Elise Stefanik and Steve Scalise Discuss Status of Partisan House Impeachment Process…

Representatives Elise Stefanik and Steve Scalise discuss the partisan effort to remove President Trump through a one-sided impeachment effort.


Within the interview Ms. Stefanik notes the outside money pouring in to her district in a concerted effort to remove her from office.  The link to support her IS HERE

Support Elise Stefanik Here

This entry was posted in 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Cold Anger, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Donald Trump, Election 2020, Heros, Impeachment, Legislation, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, propaganda, Ukraine, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Elise Stefanik and Steve Scalise Discuss Status of Partisan House Impeachment Process…

  1. mike diamond says:

    Elise,Stefanik,is a real American hero,and so is Steve Scalise,and Jim Jordan,and some others,schiff,needs to be fully investigated!

    Liked by 5 people

  2. DDCon says:

    I just donated to Ms. Stefanik.

    Liked by 12 people

  3. I just donated my buck o five. Feels good.

    Liked by 10 people

  4. Matthew LeBlanc says:

    Really shows you where we are as a nation. All she does is speak the facts and ask honest questions in defense of the constitution. I don’t even get she’s a big PDJT fan yet Hollywood is going after her to support her far left opponent.

    Liked by 10 people

  5. Mark L. says:

    She is an effective communicator.

    Liked by 5 people

  6. Daniel Fruth says:

    Everyone reading these blogs…PLEASE call the offices of the Republicans who went to war with Shifty and held the line for TRUTH, and let them know how much you appreciate their work.
    Nunes 202-225-2523
    Jordan 202-225-2676
    Scalise 202-225-3015
    Ratcliff 202-225-6673
    Stefanik 202-225-4611

    I have missed several, so please call them, they need our support.

    Liked by 6 people

  7. Thank you for Republican impeachment committees Doing a Great job and stand Together,

    Liked by 5 people

  8. snailmailtrucker says:

    Thanks Sundance for Providing the Link to Donate to Congresswoman Elise Stefanik’s site … https://secure.winred.com/EliseStefanik/fightschiff
    DONATE if you can…. I Just Did !

    Liked by 2 people

  9. Bendix says:

    Kellyanne’s husband wants us to support Elise’s opponent.
    Because of an obviously faked picture that he pretended to take seriously.
    Why was he even aware of the picture?
    Know what? If a young office holder made a crude gesture in a photo, that would not be the deciding factor in how I voted. Her brilliant questioning in defense of our American system of government and Rule Of Law would carry far more weight.

    Tedra Cobb wants to take her constituents’ Second Amendment freedom away. She won’t admit this publicly, she wants to gain office under false pretenses.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. qbtrue says:

    better make a #thankyou on twitter. all mailboxes are full sorry I dont really do twitter or I would


  11. Pa Hermit says:

    I’m still trying top wrap my head around how an impeachment can happen with only a fictional crime. You can’t just manufacture “made up” evidence and that’s enough to impeach! Where are the rules of order? For instance, how can Judge Roberts determine that a fine is unacceptable but a tax is? Is he not out of order? His job is to interpret the law not make/change it! I get that the swamp is deep, but rules are rules, no? Stepping on toes is not enough, a swift kick to the shins is needed to get them on their knees and their attention! Just what rule gives Justice Roberts the power to make law? Our Forefathers are spinning in their graves!

    Liked by 1 person

    • ristvan says:

      PH, please read CJ Roberts Obamacare opinion before opining. It has four parts, each masterful. Going from memory:
      1. Established ripeness (there was a jurisdictional argument made by Solicitor General that the case was not yet ripe for SCOTUS to decide).
      2. Ruled that If the uninsurance penalty was a fine, it would be unconstitutional.
      3. Ruled that since was implemented via IRS and form 1040, was a Constitutional tax under A1§8.1. This was the alternative argument made by the Solicitor General.
      4. Most important, ruled that withholding funds from states that did not ‘voluntarily’ implement the Medicaid expansion mandate was clear ‘punitive’ unconstitutional overreach. Set a big precedent about federal mandates to/on states. The ‘unconstitutional overreach’ limits based on part four have yet to be defined.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s