Chairman Grassley Schedules Committee Vote Friday Morning For SCOTUS Nominee….

There is still no reason to believe accuser Christine Blasey-Ford will appear for a Thursday hearing to review her sketchy allegations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

Ranking Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein stated she was unsure if Ms. Ford will appear to deliver sworn testimony.

With Ms. Ford’s attendance still in question, Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley is using regular order to schedule a judiciary committee vote on Friday morning.  The committee vote is not mandatory, but generally following procedures.  This would set up a full Senate vote to confirm Judge Kavanaugh on Monday or Tuesday of next week.

(Via Politico) […]  Senate Republicans hired a female attorney to use as a questioner of Ford at Thursday’s high-stakes hearing on a sexual assault allegation against Kavanaugh but are declining to release her name.Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) told POLITICO on Tuesday that “we aren’t announcing the name for her safety.”

Asked if Republicans have received any indication of threats to the attorney they’re preparing to use, Grassley said: “I don’t know, but I guess we’re just being cautious.”  (more)

No more Mr. Nice Guy from Grassley:

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Government, Cultural Marxism, Decepticons, Dem Hypocrisy, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

747 Responses to Chairman Grassley Schedules Committee Vote Friday Morning For SCOTUS Nominee….

  1. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 10 people

  2. mr.piddles says:

    Looking forward to Thursday. Not looking forward to the aftermath with never-ending Kirsten Gillibrand shrieking soundbites. I don’t care. Call me a (Somewhat)Old White Sexist Male Pig — I PLEAD **GUILTY**, YOUR HONOR!!! I can’t listen to that shrieking hypocritical political opportunist shrieking for one second longer.

    Liked by 4 people

  3. jack says:

    Does the vote on Friday mean the R’s have the votes to nominate him (they took a tally) … up till now I know there were R’s that were not on board, so they delayed the vote.

    It also could be for Friday because Trump told the R’s to step up to the plate , and grow a pair.

    Main vote on monday or tuesday … should be interesting. I can’t see any R going against him, and expecting to survive the R backlash they would have to endure for years to come.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. jmclever says:

    This would be a dream job: Go through all footage of dems on all public hearings and news shows and make 30 second campaign commercials against them or maybe those 5 second ads that run in front of YouTube videos. Don’t wait till campaign season to use them. Just run them all the time like mosquitoes buzzing in their ears and constantly degrading their credibility in real time so that no amount of campaign funds could undo the perception (revealing their true selves in reality) created by the constant reminder of who the left is when they are not lying to get your votes.

    Im not all that swift on the technology, but I would be great at creativity and storyboarding.

    Liked by 7 people

  5. Dee says:

    I see Grassley gave himself cover. “POTENTIAL”

    Like

  6. MAGADJT says:

    Any other recent GOP POTUS we’ve had, would have crumpled and pulled the nomination faster than a top fuel dragster can go a 1/4 mile. This is what they were counting on, but the VSG didn’t play their game.

    Liked by 6 people

  7. The eerie thing in all of this is that the #fakenews is included in official Senate correspondence as if it somehow meant anything. In court, this is known as taking “judicial notice” of something, which in court is generally not permitted.

    It is far more dangerous that various branches of government take “official” (for lack of a more specific term that encompasses all branches) notice of what is published in globalist-owned mass-media.

    “All decent, reasonable men are horrified by the idea that the government might control the press. None of them seem concerned at all that the press might control the government.”

    Liked by 1 person

  8. retired IG says:

    All this stuff about Ford, and whatever the other woman’s name is has been enough already for me. I truly appreciate the moment I click on the link the “Last Refuge.” I try to read all the comments on articles of interest to me, and have posted what I wish here without censure.
    What a GENEROUS TREE with GREAT BRANCHES with so many outlying twigs that support hundreds and hundreds of us critters in the Treehouse. So happy to have a branch here.
    Thank you Sundance.
    If there indeed is a vote on Friday as per Grassley – every crybaby will be coming out of their closet to rant and rage~~ especially if the vote is in Kavanaugh’s favor. Until then,
    Treeper’s s get some rest. The universe is unfolding as it will.
    I love what our Great President is doing to shake up our financially, spiritually, and in many respects morally bankrupt nation. President Trump inherited this mess and he is doing his best. Believe he will guide us through. Nuff said.
    Be well Tweepers. “It’s only castles burning. Find someone who’s yearning. And you will come around. – Neil Young

    Liked by 3 people

  9. Mad As Hell says:

    Mr. Grassley has some explaining to do at the very bottom he says as you know false statements to the press does not constitute a criminal penalty. Hey if you yell fire in a crowded theater your going to jail why is yelling a false rape in news report not the same????

