A group of medical researchers filed a FOIA request for the documents the FDA relied upon to approve the Pfizer vaccine. There are approximately 330,000 pages of documents from the Emergency Use Authorization process and trial. The FDA responded by saying they did not want to provide the documents or the data. A lawsuit was triggered.
The FDA said they would produce batches of 500 documents per month that will take 55 more years for full production {LINK}. A judge ordered a timed release of the data, and two months after the lawsuit was filed, the first release took place two weeks ago. The FDA produced the first 91 pages of the more than 329,000 pages potentially responsive to the FOIA request. The findings, taken directly from the produced documents, are cited here and discussed below.
The time period covered (‘reporting interval’) is from December 1, 2020, to February 28, 2021, approximately three months of data from the FDA, showing adverse events (AE) from the vaccine rollout. “It is estimated that approximately [REDACTED] doses of BNT162b2 were shipped worldwide from the receipt of the first temporary authorisation for emergency supply on 01 December 2020 through 28 February 2021,” the document states.
Unfortunately, the FDA redacted the total number of vaccinations that took place during the three month window, citing national security. However, the FDA did provide the number and type of serious ‘Adverse Event’ reports which took place during the three months.
The total number of vaccinations during the three months is unknown.
Pfizer received a total of 42,086 reports containing 158,893 “events.”
1,223 people died as a result of the vaccine.
2.90% of the serious adverse events reported resulted in death of the patient. That is a ratio of one death per 34 serious adverse events.
QUESTIONS: How many vaccinations did Pfizer distribute globally *after* February 28, 2021?
Was the scale of Pfizer vaccine distribution significantly higher after the initial period discussed above?
If all of this government mandated vaccination activity is being done “for the public good“, why are those same government officials not publicly transparent with the vaccination data? What information is needed in order to create “informed consent”?
This is criminal. In fact, this is crime against humanity. And the US FDA, CDC, NIH, and therefore Fauci, are criminals. They’re now trying to abuse FOIA to conceal their crimes. They have all those pages: they should be forced to disclose all of them immediately.
How many thousands of people do they know that they have MURDERED? How many hundreds of thousands who trusted them have they MAIMED?
Thousands of counts … all of them “in the First Degree.”
A friend just sent this – it must have been a kid who noticed it. Always from the mouth of a child to notice the emperor has no clothes.
I don’t know if someone has mentioned this yet? If the virus spreads from country to country, then it’s obviously the vaccinated people who are spreading it, because only they can fly, right?
I recommend the book The Truth About Contagion Exploring Theories of How Disease Spreads by Thomas S. Cowan
and Sally Fallon Morell. This whole charade is entirely political and despicable.
Phenomenal book. It changed my medical career.
How the hell are the number of vaccines distributed during that 3 month time frame
” national security” ?
because of the “sensitivity of the matter” (they were committing treason and are scared to let you know)
Friend’s husband went to the hospital yesterday. Blood clot. Vaccinated. He got sent home with blood thinners. Probably a really common occurrence now. 😢
BIL yesterday..same
Father in law, two months ago. Was told he’s now prone to them, due to age.
Mind you, this was an 80 year old man who worked out five days a week who is suddenly prone to them. He was just allowed to go back to the gym a few weeks ago.
Once you have one, you are always prone to them from what my doctors told me during my recovery from a DVT.
I had a clot in my leg a few years ago. They keep me in the hospital 5 days over Thanksgiving. Blood thinners. Lovenox shots and weekly labs for months. Not something I plan to repeat…..hence I remain pureblood.
Who in their right mind sees 1,223 deaths post jab and continues on jabbing men, women AND children without blinking an eye.
Other vaccines were halted with just single digit deaths but not COVID
Why?
This is why 7 Billion people IMO should consider pursuing Crimes Against Humanity.
Follow up question…….
How many of these adverse reaction deaths already had natural immunity?
Meaning they were safe from the virus all along but in the end not necessarily so from possibly the jab?
Hi Bogeyfree, I think you’re maybe misinterpreting the data. That 1223 number (along with most all the other “adverse effect” data) is what was reported by people throughout the world via various public reporting mechanisms, e.g., VAERS. If someone died a day, a week, or a month after getting a shot, (like maybe Hank Aaron who died 17 days later at age 86), they would likely report it, whether or not they could conclusively determine if it was a direct result of the shot. (That’s what you want people to do so data analysts can look for bona fide correlations.)
In most or all of those 1223 cases, it likely wasn’t related to the shot. There had been ~100M Pfizer shots administered by the reporting date, Feb 28, so it’s reasonable to assume that a significant number of those 100M died of natural causes (or quite possibly covid).
Keep in mind that Pfizer ran 10’s of thousands of people thru clinical trials and didn’t report even one death. Same for Moderna. J&J saw one death (and almost several more), so temporarily halted the things till they could figure out it was associated with a rare, but known type of vaccine allergic response that is very treatable if prepared for it.
https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/
Found in the bin… 🙁
RICO…
which is why they spend decades recruiting John Robert like TOOLS into every position to judge, vote, or enforce.. before they launched their insurrection.
there is no RICO. we have a bunch of rabbits, SCARED To leave the coming HARVEST
if we don’t learn how to communicated effectively, and start doing it with EACH OF US we are going to have continued issues.
———————
Those stickers of Joe saying “I did that” is a VERY EFFECTIVE TOOL. the stickers of “Biden didnt Win” is a very effective tool.
———————-
We must FIGHT this way, EACH OF US, or this information in this article is MEANINGLESS because it isnt getting conveyed.
