Trial Balloon – Sara Carter and Dan Bongino Discuss The Steele Dossier and The DOJ/FBI FISA Abuse…

Dan Bongino does a great job in this interview. Sara Carter, plays the role of controlled opposition.  Carter shiftily helps Hillary Clinton deal with her “Dossier Problem“.

Unfortunately, but not unpredictably, Sara Carter begins deploying deep state ‘countermeasures’ from her ‘sources’ that are telling her Fusion GPS, Christopher Steele and Hillary Clinton was hoodwinked by a comprehensive Russian disinformation campaign; carried out by professional Russian intelligence agents; who duped the Clinton Campaign into THINKING Trump was a proxy political agent of Russia.

Ergo,… the ever patriotic Clinton campaign had no other option, except to do their civic  duty, and inform the FBI of the Russian claims… and that led to the entire FBI operation investigating candidate Donald Trump.   Thankfully, Donald Trump wasn’t a Russian spy.

Well, there’s the trial balloon narrative from those at risk within the Deep State Clinton group, and there’s Sara Carter testing it out for them:

Why does the DOJ leak to Sara Carter?  Remember the text messages leak?

” SEE HERE “

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2016, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, Russia, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

824 Responses to Trial Balloon – Sara Carter and Dan Bongino Discuss The Steele Dossier and The DOJ/FBI FISA Abuse…

  1. Suncc49 says:

    She dumber than a bag of rocks if she expects people to believe that narrative….

    Liked by 9 people

    • scott467 says:

      “She dumber than a bag of rocks if she expects people to believe that narrative….”

      ________________

      It’s just typical contempt for the viewing audience.

      Liked by 8 people

    • jakee308 says:

      Does it matter if Clinton was “duped”? That may provide cover for her activities (but only as far as the Dossier is concerned) but it doesn’t cover those who used unverified claims or gossip disguised as information to subvert the flawed process of FISA to obtain permission to spy on American citizens.

      This is so much fantasy that it defies belief. Do they really think we’ll fall for that? Of the woman, family and associates known for double underhanded dealings for fun and profit?

      The woman is a pathological liar. And her sense of patriotism is surely nonexistent.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Hillary was duped by Russians running a counterintelligence operation? More BS blaming the Russians!!! The Obama Administration, FBI, DOJ-NSD, CIA, NSA, DNI, the DNC and Hillary’s campaign DID THIS, not the damn Russians! I’ll bet Russian President Putin is sick of this nonsense. I know I sure am!

        Hillary’s campaign and the DNC paid tens of millions of dollars thru their law firm for the dossier months AFTER Fusion GPS was given access by the FBI to raw FISA data collections? After Fusion GPS was permitted to query this data, utilized the “about query” searches?

        The Democrats have been engaged in duping us all for decades! Russian counterintelligence operation, my A$$ This trial balloon won’t fly!

        Liked by 1 person

    • tails6 says:

      Looked like she had a hard time keeping a straight face. She knows what she is saying is bs. She is simply telling the world that this is how HRC/Swamp is going to respond.

      Liked by 4 people

  2. scott467 says:

    Silly Sara Gowdy: “it appears… that this was a disinformation campaign by the Russians! So the Russians actually used this dossier” — Jesse Waters sighs sympathetically: “yeah”…

    Silly Sara continues: “…to put in false information”.

    Jesse: “So we either got duped by the Russians or Hillary paid for the duping herself and…” — Sara interrupts “and unknowingly, yeah!” — Jesse continues: “…either way it’s completely embarrassing and has led to a lot of these investigations.”

    _________________

    SOMETHING is completely embarrassing.

    Like this interview segment, lol!

    Liked by 6 people

    • woohoowee says:

      Henhead Carter. LOL!

      Liked by 4 people

    • teekay says:

      Andrew C. McCarthy floated the Russian Disinformation Hypothesis almost a month ago:

      “The second reason to hope the dossier was not used [for a FISA warrant] is more alarming. If the FBI and Justice Department relied on it, this would very likely mean that they fell victim to an influence operation, based on false information, by Russian intelligence services. Steele’s sources are unidentified Russians, at least some of whom knew Steele to be a spy for hire. It is possible, if not likely, that these Russians fed Steele false information in order to see if Western intelligence services would bite and, if the Kremlin got lucky, to sow discord and chaos into the American political system.”

      http://www.nationalreview.com/article/454709/steele-dossier-source-fisa-warrant-against-trump-campaign

      Liked by 3 people

      • Never Say Anything says:

        I’ve been floating the Russian disinformation hypothesis since last year. Unfortunately I don’t have a “blog” to do it so no one cares. Everyone poo poo’ed my idea, but now it looks like the MSM is on board.

        It’s the only thing that ever made sense to me. I never believed Trump was a Russian, but I never believed that the Dems invented the whole story either. I knew, as is almost always the case in life, that the truth was somewhere in the middle.

        However, just because the Dems didn’t “invent” it doesn’t mean there weren’t many crimes committed by them falling for it and using it to obtain FISA warrants. Their hatred of Trump was so intense that they suffered from confirmation bias in that they couldn’t look at the “Russia” evidence objectively. If a real intelligence analyst on the inside really studied all the intel reports, interviewed people, and used some logic, they would come to the same conclusion as I did.