    Liked by 3 people

  10. Beverly says:

    The stars remind us that there is light and high beauty forever beyond the Enemy’s reach.

    Sleep well, my friends, and pray that the right may thrive.

    Like

  11. honestyoz says:

    If past experience is anything to go by, the 4 chan weaponised autists have just began on Avanti. This will be so good. Go KEK.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. dawg says:

    Andrew McCabe, meet bus.

    Listen to Rosey blame “career law enforcement official signing and vouching for the application, and if there are mistakes, there are consequences for them”

    Like

  13. HJR27 says:

    This entire episode in the American Justice system, if nothing else, has proven one again that, there are those like Diane Feinstein and her ilk that can attain and hold public office who are completely bereft of scruples or morales and still maintain a level of arrogance that only highlights the extreme stupidity of those who elect them.

    Like

  14. glk26 says:

    Just Bing “planned parenthood hit job on Kavanaugh in 2012”. Or go to Freerepublic.com to see when this started.

    Like

  15. glk26 says:

    2012 is when Mrs. Ford had her rape revelation.

    Like

  16. Ed says:

    I’m guessing she doesn’t show. This whole story is BS. So let’s if Susan Collins is a RINO, she can prove us wrong, but somehow I doubt she will.

    Like

  17. SJM says:

    NATIONAL REVIEW
    A Judicial Confirmation Hearing Is Not a Trial
    By ANDREW C. MCCARTHY
    September 26, 2018 6:30 AM

    FTA:

    Kavanaugh’s hearing has become a farce.

    I’ve never thought the big Ford–Kavanaugh hearing scheduled for Thursday would actually happen. Maybe I’ll be proved wrong, but I’ve never believed Christine Blasey Ford wants to testify. This hearing is not going to settle the issue of what, if anything, happened 36 years ago — which, as I’ve noted, is why there is no point in having the hearing.

    Senator Chuck Grassley, the Judiciary Committee chairman, should just invite affidavits from the witnesses and call it a day. Democrats, in any event, would rather have the specter of Ford’s testimony than the real thing, given that the latter will highlight: (a) her inability to recall and relate rudimentary details, (b) the fact that she did not utter a word about the alleged sexual assault for 30 years, (c) the discrepancies between her current version of events and the notes of what she told her therapist, and (d) the fact that the other witnesses she has identified do not corroborate her story. Moreover, now that Republicans have reportedly retained an experienced female litigator to conduct the questioning, there is no longer the prospect of video clips featuring Ford being grilled by old white guys — grist for what Democrats hoped would be their “War on Women 2.0” campaign ads.

    Ford’s legal team continues to add new demands. The latest is a push to have two “trauma experts” and Ford’s polygrapher testify. The purpose of these outlandish proposals is likely to prompt denials that would allow Ford to bow out of the hearing, blaming purported GOP intransigence and insensitivity.

    This underscores that the point of the hearing is being lost.

    A few days ago, when Democrats were demanding that the FBI be dispatched to investigate Ford’s nearly four-decade-old allegation, I pointed out:

    Even though the FBI had jurisdiction to conduct a background investigation of Kavanaugh, such investigations are not occasions to trigger full-blown criminal investigations of [alleged state] crimes the Justice Department has no jurisdiction to prosecute, but rather result in a flagging of allegations for the Senate’s consideration (which has been done here).

    The FBI inquiry into Judge Kavanaugh’s background is not a criminal investigation. The hearings attendant to the nomination are not intended to be a trial. Thursday’s hearing, supplementing the 31 hours of testimony Judge Kavanaugh has already provided, is not even, as he suggests, a forum for “clearing my name” — though he may understandably hope for that, just as one supposes that Ford hopes for some measure of vindication.

