On May 5th, Fox News host Tucker Carlson interviewed Catherine Englebrecht from True the Vote (TTV) and discussed a massive ballot harvesting scheme in the 2020 election. The work done by Englebrecht formed the basis for a documentary by Dinesh D’Souza that outlines the 2020 election fraud and how it was done using ballot mules.
We noted at the time of the interview, it seemed odd that neither Tucker Carlson nor Catherine Englebrecht would mention the documentary movie “2000 Mules” that was premiering during the week of the interview. It all seemed rather curious. Well, now Dinesh D’Souza is stating that Tucker Carlson and his team specifically instructed Catherine Englebrecht not to mention the movie.
I wonder if such a stunning accusation, and all of the political implications within it for both Fox News and Carlson, is going to lead to a response from Tucker Carlson tonight? Or is this coordinated PR truth-bending to stimulate more interest in the movie?
According to a public release, 2000 Mules netted more than $1 million in the first twelve hours:
LONGBOAT KEY, Fla., May 9, 2022 /PRNewswire/ — Dinesh D’Souza’s new movie “2000 Mules,” which launched on Saturday, May 7, 2022, grossed more than one million dollars in less than twelve hours on the video streaming platform Rumble and its subscription-based platform, Locals. The movie’s gross sales on Rumble and Locals, which began on Saturday at noon, are good enough to put “2000 Mules” in the estimated box office top ten for the weekend of May 6th to May 8th.
https://youtu.be/p8fsx1PcxPk
I get disappointed in people on a daily basis these days, it is why I TRUST NO ONE.
Tucker better get to work and address this statement from Dinesh… or leave us to assume the worst about his purported principles and journalistic ethics. Silence on this is unacceptable.
I don’t assume the worst of Carlson.
I assume the worst of the powers who undoubtedly threatened him after the Tony Bobulinski episode, when his mail was intercepted.
Everyone has to do what they can. Some are
more threatened than others
I don’t assume the worst…yet. He’s their bread and butter. He’s in a position of strength here. Fox has already made clear whose side they’re on, and it’s not on the side of journalistic integrity.
My opinion is that if he goes along with this, then for me he is nothing more than a talk show host. Which is about 10 steps below what I considered him to be.
I have always liked Tucker being he was mentored by Pat Buchanan on the McLaughlin show which I watched for many years
I have as well, my friend, and I still do. At this point my view is, for me, this is a chink in his conservative armour. Those are never good.
true – but he does need to stay on the air to be an effective voice. Hopefully he will address this.
Tucker does not need Fox to stay on the air..
Are you kidding! Do you think people are going to tune into some unknown cable station that even the cable TV companies like Comcast and AT&T won’t carry?
Bill O’Who? LOL
Agree. Though not on Fox, Direct tv’s asinine move taking down AON, with Dan Ball and other good commentators, ruined a good diverse option.
Now, with exception of Newsmax, all channels sound alike. I quit Fox a couple of weeks before election as their tone had changed dramatically. Overall, not even good enough to snooze by.
Wish Tucker were on a different network; hope he stays in the fight.
I read an interesting thing today about election, or if you prefer (and I do) coup night 2020.
Almost immediately after Bret Baer called Arizona for the thing occupying the oval office now, the states which showed a clear lead for Mr Trump simultaneously shut down their counting…the suggestion being that Fox was signaling the steal was on.
It was an interesting supposition. Not pointing fingers, you understand. Just reporting on what I read. And I’ll leave it there.
A few of the talking heads, only a few, will openly state the 2020 election was stolen. It looks like there is a Fox News “preference” (i.e., dictum) that emphasis that the election was legitimate and that Trump did indeed lose. But then maybe Tucker just doesn’t like Dinesh? Laura devoted a large portion of her show to an interview with Catherine and her co-producer. But then Tucker went wobbly with Sidney Powell and her research. Catherine’s research used a different methodology to codify the conclusions that Sidney reached early on. Go figure.
The higher profile you are the more careful you have to be about which horse you hitch your cart to. I don’t need to go into how disappointing the whole 2 week, kraken, etc. crowd have been but Tucker and other more mainstream voices have enough heat on them without being lumped along with the Qanon crew or being humiliated by said Kraken never appearing. Maybe some of us forget how nutty it got back then? Tucker took enough of a risk even demanding hard proof from Sidney, he shouldn’t have touched the matter at all until there was an actual killer bullet. As it is he’s gradually pushed the overton window at Fox towards being able to even imply election fraud.
Removed.
Worth the while, but I do not have the time to respond if there was a reply.
Thanks for your patience.
