The U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans has ruled against the Joe Biden OSHA vaccine mandate calling it “staggeringly overbroad.”
[The 22-page ruling and opinion is AVAILABLE HERE]
The three judge panel upheld its previous decision to put a stay on the order by Joe Biden against companies with 100 workers or more. The Biden administration had instructed the Department of Labor to require COVID-19 vaccines. The Biden administration’s effort to use an Emergency Temporary Standard OHSA rule was rejected by the court citing numerous flaws in their review and ruling:
(Continue reading via pdf)
“The mandate is a one-size-fits-all sledgehammer that makes hardly any attempt to account for differences in workplaces (and workers),” Circuit Court Judge Kurt Engelhardt wrote for the panel.
Oops! White House Chief Of Staff Ron Klain’s Retweet Cited In Ruling Against VAXX Mandate
https://conservativeplaybook.com/2021/11/12/oops-white-house-chief-of-staff-ron-klains-retweet-cited-in-ruling-against-vaxx-mandate/
Thanks Ron! I guess you’re not nearly as smart as your parents, teachers and law school professors said you were!
He’s one of the names that comes up when there is speculation on who is actually pulling Joe’s strings.
Him, and Susan Rice.
Oh! Don’t forget Obama! His fingerprints are all over the results of this failing administration. Fortunately for America, our Constitution is a mighty fortress in times of strife.
OB isn’t smart enough to be a puppeteer – he was also controlled by others.
Klain is really just a consigliere for the Globalist Ruling Class.
Hoist by his own petard.
What is so cool about this is the left is going bonkers over it. These are the same people who, for four years, accused President Trump of agreeing explicitly with every tweet he re-tweeted, yet now say it’s unfair to hold Ron Klain to that standard. I love the smell of a Marxist meltdown in the morning.
I’m wondering what happens with the rest of the states suits. They were filed in more than one Appeals Court . Do the other Courts still rule?
I’m no lawyer, nor even an American, but from what I’ve read about other US cases in the past, it seems likely the other Circuits may rule separately on motions filed before them, and if/when the Circuits disagree, it would get appealed to the Supreme Court.
I have no idea how it works if another Circuit rules that the mandate should NOT be enjoined, after this court has already issued a stay. Logically it ought to remain prohibited so long as at least one court has a stay in place, but these things don’t always follow logic!
Random Aussie, my heart goes out to you guys down under.
We are collectively f’in up the narrative. We are failing in our rhetoric to make the necessary difference. Why? Because we are stuck on being right about the wrong things.
There is indeed tyrannical behavior in our government. Are we missing the issue? I think we may be.
While there is perhaps a mass tragedy of iatrogenic death and malpractice, and there is certainly a Global Pandemic, it is not a pandemic of viral illness. Excess singular death by virus is hard find. There is a >98% recovery rate in the instance of CV19. The Pandemic is something else.
So then, if so, what are we missing?
The Global Pandemic is a pandemic of incompetence; an epidemic of grotesque and staggering administrative incompetence. We have a Global Pandemic of Incompetent Administrators causing an Epidemic of Malignant Administration.
REPEAT: A Global Pandemic of Incompetent Administrators causing an Epidemic of Malignant Administration.
They have infected and diseased the governments of our world, have gravely wounded and may yet kill Liberty and Democracy if we allow these incompetent fools to operate the mechanisms of government. They are but a Cult of Fools. They come out of cookie-cutter university programs and global leadership indoctrination programs. The WEF has placed over 1,000 into elective and senior government service around the world.
It doesn’t matter if they are dupes. It doesn’t matter if they are controlled by invisible dark authorities giving them instruction and diktat. It’s a distinction that makes no difference. We’ve got to get the rhetoric right so more sensible people can coherently and comfortably set the ship of state right.
Our governments are a precious resource on which hundreds of millions of human lives depend. When they become infested with Incompetent Administrators and begin to present clinically as a Malignant Administration, these are the terms we need to use and perhaps must use to communicate the greater problem.
Bitching about “government tyranny” might be a reasonable summary, but it puts little-to-no heat on the incompetent and malignant individuals who have metastasized within our governments otherwise filled with good and loving people. They too are trapped in this madhouse of incompetence and malignant administrative culture. We also owe them our loyalty and support. They are government too. We are the government too.
People are doing this. Those who are doing this all have names.
Incompetent Administrators. Malignant Administrations.
Incompetent. Incompetent. Incompetent. It’s the Administrators.
They are but a Cult of Fools.
We must use rhetoric that works. We must use rhetoric that tells it like it is.
If we cannot be effective and rise to help the good people in our governments to win the internal arguments and prevail over the individual incompetence and malice responsible for the spectacular maladministration of the COVID fiasco, our governments will continue to be exploited interlopers and incompetent administrators for their self-serving malignant and corrupt purposes.
Please don’t call what is evil “incompetent.” They know EXACTLY what they’re doing, and everything is going just as planned.
If you keep believing the people calling the shots are merely inept, you’ve already lost the war because incompetent people can be changed. History indicates that tyrants will not change. They believe they’re right and we’re wrong, so guess who will change . . . or die?
Sundance wrote about this just a few weeks ago.
Incompetent: “not having or showing the necessary skills to do something successfully”. FJB & the Global leaders are obviously void of reality, brainwashed and willfully not knowing. There are no Good-Guys Calvary amassing to save the day. The Churches too are void of grasping today’s horrors – they mostly spew empty, non-relevant words from the pulpit while Rome is burning – again.
Oversimplification for purpose of misdirection. These global goons know *exactly* what they’re doing, including the ‘churches’.
Evil and incompetence are far from mutually exclusive. Incompetence is generally a byproduct of poor discipline and weak moral fiber. What we may see as evil is simply the incompetent acting out to hide it’s incompetence and failure. Incompetence itself may not be evil, but when combined with pride, power and arrogance, it’s a recipe for the perfect tyrant.
So many of the vaxxed know they have been duped. Their shame is easier to bear if you too are duped. They will push those same lies that they were told upon you. This is fundamental to humans throughout all of history.
My cousins are all onboard, even the two Repubs, who are usually the sensible ones. They have been completely brainwashed and frightened out of their wits, and NONE of them have done any independent research or thinking about any of it.
We’re living amongst people in the grips of a mass hysteria of unprecedented depth and duration — created by the evil Media Machine.
