Supreme Court Upholds President Trump Travel Restrictions…

The Supreme Court has upheld President Trump travel restrictions and rejected the challenge to the Trump administration’s September 2017 travel ban. (full ruling pdf below). Response from the White House – Statement from the President Regarding Supreme Court Ruling:

Today’s Supreme Court ruling is a tremendous victory for the American People and the Constitution. The Supreme Court has upheld the clear authority of the President to defend the national security of the United States.

In this era of worldwide terrorism and extremist movements bent on harming innocent civilians, we must properly vet those coming into our country. This ruling is also a moment of profound vindication following months of hysterical commentary from the media and Democratic politicians who refuse to do what it takes to secure our border and our country.

As long as I am President, I will defend the sovereignty, safety, and security of the American People, and fight for an immigration system that serves the national interests of the United States and its citizens. Our country will always be safe, secure, and protected on my watch.  ~ President Donald Trump


This entry was posted in Death Threats, Decepticons, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Election 2018, Islam, Jihad, media bias, President Trump, Supreme Court, Transportation, Travel, Uncategorized, USA. Bookmark the permalink.

418 Responses to Supreme Court Upholds President Trump Travel Restrictions…

  1. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 10 people

  2. KBR says:

    So how many came here between Sept 2017 and June 2018?
    Will they be rounded up and deported now?
    Will 9th circuit have to pay costs of it?

    Liked by 24 people

  3. cowpokesblog says:

    That’s a bag of winamins..

    Liked by 12 people

  4. TMonroe says:

    One side speaks to the constitutional issues, the other speaks to what looks like unconstitutional activist ambitions legislating from the bench:,-rejects-discrimination-claim

    “Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a dissent that based on the evidence in the case “a reasonable observer would conclude that the Proclamation was motivated by anti-Muslim animus.” She said her colleagues arrived at the opposite result by “ignoring the facts, misconstruing our legal precedent, and turning a blind eye to the pain and suffering the Proclamation inflicts upon countless families and individuals, many of whom are United States citizens.”

    The ‘Proclamation’ could’ve been motivated by a bad cup of covfefe or the President’s once fighting over a girl with a guy named Chad, yet still been constitutional. The question is whether the order itself complied with existing US law and was formed consistently with the powers of the office, regardless of some Sherlockian divination of intent (just like the Comey discretionary tactics). The additional contention that her colleagues turned a blind eye to pain and suffering etc. is additionally sickening, as their job is not to weigh in there but on constitutionality. What a giveaway of their unconstitutional motivations and actions.

    Liked by 20 people

    • Southern Son says:

      It’s a giveaway that Sotomayor n Kagan were Never Qualified to make Decisions regarding Our most Sacred Document.
      Everything the Left views is through the lense of Ideallogy, not Constitutionality.
      I Pray Every day that they Go Down the Swamp Drain.

      Liked by 20 people

    • Maquis says:

      Hmmm… The order addressed the unknowable persons coming from only six of over fifty Islamic countries. Ascribing that to animus towards the Religion of Pieces is a serious math failure.

      Sotomayer is anything but wise.

      Liked by 5 people

    • Kintbury says:

      Someone should point out that when Anglicans and the Amish start burning down buildings and bombing sporting events, we will look at them. It must take hard work to be that stupid.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Human Being says:

      “Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a dissent that based on the evidence in the case “a reasonable observer/LATINA WOMAN WHO HAS LIVED THAT LIFE would conclude that the Proclamation was motivated by anti-Muslim animus.”

      Liked by 1 person

    • snarkybeach says:

      my local talk radio station has ABC news for the breaks. they went on and on describing the minority opinion, never mentioning the majority.


    • StanH says:

      “Feelings, whoa oh feelings…” This is what you get with: “a wise Latina woman.”

      Liked by 2 people

    • Me says:

      “She said her colleagues arrived at the opposite result by “ignoring the facts, misconstruing our legal precedent, and turning a blind eye to the pain and suffering the Proclamation inflicts upon countless families and individuals, many of whom are United States citizens.”
      Well if Sotomayor thinks her colleagues are shiteheads who are idiots, then she should step down. I don’t recall during her nomination and confirmation hearing her complain that the other justices were ones to ignore facts or misconstrue legal precedents. No, she only had the highest praise for the SC justices, wanted to be with them on the mountain. But now, they’re a bunch of fools according to her. Must suck at the cafeteria during lunch time.

