Devin Nunes Responds To Adam Schiff “Subpoenaing” Private Phone Records….

HPSCI Ranking Member Devin Nunes responds to the possibilities of how HPSCI Chairman Adam Schiff gained private phone records for use in his impeachment effort.

.

One of the possibilities is that Lev Parnas is a foreign national. SDNY gets a subpoena from the FISA court.  Rudy Giuliani is in contact with Parnas (1-hop). They then unmask and pull Giuliani’s records and get Nunes and Solomon (2-hops).

The question would then be how did the unmasked information in an active investigation that started in the FISC end up being sent to the House Intel Committee to be disclosed to the public?

This entry was posted in 1st Amendment, 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Election 2020, FBI, IG Report FISA Abuse, Impeachment, Legislation, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Spying, Typical Prog Behavior, Ukraine, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

314 Responses to Devin Nunes Responds To Adam Schiff “Subpoenaing” Private Phone Records….

  1. deplorable says:

    Secret FISA courts and the “Patriot” Act (violation of 4th amendment Constitutional rights) empower the surveillance state.

    Liked by 9 people

  2. dahimm says:

    Interesting comment by McCallum at the end, “…if you can’t get the transcript (of the call) its hard to figure out where this would go.”. NOT REALLY. This type of information is best used for,
    a) building a case of innuendo against individuals. The transcripts just destroy that possibility by revealing the non-significance of the call.
    b) potential blackmail scenarios, ie. “We’re going to drag your name through the mud with this unless you cooperate”. We already see how Schiff is more than willing to do a) …

    Liked by 14 people

    • Mr e-man says:

      Not to mention the Flynn trap. The FBI ask Nunes about his conversations with Parnas. Nunes doesn’t remember a 2 minute call and says he hasn’t spoken to Parnas. The FBI changes the 302 to indicate Nunes was lying. Boom. Fiances ruined, reputation shattered, job lost, family destroyed, die in prison.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Lester Smith says:

      Dont worry about other countries. Our big brother knows all, see’s all and has all. The fox to watch out for is the one that already lives in the hen house.

      Like

  3. dahimm says:

    Interesting comment by McCallum at the end, “…if you can’t get the transcript (of the call) its hard to figure out where this would go.”. NOT REALLY. This type of information is best used for,
    a) building a case of innuendo against individuals. The transcripts just destroy that possibility by revealing the non-significance of the call.
    b) potential blackmail scenarios, ie. “We’re going to drag your name through the mud with this unless you cooperate”. We already see how Schiff is more than willing to do a) …

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Jederman says:

    There is, at this point, no way of knowing how many more call records this slug has. It would be prudent to assume the POS has more in abeyance waiting for the right moment or use.

    You can play defense all you want but they will never stop. Eventually, unless they’re crushed, they will get you.

    There is not a doubt in my mind that PT wants to be a good president for ALL the citizens but he is not a pol and he doesn’t NEED this job.

    Rather than die by a thousand petty, sneaky, low life cuts and eventually have to surrender, just burn it all to the ground. Half of us know it’s rotten to the core and can’t ever be repaired or function as originally intended.

    Liked by 9 people

    • Dee says:

      True, I know Trump loves this country and he is our stop gap right now. None the less I would hate to see him not run, but the man and his family do not deserve the ENDLESS attacks the Dems will continue into a second term. I am behind him if he chooses to walk away from the hate trump ghetto of DeeCee.

      Liked by 3 people

      • muckeyduck says:

        Are you kidding me, Trump thrives in this environment. He is a counter-puncher. To be an effective counter-fighter, you have to have incoming punches. A counter-fighter takes the incoming and uses the offense to set up a trap, and therefore creates opportunity to counter. In other words, a counter-fighter uses the weight of the opponent to against them.

        Where you and I would fall apart under the constant attacks, Trump is fueled off of them.,

        Liked by 4 people

      • Cynthia says:

        NO. That would be giving them exactly what they want. I have confidence that President Trump is going to continue to fight the good fight and will only leave after his next term. Praying that will be so.

