White House Statement on Russian Election Interference Indictments…

WHITE HOUSE – Earlier today, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announced indictments against 13 Russian nationals and 3 Russian entities for meddling in the 2016 Presidential election, which began in 2014 before the President declared his candidacy. President Donald J. Trump has been fully briefed on this matter and is glad to see the Special Counsel’s investigation further indicates—that there was NO COLLUSION between the Trump campaign and Russia and that the outcome of the election was not changed or affected.

President Trump says, “it is more important than ever before to come together as Americans. We cannot allow those seeking to sow confusion, discord, and rancor to be successful. It’s time we stop the outlandish partisan attacks, wild and false allegations, and far-fetched theories, which only serve to further the agendas of bad actors, like Russia, and do nothing to protect the principles of our institutions. We must unite as Americans to protect the integrity of our democracy and our elections.” (read more)

This entry was posted in Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2016, FBI, media bias, Notorious Liars, NSA, propaganda, Russia, Spying, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

571 Responses to White House Statement on Russian Election Interference Indictments…

    • southernsue says:

      we all knew this
      however, the russians?
      how about obama and hillary the puppets for the real enemy of our whole world,
      the illuminatie consisting of the rothschilds,sa,soros

      these are the real enemies
      and all in the US that has participated with obama and hillary in their attempt to take our country’s sovereignty and sell to the highest bidder

      this whole mueller thing is a joke
      unless this guy is trying to save his butt jail time
      and is now helping root out the rot that is in our political arena


      • Mr Darcy says:

        You are right. The whole thing is a tissue of lies. He can say this “stuff” because he will never have to prove a single word of it in a court because the “defendants” will never be extradited. So he has bought himself some time. He knew there was nothing to be found, but now he can bring obstruction charges against Trump before November. He won’t have to go to trial with those charges, either, but simply making the indictment will do the trick. He and his fellow-travellers have gone too far to stop now, so they HAVE to pursue overthrowing Trump’s government to the bitter end or stop when they themselves are thrown into prison. This is just a delaying action imho.


    • EWEatherwax says:

      If ever there were a perfect historical example of “useful idiots”, the Dems behavior this past 18 months is it.

      “A useful idiot (also useful fool[1], Russian: полезный идиот) is “a dupe of the Communists”, usually a citizen of a non-communist country sympathetic to the Soviet Union who is susceptible to propaganda and is cynically misused.[1][2] The phrase was used by Soviet communists and the KGB to refer to persons in the West their country had successfully manipulated.”

      Liked by 3 people

    • cali says:

      Ad strangely all the 13 Russians indicted by Mueller were all given a visa by none other than John Kerry!
      Mueller the deep state’s best friend had to come up with something as to avoid looking like idiots spending millions of dollars for a crime that never existed.
      Mueller et al knew before hand that there was no collusion and yet kept going.
      Yet they thought they finally could indict Flynn. While they destroyed him financially you will soon find out that this patriot is on par with Admiral Mike Rogers. Why do I say that?
      Because Flynn intentionally admitted to lying to get into the system that he, our president, Michael Rogers and other white hats are in the process to finally bring to justice.

      Flynn took a big risk when he admitted to lying but he as the patriot he always was needed to find and get into that system run by the deep state. It was planned that way.

      The shooting in Florida that just so happen to occur close to presidents estate was nothing more than another false flag. Once again a life fire drill just so happen at the same time. It also just so happen that many newspapers reported this shooting 2 and 3 days prior that kid supposedly shut up the place.
      It also just so happen that Nikolas Cruz was also on psychotropic drugs for some time. Ask yourself the question why it is that each shooting always involves a white kid that are treated by psychiatrists who give mind altering drugs? Look at each supposed shooter and their eyes. They are all empty – there is nobody there. So too Nikolas Cruz looked dazed and confused when they arrested him nearly 2 miles away from the scene. Ask yourself the question how it is that a autistic young men and orphan – losing his mother to pneumonia recently, losing his adoptive father some years ago – on psychotropic drugs hears voices in his head telling him to go shoot people.

      As the deep state continues their evil agenda against president Trump they also must continue with their false flag shooting while hoping to disarm the American citizens who stand in their way to their global government. Each time they can murder more citizens using young white vulnerable males the democrats and rhinos attempt to chip away on the 2nd amendment.

      An armed citizenry is a danger to the NWO gang!


