The context and details of the Nowak murder case continue highlighting what cultural Marxism does in policing when combined with aggressive Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) demands.
The British publication Sunday Times (paywall) is now reporting that three days after the trial of Vickrum Digwa began; as the police began facing scrutiny and needed to get out in front of the massive public outrage that was coming toward them; the police wanted to produce a statement telling the public Nowak’s death wasn’t really their fault, they were trained to believe the voices of racial minorities over the voices of white people.
The police wanted to issue a statement essentially telling the public of their intent to clarify things once the trial was completed. [This sounds like “a guilty conscience.’] However, the prosecution team stopped the police from issuing any statement. This expanding context is making the issues within the U.K even more toxic and more explosive.
U.K Independent […] –Hampshire Police planned to put out a statement challenging “disinformation” during the trial of Henry Nowak’s killer, but were warned by the Crown Prosecution Service it could jeopardise the case.
It is understood there had been concern about online commentary and potential public disorder, so Hampshire Police sought the CPS’s views on issuing a message telling people it would address questions once proceedings were complete, according to The Sunday Times.
Prosecutors advised the force that it could risk impacting the “integrity” of the case against Vickrum Digwa. (more)
I still think the worst part of this legal dynamic was the judge in the case ruling the video taken by the killer as he murdered his victim was, “too disturbing to be shown” as evidence. The killer recorded himself doing the killing, and that evidence could not be shown to the jury because it was “too disturbing,” yet the jury was tasked with making a decision on whether the accused was guilty or not. Think about it. Beyond insane judicial logic.
The police never even handcuffed the murderer and now reports say, “Vickrum Digwa was carrying a knife when he arrived at a police station after being arrested for the murder of teenager Henry Nowak, it has emerged. Digwa, 23, was jailed for life last week and must serve a minimum of 21 years behind bars for killing 18-year-old Henry in Southampton in December.”
Everything about this case is just crazy and revealing how insane the British system of justice has become.
What a mess. Maybe they should have kept Britain British.
“The killer recorded himself doing the killing, and that evidence could not be shown to the jury because it was “too disturbing,” yet the jury was tasked with making a decision on whether the accused was guilty or not. ”
The UK is moving towards eliminating the trial-by-jury system, so I guess that “fixes the problem” identified here.
A jury by peers assumes assumes that they have something in common with the defendants.
I. understand that Britain does not recognize a right of armed defense. The supposed basis for the Sikh knife carry exception is the existence of a duty to defend righteousness.
It occurs to me that – with perhaps a few exceptions – everyone should enjoy the right to armed defense. Moreover it is not healthy for a society to bestow some superior right on a discrete minority when the issue involves preservation of life. Henry Nowak was murdered by someone who felt entitled and that native Brits were contemptible. British leaders and the “elite”cultivated that attitude. There is no easy fix.
From the website Sikh Verse: The Kirpan represents the Sikh’s duty to defend the weak, stand against injustice, and protect the innocent. The word Kirpan itself means “sword of mercy” (Kirpa = mercy, Aan = honor/dignity).
Yes, a simple video of a dying young man bleeding out on the ground would be disturbing.
What would be more disturbing to a supposed judge who decided the video was too disturbing to be shown?
Is it possible the perp video recorded himself torturing, kicking or otherwise abusing Nowak while he lay dying?
The pathetic UK government know what they have been ignoring for a very long time, and know they are sitting on a powder keg.
Another possible reason for them to hide the video is the proof of when the video was discovered would come out.
When did the police start actually looking at the killer as the killer? We know at least 3 days later they were going to blame the victim.
How long after that did they discover the video? Or is it possible the perp posted it somewhere, and only then did they become aware of it?
Imagine the result if the public became aware it was only discovered a week, ten days later when they finally started doing their job.
The murderer was from a protected class. The video was not too disturbing for the jury. It was to shield the killer.
I cannot stand to hear British speak, they sound like such pompous asses and to go along with that, sounds like a bunch of wusses.
Dingbat judges all over the world, to disturbing to be shown!
You really wonder how much longer can this continue.
Loren check your own accent. Many people cannot stand to hear American accents particularly that nasal whiny American woman speech. As well as the affected baby talk of many black Americans. Your prejudices are not what is important here.
Well Mimi, its like this if I checked my own accent, I would have a hard time knowing from where I originated from. Being I was born in California lived in Australia went to college in Oklahoma and was stationed in Japan, my accent is more than likely way-out there.
I dislike the whiney nasal women also and that baby talk from black Americans, more than likely uneducated speech.
I have no problem with the accents of England, Cockney Southern Rural Brummie Geordie Scouse and so on, but the one that gets me, the ‘Queens English’ as it is referred to by some as ‘BBC English’ or elite upper class the powerful privileged with prestige. Nothing to do with prejudice. These are the ones that have caused the United States a lot of grief over the centuries.
My favorite is when some Brits (led by Blair) had a campaign to write to Americans to tell them how to vote in a key race — against MAGA of course. The Americans were outragfed and one wrote back a pithy little commentary about British arrogance which concluded “I hope your earholes turn into arseholes and you shit on your shoulders”.
I’ve never been able to forget that one !
In the US, it’s NPR English. As a writer, I regret the loss of regional accents and colloquialisms in this thin linguistic soup.
Meanwhile, across the pond back here in the good ol’ US of A….Linked by our friends at TLD:
https://nypost.com/2026/06/07/us-news/mcdonalds-boss-rushed-to-icu-with-horrific-injuries-after-colleague-threw-scorching-hot-oil-over-him/
Worth the read…and prayers up as getting better from a burn is very painful…
He should sue McDonald’s for minimum $10M. Trips for punitive damages.
Trips should be triple.
I did not have to view the article to know the respective complexions of the individuals involved in the attack.
Every day since the trial ended brings new information that makes the police look worse and worse. This is where DEI and critical theory policing ends up: discrimination, injustice and self-serving.
The sun has set on the British empire.
Civil war may be the only way to change things at this point.
I’m sure there’s a few IRA alumni around to throw something together.
But Ireland must be freed first.
What all Ammericans must understand is that if we don’t maintain the conncept of EQUAL justice under the law, there is no justice at all.. The Brits, and much of the rest of Europe, have bought on to the concept that if minorities (read people of color) aren’t given special priveleges, their rights are somehow diminishhed. That concept centainly contributed to the death of Henry Nowak. White people conssidering a trip to the U.K. should certainly be concerned for their personal safety and security under the present circumstances.
Time for rogue judges and politicians to be handed over to the mob.