        Perhaps there were some people on the inside who *did* come to this conclusion, but Clapper and Brennan were so blinded by Trump hatred that they “edited” the report to fit their narrative. I think Clapper and Brennan know what happened, but they didn’t care. They were going to use Russia’s disinformation efforts to run a disinformation campaign of their own. There’s little risk in that because if anyone questions their conclusions they can always argue “Well we did the best we could with the information we had.”.

        And of course, Hillary/Fusion were all too happy to help in that effort. That’s where people like Page (CIA) and George P. (Fusion) come into play. They were sent to monitor and/or entrap the Trump campaign. Page was sent as a co-intel agent just to monitor and George P. was either an FBI or Fusion plant meant to try and entrap Trump’s people into “meeting with Russians.”

        We just got played by Putin and it was brilliant on his end. He has totally dragged our government to a halt by doing nothing but spreading rumors. Very little investment for a huge pay-off. The American MSM did the bidding of Russia without realizing it. Sad!

        Like

    • Patriot1783 says:

      Someone who is a true investigative reporter would never in a million years describe Hillary Clinton as “unknowingly”

      Always a means to an end with the clinton crime family never unknowingly.

      Liked by 6 people

      • Never Say Anything says:

        No one is arguing that Clinton was “unknowing.” I think we’re arguing that they didn’t *care* one way or the other what was true or wasn’t true- they just wanted to smear Trump. So they hired a political operative firm in D.C. to do it for them.

        Sometime in or around April, Fusion hires Inspector Clouseau (Chris Steele) to go to Russia and get the word on the street. Fusion didn’t care whether the Russians were telling the truth – they just ran with it and spread it to the media ASAP. Glenn Simpson admitted he made no attempts whatsoever to verify Steele’s memos.

        At some point Steele meets an FBI man in Rome and hands him the dossier. The FBI scoffed at it and never reported back. Steele got angry that the Feds weren’t acting (according to Simpson) so he said “screw it” and just continued on with his “investigation.” This time Steele would go to the media and not the FBI.

        At some point the FBI’s incredulity changed. Evidently the top brass at the FBI (who are all partisan hacks) got wind of the dossier and decided to “take it seriously” (could it be that the election was getting close? No way!) By July/August, the the FBI’s collusion with Steele begun and this is the very month Strzok bragged about his insurance policy.

        Since the FBI had zero evidence (and they knew it) of Trump being a Russian agent, they decided to either collude with Fusion or “look the other way” as Fusion fabricated evidence and attempted to entrap Don, Jr. at Trump tower. We know this for a FACT at this point. The Trump tower meeting was a setup – zero doubt about it now. Simpson met with the Russian attendees both the day before and the day after those same Russians went to Trump tower. (Simpson actually claimed in his testimony it was sheer coincidence. lulz).

        If you will recall, Don, Jr. said he was very confused by the whole meeting. Don, Jr. admits he wanted to hear dirt on Hillary but the Russian lady kept talking about the Magnitsky Act and Russian orphans. Junior was like “WTF is this about” and shut the meeting down after about 20 minutes.

        (As a side note: I submit for your perusal the hypothesis that poor Veselnitskaya didn’t KNOW that Don expected dirt – I think Fusion used her without her knowledge. Why do I say that? Because Veselnitskaya was already working on the Magnitsky Act and the Prevezon case. It’s feasible that Simpson merely tricked her into thinking she really was going to talk to Junior about Russian adoptions. Not saying this is right, but it’s something to consider).

        In any case, that meeting is all Fusion needed. They never intended to give dirt because they were *working* for Hillary. But at this point, in their minds, they had verifiable proof that “Russia” was meeting with Don, Jr. in Trump tower. Wham, bam, we got means, motive and opportunity, boys. We got ’em now, right? Wrong.

        Now their whole plan has unraveled and they’ve been found out. The Storm is coming and some heads are about to roll. I hope Simpson and Steele (and their collaborators inside the FBI) saved some of that Hillary money for good attorneys.

        Like

        • Patriot1783 says:

          You obviously didn’t don’t watch the video or you would have realized the point of my comment.
          But your heavily worded response of already known info is obviously more important to you so bless your heart.

          Liked by 1 person

    • starfcker says:

      Scott, you hit the key part, “unknowingly”. I’ve always thought she was too breathlessly earnest. And waaaaaay too conected for a nobody. Sundance pegged her early. Deeep operative, and then one day, something stirs, and IT’S ALIVE. Doing the job it’s programmed to do. Think Ted Cruz. You start to get an idea how broad and deep the corruption runs. My God, this is going to be a mess.

      Liked by 9 people

    • Disgusted says:

      The other guy also said something like she was spot on, too! Why did anyone watch these people?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Kaco says:

        Dan was talking about Sundance’s reporting, now he’s falling for this crap from Sara?

        Like

        • scott467 says:

          “Dan was talking about Sundance’s reporting, now he’s falling for this crap from Sara?”

          ____________

          Kaco,

          As I just posted in reply to a similar observation to yours:

          I suspect Dan was not listening carefully to what Silly Sara said, thinking instead about what he was wanting to say when he got a chance to jump in.

          That’s the only spin that makes sense, considering Bongino’s recent (and on target) coverage.

