Gohmert and Desantis Discuss Strzok Testimony and Fallout…

Congressman Louie Gohmert (TX-01) talked to Brian Kilmeade, guest hosting for Tucker Carlson, on Fox News. He weighed in on his comments to FBI Agent Strzok today in a joint House Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing:


Additionally, Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) discusses questioning of FBI official Peter Strzok during his testimony on Capitol Hill.


This entry was posted in AG Jeff Sessions, Big Government, Clinton(s), Cold Anger, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Donald Trump, Election 2016, FBI, IG Report Clinton Investigation, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Spygate, Spying, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

381 Responses to Gohmert and Desantis Discuss Strzok Testimony and Fallout…

  1. chojun says:

    This Strzok guy is pretty crazy. His body language I hope is studied by someone.

    I watched almost the entire hearing. I couldn’t help but feel how scary it’d be if I were at the receiving end of an FBI interview with this guy at the other side of the table.

    Liked by 41 people

  2. fleporeblog says:

    Louie Gohmert was my hero today! Look at those pictures SD shared above. Study them for a few minutes. Louie Gohmert brought the Devil of out that creature today for Americans to see with their own eyes.

    Mr. Gohmert and the rest of the White Hats in the House, thank you 🙏 for doing incredible work today to have Satan show himself once and fore all. Our President and our country are grateful for what you did!

    Liked by 57 people

  3. Cankles Clinton says:

    Wow, Gohmert says Clinton’s 30k emails went to a foreign entity “not Russia” through hacking of her email server.

    Liked by 16 people

    • Sherri Young says:

      What happened with those 30k emails should have been the part that the country should have been talking about last night and today, not the rant or the responses.


  4. Borealis says:

    Joaquin Phoenix is going to study this testimony in preparation for his role as the Joker.

    Liked by 8 people

  5. covfefe999 says:

    Wow. I was listening to the hearing way more than watching it. Now I’m seeing these videos and photos of Smirky. I think he’s a psychopath. He’s like the political equivalent of Jim Jones or David Koresh.

    Liked by 12 people

    • LCSmom says:

      I was not able to watch the testimony but did check in at CTH frequently. I am watching the clips now, and his face and head movements in that last clip are very disturbing.

      I am a bit out of sorts seeing him make that very strange face and roll his eyes back into his head. It is a bit demonic, like he could turn his entire head around like in the exorcist.

      Liked by 10 people

    • wendy forward says:

      Check Thomas Wictor’s thread on Sztrok.

      Liked by 4 people

  6. covfefe999 says:

    I wonder what Joseph Burrow, Lisa Page’s husband, thinks of Peter Strzok. He’s probably thinking “she slept with this psycho?”

    Liked by 9 people

  7. jeans2nd says:

    Seeing evil elicits very strong reactions, in me anyway.
    This man, Strzock, is one of the worst reactions ever experienced.

    Liked by 12 people

  8. patrickhenrycensored says:

    Louie got so deep in Strzok’s azz, a dozen democrats screamed in pain.

    Liked by 32 people

  9. Mike says:

    Thanks once again SD for bringing attention to the fact that Gohmert brought out the fact the intelligence IG, TOLD STRZOK THAT HRC’s EMAIL HAD BEEN HACKED BY “FOREIGN ACTORS,”




    Of course don’t know this, but I suspect that Gohmert attacked “Peter’s” infidelity the way he did so Gohmert’s “outrageous” questioning would make even the rat media replay the exchange, thus reporting these important facts.

    Liked by 20 people

    • G. Combs says:

      Gohmert: You said earlier in this hearing you were concerned about a hostile foreign power affecting the election. Do you recall the former Intelligence Community Inspector General Chuck McCullough having an investigation into an anomaly found on Hillary Clinton’s emails?

      Let me refresh your memory. The Intelligence Community Inspector General Chuck McCullough sent his investigator Frank Rucker along with an IGIC attorney Janette McMillan to brief you and Dean Chapelle and two other FBI personnel who I won’t name at this time, about an anomaly they had found on Hillary Clinton’s emails that were going to the private unauthorized server that you were supposed to be investigating?

      Strzok: I remember meeting Mr. Rucker on either one or two occasions. I do not recall the specific content or discussions.

