Appearing with Sebastian Gorka, Kash Patel puts some excellent context on the issue of Dircuit Court Judge Chutkan presiding over the special counsel case against President Trump. {Direct Rumble Link Here}
I was unaware of the detail where Judge Chutkan originally presided over the case when Fusion GPS tried to block Devin Nunes and Kash Patel from revealing the source of the payments for the Chriss Steele dossier. This is a big datapoint. WATCH:
.
TRANSCRIPT – Kash Patel: “Judge Chutkan, for those who don’t know, represented Burisma, Hunter Biden’s fraudulent consulting firm, she was a lawyer at the same law firm with Hunter Biden. But Seb, let’s put that aside. What other matters are there for her recusal? In 2017 when Devin Nunes and I were running the Russiagate investigation, we figured out who paid for the Steele dossier. Fusion GPS, the DNC, and the Hillary Clinton campaign paid Christopher Steele millions of dollars and they laundered it through the FBI and the FISA court to unlawfully surveil Donald Trump. That’s big-time stuff.
On the eve of us winning that disclosure, before the world knew, Fusion GPS took us to federal court and that case landed in JUDGE CHUTKAN’S COURT ROOM. … After a month of heavy litigation where Judge Chutkan knew the ins and outs of Fusion GPS, our proceedings, all possible witnesses, etc., when she could not prevent us from prevailing, she recused -on her own- from that case. Why?”
“We found out her law firm, Boies Schiller, represented Fusion GPS. The very client that was in front of her in federal court was one of her former clients. That is rule #1 for disqualification.”
GORKA: “Boies Schiller Flexner is the same company where Chutkan and Hunter Biden worked!”
PATEL: “You gotta ask yourself, Seb, how come it took Chutkan a month [to recuse herself]? … She wanted to block the bank records.
Imagine if we never found out who paid for the dossier. … She set the precedent. She cannot neutrally and arbitrarily preside over Donald Trump’s criminal trial when she recused herself from the very representation of the Democratic entrenchment: the DNC, the Hillary Clinton campaign, Fusion GPS, because she was so biased because of her prior representation from Boies Schiller.
How could she possibly be allowed to stay on this case? And it wasn’t us, Seb. We got her off because of her own history. That precedent is what Donald Trump’s lawyers must apply this week.”
Perhaps this recusal issue is why four other district court judges including Boasberg sat in the back of the courtroom for President Trump’s appearance last week. Perhaps the judges were proactively contemplating who would meet the DC recusal threshold.
This is insestious, Democrats
Holy crap! Having her on the bench is like getting railroaded into court on some bogus charge and then you find that the judge at your trial is your crazy ex-wife, and she refuses to recuse.
So what isn’t rigged by the Democrats these days?
Nothing shocks me any longer when it comes to Washington DC and the democrat politics!
We are a communist country. They got long knives. Obama garbage
The fact that Obama appointed her is a conflict of interest, all by itself. And the tougher sentences that she’s applied the all the Jan 6 cases shows her bias.
Conflicts abound. If she had a smidgeon of ethics and character she would recuse on her own without question.
Find out if she has a valid valid signed oath of office, if not, go for nullification of all the sentences she has placed on those J6 prisoners, look at Todd Callender’s work on oaths
The founders understood they were creating a country suitable only for people of character. First and foremost, it officers and officials would require character, even if it were lacking in the general public. This got us by for a very long time, but that time now is long past. Our government officers and officials are as common and mean (tending towards vile) as any street thug, they just have better clothes and higher-paying jobs.
“Perhaps the judges were proactively contemplating who would meet the DC recusal threshold.”
Forget recusal, this factoid suggests a change of venue is in order. It’s also necessary to assure the least possible bias in a jury.
Love you guys, great ideas! What a plus to see YOU expounding on this persecution of President Trump!