          Like

      • scott467 says:

        “The other guy also said something like she was spot on, too! Why did anyone watch these people?”

        _____________

        The other guy is Dan Bongino, former Secret Service detail (and protected Crooked Hillary at one time), and he has been all over these revelations recently (in a good way), so I suspect Dan was not listening carefully to what Silly Sara said, thinking instead about what he was wanting to say when he got a chance to jump in.

        That’s the only spin that makes sense, considering Bongino’s recent (and on target) coverage.

        Liked by 1 person

  3. M. Mueller says:

    Anyone following Q – lots of new ones dumped https://qcodefag.github.io/

    CBTS 8 chan guys & Corsi going through them live now. Interesting! I’m reading them on 1st link, while listening to the youtube. Big stuff in these posts.

    Liked by 11 people

  4. POTUS Fan says:

    is Sara carter and amanda carter sisters. Amanda worked for Cruz and is now at CNN ragging on POTUS every chance she gets. Maybe its all in the family.

    Like

  5. Streak 264 says:

    The Deep State intel community will go down in history as the worlds dumbest criminals.

    Liked by 3 people

  6. johnparham1 says:

    Whoa! Sara Carter a plant/tool? Now I’m getting worried. How is it possible that ‘the Russians dis-informed me’ is a viable excuse?! The dossier was not fact-checked and yet brought before a court. Is that not still treason/collusion?!

    I’m on board with the ‘laundered FBI collected intelligence that was fed to Steele and then fed back to the DOJ,’ BUT . . .

    Somebody please clarify. Thanks! Is the above not still treason/collusion?!

    Somebody help me out here, please.

    Liked by 1 person

    • MNGal says:

      Didn’t Sarah Carter just get hired by FOX?

      Liked by 2 people

    • Lee Caylor says:

      If this story line was indeed true and the Russians did make fools out of intelligence organizations, there is only one solution. Fire everyone that touched the information because they are totally incompetent. They are so incompetent they represent a threat to the security of the USA every day they stay employed.

      Liked by 7 people

      • Esperanza says:

        Putin had to know this was going on. Prolly eating Russky version of popcorn as we speak.

        If you look at it from Putin’s point of view, Hillary good short term because bought off and you can walk all over her and do what you want. Trump good long term because good for the West. Also I suspect Putin would prefer to deal with Trump because he’s very interesting and a first class opponent.

        I’ve never believed the Russian angle. Russia never had a dog in this fight. The UK establishment on the other hand….

        The only verified agent is British.

        Liked by 2 people

    • KBR says:

      I was watching an old-IDK-maybe 2012-2013?era of a satellite image- on a show on TV. Called “What on Earth.”
      (Its lame, it’s scripted, but)

      it shows satellite images of odd looking things on earth surface and then goes into the reconstruction of showing how many experts gave an opinion of what it was. Sarah Carter was introduced as some govmt type expert who reviewed satellite photos officially for national security.

      Hard to say if she actually did do that sort of thing for a living. Work for some National Security Organization (IC.)

      I think she is an IC plant, not a journalist. But then I think a few of the journalists are IC anyway, or IC stoogies.

      Liked by 1 person

      • wheatietoo says:

        After reading your comment, I was curious so I looked up her on Linked-In.

        You can that here:

        https://www.linkedin.com/in/sara-carter-b0941448/

        Looks like she worked as a War Correspondent in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Middle East…from 2007 to 2013.
        First with The Washington Times, then with Washington Examiner.

        So maybe that’s one of the things she did in that period — review satellite images.

        After that, she was with The Blaze for 2 yrs, then in 2015 went back to the Mid East for a year, doing correspondent work.

        I’ve watched that ‘What On Earth’ show too, so I know which one you’re talking about.
        It’s kinda lame, yes, but interesting, because of things like this:


        .
        Satellite image of Medicine Hat Indian Head in Canada.

        Like

        • KBR says:

          The images are interesting, and they are why I watch sometimes.

          The bit showing the various scenarios of possibilities of what might be is the lame part: obviously the images were really analyzed months or years previous to this show.

          The reenactment by silly people/daft actors/disinfo agents, and some rather stupid hypotheses are mentioned. The “conclusions” are sometimes daft too: deliberate disinfo?

          Liked by 1 person

        • KBR says:

          Oh, and it generally is not the duty of a press correspondent to examine and opine about satellite images in war zones, is it?

          I can’t see General Mattis putting up with his very well trained military recognizance troops, saying,

          “Well since the US MILITARY has no capability nor expertise in interpreting satellite images in war zones, so

          let’s call in that young female press correspondent for her opinion. ”

          Maddog would have his “Military expert” for lunch, and look for himself.

          Liked by 1 person

      • Love22dm says:

        Maybe National Reconnaissance Organization?

        Like

  7. woohoowee says:

    Isn’t that admitting Mueller serves no purpose and shouldn’t have been appointed?

    Liked by 18 people

    • sundance says:

      Yes, actually it is.

      Like I said yesterday, the Democrats have a “Dossier Problem”. It would appear they are willing to concede the Mueller angle (which was always going nowhere), dispatch the “small group” to the fire and fury of congress, and attempt to protect the big fish.

      Liked by 27 people

    • wheatietoo says:

      Yes. Yes it does.

      The whole investigation was based on a Huge Lie…a hoax, if you will.

