Part II: Senate Judiciary Hearing: Judge Brett Kavanaugh -vs- Christine Blasey Ford – 2:45pm EST Livestream

The afternoon session of the Senate Judiciary Committee will begin shortly with   testimony from Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh, following the morning testimony of accuser Christine Blasey Ford. Anticipated start time is 3:00pm EST.

C-SPAN Livestream LinkFox News Livestream LinkABC Livestream Link

Alternate Livestream #1Alternate Livestream #2

.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Cultural Marxism, Decepticons, Dem Hypocrisy, Legislation, Live Streaming, media bias, Notorious Liars, Supreme Court, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3,424 Responses to Part II: Senate Judiciary Hearing: Judge Brett Kavanaugh -vs- Christine Blasey Ford – 2:45pm EST Livestream

  1. rjcylon says:

    The judge is a fighter. Ruining someone’s life is nothing to the left, but if he is confirmed it could be the first significant pushback against the metoo witch-hunt movement.

    Liked by 6 people

    • YL Calif says:

      Anyone else notice that Christine Ford’s fake testimony sounds a lot like the fake testimony by Nayirah, the Kuwaiti girl that was coached by Hill & Knowles PR firm to make up the story about babies thrown out of incubators to get the Gulf War started?
      Listen Christine Ford’s speech pattern in her fake testimony and then listen to Nayirah fake testimony to the Senate decades ago . . . same quiver in the voice, same cadence.

      Like

  2. Liked by 20 people

  3. magakathryn says:

    My personal take …. something happened that messed her up. I think the key is that boy Garrett. She refused to say his name – seemed more upset about him than anything else.

    Said she dated Garrett for about 2 months. Said he introduced her to Brett. Brett doesn’t ever remember meeting her. She said she saw Brett multiple times. Brett said his group didn’t hang out with the girls from Holton Arms. Garrett had a younger brother that went to the country club – can’t remember if she said he did the swimming thing too (that’s probably how she met Garrett).

    She probably had a crush on Brett and he never even noticed her. Payback for being scorned by her dream boy.

    Liked by 7 people

  4. Donzo says:

    In regard to the repeated question to Kavanaugh about whether he would ask the President for an FBI investigation, if, or I should say, when in the future the Dems withhold important info at a confirmation hearing in order to buy time to spring it on the committee at the 11th hour after the appropriate time has passed for when it should have been handed over for more in-depth consideration, then will the standard be that the nominee needs agree to personally ask the President for an FBI investigation or else he or she or will be considered less than forthcoming?
    Why have a confirmation process if the senators want to nominee to do their jobs? If I had an doubts about the degree to which we need to respond to these rodents, what was done to the Kavanaugh family made me realize that Republicans need to crush into the earth the Democrap Party and do so with extreme prejudice. What a disgrace for the nation!

    Liked by 3 people

    • Donzo says:

      Sorry about 2 typos.

      Liked by 1 person

    • CHARLES W. LAUDERDALE, LTC US ARMY RETIRED says:

      FYI: COPY OF MESSAGE I SENT THE PRESIDENT AND MY CONGRESSMAN.

      Mr. President:
      Cc. Congressman L. Gohmert

      To supplement the copy of my response to a Last Refuge article I provided you and my Congressman in which I outlined how a law enforcement agency determines jurisdiction, existence of probable cause, and the degree of resources to expend investigating an alleged crime; I now issue you and your legal advisors a challenge.

      Based on the information/evidence I have collected (with very little effort, I might add) I will come to DC with only myself and two retired US Army CID agents who worked for me in Panama while I was serving as Commander, of the US Army Criminal Investigation Agency, Canal Zone/Republic of Panama (these are the same two agents who were the primary investigators on the still classified case I referenced in the document I provided your office in 02/2017) and we will deliver to you within 30 days the following:

      1. A complete case file containing evidence as to the roles played by all the key players in building and presenting the so-called sexual assault allegation against Judge Kavanaugh.

      2. In detail, we will provide details that prove that Doctor Ford was prepped as the primary player in a poorly developed/presented plan to totally discredit Judge Kavanaugh, derail his appointment, and challenge your authority as the President of the United States of American.

