New York Times Report: John Durham Seeking CIA Director Brennan Communications….

…and CTH has a pretty good idea exactly what “communications” Durham is looking for. It sounds like U.S. Attorney Durham is looking for what Comey outlined in the “crown material” discussion.  First, the article from the New York Times (emphasis mine):

WASHINGTON — The federal prosecutor scrutinizing the Russia investigation has begun examining the role of the former C.I.A. director John O. Brennan in how the intelligence community assessed Russia’s 2016 election interference, according to three people briefed on the inquiry.

John H. Durham, the United States attorney leading the investigation, has requested Mr. Brennan’s emails, call logs and other documents from the C.I.A., according to a person briefed on his inquiry. He wants to learn what Mr. Brennan told other officials, including the former F.B.I. director James B. Comey, about his and the C.I.A.’s views of a notorious dossier of assertions about Russia and Trump associates. (more)

U.S. Attorney John Durham appears to be looking for a very specific email written by John Brennan to James Comey.  Because Comey wrote another email saying: ..”Brennan is insisting the Crown Material be included in the intel assessment.”

Do you remember the “crown material“?

The Christopher Steele dossier was called “Crown Material” by FBI agents within the small group during their 2016 political surveillance operation. The “Crown” description reflects the unofficial British intelligence aspect to the dossier as provided by Steele.

In May 2019 former House Oversight Chairman Trey Gowdy stated there are emails from former FBI Director James Comey that outline instructions from CIA Director John Brennan to include the “Crown Material” within the highly political Intelligence Community Assessment.

Specifically outlined by Gowdy, the wording of the Comey email is reported to say:

…”Brennan is insisting the Crown Material be included in the intel assessment.”

However, on May 23rd, 2017, in testimony -under oath- to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) John Brennan stated [@01:54:28]:

GOWDY: Director Brennan, do you know who commissioned the Steele dossier?

BRENNAN: I don’t.

GOWDY: Do you know if the bureau [FBI] ever relied on the Steele dossier as part of any court filing, applications?

BRENNAN: I have no awareness.

GOWDY: Did the CIA rely on it?


GOWDY: Why not?

BRENNAN: Because we didn’t. It wasn’t part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had. It was not in any way used as a basis for the Intelligence Community Assessment that was done. Uh … it was not.


Video of the exchange [prompted 01:54:28 just hit play]


As Victor Davis Hanson wrote at the time:

[…] James Clapper, John Brennan, and James Comey are now all accusing one another of being culpable for inserting the unverified dossier, the font of the effort to destroy Trump, into a presidential intelligence assessment—as if suddenly and mysteriously the prior seeding of the Steele dossier is now seen as a bad thing. And how did the dossier transmogrify from being passed around the Obama Administration as a supposedly top-secret and devastating condemnation of candidate and then president-elect Trump to a rank embarrassment of ridiculous stories and fibs?

Given the narratives of the last three years, and the protestations that the dossier was accurate or at least was not proven to be unproven, why are these former officials arguing at all? Did not implanting the dossier into the presidential briefing give it the necessary imprimatur that allowed the serial leaks to the press at least to be passed on to the public and thereby apprise the people of the existential danger that they faced? (read more)

Fox News Maria Bartiromo has more knowledge of the details within the 2016 political surveillance scandal than any other MSM host. Bartiromo has followed the events very closely and now she is the go-to person for those who are trying to bring the truth behind the scandal to light.

On the morning of May 20th, 2019, on her Fox Business Network show Ms. Bartiromo outlined the current issues between Comey and Brennan. WATCH:


It certainly looks like former CIA Director John Brennan has exposed himself to perjury. However, beyond that and even more disturbing, what does this say about the political intents of a weaponized intelligence apparatus?

CTH has previously outlined how the December 29th, 2016, Joint Analysis Report (JAR) on Russia Cyber Activity was a quickly compiled bunch of nonsense about Russian hacking.

The JAR was followed a week later by the January 7th, 2017, Intelligence Community Assessment. The ICA took the ridiculous construct of the JAR and then overlaid a political narrative that Russia was trying to help Donald Trump.

The ICA was the brain-trust of John Brennan, James Clapper and James Comey. While the majority of content was from the CIA, some of the content within the ICA was written by FBI Agent Peter Strzok who held a unique “insurance policy” interest in how the report could be utilized in 2017. NSA Director Mike Rogers would not sign up to the “high confidence” claims, likely because he saw through the political motives of the report.

