President Trump Signs Executive Order – With Mini Press Conference in Oval Office….

Earlier today President Trump signed an Executive order establishing a White House council on eliminating regulatory barriers to affordable housing [Details Here]. After explaining the XO President Trump answered questions from the pool:

[Video and Transcript]

[Details on the Executive Order Here] – [Background Call Here]

[Transcript] – 2:07 P.M. EDT – THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. Appreciate you being here. I’d like to take a few moments to describe what we’re doing on numerous fronts, but we’re going to take a major step in our historic regulatory reduction campaign.

Today, we begin a bold new initiative to bring down the cost of housing for American families. So important.

In a few moments, I will sign an executive order launching the White House Council on Eliminating Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Housing.

I’m grateful to be joined by the chair of this new Council, Secretary Ben Carson. We’re also pleased to have with us Senators Tim Scott and Martha McSally. And here with us are Clyde from Congress — Clyde Holland; Greg Ugalde; Bonnie Roberts-Burke; Pastor Darryl Scott; and — you’re not a congressman yet, Pastor, but you could be if you wanted to, I can tell. Would you like to run for Congress? Because you’d win pretty easily, I think.

PASTOR SCOTT: A government job? I don’t know. (Laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT: But thank you for being here, Pastor.

PASTOR SCOTT: Thank you.

THE PRESIDENT: Kareem Lanier. All the people who really care so much about affordable housing — what it means and how important it is for our country.

Overregulation of housing and housing market is a primary cause of the rising housing costs across our country. Nationwide, it’s estimated that the regulations account for more than 25 percent of the cost of a new home. Think of that. So, regulation and unnecessary regulation is 25 percent the cost of a new home.

As a result, the supply of affordable housing cannot keep up with the demand. Today, over 37 million American households have to spend more than 30 percent of their income on housing.

So, what I’d like to do is ask Ben Carson, who’s really devoted a lot of his time and effort on this tremendous overregulation problem — I’d like to have Ben Carson, Secretary, to say a few words. Ben?

SECRETARY CARSON: My pleasure. Well, thank you, Mr. President. And thank you for your continued commitment to the people of America.

Today, I’m privileged to be here for the creation of the White House Council on Eliminating Barriers to Affordable Housing, which I have the great honor to chair.

The Council, which consists of members across eight federal agencies, will lead federal efforts to engage with state, local, and tribal leaders across the country to the remove obstacles that impede the production of more affordable homes, namely the enormous price tag of burdensome government regulations.

The President has given us a mission to break down barriers and to clear the path for the millions of Americans to pursue their American Dream. It’s a mission we proudly and enthusiastically accept.

As the President just said, more than 25 percent of the cost of a new home is the direct result of federal, state, and local regulations. And sometimes, the price tag is much higher than that.

President Trump’s decades of experience as a world-renowned builder and developer gives this administration’s leadership a unique set of insights when confronting the challenges of developing more housing.

Today’s announcement recognizes the need for federal policies to serve Americans of all income levels, including working-class Americans — like teachers, and nurses, and auto-mechanics, construction workers, policemen, firemen — whose struggles are sometimes forgotten.

And I would also like to thank President Trump and the leadership of this administration, many of whom are here today, for once again fulfilling that great promise that the forgotten men and women of America will be forgotten no longer.

I look forward to working alongside my fellow councilmembers in the months ahead as we use these efforts to continue to build the pillars of prosperity that support all the men and women of this country in their quest for that portion of the American Dream that includes a home. The home is the foundation of the community, which is the foundation of the nation. And we can do this if we all work together. Thank you.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. That’s very nice.

How about Tim Scott? Where’s Tim?


THE PRESIDENT: Tim, do you want to say a few words, please?

SENATOR SCOTT: Mr. President, thank you for this executive order. There’s no doubt that a regulatory reset that is responsible will help more Americans who are credit-worthy achieve their goal, their aspiration, of having a part, a share, in this nation.

The American Dream so often is seen through the prism of homeownership. This executive order will accelerate the path of responsible homeownership and is proof positive that your conscientious, compassionate, conservative leadership is undeniably focused on the most vulnerable folks of our economic chain.

THE PRESIDENT: Very nice. Did you read that?


MS. ROBERTS-BURKE: That was right off the top of his head.