      We will require no support except:

      1. Temporary appointments as special agents of the Department of Justice under the supervision of an official with full subpoena powers.

      2. Access to all pertinent DOJ/FBI and Senate Files.

      Liked by 5 people

  5. Lumina says:

    I wonder if Dr Ford has the strength to stand up to her handlers…
    She seemed unaware they would have flown to CA and who outed her. Poor woman has been used….

    Liked by 2 people

    • JAS says:

      She probably takes drugs to get on a plane. I know a number of people that do that. Xanax and a drink being the cocktail of choice

      Liked by 2 people

      • patrickhenrycensored says:

        She takes xanax to relieve the fear of breathing.

        Liked by 4 people

      • lizzieintexas says:

        Heck I do that but I am not afraid of flying. I just want to sleep through the entire, miserable experience of being treated like a prisoner. I have all but quit flying but will for the right or necessary reasons.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Eberhard says:

        I have a relative with a real fear of flying. No way can her husband get her to go on a vacation to Tahiti, Hawaii, etc. Its not “easier on vacation” …it’s a phobia. She can be persuaded to fly for only the most imperative days of her life, like her daughters difficult birth of a grandchild. Even funerals are optional.

        This woman flies way too much to use that excuse. Testifying to her “ordeal” was less important than scuba diving in Tahiti?

        Liked by 4 people

        • bofh says:

          Hey, testifying to the Senate – pffft. But really, how many times do you get a chance to go to Tahiti? It’s a no-brainer…

          Like

        • Esperanza says:

          Easier on vacation. But won’t do it to wreck some poor guys life.

          Anyone notice NONE of this would be admissible in a court of law? Yet it’s allowed to choose judges.

          Like

    • phoenixRising says:

      how could she have been unaware?
      Grassley’s comments were all over Twitter…
      and Grassley notified her directly.

      Liked by 4 people

    • kea says:

      I can’t feel sorry for someone like that.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Koot Katmando says:

      I do not think she was used. I think she got what she wanted. The accusations were obviously concocted to avoid being proved or disproved. No location, no date, …..

      Liked by 3 people

    • DJ says:

      There is a deeper story here. She has Dissociative Identity Disorder which used to be called Multiple Personality Disorder. Years ago, I was in a relationship with a person who was diagnosed with this. It actually explains many aspects of Ms Ford’s testimony today including why she appeared so childlike – she actually was a child today. Other days, she can be someone else. So, for instance, some days she can be afraid to fly, but other days – no problem. Some personality states can know things that others do not. So the child today did not now the meaning of terms are could understand concepts that someone with a PhD should know. The whole concept is rather complicated, but I was definitely having deja vue all over again while watching her performance today.

      Liked by 2 people

      • AH_C says:

        I’ve seen others speculating on 8chan.

        Liked by 1 person

      • The Boss says:

        She certainly appeared to have some kind of disorder. Was her hubby there to help her through the day? I don’t recall ever hearing anything about a husband.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Lumina says:

        Sounds probable…a friend in high school college had this…I often wonder what caused it….nice family..

        Like

      • covfefe_USA says:

        Very, very interesting – I very much appreciate your insight on this. Its the only thing that can make any sense. The whiny, teary child like voice was ridiculous. The child like request for caffeine was ridiculous. An adult already has a cup of coffee in hand – with all the helpers at her beck and call – she needs to whine like a little girl????? The whole thing was so bizzarre I couldn’t take much more than 5 mins – she’s a deeply troubled person.

        Liked by 2 people

      • ladypenquin says:

        Sybil.

        Liked by 1 person

      • TheLastDemocrat says:

        BULL CRAP.

        There is no such thing as “multiple identity disorder.”

        Please shut up with this nonsense.

        And, WATCH: IF THERE IS, THEN HER “GIRL” PERSONALITY HAS NO IDEA WHAT HAPPENED TODAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        Let’s see if TOMORROW she is surprised to know she TESTIFIED IN FRONT OF A CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE.

        Ya think???????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        No. i didn’t think so.

        Please don’t post any more blatant, full-throttle ignorance like this. thanks!

        Like

        • DJ says:

          “There is no such thing as “multiple identity disorder.””
          ———————————————————–
          Many people share your opinion – others, not so much.

