Thesis: Begin with The End in Mind – The U.S. Government control over social media though DHS was going to surface eventually. The people who constructed the systems knew exposure would eventually come. Two CENSORSHIP lawsuits, one filed by Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai in 2020 [LINK], and another filed by Missouri Attorney General in May 2022 [STATE OF MISSOURI ET AL VERSUS JOSEPH R BIDEN JR ET AL], were going to push the relationship between DHS and social media into the public consciousness; mitigation efforts would be needed.
The timing of the Twitter purchase by Elon Musk, initially triggered via major stock purchase in April 2022, must be considered with the overlay of these two sunlight lawsuits. Regardless of who owned Twitter, the nature of DHS controlling a backdoor portal into the content of social media was going to surface – as it has been unfolding from the two referenced censorship lawsuits.
The Twitter Files represent a gateway of discovery into how government assisted creating “Oligarchical Systems.” Surveillance systems delivering mutual benefits called public-private partnerships were formed. Readers here are months ahead of where the arc of this story is destined. However, oligarchical beneficiaries will always defend the system against rogue oligarchs who become a threat.
There are major inconsistencies in the public narrative as it swirls around Elon Musk and Twitter.
How could a businessman, an entrepreneur like Elon Musk, spend $44 billion, that’s BILLION, on an enterprise without knowing the basic outline of how that enterprise was operating. In a world of financial due diligence, on a scale of this size, the contradictions do not make sense.
Yet if we are to take Elon Musk at his word, he had no idea that DHS operated a portal into the network. He also had no idea about James Baker working as Twitter legal counsel and carrying such a massive conflict of interest. Additionally, via his announcement last night, Musk had no idea that Perkins Coie was legally representing Twitter.
How does an owner/operator take ownership of an organization and not know these senior executive issues? Reconcile these questions, and we begin to reconcile a background of activity that Mr. Musk may not know about. The alternative explanation is much more nefarious and involves Musk as a willing participant.
Regardless, before going further I cannot emphasize this point enough. We cannot fight our way through these puzzling issues until we all approach the big questions from the same baseline, the root of what created the system.
Barack Obama and Eric Holder did not create a weaponized DOJ and FBI; the institutions were already weaponized by the Patriot Act. What Obama and Holder did was take the preexisting system and retool it, so the weapons of government only targeted one side of the political continuum.
This point is where many people understandably get confused.
Elevator Speech:
(1) The Patriot Act turned the intel surveillance radar from foreign searches for terrorists to domestic searches for terrorists.
(2) Obama/Biden then redefined what is a “terrorist” to include their political opposition.
DEEP DIVE:
Twitter is to the U.S. government as TikTok is to China. The overarching dynamic is the need to control public perceptions and opinions.
DHS has been in ever increasing control of Twitter since the public-private partnership was formed in 2011/2012. However, it’s not just Twitter. The same fundamental relationships are now at work within Google, Microsoft, YouTube, Instagram and Facebook.
With all the shiny things surfacing from the Twitter Files, few are looking at the origin of what the government is trying to keep hidden….
In the era shortly after 9/11 the DC national security apparatus, instructed by Vice President Dick Cheney, was constructed to preserve continuity of government and simultaneously view all Americans as potential threats. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) were created specifically for this purpose.
After 9/11/01 the electronic surveillance system that was originally created to monitor threats from abroad was retooled to monitor threats inside our country. That is when all of our electronic ‘metadata’ came under federal surveillance.
That inflection point, and the process that followed, was exactly what Edward Snowden tried to point out.
What Barack Obama and Eric Holder did with that new construct was refine the internal targeting mechanisms so that only their political opposition became the target of this new national security system.
The problems we face now as a country are directly an outcome of two very distinct points that were merged by Barack Obama. (1) The post 9/11 monitoring of electronic communication of American citizens; and (2) Obama’s team creating a fine-tuning knob that it focused on the politics of the targets. This is very important to understand as you dig deeper into this research outline.
Washington DC created the modern national security apparatus immediately and hurriedly after 9/11/01. The Department of Homeland Security came along in 2002, and within the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) was formed.
When President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder arrived a few years later, those newly formed institutions were viewed as opportunities to create a very specific national security apparatus that would focus almost exclusively against their political opposition.
The preexisting Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Dept of Justice (DOJ) were then repurposed to become two of the four pillars of the domestic national security apparatus: a domestic surveillance state. However, this new construct would have a targeting mechanism based on political ideology.
The DHS, ODNI, DOJ and FBI became the four pillars of this new institution. Atop these pillars is where you will find the Fourth Branch of Government.
We were not sleeping when this happened, we were wide awake. However, we were stunningly distracted by the economic collapse that was taking place in 2006 and 2007 when the engineers behind Obama started to assemble the design. By the time Obama took office in 2009, we sensed something profound was shifting, but we can only see exactly what shifted in the aftermath. The four pillars were put into place, and a new Fourth Branch of Government was quietly created.
As time passed, and the system operators became familiar with their new tools, technology allowed the tentacles of the system to reach out and touch us. That is when we first started to notice that something very disconcerting was happening. Those four pillars are the root of it, and if we take the time to understand how the Fourth Branch originated, questions about this current state of perpetual angst will start to make sense.
We pick up the expansive and weaponized intelligence system as it manifests after 9/11/01, and my goal is to highlight how the modern version of the total intelligence apparatus has metastasized into a Fourth Branch of Government. It is this superseding branch that now touches and influences every facet of our life. We The People are under surveillance.
If we take the modern construct, originating at the speed of technological change, we can also see how the oversight or “check/balance” in our system of government became functionally obsolescent.
After many years of granular research about the intelligence apparatus inside our government, in the summer of 2020 I visited Washington DC to ask specific questions. My goal was to go where the influence agents within government actually operate, and to discover the people deep inside the institutions no one elected, and few people pay attention to.
It was during this process when I discovered how information is purposefully put into containment silos; essentially a formal process to block the flow of information between agencies and between the original branches. While frustrating to discover, the silo effect was important because understanding the communication between networks leads to our ability to reconcile conflict between what we perceive and what’s actually taking place.
After days of research and meetings in DC during 2020; amid a town that was serendipitously shut down due to COVID-19; I found a letter slid under the door of my room in a nearly empty hotel with an introduction of sorts. The subsequent discussions were perhaps the most important. After many hours of specific questions and answers on specific examples, I realized why our nation is in this mess. That is when I discovered the fourth and superseding branch of government, the Intelligence Branch.
I am going to explain how the Intelligence Branch works: (1) to control every other branch of government; (2) how it functions as an entirely independent branch of government with no oversight; (3) how and why it was created to be independent from oversight; (4) what is the current mission of the IC Branch, and most importantly (5) who operates it.
The Intelligence Branch is an independent functioning branch of government, it is no longer a subsidiary set of agencies within the Executive Branch as most would think. To understand the Intelligence Branch, we need to drop the elementary school civics class lessons about three coequal branches of government and replace that outlook with the modern system that created itself.
The Intelligence Branch functions much like the State Dept, through a unique set of public-private partnerships that support it. Big Tech industry collaboration with intelligence operatives is part of that functioning, almost like an NGO. However, the process is much more important than most think. In this problematic perspective of a corrupt system of government, the process is the flaw – not the outcome.
There are people making decisions inside this little known, unregulated and out-of-control branch of government that impact every facet of our lives.
None of the people operating deep inside the Intelligence Branch were elected; and our elected representative House members genuinely do not know how the system works. I assert this position affirmatively because I have talked to House and Senate staffers, including the chiefs of staff for multiple House & Senate committee seats. They are not malicious people; however, they are genuinely clueless of things that happen outside their silo. That is part of the purpose of me explaining it, with examples, in full detail with sunlight.
We begin….
In April of 2016, the FBI launched a counterintelligence operation against presidential candidate Donald Trump. The questioning about that operation is what New York Representative Elise Stefanik cites in March of 2017, approximately 11 months later (First Two Minutes).
Things to note:
♦ Notice how FBI Director James Comey just matter-of-factly explains no one outside the DOJ was informed about the FBI operation. Why? Because that’s just the way things are done. His justification for unilateral operations was “because of the sensitivity of the matter“, totally ignoring any constitutional or regulatory framework for oversight; because, well, quite simply, there isn’t any. The intelligence apparatus inside the DOJ/FBI can, and does, operate based on their own independent determinations of authority.
♦ Notice also how FBI Director Comey shares his perspective that informing the National Security Council (NSC) is the equivalent of notifying the White House. The FBI leadership expressly believe they bear no responsibility to brief the Chief Executive. As long as they tell some unknown, unelected, bureaucratic entity inside the NSC, their unwritten responsibility to inform the top of their institutional silo is complete. If the IC wants to carve out the Oval Office, they simply plant information inside the NSC and, from their perspective, their civic responsibility to follow checks-and-balances is complete. This is an intentional construct.
♦ Notice how Comey obfuscates notification to the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), by avoiding the fact James Clapper was the DNI from outset of the counterintelligence operation throughout the remainder of Obama’s term. When I get deeper into the process, we will understand how the Intelligence Branch has intentionally used the creation of the DNI position (established post 9/11/01) as a method to avoid oversight, not enhance it. Keeping an oblivious doofus like James Clapper in position held strategic value [Doofus Reminder HERE].
That video of James Comey being questioned by Elise Stefanik was the first example given to me by someone who knew the background of everything that was taking place preceding that March 20, 2017, hearing. That FBI reference point is a key to understand how the Intelligence Branch operates with unilateral authority above Congress (legislative branch), above the White House (executive branch), and even above the court system (judicial branch).