God Bless ya’ll & Semper FI ~!
Garrison, by being constrained by those who sign his paychecks, what he has done is participated in censorship. Thou will not discuss.
Fox is in the hands of rabid leftists, the Murdochs (and in particular the Murdoch brothers’ spouses).
Anything we view on Fox must be viewed with that fact in mind.
….and remember this…Tucker has done several monologues on the evils of censorship and the plans for this (not our) government to make censorship a full blown part of the federal government.
There’s a dichotomy here on this issue, no? What he preaches about as opposed to how it plays out on the network which employs him. Perhaps I’m making too much of this. But to me principles matter.
It’s already been widely reported that FOX legal team is blocking discussion of the movie.
You, of course, are welcome to assume in the way that seems ethical to you.
I certainly am welcome to do just as you say, thank you. And yes, as I answered above, I am aware of this.
My focus is not on the legalities. We all understand that I’d hope. The question I have is what price honesty and journalistic ethics? They used to actually mean something. One stands for all principles and truth in Tucker’s business or (again my opinion) they stand for nothing.
Let me put it another way. I’d trust Dinesh more than any corporate journalistic entity or person who is.employed by them. For me, it’s that simple.
I agree…🇺🇸💪😀👍
Boom! Excellent take
There is no such thing as partial trust. Such as I trust on the reporting 98% of the time. So which 98% of that would be? Trust is just one of those black and white issues for me…just as there is only information, no dis- or mis- information, Bananas.
Another example…
I trust Sundance and his analytical reporting 100% of the time. His ethics are firmly in place. Were there more like him.
Trust comes in degrees. You trust the school bus driver to safely take your children to and from the school but not necessarily to babysit them for you. You trust your chair to hold you while sitting but not enough to use it as a step ladder.
I used to trust that doctors really did have the best interests of their patients as the core of their profession. Hippocratic Oath and all that.
Now? I’d trust that bus driver you use as an example to do his job more than any doctor.
There are just some professions where full trust is necessary. Of course information is fluid. But to be ordered to not ask a key person involved in trying to expose the massive fraud which has cost us all so much about the stunning and it seems conclusive evidence that it did happen? And then to follow that order? It diminishes that trust in the man who was “just following orders.” I’m actually wondering why Tucker even had her on as a guest if the subject of the movie wasn’t allowed.
I am, of course, just explaining how I view it.
I think they used a previous interview from 2021. That’s
why there’s no mention of the movie in it. They fixed it that way. That’s my guess.
Fleemit: Links to support your “widely reported … legal team” reference?
Silence in response to evil is tacit support for evil.
This is very disappointing.
Thank you, Maximus. My point exactly.
Tucker has more than proven himself…
The guy had to move to Maine to get some peace and safety for his family.
Crime is on the rise here with all of the “asylum” seekers that have arrived over the past 10 or so years, and all of the lefty policies that have become rooted into the culture. Drugs are through the roof and the legalizing of pot is a big part of it. In the Auburn\ Lewiston area, there’s one pot store for every 2,178 people. To put that in perspective,to operate a fairly successful pizza restaurant…anywhere in the country, there needs to be a population in close proximity of about 10 to 12K (that was data I remember from a few years back, so maybe that’s changed)
Hunter Biden was a very nice boy when they were little tykes, according to Tucker himself.
Ugh…..
He needs to somehow opt out of his Faux contract and move on to one of the up and coming conservative networks. If he left Faux, a lot of Paul Ryan’s network viewership would follow.
I’d hope in the end he’d make that move..and I had totally forgotten Ryan sat on their board. The winds are changing I think. Tucker is smart. He ought to consider that option when, as you say, his contractual obligations are satisfied.
Carlson has said on more than one occasion that Fox management has supported his independence.
Guess he can’t say that any more. If I were him, I would have threatened to walk and take my ratings with me. Hit Fox in the wallet, where it really hurts.
You can trust in God. HE isn’t a politician or a news anchor.
Trust NO ONE.
Question EVERYTHING.
This is always good advice.
I hear you.
These days, as far as I’m concerned, you’re my political enemy until you prove otherwise.
Renoldus Magnus stated it many times. – ‘Trust but verify.’
I love Mankind. It’s people I can’t stand.
-Linus Van Pelt
Put your faith in God, son. People will let you down every time.
-my Mom
Simple sentence…absolute wisdom. No less than I’d expect from an awesome mom!
AAck!
I’m a self reliant man that doesn’t do hero worship and I do not put people up on pedestals.
TC is an employee, he has a job that gives him a great living and he’s at the top of his game. He sometimes has to walk a tightrope to keep it going.
