Kyle Rittenhouse shot and killed Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber as he was being attacked by a raging mob. Rittenhouse also fired on Gaige Grosskreutz as the attacker held a handgun toward him. Prosecutors and U.S. corporate media attempted to claim that Rittenhouse was a vigilante looking for a fight; however, the defense, and all video of the events, show all shootings were justifiable self-defense.
If the history of tracking the ¹DOJ-CRS results in a repeat of previous patterns within high-profile cases, the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict is likely to come today. Consider this an open discussion thread for the verdict or any activity in the trial.
¹The DOJ-CRS is the least known quasi-legislatively approved agency within the justice department. The CRS is the Community Relations Service, and is a very secret division within the DOJ civil rights unit. The activity of the CRS is rarely discussed, but essentially the agency is authorized to reach into any court proceeding, local, state or federal, and modify/guide the proceedings under the auspices of maintaining national racial harmony.
“The Community Relations Service (CRS), a component of the Department of Justice (DOJ), serves as “America’s Peacemaker” for communities in conflict by mediating disputes and enhancing community capacity to independently prevent and resolve future conflicts.” (read more)
An RSBN team is stationed in Kenosha today (November 18), to give updates on the Wisconsin v. Kyle Rittenhouse trial.
Yeah, sure. The defense attorney is talking about it in the hall and he overhears him. Sure. This is a psychological game.
Election Wizard
@ElectionWiz
WATCH: A Newsmax source reports that they overheard Kyle Rittenhouse’s attorney saying that he believed
THe jury is at a 6-6 split.
(VidEo linked in tweet)…
6 blind idiots
If it’s truly a 6-6 split or even anything other than 11-1, they’ll NEVER reconcile and it will be declared a mistrial for not being able to reach a verdict
That’s on the jury side
On the judge side, he may still rule a mistrial on procedural issues, perhaps even with prejudice
One likely candidate issue is not sharing hi-resolution video with the defense, witholding it to finally show it in final argument or even further: final argument rebuttal
No expertise here, just brainstorming
I just heard that the prosecution knew who the headkicker in the tape was and did not disclose it to the defense. The reckless endangerment charge was relted to the shots fired when he was kicked in the head, although that also seems like self defense to me.
Right. UK Daily Mail had an article, and Tucker talked about it tonight.
Didn’t the morbidly obese Prosecutor insist that Kyle should have gotten into a boxing match with head-kicker.
Blind-side head kicking coward.
And where was the Defense on this? Could they not go seek and find the head kicker? That guy needs to be charged. Grosschuck hasn’t been charged for attempted murder. His second DUI is over at GWP.
How come no one else talks about the sheer volume of other AR 15’s and guns at the riots. It wasn’t just Kyle.
Seriously. Unfreakinbelievable people are that lost. No sense of honesty left in half of this country. These people and their moral standards are a punchline, and the sane people are made to pay time and again for their ignorance and self-loathing.
I have been expecting that the judge would be notified if some of the jurors are allowing the fear of being doxxed or harmed to influence their decision. Then the judge could replace them from the six alternates.
If a Karen is the foreman, that would explain why this has not happened. It is probably HER that is doing that.
If the jury is hung, the judge would poll them all to ask, wouldn’t he? That would give some of the others to speak up.
you might have the right reason, a liberal as the foreman could really hang up a jury.
Any juror can ask to talk to the judge. I don’t think the jurors have to get Karen’s permission – especially if it concerned Karen. If they wanted to report her for doing “research” tonight or even looking up words in the dictionary (which will have general usage and not legal definitions), they could hardly go through her.
Just open the door to the jury room, and tell the jury bailiff sitting outside that he wanted to talk to the judge.
Might be interesting if a majority of the jurors decided they wanted a new foreperson. No reason why they can’t have a vote on that.
There is a desperate need to do the right thing, obviously….however, it is also true that if any of them are NOT afraid of being doxxed or harmed, that suggests they are completely out of touch with reality.
Since police departments are no longer a sure thing, in terms of enforcing the law, I think it makes perfect sense if some of them are afraid of voting for acquittal. That is a completely predictable consequence of lawlessness.
Your point is entirely understandable, and I state the following in no way condemning your logic, but any person with a desire for self-preservation and the preservation of our country as a whole in the long term, must understand that a vote to acquit provides legal cover for the jurors of Kenosha and beyond to protect themselves in the event they’re attacked by these pantifa weeLM types. In the larger picture, voting to convict is much more dangerous for the average person in this country. It may satisfy and allay the actions of a few to wrongly convict, but it will empower many to act to acquit.