        Like

      • donna kovacevic says:

        Amen. I have said many times before POTUS and family are treated horribly, those pederi demoncraps are the lowest of them all and the RHINOs. I pray for PDJT daily, and honestly he deserves time to enjoy the rest of his life with family and friends. I don’t see his supporters or the republican party fighting hard along with him, so why bother. Let the country go to hell in a hand basket, it looks like it is well deserved. Please, I don’t wish that on the Patriots, but look at France the yellow vests as one example, people getting together, which I don’t see in the USA. God Bless PDJT, his Family along with the Patriots.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Risa says:

        The Left would not be content to let PDJT or his family to simply retire from the battlefield.
        Several Leftists have publicly stated their intention to see them destroyed, pursuing them even after they leave the White House. Surely President Trump understands this.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Trump can’t walk away, how could you think that. The left has made it clear they will initiate multiple criminal investigations against Trump and his entire family once he is out of office, independent of the success of impeachment / removal from office. If he doesn’t take down the left cabal during his second term the Trump family will never be out of the shit.

        Liked by 4 people

      • Jennifer Verner says:

        So you think that would stop them? Nope. It would just make it easier for them to destroy him and his kids. He needs to win and then utterly grind them into dust. They are EVIL and hate not only him, but US.

        Like

  5. Justin Green says:

    Let’s see the Bidens’ phone records for the past eight years.

    Talking negatively about, and later recalling, a corrupt US Ambassador is one of 25,000 reasons I voted for Trump. It wasn’t illegal.

    Yovanovitch was anything but “anti-corruption” as Schiff’s report repeatedly claims. She lied in Congress about knowing about the Bidens’ improper dealings.

    Throw her and Kent and the Biden’s on the same pile of crooks that need investigation along with Hillary, Obama, Comey, Clapper, etc., etc.

    Liked by 6 people

    • Mr e-man says:

      That Harvard “Professor” also lied to Congress. He has been saying everything Trump does is impeachable. He is working hard to impeach Trump. Then he tells Congress he was an impeachment skeptic? Lie.

      Ask Roger stone about that.

      Liked by 4 people

  6. bluebongo says:

    Isn’t Eric Ciaramella CIA? Didn’t he work directly with Schitt’s office? Didn’t little Schitt do everything in his power to prevent the little CIA spy from testifying?

    How many more clues do we need?

    Liked by 6 people

  7. Hoop says:

    Duration of call “0.00 sec.”

    nice.

    Liked by 2 people

    • islandpalmtrees says:

      Someone picked up Nune’s phone, made a call, then hung up. They would have needed a group of agents or this.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Mr e-man says:

        I actually thought it was possible Guiliani and Nunes were together and placed a quick call. Or someone had Nunes call Guiliani at that number.

        In any case, why would Nunes be calling this Parnas guy for a 2 minute call? And who the hell is this Parnas? Guiliani is his attorney and the government can trace what his attorney is doing? How is that fair if the government is prosecuting Parnas and surveilling his attorney. That should be illegal.

        Liked by 1 person

  8. Elle says:

    You know why our government does’t work? There are not enough honorable men like Nunes in it.

    We need a rewrite so that ONLY people who reside in the state can send money to or lobby their reps or ANY public office, including dog-catcher. Businesses should only be able to lobby in proportion to the number of people they employ within the state. Right now, it is in the interests of China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Russian and others to spend big money to flip small offices, community organizing their way to a point where the states are run entirely by compromised individuals or willing puppets of the globalists.

    We need a re-do. It would be worth it just to watch Tom Donahue’s head explode.

    Liked by 9 people

    • George 1 says:

      They just did it in Boise Elle. The previous Boise mayor was a left leaning democrat. The one just put in office is a hard left controller who Bill De Blasio would be proud of.

      The left is wining from where I sit.

      Like

      • Elle says:

        While in office, Obama went to Boise State and said something like, “Nice red state you got here, we aim to turn it blue. It’s easier to flip the smaller states.

        Like

        • fangdog says:

          Idaho has always been a conservative people. However a lot of Libtard Californians have moved to Idaho and brought with them the reason they left California.

          Liked by 2 people

          • swissik says:

            Exactly fangdog and the same is true for NV, OR, AZ, and starting in UT, TX, CO. There are probably others too.

            Like

            • fangdog says:

              What is tough to understand is why Californians want to their new State to be like the reason they left California?

