Wow – Former Trump Campaign Aide Michael Caputo Expands: U.S. Government Agency Attempted To Give Him Hillary Clinton Emails…

Explosive.  Former Trump campaign aide Michael Caputo appeared on Fox News moments ago with stunning statements.  According to Caputo a contractor with a government agency was attempting to pass to him, through an intermediary, Hillary Clinton emails; and the intermediary reached out to Caputo to inform him therein.

In hindsight, Caputo now suggests the “contractor of the government agency” was attempting to set him up -and by extension the Trump campaign- in a sting operation similar to the recently revealed “Crossfire Hurricane” operation conducted by CIA operative Stefan Halper through Carter Page and George Papadopoulos.  WATCH:

.

This could have massive ramifications.  Apparently the intermediary is willing to go on record explaining the contact from the government agency and the contractor therein.  Additionally, according to Caputo, he has already informed the Mueller investigation of these contacts and apparently the Special Counsel is attempting to hide the evidence.

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in AG Jeff Sessions, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, CIA, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2016, FBI, IG Report Clinton Investigation, IG Report FISA Abuse, Jeff Sessions, Legislation, media bias, Notorious Liars, NSA, President Trump, propaganda, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

595 Responses to Wow – Former Trump Campaign Aide Michael Caputo Expands: U.S. Government Agency Attempted To Give Him Hillary Clinton Emails…

  1. Donzo says:

    So the Demms obtained info from their own server to make it look like Russia’s doing so they could entrap Caputo and possibly others with the info. I wouldn’t be surprised to find out that “our” own IC attacked the server. What is the real reason the FBI never obtained a warrant for the.server when it was the single most crucial piece of evidence of possible intrusion by a foreign entity? Foreign my A$$!

    Liked by 18 people

    • Electra says:

      You’re right. If these conversations with Caputo and the intermediary took place before the alleged hacking of the DNC, that would have all sorts of implications; because how would the government source know specific info from DNC emails unless the DNC willingly supplied them–and with the implied intention of later reporting them stolen. I guess it depends on the date the emails actually WERE stolen. Seth Rich was murdered on July 10, 2016. That’s all I know about it. Is this a crazy idea? Have I missed something obvious?

      Liked by 7 people

      • Tom22ndState says:

        Exactly, as I recall the DNC were leaked the last week or so of July.I also saw it listed in Sheryl Atkinson’s excellent time- line.

        Liked by 7 people

        • JMC says:

          I think I recall that the DNC server was originally “hacked” in March 2016 and that CrowdStrike was called in by the DNC to deal with it. Then after the July “hack” the FBI used CrowdStrike as contractor to deal with that “hack”. Of course CrowdStrike determined that both hacks were the Russkis.

          Liked by 2 people

        • AsksTooManyQuestions says:

          According to https://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/russian-government-hackers-broke-into-dnc-servers-stole-trump-oppo-224315 “In late April [2016], the DNC’s IT department noticed some suspicious behavior and contacted DNC chief executive officer Amy Dacey, according to a DNC official.”

          The DNC, as we know, brought in CrowdStrike “to install monitoring software to analyze the details of who was responsible.

          Their conclusion? “CrowdStrike designated two groups that gained access to the DNC’s info. One, codenamed Cozy Bear, broke into the DNC last summer and had been monitoring the committee’s emails and chats. The other group CrowdStrike dubbed Fancy Bear. It hacked into the DNC in April aiming to get opposition research files. The Fancy Bear breach is what tipped off DNC officials. Fancy Bear was able to gain access to all of the DNC’s research staff computers.

          In a blog post, CrowdStrike co-founder Dmitri Alperovitch said there was no coordination between the groups.”

          The article was written in July 2016, before the MSM knew that Trump-Russia was going to be a “thinkg” so it’s kind of interesting how they downplay the data breach: “The DNC hack comes after two straight election cycles in which intelligence officials said foreign government cyber espionage was rampant.” and “National Intelligence Director James Clapper alluded to these past incidents earlier this year and warned that the 2016 race would be no different.”

          Liked by 1 person

          • I know its a crazy thought, but doesn’t Seth Rich play into all of this, concerning the “hacked” DNC and release of documents to Wikileaks?

            Was Assange ever questioned about any of this?

            Liked by 2 people

            • Newt Love says:

              > “… Was Assange ever questioned about any of this?”

              No, but Assange hinted very heavily that it was Set Rich, as did the “300+ pound hacker,” what’s his name? Kim Dotcom?