Agreed in the sense that we need to tmreky less on the medical technicalities of a middling virus and focus on the real pandemic of government overreach trending to tyranny.
Complete mischaracterization and deliberate misdirection by no doubt one of the enemy; some fed behind a keyboard. Don’t fall for this crap. Govts around the globe are engaged in a global takeover by deliberate design, not by incompetence. Whoever this guy is, he’s not on our side.
Not a lawyer either, but an attorney once explained to me:
There are many dozen U.S. Judicial Districts, each defined by mapped boundaries. For example, the Eastern, Western, Northern and Southern Districts of Texas try cases arising within their boundaries. Small population states, e.g. Wyoming, Vermont, Alaska and Montana have only one U.S. District Court, but single-district states that are geographically large have federal courthouses two or more different cities.
The District Courts are trial courts. They hold civil and criminal trials for torts and crimes committed in their geographic zones that involve alleged violations of federal law. Their judges are required to adhere to rulings made by their overseeing Circuit Courts of Appeal, and by the Supreme Court.
There are 13 Circuit Courts of Appeal, most of which cover several states and several-to-many Federal Judicial Districts. For example the Fifth Circuit hears appeals of District Court rulings from Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi’s combined nine judicial districts.
The District of Columbia is unique in having its own single U.S. District Court and Circuit Court of Appeals, in Washington, D.C.
Technically, unless the Supreme Court has made a nationally-binding ruling, each Circuit Court of Appeals is authorized to set its own precedents, which then govern its District Courts judges’ rulings.
Sometimes different Circuits hearing similar cases issue conflicting findings. If the Fifth Circuit issues a ruling conflicting with a Ninth Circuit ruling, District judges in Dallas may cite and comment on the Ninth Circuit’s ruling, but ultimately must obey the Fifth Circuit’s ruling, while San Francisco District judges must adhere to the Ninth Circuit’s ruling. In order to ignore their own Circuit’s judgments, District judges must cite Supreme Court rulings. This rarely occurs–if ever– as it would impugn the authority, integrity and judicial competence of their own supervisory Court of Appeals judges.
Circuit appeals of District Court rulings are initially heard by a 3-judge panel. The losing party may then petition for his case to be re-heard by the entire Circuit Court, generally 11 to 13 judges (en banc review). If such petition is denied, or is granted with affirmation of the 3-judge panel’s judgment, the losing party may then appeal to the Supreme Court.
If all Circuits that have judged a matter issue concurring rulings, any dissatisfied litigant may appeal his case to the Supreme Court, but SCOTUS is not required to hear the case (grant certiorari), and often declines to hear it. It is only when Circuit Courts have issued conflicting rulings that SCOTUS is forced to hear somebody’s appeal on a matter, in order to maintain consistency of federal laws’ interpretation and application.
This is what a lawyer told me, IIRC.
Random Aussie, what you have to understand is that our court system is infested with Communist Judges. THEY rule on their feelings and what is good for the Commies in the Democrap party, it’s that simple.
Every once in a while a court does the RIGHT thing. In this case the 5th court is majority conservative.
The other issue is that Biden is so arrogant he thinks he is the King an everyone must do what he says or he puts them into Jail (re: Jan 6 people held in prison with NO charges filed). The sooner these Communists are done away with (choose the method), WE and Australia will be FREE again!
PS. There is NO way in HELL WE will ever give up our GUNS!
You said: “I have no idea how it works…”
Aussie, thanks for all your support, but unfortunately seems nobody “knows how it works” here in America anymore.
They’re changing the rules every day. Whatever works best for them. Damn the Law.
We’re no longer under the Rule of the Law, but the Rule of the Strongmen.
We need to think about how to survive and resist in this new environment. Our legal system, like VAERS, has become a sort of Potemkin village — mostly for show, not use.
It is probable that the 5th Circuit en banc will now rule, and possibly overrule the 3 judge panel.
Other Circuit Courts of Appeal are not bound by other Circuit Court opinions. Arguably this opinion only applies to businesses in the 5th Circuit, but during the federal judiciary’s attack on Trump phase lower federal district courts were routinely issuing nationwide injunctions, so presumably the 5th Circuit could do likewise.
As you can see the liberal abuse of judicial power has the potential for a constitutional crisis if you have two circuit courts issuing conflicting nationwide rulings. The US Supreme Court would have to intervene.
Another thing liberal federal judges started during the Trump era, which is coming back to bite them, is for the court to consider public pronouncements from the President as evidence of intent. Oh well. Historically public pronouncements were consider merely political statements and had no effect on divining intent.
Now if we could get state courts to make similar rational rulings, about never ending “emergencies” and narrowly tailored governor orders.
I highly doubt the entire 5th circuit will overrule. They have a history of rendering opinions that are proper such as this one. Will keep our fingers crossed. Agree, the 5th circuit ruling applies to the states in the 5th circuit (TX, LA and MS I believe) and others may issue conflicting opinions which would might apply to their circuits (see 9th circuit history of implementing stays nationally). In addition to Klain’s retweet, I found it funny that the ruling also cited Biden’s flip flop on mandates. As you said, the move to consider Presidential political statements as evidence of intent when Trump made them just came back to bite Brandon…..er…….Biden.
Circuit-issued “nationwide” injunctions are happening more frequently of late, and something that Justice Thomas seriously dislikes and has said needs fixing.
Seems to me that national injunctions are only done (inappropriately) by liberal judges legislating from the bench.
Like the Hawaii Obama judge that shutdown President Trump’s Muslim terrorist refugee ban (which was an immigration law not an EO). The federal judge in Hawaii was a classmate of Obama and the shutdown was nationwide!
The really insane thing was that the Trump administration obeyed it. Can you imagine a lefty Administration bowing to some judge in South Carolina? the mind boggles…
He knows they are acting “ultra vires” — outside of their proper jurisdiction/scope of power.
Thank you for the article, Sundance. I haven’t seen one word said about this anywhere else in the media. It is refreshing to know there are still some courts that aren’t corrupt and are willing to adhere to Constitutional law. Bravo to the Patriots in the Court. This is a huge defeat for the Obiden Communist Party & Dr. Mengele Fauci. I hope this paves the way for Biden sycophant-run businesses who insist on proceeding with the mandates to lose their shirts in class action lawsuits by workers who lose their jobs. No business has the right to force its employees to become lab rats in the CDC/ Mengele Phase 3 clinical trials. Keep your eyes open, patriots because these Communist CEOs are all being exposed. As consumers, we also have the power to refuse their products & services and make them suffer even more.