          “And, WATCH: IF THERE IS, THEN HER “GIRL” PERSONALITY HAS NO IDEA WHAT HAPPENED TODAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”
          ——————————————————————————
          Nope, not always that simple.

          “Please don’t post any more blatant, full-throttle ignorance like this. thanks!”
          ———————————————————————————-
          Too late and you’re welcome.

          Have a good hissy fit.

          Like

          • LouisianaTeaRose says:

            Allright, allright, simmer down, let Auntie LTR whoop out her copy of the DSM-5 so we can get this DX all straightened out, OK you kids?

            Like

  6. snarkybeach says:

    Citizen’s United just aired a GREAT ad supporting Judge Kavanaugh on Lou Dobbs. Hard hitting about DiFi’s spy, Skelator Blumenthal’s stolen valor and Tom Carper’s wife beating.

    Liked by 9 people

  7. 4gypsybreeze says:

    I will be calling and leaving a message at Flake office again tomorrow. He said…there will always be doubt. Excuse me – I will NEVER have doubt regarding his innocence! Evidence matters. Dr. Ford had no evidence. Judge Kavanaugh has his calendar, and the sworn statements of three that she said that were at the party…that it did not happen–no party, nothing.

    So many holes in her story, I cannot believe her. Period. Yes, perhaps she did experience some sexual trauma….hope she seeks further therapy to find out where it did happen…but clear that it didn’t happen with Judge Kavanaugh.

    Dems exposed as being heartless. They are the ones who exposed Dr. Ford, didn’t follow procedures for investigation, etc. Republicans were nice to Ford, Dems not so nice to Judge.
    Circus. Total circus.

    Liked by 5 people

  8. Dazza says:

    I wouldn’t want to be stuck in a rest room with Booker and Blumenflamer.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. sunnydaze says:

    The Women for Kav DC Rally from 8:30 AM today is on replay Cspan 3 now

    Liked by 2 people

  10. Sigh2016 says:

    DiFi just proved her concerns are for her and her office. She literally just threw Ford’s friends under the bus that they probably leaked to the press.

    Liked by 6 people

  11. thomaspain1961 says:

    In 1982 I was ship’s company on the USS Coral Sea and we were ported in Alameda. We had just returned from a WestPac and we were to participate in San Francisco’s Fleet Week. This meant we had to leave Alameda and port in the China Basin across the bay which meant I had to bus and BART back to Alameda to my car. We also had to depart the ship in our crackerjacks. Shaking the hand of every sailor leaving the ship was mayor diane feinstein. She took my hand with a half assed handshake and gave me the most insincere greeting I have ever received.
    Maybe I should go public and claim she groped me and praised Reagan.

    Liked by 5 people

  12. budmc says:

    Liked by 9 people

  13. David says:

    I am your Israeli friend. Don’t get mad at me but I see three things:
    1. Mrs Ford is acting. She is a radical liberal psychotic Psychologist.
    2. Kavanaugh is not clean either. He was not going to be on Trump’s side in case the FBI is complicating the case against Trump.
    3. So basically this thing is going to be for the better in the long run.
    This is just another “lucky” protection of Trump. I am sure it is missed by most analysts.

    Liked by 2 people

  14. thedoc00 says:

    Woof Candice Owens is smoken on Dr Ford…

    Liked by 4 people

    • thedoc00 says:

      It was amazing hearing Lou Dobbs defending Ford.

      Like

      • ladypenquin says:

        I think that’s the safe line for now. Better to let them be sympathetic to Ford. If she is blatantly attacked the quislings will get upset. They catch these news’ sources too.

        But I’m with Candace 100%. Ford was a put up job. As regards who leaked her letter, and Feinstein denying, who got Ford in touch with THOSE lawyers? This has Clinton syndicate written all over it. Ford gave the story to the WaPo – what did she think was going to happen.

        So many holes in her story, it’s leaking like a sieve. No, this was a set up from start to finish.

        Liked by 4 people

        • znoxide says:

          As a sweet and innocent naive psychology professor what was she supposed to do. When phrases like “on your behalf” through her mind into a tailspin, she may have thought WaPo would remain confidential.