      Gohmert: Mr. Rucker reported to those of you, the four of you there, in the presence of the ICIG attorney, that they had found this anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list. It was a compartmentalized bit of information that was sending it to an unauthorized source. Do you recall that?

      Strozk: Sir, I don’t.

      Gohmert: He went on the explain it. And you didn’t say anything, you thanked him, you shook his hand. The problem is it was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia and from what you’ve said here, you did nothing more than nod and shake the man’s hand when you didn’t seem to be all that concerned about our national integrity of our election when it was involving Hillary Clinton. So the forensic examination was done by the ICIG — and they can document that — but you were given that information and you did nothing with it. And one of the things I found most egregious with Mr. Horowitz’s testimony, and — by the way Mr. Horowitz got a call four times from someone wanting to brief him about this, and he never returned the call.”http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/12/ig-clinton-foreign-emails/

      Stolen from phattcat says: @ July 12, 2018 at 7:18 pm

      Liked by 8 people

  10. kinthenorthwest says:

    James Woods hit the nail on the head again…

    Liked by 20 people

  11. jackphatz says:

    Liked by 13 people

  12. Marygrace Powers says:

    Foreign entity hacking Clinton’s server was most likely Pakistan. All roads
    lead back to the “Pakistani Mystery Man” as PDJT has noted several times.
    Clinton 1000% gave Imran Awan et al carte blanche for a price, which is
    why Strzok never bother to investigate as Gohmert stated.


    1:07 AM 04/19/2018
    Luke Rosiak and Wajid Ali Syed | Contributor

    FAISALABAD, Pakistan — The father of Imran Awan — an IT aide to Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz who investigators concluded made “unauthorized access” to House servers — transferred a USB drive to a Pakistani senator and former head of a Pakistani intelligence agency, the father’s ex-business partner, Rashid Minhas, alleged.

    Minhas told The Daily Caller News Foundation that Imran Awan’s father, Haji Ashraf Awan, was giving data to Pakistani official Rehman Malik, and that Imran bragged he had the power to “change the U.S. president.”


    Liked by 15 people

  13. G. Combs says:

    From https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1017555358925983745.html
    ThomasWictor: “….What’s there to talk about? The man is utterly insane.”

    Liked by 14 people

  14. vicschick says:

    Before I married my sweet husband, I dated a man who had been diagnosed with Narcissistic Personality Disorder. I did not know that at the time but let me tell you, they are definitely crazy makers. His ex-wife told me this news one night when he had dumped me for the umpteenth time. He was so abusive verbally it still makes me wonder what the hell was I thinking??? This Peter Strzok guy is EXACTLY like that crazy person I dated. As I watched his hearing, I knew this guy definitely has NPD. Straight up. He’s batshit crazy and I don’t say that lightly. He should be nowhere NEAR the FBI or any other governmental agency or in any position of power. He needs to be locked up, preferably after being tried for sedition and placed in solitary confinement.

    Liked by 14 people

    • westernwhere says:

      They are sweet, then they abuse you, then sweet again.

      You become addicted to the emotional rollercoaster, an addiction to the drugs manufactured by our emotional states. Oxytocin, adrenaline, cortisol probably.

      What a hell ride.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Therein lies the underlying rub with ANY “government”. The sick always seek to control the well while normalizing their insanity and demented perversions…

      This guy is the epitome of perverted corruption. His worst weakness is the very thing he believes is his strength. If we were to get most of those bassturds in the district of criminals under such stress their true faces would be quite similar- and I am talking UniParty.

      Liked by 3 people

  15. BobBoxBody says:

    I know myself and others have said this before, but Trump and Sessions know that ultimately this is a PR battle as much as a legal one. Look at the timing of this with Mulvaney talking about reforming/dismantling worthless government bureaus. They’re allowing these people to hang themselves before the court of public opinion. People are waking up to the kind of people that have been running our government and when all is said and done they will BEG Trump to dismantle this crap.

    And his reply will be: “If you want to fix this mess, you gotta vote for Republicans.”

    The Democrats aren’t going to have a blue. It’s going to be a tsunami of red. Their blood.