Conservative having this purity principal are setting themselves up to be used by the left and to alienate allies.
Trust your cat but not people.
Just like everyone else Tucker Carlson has to answer to his bosses and do as he’s told. Tucker has gone 1000% for us every night and it’s a miracle that the Left hasn’t been able to take him out. The guy had to move his family from Washington DC to the woods of Maine to escape their wrath!
Why INgraham can no longer have Ann Coulter on her show.
She was forbidden, per Coulter.
FOx CONTROLS WHO and WHAT the agenda is, period.
Ann turned out to be a dud in the end..
Not hardly. Ann led the charge, point of spear, for a couple decades.
She’s an opportunist.
No joke or exaggeration, she’s a bona fide real life paid troll. Part of me is impressed.
Coulter is a POS I don’t care to see and hear anyway.
Guess it is time to ditch Carlson. That is the only program that is one I watch . Actually scheduled it to come on automatically, and it goes off when it is done. Guess I’ll ditch that one also. Used to watch a lot of that channel, not any more. DONE NOW.
Maria on Sunday is the only one left.
Maria doesn’t come close to Tucker!
I think it would be a mistake to ditch Tucker – he has tons of interesting info on his program. I think he was restricted by his employer from mentioning the movie and instead he at least got Catherine on the air. Better than just ignorning the facts of the steal.
BS.
Bye! I’m sure Tucker will miss you.
Agreed. Tucker is no Hannity.
Ahem, Hannity is no Tucker. Not on SEAN’s best day.
Sean Vanity, he’s the best, just ask him… /s
He’s a marksman and also knows martial arts. I don’t know if he’s ever mentioned that or not…
AND he was a bartender at the age of 12, AND was a painter and hung wall paper.
So are you claiming Tucker does not have the integrity needed to be truly and fully trustworthy?
I quit jobs over morals and integrity and risked much for my beliefs and integrity. Probably why I do not agree with and am highly disgusted by all those fence sitters and go-a-long-to-get-along types of weak people that should never be trusted, especially for anything IMPORTANT. They have sold off their children’s future at the cheap price of becoming slaves.
“Let us contemplate our forefathers, and posterity, and resolve to maintain the rights bequeathed to us from the former, for the sake of the latter. The necessity of the times, more than ever, calls for our utmost circumspection, deliberation, fortitude and perseverance. Let us remember that “if we suffer tamely a lawless attack upon our liberty, we encourage it, and involve others in our doom,” it is a very serious consideration that millions yet unborn may be the miserable sharers of the event.” – Samuel Adams
Now there was a man. The Father of the American Revolution!
I think a lot of people don’t notice or care how many people at Fox have been silenced for wandering into forbidden topics. Or how even Newt Gingrich wasn’t allowed to mention Soros’ name until Tucker normalized discussing him.
what exactly is 1000%?….are you saying at one point Carlson was only giving us 10% or 1/10 o his capability?…anyone who uses more than a 100% figure to think they somehow are giving more weight to the following claim is just inane…100% is, after all, ALL of what is being referenced
Huh?
????you are confused about a comment on your comment?????
We watched the movie last night. What will the GOP do about it? I plan on calling my representatives today to find out.
Sundance, I wish your plea to Trump in 2020 to hire Catherine Engelbrecht to oversee the 2020 election would have been heeded. We know what the Democrats did and we also know that the GOP did zero about it.
Do not forget that the entire election fraud was enabled by the GOP. Both at state levels such as Georgia and at the national level (RNC and elected GOP congress members). We have already seen news posts on how GOP party officials in various states actively thwart and stonewall local investigations into vote fraud.
It is a similar situation to GOP foreknowledge and participation in the coup d’etat. The intelligence oversight committees were briefed on the whole FISA/spying operation.
According to Engelbright, GA’s RINO Kemp would not allow inspection of GA voter records until he learned that the movie was completed. RINOs work tirelessly to protect their sorry little Uniparty club.
Catherine Englebrecht
Kemp and Rottenburg are accessories to the crime….not only did they both get kickbacks from GA’s purchase of new Dominion gear in 2019 but they were GUARANTEED reelection in 2020 by supporting the fraud
I hope people noticed in the movie that the auditor hired by the NRSCC(Republicans) found the fraud at the ballot boxes and they did nothing. Kemp knew and sat on it. He and his whole ticket must be defeated on the 24th.
Yes, indeed. This is why many (e.g. Stacy Abrams) became multimillionaires overnight
.
ZuckBucks *could* have made 450 millionaires overnight . . .
Soros just gifted Abrams with a million dollars too.
