There is a new awakening amid the electorate; one that has been a long time coming, but it is finally here.  More Americans are aware of the UniParty than ever before.

FACT:  When both teams in the Super Bowl are owned by the same person, the Lombardi Trophy is destined to end up the same cabinet regardless of who wins.

There is only one party in Washington DC, the UniParty.  They are funded by the same ownership, Wall Street; and their legislative victories end up with the same benefactors.  The candidacy of Donald Trump represents a second party option for the first time in two decades.

As a consequence, when Bill Kristol advocates for a Ben Sasse or Mitt Romney candidacy, he is framing the fallacy of false choice.  Kristol can claim his framework is more than a Potemkin village attempt as a counter argument, but the truth is evident in reality.
Here’s proof, empirical evidence, of the UniParty construct.

There is absolutely no difference in legislative outcomes with Nancy Pelosi/Harry Reid, or with John Boehner-Paul Ryan/Mitch McConnell.

♦BUDGETS (or lack thereof) –  Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid never passed a federal budget.  Instead chose to use Omnibus spending bills (November/December 2009), continuing resolutions and raises in the debt ceiling to fund the federal government.
With control of the House and Senate, John Boehner/Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell similarly didn’t pass a federal budget, and also used Omnibus spending bills to fund government.   Boehner/Ryan eliminated the debt ceiling, and current funding extends through March of 2017.  No Budget until Fiscal Year 2018.
♦ OBAMACARE – Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid stripped a House spending bill in the Spring of 2010 to create the legislative vehicle for ObamaCare.  Then with a change in Senate rules, using reconciliation, the bill was passed using a simple 51 vote threshold.
With control of the House and Senate, John Boehner/Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell did not try to repeal the bill using the same method.  Instead they allowed ObamaCare to remain unaffected and funded it fully.
♦ TRADE DEAL (TPP) – Paul Ryan and Ted Cruz created the legislative vehicle for TPP’s passage in much the same way Reid constructed ObamaCare.   Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) was the legislative vehicle and was added to a House spending bill to reauthorize funding for federal police and firefighters retirement accounts.  TPA went one step further and flipped the threshold for TPP approval from a three-fifths (60 vote) approval, to a 60 vote requirement for disapproval.
Essentially “Fast Track”, within TPA created the passage for TPP as the trade deal only needed 40 votes to approve.  TPP can pass with all Democrats if needed – thanks to the construct of Senators Mitch McConnell and Ted Cruz.
Why would the republican party lower the threshold for approval if they didn’t want to give Obama the TPP win?   In short, they wouldn’t. But they did.
♦ IRAN DEAL – The Iran deal (now called a treaty) is another example of UniParty legislation.  The Corker/Cardin amendment flipped the threshold for approval from 60 votes to approve, to 60 votes needed to deny passage.
Again, thanks to the Republican construct the Iran Deal could pass with all Democrats supporting.  And that’s exactly what happened.   Now why would the republican party lower the threshold for approval, if they didn’t want to give Obama the Iran Deal win?   Again, if they didn’t, they wouldn’t – and they did.
Summary:

1. Both Republicans and Democrats working in unity to fully fund government, including DACA (Obama’s executive amnesty), through Omnibus spending.  And note, President Obama has never hand a single budget in his entire term in office.
2. Both Republicans and Democrats working in unity to pass the Iran Deal.
3. Both Republicans and Democrats working in unity to pass TPA. [The legislative vehicle for passage of the Trans Pacific Trade Deal (TPP)]

These are just three examples, there are many more as evidenced by the complete lack of veto use by President Obama (entire term EIGHT).  Both Democrats and Republicans working in unison to ensure nothing will ever reach Obama’s desk he disapproves of.
These are realities.  These are not opinions, they are actual results.

Need another example?  OK, how about the Gang-of-Eight comprehensive immigration reform bill.  It passed the Senate in October 2013.  In June of 2014 Speaker Boehner had Kevin McCarthy whip the house, and was only three days away from putting the Senate bill -without any changes- to a vote, when BOOM Eric Cantor was primaried on June 12th 2014 and the entire plan collapsed.
The Gang-of-eight bill (not a modified bill, but the actual senate bill itself) was narrowly dispatched only by the Virginia patriots who removed Majority Leader Eric Cantor 72 hours before the House vote.
Note the emphasis on “without changes“?  Why does that matter?  Because if the House  and Senate both agree on the exact same bill, it needs no further votes.  Obama signs it, and presto, the Gang-of-Eight bill, containing amnesty, is law.
Why would Speaker John Boehner not put any House immigration reform bill to a vote, which would require the Senate and House to reconcile differences?   Because Boehner was intent on not needing any changes.  Because Boehner was intent on its passage.
If the republicans were opposed to the Gang of Eight bill, why would they vote on the exact same bill, and only AFTER Boehner was sure it would pass?  Again, short answer, if they opposed it, they wouldn’t.  But that’s exactly what they did.
There is only one party, the UniParty, in Washington DC.

Both teams on the field are playing for the same owners, Wall Street.  The Trophies are all collecting in Obama’s cabinet.
Only the nomination of Donald Trump creates a second party in DC.  Trump would be the first oppositional force to the big government construct in approximately two decades.
So if Donald Trump is the second party, why would Bill Kristol be pushing for an alternative?  I can’t speak to his motives, but a Romney or Sasse would be a fallacy of false choice because they are just as aligned with the UniParty as all current politicians.
♦ The Good News – The crowd watching the game have caught on.
Now, to be fair, only about 20% of the electorate have this “in-the-weeds-level” of understanding about it.  However, the remaining 80% know something is up, because they see the outcome is identical regardless of which team is running the plays.
The UniParty can no longer hide because there is empirical evidence to prove the ideology behind their existence.  The whispers amid the crowd, previously disregarded, are now full-on shouts.   Almost the entire electorate have caught on to the ruse.  Everyone now points toward the owners box as proof because there’s clearly only one person in the suite.
Our collective awakening is what has created the Monster Vote.
Monster Voters, cross-party Americans, know that Donald Trump represents the only alternative to the UniParty.  This is also why Donald Trump support is so firm – this is why pundits repeat Trump “can say or do anything an no-one abandons him” – there is no other option for voters.  It really is that simple.
Even if Bill Kristol were to convince Mitt Romney to enter the race (doubtful) Donald Trump would still be the only alternative.   Clinton/Romney would be the UniParty vote, and Donald Trump remains the second party candidate.