President Trump’s lawyers were allowed to view a preliminary draft of Jack Smith’s report from the documents case in Florida, under strict rules. After a review, the lawyers wrote to the DOJ demanding the political lawfare report not be released [PDF HERE].
Obviously, the report is a political hit job intended to target the transition process.
Because there are still two codefendants in the case, Judge Aileen Cannon has issued an injunction blocking the release of the report until after an appellate court can hear arguments.
FLORIDA – […] Cannon’s order, issued at the request of two Trump allies who were co-defendants in the classified documents case, bars the Justice Department from releasing the report or any portion of it until three days after a federal appeals court rules on the issue.
The order bars Garland, the Justice Department, Smith and “all of their officers, agents, and employees, and all persons acting in active concert or participation with such individuals” from “releasing, sharing, or transmitting the Final Report or any drafts of such Report outside the Department of Justice.”
Cannon’s order does not apply to Trump or his co-defendants, even though Smith contends they inappropriately revealed aspects of the report — which they have reviewed in recent days — in a Monday court filing. In that filing, Trump revealed Smith described him as “engaged in an unprecedented criminal effort,” as “the head of the criminal conspiracies” and said he harbored a “criminal design.” (read more)
Really easy decision here.
Cannon has ruled Smith unlawfully appointed.
Ergo EVERYTHING Smith did or wants to do is unlawful.
“Unlawfully Appointed”.
I wholeheartedly agree; says all anyone needs to know.
The fraud shouldn’t even get a reserved parking spot at the courthouse. He can pay to park out of his own greasy pocket .
Parking spot: gitmo
The election of Biden was illegal so that makes any appointee unlawful.
and all pardons illegitimate
Fraud vitiates everything! United States vs. Throckmorton. But unfortunately nothing will be done.
But: “Lawfare” never cared one whit about “the law.” Still doesn’t. The law is a weapon, and a cudgel at that.
So these crooked bunch of jack asses want to issue a report so they can portray the codefendants as guilty before they have a trial??
Jack Smith needs to be prosecuted for Misconduct, starting 1pm Jan 20th. Immediately revoke his passport and do not allow him out of the country.
Have him followed everywhere he goes, so he can not try to sneak into a foreign embassy to hide.
It’s like the Gaetz “ethics” report. It will likely be leaked simply to smear regardless of what the facts are.
I dare them to test Judge Cannon. She doesn’t care who they think they are, and I bet she would want a glossy 8×10 of their mugshot to go on her wall.
I don’t think they have the balls to test Judge Cannon
🎯
A douchebag’s douchebag, quite an unremarkable fella..
The accusation is the punishment.
“So these crooked bunch of jack asses want to issue a report so they can portray the codefendants as guilty before they have a trial??”
It’s enough for the Democrats’ WOKE base. Just make an allegation against someone they hate, and they start a lynch party right away.
Nope, send in a SWAT team to his house at 1 AM with CNN reporters in tow. Perp walk him outside in his underwear and throw him into the DC jail Solitary unit. Let him rot there for the remainder of the Trump 47 administration.
excellent!
Hell… for starters just withdrawal his SECURITY clearance! Trump needs to do that ONE SIMPLE ACTION to all the people that do not work for the government including all the people that signed the letter saying that the laptop was “Russian disinformation”!
I would think at a minimum he should be disbarred
Smith and Garland will receive preemptive pardons
The ( criminal design ) comment
on the content of the sm it report,
sounds like someone ( sm it )
is sm itten
in that smit ( and sin ister company ) is miss accusing someone else,
of what sm it ( and sin. co. ) is ( and has been )
doing for years.
Not good for the goal of
( honest, unbiased)
equal justice for all.
[ hello bar board and
acadeMIA?
Is anyone present, accountable and responsible ? ]
hmmm…
I do not know
People know…
Seeking the whole truth…
p.s.
Connor is good at gradually exposing more and more of the inequality silliness,
on a legal level.
It’s like. building a case to counter the sin ister sm it and sin co. – if someone, a defendent, chooses to legally counter, sm it and sin co at some time in future.