    Liked by 16 people

    • By then PDJT will be saying “If you want to fix this mess, you gotta vote for Trumplicans, not RINOs.”

      Well… at least I hope he will! The exodus so far isn’t nearly enough of those who are nothing but globalist puppets.

      But, damn it it is progress of the actual kind and I like it. A lot.

      Because Trump! 😉

      Liked by 1 person

  16. Republicanvet91 says:

    Can anyone explain why so much of the hearing seemed scripted? Specifically when Goodlatte was demanding Strzok answer Gowdy’s question and Nadler called a Point of Order?

    Both seemed to be reading their responses, which made it appear the whole hearing was scripted.


    • smartyjones1 says:

      No, it’s not scripted but each side has opportunities to make questions. It was the out of control objections and repeated efforts at stopping the questioning by the Democrats that was “out of order” so to speak.

      They were literally trying to stop the questioning of Strzok completely and very early on one Dem motioned to adjourn. Another motioned for a roll call vote. Part of it is to discourage Americans from watching.

      It won’t work as clips are now being cut, shared and discussed including here. There was almost never an actual “point of order.” They are listed in Roberts Rules. In almost every instance, the claimed “point of order” was nothing more than an interruption to stop questioning.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Republicanvet91 says:

        I’m aware of what the Democrats were trying to do, particularly with their attempts to interrupt and deflect with Points of Order. Again, specifically when Goodlatte was talking/ordering/demanding Strzok answer Gowdy’s question about how many he interviewed in the 8 day timeframe…

        Nadler tried interrupting with his Point of Order. Nadler appeared to be reading from a script.

        Goodlatte was responding, and also appeared to be reading from a script.

        It’s possible both were looking down while responding, but at one point, Goodlatte turned a page and continued reading.

        I understand specific questions they wanted to ask would have been written out, but the entire exchange between Goodlatte, Nadler and Strzok appeared as if they were just reading from scripts.

        The video I am talking about is in this tweet, starting at around 1:16. The appearance of reading from a script is Goodlatte at around 2:03 and seems much more obvious at the 2:40 mark.

        What’s pathetic about Strzok’s claim that he was instructed by the FBI to not answer Russia investigation questions….I’m sure the FBI instructed Strzok at some point on not being partisan or biased in his activities.

        …and possibly on not diddling the help.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Amy2 says:

          Just once when they were throwing out all their points of order I would like to have heard, “what are you guys afraid of?” or “Shelia; just shut up for once.”


  17. rsmith1776 says:

    Among all the actors on all sides in the contemporary political drama, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III must be the most disappointing.

    After all, from Democrats we don’t expect much. We know they behave as if they were gifted with no human soul at birth. We know they lie. We know they are cowards. We know they are haters.

    About Republicans like Ryan, Romney, the worst of them Traitor McCain we knew they were bad people. Not exactly how bad they are (they are worse than even we knew), but we knew.

    However, from Sessions we expected better. We admired his Southern manners and affected accent. We thought he was a gentleman. We liked his stance against illegal immigration in that period when few were taking it.

    What an incredible disappointment he proved to be. I expect he’ll be gone by December, if not one day after the November elections no matter how they turn.

    When this is over, when his ignominious cowardice and/or corruption will send him to the obscurity of a disgraced retirement, when his three children and six grandchildren will look at their father and grandfather with a silent grunt of reproach and a repressed tear of humiliation in their sad eyes…. perhaps then the cowardly old man will understand how he squandered the chance to be an Attorney General of the quality a unique President like Donald Trump was entitled to expect.

    Be gone, coward, be gone.

    Liked by 7 people

    • TarsTarkas says:

      There’s a lot of bumping and jostling going on behind the scenes that we don’t see, are not being allowed to see, and in the end may never see. It’s like a tied NCAA championship basketball game awaiting an inbounds pass with 1.5 seconds to go but with the lights out and with both the good guys and the bad guys holding down separate light switches. I think a lot of the players are not necessarily black hats or white hats but gray hats, self-interest and/or self-preservation being their foremost motive right now. I think the public theater we’re seeing is all aimed at the mid-terms. If the Republicans hold the House and increase their margin in the Senate, armed insurrection by #TheResistance is a strong possibility, as they will be out of other options to keep power/prevent the Swamp from being drained or at least somewhat dried out.