————
example of a sticker —-> ” FDA pre-approves the Pfizer vaccine, and agrees to review the data in 2067″
—————–
https://4thamendmentrestored.com/f/fight-on-the-field-of-language-its-a-thin-curtain-an-illusion
Nuremberg 2.0.
In Dec 2020, there were already 392 deaths by Pfizer alone, so how was this s#@t not pulled off the market after the first month?!
Now we find out that the CDC and FDA knew this all along, and decided that 1,223 officially admitted to casualties are not a big deal. And those are the already massaged and scrubbed numbers, undeniable, or else Pfizer would have swept them under the carpet, too, like so much else. And yet, amazingly, when you run a report on VEARS using the same parameters, Dec 202 till Feb 2021, the number of people killed by the Pfizer jab comes up to 4,550.
This was never more true that now – WHO is WATCHING the WATCHMEN?!?!?!
The CDC, FDA are no different than the EPA, Supreme Court, Congress, DOJ: bureaucrats. Push papers around to make new piles out of old piles and go play golf then go to dinner.
Hi Polk8dot,
I think you may be misinterpreting the data.
There’s no indication that those 1223 deaths were a direct cause of the vaccine.
Please see my comments about this here:
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/12/03/fda-released-first-batch-of-vaccine-authorization-documents-showing-pfizer-vaccine-resulted-in-1223-fatalities-in-first-three-months/#comment-8325994
it’s the standard left-wing mob playbook. Steal votes, murder people and block all damning evidence via the courts
This is civil war stuff.
Is the CDC even officially a part of our Federal Gooberment? And, if not why is the Gooberment allowing them to make policies? I have been told they are not.
1,223 people died as a result of the vaccine.
That’s simply not true. As noted in the FDA doc, that number’s just an accounting of entries made to the “adverse effect” reporting system (VAERS). But it doesn’t mean the vaccine was the cause of those deaths. It only means that that many people were reported to have died a day, a week, or a month after taking the vaccine. The true cause of death may have been the vaccine … or natural causes or even covid itself (since a single dose only provides a modest level of protection).
Yes, the total number of doses administered is redacted, but that can be looked up. For example, this site has a neat graph that shows about 30M doses administered by Feb 28. So 42k reports of some adverse effect and 1223 reports of death is pretty small. And take any group of 30M people, and it’s likely a significant number of them will die of natural causes within a week or so.
I’m interested in your argument.
so I have questions:
where did you arrive at vaers as the source for the data?
day, week, month? how did you come to this range of periods?
you mention a site (30M doses by 2/28)..please provide a link ..where is it?
you state “can” attribute the chances of “other” being the cause and that it is likely a “significant number will die of nat causes within a “week or so” – that seems to be a vague and very general assumption about correlation of deaths. Additionally, 42K cases of adverse effects out of 30M (I am assuming this is what you meant), but again context is everything and until we resolve where you are getting this 30M number, there is no means to evaluate the claim.
serious inquiry…please show your work.
Awesome questions, regitiger, thanks.
In the FDA doc, section 3.13, p.16. VAERS is actually one of a number of data collection sources. For convenience, here’s part of 3.13:
The company’s AESI [adverse effect of special interest] list takes into consideration the lists of AESIs from the following expert groups and regulatory authorities: Brighton Collaboration (SPEAC), ACCESS protocol, US CDC (preliminary list of AESI for VAERS surveillance), MHRA (unpublished guideline).
Reporting systems don’t limit when a potential side effect manifests for you to be able to report it. This is actually one beauty of the system: it’s best if everyone reports any strange thing that’s happened to them, whether or not they believe it to be related to the vaccine and regardless of when it manifested. Then the data analysts can look for patterns (or correlation in stats-speak). Most will turn out to be uncorrelated; but some will, and thats’s the gold. For example, a Google data scientist noticed a pattern of searches for eye aches and pains spiking in areas of high covid outbreaks, so postulated it was a covid symptom. Later, the medical community acknowledged that. Another example: Hank Arron died 17 days after his first covid shot. Was that reported to VAERS? Probably. (That would be a good thing). Does that mean he died of the vaccine? (Not likely; he was 86, after all. In fact, not related, according to the GA medical examiners office, but one is free to seek a 2nd opinion.)
Oh, sorry, the “this site” text above is actually a link, but doesn’t show up in blue so not obvious. Here’s the link:
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-vaccine-doses-by-manufacturer?country=~European+Union
Yeah, kinda hand-wavy; I take your point. But the math would require hunting down all the data for death rates for different age groups, then integrating over the dosage period profile, then seeing if the 1223 is greater than the average death rate. Perhaps once the 30M number is accepted, the likelihood that 1223 people out of that group, (most of which are older and many of which may have underlying conditions as per the priority list of who got to be first in line for the shot), might die of natural causes or even covid itself might not seem so unreasonable.
Looks like I had EU selected when copying that link. Here’s for the US:
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-vaccine-doses-by-manufacturer?country=~USA
That’s 38M by end of Feb. So worldwide might be ~100M
thank you for your reply.
if it is 30M, and I have no reason to doubt it is, 1223 does appear to be trivial.
but more to point as you have noted, correlation here based on vaers has not been established.
separately, yes, we need more of those national security protected documents don’t we?
respectfully,
regitiger
This wasn’t the Vaers report. This was Pfizer’s records.
As I read it, per 3.1.3, Pfizer collected that data from VAERS and several other lists from other regulatory agencies.
Are you maybe reading that a bit differently?
The article states that the FDA redacted the total number of vaccinations that took place during the three month window, citing national security.
Can anyone point to a source for this info. I’ve been looking around and haven’t been able to find it.