Impeachment by Public Opinion – Oh Noes: Adam Schiff’s Terribly, Horribly, Painfully Transparent Back-Tracking…

If you have liberal family members around for this weeks Thanksgiving feast and celebration it would be wise to understand the scale of their disappointment, even if they have yet to recognize it.  Perhaps the best course will be just smiling.

…”I want to discuss this with my constituents and colleagues before I make a final judgment on this,” Schiff said.

Amid diminishing public support for the impeachment fiasco; and with more Americans starting to realize the past two months were an abject lesson in political narrative building and legislative manipulation; HPSCI impeachment committee chairman Adam Schiff transmits a letter today to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler.

If Schiff were in the MMA venue this letter, describing the HPSCI report to the House Judiciary Committee (HJC), would be a double tap to the mat:

Well, there’s a slightly less than strong impeachment position: Impeachment by “inference”.. he says.  Previously Mueller and Weissmann attempted to prosecute President Trump, the fictitious horse-thief, for attempting to obstruct his hanging; now Schiff is inferring guilt because President Trump didn’t present alibis for his whereabouts when the fictitious horse wasn’t stolen…. Yup, it’s looking like a fail.

Schiff continues:

Wait,… President Trump has done terrible, horrible, dastardly stuff that the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, says makes President Donald J Trump an “imposter” in the office.  But now the assembly of the three committees need to figure out whether such imposter behavior is “compatible with the office of the presidency”?

See the obfuscation?

Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler and Lawfare are in “political extraction mode”.  That is, trying to walk backwards to the impeachment exit and only stepping into their prior footprints so that the left-wing nuts cannot identify their retreat.

You can read the Schiff letter to Nadler HERE.

Oh man, the Democrat base is going to go bananas if the House doesn’t have an impeachment vote…. and yet Pelosi could lose her gavel if the House has an impeachment vote that results in two foolish House Managers showing up to the Senate chamber with legally limp articles of impeachment.

This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Cold Anger, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2020, Impeachment, Legislation, media bias, Nancy Pelosi, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

341 Responses to Impeachment by Public Opinion – Oh Noes: Adam Schiff’s Terribly, Horribly, Painfully Transparent Back-Tracking…

  1. Tiffthis says:

    Schiff keeps saying “lawful subpoenas” were issued by the HPSCI, but weren’t they actually “conveyed subpoenas”? I just wanna make sure I got this right.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. We are forced to infer from Adam Schiff’s obstruction that the testimony of Eric Ciarmarella would tend to incriminate Schiff further since he would have encouraged –rather than blocked–the testimony of Ciaramella, if he believed somehow it would be helpful to him.

    Liked by 3 people

  3. William Dorritt says:

    Sedition and Seditious Conspiracy
    Schiff and his co-conspirators are involved in the Overthrow of the Elected Govt.
    The Conspirators have coordinated and worked with Foreign Govts, and Foreign Agents to overthrow the US govt bringing the additional charge of Treason
    CFR, NeoCons and all Globalist Organization Members must be registered as Foreign Agents, their passes taken away and required to use the front door at the CIA, FBI, State and DOJ. Same goes for all Dual Passports inc Govt Employees
    Sanctuary Cities is a Rebellion run by the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations, they must be prosecuted, and the Foundations liquidated and the assets distributed for their original stated purpose. Overthrow the Govt using FAKE VOTERS, Judge Roberts agrees.
    Given the total collapse of the Rule of Law in DC, the FBI, DOJ, CIA and State Dept actively and openly participating the Conspiracy
    The restoration of Republic lies through Nuremberg Courts and televised firing squads.
    § 2381. Treason
    § 2382. Misprision of treason
    § 2383. Rebellion or insurrection
    § 2384. Seditious conspiracy
    § 2385. Advocating overthrow of Government
    § 2386. Registration of certain organizations
    § 2387. Activities affecting armed forces generally
    § 2388. Activities affecting armed forces during war
    § 2389. Recruiting for service against United States
    § 2390. Enlistment to serve against United States
    [§ 2391. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330004(13), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2142]
    18 U.S. Code § 2384. Seditious conspiracy
    If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
    (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

    18 U.S. Code § 2385 – Advocating overthrow of Government
    Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or
    Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or
    Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—
    Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
    If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
    As used in this section, the terms “organizes” and “organize”, with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.
    (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 2, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 87–486, June 19, 1962, 76 Stat. 103; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

    Globalists and Dual Passports must be registered as Foreign Agents
    18 U.S. Code § 2384 – Seditious conspiracy
    18 U.S. Code § 2385 – Advocating overthrow of Government
    Smith Act
    Alien Registration Act, 1940
    H.R. 5138
    Public, No. 670, Chapter 439
    8 U.S. Code § 1304 – Forms for registration and fingerprinting
    8 U.S. Code § 1302 – Registration of aliens

    The Alien Registration Act of 1940, usually called the Smith Act
    adopted at 54 Statutes at Large 670-671 (1940)
    The Alien Registration Act of 1940, usually called the Smith Act because the anti-sedition section was authored by Representative Howard W. Smith of Virginia, was adopted at 54 Statutes at Large 670-671 (1940). The Act has been amended several times and can now be found at 18 U.S. Code § 2385 (2000).

    Liked by 3 people

  4. Pegon Zellschmidt says:

    It appears that the only Democrats to come out of this smiling are the Lawfare boys and their bank accounts, Mueller and Ukaine failure notwithstanding. Schiff may be protected from a primary in his district (D+23) by the fact that there are very few blacks (2%). His biggest fear, other than a tranny, would be a latino (25%) America hating whackjob stepping up to the plate. As for the smirky Rachel Maddow, how many times can her emotional and intellectually feeble audience be led astray before they shoot the messenger?