    • brschultz says:

      Well said… Sessions is a huge coward! Elmer Fudd of the Republican Party


    • The Devilbat says:

      Sessions cannot be fired until after the mid term elections as it would give fuel to the left and their controlled media. Nobody is ever fired before Christmas. It just isn’t done as it makes the person doing the firing look bad.

      My guess is that Sessions will use the excuse of poor heath to resign in January of 2019. He would likely to have been given the option to resign or be fired. All this of course depends if Sessions is really a loser or if he is part of a Trump master plan.


    • I’m totally positive you are in for a nice surprise.

      Yep. All you Sessions bashers really don’t know what you’re talking about, you just have instant gratification needs and expectations that aren’t being met on your time frame. IF proven incorrect, so be it… but, if not remember what you saw.

      The Art of The Master Troll.

      Because Trump.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Truthfilter says:

        Peter Strzok said today that he is not under investigation. This came as a surprise to the congressman who asked the question.

        Sessions and Huber are doing nothing in terms of draining the swamp.

        Liked by 1 person

        • David A says:

          They are not doing nothing.
          Everything else you say is rational and understandable, and likely correct. Yet just consider that everything you say is exactly how an investigation into the deep state would operate. For example in such a scenario Peter Strozk would NOT be sat down, told he is caught in all the crimes and then forced to cooperate. No, far better to leave all the players in play! Now please follow…

          Trump made certain FISA was continued. If there is ANY chance that the greatest undercover intelligence operation sting into the corrupt self-important rule the world Blackbeard statist deep state is real, then Strozk, Page, Mueller and others are ALL FISA TWO HOPPED, straight up to Obama and Soros, and the co-cospirator media clowns, etc…

          The fact that Strozk may not have known for certain that he is under investigation and is still employed is hopeful to this unlikely scenario…

          VSG President Trump’s calm demeanor and lack of decisive presidential action in this matter, as well as his own responsibility in hiring known black-hats like Mueller and likely Rosenstein as well, along with Sessions reputation as a silent no leaks operator, along with known to exist Grand Juries, or at least one Grand Jury credited to the ongoing Huber assignment, all are evidence in favor of this unlikely yet glorious scenario.

          Liked by 1 person

          • Amy2 says:

            Strzok may not personally be under investigation YET, but with the FISA investigation going on, he’s probably on the short list. Jordan’s questions were narrowing the field. Strzok seemed a little surprised by that question.


        • G. Combs says:

          “…Peter Strzok said today that he is not under investigation. …”

          And how in H would Strzok KNOW???

          The whole idea of secret investigations is to keep the criminal in the dark. AG Sessions has repeatedly said to Congress that he CAN NOT DISCUSS ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS!


      • Not Ideal says:

        Sundance basically has weighed in on Sessions at this point.

        Your last two paragraphs give you away. We won. You lost. See you in November.

        Liked by 1 person

      • rsmith1776 says:

        Come on now, it is not the “bashers” who make the old toothless, possibly corrupt coward what he is.

        Welcome to Reality!

        Liked by 1 person

      • spren says:

        Oh please! What about Gohmert revealing that Rosenstein has requested the names and assistance of three attorneys from each of the US Attorneys to vet Kavanaugh? Is Sessions recused from this decision as well, or is he giving Rosenstein free rein to exercise authority that is not anywhere within his power? Where is Sessions on this matter and why isn’t he throttling the little jerk? Whether Sessions is actually a good guy or a bad guy doesn’t change the obvious fact that he has been a colossal disappointment to those of us who expected him to have Trump’s back.

        Liked by 2 people

      • DanO64 says:



  18. TwoLaine says:

    John Soloman and Rudy G just blew the lid off the circular reporting on Laura Ingraham show.

    Liked by 4 people

  19. Snow White says:

    This guy is demonpossessed, mentally I’ll and evil. Scary that his type of people are in position of power and can destroy people’s lives. I hope he goes to the big house for life.

    Liked by 3 people

  20. simplewins says:

    Rudy and John Soloman on with Laura and its great.