              Liked by 1 person

            • lotbusyexec says:

              No

              Like

            • Jan says:

              Rich is at the fore-front because he was a Bernie Sanders supporter who realized that the DNC was screwing over Bernie. I read something that said he had accepted a job with the Hillary campaign right before his death (which i’ve either forgotten or didn’t know about). Opponents to the Crowdstrike opinion–that the Russians hacked the DNC servers–say that the speed at which the files were downloaded were done to a thumb stick, not over the internet. Assange has said, the Hillary emails DID NOT come from Russia. Wikileaks has offered at least a $20,000 reward for an arrest/conviction that leads to Rich’s murderer. Some say the Rich murder was ordered by Wasserman -Schultz and/or John Podesta and/or Hillary. He could have been murdered by Imran Awan & friends or MS-13 on the order of DWS, Podesta or Hillary. We may find this out if we can just get rid of Dimms who oppose the truth coming out….that would be DWS, Podesta & Hillary, along with a few others.

              I will say that the Seth Rich family has been threatened because they have mostly rejected media attention, as well as demanding his murderer be found or calling out for better local attention. My heart goes out to the Rich family: they lost their son, and Hillary is still out of jail. There is nothing fair about that, unless you’re a Dimm who crawls on his/her/their belly like a reptile.

              Liked by 2 people

              • Within days after Rich’s death, they had a DNC “minder” and adamantly insisted their son did not steal the data. His cousin and a brother, however, both say this is something he would have done. Recently, it was reported that his parents finally admitted that he did it. Not verified by any MSM, tho, to my knowledge. Dana Rohrabacher went to the Embassy and interviewed Julian, who gave him proof it was NOT the Russians. Julian wants a pardon so he can come to the US and give the info to PDJT. Last I heard, Rohrabacher had not yet met with the President. No doubt there are many around PDJT who do NOT want Julian to get a pardon.

                Liked by 1 person

              • Deplorable_Infidel says:

                “Dimms who oppose the truth coming out….that would be DWS, Podesta & Hillary, along with a few others.”

                https://ellacruz.org/2017/11/05/just-to-remember/

                “….Former Democratic National Committee interim chairwoman Donna Brazile is the high-ranking DNC representative who allegedly called police and the family of murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich and demanded to know why a private investigator was “snooping” into Rich’s death, the private eye revealed to WND Monday….”

                https://ellacruz.org/2018/03/01/the-parkland-falsflag-evidences-how-many-evidences-do-we-need/

                “…..However, in another article, the author perfectly connects the Broward County’s body count to Seth Rich…..”

                Like

          • Electra says:

            Thank you, AsksTooMany.

            Liked by 1 person

          • starfcker says:

            “In a blog post, CrowdStrike co-founder Dmitri Alperovitch said there was no coordination between the groups.” hold on a minute. Are you talking about born in Moscow Dmitri Alperovitch? The guy who looked at the DNC server and decided Russia had hacked it? I’m starting to get all my Russians confused.

            Like

      • Electra says:

        Okay. I checked it out, and the FBI reported a breach of the computers in September 2015, and then the DNC reported that data had been stolen by April 29, 2016–which puts them both before Caputo’s conversations in May 2016. Sooo… My theory is a bust.☹️

        Liked by 1 person

        • dreamguardian007 says:

          Seemed logical to me, Electra. Shame Meuller et al don’t have your courage and honesty!

          Liked by 1 person

        • I don’t know, it looks like the trap was being set to me.

          Like

          • Electra says:

            Well, I think it’s safe to assume the DNC passed the DNC emails to the sting operation, at some point. I was just thinking that if the Caputo sting happened before the leaks/hacks, that would virtually prove the email info came directly from the DNC, thus showing conspiracy. If the the sting came after the leaks/hacks, the conspirators could say that the info could conceivably have come from somewhere else.

            But something else occurs to me: if the so-called NSA contractor actually was an NSA contractor (and I don’t really believe that), then he/she actually could have gotten the info from the NSA, regardless of when the DNC servers were hacked–because, after all, they’re the NSA.

            Honestly, there are so many players in this thing, that you could posit a hundred plausible scenarios. What a byzantine cellar!

            Liked by 2 people

        • RJones says:

          At least you’re trying. Most folks couldn’t be bothered.

          Liked by 2 people

      • JT says:

        Rush said he thinks the Pakistan Awan brothers stole the emails from the DNC.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Walt says:

        There is the issue of what was in the promised emails. Those DNC emails that found their way to Wikileaks were very damaging to Hillary’s campaign; they could not have wanted to dump more of the same.

        I think this argues pretty strongly against our own IC being the DNC hacker/data thief.

        Liked by 1 person

      • G. Alistar says:

        Hmmmm. Wonder who on Mueller’s team is assigned to read Sundance? Might be a good time to flip over to being honest. Easier to get a Presidential pardon if they stop all this gestepo tactics. Besides, telling the truth is good for the soul.

        Liked by 1 person

    • mopar2016 says:

      The crooks at the top don’t want there to be any hard evidence of their crimes.
      If the Hillary e-mails aren’t on a .gov server, then they’re harder for anyone to find.
      All the FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests would turn up nothing.
      I’ve always thought that obama probably instructed Hillary to use a private server.