      Liked by 1 person

    • USTerminator says:

      Show me where is in US Constitution say anything about “motivation”. What’s moran Justice who probably uses Constitution as her daily toilet paper! If this is “wise Latina woman” the imagine what “unwise Latina woman” would be.

      Liked by 1 person

      • covfefe_USA says:

        Actually, “latina woman” is redundant. If that’s the real quote, she’s even dumber than we thought.


      • Deb says:

        That’s all the left cares about, intentions. It’s why they are constantly virtue signaling, don’t want anyone to misconstrue their intentions.

        You could be a commie leader whose policies starve millions of people or who murders people in cold blood, but as long the left thinks you have good intentions they will worship you like a hero.


  5. Jack Dempsey says:

    Gratified to see this decision.
    Don’t believe that democrats will be discouraged by the defeat—-
    this is LAWFARE—–the fight/delay/hysteria IS the whole point.
    Trump has the stubbornness outlast this nonsense.

    Liked by 8 people

    • jmclever says:

      Lawfare only works when the courts are stacked with activist judges, and POTUS Trump is working to remedy that.Its only a matter of time to get back on track

      Liked by 6 people

  6. progpoker says:

    Liked by 11 people

    • Sentient says:

      “stand with Muslim communities around the world”
      Why should we pay any attention to any communities “around the world”? The US Constitution isn’t a suicide pact. Foreigners have no inherent right to come to the US. Period.

      Liked by 25 people

      • gda says:

        Wait, isn’t the first word in the ACLU, AMERICAN?

        Then again, the ol’ ACLU ain’t what it used to be. About as much credibility as the SPLC.

        Liked by 4 people

      • singingsoul says:

        Sentient says:
        “stand with Muslim communities around the world”
        Why should we pay any attention to any communities “around the world”? The US Constitution isn’t a suicide pact. Foreigners have no inherent right to come to the US. Period.”
        The American Constitution is for the American citizens not for illegals or people of other countries.
        I do not understand how the left feels that the American Constitution also caverns people who have their own laws by what they are governed by.
        I think the globalists got ahead of themselves and have implemented an idea and concept that the American Constitution applies and governs the world.
        I have to say there is an arrogance by some that American Constitution is established for the world. Who is preaching garbage like that I’ve League Universities with the UN..?

        Liked by 2 people

    • bessie2003 says:

      Amazing that ACLU is openly declaring allegiance to Islam, not surprised because they’ve spent the past few decades doing their best to use the law to erase Christianity. I’m just amazed that they feel secure in openly declaring their bias.

      Well done VSG-PDJT, just by being you people are outing their true faces.


      Liked by 8 people

    • Concerned Virginian says:

      Yeah, right.
      The ACLU is afraid of ISLAM and its commands to take over the entire world for Allah and establish Sharia Law and the Islamic fiqh to supersede the laws of all countries including the United States. The ACLU thinks that if they act like Dhimma and show “solidarity” with Islam, that somehow they’ll receive “merciful treatment” from Islam in any (GOD FORBID) future Caliphate that could include the United States.
      Except that the ACLU would be wrong on that train of thought.

      Liked by 5 people

    • alligatriot says:

      Dear ACLU,

      How admirable that you “… stand with Muslim communities around the world …”.

      Now, how about you go stand IN those Muslim communities for awhile and get back to us on whether in might be prudent to at least vet a few of those fine folks before they enter America.

      I’ll wait here.

      Liked by 14 people

  7. AmericaFirst says:

    We are definitely going to need at least one and hopefully two more actual law-abiders before the unConstitutional misinterpretation of the XIVth Amendment gifting the foreign national babies of foreign nationals born here with the coveted American citizenship is heard.

    Liked by 7 people

  8. MAGADJT says:

    Hope any USSC vacancies occur before 2020. Grassley says he won’t bring them up in committee since they did the same in 2016.

    Liked by 2 people

  9. Bonitabaycane says:

    Not all wins are created equal.

    This win was huuuge for POTUS and MAGA.

    Bigly win boys and girls. 🙂

    Liked by 13 people

  10. Pat Frederick says:

    just sent the President a congratulatory email for this win!

    Liked by 8 people

  11. Publius2016 says:

    Ok The Dissenting Opinions are truly breathtaking in their ignorance! Breyer looks at footnotes and frequently asked questions within State as if he’s an immigrant looking for entry to country! Sotomayor is defending Sharia Law 101! Little analysis on law and comparisons to prior Presidential Action that must now be curtailed against this President only!!