  21. CNN_sucks says:

    Why the hell Sheila Lee Jackson is still In congress? Come on people send her home. She is a disgrace.

    Liked by 3 people

    • jbowen82 says:

      She is lodged into that district for life. It was created for Barbara Jordan, who was an icon, and filled after her by Mickey Leland, who died on a humanitarian mission to Ethiopia. Then along came Craig Washington, who had many ethical lapses (including renting his district office from his ex-wife in lieu of paying her spousal support). The stench got so bad that Washington was beat by She-Jack, a Houston city council member, in the D primary.. The rest is history.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Pyrran says:

        Sheila Jackass Lee
        A former Houston city council member…..from Queens, New York
        In other words, just another carpetbagger. Emphasis on the bag.

        Liked by 2 people

    • PaulM says:

      I think it’s accurate to say that she is representative of the people who keep her in power.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Check out her “stituents” dawg.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Sherri Young says:

      Another bad choice tried to primary her this year. Having interacted with him, She-Jack doesn’t seem so bad.


  22. jmclever says:

    What the heck is an “operational equity?”

    Liked by 2 people

  23. ezpz2 says:

    Ugh…Laura Ingraham tsk tsk tsked Rep Gohmert for that.

    Hey Laura, most of us disagree with you. I for one thought it was gold because it effectively hit at the very heart of Stro-zak’s.complere lack of credibility.

    Also, that it was unplanned, by Gohmert’s own words, shows. Gohmert’s courageous authenticity, a man with the courage of his convictions who will be intimidated by NO ONE!

    Liked by 9 people

  24. Strzok (Strock) is pictured in the link below working for President Clinton in 1996. Strzok was working in the joint Secret Service/CIA task force.


    Strzok was 26-years-old at the time. He has never confirmed that he attended the FBI Academy. His first affiliation with the FBI was in 2009. His resume is void of ever working for the FBI as a field agent.


    Liked by 4 people

  25. Binkser1 says:

    So Strzok and company are using the excuse that their reason for spying and investigating then candidate Trump was because they were concerned about foreign entities (in this case Russia) interfering in our election. But the IG sends an IG rep and IG attorney to Strzok with information about an anomaly in Clinton’s email server showing a foreign entity is receiving all but 4 of the emails on the Hags illegal server and there is no concern about that. Is it just me or does that blow up the whole “we were concerned about a foreign entity interfering in our election” excuse? And furthermore, doesn’t this show obvious bias in that Strzok only seemed concerned about and investigated Trumps possible involvement with foreign entities and not Clinton’s? Maybe I’m reading this wrong, as I’m not the most knowledgeable individual regarding these matters, so please any Treepers that need to correct me, please do

    Liked by 5 people

    • G. Combs says:

      Welcome to the insane world of the Marxists where reality does not matter. And no I am not kidding.

      The Philosophy Of Karl Marx

      “The philosophical bases of Marx’s thought were laid early and remained unchanged throughout his life. As a student, Marx accepted the philoso­phy of Hegel as the only sound and adequate explanation of the uni­verse…..
      Hegel accepted as real only that which existed in the mind. Objective phenomena and events were of no consequence; only the con­ceptions of them possessed by human minds were real. Ideas, not ob­jects, were the stuff of which the universe was made. The universe and all events therein existed and took place only in the mind, and any change was a change in ideas.…”

      Liked by 2 people

    • Give yourself credit, you aren’t reading it wrong.

      “Ironic” isn’t it?

      Yeah, it would be if we didn’t know the reason why… and that it was on purpose!


    • Amy2 says:

      Yes, and did Susan Rice’s stand down order work it’s way from the NSA to the FBI?


  26. ATheoK says:

    Strzok has trashed any possibility of immunity. Lies, refusals to cooperate kill immunity deals.

    Strzok looks like doofus dwarf, backed by the evil dwarves.

    I assume Strzok was under oath for his testimony and therefore subject to prosecution for every lie, misrepresentation and conflicting claims; including his “I wasn’t biased”, just prejudiced, vindictive and bigoted as hell.