( building a lesson for acade MIA to study and scratch their heads… maybe to seek a phd ?
( but, do nothing productive in their life journey)?)
Imho
Better get lawyered up and/or pardoned!
Much like the NYC judge trying to get sentencing in before Trump takes office so the Dem’s can’t spout felon…They’ve learned nothing from the election.
Intentional stupidity.
THIS IS WHY A INFERIOR ATTORNEY (NOT CONFIRMED BY THE SENATE) CANNOT BE TRUSTED OR EVEN ELIGIBLE TO BRING CHARGES TOWARDS A PRESIDENT OR ANY SUPERIOR OFFICER OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
for one, it’s not permitted under the constitutional.
for two, the purpose of the Senate confirmed process is to weed out and Vette attorneys who are unlikely to answer even basically questions about law and the constitution and also to examine their records and question them about actions they have taken and the reasons why.
Clearly Jack Smith was not only not given the authority to conduct any investigation but it raises the root problem: he was given power by the AGDOJ unlawfully. Skipping a US Attorney Senate confirmation was intentional because he would have failed across the board to gain such powers. He prior record proves him unqualified to investigate and bring charges and prosecute a case against a President.
Judge Cannon was correct.
the Meese Brief is spot on with legal reasons that help inform Judge Cannon to dismiss.
what remains?
In my opinion this selection by AG DOJ was intentional. it is misconduct. I blame the blathering idiot corrupt Garland for this failure to recognize good order and to refuse to follow plain constitutional requirements.
this isn’t just a mistake…garland should be charged with color of law penalties
at a minimum a penalty that will remove his law license. And also that of Jack Smith…
at a MINIMUM
God Bless America
Is it Congress’ or Pam Bondi’s job to prosecute these offenders and to prevent these sorts of antics from occurring again?
We know Congress would’t do anything that forceful.
If it’s the AG’s job, does Bondi have the conviction, command and gravitas to accomplish this?
Does she take it to the Supreme Court?
Ultimately it must be Bondi. Congress cannot bring charges themselves, they can only recommend the AG bring charges.
Tom Fitton (Judicial Watch) on this morning’s War Room suggested a special prosecutor be appointed out of the White House. I did hear the legal justification for it but I can’t explain it myself.
The practical justification is that the corruption is so deep and widespread at DOJ that any effort to go after these guys would be stalled for the entire term of the administration; same with the FBI. Bondi and Patel will have their hands full (I am writing as if Bondi will be a strong good faith actor, not taking into account what SD has highlighted about her past).
Congress does not prosecute anyone. They write the laws. The President enforces them, so the President needs agents to do this on his behalf. The Attorney General and all DOJ employees work for the President. Democrats know that when they have the White House, but like to talk about an “Independent DOJ and AG when a Republican is in the White House.
I do not know….it would appear that the watchers will watch the watchers.
if history repeats.
first a internal, from the inspector (Horowitz)…then appointment/selection of special counsel to see if there are any probable cause to establish grand jury and move to indictments.
that’s DOJ stuff
separately there is a civil possibility..maybe..I dunno about this one. In my view President Trump and other defendants have an argument this was color of law crime…criminal…making the case even if possible to file would likely go to DC courts for trials.
and this is the problem center to both possibiliies…it’s the DC court judges who will unlikely allow DOJ people to be convicted, even and especially if this means it exposes institutional corruption.
there is a reason why Joe malarkey can clean record of seating the most federal judges and prosecutors of any president (squatter) in history..his handlers wasted no time packing the courts. My understanding is that Joe malarkey has been on the march to seat corrupt judges from the moment he was seated as senator, about 12,000 years ago..so use perspective when qualifying “record number”…but no doubt he had a hand in making sure very dubious hand picked stooges were appointed and seated and especially the DC embecile.
God Bless America
“I blame the blathering idiot corrupt Garland for this failure”
…but his grandparents told Merrick he was the smartest boy in the world!