    Liked by 10 people

  12. fred5678 says:

    WINNING! And winners love other winners!! Now with SCOTUS confirming POTUS can control immigration, great time for a visit from like-minded folks

    POTUS is going to get along with Italy’s new PM just fine!! PM Conte and Deputy PM Salvini are the new coalition government — elected mainly on issue of immigration. POTUS has invited Conte for a WH visit — to celebrate saving Western Civilization??

    America and Italy (and Hungary, and Poland) are now both defending western civilization from the EU, the UN, and Soros. Add Obama and Hillary to that list for bombing the shiite out of Libya, leaving it in shambles for use as a handy embarkation dock.

    Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini Salvini, who leads the Lega party which forms one half of Italy’s new populist coalition government, acts as its minister of the interior.

    His FIRST trip was to meet with Libya’s president to enforce Libya’s SOUTHERN border, to stop the flow of economic illegal migrants at the source.

    Too bad Mexico will now have a commie leader who will increase the country’s current promotion of the illegal flow from Central America through Mexico, into our country.

    Liked by 7 people

  13. The Tide Is Turning. The Reckoning is Coming. I am glad I lived to see these days.

    Liked by 8 people

  14. Bonitabaycane says:

    “As long as I am President, I will defend the sovereignty, safety, and security of the American People, and fight for an immigration system that serves the national interests of the United States and its citizens. Our country will always be safe, secure, and protected on my watch.” ~ President Donald Trump comments on ruling

    Thank you Mr. President!

    Liked by 10 people

  15. moe grimm says:

    To be honest, I haven’t finished reading this and won’t until after work tonight. Besides this decision which under a strict, read absolute, interpretation of what’s clearly stated in the U.S. Constitution is the fact it handed down as (5) to (4)FOUR. Ginsburg (one of S.C. leftist shrikes) who prefers S. Africa’s constitution over “her own” (anybody following how it’s going in the former colonial African countries?), Sotomayor, Breyer, Kagan. 4 to go.

    Liked by 5 people

    • Maquis says:

      African Colonialism was a failure. It never should have started, or never should have ended.

      It gave Africans a voice in the World, literally, by gifting them with language, maybe not a single language, a couple few, but so much more effective than the many thousands of tribal languages that isolated them from even each other.

      The gift of Christianity began the reduction and elimination of myriad brutal superstitions and savageries, and initiated the contemplation of Man as more than an animal or commodity.

      Western Culture helped them see beyond the myopic tribalism of the ancestors, and gave them the tools to elevate their societies and Human Rights.

      Don’t even get me started on technology!

      Sadly, these gifts have been squandered. Some failed to take root, most are too shallowly rooted to survive the absence of the European caretakers. All have withered since de-colonization.

      Having considerable personal experience with transplanted Africans that idealize and long for the blissful days of living in filthy huts, unaware of Civilization and its blessings, while cognizant of the savagery that then prevailed, it’s hard to be at all sure they ever could stand shoulder to shoulder with the rest of the World.

      It is certain, sadly, that leaving them to their own devices, with some of the trappings of modernity but none of its soul, has been disasterous for Africa. Not to mention the World.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Sandra-VA says:

        I find this post to be rather elitist, tbh.


        • Maquis says:

          Without my expetiences over the past forty years, especialy the past dozen, I would likely perceive it that way as well.

          We serve no person denying the realities that plague them. Especially when their own characteristics, behaviors, and choices are that which afflict them.

          Refusing to speak uncomfortable truths merely fortifies the prison so many peoples inhabit. That is even more destructive when it is couched as kindness, and when those that long for their release are demeaned as elitist.


      • gda says:

        It isn’t soul they are lacking, it’s IQ.

        And the elites, the high IQ among them, are leaving (or have left) Africa in droves, causing a brain-drain in a continent that can ill afford it.

        In fact, colonialism was the best thing that ever happened to Africa, and independence the worst, because it decapitated the progress made under colonialism.

        I speak as someone who grew up in a majority black country in the 50’s and 60’s, experiencing the effects of both colonialism and the “independence” (from Britain) which followed.


        • Maquis says:

          Sadly true on the IQ front, as well as regards an all too low capacity for self-control and the tendency for violence.