Seems to me that 99.9% of our government and it’s enablers (corporations, etc) wanted POTUSDJT out. The reason is money…he was interrupting their gravy trains.
They hated him for humiliating them but after he started poking around Ukraine he became a mortal threat to their racket. Most of those scumbags have their filthy little hands in that s*hole
GOP is worthless.
The only difference between the GOP establishment and the Democrat party is honesty.
With the Democrats you know what you are getting. They will tell you straight out that they hate God, hate you, hate life and worship evil and death.
The GOP elites just lie about it.
That’s why the GOP elites are far more dangerous.
EXCEPT during election season….the Marxists simply CANNOT tell the truth during vote-getting time or they lose ALL power
GOP is us. If GOP is worthless it is because we are uninvolved.
Send this link to everyone you can: There is better source.
2000 Mules (2022) – Full Documentary by Dnesh D’Souza [1080p] (odysee.com)
Here is the link to the 2000 mules movie. FREE
https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bitchute.com%2Fvideo%2FoUxVva4yWsuu%2F%3Ffbclid%3DIwAR2mML49oF7qwng8-UWTYz4IeMaf_y20DLYqSLxMLI8nH9t2LHf4yBIRKQQ&h=AT2VL8u06nW5G01MRYGPysMV5dFnj7irr3VPXP1H3dezFyjFkQAssV46z8YLKnFB76mpaVvcO5Qh9awDa11BM_NI7JyYSDXg4SYxil2wlTuV4b_RLgDAOc5AW4Ftr165Abc&__tn__=%2CmH-R&c%5B0%5D=AT2fR-zo06mE6wXEk6ztGyUbneFbria_0bj4wTnmQUkxwToo3glmO3lPIlUOqUj4Qmx1GQajVrgVfgYYfSTW16PHVV9RdsmN_Ya25hbPL8o7XsxWgBqEgkmVWAjqIxEpV_OzYWmNb3P7Ry9Fl991LjhDxw
The GOPe will do nothing-absolutely NOTHING. They were in an the fix / steal.
The GOP was in on it… Most of their leaders belong in prison.
Where and for how much? Would appreciate a response.
“What will the GOP do about it?”
The classics. Play dumb, say they’ll look into it later, or claim shock and outrage and promise to get to the bottom of it… then “forget” about it after diving nose first into a bucket of cocaine.
if you mean the elephant party I expect they will continue to do what they have been doing the last 18 months….support Slo Joe
The fact is Tucker did not ask about the movie and that is a glaring absence of context for the whole interview.
The only speculation is who was responsible. TC himself or Fox senior management. At this point, we KNOW Fox senior management would want to censor the whole thing. My guess is that TC would have discussed the movie if he had permission. The only question is whether TC is willing to honestly reveal he is under restrictions and what those restrictions include.
He can only do what his contract allows.
Funny, I say that about Congress and the rest of the federal government and their contract that is the US Constitution. They don’t follow the contract that created them.
That’s not true. I watched the interview and he brought it all up he just didn’t promote the movie.
He pointed people (oblivious idiots) in the right direction, this doesn’t get better until intellectually lazy slobs who get all their news from cable start paying attention and looking for the truth rather than devouring whatever gets conveniently dropped into their trough.
Tucker simply isn’t for most of the people here. He’s outreach to a huge segment of the population that has little curiosity or ability to navigate the internet. Purity spiraling idiots need to stop demanding he be a cheerleader. He’s not, he’s a countersubversive and the ONLY person pushing the envelope in mainstream.
In that interview I remember Tucker saying to Catherine Engelbrecht that they would discuss her findings further in another type* of showing. Those are my words but I gathered from that, he would then discuss the movie. But what do I know….just glad Dinesh goosed him a bit.
*venue
Probably on his Fox Nation show. He seems to get more freedom on the streaming service.
I wouldn’t know…After election night FOX will never get one dime from me.
Why in the hell would I pay for something that should be free and available to the world….this is in the vein of NATIONAL SECURITY
SOMEONE had to pay to gather the evidence, analyze it, and put it into a format the common man could understand….did you watch the movie?….they mention they had to BUY the ping logs with PB of info….do you know in some areas of WI they charge $15k or MORE for voter list that may not even be accurate on the DAY they are provided….it COSTS to get the facts…..this is NOT happenstance as the criminals do NOT want their actions easily accessible
I was referring to Tuckers pay show….I did PAY to see 2000 Mules….
Yes put the truth behind pay walls and away from the mass public- only way to control us. Only the rich will have knowledge- the rest of us can only vote through ignorance.