Then they should admit their fears and say they can’t do it, let an alternate have their seat.
If there happens to be a gross miscarriage of justice and KR is somehow found ‘guilty’ against any of the charges brought against him, then we get to go out and burn cities down, riot, loot, assault, murder, attack police and cause general widespread mayhem and chaos without any consequence – correct?!
What’s good for goose and all that.
Actually, I wonder if it is OK for us now to threaten the lives of the jurors who want to convict Kyle?
https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/11/rittenhouse-verdict-watch-has-jury-foreperson-gone-rogue-and-holding-back-acquittal/
Very insightful.. He makes a good point that the Karen’s social circle probably knows she’s on the jury, and she would be exiled to social Siberia if she voted for acquittal.
The “Woke White Women” mobs are very opinionated and VERY bossy! I know several and they are very quick to virtue signal about how tolerant and inclusive they are but they will turn on a dissenter like a pack of hyenas on a litter of baby bunnies! They live in million dollar homes, in gated communities, often with private security patrolling their streets BUT, as they will tell you they are VERY sympathetic to the plight of “minorities” and “immigrants” (as long as no one suggests that any of them be relocated to THEIR neighborhood)!
“Consuela has cleaned my house for years and we ALSO use a minority owned landscaping company and we give them both an extra $100 at Christmas…they are like family to us, you know!”
Legal Insurrection was pretty trustworthy back during the Zimmerman persecution, near as I could tell
His “single holdout juror” premise is 100% at odds with the 6-6split rumor, I’ll note
That is who I have been using to follow this case. He is a self defense lawyer. He knows his stuff.
I was on a jury trial in New York City with one of these. Everyone thought the thief was guilty as Cain — but a lone Long Island Jewish liberal female, insufferably SMUG and self-righteous, decided she was going to be the Lone Defender of this poor black man (his victim was also black, but never mind!).
The judge couldn’t BELIEVE we couldn’t come to a verdict. This beeyotch absolutely GLORIED in standing off the whole jury: thought she was bloody “Horatio at the bridge,” she did. The evidence was incontrovertible.
She hung the ____ jury. In the elevator, she looked at me and said, with smug amusement, “You don’t like me very much, do you?”
“NO.” The beeyotch just smiled. Heard my Southern accent, and no doubt went home to Long Island and bragged to all her lefty pals about how she’d defeated a “Southern bigot”…. it still chaps my hide to think about it.
A computer scientist and I tag-teamed this broad with facts and logic and reason until we were blue in the face: the more we argued with her, the more she got off on her heroine act. Tellingly, she didn’t say anything to HIM in the elevator; he was a fellow New Yorker.
Expecting liberals to adhere to logic and reason is a fool’s errand
… not to cast an aspersion on you, more as an item of learned experience to inform future events
I’ve stopped arguing with liberals
You both get muddy and the liberal enjoys it
With this case like the OJ trail it was never about the evidence, they could have found Nicole’s head under his bed and he would have walked , this Rittenhouse Jury has been tampered with from day one , you can tell with the prosecutions caviler attitudes,
the best we can hope for is hung , hung works in Kyle’s favor because of all the sht that’s come out on Grosskreutz, and pedophile Rosenbaum nut case , FBLies has been exposed , MSM won’t have the spin anymore , the crookeds have one shot at this, .
If we got a 6 -6 split that’s been floating will find some staunch hold outs for acquittal , hopelessly deadlocked bla bla bla …
We’ve had all these years since OJ to remedy this BS. Lady Justice now in tears.
When they’re not being intimidated by sitting politicians (Maxine Waters in Chauvin) they’re being clearly nudged in a particular direction (Governor calling out the guard very conspicuously), and threatened with doxxing/exposure (NBC today, but plenty of this sh*t happens in other trials), or outright being threatened with riots (BLM with Chauvin, Kenosha, or any trial).
There goes the jury box. We have one box left, by my count.
I’m still amazed the judge let the prosecutor get away with sweeping the jury with apparently unsecured rifle without any trigger discipline at all. Just bizarre. It wasn’t until after the idea clicked that it could be activating the propaganda brainwashing they’d been getting for over a year from the media.
As to the remaining box, God bless Kyle for his efficiency and safety with that. He paid a high price, notwithstanding this circus, as a G0d-fearing young man. One can see clearly it weighs on him.
He did that on purpose to scare the jury, to emphasize his point how dangerous and scary the rifle was.