(JUNE 2019 – New York Times) […] Mr. Barr wants to know more about the C.I.A. sources who helped inform its understanding of the details of the Russian interference campaign, an official has said. He also wants to better understand the intelligence that flowed from the C.I.A. to the F.B.I. in the summer of 2016.

During the final weeks of the Obama administration, the intelligence community released a declassified assessment that concluded that Mr. Putin ordered an influence campaign that “aspired to help” Mr. Trump’s electoral chances by damaging Mrs. Clinton’s. The C.I.A. and the F.B.I. reported they had high confidence in the conclusion. The National Security Agency, which conducts electronic surveillance, had a moderate degree of confidence. (read more)

Questioning the construct of the ICA is a smart direction to take for a review or investigation. By looking at the intelligence community work-product, it’s likely Durham will cut through a lot of the chatter and get to the heart of the intelligence motives.

Apparently John Durham is looking into just this aspect: Was the ICA document a politically engineered report stemming from within a corrupt intelligence network?

The importance of that question is rather large. All of the downstream claims about Russian activity, including the Russian indictments promoted by Rosenstein and the Mueller team, are centered around origination claims of illicit Russian activity outlined in the ICA.

If the ICA is a false political document…. then guess what?

Yep, the entire narrative from the JAR and ICA is part of a big fraud. [Which it is]

(Read ICA via pdf)

This entry was posted in AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, CIA, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Election 2016, FBI, IG Report Comey, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, Legislation, media bias, President Trump, Professional Idiots, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

283 Responses to New York Times Report: John Durham Seeking CIA Director Brennan Communications….

  1. Orson says:

    Allow me to save time. “We’re sorry. Those emails seem to be missing.” Carry on…

    Liked by 15 people

    • Loggerman says:

      Seems to me Durham has talked to a lot of underlings to finally get to this point with Brennen. Durham already knows what he’s looking for, Brennen better be in his toes. 😀

      Liked by 3 people

    • RJ says:

      You won’t believe this but I happen to be the care taker at John Brennan’s property. I was given the task of cleaning up his attic where I discovered a box containing some documents I needed to ask former Director Brennan as to what I should do with them.

      The documents were 1) Russian Dossier, 2) Obama’s Birth Certificate, 3) Obama’s College History (complete), 4) Obama’s orders on his Senate Campaign, 5) Obama’s Private Communications with Russia, 6) Obama’s Secret Correspondence with Iranian leaders, 7) Obama’s Social Security History, and of course a file on Obama’s Enemies.

      Director Brennan took this large box and then walked into his library where a large fire in the fireplace was roaring. I never saw the box again.

      On Director Brennan’s desk in his library I did see a manuscript titled “Up in Smoke” which appeared not yet finished.

      I don’t know what any of this means…really, I don’t. What’s even more funny is that as I was driving home I spotted Attorney General Barr getting off the same exit as I chose.

      That puzzled me, why was Barr taking an off ramp to nowhere?

      Liked by 1 person

    • 6x47 says:

      “The devices were smashed with hammers. And then we lost the hammers.”

      Liked by 3 people

    • Peter Berg says:

      Nothing goes missing in a modern networked system if you really want to find it. There are backups of every server an email touches and the backups are incremental and cold and that email would of flowed through many servers. The credulity of the press in this regard is amazing. If they wanted Hillary’s emails they could have been recovered. It might have taken a lot of time and effort but they are there somewhere backed up on two different media stored in different locations. The stuff on modern servers is just too damn valuable to lose.

      Liked by 1 person

    • bluenova1971 says:

      Orson, there is no such thing as “missing” emails…the NSA has ensured this.


    • Y’all Know What Time It says:

      Unfortunately no one can trust the CIA FBI IRS because of Obama.


  2. Publius Syrus says:

    Finally someone explains the fundamental flaw of FISA, a fact thats been lost, or failed to be reminded lately….see Judge Nap at 07:00 of that third youtube, which has 800,000 views btw

    Liked by 2 people

    • Ospreyzone says:

      The fundamental flaw of FISA is that it is a SECRET COURT operating in the United States of America. Our founding fathers would have been shooting by now.

      Liked by 11 people

      • 6x47 says:

        Just a reminder, before FISC was created, there were no checks whatsoever on the intelligence community. It was entirely up to the agencies to self-police, relying upon the integrity of the men entrusted with the vast power of US intelligence apparatus to not misuse it. Of course they did – so a court was created in an effort to enforce some kind of accountability.