Also, watch this short video of James Clapper, because it is likely many readers have forgotten, and likely even more readers have never seen it. Watch closely how then White House national security adviser John Brennan is responding in that video. This is before Brennan became CIA Director, this is when Brennan was helping Barack Obama put the pillars into place. WATCH:
[Sidebar: Every time I post this video it gets scrubbed from YouTube (example), so save it if you ever want to see it again.]
The video of James Clapper highlights how the ODNI position (created with good national security intention) ended up becoming the fulcrum for modern weaponization, and is now an office manipulated by agencies with a vested interest in retaining power. The Intelligence Branch holds power over the ODNI through their influence and partnership with the body that authorizes the power within it, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI).
Factually, the modern intelligence apparatus uses checks and balances in their favor. The checks create silos of proprietary information, classified information, vaults of information that work around oversight issues. The silos, which include the exploitation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA Court, or FISC) are part of the problem.
Ironically, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence was created in the aftermath of 9/11/01 expressly to eliminate the silos of information which they felt led to a domestic terrorist attack that could have been prevented. The ODNI was created specifically upon the recommendation of the 9/11 commission.
The intent was to create a central hub of intelligence information, inside the Executive Branch, where the CIA, NSA, DoD, DoS, and DIA could deposit their unique intelligence products and a repository would be created so that domestic intelligence operations, like the DOJ and FBI could access them when needed to analyze threats to the U.S. This, they hoped, would ensure the obvious flags missed in the 9/11 attacks would not be missed again.
However, the creation of the DNI office also created an unconstitutional surveillance system of the American people. The DNI office became the tool to take massive amounts of data and use it to target specific Americans. Weaponizing the DNI office for political targeting is now the purpose of the DNI office as it exists.
The illegal and unlawful nature of the surveillance creates a need for careful protection amid the group who operate in the shadows of electronic information and domestic surveillance. You will see how it was critical to install a person uniquely skilled in being an idiot, James Clapper, into that willfully blind role while intelligence operatives worked around the office to assemble the Intelligence Branch of Government.
• The last federal budget that flowed through the traditional budgetary process was signed into law in September of 2007 for fiscal year 2008 by George W. Bush. Every budget since then has been a fragmented process of continuing resolutions and individual spending bills.
Why does this matter? Because many people think defunding the Intelligence Community is a solution; it is not…. at least, not yet. Worse yet, the corrupt divisions deep inside the U.S. intelligence system can now fund themselves from multinational private sector partnerships (banks, corporations and foreign entities).
• When Democrats took over the House of Representatives in January 2007, they took office with a plan. Nancy Pelosi became Speaker, and Democrats controlled the Senate where Harry Reid was Majority Leader. Barack Obama was a junior senator from Illinois.
Pelosi and Reid intentionally did not advance a budget in 2008 (for fiscal year 2009) because their plan included installing Barack Obama (and all that came with him) with an open checkbook made even more lucrative by a worsening financial crisis and a process called baseline budgeting. Baseline budgeting means the prior fiscal year budget is accepted as the starting point for the next year budget. All previous expenditures are baked into the cake within baseline budgeting.
Massive bailouts preceded Obama’s installation due to U.S. economic collapse, and massive bailouts continued after his installation. This is the ‘never let a crisis go to waste’ aspect. TARP (Troubled Asset Recovery Program), auto bailouts (GM), and the massive stimulus spending bill, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA, ie. those shovel ready jobs) were all part of the non-budget spending. The federal reserve assisted with Quantitative Easing (QE1 and QE2) as congress passed various Porkulous spending bills further spending and replacing the formal budget process.
Note: There has never been a budget passed in the normal/traditional process since September of 2007.
• While Obama’s radical ‘transformation‘ was triggered across a broad range of government institutions, simultaneously spending on the U.S. military was cut, but spending on the intelligence apparatus expanded. We were all distracted by Obamacare, and the Republican Party wanted to keep us that way. However, in the background there was a process of transformation taking place that included very specific action by Eric Holder and targeted effort toward the newest executive agency the ODNI.
The people behind Obama, those same people now behind Joe Biden, knew from years of strategic planning that ‘radical transformation’ would require control over specific elements inside the U.S. government. Eric Holder played a key role in his position as U.S. Attorney General in the DOJ.
AG Holder recruited ideologically aligned political operatives who were aware of the larger institutional objectives. One of those objectives was weaponizing the DOJ-National Security Division (DOJ-NSD) a division inside the DOJ that had no inspector general oversight. For most people the DOJ-NSD weaponization surfaced with a hindsight awakening of the DOJ-NSD targeting candidate Donald Trump many years later. However, by then the Holder crew had executed almost eight full years of background work.
• The second larger Obama/Holder objective was control over the FBI. Why was that important? Because the FBI does the domestic investigative work on anyone who needs or holds a security clearance. The removal of security clearances could be used as a filter to further build the internal ideological army they were assembling. Additionally, with new power in the ODNI created as a downstream consequence of the Patriot Act, new protocols for U.S. security clearances were easy to justify.
Carefully selecting fellow ideological travelers was facilitated by this filtration within the security clearance process. How does that issue later manifest? Just look around at how politicized every intelligence agency has become, specifically including the FBI.
• At the exact same time this new background security clearance process was ongoing, again everyone distracted by the fight over Obamacare, inside the Department of State (Secretary Hillary Clinton) a political alignment making room for the next phase was being assembled. Names like Samantha Power, Susan Rice and Hillary Clinton were familiar on television while Lisa Monaco worked as a legal liaison between the Obama White House and Clinton State Department.
Through the Dept of State (DoS) the intelligence apparatus began working on their first steps to align Big Tech with a larger domestic institutional objective. Those of you who remember the “Arab Spring”, some say “Islamist Spring”, will remember it was triggered by Barack Obama’s speech in Cairo – his first foreign trip. The State Department worked with grassroots organizers (mostly Muslim Brotherhood) in Egypt, Syria, Bahrain, Qatar and Libya. Obama leaned heavily on the organizational network of Turkish President Recep Erdogan for contacts and support.
Why does this aspect matter to us? Well, you might remember how much effort the Obama administration put into recruiting Facebook and Twitter as resources for the various mideast rebellions the White House and DoS supported. This was the point of modern merge between the U.S. intelligence community and Big Tech social media.
In many ways, the coordinated political outcomes in Libya and Egypt were the beta test for the coordinated domestic political outcomes we saw in the 2020 U.S. presidential election. The U.S. intelligence community working with social media platforms and political operatives.
Overlaying all of that background activity was also a new alignment of the Obama-era intelligence apparatus with ideological federal “contractors“. Where does this contractor activity manifest? In the FISA Court opinion of Rosemary Collyer who cited the “interagency memorandum of understanding”, or MOU.
Hopefully, you can see a small part of how tentacled the system to organize/weaponize the intelligence apparatus was. None of this was accidental, all of this was by design, and the United States Senate was responsible for intentionally allowing most of this to take place. The tools the government used to monitor threats were now being used to monitor every American. WE THE PEOPLE were now the threat the national security system was monitoring.
That’s the 30,000/ft level backdrop history of what was happening as the modern IC was created. Next, we will go into how all these various intelligence networks began working in unison and how they currently control all of the other DC institutions under them; including how they can carve out the President from knowing their activity.
♦ When Barack Obama was installed in January 2009, the Democrats held a 60-seat majority in the U.S. Senate. As the people behind the Obama installation began executing their longer-term plan, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence was a tool to create the Intelligence Branch; it was not an unintentional series of events.
When Obama was installed, Dianne Feinstein was the Chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI), and Democrat operative Dan Jones was her lead staffer. Feinstein was completely controlled by those around her including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. The CIA was in the process of turning over personnel following the Bush era, and as a result of a massive multi-year narrative of diminished credibility (Iraq WMD), a deep purge was underway. Obama/Holder were in the process of shifting intelligence alignment and the intensely political Democrat Leader Harry Reid was a key participant.
THE TRAP – Many people say that Congress is the solution to eliminating the Fourth and superseding Branch of Government, the Intelligence Branch. This is an exercise in futility because the Legislative Branch, specifically the SSCI, facilitated the creation of the Intelligence Branch. The SSCI cannot put the genie they created back in the bottle without admitting they too are corrupt; and the background story of their corruption is way too intense to be exposed now.
Every member of the SSCI is compromised in some controlling manner. Those Senators who disliked the control over them; specifically disliked because the risk of sunlight was tenuous and, well, possible; have either left completely or stepped down from the committee. None of the SSCI members past or present would ever contemplate saying openly what their tenure involved.
[Note: You might remember when Vice Chairman Mark Warner’s text messages surfaced, there was a controlled Republican SSCI member who came to his defense in February of 2018. It was not accidental that exact Senator later became the chair of the SSCI himself. That Republican Senator is Marco Rubio, now vice-chair since the Senate re-flipped back to the optics of Democrat control in 2021.]
All of President Obama’s 2009 intelligence appointments required confirmation from the Senate. The nominees had to first pass through the Democrat controlled SSCI, and then to a full Senate vote where Democrats held a 60-vote majority. Essentially, Obama got everyone he wanted in place easily. Rahm Emmanuel was Obama’s Chief of Staff, and Valerie Jarrett was Senior Advisor.
Tim Geithner was Treasury Secretary in 2010 when the joint DOJ/FBI and IRS operation to target the Tea Party took place after the midterm “shellacking” caused by the Obamacare backlash. Mitch McConnell was Minority Leader in the Senate but supported the targeting of the Tea Party as his Senate colleagues were getting primaried by an angry and effective grassroots campaign. McConnell’s friend, Senator Bob Bennett, getting beaten in Utah was the final straw.