THE PRESIDENT: Good. That was very good. Thank you, Tim.



SENATOR MCSALLY: President Trump, thank you so much for this executive order. In the first 90 days as a senator in Arizona, I visited all 15 counties. We’re a very diverse state and our economy is growing, but a top theme is affordable housing.

And there are many barriers to that, and so this group, coming together to cut across those barriers — federal, state, and local — to provide more opportunities at lower cost so everybody can meet their full potential, is really important for my constituents. And so I’m grateful for this administration.

THE PRESIDENT: Good. Thank you, Martha. Great job.

Pastor Scott.

PASTOR SCOTT: Mr. President, during the 2016 campaign, you stated that you would implement national policy to revitalize the urban communities of this great country and — well, all the communities, urban and rural — and I think is just a part — this dovetails on the Opportunity Zones and the things that are being done in those designated areas. And this makes it — makes the revitalization process that much more obtainable. So we thank you for it.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. And thank you for bringing up the word “Opportunity Zones” — the words — because Tim Scott had so much to do with that. And it’s far beyond our expectation. That’s a little different than what we’re talking about today, but while you bring up that term — it’s a beautiful term. Tim Scott came to see me a little while ago, toward the beginning, but not that long ago —


THE PRESIDENT: And, Tim, I don’t mind if you say just a couple of things about what’s happened, because the Opportunity Zones have just taken off in this country.

SENATOR SCOTT: Yes, sir. Mr. President, because of your leadership, frankly, we have seen incredible growth in the Opportunity Zones.

Here’s just a couple of examples. I think it’s important for us to remember that, in Opportunity Zones, the average person is living in a place where the poverty rate is at 31 percent. Nationally, our poverty rate is at 12.5 percent. Because of your legislation that you signed, sir, we’ve seen an 8 percent increase in wages within the zones. We’ve seen a 20 percent increase in property values in the zones.

That’s really important for two reasons. Number one, over 50 percent of the folks in the zones own their property. So that means that we’re seeing net worth increase because of the Opportunity Zone legislation. So that’s really important.

Number two, the fact of the matter is, when you put more pressure on those zones, you attract more resources in it.

And from the Treasury’s perspective, we could see upwards of more than $50 billion descending upon these zones, creating opportunities and workforce housing that we’re talking about today. And that is an important part of the equation.

And that is brought to us by your leadership and your willingness to have the conversation about moving people in distressed communities forward. Thank you for saying yes to Opportunity Zone legislation.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. Thank you, Tim. You’ve been a great — you’ve been a great help. He’s been a great help. (Applause.)

Would anybody like to say something? And then we’ll sign up. Anybody? Would you like to say something?



MR. HOLLAND: Clyde Holland. With respect to the National Multi Housing Council and Up for Growth, two areas we’ve been struggling to produce: apartments and the most affordable housing in America. We can’t thank you enough, Mr. President —


MR. HOLLAND: — for this help.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. I appreciate it, Clyde.

Yes, please.

MR. LANIER: Mr. President, thank you for this. And I’d like to thank you as well, Dr. Carson, for your leadership as well.

Coming from the inner city, coming from urban America, living within the confines of what it takes on the day-to-day, we don’t care about the costs and the regu- — we need the housing. And so it’s good that we have these barriers removed so that we can actually get access to these things.

When you’re a kid living in urban America, you don’t care who your President is, who your governor is, who your mayor is. You care about the things that are practical to you. And the things that really are practical is where am I going to lay my head at tonight and what am I going to eat when I get there.

And these things help more people in urban America get access to housing that is so needed. And so we thank you tremendously.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. I appreciate it.

MS. ROBERTS-BURKE: And I’d like to say, from the National Association of Realtors, and as a realtor, that I thank you very, very much. The American Dream is homeownership. We have the lowest percentage of homeownership that we’ve had in many, many years. And I think this is going to go a long way to increase that.

And thank you.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much.


MR. UGALDE: Greg Ugalde. On behalf of the homebuilders, Mr. President, we are strongly behind this effort. The regulatory framework throughout the country needs to be focused on. It will help us with workforce development as well. And I think that this is tremendous. And we thank you for this.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. I appreciate it.

SECRETARY CARSON: I just want to add one other thing.