      Liked by 2 people

    • dawg says:

      Bingo. That was my biggest takeaway from the Wiki dump last summer. They revealed CIAs Project Umbrage, which was their ability to leave fingerprints of another country when they hacked into something. False attribution. Wiki dumped this right after it was coming out about Crowdstrike, etc…and the evidence of Russia being the ones who attacked. I immediately recognized the significance of this and have thought that ever since then, it was our own CIA that “hacked” the DNC, to make it look like the Russians and then be able to say “Trump asked the Russians to find the emails, they tried, so Trump colluding with Russia”.

      Liked by 4 people

      • JMC says:

        Yup. And CrowdStrike, which was full of Dem operatives, was glad to oblige and supply the Russians as culprits.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Jan says:

          Rich is at the fore-front because he was a Bernie Sanders supporter who realized that the DNC was screwing over Bernie. I read something that said he had accepted a job with the Hillary campaign right before his death (which i’ve either forgotten or didn’t know about). Opponents to the Crowdstrike opinion–that the Russians hacked the DNC servers–say that the speed at which the files were downloaded were done to a thumb stick, not over the internet. Assange has said, the Hillary emails DID NOT come from Russia. Wikileaks has offered at least a $20,000 reward for an arrest/conviction that leads to Rich’s murderer. Some say the Rich murder was ordered by Wasserman -Schultz and/or John Podesta and/or Hillary. He could have been murdered by Imran Awan & friends or MS-13 on the order of DWS, Podesta or Hillary. We may find this out if we can just get rid of Dimms who oppose the truth coming out….that would be DWS, Podesta & Hillary, along with a few others.

          I will say that the Seth Rich family has been threatened because they have mostly rejected media attention, as well as demanding his murderer be found or calling out for better local attention. My heart goes out to the Rich family: they lost their son, and Hillary is still out of jail. There is nothing fair about that, unless you’re a Dimm who crawls on his/her/their belly like a reptile.

          Like

        • Your Tour Guide says:

          Whenever someone hired Crowdstrike, it would always
          come out that it was a Russian hack. In record time.
          Funny how that worked.

          Liked by 1 person

        • In looking at Sharyl Atkisson’s timeline the past couple of days, I am struck by how many times Ukrainians enter the picture and blame everything on Russia. Crowdstrike was founded by a Ukrainian who just happened to be there, possibly even to plant “Russian” evidence. Very well connected, this Crowdstrike and Dimitri Alperovitch.
          http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/24/crowdstrike-five-things-everyone-is-ignoring-about-the-russia-dnc-story/

          Liked by 1 person

      • This is what makes sense, right?

        I researched it.

        It would seem that since P Trump asked the Russians to: ‘if they have Hillary’s emails, then release them,’ then along come the Russians saying to Caputo, ‘OK, we have them and we will turn them over to you.’

        This would have shown a clear act of collusion (conspiracy) between P Trump and the Russians. Or at least give the commies a lot of ammo.

        But, the time lines do not add up. Caputo insists that he was approached in May of 2016. And as best as I can tell, P Trump said this to the Russians in a speech on July 7, 2016–two months later than Caputo was offered the emails.

        Liked by 1 person

    • WSB says:

      Sam Clovis just described a same similar set up on Tucker’s show. WOW!

      Liked by 4 people

    • jackbenimble333 says:

      The article is talking about the Hillary Clinton emails. Presumably that would be the 30,000 emails she deleted. You seem to be talking about the DNC Server hack which was different stuff.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Electra says:

    Jack Posobiec at OANN is reporting that the government agency purported to be the source of the offered emails, was the NSA. Of course, this was probably false. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/05/posobiec-at-oann-second-informant-claimed-to-be-nsa/

    Like

    • Mike says:

      If jack is involved you can be sure it’s fake.

      Liked by 1 person

    • sundance says:

      Liked by 16 people

      • RJones says:

        Is there any speculation about why Neither Mueller nor either body of Congress had interest in following up? Caputo is saying nobody has contacted his friend or seem to have pulled this thread. Also, does the fact that Caputo is walking around unindicted tell us anything of Mueller? The way those guys seem to be playing the game is that if you have the info you’re toast.

        Liked by 3 people

        • WSB says:

          The Gang of Eight wants plausible deniability. I expect Mueller does too.

          Liked by 2 people

        • Electra says:

          Caputo was trying to say more about that, but Cavuto kept cutting him off. What is it about these talking heads? They seem to need to constantly inject themselves. So frustrating to watch.

          Liked by 1 person

          • lakelurelife says:

            I despise Cavuto. After his rant calling our President a liar, I have no use for him. Smarmy, worthless shill that he is.

            Liked by 1 person

      • JMC says:

        The NSA, the CIA, the Russians. Could have been anybody. We’ll probably never know. Unless the intermediary, i.e the friend of Caputo, can identify the guy.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Sundance: With all this new information, it would be helpful to have a timeline to share with those who have no idea or those who are dims.