          I not would in the least assert they have no soul, or that it’s inferior. I meant literally as I said, they possess the trappings of modernity, yet none of soul of modernity. Which encompasses Human Rights, Tolerance, an animated desire to advance the well-being of self and others, a sense of duty and obligation that transcends tribe and embraces ideals and values founded on something much greater than mere self-interest, a culture of creativity, of arts and industry, and faith and hope and investment in the future of themselves their peoples.

          I’m sure the conception of modernity is much larger than the ideas I’ve cited, but those citations get to the core of what I have observed, amongst many others whom I’ve known and read.

          I do tend to agree that colonialism was a boon for Africa. Its interruption certainly a disaster. Seeing the destructive ends to which that truncated gift has been directed, I do feel it would have been better never begun, than ended so incredibly prematurely.

          I hope to hear more of your experiences in this vein someday. Sometimes it would be so great to chat in person with so many of the wonderful Treepers we meet here. To soak up other’s perspectives and stories and expand our window on this World and beyond.
          CTH rocks.



          • singingsoul says:

            I believe it was a mistake for Europeans to invade Africa and trying to make it their own. There also was a mistake bringing Christianity.
            I studied some Anthropology and I believe each continent has its own culture tat works for them. Why do we have to go around the world forcing our culture on others..?
            My brother was 11years in Botswana and he said we are now getting back what we have done to them. He was a missionary and regrets the damage that has been done to the culture of Africa. We do not like wen another culture is forced on us..?

            Liked by 1 person

            • Maquis says:

              Does your brother regret the damage he has done to Africa?

              Eleven years as a missionary and his conclusions reinforce yours that even the Humanizing teachings of Christianity were and are destructive to Africa? No disrespect intended in the least, I very much appreciate your perspective, but something does not compute.

              I’ve been considerably conflicted on the “better off left alone” idea for some time myself. It’s beyond indisputable that tremendous suffering occured and indefendable cruelties inflicted. I shudder at the very thought of them.

              The Europeans, seeing America blossom, thought they could replicate our success, but they neglected most of the ingredients of America’s recipe. They brought what we had abandoned.

              Yet, Africa, while saddled with borders artificial and conflict ridden, is a member of the Global community now. Not a very healthy contingent, but participating in dialogue and trade and commerce. In a position to step up their committment to the Human Family. Blessed with tremendous resources and riches, they could accomplish so much.
              So much more.

              Where would they be now otherwise? Would we have, should we have, could we have isolated that Continent?

              Islam didn’t. How long could mere Animism resist the Muslim supremecists? Those who, though having converted much of modern day Sudan, still aborned the Janaweed who raped Black Muslim women and told them that they were making a superior lighter-skinned child?

              Would they have left Africa alone? Is Islam a more compatible ideology for Africa? Is it indigenous to its people? Would Europe have survived a monolithically Islamic Africa? Is there a single advantage Islam offers Africa that Christianity couldn’t? Is there a single harm perpetrated by Christianity that Islam would not have?

              Second guessing History is a complicated affair. Setting its participants aright exponentially more so.


              Liked by 1 person

    • Charlotte says:

      Yeah -and look at whats happening in S Africa now
      Julius Malema says about whites-“we won’t kill them. Yet”
      Meanwhile hundreds of farmers and ordinary people are being murdered in S Africa. It truly has now become a sh*thole.


  16. jbt says:

    (anybody following how it’s going in the former colonial African countries?)
    Yes indeed…it’s a mess. They have a long battle ahead there – sad, but it’s a battle all republics must fight and win to become strong and enduring. Tempered steel takes time and heat!

    Liked by 2 people

    • Maquis says:

      It needs a willingness to allow that heat to burn away the dross that encumbers the mind and soul. It requires the incorporation of elements that promote resiliance and strength, reduce brittleness, and resist corruption.

      God has much work on His hands in Africa.

      Unfortunately, China and NGOs are not committed to His Agenda.

      Liked by 2 people

  17. Brent Hull says:

    How long before the federal district court judge in Hawaii slapped with a “you are wrong!” by this Supreme Court decision rules Supreme Court unconstitutional and bans enforcement of Supreme Court decisions nationwide?

    Liked by 5 people

    • napoleon32 says:

      I don’t think he’ll be able to sit on the bench for some time. He may need surgery to remove Clarence Thomas’ shoe from his backside.

