G20 – President Trump, President Peña Nieto and Justin From Canada Sign USMCA Agreement…

On the sidelines of the G20 summit in Argentina, U.S. President Trump, Mexican President Pena Nieto and Justin from Canada deliver remarks prior to signing the NAFTA replacement agreement, the USMCA. [White House Statement Here]

The USMCA is a major structural shift in the U.S., Mexico and Canada, trade agreement. While the new agreement does not form an actual trade-bloc, the agreement removes most of the exploitation of the U.S. market that existed within NAFTA. The U.S. and Mexico are the primary benefactors; Canada notsomuch.


[Transcript] Buenos Aires, Argentina – 9:24 A.M. AST – PRESIDENT TRUMP: Thank you very much. We’re gathered together this afternoon for a very historic occasion: The signing ceremony for a brand new trade deal, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. So important.

I’m honored to be here with President Enrique Peña Nieto — who’s become a great friend — of Mexico, and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who has also become a great friend, who has — this has been a battle, and battles sometimes make great friendships. So it’s really terrific.

With our signatures today, we will formally declare the intention of our three countries to replace NAFTA with the USMCA a truly groundbreaking achievement. A modern-day agreement.

I want to thank U.S. Trade Representative Bob Lighthizer and his entire team for their tremendous effort and the efforts that they’ve made all throughout the last almost two-year period.

Thank you as well to Jared Kushner, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Secretary of the Treasury Steve Mnuchin, and Director Larry Kudlow for their hard work and untiring devotion throughout the negotiation process. Peter Navarro, thank you so much for the work that you put in. And so many others.

The USMCA is the largest, most significant, modern, and balanced trade agreement in history. All of our countries will benefit greatly. It is probably the largest trade deal ever made, also. In the United States, the new trade pact will support high-paying manufacturing jobs and promote greater access for American exports across the range of sectors, including our farming, manufacturing, and service industries.

As part of our agreement, the United States will be able to lock in our market access to Canada and Mexico, and greatly expand our agricultural exports — something we’ve been wanting to do for many years. This is an amazing deal for our farmers, and also allows them to use cutting-edge biotechnology, and eliminates non-scientific barriers.

Our nations have also agreed to innovate new measures to ensure fair competition and promote high wages, and higher wages, for U.S. and North American autoworkers. The autoworkers are a tremendous beneficiary.

Under the USMCA, at least 75 percent of our automobiles’ content must be manufactured in North America, and 40 to 45 percent of automobile content must be manufactured by North American high-wage labor in order to gain preferential access to our markets. This will help stop auto jobs from going overseas and it will bring back auto jobs that have already left. Many, many jobs are already planning to come back. Many companies are coming back, and we’re very excited about that.

This landmark agreement includes intellectual property protections that will be the envy of nations all around the world. The USMCA also contains robust new provisions on digital trade and financial services, and the most ambitious environmental and labor protections ever placed into a major trade agreement anywhere at any time.

We have dramatically raised standards for combatting unfair trade practices; confronting massive subsidies for state-owned enterprises; and, currently, if you look at it, currency manipulation that hurt workers in all three of our countries. The currency manipulation from some countries is so intense, so bad, and it would hurt Mexico, Canada, and the United States badly. We’ve covered it very well in this agreement.

These new provisions will benefit labor, technology, and development in each of our nations, leading to much greater growth and opportunity throughout our countries and across North America.

In short, this is a model agreement that changes the trade landscape forever. And this is an agreement that, first and foremost, benefits working people — something of great importance to all three of us here today.

President — I must say, Peña Nieto and Prime Minister Trudeau, we’ve worked hard on this agreement. It’s been long and hard. We’ve taken a lot of barbs and a little abuse. And we got there. It’s great for all of our countries.

Thank you for your close partnership throughout this process. This new agreement will ensure a future of prosperity and innovation for Mexico, Canada, and the United States. I look forward to working with members of Congress and the USMCA partners — and I have to say, it’s been so well reviewed, I don’t expect to have very much of a problem — to ensure the complete implementation of our agreement.