        Like

      • MaineCoon says:

        Now that Caputo has divuled the NSA contractors this makes sense. This piece of the puzzle SD has posting connects the dots for me. Caputo needs to tell as much as he knows. It just might save his life.

        Liked by 2 people

      • TMonroe says:

        I wonder if the NSA director at the time might now be free to, I don’t know, testify about that…

        Liked by 1 person

      • TheUnknownPatriot says:

        Caputo’s story seems dicey to me. Government contractor offered you Hillary’s emails and you didn’t bother to tell any of the 3 investigative bodies that information when you testified? You just thought about this 2 weeks ago? Now that Caputo has stated this publicly, the left will say that this is what caused the investigation into Trumps campaign.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Mezzz says:

      Elec- Posobiec also claimed General Kelly was drugging Trump by spiking his diet cokes. He also claimed inside info that we would have 300,000 troops in Syria within 3 months of when Trump sent that warning shot early in his first year. He comes up with whoppers like these often, claiming inside info and just moves on to the next thing in the next news cycle.

      Posobiec is such a fraud I’m surprised anyone follows him longer than 2 months.

      Liked by 3 people

    • pmdea says:

      Going back Judge Nap said someone from NSA was involved with giving Wikileaks the emails.

      Around that time Col Shaffer also said in a Fox interview that it was someone from within the IC (guess could be contractor) who obtained the DNC/Podesta emails.

      Graig Murray in a radio interview said that there could have been 2 sources – 1) for DNC – an insider and 2) – Podesta’s emails could have been obtained from IC, although at the time he said he was not speaking for Wikileaks. He also said it was possible that people may have wrongly believed that they had been obtained from an insider i.e. SR wrong target. Hence JA inference of SR and his timely death.
      Also SR could have been approached and assisted someone else – IC contractor.

      They were obtained from within the US re VIPS report and delivered to Wikileaks..no muh Russia. But now this new info…I really don’t know but,
      Getting interesting….

      Like

  3. Gary says:

    Here is the thing. We know how the Mule works and shakes down people. We know there is a pattern of set ups going on with the Don Jr meeting and spies in the UK. Michael Caputo may have decided he had enough and told the Mule this, even if not true he could find out if he followed up. If the mule did not follow up it is an issue, even if Caputo made the thing up. When one is fabricating a charge, like the deep state is small forced errors can be killer. It is either the truth or it is a trap for the Mule, set by someone who has nothing to loose and a justified chip on his shoulder.

    Like

    • Deplorable_Infidel says:

      “if Caputo made the thing up.”

      EXCUSE ME? The man had to sell his house because of legal fees. Do you really think he is going on national TV broadcasts “making things up”? His family has been put through enough already.

      “a trap for the Mule, set by someone who has nothing to loose and a justified chip on his shoulder”

      You have a very active imagination going, that Mr. Caputo is seeking revenge on Mr. Mueller AND the House and Senate Committees that subpoenaed him to testify and now has concocted a brilliant countermeasure.

      “someone who has nothing to loose”

      Since when is a loving wife and two young daughters “nothing to loose”?

      Liked by 10 people

      • listingstarboard says:

        Seriously, Caputo didn’t have to continue to speak out, in fact he had every reason not to say another word! He is doing the RIGHT THING, and putting himself and his family in grave danger to do so! For heavens sake!

        Liked by 5 people

    • soozala says:

      I think Caputo has been “saved” by GoFundMe backers and believers. I think he was able to keep his house and because of the support from people who believe in what he is doing, he feels he is out of the financial woods enough to speak out….LOUDLY….which he is doing, thank God! He has also stated that he would like to help others with some financial support as well….others that he knows would be willing to speak out in support of Trump and not cower in fear of financial ruin as he did for a while. God Bless this man!!!

      Liked by 10 people

    • Donzo says:

      I doubt Caputo would make this allegation if the intermediary wasn’t willing to corroborate it. Mueller could call Caputo’s bluff and it would be a win win. But he didn’t call his bluff which means Mueller knew Caputo was right and decided to try and hide it which fits his MO.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Concerned Virginian says:

      Nice try. No prize.

      Like

  4. Brant says:

    Besides maybe ok by his lawyers to talk, maybe he was directed by white hats to see/hear what happens. Maybe there was some scatter and chatter after his first appearance. They set stuff in place and said get back out there.

    Like

  5. It is very clear now that the IC was trying to flush incriminating information through the Trump campaign so that they could retrieve it in the sewer later and attribute its origin to the campaign. Caputo’s mention of “contractors” likely refers to the CIA as being the author of this as contractors at law enforcement agencies are not “sworn” officers and do not participate operationally in agency business. The CIA uses tons of operational contractors (many of my friends from the military serve in these roles) so as to avoid having a “blue badger” (CIA employee) involved in contacting the campaign for the purpose of future deniability. It is no surprise that the contractor’s burner phone is no longer in service as this is an example, among other things, of the CIA acting operationally in CONUS which is explicitly illegal.