        Make no mistake: FISC is almost completely useless, except insofar as lying and submitting false affidavits creates a crime for which there would otherwise be no record at all. Think of it like a restraining order: It doesn’t protect anything, but violating it is a crime. It gives prosecutors SOMETHING to work with after bad acts occur.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Issy says:

          I will believe the fisc is if some use when everyone who signed off on a lie or misled the court is fired, disbarred and jailed for what time the statute requires. Otherwise, it’s useless. I’m really tired of all this and totally disgusted with the doj/fbi/judiciary.

          Liked by 1 person

    • Coast says:

      You mean a secret court is one-sided and can lead to corruption? Say it ain’t so.

      Liked by 11 people

    • JoeB says:

      “Judge Nap” is a traitorous little troll who laughs insipitously at his own stupid jokes.

      He didn’t get his nomination from Pres. Trump for SCOTUS and has since become the “judicial” face of the Never-Trumpers.

      His comments are not worth anyone’s consideration.

      Liked by 16 people

  3. WES says:

    Here is what I find very disconcerting.

    We are getting a steady flow of leaks about what Durham is supposedly doing.

    This does not jive with a true criminal investigation.

    In a true criminal investigations there are no leaks.

    That we are getting leaks can only mean Durham is doing a report, just as Barr said.

    A report by Summer 2020.

    Liked by 4 people

    • The Boss says:

      Durham isn’t leaking. The targets are leaking. It’s what they do.

      Liked by 26 people

      • Navybuckeye says:

        Boss, exactly. It’s why the story is in the Times. Leak came from the FBI.

        Liked by 10 people

      • dwpender says:

        I agree that the targets are generally the leakers. The much ballyhooed “Grand Jury secrecy” applies to prosecutors, court personnel and grand jurors, NOT to witnesses, recipients of document subpoenas (or the attorneys or other agents of either).

        What IS alarming about this specific leaking is that the leakers are part of Team Brennan/IC, but they are NOT on the outside. They are CIA/IC insiders, where the likes of Ciaramella, etc still reside.

        Liked by 1 person

        • bluenova1971 says:

          Not sure about that.

          Wouldn’t it be plausible to assume that if Durham subpoenaed an individual’s phone or emails, the individual would be a party to such a subpoena?


          • dwpender says:

            Your question is a good one. This could get extremely complicated to analyze.

            The basis for my present conclusion is that the NYT says Durham has “requested” (not subpoenaed) the records, AND those records sound like government records.

            Liked by 2 people

            • bluenova1971 says:

              NYT (and other MSM) automatically considers any Dim congresscritter’s request as a “subpoena”, and anyone investigating Deep State players is automatically a “request”.


              Liked by 1 person

              • Ned Zeppelin says:

                Agree 100%. Absolutely defensive leaks by the targets, not Durham. Be at least skeptical of claims to the contrary. Which side of this fight has made the use of leaks a tactical weapon? Three guesses.

                Liked by 1 person

      • ms doodlebug says:

        Keeping their partners in crime up to date on the progress of Durham’s investigation? No emails, no phone calls to trace, just quiet little meets in the alley?


    • Loggerman says:

      Unless the people he is investigating are leaking.

      Liked by 5 people

    • 6x47 says:

      On the contrary – leaks and indictments are indications that a real investigation is underway. Recall that was the key difference between the Mueller probe and the Huber investigation. Mueller provided a steady stream of leaks and indictments; the Huber investigation was dead quiet and produced absolutely nothing. Still hasn’t: Turns out Stealth Jeff and Undercover Huber weren’t silent assassins after all: They were just silent.

      Liked by 2 people

      • I believe it was here that I read how pleased some on the left were of the FBI investigator on Durham’s team.


      • bluenova1971 says:

        6×47, I’m still not convinced Huber is is a dud just yet.

        I know we haven’t heard anything re. a Huber investigation.

        Isn’t he based in Utah?
        Doesn’t NSA maintain a huge data collection operation in Utah?

        I’m not totally a “trust the plan” guy, but there is this possibility.


        • 6x47 says:

          The story is, Huber is looking into the MYE (Clinton email investigation, the first IG report) but that he was in a holding pattern awaiting the release of the FISA IG report (the one just published.) Perhaps Mr. Huber will awaken from his stupor and things will begin happening.

          Liked by 1 person

          • Ned Zeppelin says:

            The role of Huber remains a mystery; the fact that he was appointed by a weak Jeff Sessions is not a good sign, but you never know, he could be the time bomb hiding behind assumptions of irrelevance purposely pushed by those who are on top of this. Wasn’t his job all things Hillary?