      • Rich says:

        Cali – you are right on the money. How many of our innocent children are going to die in order for the NWO globalist oligarchs stop trying to grab our guns. The only thing preventing our constitutional republic from going down is armed patriots. Clintons and Obama have to go to jail and all their cronies. Unfortunately I doubt we’d ever get Soros, Rothchilds et al as they are way up in the white tower. Doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try. OLIGARCHS – STOP KILLING OUR CHILDREN!


      • NoJuan Importante says:

        How does Flynn pleading guilty to a process felony help him “get into that system run by the deep state?” Hell he was part of the deep state not long ago. I don’t understand this theory and I have read it on Thomas Wictor’s page also and it appears counterproductive. How do we know that Flynn isn’t part of the sting himself? Seriously, in this blood sport, how do you really know?


    • brenrod says:

      sounds to me that those russian troll farms were employed to deep state or hillary… brock, soros, steele…. one of them probably paid the russian troll farms


  1. lfhbrave says:

    Would these Russian indictments make the Schiff memo more releasable? It’s very likely Schill included some of the materials in the indictments in his memo. The indictments would at the same time declassify these materials.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. covfefe999 says:

    And so continues the Democrats’ third straight annus horribilis. 🙂

    Liked by 7 people

  3. Bull Durham says:

    Liked by 22 people

  4. Pam says:

    Liked by 7 people

      • jeff montanye says:

        there is no equivalence but there is, as always, a comparison. the left picture is a transparent, dnc aggrandizing lie or why did the dnc refuse the fbi access to the servers? the right picture refers to a u.s. soldier revealing capital war crimes, nuremberg vulnerable, for which s/he immediately paid a horrific price of seven years imprisonment, sentenced to thirty-five years, at least two suicide attempts, and significant solitary confinement without clothes. done by the pride of the dnc, barack obama. i’d vote for her for the senate if i lived in maryland. and she never told the cops who her contacts to wikileaks were.


        Liked by 1 person

        • TheUnknown Patriot says:

          The real question isn’t whether the DNC refused to let the FBI examine their servers. The real question is why didn’t the FBI WANT to investigate the servers? The more texts I read from Page and Sztrok, the more I pondered this question. If FBI techs got to see the servers, of course they wouldn’t have found evidence of hacking by Russians. Did someone higher up at the FBI make the decision to keep their probably non politicized techs from having access to those computers? Questions I’d love to see asked of Comey, Mccabe etc.

          Liked by 2 people

  5. Pam says:

    Liked by 8 people

    • dagnyshrug says:

      What swayed most people was the thought of Hillary Clinton as POTUS.

      Liked by 12 people

      • WSB says:

        And how fabulous DJT was!!!!!!

        Liked by 2 people

      • jonvil says:

        I did not vote AGAINST Hillary, I voted FOR Donald J. Trump…big difference!!!

        Liked by 1 person

        • jonvil says:

          I should have included this old post:
          After 8 years of the worse president this country has ever experienced, only 54% of eligible voters even bothered to vote in the highly contentious 2016 election.

          27% voted for MAGA (sadly, some of these were the lesser of two evils voters, they voted AGAINST Hillary, not FOR Trump)
          27% voted against MAGA and for the continued destruction of their country
          46% didn’t give a rip what happened to their country and stayed home.

          I have to conclude:
          At least 73% of eligible voters live in a state of self destructive apathetic selfishness, void of logic, reason and common sense.

          This does not bode well for the long term future of America.


        • dagnyshrug says:

          I meant my comment as a jovial jab at Hillary Clinton!

          Although many of his votes were default votes, he seems to be getting some people on board in earnest. Hopefully more will follow.


    • Ree Fungorio says:

      I have to admit that I followed a couple of those before twitter banned me.


    • jeff montanye says:

      thanks a lot. i particularly liked http://archive.is/qyLJM

      i still want to know what law this breaks. no one knows if you’re a dog on the internet.


      • cboldt says:

        The indictment is a poilitical document, filled with gratuitous material. The only possible activity that (maybe) triggers a regulatory violation is buying ads. The rest is first amendment, and it is arguable that ads are first amendment too.


      • dagnyshrug says:

        Jeff–If Mueller can’t find a law he’s sure to create one through some convoluted obscure statute!

        I saw that DHS pushed back against a bogus CBS report where they implied the 13 indictments were tied directly to wrongdoing by PDJT. Of course the dems believe CBS over the primary source.