      All of the people who ‘verified’ the Huge Lie, are political operatives embedded in govt positions.
      They have been engaged in Illegal Activities for so long…they had their own motivations for trying to destroy Trump.
      They were afraid of being prosecuted for what they’ve been doing.

      Liked by 14 people

      • Exactly! They’re trying to escape the consequences of their corruption. This is a gigantic scandal. Dozens of men and women are at risk of going to prison.

        The Democrats don’t really hate President Trump or any of us. They just don’t want to pay for the wrong they’ve done. They are rats on a sinking ship. So pathetic to live such a corrupt, devious, sinful existence! I’m so disgusted!

        Liked by 1 person

  8. tunis says:

    Does anyone believe any of these Deep State characters will actually be prosecuted? Or will they all skate with a light slap on the wrist. Like that Petraeus guy with 4 stars!

    Like

    • Ari says:

      Trump and Sessions will bury them for sure. Trump did the epic beatdown on Bannon and he is a little guppy that was messing with Trump’s administration and family. Something on this level is going to result in a shock and awe response like hasn’t been seen since Lincoln and the Civil War.

      Liked by 12 people

    • I think President Trump and his administration are about as outraged and offended by the corruption committed by our government as We The People are. I don’t see the President letting anyone off the hook. When he ran on bringing back respect for law and order, I think he meant it. I don’t see him letting anybody escape justice. America cannot be a nation of laws if we don’t apply those laws to everybody.

      Like

  9. RedBallExpress says:

    All three know whats going down. Once again it reminds me of Jack Ruby shooting Lee Harvey Oswald. Its like a slow motion movie directed by Sundance that no one can stop.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Greg says:

    Oh please! Hillary’s team a victim of Russian disinformation! These people have no shame. Never the truth, always spin and positioning. I hope Trump takes no prisoners.

    Liked by 12 people

    • Never Say Anything says:

      No, Hillary’s team just jumped on the Russia rumors that were already out there. Their goal wasn’t the truth, but a specified outcome. If they could make it seem there really *was* something to the bogus Trump/Russia connection, all the better. That’s where Steele comes in. He goes to Russia, listens to a bunch of disinformation from Russian actors then writes it as if it’s truth. The Russians KNEW what he was doing and why and they were happy to play along.

      Then the Russian lawyer comes along. She had already been working with Fusion on the Matnitsky Act (public record) and Glenn Simpson had the idea to send her to Trump Tower to entrap Don, Jr. Remember, Fusion is a political smear organization for hire – there’s lots of them in D.C. Their job isn’t the “truth” but to push a narrative and spread it in the media.

      TL;DR – Russia was real at first – they really were screwing around. Hillary hears the rumors and hires Fusion. Fusion knows their clients want results, so they begin fabricating evidence. At some point they share it with the FBI and the anti-Trump FBI begins colluding with Fusion (this is probably where the serious crimes occurred). I hope Congres/DoJ get to the bottom of the FBI/Fusion connection.

      Like

      • Kaco says:

        Sorry, even if Steele didn’t write the damn thing himself, and he went to Russia, they knew darn well what they were doing, didn’t care it told a ridiculous “golden showers” account, they probably laughed and said, what the heck, keep it in!

        It ain’t “The Russians”. It’s ALL them! Orchestrating this whole set up to make it seem legit and it’s the farthest from it. Their whole operation was NOT legit as they concocted it themselves, with or without the Russians’ help.

        Liked by 4 people

        • V says:

          Agreed.
          Before I read yrs above, I noted on pg 1 of the comments that there are various American spellings of words in the “Steele” Dossier, such as behavior, focused, targeting, organization, organized, favor. And in other places in the Dossier the same words are spelled the British way: organised, organisation, favours.

          This would indicate it was written by American(s) trying to impersonate Brits or partly written by Americans.

          Like

          • V says:

            Even mixed American and British spellings on the same page. E.g., pg 5 has American spellings “targeting” and “organization” BUT ALSO British spelling “favours.”

            Pg 28 has American spelling “favor.”

            Like

          • Kaco says:

            I have gone back and reviewed your post, very interesting detail you have pointed out! How much you want to bet our FBI, namely Strozek (sp) wrote it and collaborated with Steele to concoct this tale! I can’t say, but it isn’t presented as written by a Brit as you have pointed out.

            Like

      • What “Russia rumors already out there?” Could you possibly be more vague? As far as I can tell the only Russia rumors were fabricated by democrats.

        Liked by 3 people

        • Never Say Anything says:

          Intelligence reports were already coming in 2015 that Russians were trying to influence candidates, but all of it stayed locked away tightly inside foreign intel agencies. I don’t think anyone on the inside knew exactly what the Russians were planning at the time. It was more of a “wait and see” approach.

          Then it started making it’s way to the media slowly (especially after the DNC hack became public) and was sort of simmering there for a while. People in the public were just now hearing about Russia and Trump was making jokes on the trail about it. Eventually Hillary/Fusion picked up on it and decided to use the Trump/Russia narrative as a campaign strategy.