THE PRESIDENT: Yes, please, Ben.

SECRETARY CARSON: You know, the average net worth of a renter is $5,000. The average net worth of a homeowner is $200,000. That’s a 40-fold difference. And we talked so much about the income gap, the wealth gap in this country. A lot of it has to do with homeownership. And that’s why this is so important. But it has to be done the right way. It wasn’t done the right way, you know, a decade or more ago, and it led to a crisis.

So we have to learn from those situations, do it the right way. And it’s really about recognizing that our people are our most important resource. And we need to develop it, and the best place to develop those resources is a solid home environment.

THE PRESIDENT: That’s great, Ben. Thank you. (Applause.)

MS. ROLLINS: One quick thing, Mr. President: When you combine this with your criminal justice reform efforts; with the lowest unemployment because of your tax cuts and regulatory reform effort; with your fight for school choice so children have a real opportunity for an education; to Ivanka and your workforce– the Pledge to the American worker; all of that combined lifts all boats, but it lifts those at the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder the most. And that’s because of your leadership.

So we’re just so grateful to you.


MS. ROLLINS: Thank you.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you for bringing up criminal justice reform. We got it passed. Nobody else could have gotten it passed. And we’re very proud of that. A lot of people worked very hard on that. And I see it’s a big part of the debates. And now they’re all saying, “It got passed, and it got passed by a Republican named Trump.” (Laughter.) And the Democrats don’t know quite how to handle that one.

But we did criminal justice reform — very comprehensive, also. And there were a lot of people — and the incredible thing about it was we had conservatives — very, very conservatives — and we had very, very liberal people supporting it. We had everybody. We had a great bipartisan group. And we had some people opposed to it, too. But we had, for the most part, tremendous support.

So thank you very much.

Larry Kudlow, do you want to just give a moment about how well our economy is doing? Because it looks like June could be one of the best months in the history of the stock market for June — for that month.

MR. KUDLOW: I know. It’s most extraordinary. And it’s a terrific sign about the future economy. Really a good sign. We had our correction in the spring; now we’ve gotten it back and then some.

And numbers coming out — production went way up in May. Consumer spending, retail sales, way up in May. We’re going to have a better Q2 than people initially thought. I think we’re on track for 3 percent economic growth or better. And to remind (inaudible): low tax rates, deregulation, opening up energy, trade reform, initiatives like this from Secretary Ben and others. This is what it takes. We’re opening doors for the whole — every nook and cranny of this economy is coming alive, sir.


MR. KUDLOW: If we stay on track with your policies, it’s going to be great news for America.

THE PRESIDENT: Number one in the world, too. If you look at Europe, they’re having difficulty. If you look at China and various parts of the world — Asia, other places — we’re beating everybody. And we’re going to keep it that way.

So I’m going to sign this. And, Ben, congratulations.


THE PRESIDENT: You’ve been working on this for a long time. It’s a great thing. Thank you very much. (Applause.)

(The executive order is signed.)

(The President distributes pens to the participants.) Spread these around folks. Spread them around. (Laughter.) I don’t like signing one letter at a time. Doesn’t look too good — the end result.

Q Mr. President, are you personally concerned — Mr. President —

THE PRESIDENT: Wait until you hear this beauty.

Q Are you personally concerned about the conditions at these border facilities, where there are some reports —

THE PRESIDENT: Yes, I am. I’m very concerned. And they’re much better than they were under President Obama, by far. And we’re trying to get the Democrats to agree to really give us some humanitarian aid — humanitarian money. And that is a very fair question, and I appreciate that question.

But I’m very concerned. It’s in much better shape than it ever was. A lot of these young children come from places that you don’t even want to know about. The way they’ve lived — the way they’ve been — the way — the poverty that they grew up in.

But, with that, if we can get this bill signed, we’ll be able to do it. We have — you know, the Democrats don’t want to sign anything. And now, I think they’re going to probably sign this. From what I understand it’s — I call it “humanitarian aid.” This isn’t even about border.

At the same time, you see the numbers are way, way down. Mexico has been really helping us a lot. They have very strong immigration laws. They are moving 15,000 people or 16,000 people to our southern border. And they moved 16,000 troops to their southern border, which is pretty incredible.

