Afternoon Impeachment Session – Kurt Volker and Tim Morrison – 2:30pm Livestream…

This afternoon at 2:30pm ET, Kurt Volker, former U.S. special envoy to Ukraine and Timothy Morrison, special assistant to the president and senior director for Europe and Russia at the National Security Council will testify to the impeachment committee.

Fox News LivestreamFox Business LivestreamPBS Livestream Link

.

.

This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Election 2020, Impeachment, Legislation, Live Streaming, media bias, Nancy Pelosi, President Trump, propaganda, Ukraine, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

654 Responses to Afternoon Impeachment Session – Kurt Volker and Tim Morrison – 2:30pm Livestream…

  1. Katherine McCoun says:

    Welch – again with the talking points that it is wrong to withhold aid unless they investigate a political revival and insisting that President Trump asked for a Ukraine investigation. Saying President Trump ignored the talking points provided to him and made this political request to make a campaign related request.

    Saying that withdrawal from nw syria by President Trump was impulsive, unwise, etc. insert eye roll from me here

    Says the investigation help with Biden and Burisma was a “side deal”, personal, campaign related
    & that President Trump was acting above the law

    Liked by 2 people

  2. littleanniefannie says:

    Liked by 17 people

  3. topavalley says:

    Mr. Welch,
    “Presidents are not above the law.”
    Neither are Joe and Hunter Biden!!

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Patience says:

    Foolishly…. Sean Patrick Maloney should stop about investigating the Bidens.
    >There is all the more reason to do so –now.

    Liked by 3 people

  5. todayistheday99 says:

    What a total flop by the Schiff & Lawfare losers. They may be good and underhanded double dealing and backstabbing behind closed doors, but when the klieg lights turn on and the cameras start rolling they look like evil bastards and fools.

    Liked by 4 people

  6. Patience says:

    WOW…. Val Demings is really (just) wrong.
    >But, “it has been a long day”

    Like

  7. Who can honestly watch this crap? There comes a time when the Repubs should walkout.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Justin Green says:

      I’ve just assumed that a “quorum” for one of these hearings means a certain amount of Democrats present. Otherwise, I’d agree, Republicans shouldn’t dignify this sham.

      Liked by 1 person

  8. Maquis says:

    Ooh, Morrison was potentially involved in “locking down the transcript.”

    Like

  9. sunnyflower5 says:

    Liked by 14 people

  10. Katherine McCoun says:

    Congresswoman Demings (and therefore the DNC/Dems team) now trying to neutralize the going-around-the-chain-of-command talking point regarding Vindman going around his chain of command – not going to Morrison. Now saying Morrison himself did not go to his boss but when to legal first.
    Morrison trying to explain the difference but I don’t think he made himself clear why he went to legal, what his concerns were and how that he was not complaining but just wanting legal to do their job too and be brought in v. going around

    Like

  11. covfefe999 says:

    Egad, mention of McCain

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Dora says:

    “At No Time Was I Aware of – an Effort to Urge Ukraine to Investigate Vice President Biden” – Ambassador Volker RUINS Schiff’s Day at Tuesday Show Trial

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/at-no-time-was-i-aware-of-an-effort-to-urge-ukraine-to-investigate-vice-president-biden-ambassador-volker-ruins-schiffs-day-at-tuesday-show-trial/

    Liked by 2 people

  13. Patience says:

    Okay, Raja.
    Vindman compared to McCain???…. to insult President Trump.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. avi says:

    why isn’t Tucker on?

    Like

  15. fred55678 says:

    The Ghost of McCain li9ves on == stalijng the Halls of Congress,

    Liked by 1 person

  16. 1stgoblyn says:

    Ooooohhh ooohhh ooohhh I know, let’s impeach President Trump for mean tweets.

    Liked by 2 people

  17. Maquis says:

    Hey Volker, a Public Offense merits Public Criticism.
    Yavonovich denigrated our President, and the new Ukranian President, on foreign soil, she got off lightly.

    Like

  18. Katherine McCoun says:

    Now using Volker just to criticize President Trump, his management style, his statements toward Vindmen, Volker stating President Trump saying President Trump’s tweets “are in appropriate” as if that is objective fact v. subjective opinion by Volker. Criticizing President Trump for criticizing (“attacking”) McCain. Blech!

    Liked by 1 person

  19. I haven’t watched everything today, but I’m getting the feeling that democrats in general and Schiff in particular may be seeing that the path that this ‘inquiry” is taking will soon cross the path of some of the expected revelations attendant to the “imminently” impending Horowitz FISA Report.
    They NEVER wanted this much detail to come out.
    Whoever wrote this script for them is an idiot.

    Liked by 8 people

    • FPCHmom says:

      The script was written when they thought Vindman was able to surreptitiously alter the transcript of PDJT’s call to him making a demand so they could claim a quid-pro-quo.

      Luckily (for us), he was unable to do that, and then PDJT released the actual transcript. Imagine if the transcript had been altered unbeknownst to everyone and it supported their sick fantasy.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Jase says:

        Bingo. I’d lay good odds that the sleazy Vinman was supposed to alter the transcript so it closely matched Schiff’s parody. Then they could claim the real transcript was a fake.
        That is why Schiff went ahead and read it out – Vinman was given the same script but his access to the transcript was cut off by it being ‘mistakenly’ put in the super secret file.

        Liked by 2 people

    • Lester Smith says:

      Should be a disclaimer before each hearing. About schiff and his band of misfits. It should read We really are not lawyers we only play one on TV. Bunch of night court attorneys at best. What fools graduates of the acme school of law, damn Looney toons. Worst damn show on TV heard the networks are canceling the series thank god!