Oh to be an ambulance chasing lawyer now! The class action lawsuits are going to be epic and cripple or destroy many a woke business.
And yes, we should quit buying from or using the services of any business that punishes it’s employees for not submitting to tyranny.
Uh, this ruling says nothing about a business’ right to mandate a vaccine.
I believe any business can do so as long as state law does not disallow it.
True but would not EEOC laws take place? What business has ability to mandate invasive health measure’s without a Woke Govt backing?
From EEOC
“ Federal Laws Protect You Against Employment Discrimination During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Federal laws protect you against employment discrimination. This Fact Sheet explains how these laws provide rights that can help protect you at work during the COVID-19 pandemic. They are especially important if you are being harassed, if you are “high-risk” and need extra protection from getting sick, if your employer is not allowing you to work, or if you need a modification of your employer’s COVID-19 safety requirements. These laws protect you from retaliation for asserting your (or your coworkers’) rights to be free from discrimination.”
https://www.eeoc.gov/federal-laws-protect-you-against-employment-discrimination-during-covid-19-pandemic
The ruling cited federal law violated by the mandate and also where the osha rule contradicted previous osha standards. So a business making this mandate would also be violating the same laws and standards. This ruling lays out why anyone imposing a mandate will lose in court
The MSM is the primary ENEMY followed closely behind by our republican “representatives”
And the absolute first step in repositioning our Constitution as Supreme law of the land is a national antenna accessible broadcast television network. Millions of voters and potential voters don’t have access to CTH, TGP, PN, etc. and don’t have time to get news information except from MSM; therefore mislead and lied to. The starting point is the truth, and at present there is not a way to get the truth to the citizenry
Kinda like “Radio Free Europe”… and we all saw how that worked out. Anyway, we already have NPR… and we, the taxpayers, actually PAY for it!
The ENEMEDIA= MSM
So you place Republicans ahead of the demonrats on the villian list. Interesting (and telling).
Yet here in NY the normal Purebloods are being treated like third class citizens in many places.
What about all the businesses that now require proof of injection?
In NY City for example, you can’t eat indoors, use the gym, go to indoor events, attend a concert, etc. etc. unless you have the shot.
Outside of the City we have some venues where it’s the same deal. I can’t go to my local theater to see a live show because I don’t have the shot.
And don’t get me started on the face diapers that are mandatory in schools and transportation.
This decision is great but it is too narrow to solve the problem of all the mandates.
Where are the other challenges and where are the GOP leaders?
It’s the same here in the SF Bay Area, can’t do any of those things without a mask and proof of vaxx. Which means we just stay in. About the only time we mask up is to grocery shop.
You don’t have to mask up. Just don’t comply. That is the only way this nonsense will end. Forget the court rulings. Just do not comply.
The vast majority of businesses will only attempt to persuade you to comply. Be kind, friendly, show them a smile, and just keep walking to go about your business.
If a business wishes to enforce strictly, go to another business that fights for freedom. They may be discrete, but they exist everywhere.
Agreed Magnant. We have always approached the mask nonsense with a flair of ease and calm. Some ppl are genuinely afraid and it’s taken a long time for me to grasp/respect that. A smile goes a mile.
This is good advice. Even during the mask mandate signs on the doors of businesses here in central Va I did not comply. Only one time did the business ask me to mask up or leave. I simply acted as if I knew nothing smiled and walked on.
The sad thing here in major grocery stores in the suburbs 95 percent of the people are still masking up even though businesses are not mandating. They have been conditioned and cannot think for themselves-totally Skinnerian. No wonder so many communist elites went into psychology and psychiatry and ended up in our letter agencies.
Skinner’s book title says it all: he lusted to go “BEYOND FREEDOM AND DIGNITY.”
Agree. I didn’t wear a mask most of last year in New York City, and for the most part, wasn’t harassed.
…and in Los Angeles. ?
NYC and much of the state has been assimilated by the Dem Borg. You have to fallback to Red State controlled space.
Seneca, agree on the other mandates. Of interest, a federal court in Texas ruled this week that Gov. Abbott’s ban on schools mandating masks was illegal. I am sure that ruling will be appealed to this same 5th circuit. I hope/expect the same logic will be applied on that appeal. The 5th has historically been pretty good.
The courts are not the answer. Neither is the ballot box. We have to organize and defy and resist. Make local businesses feel the pain by not going there if they require it. The political class will not be brought to heel unless we as a people decide we no longer consent to their decrees. We aren’t at a Constitutional level anymore. We are at the Declaration of Independence level.
Absolutely, Wheens! I say, B L M. Boycott Liberal Madness!!!! Say it loud and say it proud!
!!!!>>>> WHEENS GETS IT, 110% <<<<!!!!
It’s done because the population complies. Just revoke consent.
If your local environment wants to consent or refuses to revoke, move to a locale that shares your values. That is the nature of a federalist government.
Birds of a feather flock together. Your grandma and ma understood.
So, maybe it is time to decide to leave New York and go South. There are not many restrictions and hardly any COVI19 down here. There are a few cases of COVID19-Delta variant because we don’t tell people they can’t get vaccinated around here.
At the least, if this decision holds up as it should, the organizations mandating vaxxes will have no cover for their actions. Their evil will be all their own.
“I haven’t seen one word said about this anywhere else in the media.”
They don’t write their own stories. They receive stories from the government( or the government’s minders) which they then all regurgitate. Clearly the gov’t doesn’t have its response ready–yet!
Enjoy the victory but have no illusions that we’ve heard the last of this.
Media Matters writes and distributes a lot of them. It was created by Bill Clinton still hurting from Monicagate, with financing by George Soros and given to David Brock. Lots of Soros monies continue to flow through Brock as part of the Soros money laundering syndicate of mostly non-profits.
Media Mutters: bastidges.
4 am headline comms.
Fully agree! Our family is going to be very choosy with how we spend our $ this Christmas.
Would be great to have a list of businesses we can support – just in time for the holidays!
I’ll start:
1) In-N-Out Burger
In other words, the court ruled that OSHA has jurisdiction on covid matters in a workplace that produces the virus, not where the virus can find its way in through the door. I don’t see how a higher court can ignore that. But then again, SCOTUS surprises us all the time.