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Mr e-man says:

    “abject lesson in political narrative building and legislative manipulation”

    Boy, ain’t that the truth. The R’s had to hold onto their hats as they went over the rapids on that one.

    But it still continues.

    Liked by 2 people

  6. hokkoda says:

    Nadler is scheduling hearings to start on 12/4…so it looks like I’m right and they’re pressing forward despite the polls. As of today anyway. Two possibilities:

    1. Democrats hold truncated hearings and accept HPSCI reporting as definitive. They decide the evidence is overwhelming (that was ALWAYS the plan, the hearings were for show), time is of the essence because the election is next year and they must act to prevent Trump from getting “foreign interference” in the elections. Their decision does not have to be based in logic or the law…merely the VOTES they think they have. They cannot back down. They are committed at this point, and if they lose the House next year, so be it. Pelosi has made multiple very public declarations of absolute guilty…no hedging and no way out of that. Ditto the rest of the lunatics in her caucus. There’s no way they can call Trump a direct threat to the Republic and then say, “Oh, well, mulligan!”

    2. Democrats hold hearings in the HJC and decide to push this out well into 2020. That gives them time to try and win some court decisions, and try to “slow bleed” Trump during the election year. There will be “bombshells” all year long that are not bombshells…just more hysteria from the fake news media. But that doesn’t matter. All that matters is that voters are distracted from the awful Presidential candidates, and that the Democrat base shows up to vote in November. The downside risk to this is the (admittedly small) probability that Durham produces indictments that are meaty and that target the core team of Coup Part One conspirators. I think Democrats know that what the FBI/DOJ did will be papered over and they’re willing to lose a few pawns. So the odds of Coup Part One revealing that many of the same people are involved in Coup Part Two are pretty small.

    I’m still of a mind that 1. carries the day and that the Horowitz IG Report is a dud. I don’t see how Pelosi stares down the crazies in her caucus. They have lost their minds.

    Liked by 2 people

    • hokkoda says:

      Option 2 has the benefit of keeping a Permanent Impeachment Investigation open from now through 2024 which they will just use to delay, disrupt, degrade, destroy anything Trump tries to do. They can rely on the courts to keep their hopes alive. There will be a lot of pressure on SCOTUS to slap all of this down. The Constitution does not authorize Congress to hold open-ended “investigations” that have nothing to do with pending legislation and which single out individual citizens for persecution. Democrats will bring this mess to a speedy conclusion if SCOTUS starts slapping them down on appeal.

      But again, I think the Democrats have become so utterly unhinged that they’re going to press forward to impeachment. The polls aren’t going to swing enough to dissuade them. Now, if they start getting polling in BLUE districts that show BLUE Democrats in danger? Then they’ll go Option 2. But I haven’t seen anything yet that says they’re worried about non-Trump districts.

      Liked by 1 person

      • hokkoda says:

        Pelosi was willing to utterly destroy her caucus in 2010 to get Obamacare passed. This is, from a partisan perspective, a much more white-hot issue for her base than Obamacare was. Anybody who thinks she won’t just throw them under the bus, but back the bus up to make sure she didn’t miss any, just to get Trump “impeached” doesn’t know grasp how ruthless Pelosi is.

        Liked by 1 person

  7. ATheoK says:

    Separated into sentences, statements and claims. Bolding added to highlight words, claims.

    “We will catalog the instances of non-compliance with lawful subpoenas1 as part of our report to the Judiciary Committee, which will allow that Committee to consider whether an article of impeachment based on obstruction of Congress is warranted along with an article or articles based on this underlying conduct or other presidential misconduct2.”

    1) They are not legal subpoenas.
    2) N.B. They’ve reduced “Crimes and Misdemeanors” to presidential misconduct”.

    “Such obstruction was the basis of the third article of impeachment against President Richard Nixon.”

    “Further, we will be forced to infer from this obstruction3 that the testimony of these witnesses would tend to incriminate the President further4 since he would have encouraged—rather than blocked—the testimony of senior officials like Acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and former National Security Advisor Ambassador John Bolton, if he believed it would somehow be helpful to him.”
    3) Schiffy infers obstruction without an underlying crime without any act of obstruction.
    4) Schiffy claims that the “obstruction” is when President Trump refuses to acquiesce to a fraudulent unconstitutional pretense impeachment. i.e. No official Impeachment = No wasting my Administration’s time.

    “The fact that the President has uniformly instructed all executive branch agencies and senior officials to obstruct the investigation further demonstrates consciousness of guilt on the part of the President5.”

    5) This is where Schiffy relies heavily upon “inference”F1.

    “Even as we draft our report, we are open to the possibility that further evidence will come to light6, whether in the form of witnesses who provide testimony or documents that become available.”

    6) Schiffy and the other democrat hoodlums desperately hope that somebody will bring them real evidence, or at least better evidence than they have.

    FI: Legal definition of “Inference”:

    “A conclusion arrived at by logically drawing on known facts — as in, if A and B are true, then C is.”

    N.B. Schiffy’s whole charade was to set up a false algebra political equation; if A & B are correct, then C must be correct.
    A) is Schiffy, Nadler’s and Pelosi’s allegations
    B) is their seditious list of witnesses.
    C) is supposed to be that President Trump is a criminal.
    Only democrat allegations failed to identify any crime committed by President Trump. While their witnesses incriminated themselves and the organizations of FBI, State Department and Marines.

    …Marines are implicated because their senior officers have failed to address willful insubordination, mutiny, conduct unbecoming an officer, perjury, preferential aid to a foreign country over the USA.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s