  4. I picture him leaving some jim bakker skid marks leaving his sentencing.


  5. fangdog says:

    I often wonder if Putin wanted to weaken the US why in ten times of hell would he want to help Trump become President. It is Hillary who would have the US heading for Venezuela in a hand-car.

    Imagine the US economy right now had Hillary won? We would more likely be looking at a stock market below 10,000 not counting all the other corrupt, crooked loss of freedom for the American people. I would think Hillary and Putin have way more in common than Trump and Putin…..not even close.

    Liked by 17 people

    • Patrick Healy says:

      Meanwhile while all the Crown material was being put together by my virulently anti Trump British government, the present head of the cia (some female – can’t remember her name) was the chief American spy in the US embassy in London. This after some unsavoury activity she instigated in the far east by torturing prisoners.
      Pure coincidence?
      A Brennan clown (clone).

      Liked by 2 people

      • warrprin1 says:

        PH, her name is Gina Haspel and she needs a bona-fide Come-to-Jesus encounter.

        My preference would be that this spook be:
        a) fired with loss of pension – just for the torture business you mentioned, and for her connection to the coup contrivers as she lurked about in London,
        b) thoroughly investigated for all subversive activity in which she appears to have been involved against the President-Elect / POTUS Trump, and
        c) indicted and convicted, followed by the experience of a lengthy in-house confinement, fashionably attired in orange as the new black.

        Liked by 2 people

    • BitterC says:

      One of the biggest reasons I rejected the Trump Russia collusion narrative from day 1.

      Putin has DECADES of kompromat on Hillary. Pretty sure he has those missing emails, too. He also knows her. both from her yrs as 1st lady as well as SoS. The Kremlin has probably been bugging and intercepting everything Clinton since Bubba took office and never stopped. That’s what they do.

      Skolkovo & Uranium One.

      Whatever came of the claim Putin himself made about (I forget) $40 million or $400K in illegal donations? His figure was corrected and then it was forgotten

      Liked by 8 people

    • Dee Paul Deje says:

      This is what I tell brainwashed CNN/MSNBC leftist zombies that keep saying Trump is Putin’s puppet. “Putin must really like to MAGA then.”

      Liked by 5 people

      • fangdog says:

        It is like these Libtard leftist media people have no sense at all the American people. Are they strictly as indoctrinated as their “Useful Idiot” viewers?

        It appears so, but makes one wonder if they are just high paid actors who follow a script each day. I don’t know, maybe they really do believe their own lies. I see them as communist propagandist no different than media propagandist in Communist countries such as; North Korea, China and Cuba as an example.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Lefty says:

          You’ll notice these networks don’t even bother hiring journalists anymore…. all they do is hire former (partisan) political hacks who just use the networks to continue their political activity after they leave office. That’s why all the news if fake now. Its just political propaganda dressed up as news.

          Liked by 1 person

    • The Devilbat says:

      There is one reason that you might consider. THe military industrial complex and the rest of the deep state were planning to go to war with Russia. Putin addressed a meeting of the American media and almost begged them to report what was happening.

      Meanwhile in Russia the word on the street was that war was coming. people were storing dried beans and other foodstuffs in preparation to it. Hillary Clinton being completely clueless would have easily been led by the deep state to do their bidding. Putin knew that all too well.

      Meanwhile, candidate Trump had made it quite clear that he wanted peace instead of war. He made several statements about how nice it would be for the US and Russia to be friends and actually get along with each other. His statements were then used to reinforce the lie that he was a Russian asset.

      To sum up, I honestly believe that Putin would easily have preferred Trump to Clinton.

      Liked by 7 people

    • OldParatrooper says:

      Dog, somewhere between 90 and 95% of Americans thought Hillary would wipe the floor with Trump. If Putin did throw the weight of Russian election interference behind Trump its still unlikely the Russians thought he would win, but were interfering as best they could. Their goal would have been to reduce Hillary’s margin and make her look weaker.


      • fangdog says:

        I read a very intensive private poll taken in July 2016. It was a poll of 1,000 registered voters from each State, one third Democrats, Republicans and Independents (50,000). The poll results showed Trump would win rather easily. From that point on I never worried about whether Trump would be elected, with the exception of voter-fraud.

        Liked by 3 people

    • botchedcasuality says:

      Do t you mean another escalation in the Middle East, & regime change in Syria?
      Trillions to squander and rake in graft? A dimm daughter exhaulted to a government pedestal, more citizens losing homes and taking the bus to their minimum wage jobs?