Working for the Clinton administration as Asst. Deputy Attorney General,
Garland supervised several high-profile domestic terrorism cases, including the Oklahoma City bombing, and the Atlanta Olympics bombings.
Even then, questions abound as to whether an honest effort was used to separate guilty from innocent.
And there were mysterious happenings and federal law enforcement abuses in those cases.
Atlanta Olympics–The framing of Richard Jewell.
The Oklahoma City Bombing–The “loss” of all surveillance camera evidence for the case, including video that would show Timothy McVeigh didn’t show up with the Ryder truck all alone.
THe only thing that keeps McConnell from being a total waste of oxygen was his actions in keeping Garland off the SCOTUS.
Your posts are not to be missed and this is one of your best – Thanks for the clarity
Among the wrecks and fragments of exalted wisdom which have floated down the stream of time from venerable antiquity, and been picked up by those humble but industrious wits who ply along the shores of literature, we find a shrewd ordinance of Charondas the Locrian legislator. Anxious to preserve the judicial code of the state from the additions and amendments of country members and seekers of popularity, he ordained that, whoever proposed a new law should do it with a noose around his neck; whereby, in case his proposition were rejected, they just hung him up—and there the matter ended.
The effect was, that for more than two hundred years there was but one trifling alteration in the judicial code; and legal matters were so clear and simple that the whole race of lawyers starved to death for want of employment. The Locrians, too, being freed from all incitement to litigation, lived very lovingly together, and were so happy a people that they scarce make any figure in history.
– – Washinton Irving, (Diedrich Knickerbocker’s History of New-York)
Make America Look At This.
AGAIN.
👻
I just love the writing, as much or more than the notion presented, which sounds awfully appealing.
I have been wishing for a Constitutional Amendment that requires every single piece of legislation to include a sunset provision not to exceed 10 years, no exceptions. Congress would be required to review each act they pass… they might be too busy to add on new intrusions into our daily existence.
“In that filing, Trump revealed Smith described him as “engaged in an unprecedented criminal effort,” as “the head of the criminal conspiracies” and said he harbored a “criminal design.“ Sorry for stating the obvious here but that’s some of the dumbest garbage I’ve ever read. Outside of the View I’m not clear anyone would actually swallow this.Smith ought to be in jail, bunking with a guy named Bubba who thinks he’s cute.
According to Jack Numnutz, Biden taking classified material over his 50 year reign of error was just inadvertent, but Trump cooperating with various feral agencies after leaving the White House culminating in an FBI raid is a conspiracy.
A conspiracy to do what, I don’t know.
Didn’t the GAO packup all of President Trump’s documents into boxes and dump them on the street in front of the White House???
I remember the picture of that. I believe that that was as he was leaving office in 2021 and the street was actually the little bit of driveway on one side of the WH, but wasn’t out in the street per se. It was pretty damned unceremonious , though.
Exactly, the GAO dumps the boxes with classified documents on the front lawn of the White House and then tells the DOJ … President Trump has classified documents!
No, this is much more stupid than that. Here is what actually happened. The left claims Trump stole the documents from the White House in order to sell them or give to Putin. They forget how the whole thing started. The Archives demanded documents from Trump, and Trump had 15 boxes sent without checking the contents first. TRUMP HAD NO IDEA WHAT WAS IN THOSE BOXES. The assumption was only the kind of documents the Archives would want. In reality, there was a little everything in those boxes including magazines, books, newspapers and newspaper clippings, articles of clothing, and various souvenirs. Jay Bratt, the original US Attorney from the DOJ’s National Security Division called the contents of the boxed “debris.” Mixed into the debris in 14 of the 15 boxes were documents with classified markings on them. As far as we know, this how they found out, and how Trump found out, documents with classification markings were packed at the White House by General Services Administration, or one of GSA’s contractors. This was “inadvertent packing” as Joe Biden claimed was how he wound up with a library of such documents from his days as Senator and Vice President. That was likely not the reason for Biden having such documents, but it is plausibly how Trump was stuck with them since this was his first rodeo in packing to leave service in D.C. when Biden had to do it numerous times.