    That is simply not the point….MORE

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/09/kavanaugh-confirmation-hearings-not-a-trial/

    Like

  18. Gary says:

    This ‘choo-choo, here comes the rape train’ stuff sounds like it could have been a scene out of one of Stormies hundreds of porn flicks. I could imagine Avenatti saying something like that, but not Judge Kavanaugh.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. Is Jenny R. Yang the second accuser in the Supreme Court nomination fiasco?

    To keep the EEOC “tipped to the left”, Yang stayed on as Chief Commissioner after her term expired.

    She works for George Soros’ Open Society.

    She was Senior Trial Attorney for the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, Employment Litigation Section.

    https://brassballs.blog/home/is-jenny-yang-the-second-accuser-in-judge-brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-nomination-fiasco

    Like

  20. Kitten says:

    “Swetnick also claims she was drugged with Qualuudes or “something similar.” – ” from TGP

    mixed with alcohol .
    YOU WILL BLACK OUT. Period. Don’t ask me how I know. But I know and yea bad stuff happens but you won’t remember one bit of it. Don’t ask me about that either.
    The only way you wouldn’t black out is if your body was so use to this substance being in your body that it became tolerant of it. That means you stayed in a constant drunken stupor 24/7

    Liked by 2 people

    • Kitten says:

      What I am getting at is that if this was a one time deal…she would remember nothing of any events between time she took it until she came to. The only way she would is if she was a regular user of this combination.

      Liked by 2 people

      • wow says:

        She also states that she went too nine other “rape train” parties. That alone should damage her credibility beyond repair. She should be checked in to a mental health facility asap! Truly this is a Twilight Episode.

        Liked by 4 people

    • sysconfig says:

      NJ Quinlan case in the 70s….she went comatose..and died..The drugs now available like the truth serum scopalamine..will leave you in a state of suggestion that you will empty out your atms ..and not remember a thing what happened..total memory erasure..then normal..with some confusion..thats the date rape drug..bars pubs and nightclubs are not places to go alone..whether male or female..

      Liked by 1 person

  21. Anonymous says:

    Only Democrats’ agenda matters.

    Liked by 5 people

    • Sunsettommy says:

      Here is his Calendar for summer of 1982 in full detail showing little possibility he was ever involved with Dr. Ford:

      Here’s what Brett Kavanaugh’s 1982 calendar shows us

      https://nypost.com/2018/09/26/heres-what-brett-kavanaughs-1982-calendar-shows-us/

      Liked by 1 person

    • USTerminator says:

      There will be 10 more women coming out accusing Kavanaugh of sex crimes by weekend. This is liberal end game. They are lying but make up by number. If many people lie then it must be true.

      Like

      • ethicall says:

        You are right. My plea during this insanity, including for myself, is for everyone to slow down. Take a deep breath. Do a careful read of the allegations made against Kavanaugh. On their own the charges leveled by Ford, Ramirez and Swetnick do not pass the smell test. Believe your nose. This book review of ‘We Believe The Children’, published in the Washington Post, reminds us of what a rush to judgement looks like. Let’s not make the same mistake.

        The book is about the McMartin witch hunt in California and another case in Washington State. Child sexual abuse charges that turned out to be the most outrageous instance of false allegations in history. Eventually revealed as un-true or outright lies but not before they destroyed the lives of many people. In spite of the very specific details provided by the children and parents, the stories of sexual abuse were so unbelievable, on their face, that they should have never been entertained past an initial review. The inconsistencies from child to child were stark. There were red flags everywhere. But rabid crowds were marching around with “We believe the children” signs demanding “justice”, law enforcement felt pressured. Sound familiar? (“Believe women” “Believe victims” “We believe Dr. Ford” “We believe survivors”) The mob viciously attacked the accused before any trial. There was no presumption of innocence. Sound familiar again? (“Denial is not a defense” “Senators, get Brett’s penis out of our faces” “No Kavanaugh” “Rapist Kavanaugh”) In the child sex abuse cases there were some law enforcement and CPS officers who had an agenda, notoriety or a promotion. The Democrats have an agenda. Delay the vote and keep Kavanaugh off the Supreme Court. Some police and CPS investigators just lost all ability to do their job because of the circus going on all around them. Same thing today. (Confirmation hearings interrupted hundreds of times by anti-fa protestors, In spite of having the allegation from Ford for six weeks Fienstein waits to release it until after the confirmation process is over in order to create the most damage and chaos (happy now?), Yale law students stage sit in, Senator Cruz is forced out of a restaurant by anti-fa because he supports Kavanaugh)