          Rush didn’t know why they were getting deposition information on the republican side. After watching the prosecutor’s questioning, I suspect Dr. Ford will be in some legal jeopardy once this is all over. There were several verifiable pieces of testimony under oath.

          Liked by 1 person

  15. thedoc00 says:

    Dobbs says vote is on for 9:30 am tomorrow, after Republicans met following hearing.

    Liked by 2 people

  16. Patriot1783 says:

    Just announced vote is on for 930 tomorrow morning!

    Liked by 2 people

  17. Liked by 2 people

    • jello333 says:

      Yay! I couldn’t understand why they were talking about waiting till Monday or Tuesday for the full Senate vote. These guys often stay in session for important stuff, late night, over weekends, whatever. So YAY… Saturday sounds great.

      Liked by 2 people

      • ladypenquin says:

        Have to have him voted out of the Judicial Committee first. Then he goes to the full Senate for a vote. Doubt it can be before Monday or Tuesday.

        Like

        • jello333 says:

          Yes, the committee votes tomorrow. And apparently there’s a chance the full Senate will then go… sooner than they’ve been saying. It would be GREAT if they did it over the weekend, which would prevent the Sunday Hit Job shows from doing their thing.

          Liked by 2 people

      • Andy Krause says:

        They are in a bind because they need to leave D.C. to go back to their home districts and campaign for the mid-terms. McConnell promised to stay open until they voted. I think they will vote tomorrow and Saturday so they can go home.

        Liked by 2 people

  18. V says:

    Quite a juxtaposition symbolical of the evil v good:

    Prof. Ford speaks of brain parts – the biological – believes she is her brain, no concept of soul, no conscience. So – the evil ones believe they are finite. Good, so they’ll perish. No eternity for them.

    Judge Kavanaugh ends the day stating his belief in God.

    There was a moment when he was speaking when I could see him as a huge, big spirit speaking through his physical body and it lasted all the way

    He and his family will be unscathed. Ultimately, who cares what a piece of dust thinks.

    This will be the evil ones’ swan song – they’ll be dust in the wind.

    Liked by 4 people

  19. Kitten says:

    Liked by 1 person

  20. coltlending says:

    I know Judge Kavanaugh told the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth because if he did not anyone who could testify and prove otherwise has a license to print Soto’s money.

    Liked by 1 person

  21. There she goes!

    Liked by 6 people

    • V says:

      Oh yummy, evil ones fighting each other.

      Actually, I think during the testimony Ford did admit she was the one who contacted WaPo. But Feinstein got quite defensive about her and her staff being the leakers at the end of the day.

      Like

  22. hardworkingsob says:

    The shame that Democrats brought upon themselves this date will be a turning point in American politics.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Ivehadit says:

      Yes, it will…as it should be.
      Democrats will never get this as they are the party of expediency a.k.a. whatever you can get away with is your standard M.O.

      Like

    • Dabigragu says:

      They should feel shame but they don’t. Tune into their channel for just a short moment, they’re so busy telling the few viewers their version of what happened today. Telling them what to think and feel about what transpired today.

      Like

  23. Sigh2016 says:

    If Hillary had won the election we would feel the way we feel today every day. Thank You, Sweet Lord. I pray You intervene again.

    Liked by 4 people

  24. Donzo says:

    I am embarrassed for any person with a Phd who acts as clueless and polyannaish as Ford did. She will infantilize women, setting them back, if her childish testimony is held up as a model for women.

    Liked by 2 people

    • V says:

      Ha, I laughed at her illiteracy when she admitted she didn’t know the meaning of “exculpatory” evidence. How can she be a PhD doing research if she doesn’t know that? How unscientific would be her research – it’s not just a legal term. She’d set out to prove A and if anything comes up that disproves A, she’d disregard it!

      Like

    • Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

      The way they have been handing out “Piled High & Deep” PhDs these days the only ones worthy of the moniker doctor are the MDs. Like all the democrats involved in today’s disgrace, over-schooled and under-educated.

      M A G A ~ ~ K A G

      Like

    • sunnydaze says:

      …” She will infantilize women, setting them back, if her childish testimony is held up as a model for women “…….

      Pretty sure that’s the Dem Party Plan, Donzo. So she fits the bill , perfectly.