Enrique, I want to thank you on a personal note, and I want to wish you the very best. This will be your last day in office, so that’s a very auspicious day when you can sign something so important. But we really do appreciate it. I think I can speak for Justin when I say that. (Applause.) We both — we both agree he’s a special man. And he’s really done a good job, and we appreciate it very much. Thank you.

So I just want to congratulate you on ending your term in office with this incredible milestone. It is really an incredible way to end a presidency. You don’t see that happen very often.

I look forward to working with President-elect López Obrador for many years to come. And our relationship, I know, will be a very good one. We’ve had great conversations and I think we’re going to have a great, great relationship.

And I would now like to invite the President and the Prime Minister to say a few words. And perhaps we can start with Justin. And we appreciate it very much. Thank you. Justin, please. (Applause.)

PRIME MINISTER TRUDEAU: Good morning. Thank you all for being here, and thank you to Presidents Trump and Peña Nieto. Donald, thank you for your words this morning. Thank you for pulling this event together. Enrique, this, as Donald said, on your last day in office, it’s a wonderful pleasure to see you and to be here on this historic moment.

The new North American Free Trade Agreement maintains stability for Canada’s entire economy — stability that’s essential for the millions of jobs and middle-class families across the country that rely on strong, reliable trading relationships with our closest neighbors. That’s why I’m here today.

The new agreement lifts the risk of serious economic uncertainty that lingers throughout a trade renegotiation process. Uncertainty that would have only gotten worse and more damaging had we not reached a new NAFTA.

But when faced with this challenge, Canadians came together and rolled up their sleeves. Canadians from every order of government and walks of life put their country’s interests first and worked hard to achieve a new, modernized agreement that will protect jobs, strengthen the middle class, and create new opportunities for businesses.

There’s much more work to do in lowering trade barriers and in fostering growth that benefits everyone. But reaching a new free trade agreement with the United States and Mexico is a major step for our economy.

Canadians got here because Team Canada was driven by the interests of the middle class. Free and fair trade leads to more and better-paying middle-class jobs for more people. And the benefits of trade must be broadly and fairly shared. That is what modernizing NAFTA achieves, and that is why it was always so important to get this new agreement done right.

As a result, the tariff-free access that NAFTA guaranteed for more than 70 percent of Canada’s total exports is secure. And that’s essential for businesses, families, jobs, entrepreneurs, and hardworking people in every corner of our country.

As I said, the task isn’t done. There is more hard work ahead to build resilient, strong economies that support families everywhere in Canada.

As I discussed with President Trump a few days ago, the recent plant closures by General Motors, which affects thousands of Canadian and American workers and their families, are a heavy blow. Make no mistake: We will stand up for our workers and fight for their families and their communities.

And, Donald, it’s all the more reason why we need to keep working to remove the tariffs on steel and aluminum between our countries.

With hard work, good will, and determination, I’m confident we will get there. Our shared interests, prosperity, and security demand it.

Before wrapping up, I’d like to personally thank our Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland, along with U.S. Trade Representative Bob Lighthizer, and Mexican Secretary of the Economy Ildefonso Guajardo for all their hard work and dedication since the very beginning of this process. I’d also like to thank Ambassador David MacNaughton, Chief Negotiator Steve Verheul, and their talented and extremely hardworking staff.

Once again, thank you all for being here today. (Applause.)

PRESIDENT PEÑA NIETO: (As interpreted.) President of the United States, Donald Trump; Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau; distinguished members of the delegations joining us today: To both, I would like to thank you for your generous remarks.

This is precisely the last day of my administration, ladies and gentlemen, members of the media. During the last day of my administration as President, I am honored to be here standing next to the leaders of two countries who are friends and partners in this signing ceremony of the new trade agreement between Mexico, the U.S., and Canada.

The agreement that we will sign today expresses the shared will by our three nations to work together towards the wellbeing and prosperity of each one of our societies. This day is the culmination of a long process based on dialogue and negotiations that allow us to overcome differences and to conciliate our visions. Once signed, the agreement will be sent to our congresses for its ratification. It will be then when this innovative instrument bears fruit by offering a more inclusive, firm, and modern foundation for our future exchanges.