      Liked by 2 people

  18. budmc says:

    Liked by 6 people

  19. Caius Lowell says:

    Remember how the NYC liberals whined nonstop while Guliani cleaned up their Democrat destroyed city? Then they enjoyed it and bragged about how awesome it was right up to the point where they could get yet another socialist into office so they could junk it all up again. I hate liberals, Democrats, socialists, Bolsheviks, progressives, and all followers of Marx, Baal, Hillary, Obama, etc…

    Liked by 13 people

    • You are right Caius Lowell, I had forgotten all about that.

      Guliani ignored their temper tantrums and went about cleaning up the city.

      The cities residents were very grateful to Rudy and to this day a lot of all over the country call him America’s Mayor.

      Liked by 4 people

  20. ChrisSy says:

    Good job SCOTUS…minus the dissenters, and I applaud you, Mr. President! In a time in which even our libraries are no longer sacred, but have moved into the fascist realm, we do not take our remaining liberties for granted! #MAGA 🇺🇸

    Liked by 4 people

  21. Liked by 21 people

  22. Critical Mass says:

    This is how it’s done, folks. Get the goal posts in place and there is hope of winning.

    The left have shifted the goal posts so many times over at least the last three decades that they’ve forgotten where they put them last.

    Wonder what the next outrage artifact will be?

    Liked by 4 people

  23. Putting On Its Shoes says:

    So let’s bring this back to the Russia investigation through Sally Yates and Andrew Weissman.

    Sally Yates improperly surveilled and hounded General Flynn for a frivolous accusation of a Logan act violation, resulting in his interview that lead to his charge. Weissman prosecuted that charge against Flynn.

    Preceding these events, Sally Yates refused to enforce Trump’s travel ban and received encouragement and support from Andrew Weissman in doing so.

    Now all of the travel bans have been supported by majorities of the Supreme Court, and were clearly lawful.

    So we know Yates and Weissman have terrible judgment about what the law is, yet they are the ones putting people in jail. This corrupt, biased, misguided, arrogant, power-hungry pair has conspired to put Flynn in jail, and otherwise resist the results of the election.

    Who the hell should be in jail?! Who is on the wrong side of the law?! YATES AND WEISSMAN

    Liked by 8 people

  24. budmc says:

    Liked by 3 people

    • L4grasshopper says:

      Schiff trying to be relevant…………….not succeeding 🙂

      Liked by 3 people

    • trumpthepress says:

      Supreme Court says “It’s not a muslim ban”. Adam Schiff says “It is a muslim ban”. This guy is in it so deep…”We must fight for national values”. Does he even know what the phrase national values means? That’s exactly what the ruling did. Can’t wait to see him put behind bars.

      Liked by 5 people

    • jrapdx says:

      I beg to differ with the Representative, rather it’s Rep. Schiff who is “deeply disappointing” in his understanding of the law clearly articulated by the majority opinion in the decision. Furthermore his comment about “national values” is incoherent, but that is unsurprising given his obviously limited intellect and associated difficulty comprehending simple abstract concepts.

      Liked by 2 people

      • M33 says:

        They love the “concept” of majority opinion when it goes their way.
        They deem it unjust and wrong when it constitutionally goes against their wants.

        Like whiney 2 year old children.

        These morons have no concept of how the SYSTEM our founding father put in place works.
        AT ALL.

        Historically conservative? What the hell are they barking about??

        Liked by 1 person

    • LafnH20 says:

      Your National values AIN’T MY National Values….. LOSER!!!

      Liked by 3 people

    • Remington..... says:

      I thought this scum bum was dead?


    • Maquis says:

      Hmmm… He said “fight.” Dem Whistling, again.


    • Katie says:

      How the (bleep) do Muslims have anything in common with OUR nation’s values?

      Liked by 1 person

    • rjcylon says:

      It’s a Muslim ban except the Muslims from the countries that aren’t on the list can still come as they get a special exemption even though they are Muslim. Or something.


    • StanH says:

      The Islamo-Goons would just love you Adam. Perhaps you should pick you a Middle East garden spot and spread those values you speak of.


  25. Budman says:

    Supreme Court delivers a one-two knockout to the Dumb a## liberal regressives! Great day for America!

    Liked by 2 people

  26. L4grasshopper says:

    Next up: the decision in the Janus case about mandatory union dues imposed on government employees. Probably get this one tomorrow.

    Very similar case was passed back to lower Courts on a 4-4 vote because Scalia had recently died.