Dirty Harry and Mitch McConnell saw the TEA Party through the same prism. The TEA Party took Kennedy’s seat in Massachusetts (Scott Brown); Sharon Angle was about to take out Harry Reid in Nevada; Arlen Spector was taken down in Pennsylvania; Senator Robert Byrd died; Senator Lisa Murkowski lost her primary to Joe Miller in Alaska; McConnell’s nominee Mike Castle lost to Christine O’Donnell in Delaware; Rand Paul won in Kentucky. This is the background. The peasants were revolting…. and visibly angry Mitch McConnell desperately made a deal with the devil to protect himself.
In many ways, the TEA Party movement was/is very similar to the MAGA movement. The difference in 2010 was the absence of a head of the movement, in 2015 Donald Trump became that head figure who benefited from the TEA Party energy. Trump came into office in 2017 with the same congressional opposition as the successful TEA Party candidates in 2011.
Republicans took control of the Senate following the 2014 mid-terms. Republicans took control of the SSCI in January 2015. Senator Richard Burr became chairman of the SSCI, and Dianne Feinstein shifted to Vice-Chair. Dirty Harry Reid left the Senate, and Mitch McConnell took power again.
Republicans were in control of the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2015 when the Intelligence Branch operation against candidate Donald Trump was underway. [Feinstein’s staffer, Dan Jones, left the SSCI so he could act as a liaison and political operative between private-sector efforts (Fusion GPS, Chris Steele) and the SSCI.] The SSCI was a participant in that Fusion GPS/Chris Steele operation, and as a direct consequence Republicans were inherently tied to the problem with President Trump taking office in January of 2017. Indiana Republican Senator Dan Coats was a member of the SSCI.
Bottom line…. When it came to the intelligence system targeting Donald Trump during the 2015/2016 primary, the GOP was just as much at risk as their Democrat counterparts.
When Trump unexpectedly won the 2016 election, the SSCI was shocked more than most. They knew countermeasures would need to be deployed to protect themselves from any exposure of their prior intelligence conduct. Immediately Senator Dianne Feinstein stepped down from the SSCI, and Senator Mark Warner was elevated to Vice Chairman.
Indiana’s own Mike Pence, now Vice President, recommended fellow Hoosier, SSCI Senator Dan Coats, to become President Trump’s Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). [Apply hindsight here]
• To give an idea of the Intelligence Branch power dynamic, remind yourself how House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), Chairman Devin Nunes, tried to get access to the DOJ/FBI records of the FISA application used against the Trump campaign via Carter Page.
Remember, Devin Nunes only saw a portion of the FISA trail from his review of a Presidential Daily Brief (PDB) previously given to President Obama. Chairman Nunes had to review the PDB at the White House SCIF due to compartmented intelligence, another example of the silo benefit.
Remember the massive stonewalling and blocking of the DOJ/FBI toward Nunes? Remember the back-and-forth battle over declassification surrounding the Nunes memo?
Remember, after Nunes went directly to House Speaker Paul Ryan for help (didn’t get any), the DOJ only permitted two members from each party within the HPSCI to review the documents, and only at the DOJ offices of main justice?
Contrast that amount of House Intel Committee railroading by intelligence operatives in the DOJ, DOJ-NSD and FBI, with the simple request by Senate Intelligence Vice Chairman Mark Warner asking to see the Carter Page FISA application and immediately a copy being delivered to him on March 17th 2017.
Can you see which intelligence committee is aligned with the deepest part of the deep state?
Oh, how quickly we forget:
The contrast of ideological alignment between the House, Senate and Intelligence Branch is crystal clear when viewed through the prism of cooperation. You can see which legislative committee holds the power and support of the Intelligence Branch. The Senate Intel Committee facilitates the corrupt existence of the IC Branch, so the IC Branch only cooperates with the Senate Intel Committee. It really is that simple.
• The Intelligence Branch carefully selects its own members by controlling how security clearances are investigated and allowed (FBI). The Intelligence Branch also uses compartmentalization of intelligence as a way to keep each agency, and each downstream branch of government (executive, legislative and judicial), at arm’s length as a method to stop anyone from seeing the larger picture of their activity. I call this the “silo effect“, and it is done by design.
I have looked at stunned faces when I presented declassified silo product from one agency to the silo customers of another. You would be astonished at what they don’t know because it is not in their ‘silo’.
Through the advice and consent rules, the Intelligence Branch uses the SSCI to keep out people they consider dangerous to their ongoing operations. Any appointee to the intelligence community must first pass through the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, before they get a full Senate vote. If the SSCI rejects the candidate, they simply refuse to take up the nomination. The president is then blocked from that appointment. This is what happened with President Trump over and over again.
• Additionally, the Intelligence Branch protects itself, and its facilitating allies through the formal classification process. The Intelligence Branch gets to decide unilaterally what information will be released and what information will be kept secret. There is no entity outside the Intelligence Branch, and yes that includes the President of the United States, who can supersede the classification authority of the Intelligence Branch. {Go Deep} and {Go Deep} This is something 99.9% of the people on our side get totally and frustratingly wrong.
No one can declassify, or make public, anything the Intelligence Branch will not agree to. Doubt this? Ask Ric Grenell, John Ratcliffe, or even President Trump himself.
• The classification process is determined inside the Intelligence Branch, all by themselves. They get to choose what rank of classification exists on any work product they create; and they get to decide what the classification status is of any work product that is created by anyone else. The Intelligence Branch has full control over what is considered classified information and what is not. The Intelligence Branch defines what is a “national security interest” and what is not. A great technique for hiding fingerprints of corrupt and illegal activity.
[For familiar reference see the redactions to Lisa Page and Peter Strzok text messages. The Intelligence Branch does all redactions.]
• Similarly, the declassification process is a request by an agency, even a traditionally superior agency like the President of the United States, to the Intelligence Branch asking for them to release the information. The Intelligence Branch again holds full unilateral control.
If the head of the CIA refuses to comply with the declassification instruction of the President, what can the president do except fire him/her? {Again, GO DEEP} How does the President replace the non-compliant cabinet member? They have to go through the SSCI confirmation. See the problem?
Yes, there are ways to break up the Intelligence Branch, but they do not start with any congressional effort. As you can see above, the process is the flaw – not the solution. Most conservative pundits have their emphasis on the wrong syllable. Their cornerstone is false.
For their own self-preservation, the Intelligence Branch has been interfering in our elections for years. The way to tear this apart begins with STATE LEVEL election reform that blocks the Legislative Branch from coordinating with the Intelligence Branch.
The extreme federalism approach is critical and also explains why Joe Biden has instructed Attorney General Merrick Garland to use the full power of the DOJ to stop state level election reform efforts. The worry of successful state level election control is also why the Intelligence Branch now needs to support the federal takeover of elections.
Our elections have been usurped by the Intelligence Branch. Start with honest elections and we will see just how much Democrat AND Republican corruption is dependent on manipulated election results. Start at the state level. Start there…. everything else is downstream.
♦ COLLAPSED OVERSIGHT – The modern system to ‘check’ the Executive Branch was the creation of the legislative “Gang of Eight,” a legislative oversight mechanism intended to provide a bridge of oversight between the authority of the intelligence community within the Executive Branch.
The Go8 construct was designed to allow the President authority to carry out intelligence operations and provide the most sensitive notifications to a select group within Congress.
The Go8 oversight is directed to the position, not the person, and consists of: (1) The Speaker of the House; (2) The Minority Leader of the House; (3) The Chair of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, HPSCI; (4) The Ranking Member (minority) of the HPSCI; (5) The Leader of the Senate; (6) The Minority Leader of the Senate; (7) The Chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, SSCI; and finally (8) the Vice-Chair of the SSCI.
Example: When the Chief Executive (the President) initiates an intelligence operation on behalf of the United States, the President triggers a “finding memo.” In essence, the instruction to the intel agency or agencies to authorize a covert operation. When that process takes place, the Go8 are the first people notified. Depending on the sensitivity of the operation, sometimes the G08 are notified immediately after the operation is conducted. The notification can be a phone call or an in-person briefing.
Because of the sensitivity of their intelligence information, the Gang of Eight hold security clearances that permit them to receive and review all intelligence operations. The intelligence community are also responsible for briefing the Go8 with the same information they use to brief the President.
~ 2021 Gang of Eight ~
The Go8 design is intended to put intelligence oversight upon both political parties in Congress; it is designed that way by informing the minority leaders of both the House and Senate as well as the ranking minority members of the SSCI and HPSCI. Under the concept, the President cannot conduct an intelligence operation; and the intelligence community cannot carry out intelligence gathering operations without the majority and minority parties knowing about it.
The modern design of this oversight system was done to keep rogue and/or corrupt intelligence operations from happening. However, as we shared in the preview to this entire discussion, the process was usurped during the Obama era. {GO DEEP}
Former FBI Director James Comey openly admitted to Congress on March 20, 2017, that the FBI, FBI Counterintelligence Division, DOJ and DOJ-National Security Division, together with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and the CIA, had been conducting independent investigations of Donald Trump for over a year without informing the Go8. Comey justified the lack of informing Go8 oversight by saying, “because of the sensitivity of the matter.”
Stupidly, Congress never pressed James Comey on that issue. The arrogance was astounding, and the acceptance by Congress was infuriating. However, that specific example highlighted just how politically corrupt the system had become. In essence, Team Obama usurped the entire design of congressional oversight…. and Congress just brushed it off.