And a lot of signs are coming out where the cartels and all of the bad folks — the “coyotes,” as they call them, and all of the bad people that are bringing young children and taking advantage horribly — it’s a form of slavery. It’s horrible what they are doing to young children. You understand. You’ve reported on it. A lot of that is stopping now because of what we’re doing and because of what’s happening on the border.

So I just want to thank Mexico. They’ve really done a great job. We appreciate what they’re doing. And hopefully, they can keep it up because it’s very important. They have very, very — Mexico has very, very powerful immigration laws. They can do things. Our laws are so bad.

What we would like to do — and I’ll do it right now officially, is ask the Democrats to give us help on asylum, help on all of the loopholes — the horrible loopholes that signed in over a period of years that don’t allow us to do what we should be able to do. We need the votes of Democrats.

And I think, very importantly, you know, because our economy — you heard Larry Kudlow — because our economy is so strong — it could be the strongest in the history of our country — people want to flow up to the United States. But you just can’t do it that way. You have to do it legally. But they’re — you have these massive numbers of people trying to get into the United States because of the economy, because we’ve done so good.

But that’s one of the problems. We’re doing well. Everybody wants to come in. Ten years ago, five years ago, four years ago, they didn’t want to come in. Today, they want to come in. But we can’t let that happen so we’re doing very, very — (inaudible).

And as far as the wall is concerned, the wall is heavily under construction. The Army Corps of Engineers is doing a great job. We’re doing a lot of wall right now and we expect to have 400 miles built by the end of next year. That’s a lot. And we’re building them in the right places. We’re building — we’re picking areas where we need it the most and it’s having a tremendous effect.

Q Did you ask your Customs and Border Protection head, John Sanders, to resign? Do you know why he is leaving his post?

THE PRESIDENT: No. I know there was going to be a change there. I’ve made changes — very good changes. We have — we’re moving some people around into different locations. The game has changed a lot because of what Mexico is doing. We’re able to do things that we wouldn’t have been able to do before.

The problem with our Border Patrol, who are phenomenal people, but they’re not allowed — because our laws are so bad with catch-and-release and all of the different things including chain migration, the visa lottery — the laws are so bad and the asylum rules and laws are so bad that our Border Patrol people, who are so incredible, aren’t allowed to do their jobs.

So because Mexico is, now, for the first time in 50 years, helping us — and we really appreciate it — we’re able to make certain changes that we wouldn’t have been able to make before.

Steve, did you have a question?

Q You had a back-and-forth with the leader of Iran this morning via tweet. What message did you send to him with your tweets this morning?

THE PRESIDENT: There is no message. You know, I’ll tell you what the message is: When they’re ready, they’ll have to let us know. When they’re ready, they’ll let us know. Very simple.

Q Ready to negotiate, you mean?

THE PRESIDENT: Ready to do whatever. Doesn’t make any difference. Whatever they want to do, I’m ready. Okay?

Q On the Middle East, Jared Kushner is in Bahrain right now —


Q — releasing this economic component of your Middle East Peace Plan without the Israelis or Palestinian officials attending. So what’s your strategy going forward when there’s no buy-in from the parties in (inaudible)?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, we want to get support. And we have to get economic support because the Palestinians don’t have money. And we have to help the Palestinians with some money because they don’t have it. And one of the groups that you get are some of those countries in the Middle East that do have money.

So, they’re going to play a role in the peace plan and we’ll see what happens. We had a little bit of setback when the election from — in Israel, as you know, I guess the result is somewhat mixed because now they’re going to do it again. That’s another do-over, unfortunately, and — but we’ll see what happens. I mean, we’ll see what happens with that election, but it’s an early process, but we expect other people to help out.

Because, again, there’s no money. And some people don’t have money. And if they don’t have money, it’s going to be very hard. We want people to be able to live and live well.

Q Taking it back to the CBP — so does that mean you did not ask Sanders to resign?

THE PRESIDENT: I didn’t speak to him. I don’t think I’ve ever spoken to him, actually. No, we have some very good people running it. And you know, I don’t know anything about it. I hear he’s a very good man. I hear he’s a good person. I don’t know him. I don’t think I ever spoke to him.

Q And can you tell us about your decision to choose Stephanie Grisham as your new Press Secretary?