    Liked by 3 people

  27. L4grasshopper says:

    Re: Mueller not asking Petey about his texting in his “exit interview”. Gross negligence. At a minimum, Mueller should have demanded from Petey the following:

    * How long were you texting your opinions about any political person, pro or con?
    * Who did you text with? 1 person? 5? 20?

    If Mueller seriously and honestly wanted to fumigate his team from “bias”, he should have been intensely concerned with how far and wide Petey’s poison had spread.

    Yet it appears he did not. I personally think that it a “tell” that he did not care.

    Liked by 2 people

  28. Ziiggii says:


    Liked by 1 person

  29. magatrump says:

    Pray Pray Pray for Justice my friends. Vote vote vote November. Red Wave!

    Liked by 3 people

  30. SalixVeridi says:

    This is one sociopathic man. He believes he ‘saved’ the nation by deliberate and conscious manipulation of laws that have been on the books for over 200 years. He despises the average American, we know this because along with his cohorts in crime, he believes Americans are full of it, that they are too stupid and Neanderthal to understand the complexities of our place in the world.

    He believes he is a savior.

    He is despicable. He not only is wrong in his assessments, but he is vile and evil for allowing the FBI under his watch become a vessel of deceit, hate, and manipulation. The Dems can continue to cheer him on, but for the rest of us, we saw who and what he was, and what he represents all too clearly.

    March on to the midterms, we have a job to do.

    Liked by 3 people

    • woohoowee says:

      Strzok fancies himself among the elite. Those who believe they’re our betters.

      Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. — C. S. Lewis

      Liked by 4 people

  31. ForGodandCountry says:


  32. trapper says:

    This isn’t Awan or the house servers or the DNC servers. I believe he is talking about her SecState server.

    Did everyone get that? According to Gohmert all except four of Hillary Clinton’s SecState emails, all 30,000 of them, “went to an address NOT on the distribution list” that was an unauthorized source and was a “foreign entity unrelated to Russia.” That is, her email was hacked and EVERYTHING was compromised while she was SecState. Everything she sent, and everything she received, was secretly forwarded so some foreign entity, and it was not Russia or related to Russia.

    So, which foreign intelligence service got all her emails? Who was it? It was NOT Russia. Who was it? Was that how Hezbollah was able to roll up CIA’s entire operation in Lebanon in 2011? Was she the source of the information that allowed the Benghazi attack? How many people got killed as a result of Hillary’s compromised email account? Or was it an accident at all?
    AND – this I find astounding- Kilmeade can’t get off the subject fast enough. He refuses to ask any follow up questions on it. Hot potato and he isn’t touching it. WTF?

    Liked by 4 people

    • woohoowee says:

      Wonder what was in the emails Othugo exchanged over Crooked’s server?


    • I read somewhere suggesting that her e-mail server may have been used by her as a “drop box” for the benefit of a foreign country or countries. If discovered, she could always claim that it was hacked and not intentional on her part.

      Liked by 2 people

      • spren says:

        I have always believed that it was a drop box, and used to give information in exchange for contributions to the Clinton Foundation. The Clinton’s have always been about pay to play going back to their Arkansas days. Their scam was especially explicit when Bill was president and they used their influence to sell our top secrets to the Chinese in exchange for campaign contributions. Their treason advanced the Chinese several decades in their military capabilities and we now find ourselves challenged by the Chinese as a result. All of this was standard operating procedure for the Clintons and all of America is at risk due to their malfeasance.

        Liked by 2 people

    • distracted2 says:

      Oh, yeah, I caught it. But I do think it was the Awans/Pakistan and that’s why the case has been completely swept under the rug. If it were not for Luke Rosiak, there would be zero reporting on it. And he continues to keep the story alive.

      There’s no other reason for that case to have essentially disappeared unless it involves Clinton and Obama sending classified email back and forth to one another while unwittingly sharing it with Pakistan.


    • Sherri Young says:

      Watch Kilmeade. He has a producer talking in his ear as soon as Louie starts to unload. They apparently had Louie on to talk about his rant and show the clip. Either they did not notice or did not want to talk about Hillary’s emails.


  33. trapper says:

    When Bill Preistap went to DC to head up the FBI’s counterintel office, his new boss was Andy McCabe, and his number two, who Preistap did NOT get to pick, was Strzok, who was already thick with McCabe. A little sympathy for BP?