      Liked by 1 person

  20. Jason Ross says:

    Jeebus. POTUS tweeted that Yavanovitch basically sucked in Somalia. That’s it! The DEMs talk like he assailed her with f-bombs and called out her mom.

    Liked by 1 person

  21. covfefe999 says:

    Good wrap by Nunes.

    Liked by 3 people

  22. joeknuckles says:

    “The best way to ensure you are not investigated is to make sure you don’t do anything wrong”.

    Doesn’t that apply to Democrats?

    Liked by 1 person

  23. burnett044 says:

    and even now they kissing up to John McCain….amazing……..Volker loves him and Biden…I have no use for Volker….

    Liked by 2 people

  24. mauiis says:

    This is inexcusable.

    Liked by 1 person

  25. Patience says:

    Schiff ends today’s ‘As The Story Turns’; otherwise known as the Schiff-show,
    with his continued revised meaningS of what has actually taken place and what has been said.

    >His eyes are bulging as he tells more stories. What a sickness!

    Liked by 2 people

  26. bullnuke says:

    Schiff has lost his shit. Looks like a nut job and in need of an intervention.

    Liked by 5 people

  27. Maquis says:

    So now Schitt claims that Biden’s extortion was a legitimate US policy objective, by definition set by Zero himself.

    Liked by 2 people

  28. mauiis says:

    He’s losing it.

    And he’ll get a standing ovation.

    Like

  29. avi says:

    why is this Schiffshow preempting Tucker?

    Like

  30. jeans2nd says:

    Schitt is playing his Shakespeare role now.

    No wonder Hollywood threw Schitt out and sent him to D.C.

    Liked by 1 person

  31. todayistheday99 says:

    Pencil neck is sticking his neck out again. I can’t imagine how anyone could possibly like Shifty. If Shifty was president I would have case zero of SDS.

    Like

  32. bullnuke says:

    For the love of God, please someone yell the whistleblower’s name.

    Liked by 2 people

  33. Katherine McCoun says:

    Schiff has a very odd way of speaking, doesn’t he? What accent is that?

    Liked by 2 people

  34. Patience says:

    Lee Zeldin speaking to reporters is killing it

    Liked by 3 people

  35. Cam Heck says:

    By Shitt’s own Logic, Obama needs to be impeached- overseeing an attempt to prevent Trump’s election in order to preserve his legacy. WHY don’t the republicans bring this up?

    Liked by 2 people

  36. I’m old enough to remember when they impeached Clinton. I know that in the end he was impeached for perjury, but ultimately wasn’t convicted by the Senate. I lived overseas at the time and the whole thing made me sick to my stomach. Foreigners only thought he was being impeached for Monika Lewinsky. They didn’t get all the other crud. I felt strongly then, as I do now, that impeachment should only be used in such dire and extreme circumstances that our country’s security is seriously at hand. That the President has done something so terrible, so unforgivable, such as treason, or murder, or selling secrets to our enemies. I felt then, as I do now, that a sitting President should not be subjected to civil suits and be forced to be deposed. I never felt bad for Clinton the man, but I did feel bad for the Office and for our CIC to be dragged through the mud on the country’s dime.

    I felt strongly at that time, as I do not 100-fold, that the whole thing made our country look foolish, weak, at odds. I felt it undermined Clinton’s authority to the world. It likely also inspired him to make choices that he may not have normally made. I felt the time for civil litigation should have been before or after he served his term. It’s only a few years. He won election twice, and it wasn’t close. I couldn’t stand the guy, but even I felt what a bad precedent it was.

    This is even worse. 100 times worse.At least with Clinton, his own disgusting depraved ways got him where he was. Trump simply wants to save our country from the Deep State. Draining the Swamp is a difficult process for sure. But these disgusting Democrat haters and doing terrible disservice to our nation, as well as Ukraine. Without a “whistleblower” no one would have ever said a word because there was never any harm, never any foul. Without this sham, we might be able to work toward enacting legislation that would help improve our country, as well as other countries.

    To me, what these Democrats are doing is treasonous, as well as the Deep State swamp rats that are coming out to testify against our POTUS.

    Liked by 9 people

    • tucker7518 says:

      I didn’t like Bill Clinton either, but after that long drawn out investigation, I started defending him. I was happy when he wasn’t removed from office.

      Like

  37. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 4 people

  38. cheering4america says:

    Sorry, I have not watched this travesty, both because of a lack of time and because I know it would disgust me to listen to the left’s continued lies and insinuations.

    So I have to ask: Has IG Atkinson testified? Has anyone asked him about the impetus for the change allowing a person WITHOUT first hand knowledge? Did he make the change? Did anyone ask him to do so, and if so, who was it?

    Has he been asked how it is that a complaint about our EXECUTIVE came through him as the Intelligence Community IG? How does he reconcile that?

    Liked by 2 people

  39. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 2 people

  40. Troublemaker10 says:

    Like

  41. stobberdobber says:

    Did anyone else catch the name of the second person that Schiff said testified that the Ukrainians had been advised of the hold on the aid soon after it was placed? The first was a MZ. Croft.
    As an aside I thought no one was allowed to ask questions of witnesses whose depositions were not already publicly released and the Republicans can’t ask questions about anything not talked about by the dems as rebuttal.. Schiff has done it togay and Krishnamoorthi too. He was asking questions about conversations between Sondland and POTUS

    Like

  42. islandpalmtrees says:

    Will Hurd thinks whistle-blower should be protected. Here we go again( Hurd), yet another CIA agent supports another CIA agent (Eric) who is supported by yet another CIA agent (Vindman).


    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/ciaramella-vindman.jpg.

    http://news.yahoo.com/fbi-seeks-interview-with-cia-whistleblower-121637359.html

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s