Tucker’s show and interview was on cable tv. So are you saying that mass public can afford cable but not ppv? 20$ plus postage gets a person the movie and they don’t have to hear Tucker ask questions. Also, as we saw here without using cable, we watched Tucker.
Similar to the research studies done and put behind a paywall to access the full study. Evidence is there put you must pay despite these people typically getting large amounts of grant money for their universities.
Yup, my impression too. I took it as code speak, taking a hit at someone while be pleasant, or simply messaging to her, but then what do I know. I know that Tucker revealed a great deal about himself in his interview w/Dr. Malone, and Tucker allowed Dr. Malone to do all the talking. It was a great interview. My hope is the same will happen w/Catherine.
As I have said several times -think professional wrestling and you won’t ever be surprised
That’s the way I describe it
People who think there is any difference between
A Republican and a Democrat are uneducated
I’d describe it as naïve. Even the most educated believe in fairy tells and wokeness.
Not surprised. Remember the way he covered the election the first time around? I was honestly surprised he even allowed anyone on his show to question the official narrative in the first place.
The corporate overlords would probably make damn sure they were on the shortest of leashes possible.
Everyone is playing a valuable part in these issues. I would rather have Carlson getting 95% of the news out daily than he mentions a few words and we lose him to less wide spread formats.
Yes, whatever happened to seal the deal for Lou Dobbs off the air and he has much freer hand at his discussions, what percentage of his previous viewing audience does he have now?
With the news media in the United States owned by six entities all on the WOKE Wagon including FOX it’s a miracle that we have Tucker Carlson each night. He’s intelligent and funny enough to draw more Democrats than any other cable news show. As you pointed out 95% of the loaf is better than none!
I Miss Lou Dobbs
Lou Dobbs has a show on Real America’s Voice.
Agreed.
But you can listen to him here (podcast)…
https://loudobbs.com/podcast/
Love Lou but boy is he wrong about Ukraine.
It’s a good thing to remember: everyone has their blind spot issues and nobody is perfectly informed.
Operation :
#Ripcord
Don’t be surprised if the DOJ does a full SWAT raid on the whole enterprise before anything else is released.
All in the name of national security and election integrity, of course.
I wonder if such a stunning accusation, and all of the political implications within it for both Fox News and Carlson, is going to lead to a response from Tucker Carlson tonight? Or is this coordinated PR truth-bending to stimulate more interest in the movie?
On one hand, I weary of the long lead up to some outfits/media/writers in releasing their information as it often seems to me as marketing the money angle into the info finally released. On the other hand, TPTB lie about everything.
I did see True The Vote is releasing all of their data:
HERE’S WHAT’S NEXT: True the Vote Is Going to Pull the “Ripcord” – They’re Releasing ALL of Their Data – Organize Your Teams Today — And Donate to TruetheVote.org (thegatewaypundit.com)
Nobody should donate ever again to any organization. Just like someone earlier stated…..I no longer trust anyone. Especially an “organization”. Haven’t found one that tells the truth. Your donations go to pay the big salaries for the A-H’s that work for them. They don’t do it for free. I It all comes from your donations.
In the case with True the Vote, however, I am not implying they are in it for the money; they have done the work that needs to be viewed, absorbed and understood by the masses.
Then let people decide just what really happened. Then donate if they choose.
Charitable giving is important. Organizations like Project Veritas, Judicial Watch, True The Vote, disaster relief, your house of worship… this Treehouse… many others.
Diligence is required, sure… however saying “Nobody should donate ever again to any organization”? Wow.
How long before we find out that the stifling of this story is the result of duress from the Biden Regime?
Remember what Neocon Fox news did to patriot Trish Regan? She should be commended and supported by all patriots for her sacrifice. The following is an excellent expose of Uniparty Fox News
Is The Fall Of Fox News Signaling The End of The Corporate News Era?
https://visionlaunch.com/is-the-fall-of-fox-news-signaling-the-end-of-the-corporate-news-era/
It was obviously Fox news policy.
It was also likely the only way Tucker was allowed to discuss the ballot harvesting issue with guest Catherine Englebrecht at all (don’t mention documentary).
I don’t watch his show (only see clips of interest when posted); but I think Tucker tried his best to report on this and bring it to the public’s attention under his employer’s restrictions.
.
Perhaps he should just casually mention that over 1999 people have been recorded stuffing ballot boxes . . . before his next story showing how a horse mating with a donkey produces a mule — which are always non-producing (sterile).
This is why 👉🏼👉🏼 Fox Bans Hosts from Covering D’Souza’s ‘2000 Mules’
https://www.toddstarnes.com/media/fox-bans-hosts-from-covering-dsouzas-2000-mules/
Don’t waste my time. That link says nothing about why “Fox Bans Hosts from Covering D’Souza’s ‘2000 Mules’”.