Keep in mind, Comey did not say the White House was unaware; in fact he said exactly the opposite, he said, “The White House was informed through the National Security Council,” (the NSC). The unavoidable implication and James Comey admission that everyone just brushed aside, was that President Obama’s National Security Advisor, Susan Rice, was informed of the intelligence operation(s) against Donald Trump. After all, the NSC reports to the National Security Advisor.
Does the January 20, 2017, Susan Rice memo look different now?
Again, no one saw the immediate issue. What Comey just described on that March Day in 2017 was the usurpation of the entire reason the Gang of Eight exists; to eliminate the potential for political weaponization of the Intelligence Community by the executive branch. The G08 notifications to the majority and minority are specifically designed to make sure what James Comey admitted to doing was never supposed to happen.
Team Obama carried out a political operation using the intelligence community and the checks-and-balances in the system were intentionally usurped. This is an indisputable fact.
Worse still, the entire legislative branch of Congress, which then specifically included the Republicans that now controlled the House and Senate, did nothing. They just ignored what was admitted. The usurpation was willfully ignored.
The mechanism of the G08 was bypassed without a twitch of condemnation or investigation…. because the common enemy was Donald Trump.
This example highlights the collapse of the system. Obama, the Executive Branch, collapsed the system by usurping the process; in essence the process became the bigger issue, and the lack of immediate Legislative Branch reaction became evidence of open acceptance. The outcomes of the usurpation played out over the next four years, Donald J. Trump was kneecapped and lost his presidency because of it. However, the bigger issue of the collapse still exists.
The downstream consequence of the Legislative Branch accepting the Executive Branch usurpation meant both intelligence committees were compromised. Additionally, the leadership of both the House and Senate were complicit. Think about this carefully. The Legislative Branch allowance of the intelligence usurpation meant the Legislative Branch was now subservient to the Intelligence Branch.
That’s where we are.
Right now.
That’s where we are.
Term-3 Obama is now back in the White House with Joe Biden.
NOTE: Former Obama National Security aide and counsel to the President, Lisa Monaco, is in her current position as Deputy Attorney General, specifically to make sure all of these revelations do not become a legal risk to Barack Obama and the people who created them. The SSCI confirmed Monaco for this purpose because the Senate is just as much at risk.
Term-1 and Term-2 Obama usurped the ‘check and balance‘ within the system and weaponized the intelligence apparatus. During Trump’s term that weaponization was covered up by a compliant congress, complicit senate intelligence committee, and not a single member of the oversight called it out. Now, Term-3 Obama steps back in to continue the cover up and continue the weaponization.
Hopefully, you can now see the scale of the problem that surrounds us with specific citation for what has taken place. What I just explained to you above is not conspiracy theory, it is admitted fact that anyone can look upon. Yet….
Have you seen this mentioned anywhere? Have you seen this called out by anyone in Congress? Have you seen anyone in media (ally or adversary) call this out? Have you seen any member of the Judicial Branch stand up and say wait, what is taking place is not okay? Have you seen a single candidate for elected office point this out? Have you seen anyone advising a candidate to point this out?
This is our current status. It is not deniable. The truth exists regardless of our comfort.
Not a single person in power will say openly what has taken place. They are scared of the Fourth Branch. The evidence of what has taken place is right there in front of our face. The words, actions and activities of those who participated in this process are not deniable, in fact most of it is on record.
There are only two members of the Gang of Eight who have existed in place from January 2007 (the real beginning of Obama’s term, two years before he took office when the Congress flipped). Only two members of the G08 have been consistently in place from January of 2007 to right now, today. All the others came and went, but two members of the Gang of Eight have been part of that failed and collapsed oversight throughout the past 15 years, Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell.
♦ TECHNOLOGY – On a global scale – the modern intelligence gathering networks are now dependent on data collection to execute their intelligence missions. In the digital age nations have been executing various methods to gather that data. Digital surveillance has replaced other methods of interception. Those surveillance efforts have resulted in a coalescing of regional data networks based on historic multi-national relationships.
We have a recent frame of reference for the “U.S. data collection network” within the NSA. Through the allied process the Five Eyes nations all rely on the NSA surveillance database (U.K, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and U.S.) The NSA database provides the digital baseline for intelligence operations in defense of our allies. The portals into the NSA database are essentially an assembly of allies in like-minded ideological connection to the United States.
Unfortunately, there have been some revelations about the NSA database being used to monitor our allies, like in the example of Germany and surveillance on Angela Merkel’s phone. As long as “the good guys” are operating honorably, allies of the United States can feel confident about having protection from the NSA surveillance of global digital data. We warn our friends if we detect something dangerous etc.
The U.S. has nodes on communication pipelines to intercept and extract data. We have also launched hundreds, perhaps thousands, of satellites to conduct surveillance and gather up data. All of this data is fed into the NSA database where it is monitored (presumably) as a national security mechanism, and in defense of our allies.
However, what about data collection or data networks that are outside the NSA database? What do our enemies do? The NSA database is just one intelligence operation of digital surveillance amid the entire world, and we do not allow access by adversaries we are monitoring. So what do they do? What do our allies do who might not trust the United States due to past inconsistencies, ie. the Middle East?
The answers to those questions highlight other data collection networks. So, a brief review of the major players is needed.
♦ CHINA – China operates their own database. They, like the NSA, scoop up data for their system. Like us, China launches satellites and deploys other electronic data collection methods to download into their database. This is why the issues of electronic devices manufactured in China becomes problematic. Part of the Chinese data collection system involves the use of spyware, hacking and extraction.
Issues with Chinese communication company Huawei take on an added dimension when you consider the goal of the Chinese government to conduct surveillance and assemble a network of data to compete with the United States via the NSA. Other Chinese methods of surveillance and data-collection are less subversive, as in the examples of TicTok and WeChat. These are Chinese social media companies that are scraping data just like the NSA scrapes data from Facebook, Twitter and other Silicon Valley tech companies. [ Remember, the Intelligence Branch is a public-private partnership. ]
♦ RUSSIA – It is very likely that Russia operates their own database. We know Russia launches satellites, just like China and the USA, for the same purposes. Russia is also very proficient at hacking into other databases and extracting information to store and utilize in their own network. The difference between the U.S., China and Russia is likely that Russia spends more time on the hacking aspect because they do not generate actual technology systems as rapidly as the U.S. and China.
The most recent database creation is an outcome of an ally having to take action because they cannot rely on the ideology of the United States remaining consistent, as the administrations ping-pong based on ideology.
♦ SAUDI ARABIA – Yes, in 2016 we discovered that Saudi Arabia was now operating their own intelligence data-gathering operation. It would make sense, given the nature of the Middle East and the constant fluctuations in political support from the United States. It is a lesson the allied Arab community and Gulf Cooperation Council learned quickly when President Obama went to Cairo in 2009 and launched the Islamist Spring (Arab Spring) upon them.
I have no doubt the creation of the Saudi intelligence network was specifically because the Obama administration started supporting radical Islamists within the Muslim Brotherhood and threw fuel on the fires of extremism all over the Arab world.
Think about it., What would you do if you were Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain, Kuwait, the UAE, Jordan, Oman or Yemen and you knew the United States could just trigger an internal uprising of al-Qaeda, ISIS and the political arm of the Muslim Brotherhood to seek your destruction?
Without a doubt, those urgent lessons from 2009, 2010, 2011 triggered the formation of the Arab Intelligence Network as a network to defend itself with consistency. They assembled the network and activated it in 2017 as pictured above.
♦ Israel – Along a similar outlook to the Arab network, no doubt Israel operates an independent data collection system as a method of protecting itself from ever-changing U.S. politics amid a region that is extremely hostile to its very existence. Like the others, Israel launches proprietary satellites, and we can be sure they use covert methods to gather electronic data just like the U.S. and China.
As we have recently seen in the Pegasus story, Israel creates spyware programs that are able to track and monitor cell phone communications of targets. The spyware would not work unless Israel had access to some network where the phone meta-data was actually stored. So yeah, it makes sense for Israel to operate an independent intelligence database.
♦ Summary: As we understand the United States Intelligence Branch of government as the superseding entity that controls the internal politics of our nation, we also must consider that multiple nations have the same issue. There are major intelligence networks around the world beside the NSA “Five-Eyes” database. China, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Israel all operate proprietary databases deploying the same tools and techniques for assembly.
The geopolitical conflict that has always existed has now shifted into a digital battle-space. The Intelligence Agencies from these regions are now operating as the backbone of the government that uses them and has become dependent on them. [<- Reread that].
Once you accept the digital-era intelligence apparatus of China, Russia, Saudi-Arabia, The United States and Israel, are now the primary national security mechanisms for stabilization of government; then you accept the importance of those intelligence operations.
Once you understand how foundational those modern intelligence operations have become for the stability and continuity of those governments…… then you begin to understand just how the United States intelligence community became more important than the government that created it.
From that point it is then critical to understand that domestic intelligence operations are underway to monitor the electronic communication of American citizens inside our own country. YOU are under surveillance. The parents who confront school boards are under surveillance. The political operatives inside the FBI are monitoring everyone who comes onto the radar, that is why the National School Boards Association asked the White House, then the DOJ, to have the FBI start targeting parents. Are things making sense now?
♦ Public Private Partnership – The modern Fourth Branch of Government is only possible because of a Public-Private partnership with the intelligence apparatus. You do not have to take my word for it, the partnership is so brazened they have made public admissions.