There was legal exposure here for Trump as he did not know the documents were in those 14 of the 15 boxes. The possession was unintentional, and Bratt originally treated it that way. He actually told the media that Trump did NOT have those documents to sell them, but thought he should keep other documents the Archives wanted that were not marked classified, because he thought he should be able to keep them. Many thought the case was over once Bratt said that. While Trump did not know of the presence of those documents, it could be argued that he SHOULD have known either by proper supervision at the White House, or checking the boxes after they were delivered, followed by informing federal authorities that marked documents had been packed for delivery to Mar-a-Lago by accident and arranging for them to come pick them up. Since he did not do those things, he could be prosecuted for GROSS NEGLIGENCE WITH CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS under paragraph (f) of the Espionage Act.
Attached is a case in the jurisdiction of the Judge Advocate General in the military for gross negligence that included hurried packing to leave for a new assignment at another base. The accused service member was found guilty of the charge of gross negligence, but civilian courts do not always render guilty verdicts for gross negligence without some degree of intent and damage to the United States being supported by evidence.
https://scmoorelaw.com/military-appellate-courts-address-gross-negligence-in-the-handling-of-classified-materials-in-the-1995-case-of-united-states-v-roller/
This article explains the civilian courts’ approach to gross negligence under the Espionage Act:
https://warontherocks.com/2016/07/why-intent-not-gross-negligence-is-the-standard-in-clinton-case/
What the above article does not explain is why Comey and the US Attorney responsible for this prosecution did not use this statute: 18 USC 1924. Sometimes, when a prosecutor does not want a conviction the correct statute for the case in court is NOT chosen. The media overwhelmingly assumed the statute used for Hillary Clinton would be 18 USC 1924. There’s no wiggle room in that one about gross negligence. Bratt and Smith couldn’t use it on Trump because the President is not named as an official chargeable under 18 USC 1924, but Hillary could have been prosecuted under that statute.
Here is a link about the status of the 15 boxes sent to the Archives by Trump and why Jay Bratt identified “debris” in the boxes along with both classified and unclassified US documents in the 15 boxes:
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-mixed-classified-documents-with-personal-items-like-clothes-2022-9
This is evidence of real “inadvertent packing” or “hasty packing” by the GSA, and not intentional retention of the documents with the classification markings. If Trump was plotting to keep the documents and commit some crime with them, they would not have been in those boxes for the Archives to find them. This was how the case started.
So it was a setup by the GSA/contractor with an assist by the radical archivist to get Trump again.
Another issue is he declassified everything pertaining to Russiagate, in which BBarr never fully released the docs, thus retaining the so called classified heading.
However, my take is that if a President declares a doc unclassified and the DOJ never gets around to it, the President is immune from any prosecution under the Presidential Records Act.
The staged photographs that Jack Smith admitted were tampered evidence is another red herring. Oh the lies!
I think the Russiagate stuff was in the Trump’s office. Smith’s indictment reported where all the classified documents and the Count 11 document which had no classification markings, but was “National Defense” information. The grand subpoena did not request a search by Trump’s lawyers for “National Defense” documents with no markings. Therefore, I don’t think that count should be in the indictment, but there it is. In one of the several times Judge Cannon ruled in favor of Smith was when there was a motion to dismiss the case entirely, or just individual counts. I’ll have to look to see if 11 was one of them.
Exactly 27 documents were found in Trump’s office. 75 were found in the Storeroom where all the others were found. None were found on the ballroom stage or in that restroom that gets so much play.
Something was going on at the Archives since they refused a request to do pack-out for Trump. This piece here from “The Researcher” at X (Twitter) is interesting in how the Documents case was downplayed at first by the DOJ and the media, since Trump voluntarily sent the boxes with documents that put him in that legal spot. Most people didn’t think it would amount to anything. These are LAWFARE dudes talking. Weissmann says something interesting at about 5:12 on the video, namely Trump said he was going to run, so action was taken against him.
https://x.com/listen_2learn/status/1851063001664692242
There is another that I’ll post below just of Norm Eisen talking about how Trump “Lives on the Edge of the Law,” but never topples over it. I think Norm spent some time in the USA’s office in the Southern District of New York looking for Declinations of Prosecution with Trump as the subject.
https://x.com/listen_2learn/status/1851102208445776224
Guy-Your grasp of the facts in this case is impressive. I had forgotten a bit with the whirlwind of lawfare (by design), that has been happening.