The negotiation of USMCA allowed to reaffirm the importance of economic integration in North America. For more than a quarter of a century ago, our three countries have maintained very tight trade relationships. Such trade has transformed Mexico. Today, our exchanges abroad represent more than 70 percent of our gross domestic product.

And this has contributed to the fact that, today, the benefits of trade with the world are broadly valued by the Mexican society. Revamping the new trade agreement was aimed to preserve the view of an integrated North America, with a firm belief that together we are stronger and more competitive.

In spite of the progress that we’ve seen in our trade relationship in the last two decades, there was still a long road ahead of us to take advantage of each country’s potential. The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement gives a renewed face to the process of integration. This process achieved, on the first place, to modernize our trade framework. Trade agreements shall not be static. Agreements need to move along with the economy and should be according to the needs of our society.

The inclusion of new provisions on e-commerce, information technologies, and trade-enabling practices are now part of the agreement. In fact, one third of the agreement includes topics that were not included in the current agreement. The renegotiating process of the agreement allowed our region to move into a more inclusive integration — a type of integration that listens to the demands of our societies.

Twenty-four years ago, NAFTA set a new benchmark for trade agreements back then. Today, USMCA is the first trade agreement that incorporates elements that address the social impact of international trade. It enables the participation of more sectors in the economy, including the participation of SMEs in regional trade. It extends the protection of workers’ rights, strengthens the protection of the environment, and also includes a review clause that would make easier that the agreement is revamped more constantly. And this is a true sign of the will we have put in this agreement — the decision to provide more and better opportunities to our peoples.

I would like to acknowledge the work done by the negotiators from the three countries. Each team advocated for each country’s interests. And by doing this, you reached a very positive result for the sake of all countries.

In the case of Mexico, this work bears testimony of the work of the business community who were present during the process, and specifically the new administration that will take office tomorrow. Your support, and the alignment of visions in the last phase, contributed to the success of this renegotiation process.
I would like to say that I sincerely acknowledge President Trump and Prime Minister Trudeau for their vision and the vision that they have put into the process. Thanks to you, President Trump and Prime Minister Trudeau, the agreement that we have signed today will allow each country to gain individually, but also North America will grow stronger and will grow to be more prosperous.

Ladies and gentlemen, currently in the world, each country’s future is firmly linked to what happens in other countries. In North America, we understand this very clearly. We understand that each society’s prosperity will be greater and will be deeply rooted if it’s based in the prosperity of the region as a whole.

This signing ceremony, it is a sign that Mexico, the United States, and Canada, being close — not only due to our geography but on values and our expectations — we’re ready to begin a new chapter in our shared history. Thank you very much. (Applause.)

(The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement is signed.)

END – 9:43 A.M. AST

This entry was posted in Auto Sector, Canada, Economy, G20, Mexico, NAFTA, President Trump, Trade Deal, Uncategorized, USMCA. Bookmark the permalink.

76 Responses to G20 – President Trump, President Peña Nieto and Justin From Canada Sign USMCA Agreement…

  1. motreehouse says:

    Wolverines are cool!

    Liked by 4 people

  2. RF121, Blitherer in Chief says:

    So. Do we have 67 votes to ratify this thing?

    Liked by 3 people

    • sundance says:

      Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) was designed by the Big Club to benefit Obama and Clinton. It flipped the needed vote threshold for approvals.

      Trump is now exploiting that Senate construct.

      Remember the Senate flipped the rules. Instead of 67 votes to approve a trade agreement; TPA means it takes 67 votes to disapprove a treaty.

      Liked by 27 people

    • Ristvan says:

      USMCA is not a Treaty. It is a pact with sunsets and opt outs. Only requires majority approval in both houses of congress.

      Liked by 3 people

  3. progpoker says:

    New NAFTA?
    Good Lord, Justin is a tool.

    Liked by 6 people

    • George Hicks says:

      You can just feel our President’s disdain for Socks, the way he looks at him and diminishes his presence.
      Little Socky Boy should stop referring to our President as Donald, have some respect for a great leader…you could learn a thing or two from him.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. railer says:

    Poor Justin, he just looks out of place. I think the steel and aluminum tariffs just got 10 feet taller.

