Huma Abedin Laptop Emails and The Non-Investigated Issues Therein…

The Department of Justice Inspector General will soon release a report on the government’s investigation of Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified information. It’s taken a long time; and with good reason. The scale of the misconduct and criminal activity is staggering.

The video below is the final installment of six segments. This report covers the Clinton and Abedin email that were discovered after the investigation was closed in July 2016. {Go Deep} The emails along with the fact that they were on Anthony Weiner’s laptop was kept secret and not investigated for four weeks (Sept 28th, through Oct 27th) by top officials at the FBI. Who stalled the investigation and why? And what was in those emails. That’s the focus of this segment.


When the IG report reviewing how the Clinton email investigation was handled comes out, there will likely be a review of Peter Kadzik, the former Main Justice Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs. In congressional testimony Sept. 12th, 2016, Kadzik told Congress he was in charge of the Clinton e-mail probe for the Justice Department.

Bulletpoint #3

•  Allegations that the Department’s Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs improperly disclosed non-public information to the Clinton campaign and/or should have been recused from participating in certain matters.

That is a specific IG reference to Peter Kadzik, and THIS STORY.

More on Peter Kadzik available HERE

First Five Video Installments available HERE

This entry was posted in Big Government, Clinton(s), CTH Video Series, Decepticons, Deep State, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Election 2016, FBI, media bias, Notorious Liars, Stonetear investigation, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

444 Responses to Huma Abedin Laptop Emails and The Non-Investigated Issues Therein…

  1. Sugarhillhardrock says:

    Ok, a question for any learned Treeper:
    There is an undercurrent jurisdictional suggestion that military tribunals can be employed to charge and try the conspirators associated with sedition. Could that, please, be explained ?
    Many here have a knowledgeable and informed understanding of parts of Federal Criminal Procedure, i know a bit of it, but how do defendants trigger the jurisdiction of military tribunals?


    • Ingot9455 says:

      We are currently in a declared war on terrorism via the Authorization On The Use Of Military Force – that’s one way. We also have executive orders against Human Trafficking which refer back to the very expansive and quite brutal laws against said acts.
      So who knows.


      • cali says:

        I would recommend to read the EO dated 21 Dec 2017 in which the president declared a national security emergency ergo martial law.

        The letter from Michelle Bachmann many years ago requesting Huma Abedin to be investigated. Huma Abedin is a muslim brotherhood member as well as all her family members.
        Michelle Bachmann correctly together with Chuck Grassley questioned the implication on national security.
        One McCain went ape sh$t and together with others and media Michelle was demonized.

        Now its 2018 and Huma Abedin will make it into the spotlight and sunlight.

        Who is Abedin and was she a stealth muslim brotherhood member participating with others in the subversion of our government? The muslim brotherhood charter and activities included a chapter dedicated to infiltrate and overthrow our government from within?
        How many stealth muslim brotherhood agents did Barry placed into the many national security and military defense that included highly sensitive positions throughout government entities? Why?

        Why did Huma forwarded ever email, every video, every pay-to-play, every criminal enterprise and foundation activity and child sex trafficking info with videos of HRC and Huma terrorizing, violating a small child(ren)?

        There is much more on Huma to come!

        Look: Hussein: muslim brotherhood member; Valerie Jarrett: muslim brotherhood member; John Brennan: muslim brotherhood member?!


    • Apollo says:

      How do they trigger military tribunals? They don’t. There are not going to be military tribunals for non-military US citizens caught up in this. Whatever happens is going to happen in the standard civilian court system.

      And whatever it is, it’s absolutely critical that the public parts of it start before the midterms.


  2. lotbusyexec says:

    Nothing is irrational in this farcicalal political witch hunt! I am sure fact is going to be way stranger and egregious than fiction. Carry on and save the foil for cooking (hopefully Comey and company’s hide) 😉


  3. Delibero says:

    This excellent investigative video is likely only an infinitesimal precursor of all of the upcoming videos and discussions that will be generated when the OIG report is released and delivers the true and shocking facts and evidence of systemic.corruption in the previous admin and its various dirty tricksters and other active participants.

    But the DOJ would finally be pressured to concentrate their powerful resources on the actual corrupt side of this coup instead of the framed side and some like stalling Rod will be very reluctant to do so. 1st step would be to fold the Dem dominated Mueller “team” but multiple conflicted Rod will not likely do that either for some time..Rosenstein will presumably drag out the so called “classified” obstruction excuse as a delay tactic for as long as possible–ie. past mid terms as speculated..


  4. jeans2nd says:

    Bulletpoint #5 –
    “Allegations that decisions regarding the timing of the FBI’s release of certain Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) documents on October 30 and November 1, 2016, and the use of a Twitter account to publicize same, were influenced by improper considerations.”

    The link says that is Kadzik.
    “It is also alleged that Kadzik was “influenced by improper considerations” by allowing and releasing FBI documents to the public on October 30th and November 1st, 2016.”

    The link also says “Internal Affairs has also accused Kadzik of allowing Justice Department employees to illegally leak top secret information to the public.”

    There are no links to substantiate those two claims, and “allowing Justice Department employees to illegally leak top secret information to the public” appears to be Andrew McCabe.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s