To me, it was in those specific presidential docs that the DOJ/Comey McCabe and Strzok et al, were proven to be the blunt instruments (under Obama and Biden’s orders) who used Russiagate against Trump, while a sitting president. They then broke all protocol to go after a former president and used the archives and GSA to help construct a bogus indictment after he left office. (This model of indictments is used all over the world against many leaders.)
Also, the Nat’l Sec docs may have related to Ukraine regarding bio-labs, and corruption furnished by Giuliani and the Ukraine prosecutor. Trump found out about all kinds of CIA/MI6 and EU shenanigans happening in Ukraine, as well as Covid at the Wuhan lab. A virtual treasure trove of incendiary govt. secrets.
Those issues would send the whole cabal and some members of the IC/DoD into a tailspin, so I think all the above reasons are why the FBI raided MAL, even after they had inspected and approved locked storage rooms at MAL. It was so serious to the cabal that they invaded a former President’s home, staged pics, rifled through personal wardrobes and indicted two personnel who were close to Pres. Trump. They really jumped the shark when they appointed an illegitimate prosecutor (Smith) to avoid scrutiny by Congress.
As Eisen states, the indictment (and subsequent media hype) was triggered because Trump decided to run again and was now Biden’s political rival.
Also, they wanted to get Trump on docs because they had just discovered the Biden classified boxes in Delaware and Penn that contained years of docs that Biden stole. He was using the Trump indictment as a distraction from that and covering for all of those involved, especially Hunter. Biden would also have political leverage over Trump and election talking points about a convicted felon.
So they all conspired to break the law, but all they did was tighten the noose around their own necks.
Great and shocking information all around us.
Thanks for the stimulating chat 🙂
According to the smarmy David Ferriero, he was watching on TV as Trump left the White House carrying boxes, and wanting to “know what the hell is in those boxes”.
It was a setup from the start.
Edited to add the link:
https://www.unc.edu/discover/dont-mess-with-the-archivist/
Especially since the CCP government appears to have paid Biden more than the US government.
Smith is not only evil and stupid, he is lazy too. It sounds like he just re-packaged what he was planning to use as opening arguments at a trial. He didn’t even bother to re-phrase it as unproven allegations.
“Because there are still two codefendants in the case”
Pffft. They don’t care about the rights of any other defendants when there are political enemies to smear.
They persecuted over 1500 innocent Americans for J6 as a way to attack and smear Trump
Am I the only one who wonders whether Judge Cannon’s order will be defied and when the leaked version will appear?
Leak away, I bet Judge Cannon is waiting for them to pull a little cute trick like that.
I would be willing to bet she would jail Jack Smith and Jay Bratt until the leaker is identified.
I would not test that Judge if you are in the DOJ!
I’d like to think you’re right, and it would be glorious to see.
Yes, LEAK AWAY you anti-American B tards!
The sooner, the better. Ooh Ooh
The process is the punishment. Ooh Ooh
The sooner the process, the longer, harder, meaner the punishment. Ooh Ooh
The beatings will continue until MAGA improves. Ooh Ooh Yah!
MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA MAGA 24/7
You are not the only one who wonders and it has happened.
Today, DOJ/ Garland announced he would release the draft report.
https://gvwire.com/2025/01/08/justice-department-plans-partial-release-of-special-counsels-trump-report/
Dirty old grandma strikes again.
I hope Judge Canon throws the book at that traitorous piece of human detritus.
Has Las Vegas posted the odds yet on the date on which the entire report will be “leaked”, and/or whether it will be in the NY Times or the Washington Post?