    Liked by 5 people

    • It also occurs to me that the CIA was “pitching” the game while the FBI was “catching” here. CIA injects illicit information into the Trump campaign in order for the FBI to “discover” it on the back end and make the case criminally. Except that apparently nobody in the campaign really was buying what the CIA was selling and so the FBI never did obtain the criminal predicate that it was hoping to see. That dovetails with the necessity for a CI investigation which may be the undoing of the Special Counsel investigation as there was never any criminal act to hang it on. It is tough to say whether the campaign was squeaky clean, naive to “the game” of politics and not interested in this gossipy stuff, or simply “head down” working their own campaign strategy to defeat Hillary. Probably some combination.

      Liked by 8 people

      • CNN_sucks says:

        You got it. Just need to identify and place all these actors in the degree of their criminality.

        Like

      • Sandra-VA says:

        I think you nailed it, Froggy! This was exactly what they were doing…

        Like

      • nbkilgore says:

        After reading through some of these well thought out discussions among my fellow Treepers, a picture is beginning to take some form. What I,m starting to see is Brennan and Clapper had obviously been doubled crossed and I’ll betcha donuts to dollars these two clowns are just now finding out that they’d been had. Think back when, you may recall some of Brennan’s statements about other reports are going to be surfacing soon, and that was after the facts started surfacing that the golden showers was a fiction novel of Mr. Steel and Nelli Ore’s imaginations. They were so sure that other damaging material were forthcoming, but notice their demeanor started changing over time, Brennan became more hostile and Clapper is in a major cover my ass mode. I hope you all understand what I’m trying to pose here. Now I’m going to be deep diving the rest of the night and week reviewing videos.Now it makes a lot more sense, cheers!

        Liked by 1 person

        • Amy2 says:

          My head is spinning! Who double crossed them?

          Liked by 1 person

          • nbkilgore says:

            Amy2, sorry mine is too after bird dogging Mutt and Jeff for 17 months. They were double crossed by one or two of the three “Contractors”! I’m sensing that they said they did what they were paid to do, but in reality they really didn’t deliver the goods. One of the plants has not surfaced since the story broke last year. Brennan was so sure that other damaging material (HRC email) against DJT was going to surface any moment, the longer he waited for the ah-ha moment, the more hostile he became.

            Liked by 1 person

    • BestBets says:

      Fundamentally, this is akin to a killer wiping the gun clean and putting it in the dead person’s hand.

      Like

    • lizzyp says:

      Last week or so, when Brennan started mouthing off, something he said reminded me of something I heard Jim Woolsey say several years ago regarding Iraq and WMD’s. Woolsey said that we basically had no real idea what they had or didn’t have because they were practicing something called ‘red on red disinformation.’ They would tell one general something like ‘yeah, we have all these nasty chemical weapons, we’re even closing in on nukes – General Soandso is in charge of that stuff!’ Then they’d tell another general ‘oh, no. We got rid of all that stuff years ago- we were complying and those evil Americans invaded us anyway!’

      That concept is starting to seem a little familiar.

      Like

  6. Steve53323 says:

    Why isn’t this front and center on Drudge?

    Liked by 2 people

    • bosscook says:

      I’ve just about given up on Drudge.

      Liked by 7 people

    • JMC says:

      Because TCTH is the new front and center!

      Liked by 6 people

      • WSB says:

        !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        Like

      • lotbusyexec says:

        Funny, when I first started out on this computer/internet “stuff” Drudge was my go to site, then Breitbart came along and I was back and forth between the two (especially when the first Weinner story broke – boy that was like watching a tennis match in my head!) . Then I realized that the Daily Mail was usually a few hours ahead of most news stories so then that became #1. I’ve dabbled and found other sites (Gateway Pundit, NY Post, WSJ, Twitter,…) BUT TCH is my new home. Feel safe knowing I am amongst the brightest, most dedicated of countrymen and most informed of people — thanks for being my go to site not only for news BUT also for comfort.

        Liked by 2 people

  7. Bob Thoms says:

    While some of the details of the Caputo story might be incongruous; the over arching theme that he would be approached by a Halper run sting operation is very feasible. Especially given Halper and Caputo’s ties to Reagan and Bush. And especially if Halper is trying to taint the Trump Campaign early on with the Russian collusion narrative.

    Like

    • Bob Thoms says:

      At that time there was a whole lot of people Halper could “reccruit.”….it seems he targeted them all – Trump Jr, Pap, Paige, Caputo, All targeted right?

      Like

    • WSB says:

      Sam Clovis was just on Tucker and has a similar story about Halper.