    Liked by 1 person

  34. mashall says:

    How could Horowitz be conducting a true investigation by allowing Stzok to choose what emails/text to turn over to him?
    Horowitz only pointed out the corruption he couldn’t hide.
    Corrupt Bastard.

    Liked by 1 person

  35. FanGirl says:

    It will be difficult for Lisa Page to look worse in her public testimony. I wish they would park them next to each other for questioning.


    • Amy2 says:

      They need to get Lisa some glamour shots make up if I am going to have to watch any open testimony of her. Her texts alone already make her ugly to me. Yes, I’m bad.


  36. Rainy says:

    Bombardsbodylanguage.com should be doing a breakdown of this nasty liar. She did one on Rosenstiens last appearence.


  37. mashall says:

    I think public opinion has reached a level that PDJT can fire RR, Mueller or even Sessions and the Never Trumpers will not have the political will to try to impeach him. If public opinion is not there yet, it is rising by the day.
    Onward to Victiory!
    President Triumph!

    Liked by 1 person

  38. Carl says:

    Laura Ingraham said (paraphrasing) she didn’t think this was Louie’s finest moment, that the Republicans on the panel must have felt embarrassed. When she said that, I couldn’t believe what I was hearing! I thought Ghomert’s part was the best one of the day..sheesh, sometimes I wish Laura would just go home.

    Liked by 2 people

  39. simplewins says:

    Putnam sux. He was NOT a Trump supporter until the very end. He wont get my vote or anyone in my family.

    Liked by 3 people

  40. G3 says:

    Crystal Clear on who President Trump supports

    Liked by 4 people

  41. Johnny Bravo says:

    Why wasn’t Strzok asked, “if you were under investigation for a crime, what would your defense be if that person, heading up that investigation, had made declarations about you of a type you made about DJT?

    If Strzok responds with, “I’d accept that investigator did a fair job and appreciate the investigation was not tainted by bias in any way”, then lock him up, he’s definitely a loony tune needing separation from the rest of society!

    Liked by 1 person

  42. mr.piddles says:

    TBH more worried about the contingent on The Right than I am the The Left. The Left can’t get out of their own way. The Right has some serious Deep Staters sprinkled around the globe, not just some Goofy Sorosian Billionaire Commies. The Right is the official fox in the henhouse in this particular one act tragedy.


  43. rsmith1776 says:

    Why are you liking all your posts?


  44. lionslover says:

    Time to face the truth here folks, they have to have something on Trump or he would order all the documents turned over as he has the power to do. The excuse of his lawyers telling him not to just doesn’t cut it. Trump EASILY has the support of his supporters and most of the nation to order the release of all documents.

    Sessions has proven himself to be part of the deep state now and part of this coverup. I don’t believe anyone could be as dumb as he would really need to be in order to just sit while these conspirators go unpunished, yet that is exactly what he is doing.

    Hannity and a ton of other people, Nunes and a bunch of congress people are outright calling for Trump to simply order the release of the documents and it makes no sense that he won’t do it unless they have something on him, it just doesn’t.

    Trumo can stop ALL THESE EVIL PEOPLE and make sure they are held accountable and yet he won’t do it? WHY? There is no rational reason why his lawyers would tell him to sit on these docs and not allow these evil actors to be exposed.

    Folks, these people tried to overthrow and election and allowed Hillary to be judged with a different set of laws than the rest of us have to go by, PERIOD!!! I am now more disguted than ever because it is becoming very obvious that these traitors ARE GOING TO GET AWAY WITH THIS, CORRECT?

    Where is the million man march on Washigton by the people? If the people don’t set up a march for justice when we now KNOW 2 sets of laws are being used and our constitution has been shredded then I don’t know what we will march for.

    I can’t believe we are going to sit here and watch our country and constitution go down like this and do NOTHING to demand justice be done.

    I can’t deny this anymore, Trump CAN RELEASE THESE DOCS, HE CAN, and yet he won’t. Tone of people are calling for this and also a special prosecutor and yet Trump and Sessions simply refuse to do anything, something HAS TO be going on behind the scenes with this, it simply makes no sense anymore.