              The only answer I can come up; Is Libtards lack; judgement, rationale and common sense or it would be impossible to be a Libtard. For lack of anything else, it has to be a missing gene along the line. Changing location has nothing to do with a cure. They just make life miserable for those who are natives of the Libtards newly found State.

              Like

              • muckeyduck says:

                Hearing how California residents are flooding red states like Texas, Florida, caused me to worry that a leftist strategy is being played out to intentionally drive people flip red states blue. But then I read somewhere, and it make sense if you think about it, that the majority of people leaving blue state blues are the more conservative people.

                Think about it, the California residents that live in red counties are hit just as hard by oppressive taxes, regulations, mismanagement as those that live in liberal counties. Who do you think is more likely to leave and move to a red state.

                I’m sure there are stats available somewhere, but I can’t find a good source.

                Like

  9. thedoc00 says:

    Again, closely read Schiff’s summary and narrative from his Crypt & Clown Show Testimony Report. The democrats are angling towards a “conspiracy to impact the 2020 elections” charge in the articles of impeachment. They are aiming to remove the entire “Republican Executive”. Plus use this information to bring Nunes and the other House Republicans kicking their butts at the hearing before the ethics committee to be removed or silenced in some manner.

    Notice, the phone records are sprinkled throughout the report and summary as evidence supporting the conspiracy claim. Never mind the content and context of the calls, those are immaterial to the motives of Democrats. It’s all about appearance.

    It opens all the named parties in those phone records to turning over transcripts and/or testifying under oath about the phone calls to attempt to refute the optics, again playing into the hands of the lawfare folks who can shape the questions.

    A dirty trick and clever trap.

    Also, for those asking why the Republicans do not issue subpoenas, look no further than House and/or Senate Rules. Unless approval is specifically (and carefully) allocated to a Committee Chair for a specific reason, those requests have to be approved by the Leadership of the respective legislative body. This is the reason Ryan hung on to the Speakership until January 2019, he squashed every subpoena attempt made by Nunes and Freedom caucus members. We all know where McConnell stand v/v supporting the President.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Elle says:

      When I keep hearing that the Senate will never convict, it reminds me of how everyone said the Turkish generals would step in and allow us to use their bases in the Iraq war. Generals fighting the last war.

      I feel zero confidence that the Senate will not convict. Not saying they will. Just saying there is a reasonable possibility that they could.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Roni says:

      Excellent comment, thedocoo. They are looking to silence Nunes just like in 2017 when they filed ethics complaints…..retribution and fear.
      The second point about subpoenas…….that’s why losing the House in 2018 was a disaster. All that talk about impeachment and Ds losing seats is just that, talk. If Ronna/RNC have no ground work to recruit and support viable candidates in 2020, the Schiff show will continue as long as PDJT is in office.

      Liked by 3 people

  10. Boots says:

    If at first you don’t succeed……

    Like

  11. FilthySanchez03 says:

    this guy is unbelievable.
    Even if he were to face charges, I have no doubts the case would land in a court with a judge sympathetic to the Democrats.
    On the other hand, a bullet always tells the truth(J Creasy 2004). I wonder what would happen if these pukes had a fear of waking up dead…

    Like

    • John Ronning says:

      It would be good if everyone remembered (or knew in the first place) that we have elections as an alternative to armed conflict. If one side keeps rejecting the results of elections, what’s going to happen?

      Like

    • muckeyduck says:

      Read Term Limits, Vince Flynn’s first novel.
      Summary from Goodreads:

      TAKING AMERICA BACK … ONE POLITICIAN AT A TIME
      In one bloody night, three of Washington’s most powerful politicians are executed with surgical precision. Their assassins then deliver a shocking ultimatum to the American government: set aside partisan politics and restore power to the people. No one, they warn, is out of their reach—not even the president.

      A joint FBI-CIA task force reveals the killers are elite military commandos, but no one knows exactly who they are or when they will strike next. Only Michael O’Rourke, a former U.S. Marine and freshman congressman, holds a clue to the violence: a haunting incident in his own past with explosive implications for his country’s future ..