      Liked by 3 people

  6. InAz says:

    So many need to hang for the Sedition.

    I would like to see the Commie Kenyan get nailed to the wall…..he would not be so smug then, with his nose in the air.. what a 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 he is.

    I know, a pipe dream. Because certain azz wipes are above the law.

    Liked by 3 people

    • TeaForAll says:

      Never gonna happen. This country could not deal with a former Black president and all the corruption.and spying on a White Presidential candidate. Racism at its finest.. The Swamp will protect Obama

      Liked by 3 people

      • Dee Paul Deje says:

        IDK, polls are showing POTUS has 35% approval rating among African Americans and climbing. The awakening is here.

        Liked by 4 people

      • dasantacroce says:

        This time I think is different. The president is not a swamp creature and they came for his family. The worst outcome is for the Dems to have DJT trash them thru the upcoming campaign season. And he has offered the Republican Party hegemony.

        Liked by 4 people

  7. J.Thomas says:

    Crown Material: UK-generated material

    Money flowed in to Halper (did Halper receive any DNC money laundered through Perkins Coie and Fusion GPS?). Halper ran the black op off the books. Halper had at least three handlers: James Baker at ONET, FBI agent, and one or more of UK/FusionGPS/Orbis/Hakluyt. Halper oversaw Mifsud, Putin’s Niece, Downer, Thompson, and Turk. Maybe Henry Greenberg as well.

    Liked by 5 people

  8. TimDetroit says:

    This exchange is interesting:

    GOWDY: Do you know if the bureau [FBI] ever relied on the Steele dossier as part of any court filing, applications?
    BRENNAN: I have no awareness.
    GOWDY: Did the CIA rely on it?
    BRENNAN: No.
    GOWDY: Why not?
    BRENNAN: Because we didn’t. It wasn’t part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had. It was not in any way used as a basis for the Intelligence Community Assessment that was done. Uh … it was not.

    It’s interesting because Gowdy never asked anything about the ICA. Brennan gave a specific answer to a question never asked. People who are lying/worried tend to offer explanations for things about which they self-consciously most concerned. We of course now know the Steele Dossier was used in the ICA.

    Liked by 11 people

  9. Really like to see The Day coup Brennan Go To jail for a long Time,
    He is nothing But corrupt Deep state coup That hate’s president Trump,

    Liked by 2 people

  10. tommylotto says:

    Shouldn’t this have already been investigated by our inspector general for the intelligence community, or is he too busy changing rules to transform criminal leakers of classified information into legally protected whistleblowers?

    Liked by 8 people

  11. Doug Amos says:

    Sundance seems optimistic; pertains well.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Matt Bracken says:


  13. Matt Bracken says:

    Liked by 8 people

    • Lady Sid says:

      For the past couple of years all I ever saw were these curled-lip, narrowed-eyes images of John Brennan. Looks like a real tough guy. Well, it was a revelation to see a video of him recently speaking and moving around. He is not physically large and I would say his fussy gestures are those of a guy who’s a little “light in the loafers,” if you know what I mean. Also has a surprisingly high-pitched voice. Perfect person to conduct some real skulduggery for presidential candidate BHO back in 2008 and even earlier, i. e. a MEAN so-and-so. Brennan then was awarded Director CIA position as a thank-you gift by President Obama.

      Liked by 6 people

  14. Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

    Three years after and crooked Fake News NYT is still spinning for the spooks.

    And they wonder why Trump supporters don’t trust the mainstream news.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Please please please! Let him take the walk of traitor shame in an orange jumpsuit, in shackles and handcuffs or let him eat his gun!!🙏🙏🙏


  16. iconoclast says:

    I have believed all along that this trail would lead to Brennan, and to Obama from there. Just keep peeling the onion, and they’ll be there. It will be interesting to see if Durham is able to actually get the emails he is seeking.

    Liked by 3 people

    • TPW says:

      Nothing will come of it based on my interpretation of Barr interview. I think Barr knows how much info is out there and that he has to address the issues and give some lame reason why……..The fact that we all are expecting the big screw but yet have no plans to counter it is what is disappointing to me. No telling how many innocent people these goons have put in prison……I guess they will continue on with this evil.

