Just looking at Katie Hobbs makes the hair on my neck stand up. She reminds me of the whiny wine mom helicopter parents that live in my neighborhood. Our city council has been solid donk for decades.
Except I bet she is NOT a Mom.
Hobbs is a Democrat. Being corrupt is par for the course for these these people.
AKA OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE and EVIDENCE TAMPERING
Katie Hobbs has the IQ of a dehydrated amoeba laying in salt
I typically go with mentality of a dead woodchuck but if you don;t mind will be using this as well
What a shame that this reporting is being left up to Sundance, and there aren’t a hundred or so Arizona and national reporters all over this.
Court Stenographers, you mean.
Steve Bannon’s War Room podcast is all over this, too.
Here’s 9 Revelations From Kari Lake’s Arizona Lawsuit (substack.com)–Emerald Robinson:
“#1. There were hundreds of thouands of illegal ballots counted in Arizona’s midterm elections — in Maricopa County alone.
#2. Almost 60% of Maricopa County’s voting machines failed on Election Day —that’s not a statistic you’ll see reported in our corporate media.
#3. There is no way that 59% of Maricopa County’s voting machines stopped working on Election Day by accident — and one day after being tested
#4. Between November 9th and November 11th, Maricopa County suddenly discovered more than 25,000 additional ballots that needed to be counted. That’s suspicious because Katie Hobbs supposedly beat Kari Lake by 17,000 ballots — according to the certified results. …
Needless to say, Arizona’s midterm elections were an international embarrassment — and yet further proof that our constitutional republic has been replaced with a tyranny.”…….
Wow. God please help your people! Deliver us from this growing wickedness and corruption!
If Hamadeh can prevail that would be a major boon for Kari Lake. I hope he’s able to close the gap!
Hobbs is a fake, she doesn’t even look human. She looks like a pile of crap stacked as high as she is tall. Of course, she cheated, the recorder of the county has a PAC to defeat Lake, how can this be? His doing his job and running a PAC against a candidate he will be involved in counting and recording is a conflict of interest, in the simplest terms. Arizona is an absolute poop show.
.
AND while all this turmoil is going down in Maricopa County, he (Stephan Ritcher) is down in Panama . . . for a vacation?
he is in PANAMA CITY…..last I looked that is in FLORIDA
.
Wherever he is, he is derelict in his duty to perform election ‘recording’ functions . . .
If your political opponent won’t campaign, or debate, it is a sure sign that election fraud is imminent.
….and until the election process is addressed in each state, and the corrupt voting tabulators are eliminated, nothing will change.
Big surprise here…NOT!
Lake’s lawyers suck. They are horrible litigators and went too easy on the corrupt county election officials. She needs to replace them ASAP for her appeal. They don’t stand a chance against the Perkins-Coie/Elias team.
Hobbs is the ULTIMATE MAOcrat CRIMINAL who as secretary of state engineered MASSIVE ELECTION FRAUD for her own BENEFIT! She literally disenfranchised the entire state of Arizona in this FRAUDULENT ELECTION. Their VOTING RIGHTS were crushed. LAKE WON!
And another…
Truth on Fire! CannCon and Clay Parikh Join to Discuss Election Fraud
By ConservativeDaily
Published December 28, 2022
https://rumble.com/v22sq0o-truth-on-fire-canncon-and-clay-parikh-join-to-discuss-election-fraud.html
Hosted by Mr. Brave, Joe Oltman.
Great article SD! KH is corrupt to the core.
I wonder how much $oro$ paid Hobb$.
This might be dumb, but does the state recount only the race in question when doing a recount? Would Lakes money be better spent on a statewide recount?
.
I think there may be a strategy to the manner, method, and timing of all of these challenges . . .
SD: “Katie Hobbs is as corrupt as they come…”
“Go up and down the streets of
Jerusalem(Washington, DC). Look now and take note; search her squares. If you can find a single person, anyone who acts justly, anyone who seeks the truth, then I will forgive the city.”Jeremiah 5:1
I believe Bannon and Peter Navarro both live there.