Prosecutorial Misconduct charges for Smith, Weissman, etc. All a bunch of criminal turds.
I’m a biased Trump supporter but even if I shake off my biases as best as I can I consider Judge Cannon to be a great judge. Her decisions have merit and cogent arguments.
If only all Judges in the USA were like her rather than the Judge Merchan types in Blue jurisdictions.
Trump/MAGA, America 1st WINS AGAIN!
GAG ON THAT all of you anti-American, traitorous, 6 ways from Sunday CREEPERS!
Come On you all you Peaceful Protesting MSNBC Maddow Marxist FREAKS, LEAK some more LIES about President Trump !
Come on all you stink’in FAUX NEWS RINOS, VOMIT some more VIITRIOL! I double dog dare you to eat it up!
Surely Shifty Shit can take the floor and do the Skiffy Shuffle one more time for the HOUSE!
What’s the matter, KASH got your tongue?
I don’t know all of her own jurisprudence, but that lady should be on our SC someday.
she let smith continue his fraud, should have shut it down first day.
She let him go on long enough to hang himself.
timing was perfect – Judge Cannon is an American Hero of the highest degree. Schools should be named after her.
“she should have”
done what an impatient armchair wanted
rather than being an extremely ethical, courageous AND lawfare savvy judge?
😂 😂 😂
Thank God she, like PDJT, does NOT comply with such self indulgent demands.
They made Trump an icon with this crap, and they are too obtuse to realize and understand it..
When they are arrested and start screaming “I know my rights” they need to hear “you’ll get the same rights you gave Trump.”
They won’t get that either.
The dems will leak the damn thing anyway, thru their friends in the media.
If they haven’t already. They may have done so before it even crossed her desk.
yeah, it’s not like it’s a pending supreme-court decision or something … which no one would EVER EVER leak …
… right?
The dude oozes misery.
Smith needs to go back to his home in The Netherlands where dope is free and prostitution is legal, he looks strung out. He needs to do a little window-shopping.
Smith is a dope and a prostitute.
DOGE Smith and everyone associated with him. We paid how many millions for his destructive lawfare nonsense.
Irrelevant. If they don’t release it, they’ll leak it.
Smith is a private citizen not acting in any official capacity. The court ruled he was unlawfully appointed.
None of the allegations he is making have been proven or adjudicated by a court. They are only personal opinion.
This is not an official report it is a personal slander.
If Smith releases these documents, Trump should sue Smith personally for that slander.
The SC Presidential immunity ruling is extremely consequential and very timely.
It’s with good reason the uniparty globalists had a collective meltdown over it.
Will leak thru WP in days
The new Barman villain should look like this.
Smith really should leave the USA.
So jerk-off smith is suffering from multiple personality disorder & is the investigator, prosecutor, judge & jury all rolled into 1 unlawfully appointed basket case.
He can accuse, charge, convict & sentence in his fraudulent “report.”
Nice slap down by Judge Cannon. Perhaps the good judge can sentence the offensive, unlawfully appointed basket case to a straight jacket & a rubber room?
Why stink up an innocent room?
The “Smith Report” sounds like it is basically “Steele Dossier 2.0.”
Unsourced, unproven but sensational allegations released as a political hit-job against Trump by the sore-loser.
Very good, but not completely surprising as Judge Cannon has accumen and integity.
Friday is a problem however.
The Supremes will have to weigh in and fast.
Is it the end of the world if Trump is sentenced?
No.
But….
History will be written that he was the first and only convicted felon to enter the WH.
And that is a win for Lawfare.
So let us pray it does not happen,
If the sentence can get carried post 1/20. Trump can pardon himself = no conviction.
Good! judge Cannon is great. Jack Sprat was not legally appointed. We here know this.
Holy cats! These bad guys never stop.
Hurray President Trump and Judge Cannon!!
Smith looks like a dead man walking…
If the case was dismissed, then why is there a report at all? Is this a thing? Can prosecutors just write reports for the purpose of maligning a private citizen? I thought that when a case is dismissed, it’s over. Apparently the prosecutors can spend the next several months writing a report. This sounds absurd. And why haven’t the other cases been dismissed?