It’s just another copy of the tweet from DSouza.
Same for Newsmax:
News MAx has become a fake news outlet in my opinion. Maybe a couple decent shows..
They DO mention the stolen vote. I have watched many segments where various news hosts/esses openly say that stolen elections have consequences.
Newsmax is just Fox with less viewers. Newsmax made getting the clot shot a requirement for all of their employees including on air talent. Dinesh needs to be on OAN, Real America’s Voice, and even foreign media if they’ll have him.
Tucker is a msm regulator, everyone plays his or her part all controlled by money
The biggest story of a journalist’s life time: massive, proven presidential election fraud and Tucker is dancing around the fringes.
I recall him going ballistic on Sydney Powell over questioning of the Dominion machines.
CLEARLY he has been compromised regarding election fraud. Now you know what his FOX News leash is.
Like I’ve said, here’s the big change that will come from that documentary:
Next time, the mules will leave their cell phones at home.
How are they going to take their selfies dumping the ballots in the box? That’s how they get paid, per ballot but have to prove they were dropped off and inserted in the ballot box.
They won’t leave their cell phones home. They will just trying sneaking a little bit better.
Maybe they’ll just use a camera?
LOL! What a concept… a “camera.” Whoda’ thunk?
Gosh, let’s hope they don’t discover the very popular high definition pocket pen “spy” video cameras on eBay for less than $20. They’ll be able to get video proof, not just stills, far more covertly. And you’ll note they weren’t taking “selfies.”
Note that I am definitely not endorsing this, but the people paying them will be smart enough to figure this out anyway without my help.
“Next time, the mules will leave their cell phones at home.” If what I observe on a daily basis, that is unlikely. They won’t know how to function.
Hopefully the honest citizens won’t – and they’ll be recording video.
I watched and am still POd, all the cell and video and no Steal? USA was taken over by corrupt Gov workers, enabled by We The People? Whats next?
Fox must have Tucker on a short leash. Typical of controlled opposition. Allow him certain freedoms on certain topics, but when it comes to exposing the foundational fraud of the ‘election’ he’s not allowed to cross that line.
I used to hate the way Rush always trusted ‘Fox News’ throughout his career. Probably assuming that their eighties approach was still operative in the last decade or so.
Alternatively, Tucker could just be personally looking out for himself and his safety. No doubt he realizes the consequences of crossing that line from any number of sources.
Ever consider that even El Rushbo himself was controlled opposition?
I think Carlson is doing the best he can. The harsh ugly reality is that the scale of the vote fraud and the staggering damage and population replacement that has resulted from it delegitimize the very foundations of the republic. It would be unsurprising if Carlson’s bosses don’t want to go there.
They will, in the end, have no choice. The signal is real, and when the signal is real is cannot be stopped. It’s propagation may be slowed down at the cost of deepening perceptions of illegitimacy towards those doing the suppression. If the ruling class didn’t want destabilization then they shouldn’t have gotten on board with replacing our well-working federalism with crazy marxist multiculturalism, in exchange for higher profits and stock dividends. Everyone pays the price when rulers choose poorly.
There could have been a business reason why he did not mention the 2000 mule movie during the interview rather than politics. I think that it was a reasonable idea not to mention the movie during the interview because the Left would have claimed the whole purpose of the interview was to promote the movie to discredit the work she had done as an independent investigator. The movie has gotten plenty of publicity and is doing well. In my case the movie is just another piece of evidence that confirms what I have believed ever since the election. Tucker Carlson is a voice of reason and sanity in a storm of insanity and stupidity coming from the democrats and their propaganda organ the MSM. Folks rather than complaining because Tucker Carlson did an interview in a way you disagreed with. You all need to be concerned about the fact the new Nazi Party is running wild in the streets and the Brown shirts will be coming for all MAGA people next. Everyone needs to worry about what is coming in the Fall. Voting the democrat out of office is one thing actually getting them out is another.
Would like to give Carlson the benefit of the doubt, thinking the exclusion/censorship order came from the Fox Corporate BoD aka Paul Ryan; not intended to totally exonerate Carlson—trust, but verify.
The American People are under attack by those who want and need full control of the American people. We are in a war for our freedom. Our enemy faces jail or worse if they lose the war. It really isn’t any more complicated.
The People are winning little by little. The “Bad Guys” know they are losing and will pull all stops in an attempt to change the tide. One can only imagine the fear, desperation, and panic for those complicit. Propaganda is their only weapon and made possible by a controlled Media.