      Like

  25. Donzo says:

    I won’t say it was a mistake to have a sex crimes prosecutor, but Mitchell was a mistake based on her obvious performance. I will say that it showed that the Repubs were not trying to tip the tables which must be worth something.

    Like

    • V says:

      Re Mitchell

      Two good things: she exposed that Ford travels frequently in planes for business, pleasure and visiting parents. She FLEW to DC for this appearance. And this after the public was told she was so traumatized from the event 36 years ago that she got claustrophobia, couldn’t get in a plane and had to drive across the country to DC. (So that is now exposed as just a lie for the sake of delay.)

      Secondly, that her attorneys did not tell her Grassley had offered to send staff to interview her in California.

      And overall, showed Ford’s vagueness, impreciseness on dates, contradictions in number of people allegedly present at the event, inability to say how she got to and from the alleged house, got her to admit SHE was the one who contacted WaPo, and probably a lot more discovered that I haven’t listed.

      Quite funny actually, at the end of the day Feinstein was on the defensive about whether she or her staff leaked the July Ford letter to WaPo.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Eric says:

      Here’s the thing. 1) This format was not conducive to what Mitchell needed to do. Every time she started to get on a roll, time was up. 2) You cannot get someone with this degree of mental illness to admit they lied. It will never happen. To go down that road in a conventional fashion Mitchell would have to overtly “badger” (that’s how it would be characterized, guaranteed) the witness. And she would just never get there. The borderline kid gloves approach while gradually scoring points was about the best that was going to happen in this scenario.

      Ford was obviously on some sedatives, probably barbiturates, seconal – something to take the edge off. This polygraph deal – total garbage, that’s now how it works. There are separate analysts for “statement analysis”, but they don’t pretend to do a polygraph to verify that. It wouldn’t surprise me if their retired “FBI” person is not a polygrapher but in some other field.

      It comes down to deciding what it’s worth to try to get a crazy person to go back on something they’ve convinced themselves of. All that would have happened is they would have made her a sympathetic figure. Playing it down the line like this allows for fair minded people to make their own decisions based on the evidence, or lack thereof.

      Liked by 3 people

    • andrewalinxs says:

      Mitchell was not for you and me.. She was there to get repub votes.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Jim Smith says:

      The examination by Ms. Mitchell was NOT for the folks watching on TV, nor for the benefit of the pundits. She exposed multiple inconsistencies in Fords testimony. That was for the benefit of the GOP holdouts. Judge her performance on the results of the confirmation vote.

      Liked by 7 people

    • CountryClassVulgarian says:

      First understand what her goal was. Then criticize her.

      Liked by 1 person

  26. Tree observer says:

    She throws her bff and lifelong friend under the bus. Then the only thing she really won’t talk about is the guy “that that Ed Whelan …I don’t want to talk about it or say his name.” Pretty sure if they(she and Chris Garrett) had been seeing each other for a few months. she would have known the layout of his house, knew of the upstairs bathroom. Layout provided by Ed Whelan was spot on.Then she says Ed found him on her Linkdin in page! Still in contact wih him? Hmmmm

    Liked by 1 person

    • treehouseron says:

      That was a HUGE red flag to me. They asked her why her friend says it didn’t happen… and she replied that her friend has mental issues.

      That is literally what happened.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Esperanza says:

      Anyone else think her harping on what happened 35 years ago is kooky? I mean thinking back to my misspent youth (in my case from about 18, I kissed for the first time age 18 and I’ve never been to the kind of parties she’s talking about), it’s all pretty much forgotten. Or should I be looking to take out André L who threw me over in 1980 because I wouldn’t have sex with him? He fumbled with my knickers Xmas 79.

      Liked by 2 people

  27. Ausonius says:

    Well over 3000 replies! Are we PUMPED for November?!

    Stay hungry, stay coldly angry, stay focused, stay confident, and stay the course of NO SURRENDER to Dems, NO COMPROMISE with Dems! They must lose, they must be be booted out of power, they must be opposed in business, in education, in art, in music, in religion, in any aspect of Life, they must be eliminated!

    For too long Republicans have been too willing to play nice, to stay quiet when attacked, to compromise our principles, to surrender our principles, and by doing so have allowed treasonous Dems for 6 decades to take over and dominate American culture and government.