THE PRESIDENT: So Stephanie has been with me from the beginning, as most of you know. And then, over the last couple of years, she’s worked for the First Lady. Done a fantastic job. The First Lady loves her. I think she’s been, you know, just incredible. She’s very talented.

And I asked so many people, “Who do you like?” A lot of people wanted the job. You know, a lot of people wanted to do it. And I’d ask people, “Who do you like?” And so many people said, “Stephanie.” And she’s here. She knows everybody. She actually gets along with the media very well, as you know. A lot of the folks in the media like her very much. And I think she’s going to be fantastic. I think she’s going to do a great job.

So I offered her the job this morning and she accepted. And the First Lady is very happy for her. It’s a big job. It’s a very big job, but we think Stephanie is going to do a fantastic job. And Hogan is going to be with her. Hogan was one of the people that recommended her. Here’s Hogan. He recommended her very strongly. I said, “Hogan, who do you think?” He said, “Stephanie Grisham.” So —

Q Do you have an exit strategy for Iran if war does break out? How do you —


Q Do you have an exit strategy for Iran if war does break out?

THE PRESIDENT: You’re not going to need an exit strategy. I don’t need exit strategies.

Q Mr. President, could you tell us about your letter to Chairman Kim?

THE PRESIDENT: Just a nice letter back and forth. He wrote me a beautiful on my birthday. It was my birthday, as you know, last week. He wrote me a beautiful letter. I thought it was very nice. And just two friendly letters. We get along very well.

Q No mention of another meeting?

THE PRESIDENT: Maybe there was. But we — you know, at some point, we’ll do that. Getting along very well. He’s not doing nuclear testing. When I took over, as you know — when I became President, they were testing — previous to that, they were testing so much and they were doing ballistic tests and nuclear tests. And we didn’t have all our prisoners back. We had a whole lot of things that were going wrong.

Now we have our hostages back, our prisoners back. They came back. We’ve had, as you know, the remains of the heroes — our great heroes from many years ago. That’s coming back, and coming back as they find them. And as they find the sites and graves, they’re sending them back.

The relationship is a far different relationship than it was during the Obama years, where — you were going to end up with a war. You were going to end up with a war in North Korea, that I can tell you. I’ll tell that to Tim Scott. Maybe you haven’t heard that, Tim. You understand.

You were going to end up — I tell you what, you were going to end up in a war in North Korea, and — if it kept going the way it was going, if you had that group continuing onward.

As far as Iran is concerned, the deal was a horrible deal. It was no good. It was no good. It ended in a very short period of time. We’re dealing about countries. It ended in a very short period of time. They would have had a clear path to a nuclear weapon. We’re not going to allow that to happen. You can’t do it.

And I’m all for Iran. I have so many people — Iranian friends. I come from New York. I have tremendous numbers of Iranian friends. They’re great people. They’re from Iran. They’re wonderful people. It’s too bad this is happening. They’re living badly right now. Their country is not doing well, economically, at all. That can be changed very quickly, very easily. But they have to get rid of the hostility from the leadership. And the leadership — I hope they stay. I hope they do a great job. But they should talk to us decently.

We’re all for them. We want it to be done properly. But the deal that was done by President Obama — $150 billion for nothing. He used the money for terror. They gave the money out to terrorists.

If you remember, John Kerry — they asked him that question: “Do you know the money is going to be used for terror?” He said, “Yes.” Essentially, he said at least some of it is going to be used — I mean, he knew about it. He actually said that some of the money may be used for terror. What kind of a deal is that?

Then they gave him $1.8 billion in cash — cash. Planeloads of cash. What kind of a deal is that?

And the biggest problem is they had bad testing. You weren’t able to see many of the sites. You saw that, Tim.


THE PRESIDENT: You couldn’t go into the most important sites to test, to see. They were probably making this stuff for a long time. But with $150 billion going to them, they were doing very well. And $1.8 billion in cash. And you had no real right of testing. You couldn’t test properly.

And most importantly, the agreement ends in a very short period of time. So they had a path to nuclear weapons. We cannot allow Iran to have a path to nuclear weapons.

And, by the way, we have tremendous support, tremendous support. And people were very happy with what I did the other day by not doing something, okay? But we had tremendous and we have tremendous support. Nobody wants to see Iran have nuclear weapons.