Fair Elections is the only method to peaceably stop a
totalitarian or authoritarian government.
As a lay man, if the results show that Lake won, will that change any outcomes? Anyone?
Kari Lake should’ve declared herself the winner weeks ago and started using the “Gov elect” tag.
She should’ve given the honest, law-abiding folks of AZ – especially those in government and law enforcement – the opportunity to acknowledge her as the legitimate winner and follow her lead. That’s called “leading from the front.”
Instead, she played by the enemy’s rules and filed a lawsuit in a corrupt court, in front of a corrupt judge, seeking a permission slip.
SMDH.
If I was a cheater and I never faced any punishment would I ever stop cheating?
Two Maricopa County, Arizona people were sent to Runbeck as OBSERVERS.
Since these people were never questioned by the Judge to my knowledge. I can only speculate on what the conversation could have been like between the two observers.
Jack and Jill. Did you see 295,000 ballots go by Jill, I sure did Jack. You sure got real nice eyes their Jill. What are we supposed to do about that Gain Of Custody Paper, I don’t know. And those ballots added to the pile by Runbeck, I don’t know. But, I do know one thing. I am not going to argue with those government guards.
See the question: what happen to free and open elections?
.
Two ‘observers’ of the cheat in AZ:
Judge John Role
Maricopa County Attny Alister Adele
The Judge just happened to make the trial the shortest of its kind, probably in history…
From November 2020:
On Tuesday, Hobbs rejected a request from Arizona Senate President Karen Fann (R), who asked for an “independent analysis” of voting data to restore confidence among Arizonians. Hobbs promptly dismissed the request, asserting that there is “no ‘current controversy’ regarding elections in Arizona, outside of theories floated by those seeking to undermine our democratic process for political gain.”
Hobbs wrote:
Here is an archived version of the article, including picture of what this woman really looks like. https://archive.vn/hY38p
you must be ANCIENT….Dimm/commie/GOPe have been rigging elections for DECADES
To ask the questions is to answer them.
Hobbs wants hidden anything not supporting her claims to office.
It is the results which matter, not the process.
We find all this evidence of election malfeasance, questionable antics and perjury. But until someone actually gets consequences it doesn’t matter. These people are so rotten they don’t care if you know they’re rotten. I know they’re corrupt. Let me know when something is going to be done about it.
Sounds to me like the Arizona Legislature should have shored up their election laws. Funny how no one notices that not happening. But cheer the hell out of running over the constitution in post election court cases.
The “judge” received his legal advice from Marc Elias in the form of the abstract summary from Findley vs Sorenson 1929, which states:
2. ELECTIONS — VALIDITY OF ELECTION OF SCHOOL OFFICERS IS NOT AVOIDED BY HONEST MISTAKES OR OMISSIONS NOT AFFECTING RESULT, GENERAL STATUTES BEING ADVISORY.
The “judge” therefore set the bar for Lake’s team to prove “intent to change the election outcome” by Maricopa County Election officials.
The judge failed to read the actual text of the ruling:
The first is that general statutes directing the mode of proceeding by election officers are deemed advisory, so that strict compliance with their provisions is not indispensable to the validity of the proceedings themselves, and that honest mistakes or mere omissions on the part of the election officers, or irregularities in directory matters, even though gross, if not fraudulent, will not void an election, unless they affect the result, or at least render it uncertain
Abe picked up 231 votes which is 280 less than needed to win.
ELECTION RECOUNT: Judge reads recount for AZ AG office:
@krismayes
1,254,809
@AbrahamHamadeh
1,254,529 Kris Mayes has received highest votes for Attorney General candidate, judge says.
Evidence is no longer evidence and no longer matters. Anything that exposes the Left’s criminality is ignored or labeled ”disinformation”. This will not change until the ”we can vote our way out of this” myth is exposed.