    Behold what the pusillanimity and “reasonable” attitudes of Republicans throughout the years has led to! NO MORE! Even Mr. Graham feels shocked – FINALLY! – by his “friends” on the other side.

    But…how do you have a “friend” in the first place, who supports killing babies, who supports the destruction of America, who supports attacking religion, especially Christianity?

    Liked by 3 people

  28. cplogics says:

    I have not been commenting today but watching the hearings. When watching the “Ford” hearing, I agree with the commenters here that Ford tried very hard to appear naive and yet solicitious of the committee. With Judge Kavanaugh, I was literally reduced to tears at the power and truth in his opening statement. I looked at hm through the eye s of a mother, wife, daughter, sister and wept at the power and veracity of his statement. As they same in sports, he left it all on the field.

    Liked by 1 person

  29. kallibella says:

    I am getting very tired of people on the news, even on FBN, say that she was very credible. I ask: credible about what????!!!! She didn’t provide any evidence, witnesses.Her testimony was a narrative of a tragedy or traumatic event about which she couldn’t say the date of the event, or the place, of who was there or wasn’t and her delivery was very contrived and utterly fake. She is convinced she is messed up, but she can’t point the finger at the Judge with any degree of credibility at all.

    I think she is very calculating and a great actor!

    If something happened to her, she didn’t do anything to advance the cause of finding peace or justice for whatever wrong was done to her.
    I am not persuaded she rehearsed all the angles convincingly.
    BTW, I think the Dems would canonize her now!

    Liked by 1 person

    • V says:

      Spot on!
      Pure PC to call her a sympathetic witness. (Ha, iI never liked the use of that adjective in that way, to mean that a jury would have sympathy FOR the witness. The witness sure doesn’t have sympathy for her victim!)

      This kind of PC speak is expected from her side, but not appreciated coming from conservatives.

      Michelle Malkin was on fire calling a spade a spade on Fox news Thursday night, either Ingraham Angle or Shannon Bream show.

      Liked by 1 person

      • V says:

        Good article – no compromise. Ford unstable, used by Feinstein, her Democrat activist lawyers, Debra Katz and Michael Bromwich et al.
        “Reap the whirlwind” – as Lindsey Graham predicted during the hearing.

        https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/09/postkavanaugh_democrats_will_reap_the_whirlwind.html

        Post-Kavanaugh, Democrats will reap the whirlwind
        By Patricia McCarthy

        “…those lawyers and whoever recruited them should be indicted for cruelty to an unstable person.”

        “The Democrats on the Judiciary Committee revealed their inner selves yesterday, and it was an ugly, ugly picture. Every one of them attacked, demeaned, and verbally assaulted Judge Kavanaugh. Not one of them was civil or respectful to this man, who has led a life of high achievement, service, grace, and class. Booker, Harris, Durbin, Blumenthal, et al. are thugs. They are bullies in search of power with no regard for the truth or decency. No one should ever again vote for any of them. Every one of them has permanently stained their committee and the confirmation process. They have also forever destroyed their own legacies. Their performances today are what each of them will be remembered for.

        Ford’s original letter to Feinstein is so badly written that it is hard to believe it was drafted by an educated person. Dr. Ford did not know the word “exculpatory” but has a Ph.D. Ford seemed as though she was in a dissociative state. She was reciting a studied script, blanks and all, as though she had been hypnotized. She had no reasonable explanation for why each of the witnesses she named denies ever being at such a party….. ”

        ______________

        Ford is damaged goods, yes. But who has she damaged in her present and past. No sympathy.

        Like

        • V says:

          Let’s hear from her research human guinea pigs. What ages were they? Was it part of CIA mind control – behavior modification human experimentation at Stanford?

          Like

          • V says:

            Pull the string and you will find a nest of snakes going back to the 50s with LSD experimentation on subjects at Stanford, and much worse atrocities funded and pushed by the CIA.

            Like

  30. Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

    Democrats’ bloodthirsty attack mission completed.
    However, they shall not like how this story ends.

    Liked by 1 person

    • V says:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mazie_Hirono

      Interesting – born in Japan 1947.
      One can speculate who she was in her previous life. These evil low-lifes carry their crimes from past lives with them, till the weight of it finally drops ’em like a rock into non-existence.