        There was also one story about a report from DHS due in March that is purported to show massive voter fraud by the DNC which will include specific elections by district/state and implicates Alabama. I am not certain this is true because I only saw it in one place. Can’t find the link again now so it might have been removed.


  6. WSB says:

    Jim Woolsey on Laura Ingraham’s show, prior to the 10:30 time frame…he admits that the US historically and recently has interfered in other countries’ elections!!!!

    Laura catches Woolsey flat footedly admitting VERY recent meddling by the US in other countries’ elections!!!!!!! Obama, anyone?

    Hysterical! If anyone is deft at gathering instant video, many thanks!

    Liked by 9 people

  7. dagnyshrug says:

    The way I see it, all indications point to Clinton and the DNC colluding with Russia. Trump gave Mueller enough rope to hang himself, so Mueller chose a little rope burn over shooting himself in the back of the head–twice.

    Liked by 6 people

  8. bkeyser says:


    I’m not alleging treason, and I’m not a lawyer, but it occurs to me that during the same time the Clinton campaign and the DNC were commissioning opposition research from Russians associated with and/or a part of the Russian government, the Russian government was committing what some are calling an act of war against the United States of America.

    Said another way, the Clinton camp and the DNC were actively colluding with a hostile foreign nation actively involved in the commission of cyberwarfare against our country.

    Does that strike anyone as more than a little concerning?

    Liked by 11 people

    • lizzyp says:

      It is gonna hurt the first few people who are finally forced to decide whether they really believe the rhetoric they’ve been tossing around…like when they were crying for Kushner and Ivanka to be dismissed ASAP because they left something off their financial disclosures, but the Bruce Ohr omission of Fusion payments to his wife – apparently not as bad?

      Liked by 5 people

  9. AloftWalt says:

    Mueller will continue with his witch hunt until he entraps PDJT etal in process crimes unrelated to the SC mandate. Example: additional charges being heaped on Manafort. Why wouldn’t all of these indictments fall under “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine? Is he using the Russian indictments as evidence of collusion to justify his mandate in order to make all of the process crime charges stick?


    • Trump himself wants to talk to Mueller. There is nothing on Trump. Up to now Mueller is exposing more swamp than he protects…

      Liked by 2 people

      • AloftWalt says:

        Many who are much wiser that me say and I agree that if PDJT is deposed, they will trip him up with a perjury charge.

        Liked by 2 people

          • jeff montanye says:

            prez should negotiate very slowly regarding the still very sensitive and litigable topic of forced presidential testimony outside of impeachment proceedings. as precedent is not in his favor though (nixon, clinton) probably not litigating is best. the political winds seem straight in mueller’s face and rising up the saffir-simpson scale. i want to know how to discreetly bring up mueller’s performance in the 9-11 investigation which is accessory, at least after the fact, to mass murder and perhaps the greatest treason in the history of the republic (at least the confederates were open about it and took their losses). i think that trumps a process crime.


            • cboldt says:

              Clinton v. Jones was a filed and active civil case. It was judicial power that would have been offended, plus justice delayed is justice denied, that forced Clinton to testify before leaving office. Note too, Clinton was defendant in that civil case.
              I know of no case where testimony has been compelled from a president, to facilitate a criminal investigation or prosecution. But there is no question a president can be compelled to testify if his testimony is necessary (evidence cannot be obtained any other way) to advance justice. He can;t be compelled to testify to advance a fishing expedition.
              Reports are that Trump’s lawyers have demanded that Mueller disclose the specific criminal investigation underway, that requires Trump’s testimony. If the criminal investigation is against him (a risible proposition), he has fifth amendment privilege.

              Liked by 2 people

              • beach lover says:

                just a thought.. is there any way Mueller can use this porn star’s allegations and payments that were made (by his lawyer) to try to get to Trump? Could that be obstruction in any way?


    • Carrie2 says:

      AloftWalt, actually Mueller is busy creating his own defeat and punishment along with Rosenstein. Both are involved and both are seeking ways to move the blame onto Russians and not the FBI cabal and some Congress members. Gee, this is more entertaining than my latest mystery!


    • Mueller is the only speaking role left into the Russian Collusion narrative for the Dems. Only the Second Coming can shut him down. You can’t catch process crimes in your net unless you maintain an active process.