Thank you very much everybody. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you very much.

Q Do you think they understood the message you were sending them last week? You decided not to strike —

THE PRESIDENT: I hope they understood the message. I decided not to strike. They shot down unmanned — as you know, an unmanned drone.

Q But do you think they take your threats seriously now, Mr. President?

THE PRESIDENT: I think everybody does. I think you do, too. Goodbye. (Laughter.)

END 2:33 P.M. EDT

This entry was posted in Big Government, Dem Hypocrisy, Donald Trump, Economy, Legislation, media bias, President Trump, Press Secretary - Trump, Uncategorized, US Treasury, USA. Bookmark the permalink.

42 Responses to President Trump Signs Executive Order – With Mini Press Conference in Oval Office….

  1. MM says:

    God Bless PDJT he’s doing all he can to help the American people..
    He truly cares!
    I’m sick of watching people demonize this President…

    Liked by 23 people

    • Carrie2 says:

      MM, you are not alone in thanking a President that is bringing back more of the America I grew up with. I thank God every day for him and that Trump be allowed another term to get all done.

      Liked by 4 people

  2. bluecat57 says:

    Racist. Only minorities need affordable housing and providing it will make them feel bad.

    Liked by 1 person

    • MVW says:

      “Racist. Only minorities need affordable housing and providing it will make them feel bad.”

      Is that sarcasm? If so, LOL! That executive order Trump was signing was about reducing regulations that have needlessly driven up the price of homes. Also the work being done is to increase home ownership **Responsibly** unlike the way it has been done before by approving loans even if the buyers could not afford the loans.

      Liked by 6 people

  3. bessie2003 says:

    This is so cool!

    Congress passes laws and leaves the implementation of them, through agency regulations, to the different agencies of the government – which are under the Executive Branch.

    There was just a Supreme Court case where the Justices had to decide whether or not regulations written and implemented by these Executive Branch agencies are crossing a line, implementing powers that only Congress can say how they should be implemented – that’s my non-lawyer understanding of the gist of the matter so am open to clarification on this layman’s understanding.

    One way or another the deep state gets smaller, either Congress starts taking responsibility for implementation of the laws they pass (keeping them too busy for foreign junkets) or the President can continue to just get rid of one regulation after another, until one day, there will be no need for huge employee base in the different agencies, because they will have nothing to do!

    Very Stage Genius strikes again 🙂

    Liked by 11 people

  4. tea for all says:

    The Forgotten Man is no longer forgotten
    The American Dream, home ownership is just a piece of that Dream
    Thank You President Trump

    Liked by 8 people

  5. I like when he said, I don’t do exit strategies….made me laugh.

    Liked by 10 people

  6. I’m hoping this Executive Order has it goals in Storm Ravaged areas, or Similar areas, Where Affordable Housing is nearly Obtainable..
    Rents here in SENC, have Doubled & Tripled in a few short Months, since last Sept..

    Yes, I sincerely hope this EO helps ME in the very near future. Though I doubt it..
    I’ve partly not been posting because, of Our impending Eviction..
    Our home being demolished for a parking lot..
    (The Big Yellow Bus)

    Liked by 5 people

  7. Truthfilter says:

    Can someone give me an example of a regulation that might be eliminated bc of this executive order or this council? I have bought 2 homes in my lifetime. I just don’t remember a lot of regulatory expenses but this order claims that regulations can add up to 25-40% of a purchase price for a home. I remember having to get termite inspections and appraisals for the bank to approve the loans but both of these seem necessary.


    • bessie2003 says:

      Underneath the caption to the above photograph you should be able to click on the link that says “Details on the Executive Order here” which should take you to that information.


    • Sentient says:

      HUD Secretary Ben Carson was here in Minneapolis on Tuesday and praised the City’s effort to “up-zone” most of the city. That means loosening the zooming requirements to allow higher density. The plan would allow a structure of up to 3 units (a tri-plex) to be build on any (formerly) single family-zoned lot. It would also allow (on arterial streets and adjacent-to-arterial streets) the building of up to 4 story multifamily structures (whether apartments or condos) in areas that had previously been single family homes. It’s caused a bit of a ruckus in the nicer single family areas around the lakes (like where idiot officer Mohammed Noor shot Justine Damond in her pajamas I’m not sure that such “up-zooming” is what the president has in mind. It’s all the rage in places like Seattle where the idea is to get more people into the central cities so they can be herded onto trains.