      Like

  12. Rick says:

    Lil’ Adam Schiff acts like he is obstructing justice. Like he’s abusing his powers to manage the information flow that leads to his own personal crimes. This begs the question: of all the IMF funds gone missing, how much of it filtered it’s way back to him, and or his family?

    Did Lil’ Adam Schiff facilitate OCUS illegal campaign funds to the Clinton foundation?

    Of (what appears to be) the Epstein CIA blackmail operations, what was his involvement?

    Do any legal exports believe Adam Schiff’s behavior and actions thus far have formed an adequate predicate to open a formal investigation into these matters?

    Like

  13. gary says:

    i have to believe that barr hasn’t launched on this.

    Like

  14. icanhasbailout says:

    The simplest explanation seems to be lawless sedition inside NSA.

    Next simplest explanation is that they have another FISA warrant and it’s an active one.

    What could possibly be the legal basis of such a warrant? More fabrications and fraud?

    Like

  15. Deplorable_Infidel says:

    https://thefederalist.com/2019/12/06/the-feds-dont-need-to-tell-you-or-get-a-warrant-to-collect-your-emails-and-phone-records/

    According to this article, Mr. Shiff can. I cannot post a clip with this phone and web browser, though

    Liked by 2 people

    • Justin Green says:

      Interesting. Also interesting that emails 180 days or older are considered “abandoned” and can be requested by the government without a warrant.

      That’s asinine and unconstitutional. Guess it’s never been challenged.

      Like

  16. arze says:

    Attorney Leslie McAdoo Gordon, in a Federalist essay published this morning, says Schiff was in his right to obtain the call records, which did not include contents of those telephone calls, but her analysis missed an essential ingredient that she should have address, which might have altered her analysis.

    https://thefederalist.com/2019/12/06/the-feds-dont-need-to-tell-you-or-get-a-warrant-to-collect-your-emails-and-phone-records/

    She says there is nothing that can be done as that is legal.

    However, in dispute, which she did not address at all, is the requirement that any Congressional Committee action MUST have a legislative purpose.

    Absent a legislative purpose, Congress does not have absolute authority to subpoena individuals nor records, in fact, that would be unconstitutional. Congressional power is wide and sweeping, but not absolute, as No One Is Above The Law.

    There has been no vote to Impeach President Trump. Only if a president is impeached, may a Congress assert their own “prosecutorial” rights to subpoena material that is outside of its core function of legislating.

    Prosecuting is not legislating, but Impeachment grants them the extra subpoena power.

    Absent a vote that is passed to impeach a president, this congress had no right to those telephone records as that has nothing to do with creating laws.

    Or, at minimum, the subpoena will go to the supreme court.

    What is instructive is a similar ongoing legal brouhaha viz. Trump’s tax returns.

    Shortly after Trump was elected, when Republicans controlled both houses of congress, the following was stated in an essay as follows, from University of Iowa law professor Andy Grewal, posted Feb. 2017 at Yale Journal on Regulation:

    [[[Even if a congressional committee requests President Trump’s tax returns from the IRS, President Trump may have a constitutional defense to disclosure. That is, although Section 6103(f) is phrased in absolute terms — it allows tax committees and the JCT Chief of Staff to obtain tax return information, without qualification — any congressional action, including requests for information, must come within the scope of legislative powers granted by Article I of the Constitution. And a request for President Trump’s tax returns, if made for purely political purposes, may exceed legislative powers.]]]

    https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/can-congress-get-president-trumps-tax-returns/

    This is why the ongoing battle over Trump’s tax returns may go to Supreme Court — and exactly why recent House phone records subpoenas may, also go to SC; because: what is the legislative purpose of obtaining them?

    The House has yet to vote to actually Impeach, as they may not have the votes — if they did, they would have already.

    And if they did, the constitutionality of the phone records subpoena would not be in dispute.

    This is one reason why they are rushing around.

    They are flying by the seat of their pants.

    Keep in mind that impeachment proceedings require an actual vote of Congress; this part has been wonderfully obscured over and over and over again by politicians and so called news reporters.

    Put another way, a “proceeding” cannot become a “proceeding” until it begins. An impeachment “proceeding” actually become one — only after it has begun. Absent an impeachment vote, we have, in the present example, slap dash and tomfoolery.