So he didn’t promote a movie telling us what we already know and paying 20 bucks for it. Carlson has however constantly talked about what happened during the 2020 election.
WHY – is this ballot-trafficking story not consistently aligned, validated and cross-referenced with Mike Lindell’s cyberwarfare info? There are three main strategies at work against the election systems of the Republic:
1 – Lawfare at the state and national levels as prep for the elections cheats and to defend them after the fact.
2 – The Dominion (etc) network systems attacks and analysis as shown by Lindell, et al, to have changed the tallies in real-time, at a level that did alter the outcome of the election.
3 – The ballot trafficking scheme as shown by D’Souza & Engelbrecht in 2000 Mules.
Clay & Buck wonder aloud, why the D’s (and the RINOs) are doubling down on stupid during the ’22 election cycle. I believe it’s because they still trust their cheats to carry the day.
Trump won. Everybody knows it. Fight’s on – NOW!
Coach DKR had a saying, “Dance with the one who brung you”; lot of folks haven’t been brung.
FYI: before he was a Longhorn, Coach Royal was a Husky. Go, Dawgs!
And before DKR coached a year at Washington, Coach Royal was formed and played his college career in Oklahoma, at OU. We still claim him– much to the Longhorn’s chagrin!
A Sooner QB, about the same time Frank Broyles was quarterbacking Georgia, tail-end of the ’40s.
… maybe the movie is on Hunter Biden’s laptop.
Carlson is a controlled voice.
All you needed to know about FNC you should have learned on Election Night 2020.
I is why I stopped watching Carlson. He is just a more palatable controlled voice and that is all it is.
It’s complicated business, Folks.
I expect there are plans to bring out the election fraud, with names of participants and quite frankly, more than was captured in the film, 2000 Mules.
Do you really believe, (think very carefully) that President Trump, (along with many others, some known, some unknown), would just let this election fraud and coup d’état fall flat and let it die a slow death to be ignored forever?
More is coming and sooner than we can imagine.
We will see what happens but the Fat Lady hasn’t starting warming-up.
It has been starkly demonstrated that the LAW and CONSTITUTION are being ignored or ‘bypassed’. Freedom in the USA is gone until THAT is fixed, or until THE PEOPLE rise up and fix it. Neither President Trump, nor anyone else can/will regain what is lost, without the return to THE RULE OF LAW.
Fox News was in on the steal…..remember? They called AZ with ten percent of the vote in…..in a state where Republicans greatly outnumber Dimwits….
Yep…I won’t ever watch them again
I watch Tucker sometimes but not on FOX.
i thought they called it at 1 %?
Tucker is big with the youngsters so this will get around social media and they will want to know what they are not allowed to hear about.
Of course Tucker can’t ethically go against his employer’s reasonable (legal) mandates but it just magnifies the story when a perceived free thinker like him is being muzzled. This isn’t the first time we have seen this situation with Tucker. He has been vilified before for similar events but maybe people should have noticed the spotlight he was shining wasn’t on himself but on the unspoken parts of the topic he was discussing
I hope this is a lasting shift in awareness.
.
Tucker Carlson is a mixed bag. He is a fabulously talented entertainer/opiner, and he has excellent writers. That said, my careful listening to him over the years has found “themes” that he tends to revert to, while short-shrifting others. He is not “us”. E.g. very arrogant-from-the-perch overmuch “sympathy” continually of those downtrodden lesser-educated etcs. in deplorable flyover country — somewhat excessive and I find it insulting as well as discounting the panoply of MAGA supporters. E.g. he’s a silverspoon baby and he sincerely doesn’t like what’s going on with the border — but his unstated reasons for that might not be quite what some assume.
That said, he’s the only thing I will watch on Fox.
.
Would you prefer he pretend to be salt of the Earth out of convenience like say Hillary? He is who he is, none of us got to choose our birth. Sad to say we need as many elite defectors as we can get (like a certain Donald Trump)
And what exactly are you implying are his actual reasons for disliking illegal border invasions? This is getting ridiculous.
Likely ordered to keep quiet by the leftist management, Paul Ryan, Murdochs, etc…
I’m disappointed in Tucker – the only show I make sure to watch nightly. He makes a point of always saying how lucky he is to work for a network that never tells him what he can or can’t talk about. I hope he addresses this.
I would point out that if the legal team blocked talking about the movie Tucker was still allowed to talk about the subject.
This actually seems like reasonably fair treatment from an employer. In these days I actually think that is a rare thing among big employers.
.