      Liked by 1 person

    • beach lover says:

      This could be a timing ploy by Mueller to lure Trump into sitting down with him. Let Trump think he is in the clear, but we all know Mueller isn’t done with Trump, yet. He just said he didn’t collude. Well, duh. No evidence was that there for collusion.. with Trump and the Russians. BUT, Comey wants obstruction charges.. it’s why he wanted Mueller and a SP. Unless he is taking the dossier seriously and looking into Hillary’s involvement with Steele then there’s nothing Mueller can do to prove to us he is serious about finding true wrongdoings in the past election.

      Again, I don’t trust him. Just a side thought, though. Maybe Mueller will take on some of the Clinton/dossier stuff, just to get it under his purview and prevent anyone else from investigating it?! The last thing Mueller wants is another SP to show the country the fix was in with his team.


  10. truthbomb says:

    Great. But to think the CIA was not the main actor in this all is a little unbelievable.


  11. silverlakela says:

    Sharyl Attkisson discusses the origins of “Fake News” TEDx video
    How WaPo, BuzzFeed, And Soros-Backed Group Pushed The Phrase “Fake News” Until It Backfired

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Rynn69 says:

    The Mueller investigation is now unequivocally a stain on the DOJ, RINO Never Trumpers, and the Democrats. This will be known as the greatest witch hunt in US history, a complete farce costing taxpayers millions of unnecessary dollars. Every single person involved in this should refund the taxpayer every red cent.


    • Josh says:

      I dont think so. I feel this was a premeditated move to actually downplay the collusion narrative by saying hey we did fid guilty russians and the guillble always say but didnt they plead guilty. I suspect this is what they were going for as indicated below


  13. Josh says:

    Has anyone though that mullers intentions was to sell the russian meddling to the public as they will believe it. Then obama, comey, hillary get of lightly saying ok some lines might have been crossed but we really believed it and its a fact now russia has meddled with the elections. Who knows muller and his guys might even get few of these guys to plead guilty. Also very interesting move from bush who was giving a speech in middle east reciting the same thing “russia meddled with the elections”. Either they put him upto it or he is in it as well. I strongly feel this is their strategy and the msm has sold it to the guillible people so it would be very hard to indiye and imprison them now without civil unrest. Look at the universities they are already in meltdown with shapiro and milo.


  14. Ldave says:

    Good morning fellow patriots. As we encounter the leftist talking points on this indictment let’s remember that Mueller mentioned no ties to the Russian government or Putin. We don’t know who paid these people.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Red Frog says:

      My guess is FusionGPS paid these guys. The FBI is totally disinterested in that tho. From SA Russo on the Las Vegas shooting “you need us”, Rosenstein at his hearing “you need us..” On the Florida shooting “Oops, my bad”.


  15. William Dorritt says:

    6,000 top Civil Service Employees
    How many are dual passport, many, most or the vast majority ????
    The Federal Govt is 94% Dems including lots of fanatics


  16. Zippy says:

    Mueller’s Investigation A Farce: Files Joke Indictment Against Russian Trolls



    Time reported the opinion of a lawyer at the Campaign Legal Center who characterized Correct The Record as: “creating new ways to undermine campaign regulation.”

    The New York Daily News put the matter most bluntly: “Hillary Clinton camp now paying online trolls to attack anyone who disparages her online.” The LA Times described the active election interference: “It is meant to appear to be coming organically from people and their social media networks in a groundswell of activism, when in fact it is highly paid and highly tactical.”

    Despite obvious hypocrisy given the actions of Shareblue and David Brock’s Correct The Record, corporate media ignored all double standards and attempted to report on “Russian twitter trolling” with a straight face. Business Insider wrote: “Russian Twitter Trolls Tried To Bury Or Spin Negative Trump News Just Before Election,” as if that wasn’t what Correct The Record spent millions on doing for the benefit of Clinton.

    The double standards applied to Clinton for her benefit goes beyond hypocrisy. Many have claimed that constantly metamorphosing allegations of Russian interference represents an insidious effort to silence dissent and anti-establishment political discourse: for example, by turning third-party, anti-establishment or conservative voices into “Russians” by proxy of their opposition to Clinton.

    By converting legitimate American free speech into insidious “Russian bots,” a pretext is created to silence dissent across the board. Without the Russian interference circus, the efforts to breach the First Amendment would be overtly authoritarian and would be inexcusable even by the most corrupt establishment media standards.

    The results of such a clamp-down on free and effective speech have manifested in censorship crackdowns across large social media platforms including Twitter, Youtube, and Facebook, with Twitter admitting to actively censoring roughly 48% of tweets that included the “#DNCEmails” hashtag. It seems anyone with an opinion the establishment doesn’t like is liable to be memory-holed.