      This was a sting and frame job put into operations by our own government.

      Liked by 7 people

    • MaineCoon says:

      The added facts subsequent to the interview help connect the dots, ie the Halper connection, NSA, sting op. I hope the second person goes on the record soon. Like tomorrow.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Zimbalistjunior says:

      Let’s not forget what could be the greatest piece of info ever. What if halper was one of the west coast rat-f-ers along with Donald segretti and others, tasked with screwing McGovern in 72 as part of ops later known as watergate? He was there- he was later accused of the same stuff re jimmy carter campaign etc

      And best of all what if this solves the mystery of why HRC was fired while working in watergate investigation? For halper must have known bill from oxford. Did HRC get fired for leaking to halper or for saving Halper?

      If this slightly wacky theory of connecting the dots is true then we have completed the circle of american history very nicely.

      Liked by 1 person

  8. tom dunkle says:

    We are so far off the deep end in this country regarding the 2016 election don`t know how to put things back again unless one side goes off the plank. There really is no serious dialogue anymore. Just screaming and carrying on. Used to enjoy a good debate, everyone shakes hands and move on. Just not possible now. These folks committed treason. No way to sugar coat it and if Sessions doesn`t step to the plate soon God knows what will happen.

    Liked by 4 people

  9. hellinahandbasket says:

    So….. the CIA hacked the Podesta emails eh…? Then tried to give them to the Trump campaign to set them up as the hackers in cahoots with Russia (as the hired thug) doing the hacking FOR the Trump campaign. Chances are, the CIA left Russian fingerprints all over Podesta’s email account to further the sting’s Russia tie-in. Wonder why they were okay with setting free those damning emails of Podesta’s? Perhaps they didn’t think WikiLeaks had them as well, and they would be discounted if the Trump campaign released them, as a political boondoggle – perhaps a White Hat from the CIA gave them to WikiLeaks to leap-frog over the CIA sting, rendering their attempt to frame a Trump/Russia collusion story moot. … Or was it the NSA who had the Podesta emails (since Snowden told us all how they collect EVERYTHING), and a White Hat (known to MRogers?) slipped them to WikiLeaks before the CIA could finish the Trump/Russia collusion sting…? As for Seth Rich popping-up – perhaps Seth Rich had evidence of voter impropriety and manipulation via NGP Van data, which revealed the illegal sinister plan of redistricting states for more Democrat votes – I also wonder where the campaign’s Internet technology director, Bryan Pagliano fits into all of this. The guy’s been with the Clinton’s for a long time, and he out of anyone there, knew EXACTLY the security issues the Clinton server, and the DNC computers had from the get-go. …But hey, I could be wrong – I just don’t know anymore. This thing has so many levels of web-like trails, all with many twisty-turns, I’m almost to the point of avoiding information because I can’t adequately process it all. #MAGA … because at least now we know it can be done!

    Liked by 1 person

    • dawg says:

      Bingo. Project Umbrage.

      Trump makes joke about Russia finding HRCs emails. CIA hacks DNC, leaves false attribution of Russia. Voila! Trump-Russia collusion.

      Liked by 4 people

      • WSB says:

        Is it possible that the cabal wanted to plant the emails within the Trump campaign, but Rogers cut off the artery?

        Is this why Plan B was put into effect to try and pass the emails through unassuming humans?

        Like

    • billrla says:

      hellinahandbasket: “They” want to overload us with information. We cannot allow that to happen.

      Liked by 3 people

    • JMC says:

      We don’t even know if there were actually Russian footprints on the “hacked” Podesta emails. It’s Crowdstrike that made that claim.

      Liked by 6 people

      • hellinahandbasket says:

        But that’s the point … they’re ultimately NOT “Russia” fingerprints, the CIA can leave whomever’s prints they want – heck, any hacker can leave someone else’s prints on their hack, and from what I understand, that’s usually what is done. As for Crowdstrike, if they indeed did see what they said (Russia prints), they saw CIA prints, believing them to be Russia’s. I don’t pretend to know anything at this point, just a dozen or so “perhaps” here and there {wink}

        Liked by 4 people

        • Krashman Von Stinkputin says:

          How’s this for Russian fingerprints:
          THE NAME OF THE RUSSIAN WHO LED THE FIRST TWO SOVIET STATE SECURITY ORGANIZATIONS.

          “Crowdstrike and the DNC automatically claimed Guccifer 2.0 was a Russian hacker. This was supported by Russian words, in Cyrillic alphabet, being in the metadata of the documents. The name “Felix Edmundovich” was also in the metadata. Felix Edmundovich is an alias of Felix Dzerzhinsky, first chief of the Soviet security service.”

          The Russian pros hack the DNC and leave this calling card???

          This is about as subtle as me robbing the White House and leaving John Brennan’s drivers license on the FRONT PORCH.
          Oops…my bad.