    Liked by 6 people

  5. woohoowee says:

    Merry Christmas, America 🙂

    Liked by 2 people

  6. motreehouse says:

    Liked by 15 people

  7. Sentient says:

    If Congress were to say “no” to USMCA, it’s not like we’d still have NAFTA, right? It’s USMCA or no agreement at all, correct? I thought I heard that Pocahantas was already bellyaching. I’m sure there’ll be a lot of posturing.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. rbette1299 says:

    USMCA is a ruse being labeled a “better deal” than NAFTA but will gut states rights as well as individual freedom in the US. It is as bad as the TPP and we will pay a heavy price in loss of our Constitutional and Sovereign rights as soon as it is approved. Consider the language in just a few anti Constitutional Articles.
    “Article 23.3 of the USMCA’s Chapter 23 obligates each country to “adopt and maintain in its statutes and regulations, … the effective recognition of the right to collective bargaining.” It is unclear how such provisions could conflict with states that have “right-to-work laws,” potentially opening the door to their abolition or repeal either through the USMCA’s implementation legislation or a future decision from a USMCA dispute resolution panel.
    Although the USMCA does not include a separate chapter on gender-related issues, as was originally outlined among Canada’s goals, such language is sprinkled throughout the labor chapter, further advancing the LGBTQ agenda. For example, under “Sex-Based Discrimination in the Workplace,” in the USMCA’s labor chapter, all three countries are required to promote and “implement policies” protecting “gender identity.” And under Article 23.12, all three countries agree to cooperate on “addressing gender-related issues in the field of labor and employment,” as well as on “addressing the opportunities of a diverse workforce, including: … promotion of equality and elimination of employment discrimination in the areas of age, disability, race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity … and protection of migrant workers.” (Emphasis added.) In other words, if a man applies for a job and goes to the interview dressed as a woman with a demand to be addressed as if he were a lady and demonstrates even the mildest aptitude to do the job, the employer would be required to hire that individual or risk a lawsuit. Unfortunately the same protections are seldom applied to victims of “Christophobic,” or anti-Christian, discrimination.
    Chapter 23 of the USMCA could also serve as a beachhead for a cross-border migration invasion similar to that experienced in the European Union. In language that is virtually identical to that found in the TPP, Article 17.5 of Chapter 17 of the USMCA states: “No party shall adopt or maintain … a measure that … imposes a limitation on … the total number of natural persons that may be employed in a particular financial service sector or that a financial institution or cross-border service supplier may employ … in the form of numerical quotas or the requirement of an economic needs test.” This opens the door for Mexico and its incoming radical socialist government or for a Mexican, a Canadian, or even a U.S.-based company to sue the U.S. government for restricting the number of employees that such a company would want to bring across the border into the United States. As well, provisions from USMCA’s Chapters 17 and 23 have the potential to undermine President Trump’s border security measures and further open our nation’s borders. Article 23.8 on “Migrant Workers” requires each country to “ensure that migrant workers are protected under its labor laws, whether they are nationals or non-nationals” of the country they are residing in. (Emphasis added.)
    Everything Sessions said about the TPP could also accurately be said about the USMCA. Chapter 30 of the USMCA establishes the creation of a “Free Trade Commission,” which is broader in scope and power than the original 1994 NAFTA Free Trade Commission. According to Article 30.2, the USMCA reads, “The Commission shall”:
    (a) consider matters relating to the implementation or operation of this Agreement; (b) consider proposals to amend or modify this Agreement; (c) supervise the work of committees, working groups, and other subsidiary bodies established under this Agreement; (d) consider ways to further enhance trade and investment between the Parties; (e) adopt and update the Rules of Procedure and Code of conduct; and
    (f) review the roster established under Article 31.8 (Roster and Qualifications of Panelists) every three years and, when appropriate, constitute a new roster. In other words, the USMCA’s Free Trade Commission can make changes to the agreement itself, implement changes to the agreement, change the rules by which it operates, approve who serves on its lower subordinate committees, and oversee the work of those committees like an international bureaucracy or government — all without the consent or approval of Congress.” https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/30541-what-s-wrong-with-the-usmca


  9. Publius2016 says:

    Heres a good one: if O Canada didnt want to hold up the bill, then why sign?