    Liked by 1 person

    • spren says:

      Nice try, troll. Trump can’t release the documents at this point for several reasons. First are the upcoming mid-terms. Second is he is trying to push his SCOTUS nominee to confirmation. Third, he is letting the process work itself out as it should.

      If things don’t go as they should then Trump will order the release of these documents. If any of these corrupt entities had something on Trump they would have already been leaked to their equally corrupt media cohorts. I call fraud on you.

      Liked by 2 people

      • lionslover says:

        Troll? NONSENSE, then you give reasons and explain NONE OF THEM? If Trump exposes these criminals we would CRUSH in the elections. 2nd excuse is also laughable, the judge will be confirmed, no way would the three dems vote against him, and what argument would ANYONE have against him releasing docs that the CONGRESS HAS AN OVERSIR=TE RIGHT TO SEE? The American people would be thrilled, not angry.

        And your 3rd excuse is even more ridiculous. Let is work itself out as it should? DUHHHHH, the congress has oversite and the doj is REFUSING to hand over dics that have been demanded, GIOT IT? The president has the power and the REASON to order the docs given to congress. The situation works itself out when the DOJ hands over the docs that have been demanded. So what’s the process when the doj REFISES TO HAND OVER the docs? DUUUH, the president ORDERS them handed over he is the head of the gov and has the power to see to it that congress is given EXACTLY what they have an oversite right to see, can you understand that?
        So lets see how smart you are, uh, so the DOJ keeps ON AND ON refusing to hand over the docs, duhhh, what happens then? Who holds them accountable? The impeachment nonsense won’t work because Sessions will need to act and he has already shown HE WON’T he already could have done numerous things to expose these criminals and he refuses to just like the doj REFUSES to hand over the docs.

        Your excuses are laughable. The docs will EXPOSE criminality and huge bias, THAT WILL WIN BIG TIME IN NOVEMBER, it would bring the dems to near complete RUIN.
        The president has the right and the power to demand the docs released, THAT IS WORKING IT OUT AS IT SHOULD BE, understand?


        • lionslover says:

          And your leaking statement is also nonsense. The obvious point was that they have something on Trump and they won’t leak it or expose it IF THEY DON’T GET EXPOSED AND FACE JAIL TIME, GET IT? They can’t leak their only leverage against Trump to keep him from exposing their crimes, that’s why ti wouldn’t be leaked. And it has ALRAEDY not gone as it was supposed to. The doj was SUPPOSED to hand over the docs, THEY HAVEN’T. Look at howthey held the “We’ll stop him” text until recently. Lord only knows what other mind blowing stuff is in the rest of the texts that is not being tunred over.


          • David A says:

            There is another possibility.
            They are not doing nothing.
            Everything else you say is rational and understandable, and likely correct. Yet just consider that everything you say is exactly how an investigation into the deep state would operate. For example in such a scenario Peter Strozk would NOT be sat down, told he is caught in all the crimes and then forced to cooperate. No, far better to leave all the players in play! Now please follow…

            Trump made certain FISA was continued. If there is ANY chance that the greatest undercover intelligence operation sting into the corrupt self-important rule the world Blackbeard statist deep state is real, then Strozk, Page, Mueller and others are ALL FISA TWO HOPPED, straight up to Obama and Soros, and the co-cospirator media clowns, etc…

            The fact that Strozk may not have known for certain that he is under investigation and is still employed is hopeful to this unlikely scenario…

            VSG President Trump’s calm demeanor and lack of decisive presidential action in this matter, as well as his own responsibility in hiring known black-hats like Mueller and likely Rosenstein as well, along with Sessions reputation as a silent no leaks operator, along with known to exist Grand Juries, or at least one Grand Jury credited to the ongoing Huber assignment, all are evidence in favor of this unlikely yet glorious scenario.

            Liked by 1 person

  45. anthohmy says:

    I thought they didn’t publicly admit to “ongoing investigations”.

    Liked by 1 person

  46. Here is a quick little photoshop I made…different stages of devil transformation for Peter Satan. MAGA!

    Liked by 2 people

  47. dickturpin1 says:

    Strzok looks a really spiteful, vindictive POS does he not?

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s