Exactly! Covid-19 had nothing close to even a minor impact on Americans between the ages of 18 and 65 which is generally the age of the workforce so I don’t know how OSHA can justify an emergency order of this magnitude! I like the way the Appellate Court spoonfed their legal analysis so the Supreme Court, especially Kavanagh and ACB, wouldn’t F it up!”
Roberts is thinking of how he can call the mandate a tax
When Roberts blinks, his third eyelid shows… just sayin’.
I doubt the SC will even consider this case. They’re cowards. They’ve already ruled that the CDC doesn’t have the power to influence contract law. They may allow the permanent injunction (which is likely coming next) and tell Congress to enact a law if they want this done (like they did w/ the CDC).
Correct. The workplace did not create the “hazard” (e.g. unguarded rotating equipment, solvent vapors from a degreasing operation, etc. ) therefore OSHA has no authority to regulate/mitigate it.
Unfortunately, They don’t care about the authority.
They only care about the Power.
Beware the courts.
I’m about a third through reading the Circuit Court’s opinion, and I’ve already noticed something: the opinion capitalizes the term “Mandate.”
In so doing, the court is laying the groundwork for legitimizing whatever decision is made by any other court about this current power grab.
This is a Marbury v Madison tier power grab.
In other words, the Supreme Court is going to rubber stamp however the wind blows, and call it good.
Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that courts “interpret” the law. Don’t take my word for it; read the Constitution. Federal courts are authorized to decide cases and controversies. That’s it.
That would answer my question posed earlier re: whether the Constitution still survives. If the Judiciary failed to uphold lawful elections, what would prevent them from subverting the Constitution re: 1st and 4th-Amendment?
Nothing at all. $ talks, and the Big $ is not coming from us…it’s coming from Big Pharma & Big Tech.
The only constitutional republic you have left then is a Banana Republic, might as well do away with all the pretense in that case.
Well Brad what are your credentials to render this opinion?
credentials for an opinion?
Er, ability to read? The Constitution is not just for lawyers. Anyone who can’t read and understand our Founding Documents cannot consider themselves educated.
Well stated, Sir!
Scott, it is YOUR job to determine if what Brad says is true. He has a right to say it and you have a right to question it. But if you want to determine if it is true look into it instead of asking for “credentials” as if a degree from one university over another becomes a part of his so called “credentials” and whether they are valid if they don’t have the proper pedigree. If not from an Ivy League institution, I am confident you will deem his “credentials” insufficient for him posting an opinion about the matter.
FYI, your commie leftism is showing. It’s always evident. The goal of communism is to make people dumber by denouncing smart people who ask real and legitimate questions. The denouncer is always dumber than those he hopes to discredit.
Important point is OSHA cannot make LAW, it can make rules.
The only bodies that can make law are state Legislatures and Congress.
Joe biden cannot make laws, just executive instructions to OSHA.
Still OSHA cannot make Law.
For OSHA to make rules, it needs to go through a process, that takes many years (can take up to 10 years!)
For OSHA to bypass the regular process, they have a provision that it needs to be “necessary” and “grave”
The burden of proof is on OSHA and they have not made sufficiently clear that it is “necessary” and/or “grave”
They have proven neither, so good luck to OSHA in the next 10 years trying to come up with a valid legitimate rule that they have authority on
You know, they could bypass all of this if The Jab actually worked. Wow, what a concept.
Nope! Still not okay with the government forcing something into my body against my will. Think of the endless possibilities for a tyrannical government forcing “good for us” shots on us. Just NO!
Jimmy Liberty did not say legalize it. He said bypass it. Pretty confident the point is a mandate would be unnecessary if the jab worked safely and we had a real threat to our health.
The vast majority of working people have almost zero risk of adverse viral outcomes. Adverse outcome risk of the jab is several orders of magnitude higher from the gene therapy jabs.
FYI, the jab’s spike protein is jagged and scrapes the inner walls of blood vessels. Each jab creates billions of proteins. So for weeks after each jab, invisible damage is being done.
Sad that we have to become very knowledgeable and circumvent censorship to discover these risks, to say nothing of the evil forcing it on adults and kids.
End game will be Darwin Theory: those unthinking and intimidated folks that have had 3+ jabs will die much younger because their immune system was purposefully damaged. And kids of those people will have much greater health issues than had they escaped the tyranny.
All three branches make laws: Legislatures make them via Acts or Statutes; Courts make them via interpretive opinions; and Executive Branches make them via implementing regs, generally. All have full force and effect of law. If one violates an Act, Reg, or Ct. Opinion, one can be said to have “broken the law”, to use common parlance.
Beautiful tapestry of checks and balances, containing inter and intra-Branch cooperative and conflicting aspects, designed by the Anglo Saxons. I have a hunch it worked a bit better for the Anglo Saxons than it tends to work in contemporary America, and that it was a bit better suited for forebears of greater moral and intellectual fiber, sorry to say. It still works, however, and needs a society a bit more appreciative of the advantages of lawfulness, for the respect for law and order creates more order. Witness what widespread disrespect and corruption has wrought among us over the last few years.
In many cases, by the time the ‘rule is promulgated’ the rule is osbolete. Same with the EPA , FAA, DOT….cuz Industry is swifter, smarter and more agile than .gov at solving or eliminating risk.
And it is also sketchy to me that the Post Office, the White House employs and all of Congress (and their staff) are EXCLUDED from any vacccine mandates.
Take this “Stay” as a win ! Unless of course, you want to nitpick it into a loss of some kind. Sheesh.
The supreme court decided that TEXAS plus OTHER STATES had NO STANDING in a PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION FRAUD case.
I don’t know why anybody has the slightest desire to talk about the courts after that. Liberty will not be granted via court order.
The case is in the 5th circuit where it will die.
Horrendous cowardice by the SC and the lower courts. This showed beyond the “shadow a reasonable doubt” that the judicial system cannot be relied upon to save the country.
Texas should have passed a resolution that a state of war existed between Texas and PA. Maybe then the worthless cud-chewers on the Supremes would have woken from their bovine stupor.
Freedom is a natural right, my friends, because we’re made in the image and likeness of God. Period. We should never have let them define it in any other way.
“Liberty” was an ancient god that eventually became a political concept which, when applied as the basis of social interaction, seems to lead to degeneration and chaos. (Individuals doing whatever they want, no morality “imposed”.)
