Sidney Powell Discusses Latest Flynn Revelations and Judicial Proceedings…

Michael Flynn’s defense attorney Sidney Powell appears for an interview with Liz MacDonald to discuss the latest revelations in the Obama effort to target Lt. General Michael Flynn. Within the interview Ms. Powell walks through the timeline/process of FBI Director James Comey intercepting the Flynn Kislyak call and briefing former DNI James Clapper, who in turn briefed President Obama on January 4, 2017.  {Go Deep}

Additionally, Ms. Powell discusses the latest order by the DC appeals court requesting a response from Flynn’s Judge Emett Sullivan to explain why he refuses to accept the unopposed motion by the DOJ and defense team to drop the charges against Mr. Flynn.


This entry was posted in 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, Big Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Election 2020, FBI, Spygate, Spying, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

193 Responses to Sidney Powell Discusses Latest Flynn Revelations and Judicial Proceedings…

  1. msalicia56 says:

    I’m thinking way back to the Ted Stevens case that was dismissed after a ruling of prosecutorial misconduct, etc. Sullivan was the judge and Eric Holder, of all people, was the Attorney General recommending the dismissal. Something stinks, after all these years. Cognitive dissonance, so to speak. New research needs to be initiated as to why Eric Holder would recommend dismissal. Stevens was a Republican. I don’t know all the facts. This is just curious to me.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Avi says:

      Stevens had already lost the election.
      Nothing for Holder to lose.
      Its like how the ACLU defends that crazy church that protests funerals. it gives them credence that they are not a liberal front group

      Liked by 2 people

    • anthonydog says:



    • MJJ says:

      Not over yet, and expect they will be gone later when Headlines Disappear. The Appearance of Impropriety during Sunshine Headlines is often diluted and disappear later in early dawns or late night Court Orders no longer seen in future daylights.

      For example, this actually happened before when Judge Sullivan presided over the 2008 trial of U.S. Senator Ted Stevens, who was convicted of seven felony ethics violations in October. During the trial, the judge refused requests by the Defense for a mistrial to be declared, after information was revealed that the Prosecution had withheld exculpatory Brady material. Eight days after the guilty verdict, Stevens narrowly lost his reelection bid.

      As more evidence of Prosecutorial Misconduct became known in early 2009, Judge Sullivan held four prosecutors in civil contempt of court. On 1 April 2009, following a Justice Department probe that found additional evidence of Prosecutorial Misconduct, the Department of Justice recommended that Stevens’ conviction be dismissed.

      On 7 April 2009, Sullivan set aside the Conviction and Appointed a Lawyer to investigate the prosecution team for criminal contempt. Subsequently, 1 of the 4 Prosecutors held in contempt committed suicide. Ultimately, Sullivan Dismissed the Civil Contempt Charges, and No Additional charges were EVER brought against the Prosecutors. POOF! CONTEMPT GONE!

      The same happened to AG Eric Holder that was held in Contempt of Congress by Judge Amy Berman Jackson and later Dismissed by Judge Jackson as well after 2 years. POOF! CONTEMPT CHARGES GONE!

      Again, in 2014, Judge Sullivan was presiding over a case, Judicial Watch v. IRS, related to an ongoing investigation into the 2013 IRS controversy. There was an attempt to determine where the deleted emails of former IRS employee Lois Lerner had gone, what damage to her computer hard drive occurred, and what steps the IRS had taken to recover the information contained in the emails and on the hard drive. Nothing happen to anyone. POOF! CASE GONE!

      Finally, in 2015 Sullivan presided over a FOIA Lawsuit involving the matter of Hillary Clinton’s private email use while Secretary of State and nothing happen to the FBI that gave Immunity and permitted Hard Drive to erased them. Even President Trump is no longer seeking a Special Prosecutor on that either. POOF! NO LONGER MATTERS!