I have no doubt that Tucker/crew gave these instructions. Who else would have? Be that as it may, that does not tell us from where they originated. Not sure how Tucker will handle this (or ignore it) but I doubt that if the decision was made to not address the movie, how can he do it now, much less point the finger higher up.
.
One reason for this is because mentioning the title of the movie becomes an endorsement and advertisement for a product that has pay per view venues.
The content is what matters and Tucker exposed that to his audience and surely will again and again as the implications of its evidence spreads.
Dinesh has always sought to promote his work by tweaking noses, and Tucker is a paid employee, earning his paycheck.
Two people, doing what they do.
I don’t doubt it – I used to watch Tucker but his repeated statements that “vaccines are safe and effective” and that “we know the illegal votes weren’t enough to change the outcome of the election” pretty much solidified my impression that he’s controlled opposition.
Here’s a video about his past and connections:
https://odysee.com/Tucker-Carlson-Company-Man-Error-Fix:238a1ef20c9ca53f1820eb1b2099d5c799a12d21?src=embed
who’s truly shocked ?
I’ve known that Fox news was fake news since the 2008 election.
…someone is censored to avoid saying (and it is not profanity) ?:
ps
the someone is also been known to avoid the mention of the hunter laptop in the weeks prior to the 2020 election etc.
Its what they have been proven to do, repeatedly. [ sometimes due to political incorrectness, sometimes lawsuit has an untold gag order etc…. )
Thankfully, and count the blessings, that there are genuine ‘go to ‘ places for more facts, news (less censorship).
[ sadly, most people just want to turn on the tv or radio to get what they need to know – and its truncated news…even though a lot of the ‘news’ operates 24/7/365 ]
imho
Most likely that was an upper management demand, remember who took control after Megan Kelly’s take down of Rodger Ailes.
Lately, a lot of people have been slobbering with their love for Tucker, but right after 2020, I noticed that he was part of the crowd following the Fox mantra that there was nothing amiss and that Fox did nothing wrong in calling Arizona like they did. Now, he’s of the belief that there is something wrong?
I’ve always felt that his contrarian views were carefully scripted by corporate to give him street cred with us and I still believe that.
Like a broken clock, he’s right at least twice a day.
Chatsworth Osborne Jr.
Rush’s nickname for Tucker, remember?
I do remember; your post prompted me to look up the namesake, he was a character with a bowtie on the “The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis”; I remember there was such a TV program, but I didn’t watch TV during those years, so never saw it. Looks like he was probably a snob/democrat.
Tucker wanted the interview to be of substance and not about promotion of the movie. He left it out on purpose so as to not degrade the purpose of the subject nor the movie.
Tucker wants to appear old school journalism. That’s not possible these days, but at least he’s reaching out for it.
Otherwise, it would have looked like a commercial.
TC doesn’t own Fox.
He works for Fox.
Love TC all you want, or not.
Just realize that anything he says on Fox was approved by Fox.
And all omissions are required by Fox.
TC is a highly paid entertainer. Nothing more.
CUT THE CORD!
Good ol’ Tucker. Still to the left of center.
The movie link was posted by CFP already.
I’m guessing Tucker talking about it would be a red line for Fox News, not Tucker. In any event, once people see it, it will enter back into the news.
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/2000-mules-watch-the-full-movie/
I noticed this and CE seemed a little off put during the interview. They could have shown videos of the actual mules dropping hand fulls of ballots and instead all they showed was videos of normal one ballot/person in the daytime.
Wonder if Tucker was told to do this…even though he’s claimed no one at FOX instructs him.
Did Fox awfulicials forbid Tucker to say it? They were the ones who called Arizona first to put Sleepy, the cornhusk sock puppet over the 271 mark. Are they in jeopardy of being sued for lying???
Was Fox aiding and abetting in the fraud that
installed the illegitimate regime we are now suffering from?
I am one who believes they need CONTROVERSY to exist, CNN FOX ABC NBC CBS and all their alter egos on the TEE VEE.
Look at them telling use how horrible ugly and disguising our world is! They speak lies they falsely accuse they judge not being judges they committee slander they boast about their evil. Sure late me pay attention to what they say.
Proverbs says a lot about how to us our mouths to speak. I for one will reread it, because i am just as
guilty.
‘A dishonest man spreads strife and whisperer separates close friends’
‘There are six things that the Lord hates, seven are an abomination to him, a lying tongue and hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breaths out lies and one who sows discord among brothers’
Loren: Agree. False or hyped controversy is one of the tried and true promotional tool of the entertainment industry, and TV news is entertainment. Nothing more than content, broadcast to viewers, with advertising time, sold to advertisers.