      • Sentient says:

        I don’t mean to bash “up-zoning” too much. The other extreme is cities like Portland, OR that have been notorious in prohibiting construction.


      • CM-TX says:

        Thanks, your last sentence made me LOL!
        Although it’s not at all a funny situation… I try to find some humor in most things (admittedly dark at times). It’s all you can do when the reality of so much– is too darn depressing! 😏


      • Judith says:

        I know exactly what you are referring to @Sentient. The comments here seem very optimistic but, from my experience, HUD is a slush fund for greedy COC globalists and trade unions. They use HUD funds to create their sanctuary cities. Is that what HUD is talking about here?

        In the past, “Affordable” HUD housing has meant gutting the existing residential zoning regs to slap up high-density, section 8 tenements. They build them on the cheap, with wood trusses and no firewalls, and with no thought whatsoever to the pressure on surrounding neighborhoods or infrastructure.

        Affordable housing is HUD’s version of open borders. In fact, many of their high density developments have become sanctuary cities.

        “Workforce housing” is a buzzword for Agenda 21’s New World Order. Out with solid *red* residential family-zoned neighborhoods. In with *blue* transient laborers subsidized by beleaguered taxpayers.

        Please tell me I am wrong. I REALLY REALLY want to be wrong, but give me some specifics. Tim Scott touted “workforce housing” in the video, and that phrase, along with “next gen” and “sustainable” are UN Agenda 21’s New World Order buzzwords for herding us proles into high-density slums.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Truthfilter says:

        Ok -I know a little about zoning. Thanks for the example.

        We have a sugarcane field next to our neighborhood which was approved (zoned?) for Section 8 housing in 2015. The project is currently on hold because so many have complained. People who have built new homes in this area don’t want section 8 housing right in their backyards. None of us want it. We live in a developed rural area just outside a small town-45 minutes south of gNew Orleans. There are plenty of large abandoned places in town that can be used for this purpose.

        Frankly, I think it should be illegal to have ANY section 8 or other subsidized housing anywhere south of Lake Ponchartrain. The whole country has to foot the bill for the evacuations, the relocations, the clean-up and the rebuilding after storms and floods. 60% of the population of New Orleans was on government assistance in 2005 when Katrina hit and the levies broke. I hope someone on President Trump’s council will promote some common sense regulations about construction in disaster prone areas.

        Liked by 2 people

      • prenanny says:

        Government worker pension shortfall solution = higher density housing.
        In your example taxation would increase per lot by 66% – 100% without raising the percentage.
        Was there any mention of the parking problems that will now be created?

        Liked by 1 person

    • SMP Belltown says:

      I *think* that most of the regulations that this EO will address are factors in new-home construction. A quick web search turned up this link, which seems to be from the UK,but has a list which seems applicable to construction of houses, apartments and condos here in the States as well:

      And the article doesn’t even mention rainwater runoff, wetlands preservation or other eco concerns of the modern day.


    • prenanny says:

      Many regulations are hidden to the buyer unless they are involved in the construction.
      Plumbing and electrical specifics that can add up to multiple thousands of dollars per home. How much insulation is required, types of sockets etc.
      Building codes have become antithetical to freedom.

      What the tribal indians are doing on this committee I’ve no idea perhaps someone else can explain.


    • Marguerite says:

      For example, federal housing programs currently require proof of low income for housing programs: a significant administrative burden for a property manager. But for non-housing uses (like a summer food program) there can be less stringent requirements, a “presumed benefit” for low income people based on a judgement call that the program will only benefit low income funds. What if a housing program could ask HHS to verify that an applicant receives Medicaid? (I guess the applicant gives permission.) Bam, instead of keeping files on changes etc. in tenant income, once a year the property manager goes online and is able to verify eligibility without even dealing with the tenant. There’s a lot of complex recordkeeping involved when you layer different funding sources for affordable housing that could be streamlined.