          Liked by 2 people

      • Sandra-VA says:

        There were no “russian footprints” in the hacked Podesta emails. The phishing link showed to be from Ukraine.

        There were “russian footprints” left in the DNC materials, however.

        Liked by 3 people

  10. MAGA_Berserker says:

    Remember when the Bernie campaign was “accidentally” given access to killery’s campaign data, but then the Bernie campaign people were immediately caught accessing the data?

    “Dec. 18, 2015 at 6:30 PM
    How Berned Is Bernie Sanders By The DNC Data Breach?
    A lot. At least for now.”

    https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-berned-is-bernie-sanders-by-the-dnc-data-breach/

    Liked by 3 people

  11. cliffaheadwolvesbehind says:

    Calling Jeff Session!! The streams of exposed corruption against President Trump have become surging impressive waterfalls ,but can anyone find Jeff Sessions ? We go about our day, working and living,and then read in horror the increasingly exposed stench of the swamp.
    Remember the book “Where is Waldo?
    How about a prize for anyone who spots Sessions?

    Liked by 1 person

  12. motreehouse says:

    Podesta could have been hacked by a 400 pound guy from His bed, the dnc stuff came from seth rich.

    Liked by 2 people

  13. Coast says:

    Why would Mueller be interested in this since he probably knows more about this than anyone.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. Pam says:

    Liked by 11 people

  15. 17CatsInTN says:

    As more and more facts come out about the twisted criminal things going on behind the scenes, it becomes obvious why “they” were so sure the murderous hag would win. “They” were engineering everything to that end, and, of course, they COULDN’T lose. Imagine that.

    Liked by 3 people

  16. MaineCoon says:

    Tucker’s interview of Sam Clocis re: Stefen Halper’s request to meet with him & subsequent meeting. He highly suspects in hind sight Halper was up to no good.

    Liked by 3 people

  17. RJones says:

    Something about this story just doesn’t sit well with me…observations:
    – Why no follow-up by anyone? Nobody called the friend and said, “What the hey?”
    – Clinton’s email, and he didn’t mention it to anyone? Are you kidding me?
    – The explosive Clinton Sweden pay-for-play email discussed and he didn’t tell anyone? Are you kidding me?
    – Why would someone not used to handling classified matter worry about legality? People going to Wikileaks never worry about that.
    – What was the point of leaving the office and using a personal cell phone? Sounds ridiculous.

    Agree with others the guy doesn’t seem deceptive, but this story is just plain weird.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Koot Katmando says:

      Looks pretty fishy to me too.

      Like

    • Tonawanda says:

      The “perilous” classified documents I was offered prompted me to advise my friend to advise the intermediary to advise the government staffers to advise a government whistle blowing agency, but I personally did not advise the FBI.

      And I didn’t report the explosive political documents to the campaign because I was scared of looking like a kook. I had no close personal friend who was also a close personal friend of Trump’s who could have told someone in the campaign so as not to embarrass myself as a kook.

      And being asked if Russians offered to give me the identical documents did not recall to mind that a government intermediary offered them to me on behalf of government staffers.

      And BTW give me money, I do not have 125 wealthy friends who could have held a $1000 dinner for me. And of course it is not like I have conducted million dollar “consulting” deals over the years which might have given me a buck or two.

      Liked by 1 person

      • TheUnknownPatriot says:

        Seems fishy to me as well. Either way, Now that this is out in the public. This event is what they will say caused the investigation into the Trump campaign to start.

        Liked by 1 person

  18. TexasDude says:

    Mueller has tried to entrap others long ago. It should have been expected for him to do it again.

    Liked by 2 people

  19. stringplayer55 says:

    This is YUUUUGE news breaking for Cavuto, and he looks angry that this news is coming out. How long is FOX going to keep this a$$h@t on their payroll?

    Liked by 1 person

  20. Mezzz says:

    Taking Michael Caputo at face value is foolish. Spend a few minutes researching his background and affiliations before you put faith in anything he says.

    There are warning flags everywhere.

    Like

  21. Stormyeyes says:

    Liked by 1 person

    • Carrie says:

      He’s probably in China! He sure knows the place well. We should put out an APB on American tourists in China to be on the lookout for “The Walrus”.

      Like

    • Dances with Wolverines says:

      Federal witness protection program provided by the crooked FBI?

      Like

      • Deplorable_Infidel says:

        The U.S. Marshal Service administers the Federal Witness Protection program. People from the FBI are probably forbidden to access it, otherwise the witnesses would no longer be protected. The FBI cannot even protect ordinary Americans, even after being given advance warnings on multiple occasions.

        Like

  22. Sandra-VA says:

    A point of order! People are conflating several things, so here is the layout:

    1: HRC Emails from her server – not hacked. These were officially released in dribs and drabs. Wikileaks placed them in searchable format on their site.