          Obama and his team inside the west wing (and probably the FBI as well) were using the NSA to unmask Trump’s people under 702 and catching them “incidentally” in foreign collection (Samantha Power made 300+ requests BY HERSELF in 2016). They were *already* doing this before the primaries were even over. Mike Rogers at NSA hears about it in April, reviews the requests, and says “Shit, I have got to go to the FISC to self report these violations”. The FISA court agreed with Rogers that it was a major issue and completely shut down 702 (17) for a period of months. The secret documents of the FISA proceedings were released under FOIA in 2017 and they showed that the FBI were requesting raw NSA intercepts and handing them off to “third parties.” Rogers goes back to the court in October and says his technical solution (to basically block the bad actors in the FBI) wasn’t working and he needs time to come up with something.

          The next month, Rogers meets with Trump at Trump Tower and the very next day Trump leaves Trump tower and moves all of his operations to NJ (coincidence, I am sure). Clapper is furious and tells Obama that Rogers has to go.

          Starting around July, the FBI was pursing their own bogus FISA warrants to tap individual people inside the U.S. (this would allow them to collect ALL communications instead of relying on “about queries” which were mostly gossip overseas ABOUT Trump). It was after the FBI investigation started that all the leaking began – the NYT, Wapo, BBC (and others) began reporting on “wiretaps.” These leaks really picked up in December/January. The thing is, though, I don’t think the NYT understood exactly the significance of it. Their goal of course, was to push Trump/Russia by saying “See we have proof from wiretaps.” What they didn’t realize is that their admission of “wiretaps” made a lot of people say “Wait a minute, one president was wiretapping the transition of the incoming president-elect? WTF is this?” (No one at the NYT seemed to find it odd that one president was wire-tapping the incoming president. If Obama was doing it, it must be OK). In any case, it was March or so that Republicans in Congress began smelling something fishy with this whole wiretapping issue and suddenly the Dems shut down all the public Congressional hearings. Weird, huh? All future hearings (to this day) have been behind closed doors. The Dems didn’t want the public to see Republicans grilling the intelligence community about illegal wiretaps. No, the Dems wanted to pontificate from the podium about Stone and Page and when the Republicans wouldn’t go along, the Dems shut down all public hearings.

          An interesting note about the wiretap reporting in the MSM: We later learned that all of these “incriminating” wiretaps they were reporting on (by their own admission) involved Russians talking to OTHER RUSSIANS. No one bothered to ask the obvious question (except me, of course): What if this is all disinformation by the Russians? Why are we believing it? The Russians saw with their own eyes how much of a shit show our media had become, how divided the public was over Trump, and they loved every minute of it. If they could sew more division and mistrust among the public (and the Dems), then mission accomplished! They don’t *need* to “own” a candidate when they have the insane left-wing media (and their crazy Dem cohorts in Congress) to do the work for them.

          Like

    • Another Scott says:

      If she continues with that line at least we can come back with something like “You were so dumb you thought the dossier was all true? I’m sure glad you didn’t win the election”

      Liked by 3 people

    • Me too. Burn it all down except that which is constitutional. No quarter and all the way to the globalist controller interest not at all fed nor is it a reserve. Anyone that doesn’t think the “owners” of the private central cartel aren’t major players must not want to go there…
      Who created the psycho-political system known as UniParty then?

      Expect No Mercy!

      The fun version… lol

      Liked by 1 person

  11. albrevin says:

    let’s see….

    HRC is to dumb to know how to use a Blackberry and iPhone?

    she’s to dumb to know how to delete a file (you mean like with a cloth or something?)

    she’s to dumb to know a terrorist attack from a youtube video?

    she’s to dumb to know why she’s not 50 points ahead?

    she’s to dumb to know her husband was sleeping with bimbo’s?

    now, she’s is too dumb to know she was being duped by Russians, our greatest enemy ever?

    And, this is the person the Democrat/uniparty/neverTrumper crew put up for POTUS?

    Liked by 15 people

  12. Southpaw says:

    That only comports for the information that is publicly available. The whole corruption goes deeper and way back. They are going to have to morph their public personas into progressive patriots of the new world order who are being persecuted by flat earth partisans while trying to save the planet.

    Liked by 2 people

  13. woohoowee says:

    They’re offering to make Mueller go away and keep their stooges from rioting? Is that it? They’re not in control anymore! No deal!

    Liked by 11 people

  14. Ackman420 says:

    Should I even waste my time watching Hannity anymore? I have to admit that I do get tired (worn out?) listening to him. There isn’t much else on TV pulling in our direction, though. Maybe I should just revert to my previous TV viewing habits, before PDJT, which was NOTHING. I should know better. That’s why I’m here.

    Liked by 6 people

    • wheatietoo says:

      Hannity manages to slip in some small kernels of Truth in his shows…in spite of his handlers.

      Hannity is Not a Republican. Never has been.
      So I will continue to watch him.
      I think he’s doing what he can to help, but he’s under pressure to tow the line or get fired.

      Liked by 5 people

      • LCSmom says:

        He has on really smart, thoughtful people like Peter Schweitzer and then only asks him one question, and interrupts his answer. And he’s gotten very loud lately, like by talking louder and sterner he will be taken more seriously.

        And he is at least two days behind on what is going on. He just bugs me.

        Liked by 5 people

        • wheatietoo says:

          I agree with all of that.
          But…who else have we got?

          We’ve got internet sources, yes…but who else is on tv that is even tepidly, remotely, attempting to tell the truth?