      Moved to Hawaii in 1955.
      Naturalized U.S. citizen in 1959
      B.A. degree in psychology – that explains it….
      J.D. degree in 1978, Georgetown University

      Running for re-election in 2018

      Like

  31. Donzo says:

    I enjoyed the delicious irony of watching Feinstein trying to defend herself against a charge she cannot disprove -the charge of leaking the accusation to the media. Of course she leaked it snake that she is.

    Liked by 2 people

  32. Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

    Waiting to verify but was recently reported that democrat Senator Manchin indicated that after today’s hearing he will vote for confirmation of Judge Kavanaugh.

    Liked by 1 person

  33. This tweet was already posted. I’m posting to show 179,000 likes to this tweet. I think that’s the highest I’ve seen!

    Liked by 3 people

  34. RICHARD CANARY says:

    Concerning Ms. Ford’s claims that she discussed this in 2012 with her therapist, it is important to note that she can lie through her teeth and her therapist can say nothing about it. Ford pulled these kinds of stunts repeatedly, by making claims that either have no possible proof to lies that she gets caught in, such as her claims that she doesn’t use airplanes for trave, when in fact she does use them for vacations, and other uses, including flying to the meetings where she was testifying.

    She proved to be quite the liar, but she was much better at presenting her lies than I ever would have thought possible.

    Put it all together and we have a psycopathic liar who cannot keep her lies straight and coordinated, thereby allowing one lie to upset another, multiplied several times, just in the short time she spoke.

    Now it all boils down to the loyalty of the GOP senators to America, which, frankly, scares the crap out of me!

    Liked by 3 people

  35. Edm says:

    If she “escaped” and ran away, who did she ask to drive her home? Did she hitchhike? If she asked someone, how did she not tell the person since she was so frightened. She had to go back downstairs to ask, or call someone…or hitchhike. How can she remember the kids there and not remember who drove her. I truly want to believe her but there are too many blanks.

    Liked by 1 person

  36. Donzo says:

    There ought to be some effort by Republicans to change the committee rules to avoid this type of situation.

    Liked by 1 person

  37. Ditch Mitch says:

    Lou Dobbs just reported that Repubs are out of their splinter meeting and committee will vote tomorrow morning. DiGenova stated that 11 Repubs will vote out of committee.

    Like

  38. Pasaran says:

    BTW, I didn’t understand how so many said here Ford had a “baby voice”. All I heared was an annoying gravel voice obviously forced. I hope american babies don’t have really those voices^^

    PS :you are lucky in the US : in France, ALL the medias take the Ford’s side.All. I live in a deep blue state and there is no red state to relocate 😦

    PPS : more and more, I think secession is a good path for USA. You couldn’t reasonably live with those ugly antifa/leftist/liers/antiwhite antimen/crazy egalitarian haters. BUILD A WALL… around California and Chicago !

    Like

  39. Kitten says:

    She stated she went upstairs to use the restroom….but almost every two story home has a bathroom downstairs..
    Maybe it’s nothing but just thought I would throw it out there.

    Like

  40. Mark Mears says:

    Someone should have asked her if she ever broke into a house to have a party? Everyone she named says it wasn’t their house and it never happened.

    Liked by 1 person

  41. USA Citizen says:

    Professor Christine Blasey Ford is a very troubled woman. There is a very reliable
    source indicating that she has mental problems and it’s pretty obvious when she was
    testifying that she couldn’t remember what happened a week before and her lawyer
    had to keep showing her the dates. This woman is in no shape to testify, and it has
    to do with her marriage, not what she thinks happened to her 36 years ago. She
    couldn’t remember when this happened or where it happened and even her best friend
    stated that this never happened to Professor Christine Blasey Ford, because she would
    have known it and remembered it. This is what the evil, crooked Democrats did to
    this pathetic woman regardless of her condition, only to ruin Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

    Like

  42. USA Citizen says:

    I believe Christine Blasey Ford is a liar for the Democrat party to destroy Judge Brett
    Kavanaugh. No one knows about her. They haven’t even investigated her. It’s time to do
    this and get to the truth about Professor Christine Blasey Ford.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s