The biggest names in Big Tech announced in June their partnership with the Five Eyes intelligence network, ultimately controlled by the NSA, to: (1) monitor all activity in their platforms; (2) identify extremist content; (3) look for expressions of Domestic Violent Extremism (DVE); and then, (4) put the content details into a database where the Five Eyes intelligence agencies (U.K., U.S., Australia, Canada, New Zealand) can access it.
Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft are all partnering with the intelligence apparatus. It might be difficult to fathom how openly they admit this, but they do. Look at this sentence in the press release (emphasis mine):
[…] “The Group will use lists from intelligence-sharing group Five Eyes adding URLs and PDFs from more groups, including the Proud Boys, the Three Percenters and neo-Nazis.”
Think about that sentence structure very carefully. They are “adding to” the preexisting list…. admitting the group (aka Big Tech) already have access to the the intelligence-sharing database… and also admitting there is a preexisting list created by the Five Eyes consortium.
Obviously, who and what is defined as “extremist content” will be determined by the Big Tech insiders themselves. This provides a gateway, another plausible deniability aspect, to cover the Intelligence Branch from any oversight.
When the Intelligence Branch within government wants to conduct surveillance and monitor American citizens, they run up against problems due to the Constitution of the United States. They get around those legal limitations by sub-contracting the intelligence gathering, the actual data mining, and allowing outside parties (contractors) to have access to the central database.
The government cannot conduct electronic searches (4th amendment issue) without a warrant; however, private individuals can search and report back as long as they have access. What is being admitted is exactly that preexisting partnership. The difference is that Big Tech will flag the content from within their platforms, and now a secondary database filled with the extracted information will be provided openly for the Intelligence Branch to exploit.
The volume of metadata captured by the NSA has always been a problem because of the filters needed to make the targeting useful. There is a lot of noise in collecting all data that makes the parts you really want to identify more difficult to capture. This new admission puts a new massive filtration system in the metadata that circumvents any privacy protections for individuals.
Previously, the Intelligence Branch worked around the constitutional and unlawful search issue by using resources that were not in the United States. A domestic U.S. agency, working on behalf of the U.S. government, cannot listen on your calls without a warrant. However, if the U.S. agency sub-contracts to say a Canadian group, or foreign ally, the privacy invasion is no longer legally restricted by U.S. law.
What was announced in June 2021 is an alarming admission of a prior relationship along with open intent to define their domestic political opposition as extremists.
July 26 (Reuters) – A counterterrorism organization formed by some of the biggest U.S. tech companies including Facebook (FB.O) and Microsoft (MSFT.O) is significantly expanding the types of extremist content shared between firms in a key database, aiming to crack down on material from white supremacists and far-right militias, the group told Reuters.
Until now, the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism’s (GIFCT) database has focused on videos and images from terrorist groups on a United Nations list and so has largely consisted of content from Islamist extremist organizations such as Islamic State, al Qaeda and the Taliban.
Over the next few months, the group will add attacker manifestos – often shared by sympathizers after white supremacist violence – and other publications and links flagged by U.N. initiative Tech Against Terrorism. It will use lists from intelligence-sharing group Five Eyes, adding URLs and PDFs from more groups, including the Proud Boys, the Three Percenters and neo-Nazis.
The firms, which include Twitter (TWTR.N) and Alphabet Inc’s (GOOGL.O) YouTube, share “hashes,” unique numerical representations of original pieces of content that have been removed from their services. Other platforms use these to identify the same content on their own sites in order to review or remove it. (read more)
The influence of the Intelligence Branch now reaches into our lives, our personal lives.
[The Intercept] – […] Behind closed doors, and through pressure on private platforms, the U.S. government has used its power to try to shape online discourse. According to meeting minutes and other records appended to a lawsuit filed by Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt, a Republican who is also running for Senate, discussions have ranged from the scale and scope of government intervention in online discourse to the mechanics of streamlining takedown requests for false or intentionally misleading information.
“Platforms have got to get comfortable with gov’t. It’s really interesting how hesitant they remain,” Microsoft executive Matt Masterson, a former DHS official, texted Jen Easterly, a DHS director, in February.
In a March meeting, Laura Dehmlow, an FBI official, warned that the threat of subversive information on social media could undermine support for the U.S. government. Dehmlow, according to notes of the discussion attended by senior executives from Twitter and JPMorgan Chase, stressed that “we need a media infrastructure that is held accountable.” (read more)
In the decades before 9/11/01 the intelligence apparatus intersected with government, influenced government, and undoubtedly controlled many institutions with it. The legislative oversight function was weak and growing weaker, but it still existed and could have been used to keep the IC in check. However, after the events of 9/11/01, the short-sighted legislative reactions opened the door to allow the surveillance state to weaponize against domestic enemies.
[…] The extent to which the DHS initiatives affect Americans’ daily social feeds is unclear. During the 2020 election, the government flagged numerous posts as suspicious, many of which were then taken down, documents cited in the Missouri attorney general’s lawsuit disclosed. And a 2021 report by the Election Integrity Partnership at Stanford University found that of nearly 4,800 flagged items, technology platforms took action on 35 percent — either removing, labeling, or soft-blocking speech, meaning the users were only able to view content after bypassing a warning screen. The research was done “in consultation with CISA,” the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.
Prior to the 2020 election, tech companies including Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, Discord, Wikipedia, Microsoft, LinkedIn, and Verizon Media met on a monthly basis with the FBI, CISA, and other government representatives. According to NBC News, the meetings were part of an initiative, still ongoing, between the private sector and government to discuss how firms would handle misinformation during the election. (keep reading)
After the Patriot Act was triggered, not coincidentally only six weeks after 9/11, a slow and dangerous fuse was lit that ends with the intelligence apparatus being granted a massive amount of power. Simultaneously the mission of the intelligence community now encompassed monitoring domestic threats as defined by the people who operate the surveillance system.
The problem with assembled power is always what happens when a Machiavellian network takes control over that power and begins the process to weaponize the tools for their own malicious benefit. That is exactly what the network of President Barack Obama did.
The Obama network took pre-assembled intelligence weapons (we should never have allowed to be created) and turned those FBI, DOJ-NSD, DHS and ODNI weapons into political tools for his radical and fundamental change. The target was the essential fabric of our nation.
Ultimately, this corrupt political process gave power to create the Fourth Branch of Government, the Intelligence Branch and a massive nationwide surveillance state. From that perspective the fundamental change was successful.
This is the scale of corrupt political compromise on both sides of the DC dynamic that we are up against. Preserving this surveillance system, a public-private partnership, is also what removing Donald Trump was all about…. The targeting of President Trump in order to preserve the system, the system that was weaponized during the Obama administration, is what the actions of the DOJ, FBI and DHS are all about.
What would powerful people in DC do to stop the American people from finding this out?
A controlled 2020 election? An increased censorship in the aftermath? A raid on Mar-a-Lago?
…The need for control is a reaction to fear.
If only people understood how accurate this really is.
(1) The Patriot Act turned the intel surveillance radar from foreign searches for terrorists to domestic searches for terrorists.
(2) Obama/Biden then redefined what is a "terrorist" to include their political opposition. https://t.co/EW43WmpeaT
— TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) October 14, 2022
Support Ongoing CTH Research HERE
“Musk had no idea that Perkins Coie was legally representing Twitter.”
Isn’t Perkins Coie a portal to the FBI?
Didn’t former DOJ lawyer Michael Sussmann, later at Perkins Coie, have a portal there to the FBI? Didn’t James Baker…FBI/DOJ…testify against former colleague, Sussman, at the Durham Pretend Trial while he was attorney for Twitter? Didn’t Baker spend time at Brookings as did FBI paid informant Igor Danchenko….
The (only viable) solution is referenced in the article.
Or that it’s in their self-interest.
Sundance, you need to write a book … if this treason ever ends, which I don’t expect to outlive.
When Sundance was attacked with an effort to deplatform him, he went to considerable extra effort and expence, to insure with his new site/server arrangement, he would be able to migrate ALL of his archives, articles and comments.
His complete “body of work” is right there, already “published” for all to see, and memorialised for all time.
I am sure all of us would buy any book he cared to write, and pay good $ for a hardcopy.
Think how much you would pay, and then scroll up and hit “donate to CTH here”,..and by all means feel free to peruse the archives, theres LOTS if great material thats aged really well, in there.
What I want to know is HOW does the federal government get its foot in the door of state run elections? Through or via state legislators? Is it arm twisting?
Subterfuge, subversion, spies online, endless venues for corruption.
.
Via a quid pro quo with the USPO?
Deliver ballots, postal delivery person, even though you KNOW that ballot is not intended for a legitimate address of a citizen voter, and in exchange we (the federal government) will not mandate you get the clot shot . . .
Let me count the ways–through political donors (think Soros, etc.) through weaponized NGOs and then law fare conducted by slime like Mark Elias.
That is just the start.
Thru having EVERY State Republican Party controlled by RINO’s who gain patronage by insuring “the right people” win.
Control the State R party, it gets you a long way towards controlling election outcomes.
https://www.belfercenter.org/event/defending-digital-democracy-project-presents-battlestaff-bootcamp
Pay to Play, straight out of the Windy City, or the mob in NYC. They both wrote the book. With footnotes.
Well, FIRST they stage a crises, to generate a Public demand for Federal Govt action, which was Bush v Gore, back in 2000.
That public debacle over “chads” caused many Americans to support the idea of ‘modernising’ our elections.
Most didn’t know the punchcard system that made the “hanging chads” was only used in 4 percent of voting locations, Nationwide, and was being phased out.