        ‘How the daycare child abuse hysteria of the 1980s became a witch hunt’
        By Maura Casey July 31, 2015

        WE BELIEVE THE CHILDREN
        A Moral Panic in the 1980s By Richard Beck

        Like

  22. I have to wonder if the release of Julie Sweatnick’s affidavit by sleazy porn-lawyer Michael Avenatti will affect Chuck Grassley’s decision to call a Committee vote on Friday?

    At this point it’s unclear if Swetnick is the woman that 4chan referred to when (someone?) they claimed to have lured/catfished Avenatti into offering money for allegations against Kavanaugh.

    Like

    • Sunsettommy says:

      Strongly doubt it because the SECOND accuser has already been shown to be unsupported by anyone and even she admits that she isn’t sure it was Kavanaugh who swung the penis around in her face. Since Grassley already said NO to allowing the delay for that second accuser, he will just IGNORE the third accuser completely.

      Like

    • Anonymous says:

      Apparently, it’s about drugging and gang-raping women. Dang, how much “sexual misconduct” can a guy who stayed a virgin until he met his wife be expected to perpetrate?

      Liked by 1 person

      • mugzey302 says:

        Feinstein and her band of feminazis DO NOT want Kavanaugh confirmed because of his faith, and because they must protect their holy grail of abortion. It’s no wonder they behave like lunatics with no moral character, their only “god” demands blood sacrifice of babies.

        Like

        • Lady Sid says:

          I’ve been looking at the “Feinstein letter,” the one supposedly written by Christine Blasey Ford, Ph.D. accusing Brett Kavanaugh of assaulting her when they were in high school. All sorts of grammar and usage issues with it, but the biggest problem I noticed — it’s staring us in the face — is that the thing is UNSIGNED! No wonder Sen. Feinstein would not release it until the other day! Wonder if they asked Chrissy in the lie detector part of her investigation if she wrote the letter. If so, why not sign it? If she didn’t write it why is her name at the bottom of the page? Does this keep her from perjuring herself in the hearing? “Oh, that. Well, I didn’t sign it, did I?” This is truly weird s%^&!

          Like

        • Anonymous says:

          Democrats suck… party of un-American leftist weasels. (Vote GOP in Nov!)

          Like

  23. renzi2018 says:

    Looks like Grassley found staff who could draft a coherent letter.

    Like

    • renzi2018 says:

      And reminded him of his “poor me” comment during the hearings “that if the Chairman doesnt run the committee, the committee will run him”.

      Like

  24. Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

    At this point all accusers can take their complaints to the proper authorities because the US Senate has no obligation to entertain their farfetched stories. Committee hearings vote will be on Friday as scheduled and the full Senate vote will come next week sometime. Judge Kavanaugh will join the other Justices a few days after the Supreme Court reconvenes on Monday.

    M A G A ~~ VOTE ~~ GOP

    Liked by 2 people

  25. John says:

    It is time to vote and confirm Judge Kavanaugh!! Ford is a fraud and a phony!

    Liked by 1 person

  26. Bendix says:

    Maybe Ford and her husband were in counseling because of her lying and confabulating issues.

    Like

  27. Just Beachy says:

    Typical dem plan B: Ford and Ramirez not going as planned? Time to trot out someone with no credibility left to lose: Avenatti. He is more than likely looking for cable news interview offers to stay relevant and get paid.

    Like

    • USTerminator says:

      There will be 10 more women coming out accusing Kavanaugh of sex crimes by weekend. This is liberal end game. They are lying but make up by number. If many people lie then it must be true.