    Now Gorsuch is on the Court. Logic would indicate Janus overturns the union dues 5-4. But one never knows what butterfly Kennedy is going to do.

    Liked by 2 people

  27. The Wise Latina is about as wise as Calif Obama is a constitutional “scholar”.

    Liked by 2 people

  28. jimbo says:

    How many times have we heard shrill pols scream “WE ARE AT WAR” from the well of the senate or house floor?

    Can anyone imagine if this were 1942 the court telling FDR we must leave the ports open to Germany and Japan because it would be “racist” not to let them in?

    Dear congressional politscum, if we are AT WAR as you continually claim over and over to justify your nation building/regime change throughout the third world, then why are you telling us to leave our borders wide open?

    Why in Valhalla do we allow these politician/fiends to get away with this garbage year in and out.

    Liked by 3 people

  29. Shadrach says:

    Is there any penalty for issuing a dissent that has nothing to do with the law? These are supposed to be judges, and their feelings aren’t relevant to interpretation of the law.

    I have always thought it would be best to have a politically balanced Supreme Court. However, the Sotomayor/Ginsburg dissent applied zero logic. It was ridiculous. If this is what we can expect from very liberal judges, then there’s no point in them.

    I wish Kagan had written the dissent instead. Then maybe it’d at least be worth reading.

    I hope crow tastes good with salt, at least. Load the bench up with judges with brains, and ones who actually use them, thank you very much. Progressives need not apply.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Boy, I agree. I am appalled that a Supreme Court Justice would base a decision on feeling, intent and not the law. Wow, can she be impeached?


    • mimbler says:

      I used to believe in a balanced SC as well. But as I got older I realized the libs are legislating not interpreting law.
      I don’t know if I matured and recognized it or if they have just gradually tilted that way, but now it is full fledged activism by the lefty SC judges.


  30. American says:

    A decent start. We need to replace some of those leftarded SCOTUS judges with real patriots and start mass deportations of illegals, encourage leftards to relinquish their U.S. citizenship and self-deport, end auto citizenship for foreign births on U.S. soil, end chain migration, end visa importation of foreign workers and build that FKN WALL!!!

    Liked by 1 person

  31. Li'l D in the Big D says:

    Rep. Steve King applies this decision to the border crises in the below linked article.

    A few excerpts:

    In one ruling, the Supreme Court has delivered two major victories to President Trump. The first victory is obvious: Trump v. Hawaii validates the President’s broad authority to restrict entry of specified foreign nationals into the United States when the President finds such entry is “detrimental to the interests of the United States.”

    At issue before the Supreme Court was the scope of 8 USC 1182 (f), a federal law which delegates broad authority over immigration policy to the President. Here is the text of that statute:

    Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

    So, it is settled law. President Trump can deny foreign nationals entry to the country. He should immediately issue a Presidential Proclamation suspending the entry of foreign nationals from Mexico, Caribbean, Central, and South American countries until such time as he finds the detrimental effects of illegal immigration from these regions have been curtailed and our border is secure. These areas are home to the violent and dysfunctional countries that export the vast majority of illegal immigrants to America.

    Read the full article at:

    Liked by 3 people

  32. navysquid says:

    Apologize if this is already posted but a couple of things…
    Glad the SCOTUS reinforced the Constitutional rights of the Commander in Chief and his MAIN role to protect our country against foreign enemies. Also I don’t see any dissenting SCOTUS saying anything about Obama when he banned these same 6 countries because of terrorism. Pres Trump implements the same and all H*ll breaks loose…

    My short explanation to my kids when they ask: Liberal/Democrat = Hypocrite.
    Over the years as they’ve grown into young adults they see how true those words were/are.

    Liked by 1 person

  33. phoenixRising says:

    Liked by 1 person

  34. Ben says:

    “Excellent news from SCOTUS! And think about this. President Trump will probably get the opportunity to appoint two more justices to the Supreme Court when Kennedy and Ginsberg shove off! So good for the future of our nation.”

    This was posted on the liberal LA Times comment section and received 5 upvotes and 1 downvote. Wow…

    Liked by 3 people

  35. tripntravel says:

    The Tide Is Turning. The Reckoning is Coming. I am glad I lived to see these days.

    Liked by 1 person

  36. dimplesh says:

    Right decision of Supreme count.
    I like this decision


  37. That’s a bag of winamins..


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s