Sunday Talks: Connecticut Democrat Rep. Jim Himes -vs- Maria Bartiromo….

Suspicious cat sparks are flying as Maria Bartiromo questions Connecticut Democrat Rep. Jim Himes about the intents and purposes of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) in the upcoming investigative sessions.

HPSCI Chairman Adam Schiff is closely coordinating with Speaker Nancy Pelosi, White House Oversight Chairman Elijah Cummings and Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler on the pre-established impeachment road map.

Preliminary oversight subpoenas and witness testimony kicks-off immediately after the Superbowl with a February 7th hearing for Michael Cohen and Lanny Davis.

This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2020, FBI, IG Report FISA Abuse, Legislation, media bias, Nancy Pelosi, Occupy Type Moonbats, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Spygate, Spying, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

226 Responses to Sunday Talks: Connecticut Democrat Rep. Jim Himes -vs- Maria Bartiromo….

  1. G. Combs says:

    “Dossier not disproven”


    I can not ‘disprove’ little green men live on Pluto either! Or that Jim Himes is NOT a serial rapist of little children.

    Our laws are ‘PROVEN” especially when it comes to FISA applications since the accused is NOT ALLOWED TO DEFEND THEMSELVES!

    Sharyl Attkisson….
    Presentation of any such unverified material to the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court to justify a wiretap would appear to violate crucial procedural rules, called “Woods Procedures,” designed to protect U.S. citizens.

    There’s no dispute that at least some, if not a great deal, of information in the anti-Trump “Steele dossier” was unverified or false. Former FBI director James Comey testified as much himself before a Senate committee in June 2017. Comey repeatedly referred to “salacious” and “unverified” material in the dossier, which turned out to be paid political opposition research against Donald Trump funded first by Republicans, then by the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign….

    Yet Comey allegedly signed three of the FISA applications on behalf of the FBI. Deputy Director Andrew McCabe reportedly signed one and former Attorney General Sally Yates, then-Acting Deputy Attorney General Dana Boente and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein each reportedly signed one or more.

    Woods Procedures were named for Michael Woods, the FBI official who drafted the rules as head of the Office of General Counsel’s National Security Law Unit. They were instituted in April 2001 to “ensure accuracy with regard to … the facts supporting probable cause” after recurring instances, presumably inadvertent, in which the FBI had presented inaccurate information to the FISA court..

    In the past, when the FBI has presented inaccuracies to the FISA court, it’s been viewed so seriously that it’s drawn the attention of the Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility….

    Prior to Woods Procedures, “[i]ncorrect information was repeated in subsequent and related FISA packages,” the FBI told Congress in August 2003. “By signing and swearing to the declaration, the headquarters agent is attesting to knowledge of what is contained in the declaration.”
    and <===READ!!!


  2. Robster says:

    Here’s my take.

    Listen from 4:30 of the vid. Himes: ‘nothing from the dossier has been disproven, not a single thing in that dossier has been disproven’.

    My follow up question would have been, ‘Okay Congressman Himes, let’s take that statement at face value that nothing has been disproven in the Steele dossier.

    Steele’s dossier states that Russia itself has a dossier of compromising material on Hillary Clinton that has been collated by Russian Intelligence Services over many years and mainly comprises bugged conversations she had on various visits to Russia and intercepted phone calls. The dossier is controlled by Kremlin spokesman, Peskov, directly on Putin’s orders. However this has not been distributed abroad or to Trump.

    Steele’s source B confirmed the existence of the Russian dossier of ‘kompromat’ on Hillary Clinton dating back to her husband’s presidency.

    Considering the Kremlin has ‘yet to be disproven’ compromising information on Hillary Clinton dating back 20yrs and also ‘yet to be disproven’ compromising information on now President Trump dating back 5yrs, why did the FBI only seek and obtain FISA warrants and open an investigation on then candidate Trump?

    Why did the FBI not seek or obtain a FISA warrant or a counter-intelligence investigation into the Clinton ‘kompromat’?

    Liked by 3 people

  3. LULU says:

    Himes is as dumb as a post. I was disgruntled when Maria seemed so welcoming. Then she began questioning him. He flunked her questions, and she kept attacking. She knew she was on solid ground. She was merciless. It was a joy to see. She ended up dismissing him and he left with an embarrassed smile on his face.. “Like wha?” Never knew what hit him….

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s