  17. Just Beachy says:

    It looks to me like Trump has a good (not Russia related) reason to relieve some FBI leadership of their responsibilities. And as for those bad apples left: Stop texting and do your damn jobs or you’re next.


  18. Zippy says:

    Russian Investigation Offers a Ludicrous Indictment
    February 17, 2018



    Rosenstein noted that the Russians had posted 176,000 tweets in ten weeks, and that 50,258 accounts had been created and tweeted a million times. The tweets presumably were slanted with anti-Hillary bias. The “interference” began during the nomination season, and the Russians, according to Rosenstein (the reader will please excuse my skepticism), preferred Bernie Sanders or Donald Trump. To put this tweet threat in perspective, the reader should know that there are 500 million tweets on average generated every day on Twitter. If the total number of Russian tweets were concentrated on one day, that would still come to only 0.00352% of all the tweets on that day. If it were one million tweets over a five-month period, that would come to 0.0000235% of all tweets over that period. What an impact those tweets must have had!

    Rosenstein also informed us that the massive Russian interference generated 129 real-world events that drew 340,000 Facebook users. If we look at the number of mobile active Facebook users for December 2016, we see that there were 1.74 billion. Thus, the Russians commandeered 0.000195402% of the Facebook users for that one month. Again, we can see how incredibly destructive such a program must have been. The figures are so ludicrous that one can only wonder why the Russians ever believed that they could have a significant impact. And, looking at the stats, we must be drawn to the conclusion that the Democrats have not only been making a mountain out of a mole hill, but been making a veritable Mt. Everest out of an anthill.


  19. Zippy says:

    Christopher Steele: The Real Foreign Influence in the 2016 Election?
    His dossier was more than opposition research, it was part of a full-spectrum information operation.
    February 15, 2018



  20. Jane Mataczynski says:

    Perhaps off base question but I don’t know who else to ask…what happened to Imperator Rex on Twitter?


  21. Doc Moore says:

    “We must unite as Americans to protect the integrity of our democracy and our elections.” A rather basic goal that will only be possible if the majority of currently elected and so-called “Democrats” are removed from office, and or jailed as may be appropriate in many cases.


    • James F says:

      According to the Americans, they went even higher: Mr. Dresner had ties to Dick Morris, the Republican strategist who advises President Clinton and asked Mr. Morris to ask Mr. Clinton to call Mr. Yeltsin and urge him to appear in his political ads. The consultants were unable to say whether the American President had called his counterpart in the Kremlin to offer campaign tips, but expressed pride in the fact that soon after, Mr. Yeltsin decided to appear in the advertisements.


  22. Mike diamond says:

    Our own liberal news media tried to get Hillary elected,it was not Russia! Obama tried to interfere with Israels elections ! The news media won’t talk about that!!! That tape showing Obama asking the Russian leader to help him get elected his second term should be played every day on the evening news ! But it won’t! They cover for Obama! Conservatives know our news media is fake news,and they cover for all liberal wrong doings! Shame on the liberal media!


  23. Rynn69 says:

    I hear this investigation is about Russian collusion and election interference. Could you please investigate the following instances of election interference?

    1. Obama stating on MiTu You Tube channel that illegal aliens should go vote in the Presidential election of 2016 when they do not legally have the right to vote in US elections.
    2. WikiLeaks email dumps exposing DNC colluding with candidate Clinton to rig 2016 Democrat Presidential primaries against Bernie Sanders.
    3. DNC and Clinton campaign financing a phony dossier on the opposition Presidential candidate, engaging with a foreign government to do it, colluding with FBI-DOJ-Obama administration officials to utilize this dossier to obtain FISA warrants to surveil the opposition candidate before, during, and after the election to prevent Trump from becoming President and to stop him after elected.
    4. CNN contributor Donna Brazile providing Presidential candidate Clinton questions prior to a televised Presidential debate.
    5. On election night, it was noted several key swing states held off calling election results for many hours while heavily Democrat precincts in cities/county seats were rumored to be trying to produce enough votes to tip the election . . . which has been alleged as a scheme by Democrats in past elections. In addition, there is the alleged situations with Nevada and New Hampshire, known for bussing in non-resident voters in surrounding states to vote in those states and also tip the election. This is a huge threat to our Democracy.

    Thank you.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s