Law in such a world, separated from God (divinely sourced and transcendent) and based on political polling, is too often just the plaything of the powerful. Such “Law” can be argued but ultimately it is politically decided. We’re all too familiar with that.
Liberty is similarly manipulated out of historical context and common sense, as we see every day.
Bottom line: Freedom must be clearly defined and always and ever non-negotiable, and it must seized, as history so amply demonstrates.
Such is our world.
N.B. When I say “seized”, I in no way advocate or condone violence. (Just sayin’ because the bad guys keep their Sauron’s Eye on everything we say.)
Violence was necessary to establish the country that’s now been taken over by communists. Violence will be necessary to remove the communists and reestablish the country.
That’s a very interesting point you have made.
A state of war has also existed between Texas and the WEF.
Correct. Do not comply.
I doubt the SC will even take this case. Alito will let this die, and rightfully so, in the 5th circuit.
For the reason that the opinion says all that needs to be said. The SC can add nothing. Andrea Widberg at American Thinker has an essay this morning about the clarity of the ruling.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/11/the_5th_circuits_brilliant_opinion_staying_oshas_vaccine_mandate.html
Thank you for sharing.
This is excellent!
Agreed, this ruling seems pretty solid and if the SC is feeling cowardly again they can simply refuse to take it, and the injunction will stand.
It seems Sundance was effectively right in his initial statement (that it was a fake), then the WH found they had to actually get off their a$$ and find a work around – through OSHA
Unlike the brilliant work arounds that enabled PDJT to build the wall, for example, this was always a BS, cobbled together crap-fest, which this ruling has most adequately exposed.
Bravo.
If another Circuit Court of Appeals decides differently than the 5th, the Supreme Court will pretty much have to hear the matter.
How that will play out is going to be interesting. We have 3 liberal judges, 3 constitutional judges and the 3 Robturds swing judges.
JAIL for JUDGES.
Yes sir, but not the 5th circuit. Not this time.
1-800-JAIL-4JUGES
Donate your judge today
“The unvaxxinated have no standing and vaccinations are a tax that must be paid. Next!”
Here’s the difference between the authoritarian-left (Dem) and controlled opposition (Rep) — the left will ignore this. The mandate will continue.
Laws no longer matter. Accept that and the solution is obvious.
Absolutely true….if you allow it. “That which you tolerate, you get more of”. It’s really that simple and THIS is the hill to die on in defense of the Republic. A passive, accepting approach to this matter ends the already damaged Republic. Accepting anything the left advances at this point is the weakness they have sought for decades. The mandate, coupled with AG Garlands tyrannical threat of parents are the only two points on the spectrum needed to wake people up to the new reality the progressive commies hope to enforce upon our citizens. I’m done tolerating my once friendly neighbors that push to shame neighbors into vax compliance, support CRT and support FJB. Going along to get along ain’t cuttin’….
Print out a copy of the ruling and present it to your employer if they persist in demanding vax or test. The ruling cited federal law and precedent that will stand up in court. These judges and their staff did the work that makes it easier for other lawsuit to succeed against the federal government and any business.
Won’t matter. Corporate America will do his bidding.
Then leave corporate behind.
It’s the other way around. Biden does what Global Corporate tells him to do.
Some will, but not all. When employees start to move, it will create a different dynamic.
Husband’s company announced vax regardless of the stay.
Then won’t give the details or exemption forms until right before thanksgiving practically guaranteeing no time to get into the dr before the deadline.
Takes 6 weeks to be “clot shot” and 3 weeks after 2nd shot to be FULLY vaxxed.
My work did the same thing. Fortunately for me I got a medical exemption or I’d been fired on Dec 8th.
You work for EVIL people who want to KILL YOU.
I’m sure they appreciate that you’re willing to stick around until they find a way to stick you.
“….I’d been fired on Dec 8th.”
I’m glad to hear of your exemption; but, I must disagree with your conclusion about being fired on December 8th.
Your company is, on the basis of OSHA rules, (1) clearly trying to intimidate you into doing something you believe is not in your best interest and (2) which the 5th circuit is saying may be unconstitutional.
That’s should make your company lawyers squirm a bit and think about employee legal recourse, should your company be found to have fired you on grounds determined by the courts to be unconstitutional.
P.S. I’m not a lawyer. Thank God!
May not be OSHA. There are several mandates that are in play. The court ruling was about the OSHA one for all private employers with over 100 employees. The mandates for healthcare workers, government employees, government contractors and interstate transportation plus maybe others are still in play. The OSHA mandate was to get private employers to do what government employers and contractors were already doing.
There is language in this ruling that may be useful for the other groups affected.
The ruling cited the rule for blood borne pathogens. For medical offices this means we take universal precautions and do not mandate all employees get vaccinated against or routinely tested for things like HIV, Hep B or C, etc. We wear masks, gloves, dispose of needles properly, treat exposed workers promptly after exposure.
Ha….don’t get too comfortable…let’s see how long that exemption works…
Get a lawyer to fill out the exemption forms for you.
Your husband’s company is opening themselves up to lawsuits galore if they start laying people off. Read the ruling. It specifically mentions irreparable harm to the people affected by this. Any company that moves forward with enforcing a rule that was clearly stopped by the court is asking for lawsuits, and they’re probably going to get them.
Your life is worth more than your job. Don’t fret for two months like I did, make the decision right now that your life is worth more. Live happy and well. Don’t give them any satisfaction. Work diligently until they hand you the exemption form (last day I’m sure… that’s how it played out for me) and if they don’t hand you an exemption you write your own religious and/or personal beliefs exemptions and hand it over to them on that last day.
I know three people (one nurse and two students) who filed religious exemptions. Deadlines have long passed and they are still attending work and school.
The students exemptions were finally accepted, after a game of ‘who will blink first,’ replete with denials and harassing phone calls. And a judge stepped in, on a related case, which gave the nurse her reprieve.
If people stick to their guns they will legally prevail. Please stop being wussies and caving in to pressure.
NO job is worth your life.
And businesses requiring injections should be BLACKLISTED and BOYCOTTED.
A *unified* effort on our part would turn this bs around very quickly.
The Appeals court Stay is well worth reading. “The mandate would give Congress power to compel citizens to act as the GOVERNMENT WOULD HAVE THEM ACT.”
That is a police power. “The Federal Government has no such power.”
So when Captain Murder (biden) recently spoke about the government wanting the US citizens to get to a point where the Government can then let them have some breathing room and a semblance of normalcy—-that principle is clearly spoken about in this Stay by the Appeals Court!