      Like

  28. TwoLaine says:

    Ms. Sweaty Balls can’t remember when her alleged “rape” happened either. Creepy Porn lawyer’s latest scumball client, ready to sell her Pussy Hat soul to the Pussy Hat party apparently also has early onset dementia.

    https://sc.cnbcfm.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/editorialfiles/2018/09/26/swetnickstatement.pdf

    Once again, as I said with the other TDS Pussy Hats, I will start to take this new Ms. Sweaty Balls seriously when she shows us the Police Report.

    Like

    • TwoLaine says:

      BTW, there are no witnesses to this alleged declaration. Creepy Porn Lawyer must be slipping.

      Like

    • VegasGuy says:

      One glaring problem with this new accuser is that she is 2 years OLDER than Kavanaugh… She is purported to being 55, Kavanaugh to be 53…

      She claims to have been at parties in 1980 -1981 which would make her 17 -18 at that time (she is 55 ..Born 1963? …entered College at 17?,,equates to 1980-1981?). Kavanaugh would have been 15 – 16 at the same time according to her timeline….

      She then goes on to claim that she was at parties with Kavanaugh through 1983 which would make her 21 – 22 & still attending these so called parties??

      Second glaring issue is that she says she was aware of girls being taken advantage of & then she says she herself becomes a victim? Not too bright huh? Also doesn’t quite say when that victimization actually takes place.

      An Avernati “hit job” with accusations as false as …well…Stormys “enhancements”, shall I say & leave it at that…..

      Oh & quite a listing of the new accusers “credentials”…LOL As if that adds credence to her claims…..NOT.

      Liked by 1 person

      • flyover says:

        Thank you, VegasGuy, you read my mind about the age thing! Swetnick graduated from high school in 1980 – three years before Kavanaugh! What 20 (almost 21) year old woman would be hanging out at high school parties when she has been able to drink legally in DC since the age of 18? Wouldn’t a woman find these boys to be insufferably childish and prefer visiting the cool clubs (and college parties) instead?

        Like

        • jbowen82 says:

          If any of these men were below the age of consent, she would be admitting to statutory rape. I think I saw this episode of SVU.

          Liked by 1 person

        • VegasGuy says:

          Flyover you are right….The age issue is a sticking point for me, especially with the added points you make regarding someone her age being interested in younger men. UNLESS she herself is a bit deviant and into kinky sex. She herself claims that she was at 10 parties where really deviant behavior took place & not only did she not say anything or report anything (which is IMO prima facia evidence of tact approval of the acts), but then claims the very thing happens to HER & now she is outraged…. A bit demented thought process there IMO.

          Also. & IMO this is an important item…. she should be the one to be concerned if she truly has or had security clearances since her background checks would have included those very years she outlines & what…? Nothing surfaces??Inquires to friends show no erratic (or erotic) behaviors in her past yet she claims now a clear outline of certain deviant behaviors on her part…? Wild sex parties, drugging & taking advantage of young girls, and multiple sexual assaults witnessed by her but never reported.

          Sounds like a case of potentially lying to the FBI regarding issues in her past in order to obtain security clearances huh? MAYBE an FBI investigation is warranted into her prior vetting to determine if she lied to the FBI…LOL

          Like

      • TwoLaine says:

        Yes, a LOT of glaring issues and zero actual facts. Her alleged creds are longer than her list of facts, so I could care less about any of them.

        Like

    • churchladyiowa says:

      “Ms. Sweaty Balls” . . . love it! Or is she a female sweathog left over from “Welcome Back Kotter”???

      Liked by 1 person

  29. sysconfig says:

    what we are being given is a drug..called psyops and propaganda..the 1st witness ford was so bad…they had to drum up more to demonstrate a pattern…they leave your imagination to do fill in rest…the more fantastic the better..Fords handlers wanted to make sure it was after the Cosby sentencing so people could subconsciously link Brett and americas favorite daddy..
    I’m keeping my eye on Grassley and Graham….and didnt Trump say this could have been done 2 weeks ago..that’s why he is calling it a con.He’s watching it too..

    Liked by 2 people

  30. Anonymous says:

    If Democrats can smear a guy who stayed a virgin until marriage with a high school sex scandal, then no American is safe.