So, they passed an authorisation bill, to ‘give’ States $100,000 to buy election equipment.
“You don’t want to be embarrassed like Florida was” AND the fact that State officials were going to be regularly sighning lucrative contracts, and the $ wasn’t coming out of State coffers, made it irresistable.
Mostly this “pitch” wasn’t even made to Legislatures, I think, Govs and SoS’s, with Legislatures focused on writing legislation rather than asking “SHOULD we do this?” they were focused on “HOW do we do this?”
Anyway, thats how it started.
As with most things, follow the money.
As Sundance has mentioned, the DNC and RNC are private organizations. They are outside the government and they operate up and down the election process at all state, local and federal levels. They aren’t the only way of controlling things at the state and local levels, but it does give you a window into the process.
The DNC used a fundraising platform called ACT BLUE. Guess who also shared that same fundraising platform. Black Lives Matter. That’s right! All those donations to BLM fed the DNC beast.
I don’t believe BLM and Antifa are these organic citizen created uprising groups that they are made out to be. I believe they are a fabrication of these same bad actors inside and outside of govt who are trying to destroy our country from within.
Now think back on all the endless reporting on the fake BLM protests. Makes you realize, if the major networks didn’t have fake news, then they would have no news at all.
What weren’t they covering when they covered all the mostly peaceful fake BLM stuff? Organic MAGA gatherings taking place from coast to coast like the Yuge MAGA boat parades in FL and the 80+ mile MAGA car caravans in AZ.
Obama helped build BLM and he imported Antifa leaders straight from Germany to shape up the sorry bunch over here.
That’s his “civilian” military equivalent.
Money.
Probably know which federal programs various states use to cook the books and line
the pockets of our elected misrepresentatives. And let the guilty know play it their way or
the gravy train doesn’t leave the station.
If the feds really wanted to bring a few counties around Atlanta to their knees, they’d
withhold Title 1 money to the schools, along with English as a second language. Community
Development Block grants. If they froze up highway funds to Gwinnett County it would get
REAL interesting. The concrete cartel has used Gwinnett as their honeypot for decades.
Witness the idiotic “traffic reducing ” interchanges around 1-85.
More likely, bribery.
DHS, via CISA, controls Twitter” with Sequoia Capital owning, or should we be calling them a partner with Twitter?
Now I learn that “DHS Partnered with Social Media Surveillance Systems”. So what does this make Sequoia Capital and DHS, via CISA?
“For me, I feel confident that all of the conflicting and odd data points only reconcile in one direction. DHS, via CISA, controls Twitter.”
Binance and Sequoia Capital to Back Elon Musk’s Twitter Buyout
—
Sequoia Capital to Commit $800 Million
American venture capital firm Sequoia Capital, which has a history of backing Elon Musk’s endeavours, and had been willing to contribute $800 million to the initial Twitter deal, also plans to keep its funding in place.
If Musk agrees to acquire Twitter for the previously agreed $54.20 per share, the deal could be valued at as much as $44 billion.
https://dailycoin.com/binance-and-sequoia-capital-to-back-elon-musks-twitter-buyout/
Perhaps as now we wonder if Elon knew what he was getting into with Twitter, these folks are just beginning to wonder what they got themselves into as his partners . . .
I do not understand this relationship at all.
Musk says ElonGate will grow as public learns its meaning 🙂
I bet he loves the word elongate!
Haha!
Binance, Sequoia and CISA all behind Musk? Could any good could come of such a gang of thieves in the night?
I guess I’ve found myself at the best place to get a better understanding. Certainly nothing is as it appears on the surface.
Wow this rabbit hole is really deep.
All this boils down to a snakeoil salesman drinking his own magic brew.
You demonstrate that the “rule of law” is dead. That our government considers us as “terrorists”. That both sides of the uniparty protect the intelligence community that sees we the people as the enemy.
The constitution of these United States has failed to restrain the government from trampling our rights. Those that seek justice cannot look to our courts or our government for any relief.
What then is the answer?
How long would our forefathers have waited?
I would argue thatvit is the Intelligence community that is protecting both sides if the Uniparty, not the other way around.
“How long would our forefathers have waited?”
It was 1 1//2 YEARS between Concord, when british troops shot colonists down, and the DECLARATION of INDEPENDANCE being printed and disseminated.
And it was put out just after King Henry made it clear the that while he would grant amnesty to colonists, the Founders would be hung.
Hence “We must all hang together, or we will surely be hung, seperately.”
Our founders were not “hotheads” and they actually explored every other option, before going to War.
And, our enemy is NOT King George, and going to War does not MAGA.
“…our enemy is NOT King George, and going to War does not MAGA.”
AMEN.
Bill Gates said that in 2024 there would be a hung election and then a civil war. There it is again, that penchant for telling us what they plan to do.
We can choose not to comply.
The rot was there long before Trump came around and took the Oval Office by surprise, Trump is responsible for the Deep State/Cartel exposing themselves, they were scared and got careless.
Without Elon buying Twitter all this juicy information would not be coming out, it would sill be hidden and all the people he ran off would still be working there. I’m sure there is a lot more information to come out.
Trump and Elon were/are essential in exposing all of the rot, without them we would not have all this undeniable evidence that is coming out daily.
I will take my champions any way I can Get them. As far as I’m concerned they are at the forefront of the battle, are they perfect, no, but nobody is.
The truth is that it will all of us working together to destroy this Monster. A house divided can not stand.
Eternally grateful to you Sundance.
And may I see this containment facility? I mean letter? Seriously, post it or post it again if I missed it.
What’s your point here? Your preaching to the choir, want to knuckle bump and say “church”?
What can we do? What can you do?
Calling attention to Twitter meeting with FBI/DHS/DNI and the removal of the NY Post report on the Biden Laptop.
John Rattcliffe was DNI.
Here’s what he said at the time:
https://nypost.com/2020/10/19/john-ratcliffe-info-on-hunter-biden-laptop-not-russian-disinformation/
…”Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe on Monday said the information contained on Hunter Biden’s laptop revealed by The Post last week “is not part of some Russian disinformation campaign.”…
…“Hunter Biden’s laptop is not part of some Russian disinformation campaign,” Ratcliffe said.
“Let me be clear: The intelligence community doesn’t believe that because there is no intelligence that supports that. And we have shared no intelligence with Adam Schiff, or any member of Congress,” he said.”…
…“It’s funny that some of the people who complain the most about intelligence being politicized are the ones politicizing the intelligence,” Ratcliffe said. “Unfortunately, it is Adam Schiff who said the intelligence community believes the Hunter Biden laptop and emails on it are part of a Russian disinformation campaign.”…
…Ratcliffe said the computer is “in the jurisdiction of the FBI.”
“The FBI has had possession of this,” he said. “Without commenting on any investigation that they may or may not have, their investigation is not centered around Russian disinformation and the intelligence community is not playing any role with respect to that.”…
…“In this case, Adam Schiff saying this is part of a disinformation campaign and that the intelligence community has assessed and believes that — that is simply not true,” Ratcliffe said. “Whether it’s Republicans or Democrats, if they try to leverage the intelligence community for political gain, I won’t allow it.”
Interesting that the team at Twitter censored the story based on their policies for “hacked” material rather than “disinformation”.
Schifty Schit pushed the “Russian disinformation” angle.
trying to avoid making schifty schit look like the liar he is?
The upper echelons of the Election Integrity Partnership, (where Twitter was a participating social media platform and the Belfer Center D3P was a civil society stakeholder), had an inside track to the FBI, Crowdstrike, GaTech researchers, and “Russian attribution” research.
They knew that the “Russian collusion” narrative was under intense scrutiny and was failing by October 2020. Igor Danchenko, a Russian pushing disinformation, was identified as Steele’s primary subsource during the summer 2020, and Twitter researchers were being deplatformed left and right.
The higher echelon shifted to “hacked” material as the basis for removal. Rodney Joffe and the DARPA Ga Tech researchers hadn’t been outted yet, iir.
Sundance,
other than bullets, lots of them, how do we stop this Tyranny? it is everywhere. We voluntarily built this prison, and it is so intertwined like a cancerous tumor, it is hard to see the top or the head.
It seems President Trump will only be keeping the seat warm. Like Canadian “conservatives”.
Even if President Trump is elected, these evil agencies will put on the afterburners against the people once he is gone. Short of dissolving these unconstitutional agencies, which is highly unlikely, what can we do?
I hear all about getting involved with (Uniparty) GOP at the grass roots level. Why? Every single Senator is beholden to that Scab McConnell, not your country. I would have Specially Prepped Cabinet Members and Directors of these agencies fired and replaced by Buzzsaw Leaders who will destroy them from within, or render them impotent in the short time they are there.
Bravo to you for educating us. I cling to this site for the intelligent articles and the great commenters.
We are all likely on a list for being here. So FU FBI. FILTHY LIBERALS
“Sundance, other than bullets, lots of them, how do we stop this Tyranny?”
There’s going to come a time when at least some on this forum will realize there isn’t a way. We are way past the point where anything but the 2nd Amendment is going to fix this country. So maybe it’s time to face the obvious and prepare for that?
The Second Amendment aknowledges citisens have a God given right to keep and bear arms, it says nothing about USING those arms, to overthrow a Tyranical regime.
In The American CW we lost far more, than in all other wars combined, because combatants on both sides were Americans, AND unlike every other war, it was fought on American soil, which means there were LOTS if civilian casualties (always are in War) and THEY were all Americans, too.
Our enemies goals are Destruction of America, and depopulation of America.