It’s a great gettin’ up morning everybody!! Thanks to the Appeals Court, our US Constitution and TO CTH for this good news.
Great observations! Thanks!
(And what would we do without CTH?)
Yeah, like a lawless coup will follow any legal ruling!
I read that “Only appeal now is thru Justice Alito to SCOTUS.” https://creativedestructionmedia.com/news/politics
Will a legal Treeper please explain this statement, if true, and the next step here.
This old brain seems to remember that each Justice has jurisdiction over certain Appeals Courts.
Justice Alito would decide whether to advance this to the SCOTUS. If he doesn’t, that’s it.
So there WILL BE no “next step”. This stands.
And all private employees now have the whip hand if their employer fires them.
Would the government have an avenue for petitioning an en banc hearing by the fifth circuit? The three judge panel issuing the permanent injunction is all generally conservative judges while en banc would be a more mixed composition of the entire 5th.
For now anyway, the injunction is in force. If history is a guide, should SCOTUS choose to hear the case, I’d expect it to be next year after the holidays.
Praise the Lord!
Amen!
Since the Judge is not deciding the Constitutionality of the mandate itself, did he just give the administration a road way to rewriting the mandate in greater detail to apply more widely (inclusive of under 100 employee businesses) using the underinclusive and overinclusive definitions? Just being Devil’s advocate in asking the question.
All OSHA action is stayed until full judicial review is completed.
It is interesting, though, as to what WOKE corporate interests with government contracts may inflict on their employees and if employees have any recourse.
Yes sir. So, two points. 1) I clearly agree with the court opinion, there is NOTHING to suggest OSHA has such authority. In fact, we all know it is an absurd overreach. And, to your point, I’m not sure how every court in the land does not rule in favor of employees because, again and CLEARLY, the corporations began these actions AFTER the installed President declared his mandate and implored corporations to do it. If that isn’t evidence of corporations acting as an extension of government inn order to violate the Constitutional rights of citizens, someone tell me what is! But, that’s life in communist Ameristan.
Now if only the courts would strike down the Executive Order on federal contractors in the Executive Branch that mandate the vax.
It would save my job! And tens of thousands of others.
Anybody know the status of the Legal Council’s lawsuit on that?
Let’s don’t forget our captive military. What for them?
Where the hell are their lawyers?
Correction–it’s the Liberty Council, not Legal Council.
lc.org
Federal contractors are private employers.
So the ruling clashes with the BS EO mandate.
Who wins in court? The LAW or the EO?
Pretty much how, months ago, my company told us it would play out. I say that again to continue the point that all these big companies knew this and all of them who enforced vaccine mandates “because we are forced to” were lying.
They WANTED to. The OSHA Fairy Tale was to give them cover.
Abso-freaking-lutely! Same whoreshit happened with our rural school board and governor Wolfe’s mask mandate. Was mask-optional at the start of the year, then BAM! “Sorry, nothing we can do about it”. Cost those closet Marxists all 4 board seats that were up this year. One of them to a write-in. None of them even remotely close.
What’s amazing to me is historically corporations fight government regulation tooth and nail through politics and the courts but here they appear to be rolling over with out a fight and destroying customer and employee relations at the same time, going against the primary profit focus of business. Why?
Leftists have been installed on corporate boards and they have brought in leftist ceos.
Name we one Federal agency that hasn’t been politicized? OSHA obviously was following orders from the JoeBama administration.
“Circuit Court Judge Kurt Engelhardt wrote for the panel.”
I like his way with a pen.
He’s a hero. He and his colleagues acted quickly and decisively. The country needs more like him.
If the American people would just stand the Fxxx up and refuse to comply, the mandate would be pointless, there would be chaos and suffering in the short term through loss of jobs, income, lifestyle changes….but eventually the powers that be, through necessity, would acquiesce. Otherwise the national economy would grind to a halt. Remember the Founders? In 1776 they pledged: “We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.” With Hamilton adding: “Yes, we must indeed all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately.”
Are we so enamored with our comforts that we are prepared to give up our freedoms to maintain them?
I am not, I will not comply no matter the cost.
I made the decision long ago and any American can view the totality of what you referred to inscribed permanently within the Jefferson Memorial. Our founding fathers gave the full measure of devotion to their convictions. Plenty of us are ready. God’s will be done…
“Workaround” meets law.
Law wins.
What about the more strict federal contractor mandate even wfh have to get vaccines no testing option either.
Just say NO, I will not comply! It is an obvious infringement on our freedoms, regardless of what the compromised Justice System states. It will not stand unless we allow it to stand.
Yep. Let your companies push back or let them suffer the consequences.
I had to read the whole ruling and it is definitely worth the time. These judges were not only making a ruling, but they make comments that show they are highly irritated. “Nor can the Article II executive breathe new power into OSHA’s authority—no matter how thin patience wears.” Later on, the court admonishes the Biden administration for their rent moratorium as well “But health agencies do not make housing policy, and occupational safety administrations do not make health policy.”
Looks like the Hussein Regime just got their attempt at imposing Sharia Law was thwarted.
IIRC, the Brandon administration moved back the EO deadline for federal employees and gov contractors from November to January , to line up with the planned implementation of the OSHA “mandate”.
Now that the OSHA mandate is stayed, how will the EO mandate play out?
The gov knows it will lose thousands of Executive Branch employees who refuse to be vaxed, and tens of thousands of gov contractors who serve in agencies in the Executive.
CBP, for example, in a report leaked recently, has only 1/2 of their agents vaccinated as the November deadline approaches. I have seen no communication by DHS/CBP of moving that deadline to Jan 4, 2022.
You think the border situation is bad now? Wait until they lose half of their patrol agents. And the TSA isn’t much better at ~40% unvaxxed. Those airport lines will be very long.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/internal-report-more-half-border-patrol-agents-may-be-fired-being-unvaccinated
So what are they gonna do with us retired old farts who carry concealed legally taking prophylaxis Ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine and the appropriate vitamins who “REFUSE TO BE VACCINATED” ?
I saw all this coming back before OUR BELOVED President Trump was lawfully elected in 2016, bought me a place in the woods, greenhouse up and running, plenty of deer, turkey, feral hogs, …,etc. Even my children will be moving back to the new subsistence home if communism tries to force them & my grandchildren to “Take the vax” !