    Liked by 4 people

  31. Well, well, well………..

    Just reported on Fox that Dr. Ford, who has had to turn over any corroborating evidence to her 36 year old allegations to the judiciary committee, did not produce the therapist notes from 2012 she said existed as proof that she mentioned the alleged attack years earlier in couples therapy, even though Kavanaugh’s name was not mentioned.

    So if this is true, she even lied about the therapist notes she claimed to have from 2012! And there’s no chance she was assaulted and mistakenly thinks it’s Kavanaugh. She just flat out made up the story as part of the Resistance last stand to preventing him from getting on the SC. These people are sick and there must be severe legal repercussions for their actions that have affected the country and the process by which our govt. is run.

    Liked by 1 person

    • dagnyshrug says:

      Even the polygraph test she says she took and passed is suspect. We don’t know what questions were asked, and dems will not release them. For all we know she could have been questioned about a trip to the zoo.

      Like

      • Lady Sid says:

        Apologies for repeating my post above, but the letter “sent” to Sen. Feinstein that she sat on for several months is UNSIGNED. There is no signature at the bottom where Christine Blasey’s name appears. So . . . did the folks running the polygraph ask her about this? I guess no perjury if she says she didn’t write THAT particular letter, right?

        Like

  32. dagnyshrug says:

    Ford wanted to testify last, which would deny Judge Kavanaugh the opportunity to defend himself against the live, sworn testimony of his accuser. She has been rightly scheduled to testify first. If Ford doesn’t show up and Kavanaugh testifies regardless, Ford will refute his testimony in the press, while never having been present, put under oath, nor questioned at all. This will effectively accomplish everything she demanded.

    Like

  33. H&HC, 2nd - 16th says:

    I trust Senators Collins and Murkowski are the religious type because they ought to be praying that just before the votes on their NEXT RE-ELECTION bid, their Democrat opponents do not produce people who were minors “at the time” that claim the Senators sexually abused them! It would be a new Democrat twist if their alleged victims were females. Ha-ha-ha. You ladies can reap what you sow.

    Liked by 1 person

  34. pnj01 says:

    Probably the scummiest thing about the Democrats’ behavior on the Judiciary Committee is the way they can turn on a dime by first alleging that “old white men” shouldn’t be allowed to question a woman claiming rape (or at least sexual abuse), but as soon as the Republicans say: “okay we’ll give you a vaginaed questioner…” the Dems shout about how it should be the old white guys and not a vaginaed attorney who does the questioning. And, of course, the scummiest thing inside that exchange is the racism, ageism and sexism inherent in that phrase “old white men….”

    Old white men are the people who fought and died on Utah and Omaha Beaches, and built most of the edifice of Western Culture (except for such things as Rap Music and the Vagina Monologues). It wasn’t vaginaed soldiers who did the dying on June 6, 1944 and for months thereafter. Not many blacks either (except for the oft-filmed Bufalo Soldiers and Tuskegee Airmen, of course). Sure, some were Hispanic but that is before politicians decided that they could bribe a growing segment of the white population by considering them something different.

    Now, though, recognizing that white men would always be a minority, the Democrats have decided to make them the cause of every victim fantasy that the “coalition” of victims the Dems try to put together. “White men” have done nothing good for our country supposedly nor the world at large. What prompted me to write this comment was listening to the glorious music of the Nutcracker’s Pas de Deux. A white guy did that but in the eyes of the Gillibrands, Maisie “Shut Up Men” Hirono, Viet Vet Blumenthal, UpChuck and other haters in the Democrat Party, Pyotr Tchaikovsky was probably a “train rapist” just like the obvious predator named Kavanaugh whom they’d save us from. Of course, had Trump nominated a black conservative, Gillibrand and the other scummy Democrats would just have made up another set of lies. That is what they do.

    Liked by 1 person

  35. Jan says:

    Isn’t this really what is all about with Ford?
    “She didn’t always get along with her parents because of differing political views,” Russell Ford said. “It was a very male-dominated environment. Everyone was interested in what’s going on with the men, and the women are sidelined, and she didn’t get the attention or respect she felt she deserved.” (Mercury News)

    Like

  36. TwoLaine says:

    I think there should be a Police room set up next to the Accusers room tomorrow. The Accusers can be sent to the Police room 1st to file their Police complaints. Once those are all completed, they can bring them next door and testify. No Police Report, No Testimony.