    On “legislative purpose,” see below, which is from page 56, of Congressional Research Service, report titled: “Congress’s Contempt Power and the Enforcement of Congressional Subpoenas: Law, History, Practice, and Procedure” (Updated May 12, 2017)

    This publication states:
    [[[Legislative Purpose
    A committee’s investigation must have a legislative purpose or be conducted pursuant to some other constitutional power of the Congress, such as the authority of each House to discipline its own Members, to judge the returns of their elections, and to conduct impeachment proceedings]]]

    And by the way, you can expect Congress to argue this is a legislative function, using Supreme Court Precedent from Wilkinson v. United States, 365 U.S. 399 (1961).

    This decision concludes as follows:

    [[[The Subcommittee’s legitimate legislative interest was not the activity in which petitioner might have been engaged at the time, but in the manipulation and infiltration of activities and organizations by persons advocating the overthrow of the Government.]]]

    In other words, Treason.

    Just in case anyone is really wondering why the Christopher Steele/Obama/Mueller/Clapper/Brennan/Biden/Clinton/Simpson/Jacoby/Blumenthal/Yates/Rosenstein/McCabe/Comey/McCarthy DOSSIER just won’t go away. . . .

    https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/365/399/

    -30-

    Liked by 4 people

    • DiodeBill says:

      Arze, very informative, thank you!

      Like

    • zimbalistjunior says:

      thanks Arze.
      there are two issues on the phone log
      1) the legality of subpoenaing the records
      2) the legality of publishing the results of the subpoena in their report

      overarching both of these issues is the main, obvious, yet never remarked point:
      the phone records predate Biden’s announcement of candidacy.
      there is no possible impeachable offense pre biden announcement.
      therefore, the subpoena and the publishing of the results are illegal on their face.

      Like

      • Mr e-man says:

        And who will charge or bring a lawsuit against the Democrats who illegally did this? Who is standing up for us?

        Like

      • Justin Green says:

        If the article is correct, then Congress can subpoena the records. Whether that requires a legitimate legislative purpose could be an issue.

        I do agree that Biden was an issue being looked into before Biden announced, and therefore you can’t impeach Trump over it – at all. Otherwise, you can rob a bank, rape all the women in the lobby, burn down the bank, and exceed the speed limit fleeing the scene, and then announce your bid for President to avoid investigation.

        Like

  17. 6x47 says:

    I really, REALLY hope and pray the GOP wins back the House of Representatives in 2020, and as one of the first official acts EXPELS Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Roni says:

      That could only happen if Ronna/RNC have a plan in place to recruit and support viable candidates. I’m not seeing that. Their only goal seems to be fundraising off the impeachment.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Beau Geste says:

        Again, we can tell Ronna/RNC:
        1. “no money until the GOP wholeheartedly and effectively supports PDJT, and disposes of the impeachment coup.
        2. If ANY GOP congresscritter voteds to impeach or convict, we will not vote for ANY GOP candidate in 2020. If the coup against an elected President succeeds, the country is gone anyway – GOP candidates will not be rewarded for not supporting the President.

        In the meantime, make any donations to PDJT, who can distribute as appropriate.

        Liked by 1 person

  18. David Vicknair says:

    See the following article for an eye opening summary of just how easy it is for Congress to obtain your phone records, how the Supreme Court in 1979 brazenly ruled against our 4th Amendment rights, and how the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, passed in 1968 by Bush and a Republican Senate majority (yes, the Republicans!), offers scant protection. This needs to change! https://thefederalist.com/2019/12/06/the-feds-dont-need-to-tell-you-or-get-a-warrant-to-collect-your-emails-and-phone-records/

    Liked by 1 person

    • Zippy says:

      Thanks for that link. Bongino is rightfully going off about the Republic being threatened by the calls being released by AT&T, but that article reinforces my educated view that the Republic has been dead for a very long time, it’s just that they’ve lost all fear of making that so very obvious.

      Like

  19. Cynthia says:

    Man, sure are a lot of depressing posts today. Jeez. I’m going to go look at silly dog pics on ihasahotdog . . .