    Liked by 1 person

  10. f.fernandez says:

    BEND THE KNEE World. The free money has run out.

    Liked by 2 people

  11. TrumpsterinPa says:

    Love when President Trump pulls out that big, black, beautiful sharpie and lays his John Hancock down. Like a Boss.

    Liked by 4 people

  12. NoFixedAddress says:


    The EU and China are ‘sh$tting’ themselves over this agreement.

    Liked by 3 people

  13. SHV says:

    “USMCA is not a Treaty. It is a pact with sunsets and opt outs. Only requires majority approval in both houses of congress.”
    I read that Congressional action on USMCA won’t begin, at the earliest, until February 2019. What are the chances that the Dem. controlled House will approve it?…I’m thinking, no matter how good USMCA is, a signifiant number of Dems will vote no inorder to “stick it” to PDJT.

    If USMCA doesn’t receive Congressional approval, then what happens?


    • Dennis Leonard says:

      You know reading is a virtue,

      sundance says:
      November 30, 2018 at 4:05 pm
      Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) was designed by the Big Club to benefit Obama and Clinton. It flipped the needed vote threshold for approvals.

      Trump is now exploiting that Senate construct.

      Remember the Senate flipped the rules. Instead of 67 votes to approve a trade agreement; TPA means it takes 67 votes to disapprove a treaty.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Johnny says:

      Please read Ristvan comments up thread. He is the lurking lawyer on here regularly.

      Liked by 1 person

    • SHV says:

      “Here’s a quick rundown of the procedure the deal would have to go through:”


      “The House will consider the agreement first under the Constitution’s provision mandating that revenue bills originate in the lower chamber. A vote could take up to nine months or longer, according to senior administration officials.”

      IMO, a long way from becoming law.


      • jeans2nd says:

        Oh, please. Glenn Thrush? At the NY Times? “Could Be” ?
        You expect us to believe this stuff?
        Are you aware on which site you are commenting? hint – most here were not born yesterday.

        Try again. Do better next time. Tell the Democrats they should have done their own agenda when Obama was Pres and they had two years of supermajority in the Senate, and control of the House.

        Liked by 1 person

  14. NJF says:

    What’s Ms Barney aka Christina looking so Smug about? 🤔


  15. Me says:

    Mexican President’s last day in office. They really have a long time between the election and the incoming newly elected President.


  16. Me says:

    Mexican President’s last day in office. They really have a long time between the election and the incoming newly elected President.


  17. frank field says:

    Lighthizer was not mentioned during our beloved president’s prepared remarks. Lighthizer must have written it. He cannot be praised enough. Trump didn’t gloat, Canada just submitted to an ASS WHOOPING! I’m so proud of our beloved Trump. So thankful!

    I know, I should feel sorry for Canada. Just can’t. Just win baby!


  18. jeans2nd says:

    The U Smacka, just for Justin from Canada.
    Oh, how I love that name… U Smacka. So apropos. Just for Justin. And Princess Rainbow Sparkles, aka Barney, of course. lolol


  19. David K. Peers says:

    It’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau not Justin from Canada.

    Your “ugly American” is showing. Probably best being a bit more gracious if you want your allies to keep helping you fight all your wars.


    • G. Combs says:

      No, you are correct it is not ‘Justin from Canada’ f it is ‘Sparkle Socks from Canada’!

      BTW I call the last resident of the White House OH‼️ Bummer‼️ (Red for Commie of course.)

      I liked Prime Minister Harper.


    • formerdem says:

      reminder: he can say anything he wants other than advocating for the violent overthrow of the United States. Yes We Can.


    • Voltaire says:

      We have freedom of speech here in America.

      Y’all should try it up there….

      Might not have another BOY running your country in the future.


  20. Sunshine says:

    Did anybody notice that JUSTIN is the only one that didn’t hold up the signed deal at the end?
    Look at Nieto’s reaction. And Trump is simply avoiding Justin.
    So, we all know Justin is not happy.


  21. Maybe he wasn’t happy with Donny’s bullying?

    Btw, grace and free speech are not the same thing. Regardless of what side of the border you’re on we all value our right to free speech. Those who value it the most don’t diminish their audience by using it stupidly.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s