HOW, exactly does another CW do anything but advance their goals?How does it MAGA?
It DOESN’T.
In fact, we all know our enemy has been salivating at the prospect, and has been (very amatuerly and transparently) trying to false flag instigate just that scenario.
And all these macho man comments, discourage voting, trying to sieze control of the R party away from the GOPe, or ANY action, and instead urge INACTION.
According to such posters, we are just supposed to “prepare”, presumably stocking up on guns and ammo.
Our enemies WANT us to be inactive, rather than active.
They don’t LIKE it when MAGA takes control of State R parties.
And none of you ever answers the question,…HOW, exactly is YOUR solution going to “fix” this country?
Because IT WON’T.
When I was a kid I watched two birds fighting in a tree, one fell to the ground, and a cat zipped over to meet it.
We have a lot of cats that would love for us to make ourselves so vulnerable, and have well prepared themselves for such an event.
You’re on fire today, dutch!
Great point… many of us want a civil war, which is exactly how color revolutions work, right? Divide and agitate a population until they go at each other?
We’re all being psy-op’d.
It would play right into the hands of our enemies and that’s the plan, I agree.
At the same time, we’ve had two elections stolen openly with mail-in ballots. If January 6th had not been hijacked to create the US version of the Reichstag Fire, maybe we would have had a Brazil-like moment and taken to the streets… but I feel that Americans have it too good. “I can’t make the revolution tomorrow, it’s Halo night.” I don’t know many that would take off to protest… yet.
I thought inflation would generate enough discomfort to get folks’ attention… and it probably has, but as Sundance points out, the gubmint is controlling the conversation through social media and lamestream news sources (who checks the fact checkers?).
And I thought Obama phones were just a gubmint grift… they wanted everyone in this country ass-planted in front of social media. Brilliant strategy and we’re seeing the return on their investment every day, much to our disappointment and sorrow.
Spreading the info and waking folks up is a worthy endeavor. The Precinct Strategy is good but will take determination, perseverance, and drive… it will be a long drawn-out war, not a battle.
I’m a precinct committeeman myself, though it’s a very small part of a very small county with no influence to speak of. Power in numbers. Maybe one day, we will have the power to be rid of slime balls like Lindsey Graham, Tim Scott, and Nancy Mace.
Thanks for the perspective and have a great day everyone!
FL,
Yes, every Senator IS beholden to Mitch,…
but over 1/2 of the R caucus, is NOT beholden to Mitch OR Kevin; they were elected to office in the last 2-3 elections, and are beholden to PDJT.
In Az, the MAGA Candidates did NOT have to run a double gauntlet, with a splitter MAGA Candidate in the primaries.
Thats a major improvement from previous elections, and a direct result if MAGA Patriots “getting involved at the local level” and prevented the State Party from such duplicity.
Hence, they were forced to set up the steal, for all the World to see, including seeing it was two County REPUBLICAN officials that supervised the Steal at the Maracopa Tabulation center.
THAT did more to get R voters to truly understand what UNIPARTY, RINO and GOPe means, and to understand you DO NOT “Vote straight R ticket” because if you do, you vote for “R” candidates like Richer and Gates, who have been censured by the now MAGA State party,…yes “too little, too late” but the National education, to teach people “vote for the R, in the general, cause the D is worse” is a discredited, failed strategy is worth it.
PDJT now has a plan, AND an army of battle scarred MAGA warriors eager to be appointed to positions in his admin, to be the buzz saws.
All the candidates that ran as MAGA Candidates, endured the barrage of attacks, and had their elections stolen from them, AND THEIR STAFFS, makes for a LOT of motivated people to staff his next administration with.
For me, its FU UNIPARTY, which is the WEF/CCP USA
And proud to be on that list!
Lemme tell ya, Treeps, if you aren’t following SD on Twitter you are missing out on some serious fun.
I deleted my Twitter account on the Independence Day following their banning of our President.
I just recreated one earlier this week. If they’re going to let conservatives have a voice again, I want to be there to help throw sand.
I’m following James Woods, President Trump, and our investigative badass Sundance.
I gotta get back on too!
.
He “knew”. His lawyers would have known. One thesis: he just didn’t care and paid minimal attention.
My take on Musk’s agenda (which appears to be working quite well) is:
(1) Get people to keep twat in the news and all enthralled that Musk is a great guy (give him more $$$) , including multimillions signing and re-signing up and using twitter again. Just because what he’s doing aligns with our agenda doesn’t necessarily mean that all motives are aligned. (The enemy of my enemy…)
(2) Entertain himself because what else do you do for fun if you’re an amoral nonideological dude who is pretty smart about science and business but essentially apathetic and/or ignorant about history, law, philosophy, etc., and who already has everything including rocket ships and any model he wants to date.
(3) Use twitter as superb incomparable and powerful leverage in negotiations with the U.S. and other governments to facilitate continued deal-making with his other companies and “public-private partnerships” (the possibilities for expansion into various and sundry power-broking and data-gathering/monitoring/controlling arenas — including financial, see Paypal et al. — are almost endless).
.
Agree pretty much but am curious why you would assume he is ignorant about history, law and philosophy?
He holds a BA in economics and BS in physics. Apparently he dropped out after 2 days in a PHD in physics program because he was working on his first start up
I’m afraid you’ll be proven correct on all points.
“For their own self-preservation, the Intelligence Branch has been interfering in our elections for years. The way to tear this apart begins with STATE LEVEL election reform that blocks the Legislative Branch from coordinating with the Intelligence Branch…Our elections have been usurped by the Intelligence Branch. Start with honest elections and we will see just how much Democrat AND Republican corruption is dependent on manipulated election results. Start at the state level. Start there…. everything else is downstream.”
—
This is why one need not be perplexed as to why common-sense election process reforms have not been happening in many states–even red states–where it has so obviously been needed. The 4th Branch increasingly controls our elections.
EM will never admit it but I think he understood and watched DJT fight hard and basically saw what had been done to DJT and decided to try to help. And am sure will come out even richer in the end and everyone talks about how bad it is but few have the $ and the ego to fight against this corrupt and lawless establishment. Schiff and others swatted away like little pissants they are. Pray and help others
What jumps out at me from this obvious spider web of control by the intelligence scoundrels is they keep running into a brick wall of kinetic force when these clandestine manipulators actually foment violent wars or revolutions to try to impose globalist goals.
When you look at what happened in Egypt, you begin to see how manipulation gets stopped by kinetic force unleashed against it.
To me, Russia’s inevitable, complete victory in Ukraine will take down the evil manipulation of NATO and Western leaders. Throwing billions into Ukraine while Ukraine’s corpses keep piling up is leading to a major disaster for, and defeat of, the West.
Ukraine is a “bridge too far” for globalist manipulators. It turns out countries such as Russia have deep, historical and cultural roots they will fight to the death to preserve. The West has openly called for the destruction of Russia. They want its breakup. They want to plunder its resources. They make no secret of it. THE RUSSIAN PEOPLE KNOW IT.
Russia is actively and successfully organizing a huge part of the world to destroy these Obama globalists whose ideology cannot prevail against countries whose power and might come from their nationalism.
There can NEVER be a one-world government because a massive number of countries and peoples will not submit to it. They all correctly see this as attempted destruction of everything cultural and historic these peoples hold dear.
I am sure the globalists will be destroyed for carrying their ideological extremism WAY TOO FAR.
I pray for Russia to prevail and thrive.
I want us to return to being humanity’s best hope, but am not at all sure that’s in the cards.
I was resigned to the possibility that Russia would bear the banner for Christian Civilization even before we started the war with them.
Since Ukraine, I have re-examined the “arab spring” and see it in a new light.
Venezuela, sitting on Oceans of oil, had its oil production system nationalised, and then rendered inoperable.
Thats One.
Funding Iran, the major destabilising influence in the ME, starting the “color revolutions” in ME countries, and ARMING ISIS was, I believe done with the intention of eventually shutting down oil priduction IN the ME, while as a “side benefit” effectively herding 10’s of millions of illegals up into Europe.
Thats two.
And then you have the euromaiden cia instigated ‘revolution’ in Ukraine to install Z, and if Hillary had won I am confident we would have seen the same scenario plat out, of poking the bear in 2018, and their plan was regime change/dissolution in Russia, a THIRD major oil producer
Thats 3
“Once?,….happenstance.
Twice?,..coincidence.
But a THIRD TIME?
Thats enemy action!”
And of coarse stifling oil production in the U.S., which would make it FOUR.
Many have talked of a “War over oil” by which they meant two countrues fighting for access TO oil, but it turns out its a fight AGAINST oil.
And our enemies have been waging this war for awhile.
Agree, except I doubt Z played any part in “our” plans in 2014 when “we” instigated the 2014 coup in Ukraine
I agree with your exception.
We didn’t change the player in charge, but the team.
Globalists believe Ukraine is a bridge too far???
I believe it IS their bridge to the depopulation/Genocide they need for 7.5 Billion people to be eliminated so they can have THEIR perfect planet.
How could Elon Musk not know x, y, and z? Easy. Many reasons.
1. He’s running multiple companies, at least three substantial, very public, multi-billion companies.
2. He likely delegates a ton.
3. Bc of #2, he relies on key executives, but does he have enough Devil’s Advicates? New employees likely not open to divulging critical lapses (Self preservation).