    Kinda’ like us little people are required to do, you know, laws and all that usual crap, without all the special petty Snowflake security and other “required/negotiated” perks.

    No outside camera’s, cell phones, or computer cameras are allowed into the Police room either. If a big, burly Police Officer needs to read them the riot act for filing a false police report, the Police can tape anything they want.

    BTW, did they request Craft services for tomorrow too?

    Like

    • Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

      It has been reported that Senator Grassley is now being escorted by two Capitol Police officers as he makes his way around Capitol Hill.

      Like

      • Lester Smith says:

        The time line for third woman does not match. She would of been in college not in high school during time frame of aledge crimes. The judge would of been in high school. Also she would of been an adult and didn’t report it and attended 10 of these sex parties and never told these younger girls not to stay? And she went 10 times to parties and keep going to party after party really. So she has had multiple back ground checks and the judge has had multiple back ground checks and the fbi didn’t find anything? It does not add up. Time line, multiple back ground checks and going back 10 times to parties where sex crimes were happing? If these crimes did happen she was compliset to these illegal acts. She didn’t report these acts she was an adult college student and passed multiple back ground checks really.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Lester Smith says:

        The time line for third woman does not match. She would of been in college not in high school during time frame of aledge crimes. The judge would of been in high school. Also she would of been an adult and didn’t report it and attended 10 of these sex parties and never told these younger girls not to stay? And she went 10 times to parties and keep going to party after party really. So she has had multiple back ground checks and the judge has had multiple back ground checks and the fbi didn’t find anything? It does not add up. Time line, multiple back ground checks and going back 10 times to parties where sex crimes were happing? If these crimes did happen she was compliset to these illegal acts. She didn’t report these acts she was an adult college student and passed multiple back ground checks really.

        Like

  37. Gayle S says:

    Thomas Wictor is posting that media scubbed Swetnick employment at New York Life Ins. from resume. Avinatti also worked there. Did they have previous contact?

    Like

  38. throughthetreesdarkly says:

    1. Will Judge Kavanaugh be required to testify if psychologist Ford doesn’t appear?
    2. What’s to stop her from breezing in late after his testimony with a lame excuse for tardiness,demanding she be able to respond to his abject denials?

    Like

    • VegasGuy says:

      Ford has a very weak case of assault here. IMO very little of what she claims actually makes ANY sense…

      Only 6 people present, she claims she knows all of them, yet she can’t figure out whose house they were at.

      She gets pulled into an upstairs bedroom. Music is suddenly blaring. Was the music for the party being controlled from that bedroom?

      She is pinned to the bed, Never says if she attempted to fight back or if her hands/arms were also pinned.

      She attempts to scream & a hand is placed over her mouth. That accounts for both of Kavanaughs hands LOL.

      Yet. now with no available additional hands, he is attempting to disrobe her.

      She never says that Kavanaugh makes any verbal threats towards her that would be conclusive with a rape attempt.

      She says Judge was both encouraging (“Go for it”) & attempting to assist (yelling “Stop”)

      She frees herself & instead of going downstairs to safety where additional people were, she locks herself in an even more confined & venerable place…A bathroom.

      Kavanaugh & Judge do not attempt to extricate her but merely go back downstairs, laughing. to the party.

      She finally leaves the bathroom, quietly goes downstairs, (where nobody sees her) & just leaves the house.

      She makes her way home somehow. IMO if you were able to “make your way home” your mind should easily be able to determine from where you made you way home.

      Also, that statement lends itself to a fair certainty that “Home” was probably not very far from the party…

      I await answers from the hearing to see how far off I am with my gut instincts….LOL

      Like

  39. Lady Sid says:

    Guys, the Feinstein letter purportedly from Christine Blasey (Ford not named) accusing Brett Kavanaugh of assaulting her in high school is NOT signed by her. No wonder Feinstein would not release it until the other day. WTH?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s