          There are a few on Fox, like Tucker, Hannity, Ingraham, Dobbs…and that’s it.

          I just like to see for myself what they’re managing to get on the air.

          And I think that Hannity tries to spread out a story over as many shows as he can…like Rush does.
          That’s why he interrupts people.
          I don’t like it.
          But as I said, who else have we got.

          Liked by 3 people

  15. woohoowee says:

    Thank goodness President Trump45 did not nuke ’em! The White Hats are going to win this time 🙂

    Like

  16. nimrodman says:

    So this is the masquerade or false-flag fairytale that it was McCain who provided the dossier to FBI, as if otherwise they wouldn’t have known about it? In a nutshell?

    Testimony: John McCain Associate Initiated Contact with Ex-Spy Steele to Obtain Trump Dossier
    http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2018/01/12/testimony-john-mccain-associate-initiated-contact-with-fusion-gps-to-obtain-trump-dossier/

    Liked by 1 person

    • Deborah @UnTamedInSD says:

      either way he is up to his eyeballs in the attempted coup

      Liked by 5 people

    • Never Say Anything says:

      No one is saying McCain is the first person to hand the dossier to the FBI. Steele is the first one to do that himself (he met an FBI agent in Rome).

      As for McCain, Glenn Simpson testified that McCain got the dossier at a security conference in Halifax. Simpson claims that McCain just “happened” to be discussing rumors about the dossier with a British guy named Sir Andrew Wood when someone else came along (Simpson refused to name him) and told him where to get a copy. McCain then sent his aide (Kramer) to contact Steele directly, which Kramer did. Steele ended up meeting with Kramer at some point and handed him a copy, which ended up back on McCain’s desk. It was then that McCain contacted people in the FBI for an explanation. I think this story is probably mostly correct.

      But, here’s the kicker. Guess who else was on the guest list of that conference? A Russian named Akhmetshin. Who is he? Oh, you guessed it, he worked with FusionGPS and has close intelligence ties to the Kremlin. And if that isn’t enough, he is the same man that accompanied Veselnitskaya (lady lawyer) to Trump Tower in an attempt to entrap Don, Jr. This is also the same man (along with Veselnitskaya) that Simpson had dinner with on the 8th and the 10th (the day before and the day after the Trump tower encounter). Simpson admits all of this, but denies talking with them about the Trump meeting at the dinners (no one on earth believes this).

      Liked by 7 people

  17. Catinflorida says:

    Dan, if you’re reading this why did you say “Sarah’s spot on.”? She just gave Hillary an attempted get out of jail free card that I believe was fed to her by her deep state “sources”. I believe Ms Carter is niave and her judgement is clouded by her newfound celebrity on tv and her new job at the Hill.

    Liked by 12 people

  18. Liked by 22 people

  19. scott467 says:

    Trial Balloon – Sara Carter and Dan Bongino Discuss The Steele Dossier and The DOJ/FBI FISA Abuse…”

    ______________

    Judging by the comments section, it appears that ‘trail balloon’ was just hit by about 150 shotguns — simultaneously, LOL!

    And it cost Silly Sara Gowdy every last ounce of credibility she had.

    All gone!

    You go now!

    Liked by 12 people

  20. Who is Carter kidding? What happened to her and John Solomon’s “investigative” reporting. Maybe with Solomon now working for The Hill, some of the leftist b.s. rubbed off on Carter?

    Liked by 3 people

  21. ZurichMike says:

    And yet, we were led to believe she is the “world’s smartest woman” and was a genius Secretary of State. The shrieking harridan who lied repeatedly, the feminist who could only get ahead riding the coattails of her impeached, disbarred husband and sucking up to the even stupider Obama, the mentally unstable harpie who drowns her sorrows in vats of vodka that would make Maureen Dowd jealous, the physically decrepit bag lady who cannot manage stairs and who was filmed being thrown into a van like a piece of cheap luggage and again having brain freezes and seizures — yes, this Yale-educated bitch was a dupe of foreign powers.

    Even if that is true, and Hillary was a dupe of the Russians (despite her reset button and her vast resources as Secretary of State), why on earth would we want such a gullible, laughable idiot as President?

    Liked by 20 people

  22. A2 says:

    This interview segment is pretty effete. Carter’s wide-eyed suppositions based on ‘my sources tell me’ won’t fly anymore. Name names or keep quiet.

    The angle that ‘everybody’ was duped won’t fly either. Simpson’s interview is out there where he spends in inordinate amount of time vouching for his ‘boy scout’ MI6 buddy, Steele and his credibility and Russian credentials.

    I thought that line of reasoning risible.

    Liked by 10 people

  23. Lopeover says:

    Democrat-communists want to leave their pieces on the board by blaming the Russians again. So they can retrench and set up to make their play again in the future.

    The answer is no.

    Liked by 7 people

  24. wheatietoo says:

    Okay, so WaPo has been colluding with political operatives in the govt…to bring down a duly elected President.

    Isn’t this Treasonous Sedition?
    Sounds to me like it is.

    Jeff Bezos, owner of Amazon, also owns WaPo.
    Couldn’t he be brought up on charges of treasonous sedition?
    Freezing the assets of the richest man in the world would be an amazing thing.