My republic IS a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC where freedom & righteousness rules. Gods BIBLE, his rule book prevails here. LETS GO BRANDON
Any properties for sale in your neck of the woods?
Feral hogs = SE USA. Never smart to announce the location of your redoubt on the internet.
“The mandate is a one-size-fits-all sledgehammer that makes hardly any attempt to account for differences in workplaces (and workers),” Circuit Court Judge Kurt Engelhardt wrote for the panel.
The problem isn’t that it’s one size fits all, blah blah blah. The problem is the second word in the sentence. Mandate.
I can make my own decisions, thank you Brandon.
“Researcher Blows the Whistle on Data Integrity Issues in Pfizer Vaccine Trials” ~ British Medical Journal, Nov 02, 2021
On Nov 05, 2021 the Texas “Expert” Vaccine Allocation Panel rubber stamped Pfizer death JABS for everyone over 5 years old, with NO debate on safety or efficacy
https://dshs.texas.gov/coronavirus/immunize/evap.aspx
Child-sacrifice is Old Hat to the Demoncrats. They’re the ones who are cheering for infanticide (see NY State Legislature when they passed the Born Alive Infanticide law).
So why would they blink at mandating the injection of spike proteins into babies? They inject potassium chloride into late-term infants’ hearts to kill them outright.
Now, the courts have to protect healthcare workers from Biden’s Medicare & Medicaid Vaccine mandate. These healthcare workers were heroes all during the pandemic until Biden decided they were a “threat”.
As if potential adverse reactions from normal doses weren’t enough, we have incompetent, amateur jabbers mass administering the vaccines. The FDA/CDC’s concern about dosage shows that they damned well know about the hazard of mRNA migration with their “safe” vaccines.
Loudon County Pharmacy Accidentally Vaxxed 112 Kids With Adult COVID Dose
12 Nov 2021
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/virginia-pharmacy-accidentally-vaxxes-kids-adult-covid-vaccine
More than 100 children in Loudoun County, Virginia, were given the wrong COVID-19 vaccine dosage. Parents of the children are furious about potential health complications.
Ted Pharmacy incorrectly administered Pfizer and BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine to 112 children between Nov. 3-4. The children, aged 5-11, were given doses meant for people over 12.
“On Nov. 5, state and federal authorities ordered the pharmacy to discontinue administering the vaccine, and Virginia Department of Health (VDH) subsequently collected all COVID-19 vaccines at the pharmacy.
Note all of the “Do not” warnings in this related to dosage:
COVID-19 Vaccine
Administration Errors and Deviations (CDC)
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/downloads/covid19-vaccine-errors-deviations.pdf
As a corollary, I wonder how long it’ll be until we see news stories about pharmacists (or whoever) fraudulently issuing millions of vaccine cards while wasting the shots in the trash.
You gotta figure a lot of them will not comply.
That sounds like a great ruse. But it will not hold up because, unbeknownst to the vaxxed, the Luciferase barcodes inside their bodies lights up like a Christmas tree under the scanners.
Where we’re going, we won’t need no stinking vaccine “cards.” The Globalists may have forgotten to disclose this little detail.
But no worries: Luciferase, aka the mark of the beast, is a ‘proprietary’ ingredient Big Harma is not required to disclose. (Aren’t you relieved?)
Other ‘proprietary’ ingredients in the mRNA vaccines appear to be: magnetic graphene oxide to computerize our cells for software updates(?), and living parasitic organisms called Hydra. God only knows what *they* are supposed to do!
One doctor who found these creatures under a microscope inside three different batches of J & J and Moderna vaccine, and realized that the creatures appeared to be aware of their surroundings, actually cried in despair.
I wonder how the courts would view favorable treatment of companies who “voluntarily adopt” (preferential treatment on contracts, favorable tax treatment, regulatory relief, etc).
That would remove the overt punitive sledgehammer appearance. Shift worker blame to employer vs government.
Not a fan of that approach, just anticipating the next move.
I wonder how long it’ll take savvy employers who won’t comply with osha to attract similarly savvy employees from their prior despotic employers.
Why is Gene Simmons attacking the unvaccinated?
When was the last time anyone listened to Gene Simmons?
Gene Simmons audience is dying from boredom, not COVID. Gene should “spruce” up his show instead of mailing it in…
Gene should give his show some “Pep”… some “Zing”…
He probably can’t help himself. At this point every cell in his body could be programmed by a Chinese bot for all we know. The Great mRNA Transhumanism experiment may have blurred the line between what is Gene and what is “Hal.”
Talk about knowing not what they do! But at least he gets to keep his job, so that’s good.. /s
Entrepreneur Who Just Flew To Space With William Shatner On Blue Origin Dies In Plane Crash
“De Vries is the co-founder of Medidata Solutions, a top-rated clinical research platform that has handled over 25,000 clinical trials involving seven million patients.”
YOU CAN’T DELIVER A LIFE-SAVING VACCINE IN LESS THAN A YEAR.
UNTIL YOU DO.
https://www.medidata.com/en/covid-19-moderna-vaccine
Got the Ron Brown treatment eh?
Is anybody keeping a list of all these Arkancides?
As an OSH professional, I observed that the work force has no idea OSH = DOL under Commerce and not the DHHS. I also know that every OSH rule for using a RESPIRATOR in workplaces entirely contradicts any ‘mask’ mandates.
Proof is : 29 CFR 1910.134 paragraphs (a) thru …(p?) for the why, where, who, when and how an employee may use, or be provided with, any respiratory device . Read the ‘voluntary use’ paragraph. And, read what is required for certification of a ‘respirator’ by MSHA, ANSI, and NFPA.. Then take some shots of ethanol…
“I also know that every OSH rule for using a RESPIRATOR in workplaces entirely contradicts any ‘mask’ mandates.”
If I understand you correctly, this may come in handy if the Biden’s re-work their mandate in such a way that the Court buys that it’s a mask mandate and not a vax mandate (I’m guessing that’s what the Supremes will say if they want to approve it.)
If so, it will be nice to be able to argue that OSHA’s mask mandate violates its respirator rules (not that the rules matter when it comes to modern American politics.)
Early on, someone postulated that challenging OSHA to differentiate exactly which masks are to be used in the workplace to prevent viral transmission, would collapse this whole mask thing. Absent hazmat suits, there is no such “safety equipment.”
Now we need two more court orders:
(1) Expressly affirming what 21USC says – that your body is yours, and that you may never be coerced.