      Liked by 1 person

  8. boomerbeth says:

    INCOHERENT Alcoholic Mule-liar will testify under subpoena 7-17

    from Jerry is kaNADELaaaaa….And SHIFTY shiftless .
    Will they refer him for perjury.?
    Who is going to hold back the questions of Biggs, Gaitz, Gomert Nadler & Radcliffe.
    Will they entrap the entrapment artist extraordinaire@?

    Liked by 2 people

  9. 335blues says:

    Just with his accomplishments thus far, Donald J. Trump is, IMO, one of the
    best, and most accomplished Presidents in the history of America.
    Can you imagine what he might accomplish in the next 6 years?!?
    I love America, I love our freedom, our Constitution, our Bill of Rights,
    and that We are one nation, under GOD, indivisible, with liberty
    and justice for all.
    Keep America Great!

    Liked by 10 people

  10. Sentient says:

    This wouldn’t help “affordability” per se, but I hope Dr. Carson & HUD will consider incenting homebuyers utilizing FHA loans to take out slightly shorter duration loans. A reduction in the cost of mortgage insurance for a 25 year loan versus a 30 year could be an incentive. The increase in payment is not great, but the more rapid principal reduction would: reduce HUD’s overall risk pool and help homeowners build up equity faster.


    • prenanny says:

      I am an advocate of the 30 year mortgage and paying it off early.
      Keeps your monthly expenses lower during tough times.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Judith says:

        Voluntarily paying down some additional principle every month *greatly* reduces the total amount owed at the end. Mortgages are front loaded (amortized) so that you’re mainly paying down interest, while the principle is barely touched, and that means more interest keeps on piling onto the principle. That is like digging a hole while sand just keeps collapsing it into itself.

        Americans always seem to scrounge up enough money to cover hefty cable bills, cell phones, designer sneakers and alcohol. There is no reason they can’t set aside a small amount each month to knock down that principle on their mortgage to reduce the interest owed.


      • Baby El says:

        Agree Nanny, its like getting interest on your savings equal to your mortgage rate plus, since its paid with after tax money.

        And, if tough times hit, you still only have to make only the 30yr payment amount. In good times, you can pay it off in 15 or less.

        Also makes a home very easy to sell when you don’t need to get absolute top dollar + more for a down payment on the next one.

        Highly recommend this method of savings in life.


  11. Paul B. says:

    I have never seen anything like what this president is doing for this country. He is hitting every aspect that he can with renewal. I’ve never seen a civil servant so dedicated and hard working. And so successful. He is good at what he does and he is getting better. Thank God for him, for such a time as this.

    Liked by 6 people

  12. Schmitty says:

    Housing Market ( etf: IYR ) peaked June 20 2019. Anticipating June 2021 Housing Price bottom (2 years of home prices softening)


  13. rashomon says:

    Ben Carson should ask Catherine Austin-Fitts, former under-secretary to HUD Sec’y Jack Kemp, to advise on this council as she has experience far beyond most with the meta data that could have made the agency work faster, cheaper and smarter than that Alphabet Soup Group has ever worked. Of course, that would have put some of the bureaucrats out of jobs, so….

    Liked by 2 people

  14. Perot Conservative says:

    Dr. Carson!


  15. The Devilbat says:

    Karl Marx wrote, “The first thing to understand about communism is that there is no such thing as private property.” Well screw you Karl. We like the idea of owning our own houses instead of sharing everything with a bunch of useless low life commies.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. jeans2nd says:

    Would that more people would pay attention to HUD Sec Dr Carson. What Dr Ben has been doing for the low-income housing problems is truly remarkable.

    No one notices Dr Ben except for the Daily Caller, Stuart Varney of Fox Biz, and Larry O’Conner of WMAL. Dr Ben has been working on the housing problems since he was confirmed, and has made amazing progress. Dr Ben has worked with nearly every other agency in gubmint to expand availability and affordability for low-income housing recipients, and to increase workforce incentives for welfare recipients.

    These are some of the houses Dr Ben showcased on the D.C. Mall a couple three weeks ago.
    These houses are hurricane certified, and one is actually on wheels, to be moved from site-to-site. And gubmint programs have been reworked to make certain the buyers of these homes will not lose them like in 2008.
    Please take a couple minutes for this vid. 5:39

    Liked by 1 person

  17. Haveaspine says:

    Only if Paul Ryan put a real effort in reforming our immigration law while we were the majority the living condition at the border would be much improved.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s