    Liked by 11 people

  25. William F Buckley's Ghost says:

    Any excuse trumped up for the dossier gets blown apart by the illegal wiretaps and unmasking of Trump , his family and associates. They are getting buried by the layers of compounded crimes they committed to steal the election from President Trump.

    Liked by 10 people

  26. So Sara Carter and Jesse Waters become WILLING ACCOMPLICES in the COVER-UP.

    Liked by 4 people

  27. AngelOne says:

    Really Sara the Russians made them do it are you kidding me? She is worse than Rooster head at least his dog and pony show is one he’s running she however is being played and insulting the intelligence of the entire nation in the process.

    Her source must be someone inside the small investigatory circle Sundance instincts are spot on yet again.

    Liked by 4 people

  28. dontdrinklikeme says:

    I think this is going to totally work for them they are all going to get away with this defense.

    It will totally work until about Wednesday maybe even Thursday.

    Liked by 2 people

  29. Ari says:

    Before you get too crazy about Hannity and Carter (Limbaugh, Levin, Coulter, et al) remember that they only exist because of the ignorant republican electorate and their money. Trump will have to do a major re-education blitz when the Big Ugly comes to town.

    Liked by 10 people

  30. Texian says:

    First it was JIm Morrison of the Doors release of “An American Prayer” in the late 70’s.. “..Do you know we are ruled by TV..”.. hmm.. I mused..

    Then in the early ’80’s Stiv Bators ‘opened my eyes’ for good.. “The acting’s lousy but the blind don’t know..”

    Liked by 2 people

  31. woohoowee says:

    Boy Howdy! The Fake Newz Awards are gonna be a humdinger 🙂 Go President Trump45! GO!

    Liked by 3 people

  32. Bongino lays it out for everyone (including Sara) to see.
    Now, if Carter doesn’t look into and report on the FBI allowing private contractors access to the database, we know she’s playing a game.
    Brilliant.

    Liked by 8 people

  33. Deborah @UnTamedInSD says:

    Just retweeted by PDJT

    Liked by 9 people

  34. gamecock123 says:

    Mueller to just go away…Awe Hell to da Naw Naw Naw. Mueller should be criminally charged himself. He was in on it.

    Liked by 3 people

  35. Ruckus Tom says:

    So, when do people start getting arrested?

    Liked by 1 person

  36. Plain Jane says:

    Never could stand her. She overacts her every spoken part of her every written script.

    Liked by 1 person

  37. Bacall says:

    It’s the Gruber defense: you can lie to the Americans because they are all stupid.

    Liked by 1 person

  38. woohoowee says:

    No, no, this will never do – Holdup already drew the red line. These people are so transparent! LOL!

    Liked by 1 person

  39. freq says:

    Nothing better than a BIG STORM in the winter…

    Liked by 2 people

  40. StuckInBlue says:

    For those with cable, “FNL” is now your Sunday – Friday comedy sh!tshow.

    Like

  41. The Jimmy Jack says:

    I said before when Carter was suddenly “breaking” other – usually disparate stories – that Sara isn’t the earnest patriot she’s credited with being. Something with her just doesn’t sit right with me and never has.

    With the recent story and goofy Hannity’s praise for her I thought I might have been wrong (I do think he’s a good guy even if goofy). Thanks for clarifying. My gut instinct was right.

    Look back at her stories and how she kept getting breaking stories but I’m totally different topics. So rare it was a clue something was off. Maybe there’s more to the pattern. I’d think so.

    Liked by 2 people

  42. bill says:

    This could have worked on the surface ” Christopher Steele and Hillary Clinton was hoodwinked by a comprehensive Russian disinformation campaign; carried out by professional Russian intelligence agents; who duped the Clinton Campaign into THINKING Trump was a proxy political agent of Russia.”

    But for me it falls apart, when you realize that experienced FBI and CIA people were looking at this same material. If they believe the material was suspect then they voiced their concerns or deliberately allowed the corrupt material to form the foundation of the Dossier.

    Liked by 2 people

  43. MAGAbear says:

    Well, it would make sense that the Russians would want Hillary “Uranium One, Reset Button” Clinton to win the election, so why not send them fake info to use against a pro-American person like DJT? Not likely, but the biggest joke of muh Russia is that Russia wanted Trump to win and their friend from the State Department Shillary to lose. That’s the most ludicrous part of this whole sham.

    Liked by 2 people

    • bill says:

      O’yes the Russians wanted Hillary Clinton to win. The Uranium One was sweet deal for them and they wanted more! They must have realized that Hillary Clinton and her group friends were willing to sell, anything at the right price.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Esperanza says:

        See my post above. I don’t think they cared who won. Both outcomes were good for them in different ways. Did they meddle for the fun factor? I’ve seen no evidence. Rather they knew what was going on and had a good laugh about it.

        Like

    • Kaco says:

      He wanted Hillary to win because he knew she would sell off the rest of this country lock, stock. and barrel!

      Either way, I need to watch my own naivete. I fell for all of the pro-Putin as a populist before the election and that Russia could be a viable ally against globalism.

      As it has been, it’s just Pres. Trump and us against the world, just like he said!

      Liked by 1 person

  44. bill says:

    My little project – where are the logic failures in this story?

    **Did Obama read the documents and call on John Brennan (CIA Director)to start spying on Trumps Campaign, possibly to protect Hillary Clinton?