(2) To STOP distribution of this very dangerous and ineffective substance under an EUA that was illegally granted. Other treatments DO exist. This illegal direct human trial must cease, and legal immunity should be revoked. Like the “emergency” OSHA provisions, EUA was never meant for this, and it’s prerequisites do not exist.
“Extraordinary power” is also granted to the FDA, and it, too, should be “delicately exercised.” Not to put literally millions of people now in sometimes-mortal danger where no actual “emergency”requires it, and where vastly safer alternatives do exist.
I must say that this article posted by VibeMan warrants reposting. If you’ve been a bit deflated by doom and gloom about how this won’t stand the dark of the left and their media then, as father would say, this is good for what ails you!
To quote VibeMan:
For the reason that the opinion says all that needs to be said. The SC can add nothing. Andrea Widberg at American Thinker has an essay this morning about the clarity of the ruling.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/11/the_5th_circuits_brilliant_opinion_staying_oshas_vaccine_mandate.html
In this case, Black Rock LLC is one of the good guys suing OSHA and Biden.
Black Rock? Good guys? That has not been my perception up to now.
Some CTH posters have fingered Black Rock as bad guys. Or am I getting that wrong?
Their website indicates they are big climate change advocates. Can climate change advocates oppose vaccine mandates?
Just a minor not your Black Rock as bad guys for reference..it is more than Black Rock.
The top 3 Invest Companies in the World:
Charles Schwab Corp.: $7.5 Trillion Assets under Management (AUM)
Black Rock: $7.3 Trillion AUM
Van Guard: $6.9 Trillion AUM
The next in line is Fidelity with $3.9 Trillion AUM
Size of US economy: about $23 Trillion, about 20% of the worlds GDP.
If you count for overlap in investments, these 3 companies essentially control (MANAGE for their OWNERS) nearly 20% of the worlds GDP producing assets. If the assets for the others in the top 10 of management companies are added together…the number is really eye opening after allowing for about 20-30% overlap.
This suit still avoids the medical-science, statistics and points of Federal Law covering drug mandates.
In fact it is down right dangerously worded as SUPPORTING MANDATES if the mandate is more correctly worded and applied. This leaves the door wide open for Justice Roberts to use his infamous Obamacare line to the lawyers for the, “Government and Employers, its a tax stupid”, never mind its not backed by science nor properly legislated.
I have no praise for any of the robed crooks.
How many people have been forced already to take the shot, or lose their job and leave their families homeless? How many your Honors?
A 3rd branch of our government dithers away while 2 other branches trample everyone’s God given rights.
This ruling should have been issued the day Osha tried this end run around our God given rights.
Instead the 3rd branch sits back and allows people to be trampled by a rogue government.
If the 5th circuit thought is was of grave concern then it should have been blocked by the court when it was issued.
Nope they sit back and wait for it to wind it’s way thru a government maze of horror.
Finally when they get around to it, they have grave concerns
The OSHA ruling had to be challenged before any court could act.
Not trying to be smart or condescending, but who made the rule? The court did. What law says they can’t pick up a copy of the OSHA rule day it was published and read it, then issue a ruling it is wrong.
What I am getting at is they dither when they should be ruling it unconstitutional the day it was published.
In short, the 5th circuit just said “FJB”! ?
Court rulings or no i will never take the jab just on the principal of the matter
I highly recommend reading the entire ruling. Pay attention to the footnotes. It’s entertaining.
Can’t WAIT to sue GAF for forcing my wife to choose the jab or her job….
Can you say MILLIONS?
WE ARE GOING TO BURY YOU CORPORATIONS!
I can’t think of a better way to collapse the world economy for a new world order, can you?
List of association footballers who died while playing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_association_footballers_who_died_while_playing
2000 – 7
2001 – 3
2002 – 5
2003 – 3
2004 – 4
2005 – 3
2006 – 6
2007 – 5
2008 – 4
2009 – 7
2010 – 9
2011 – 3
2012 – 8
2013 – 10 [worst flu season in a decade]
2014 – 5
2015 – 9
2016 – 8
2017 – 7
2018 – 4
2019 – 3
2020 – 3 [fewer games]
2021 – 14
I read an opinion earlier today that states. That the 9th Amendment is our protection against forced jabs. And should be used more often in our defense of Tyrannical government. Can anyone elaborate on this?
The 9th amendment states that powers not specifically given to the Federal Government are retained by the states.
As such, the Federal Government does not have the authority to mandate the notavax. This is why the Brandon admin could only apply it to the Federal workforce and contractors. Because they knew they do not have that authority and even that mandate is on weak legal footing.
The OSHA ETS rule is a blatant attempt to circumvent those limitations.
Also note: whether or not a state could mandate the notavax is dependent upon the state constitution, executive authority, and any emergency powers allowed by their respective agencies.
Thank you
The 9th amendment protects individuals rights that are not explicitly enumerated in the constitution. Self determination about what happens to ones own body is one of them. Apparently Roe vs Wade was argued on the basis of the 9th amendment. While I disagree that there is only one body involved in that decision, this represents a pillar of Liberal thought. We should use their own machinery against them. My body, my choice. I wonder if anybody has considered this route?
Sophomoric?
Probably.
FJB.
An ANGRY OUT OF CONTROL MADMAN! Joey, Go back to sniffing Hair…on Jackasses rear end!
If the election or courtroom isn’t rigged, Democrats don’t win.
“Touche”, Judges! (two of them were appointed by President Trump, the 3rd, by President Reagan)
They just handed Brandon his azz and ordered Mr. Biden to go find some more Patience, that he claims to be out of now.
That whooshing sound is Lame-Duck Preezy Brandon’s poll #s crashing. He’s out of moves now.
Not to worry. Cameltoe and Nanzi were last seen on Martha’s Vineyard in an arm wrestle. Help is on the way. /s
Question: The CMS rule (which makes vaccinated employees a caveat for Medicaid/Medicare compliance and decides if providers can continue to receive those funds for services rendered) overlaps with the now stayed 100+ employees stayed mandate. Hospitals have 100+ employees. The CMS compliance rule or a court ruling?
I’m wondering the same thing my wife’s work is funded by federal funds. Just want to know if this is a blanket stay or just certain sectors
Election Fraud put Joe Biden in the White House.
Joe Biden is not your Medical Doctor.
The experimental Covid vaccine will kill many people.