The hit job will be leaked. The Devil never sleeps.
will only matter to the lunatic fringe – screw em
I remember when Trump 45 accused a Federal judge of being an “Obama judge”
Chief Justice Roberts was pretty quick to state,”We don not have Obama judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges.
He went on to say,”What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them.”
You don’t say!
2 assassination attempts
4 criminal indictments
1 civil lawsuit
1 shoot to kill raid
falsifying evidence and information on Government documents to a Federal court
tampering and falsifying evidence in a Congressional hearing
a foreign invasion
Mass murders, crime and corruption of every kind throughout society
Fast forward 7 yrs. to Trump 47 and Justice Roberts is bitching about violence, intimidation, threats, disinformation and defiance of laws against the judiciary.
WOW! You don’t say? Gosh sure wish I could help you but I don’t know an extraordinary group of judges doing their level best to do equal right to those who appear before them. I just know Biden judges.
Jacky boy built his house on sand and the Trump wind came along and blew it away. Thanks Judge Cannon, We the People, President Trump’s legal council and last but not least, Almighty God!
Smith is so bad at what he does challenging his stuff is like shooting fish in a barrel. I finally found a statute that might have worked in his indictment about J6. All I had to do is put the right search terms in Google and there it was: 18 United States Code Section 1346–Scheme or Artifice to Defraud. At least it comes closer to his descriptions of what he accuses Trump of doing than an anti-terrorism statute like 18 USC 241, written against the PHYSICAL TERRORISM tactics of the Ku Klux Klan.
He’s incompetent, so the tactics he’s employing are all he has.
I hope and pray when this is all over and Trump is in office that his justice dept. puts this demon in jail! And, takes him to court and destroys him financially!
These criminals are simply traitors to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights! Let’s seeeee….. you have a reprobate that is ILLEGALLY appointed using the force of the US government to obtain warrants to try to get people to lie under oath and “flipping” them and THEN publish that data to try to ruin the PRESIDENT’S reputation?
Well, they will just have to ‘leak’ it.
It gets worse!
Jack, if that”s his real name;), and Merrick, the UNConstitutionally appointed thief parading as an SC and the weasel dog who illegally “appointed” him, are stealing MILLIONS in taxpayer dollars NOT approved by CONgress, are fighting to share their illegal and unlawful extremely one-sided and biased “report” to CONgress en camera, on a faux case that was ended by Judge Cannon months ago for all of the above reasons.
Nothing about any of this is legitimate or done according to the law. Kinda’ like the 2020 selections. All of them need to referred to the Bar to have their law licenses removed. The same goes for Matthew Graves and anyone who perpetuated the J6 lies, myths and persecutions.
I have to say, I will be forever grateful to Turtle for one thing and one thing only, no Merrick Garland on the Supremes. Thank You, Thank You, Thank You!
Garland intends to defy Judge Cannon and release at least a major portion of the report.
“But the Justice Department said Wednesday there was “neither any need nor legal basis for an injunction” on the release of the report because Garland intends to give Congress only volume one — which focuses on Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election — “in furtherance of the public interest in informing a co-equal branch and the public regarding this significant matter.”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/01/merrick-garland-fights-release-jack-smiths-final-report/
Garland will fearlessly take his last opportunity to smear PDJT.
I hope it includes the section where Trump ordered Milley and Chris Miller to call up 10k Nat Guard as a precaution.
So that is not a criminal intention to overthrow the govt. using unarmed peaceful protesters.
Mark Meadows was in the office and heard the President give the order.
Both military leaders disregarded his command.
That is why a lot of this lawfare has continued, courtesy of the DoD types trying to save their own necks for disobeying a lawful command. Liz Cheney perpetuated the insurrection lie, by withholding exculpatory testimony and tampering with witnesses.
It all ties together into a despicable knot of treachery, sedition and deceit.
Smith and Garland will release parts of the report then they will receive preemptive pardons