    Early last August, an envelope with extraordinary handling restrictions arrived at the White House. Sent by courier from the CIA, it carried “eyes only” instructions that its contents be shown to just four people: President Barack Obama and three senior aides.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2017/world/national-security/obama-putin-election-hacking/

    **Was this the point were spying on trump’s campaign through GCHQ started?

    “According to one account, GCHQ’s then head, Robert Hannigan, passed material in summer 2016 to the CIA chief, John Brennan. The matter was deemed so sensitive it was handled at “director level”. After an initially slow start, Brennan used GCHQ information and intelligence from other partners to launch a major inter-agency investigation.”

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/apr/13/british-spies-first-to-spot-trump-team-links-russia

    AIM has confirmed Judge Napolitano’s account from one of his three sources and found other confirmation of the likely procedure used, from a former NSA/CIA contractor. Judge Napolitano was suspended by Fox News for a week for revealing the GCHQ spying on Trump, but returned saying he and his sources stood by what he had reported.

    http://www.aim.org/special-report/watergate-style-wiretapping-confirmed/

    Thank You!

    Liked by 1 person

    • JAS says:

      I agree. Furthermore, that stuff went on for a long time in the Obama admin. – way before the Dossier came out. I still think the Dossier IS the insurance policy. That, so they could justify the unmasking and spying on Americans post facto.

      Liked by 1 person

  45. D. Manny says:

    Yep, just as I predicted in the prior thread….I knew it.

    Liked by 1 person

  46. freq says:

    Hey Swamp?… Time is just about up!… your stall and obfuscation just dug a deeper hole for you…
    congrats…

    Liked by 1 person

  47. Joe says:

    When I first read that John Solomon article in The Hill I thought it was a heads up leak to Page and Strzok, a warning to let them what they were likely to be asked about so they could prepare. If you want to drain the swamp that was not a good thing to leak.

    Liked by 1 person

  48. what she was saying wasn’t not making sense when I watched it live. She seemed very uneasy and unsure of what was coming out of her mouth. And knowing what I know thanks to SD and others, seemed like she was wrong… and kind of stupid.

    Liked by 1 person

  49. daveokc says:

    The U.S. Deep State coordinated with the BRITISH Deep State to destroy Donald Trump. (The politically correct Brits hate Trump because of his Brexit support, Islamic immigration comments, and, most importantly, Trump’s openness to dialogue with Putin).

    The Brits cooked up the Steele Dossier.

    The Brits bamboozled Sen. McCain to hand carry their dirty dossier to FBI headquarters.

    When Trump won the Brits knew they were f–ked. (British GCHQ Head Robert Harrigan abruptly resigned three days after Trump’s inauguration.)

    Now the Brits are desperate. I am afraid they will stop at NOTHING to divert attention away from the Steele Dossier Scandal. NOTHING.

    Whatever the world record is for fake news, the Brits are about to shatter it – all to divert American attention away. Fasten your seat belts, Jan-Mar 2018.

    Liked by 2 people

    • daveokc says:

      Stay Alert. The CTH comments section will become a prime target for Deep State narrative spinners: “Hillary and the Brits were unknowingly bamboozled by those evil Russians!!!”

      Don’t be stupid enough to fall for it.

      The Big Ugly Truth is that the British have their fingerprints all over the Steele Dossier Scandal.

      Liked by 2 people

      • V says:

        Clinton cabal admit to being duped by Russia?
        Obama/DOJ/FBI/Fusion GPS/Crowdstrike/IC/MSM cabal agree?
        Makes them all unfit for office, past, present and future.

        Breaking news:
        The Rosenbergs claim they were duped by Russia.
        Hitler and Mussolini claim they were duped by Russia.
        Manson and Polanski claim they were duped by Russia.
        Napoleon claims he was duped by Russia.
        Stalin claims he was duped by the Russians.
        Idi Amin claims he was duped by the Russians.
        Mao claims he was duped by the Russians.
        Karl Marx claims he was duped by the Russians.
        Freud claims he was duped by the Russians.
        The Cliveden set claim they were duped by Karl Marx.
        Herod claims he was duped by three Russians on camels.

        Liked by 1 person

    • RAC says:

      Great pity there is not more information about Harrigan, for instance if was an “offer your resignation or get fired” situation. Not that it would alter the situation much but I’m just nosey.

      Liked by 1 person

  50. deplorabledooku says:

    As was done with the slippery Al Capone who was never successfully convicted for his obvious crimes (such as murder, racketeering, bootlegging), so will happen with the eel-like Hitlery, not surprisingly from the same Chi-town. My belief is that it will not be the dossier, or the private server. but it will be the creative accounting that she did while heading the DNC, or her campaign, and the very incestuous connections between those entities and the Clinton charity slush fund. The emails and the Uranium One will yield criminal convictions, but IMO it will be the twisted money trail that will finally bring down the Clintons. I think Chelsea is in up to her eyeballs in this too, especially for accepting stolen funds. I also think that Bill was involved but almost as a product to sell, not as the money changer in the back room. He was kept busy with, let’s say, other vocations.

    Liked by 2 people

    • MVW says:

      Yes. It will be a legal attack using black and white laws. I hope they use a razor sharp prosecutor as capable as Mrs. Powell. Otherwise…

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s