    Liked by 1 person

  20. OldParatrooper says:

    If the information the HPSCI presented came from a FISA warrant, the HPSCI likely has the phone call content in addition to the Call Data Records. AG Barr needs to determine whether a FISA warrant exists that would 2-hop to Rudy, Nunes, etc. And then determine how the CDR and/or content got to the HPSCI.

    Liked by 1 person

  21. Beau Geste says:

    In just a few days, we will know if IG horowitz is a deep state agent covering up a seditious coup, or an honest investigator. We will also soon know whether Judge Sullivan will punish DOJ behavior and discipline DOJ prosecuting counsel for threatening General Flynn and his family for purposes of political harassment, destroying and altering evidence, and withholding evidence.

    Because it is so easy from the rubber-stamp FISC, here’s hoping that PDJT and AG Barr have a FISA Warrant on IG Horowitz, pelosi, nadler, schiff, Judge Sullivan, and that the Senate has a “pen register” on them also.

    Also a subpoena for all tax returns of dem congresscritters for the past 10 years for comparison with bank accounts and money from abroad….(see if they oppose it)?

    Like

  22. John Rawls says:

    Parnas has said he remembers what was discussed with Nunes.
    Now Nunes looks dumb for not remembering.

    Liked by 1 person

  23. You KNOW the records are fake, because it is the result of Schiff casting about for “proof” (of anything, like his own competence as a human being), and everything he has tried is pure fake. He probably got them with CIA (and revenge-minded AT&T Democrat, in just the right position) help, and illegally. That should be a given, unless and until it is proved otherwise. HE HAS NO CREDIBILITY.

    And what is the point anyway? Phone calls only a few (or zero) seconds long? I visualize this latest farce as only appropriate for Alice in Wonderland.

    Like

  24. ATheoK says:

    “The question would then be how did the unmasked information in an active investigation that started in the FISC end up being sent to the House Intel Committee to be disclosed to the public?”

    A suggestion would be that a SDNY staffer or associated FBI agent hopped a shuttle flight from NYC to DC.

    Which brings up a curious question: Blasey-Ford had an FBI friend who supposedly worked with SDNY.
    In a recent Daily Caller article, they showed a picture of Lisa Page walking down a hallway with what looks to be Blasey-Ford’s friend in the center.

    For an FBI employee working with SDNY, her presence in Washington DC is disturbing on multiple fronts, not just her “helping” Lisa Page. If she is commuting back and forth from NYC, she makes a likely carrier for democrat corruption.

    Like

  25. RAC says:

    ” EXCLUSIVE: Shifty Schiff Obtained Rudy Giuliani’s Phone Records A Day After AG Barr and US Attorney Durham Traveled to Rome – What Was He After? ”
    http://www.hideoutnow.com/2019/12/exclusive-shifty-schiff-obtained-rudy.html

    Liked by 1 person

  26. mikeyboo says:

    This gambit is further proof Nunez is hitting them where it hurts.

    Like

  27. lftpm says:

    Sundance, you have extraordinary research skills and are a font of vital information and wisdom.

    Does Adam Schiff have the authority to file an application for a FISA warrant? This is normally the purview of the DOJ/FBI. The DOJ has the job of enforcing the law, which involves seeking court warrants to surveil/investigate people.

    Congress, which has the power to enact laws, impeach Executive and Judiciary elected officials and appointed officers, and declare war (and the Senate to approve Executive nominations and treaties), has the power to issue subpoenas, and contempt citations, and to make referrals to the DOJ for prosecutions, and to file court motions against non-compliars of its subpoenas, may not have the authority to file FISA warrants. If Ristvan or another lawyer could clarify on this, it would be appreciated.

    What I think happened is Schiff issued a congressional subpoena to AT&T for phone records, which may or may not have been valid, and then he was able to get someone in the NSA to provide names to the phone numbers involved.

    Whether Schiff had legal authority to get this info from NSA is not clear to me. The NSA is under DOD, which means it is under the President–i.e. it is an Executive division. There may be some arcane law that allows the Legislative Branch to issue lawful orders to the NSA, re searching and unmasking phone numbers, and if this is the case, it’s worth a story in its own right. i am dubious of this.I suspect Schiff took an unauthorized “shortcut”.

    Like

  28. Bob Guzzardi says:

    Isn’t Lev Parnas a USA citizen?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s