      Liked by 1 person

  17. 335blues says:

    A glaring ommission from the entirity of the
    discussion of the alphabet spy agencies false efforts to ‘expose and stop foreign interference in our elections’, read topple Donald Trump’s presidency, is communist china.
    I have been reading about the capture and expulsion of hundreds of chinese spys from America, and it seems to have been going on for years.
    I have often thought about who are the masters of the marxist cabal that infests our government. Who are their handlers? Communist china’s absence in our discussion sticks out like a black eye.
    Who is suffering most from MAGA?
    The trail leads there.

    Liked by 6 people

  18. Zippy says:

    NOTE: based upon enforcement data, this only applies to anti-globalist, anti-deep state peons.

    What happens if you lie to Congress?

    Q: What are the rules about lying to Congress?

    A: Glad you asked. If you are testifying in front of Congress sometime soon, and are wondering how far you can bend the truth, there are a two key statutes governing perjury you need to be aware of: U.S. Code sections 1621 and 1001 of Title 18.

    Section 1621 covers general perjury, and stipulates that anyone who “willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true” is guilty of perjury and shall be fined or imprisoned up to five years, or both. Section 1001 covers false statements more generally, without requiring an oath. The section stipulates that “whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the government of the United States, knowingly and willfully” falsifies or conceals information, including before a congressional committee’s inquiry, may also be fined or imprisoned up to five years.

    Q: What potential punishment would someone who lied to Congress face?

    A: If you paid attention during the last section, you may have read that general perjury comes with a maximum five-year prison sentence and potential fine. The same basically goes for not telling the truth to Congress, even without an oath. However, if the lie under Section 1001 involves terrorism, the maximum prison sentence rises to eight years.

    Liked by 2 people

  19. John Good says:

    IMO, President Trump should call a Press Conference at the White House for anything that the MSM would “salivate over” & then announce something like:

    Since the following people are under criminal investigation for fraud with taxpayer’s money, treason, bribery & other pending criminal charges, by John Durham I am immediately instituting a travel-ban (because I think that they may be flight-risks & try to go top countries where the USA does not have extradition treaties with) & also I am putting a “freeze on assets being moved offshore”!

    And then proceed to name all the people who John Durham is investigating!

    This should make the lying MSM heads explode!

    I know it is a fantasy of mine, but I feel that since President Trump has been more aggressive & emboldened lately, I think that he should consider this. Besides, this might just make more people aware of how exactly their “favorite Politicians” are scamming their Country & Trump will gain more Democrats that turned Republican!

    Liked by 1 person

  20. jeans2nd says:

    “has requested”
    Not subpoenaed. Requested.
    It has been reported the CIA is “cooperating” with Atty Durham’s investigation.

    Let me know when “requested” becomes “subpoenaed.”

    Liked by 1 person

  21. Les Standard says:

    How could anyone get away with an elaborate blackmail scheme like Epstein supposedly had, right under the noses of the 17 headed CIA snake?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Joemama says:

      Very simple answer: Epstein probably worked for the C_A.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Jimmy Jack says:

      Simple. He was working for the C I A. For years. And the sex blackmail stuff is shaping up to be only the tip of the iceberg and salacious enough to detract from what else he was up to and who he was involved with.

      Epstein will eventually be shown to be linked back to pilots, Teeterboro airport, Venice FL airport etc. George Webb has done an extensive investigation into this and it continues.

      And Ghislane Maxwell and her murdered media mogul father were intelligence assets as well. This will eventually be shown to link the Mossad, C I A, and M16/Crown intelligence.


  22. kittytrump84 says:

    Of all the sons a bitch deep state traitors it’s Brennan I despise the most. He has no soul.

    Liked by 5 people

  23. scorpion99man says:

    It looks like someone is going to have to take the fall. This sort of reminds me of Poindexter and Iran/Contra. Mr. Brennan seems to be it.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Mr e-man says:

    So Mike Rogers had a moderate degree of confidence that the information was correct? Doesn’t that mean he had confidence it was correct?

    If he is supposedly one of the good guys then even he agrees an investigation would be properly predicated?

    Liked by 1 person

  25. mike diamond says:

    The deep state is more like a bottom less pit ! Pray and Pray always,in every place!

    Liked by 1 person

  26. allfromnone says:

    The ICA’s claim of 17 Intelligence Agency consensus was always bullshit. Stop for a second and ask yourself…why would Coast Guard Intelligence have ANY information on Russian election interference via hacking, and how are they in a position to provide concurrence?

    They wouldn’t and they aren’t , along with about 12-13 other agencies — That weren’t in a position to even provide an educated assessment.

    The truth is that only 3-4 organizations concurred with that assessment. And most of them concurred under top down DNI pressure.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s