4. James Baker not outted in San Francisco? Duh.
5. He’s a techie.
6. He likely goes from passion to problem, problem to passion. Lots of balls in the air.
7. Bc he knows there are Free Speech issues doesn’t mean he knows all the intricacies of the system.
8. Dr. Shiva ousted the hi tech portals years ago, and nobody looked into it. He said there are “playbooks”, the Ivy League was involved in designing it, and the system was designed to also key in on ‘influencers”…his ego has gotten bigger, bruised, and his emotions are raw. (Three or four MIT degrees, but all over the place.)
9. All of the above.
“BIG Brother” has been here since Obozo & his Marxist Regime took power. We ARE living in Geo.Orwell’s 1984. The QUESTION is WHO is going to stop it, HOW, and WHEN?
I dare say we are living in the revolution that created Orwell’s once fictional world.
A LOT longer. THEY pulled an Intel op, to torpedo ONE POTUS Candidate they knew wouldn’t ‘go along’ with their plans, and then assasinated another, in order to install one that WOULD.
They “Watergated” another POTUS, forcing him to resign to avoid Impeachment, and they tried it again with PDJT and “the Insurance Policy”.
At the very least, it was Obozos predescessor, Bills “brother from another mother” Bush and Chaney that set the whole thing up, “teeing it up” for Obozo.
The Biden campaign back channel into Twitter is so “Big Brother”.
AS a newbie to politics and poli sci, around 2005…I recall discussions about intel fusion centers being constructed…
Right after 9/11…as it was politicized and patriotism was emphasized along with outrage…I recall reading a lot of MSM and academic articles about how average citizens where ‘opening up’ about their own ‘research’ into the MB and other org’s that had their fingers in the situations. There was a lot of discussion in the various blogs of how some were using the bilingual skills on blog sites/chat rooms,, to identify ‘problems’. Some even notified alphabets where it fell on deaf ears.
Go deeper and one finds the following:
https://www.dni.gov/index.php/who-we-are/history
The first sentence says it all: The idea of a Director of National Intelligence dates to 1955 when a blue-ribbon study commissioned by Congress recommended that the Director of Central Intelligence employ a deputy to run the CIA so that the director could focus on coordinating the overall intelligence effort.
Oh, who is knocking on my door at 0100?
As a newbie, wet behind the ears, I bought into the idea as it was marketed to citizens and students, (shortly after 9/11). Hey what did I know?/s
Baby Bush’s favorite words…Public Private Partnerships…Interoperability…Seamless…again, the citizenry, me included, were misled by a skillfully executed marketing campaign.
then came MOU, FLUWEG, SAFECOM, etc, etc.
First few paragraphs set a stage and use some scare phrases…’a national solution to the interoperability challenge’…
What is scary, is that the ideas for some of this stuff, like the DNI–go way back…
Well, the 900 page Patriot Act was passed only six weeks after 9/11, it had to have been written already when the towers fell, so your argument that many of its ideas have been percolating until something was concocted to enable their implementation is sound.
This is one of the most important sentences from the CTH article, regarding Musk/Twitter:
The alternative explanation is much more nefarious and involves Musk as a willing participant.
Either Musk is truly a very poor businessman, who blindly purchases something at the cost of his entire portfolio, or else…..this is part of a truly nefarious ‘con job’. I suppose the first (or perhaps most important) question would be….how was the purchase of Twitter financed? Musk? Or some faction of the US government?
Musk became the world’s richest man off of .gov. The bot farm known as Twitter was purchased for well over market value. Musk knows what he is doing.
Yeah, he’s working for the government apparently, and all of this is ‘controlled opposition’….???? Maybe. Sounds logical
I wonder if DHS is the patsy here. If you take the theory that the Snowden ‘revelation’ was actually a part of an internal war between the CIA and NSA; that Snowden was actually a CIA operative whose purpose was to expose the NSA so that the CIA could maintain its ‘intelligence’ superiority, the question, in the Musk/Twitter situation becomes, what intelligence agency benefits from the ‘downfall’ of the DHS??
It’s easy for us to forget that many people have only a passing knowledge of the Russiagate story (and many of those got their info from state run media).
It’s quite reasonable that Elon has no idea about Baker’s role in Spygate/Russiagate.
Wonder where James Baker will go next?
Lawfare I’d imagine.
MAGA ran this cesspool for 4 years. SD asked the former ODNI director a question on Twitter about what he knew. Any answers?
It would be interesting to see what these censors were doing during the wknd Fentanyl Floyd overdosed especially, the Summer of Love generally
Soooo…given the inference vis IC personnel control through multiple portals (SSCI approval, FBI clearance vetting)…there should be public records of every individual hired/appointed into the bureaucracy. It would probably be useful to aggregate this data, mapped to position, to initiate the process of allocating accountability.
Remember Sundance’s “You Are Here” graphic of the monster tentacled Derp State?
Yeah, that’s a hell of a task, but I agree a worthy one.
Sundance : Twitter is to the US government as Tik Tok is to China.
President Trump ordered a ban on Tik Tok, which was revoked by Biden.
The illegal OBiden regime, is an equivalent to communist China —
in word, thought and deed.
Evil is as evil does.
Government is people, individuals who’s names should be noted and the list of published..
I want our money back.
I want our future back
I want our country back.
If you look at the “gang of eight” they all were likely subject to blackmail BEFORE their appointment tho the Committee.
Price of admission.
These guys are the ones that determine what kind and how many ducks you can shoot a day for a limit.
Keep turning up the lights. You can’t fight what you can’t see.
Incredible work, Sundance.
In a sane world, this would be required reading for students.
I envision this as a class for credits in colleges across our nation.
Better yet, across the world….
Bullshit. Our current pres worked on the Patriot Act back in the days prior to 2000/01. Who else was involved?
I hope this was sent to President Trump. My real hope is he reads Conservative Tree House every day. I wish there was a way to know if he does. With the probably millions of emails, etc he receives I always feel any communication I try to send will either be lost or ignored by those who probably filter it for Trumps review. I’m still going to try at least for an email and I hope all CTH members do the same, maybe with short excerpts to pique the interest of those reviewing the emails.
I sent a number of pleas to that effect to PDJT when he occupied the WhiteHouse.
Many Treepers did.
Frankly, I love to discover some beautiful day in the near future that he has engaged with Sundance.
While I have an aversion to the term “Synergy” from my active duty days, it would be so very applicable to that pair.
When a system/ machine is over pressurized it needs a blow-valve or some kind of relief to avoid catastrophic failure. There are many ways to accomplish this feat, sometimes very complicated and clandestine. Inversion is just one of many.
Musk was alerted about Baker in April (he responded):
I don’t think Elon knew the severity of influence. As to him being allowed to procure the finances, the swamp underestimated him and felt they had more leverage than he feels they do and enough wealthy people knew they would not stand a chance facing the swamp so they encouraged and helped make the deal happen hoping enough sunlight would help return things to a more manageable sustainable level.
So can any government agency violate the Consitution either directly or indirectly through an intermediary? It’s all good?
Sounds like a great court case before any Judge still worthy of that title, let alone appealing all the way to SCOTUS. Plus all Judges good and bad, saints and sinners alike would benefit by taking away the blackmail control of the 4th branch.
In short use the 4A to take out the power of the 4th branch. All ‘evidence’ (real or made up) they have gathered outside the limits set forth by the 4A ‘cannot’ by definition be used in a court of law due to ‘how’ it was gathered, full stop.
Mass surveillance/collection (a clear 4A violation) followed by a search of that data in order to target a uniparty unacceptable person for ‘a’ crime, from that data, is clearly not admissible in US Constitutional court.
In fact, all of it is strictly off-limits in a jury trial.
Their power of blackmail goes away from a legal perspective. Plus releasing both real and fake ‘evidence’ puts the higher levels of their agency in personal legal jeopardy if they want to use it socially to control people as well. Say for a Senator so and so cheating on his wife. Personal note; actually happened to a Senator I was dealing with in order to control them.
And for the Judges with dirt on them being controlled by the DC criminal syndicate, it would be a side shot of elevating the 4A back into its proper place thus making the ‘blackmailer’ which is a crime (ie the DC criminal syndicate) guilty of crimes and not you. In fact blackmailing someone in a position of power that would also benefit them financially will add even more charges on them and not you BTW.
Plus, if a conspiracy to systematically subvert the Constitution isn’t a ‘capital’ crime I don’t know what is.
But it’s going to take someone outside of this self-reinforcing system of corruption to break the back of the DC crime syndicate. One Senator, one Representative, one Government official is simply too powerless before this evil. In short, they will just make something up and prosecute them via a corrupt judge, like General Flynn.
But there is perhaps one position, President, and one man, President Donald J Trump, that could. I grow tired of talking to various people that understand all or most of what I wrote above and yet don’t understand what a stroke of divine providence he represents. That anyone under the control of the criminal syndicate could ‘ever’ deliver, short of a lightning bolt miracle, what we need.
While I’m sure PDJT is not perfect, he is practically an Eagle Scout vs those that are a part of the criminal syndicate above. Most importantly he is his own man, loves the concept of America, loves Americans, and owes absolutely no allegiance to the criminal syndicate infecting DC and the world at large.
If you told me 20 years ago I would think that PDJT would be the path towards defeating the crime syndicate I would have said you were crazy.
And yet divine providence is ‘always’ like that. Throughout human history, the most unlikely people, judged by humans, are the ones God works through in order to bring his will forth.
Something Satan does as well, as clearly represented by his anti-human Malthusian cult of Davos and their WEF acolytes.
Elon is being upfront. He runs Starlink, SoaceX, Tesla, Neuolink and the Boring Company. He is able to do this by focusing on what he needs to know, which means there’s alot he doesn’t know. But I feel rather definitely that he is not on their side.