    2: DNC “hacks” – the DNC materials are actually two parts:

    a) One set of “leaks” via wikileaks presumed to have been via Seth Rich

    b) another via Guccifer 2.0 who initially posted to a WP site and then turned over to wikileaks. There is evidence in the DNC G2 materials that they were seeded with russian footprints; contained “Warren Flood” as author docs. (see http://g-2.space/ for detailed info).

    3: Podesta emails which were obtained via a phishing link and given to wikileaks.

    Liked by 4 people

  23. Patriot1783 says:

    Newt on Ingraham
    “What did Valerie Jarrett know and when did she know it.”

    “What did President Obama know and when did he know it.”

    Liked by 4 people

    • 1stgoblyn says:

      Soetoro learned about everything the same time everyone else did via the news. /s

      Liked by 1 person

    • Minnie says:

      Yes, saw that 👍

      Liked by 1 person

    • distracted2 says:

      Laura Ingraham also said that she and a DOJ producer have identified the source/informant Caputo was referring to and they have talked to him. The informant denied trying to entrap Caputo and denied working for one of the intelligence agencies.

      That said, how likely would that person out himself? Not likely. There is, however, someone who reportedly “volunteered” to be a plant /informant in the Trump campaign so it could be this person Caputo had contact with. Or, more likely, the informant was not going to out himself to Laura Ingraham.

      Liked by 1 person

  24. JoD says:

    Classic MO…
    The asset creates a relationship with Carter Page. He then uses the relationship with Page as the basis to establish a relationship with Clovis. Next, the asset moves in on Pappadupe and uses his “relationship” with Clovis to make another “new friend.”
    You’ve seen this technique in dozens of movies. Very basic stuff.

    Like

  25. beigun says:

    No wonder Jeff Sessions played the role of tricky Br’er Rabbit and the “Tar Baby.” With wolves and foxes all around in the DOJ and FBI, all using the false “Russian Collusion” delusion, what else was a Possum to do? Lay low silently and watch how the “Tar Baby” of “Russian Collusion” ensnared his foes as they entangled themselves deeper and deeper in deception. Lies and coverup being the main ingredient to the “Tar Baby,” along with the so “secret” sauce that stuck to Clapper and Brennan. Too classified to be released to the public or Congress. Protecting the country, ‘Ya know. Classification becomes the Summon Bonnum, the highest good of the State.

    This is why intelligence officers have never been granted operational command throughout history. We have “restricted” and “unrestricted” line officers when it comes to operational command, based in military law. Clapper and Hayden were four-star Generals, but they could not command a 1st LT at Verdun or an Ensign in a lifeboat as they were “restricted” line officers. Think about it. Intelligence officers are forbidden from operational command. The reason is obvious and has been passed down for millennia. To think otherwise would eventually lead to a Police State.

    Liked by 1 person

  26. Eric C. says:

    What would be best from Obama, set-up to take out loser Trump after election and make Kaine an offer he couldn’t refuse: the Presidency. Set-up to take out Trump and make it so Hillary had to resign getting rid of the Clintons so Obama and Company could really cash-in.

    Liked by 1 person

  27. Krashman Von Stinkputin says:

    I’m leary of Caputu’s claims at this point.
    Who does he want his intermediary to go on the record with?

    The previously damned to hell Congressional committees or the Sons of a Bitches at the Mueller team?

    Get a lawyer, sign a sworn affadavit and send it to EVERYONE, EVERYWHERE.
    Then let them come to him.

    Like

  28. Fools Gold says:

    Boom, I pray he can prove that without a shadow of a doubt in court!

    Like

    • benifranlkin says:

      doesn’t need to…think Mueller’s going to say diddly? House Intelligence will verify what he told them…and his reasoning is believable in hindsight…it’s a winner

      Liked by 1 person

  29. fobdangerclose says:

    To much fecal matter in the D C swamp it’s going to require a Massive Septic Tank pumping /clean out!

    Liked by 1 person

  30. Kent says:

    I’m sure someone has already referred to it…but maybe they should have named their operation….

    “Sympathy for the Devil”….

    Like

  31. Delibero says:

    If Michael Caputo is telling the truth, and I have no reason to doubt that he is being truthful, it is very fortunate that he and his intermediary were wise enough to refuse and didn’t fall for the sting or set up and agree to receive the alleged e-mails.

    If he’d received some planted e-mails, or agreed to receive any e-mail that was classified, the Trump campaign would have been accused and indicted of some “trumped up” charge and Trump would likely still be fighting to clear his name etc. This was one egregious attempt to frame the Trump campaign that Joe DeGenova often talks about.

    The lack of interest by Mueller in Caputo’s info is not surprising due to the fact that Rod’s hatchet man and his Dem marauders have a knack of focusing on potential crimes of Trump aides etc while ignoring real crimes with abundant evidence piling up around them about their deep state buddies.

    Liked by 3 people

Comments are closed.