      What happens in Federal Courts often get delayed later and go away when involving Sanctions, Discipline and later Dismissals and the Media seldom report it because those Case have gone Media Cold NO LONGER PROFITABLE?


      • 28angelica28 says:

        Poof–Andrew Weissmann, the in fact Special Counsel charged with destroying President Trump, was actually brought up on criminal contempt charges for his behavior in the Ted Stevens case but those charges were dropped when Holder vowed to clean up his Department of Injustice. And the Supreme Court overturned his Enron convictions 9-0 (does that number sound familiar?)

        Liked by 1 person

      • meow4me2 says:

        Nice summary. Maybe Sidney Powell wants to rewrite her Creeps on a Mission book on the subject of Emmet Sullivan. Not so much hero as a pretender. Pretend to do the right thing, but delay long enough so that the real damage, the desired outcome, is achieved. Then righteously proclaim, make a lot of noise, give a pretense of justice served but the original outcome, the desired outcome, still stands.

        Sullivan has exposed himself.


    • Gary says:

      I suspect Sullivan’s reasons are simplistic – he’s an African American who’s rightfully proud of the first POTUS of color. He’s also smart enough to know that this stuff goes straight into the Oval Office of Barack Obama. This is his effort to protect the tarnishing legacy of Obama. While his action is understandable from that perspective, it’s misguided and foolish from a legal perspective. The truth is coming out and it’s ugly….


  2. I wish Sydney had need of a tax litigator. I would be honored to work for her.


  3. Brant says:

    I said a couple weeks ago, for folks in the Trump orbit going forward, please record your phone calls. Would have been grand to have Flynn release audio and transcript at a nicely opportune time.


  4. dilonsfo says:

    Don’t know if any of this is true but some damning allegations by “Girl on Fire” about Judge Sullivan and the crimes his son committed and how he was able to cover it up. Seems that if it wasn’t true she would be in big trouble with libel crimes. But I post it anyway for those who want to read it. You can judge for yourself.

    Liked by 3 people

    • coldanger says:

      Wouldn’t it be ironic if Sullivan was throwing this case to save his son, like Flynn pleading guilty to save his? That would make Sullivan twice as vile in my book…

      Liked by 3 people

    • walt39 says:

      As we’ve watched Sullivan in action it’s been clear that ‘the left owns him.’ If this story is true, it explains a lot.


  5. Perot Conservative says:

    We’re not served well by burying ourselves & the message in endless details.

    What MESSAGE do we have, and what do we NEED? (Not 50 requests.)

    1. We need Flynn’s 302 – #1 & #2.
    2. We need the Flynn telephone transcript.
    3. We need the Flynn phone call – the actual AUDIO tape.
    4. We need DOJ scope memo #3.

    Liked by 3 people

  6. Bubby says:


  7. Alli says:

    I have been suspicious of Papadopoulos and Carter Page. Could they be cut outs too? Making this treasonous operation believable?


  8. Shirley says:

    Wonder what they have on him. That is the way Dems work. They have been blackmailing people for years. ie: John Roberts.


  9. BitterC says:

    When will our media start asking some questions about HR McMaster? If conspiracy charges are filed by Durham, HR could easily be a co-conspirator


  10. An says:

    > Additionally, Ms. Powell discusses the latest order by the DC appeals court requesting a response from Flynn’s Judge Emett Sullivan to explain why he refuses to accept the unopposed motion by the DOJ and defense team to drop the charges against Mr. Flynn.

    Not quite. The judge is ORDERED to respond, it’s not a mere request, though that was an option. Additionally, he personally is ordered to respond directly, rather than via an amicus, which is what’s normally done. Even though he already has an amicus!

    This is a really subtle point, but I’ve heard many lawyers comment that they’ve never seen this done before and it’s surprising. As one lawyer put it, they chose the most rare and drastic option here.

    Along with the order mentioning the two biggest blockers to him doing what he did, it’s not a good look for Sullivan. It really looks like they want to order him to drop it and move on.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s