No, The “Russian Dossier” Did Not Begin With GOP it Began With Clinton, The DNC and the FBI…

There is a tremendous amount of obfuscation coming from democrats after the revelation that Hillary Clinton and the DNC paid Fusion GPS to contract Christoper Steele to create the now infamous “Dossier”.  One of the most significant falsehoods is that the dossier origins began with an unknown GOP entity within the primary.  This narrative is entirely false.

The “Russian Dossier” did not begin assembly until after it was commissioned by Hillary Clinton and the DNC (June 2016).  Prior to that Fusion GPS was simply doing opposition research on behalf of a Trump opponent (stopped April 2016).

We likely know, with great confidence, exactly who that 2016 originating Trump opponent was. Thanks to: the timing, the originating entities, the associations and the player networks behind the 2015 GOP road map splitter strategy.  I’ll get to that aspect later.

First it’s important to frame a correct baseline.  Fusion GPS was doing commissioned opposition research.  AFTER April 2016, the Clinton Campaign and DNC then began financing Fusion GPS to create the “Russian Dossier”.  Christopher Steele began in June 2016 – The “Russian dossier” did not start assembly until commissioned by Clinton and the DNC.  This distinction is important.

(Via WaPo) … [Marc E.] Elias and his law firm, Perkins Coie, retained the firm [GPS Fusion] in April 2016 on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the DNC. Before that agreement, Fusion GPS’s research into Trump was funded by a still unknown Republican client during the GOP primary.

The Clinton campaign and the DNC, through the law firm, continued to fund Fusion GPS’s research through the end of October 2016, days before Election Day.

It should be noted that the New York Times had this story (the DNC/Clinton’s funding the dossier) a year prior and did not report on it because the DNC attorney, Marc E. Elias, outright denied it.

What began as ordinary commissioned opposition research into candidate Donald Trump back in 2015, stopped in April 2016.  This date is important because two key people, allies in the GOPe roadmap for Jeb Bush, took action at the exact same time the oppo-research was discontinued.

Candidate Jeb Bush dropped out of the race (Feb 20th,2016); and not long after Rupert Murdoch dropped out of his influence campaign after losing his alternate (Rubio – March).

Back in 2014/2015 we outlined the entire process the influence agents within the GOPe were using to elect Jeb Bush.  At first many thought we were nuts, however as time progressed through late 2015 and into the 2016 primaries the tripwire evidence was so overwhelming almost everyone had to admit what was going on.

Take a good look at this picture from the 2014 U.S. Chamber of Commerce Christmas Dinner celebration.

(left to right) Jeb Bush, Rupert Murdoch, Valerie Jarrett.

Christopher Steele was the retired British MI6 operative who authored the “Russian Dossier”.  Mr. Steele also formerly worked under Sir John Macleod Scarlett, a retired senior British Intelligence Officer in Moscow before Steele starting his own “consulting” business, Orbis in 2009.

Sir John Scarlett was behind the Tony Blair dossier claiming Saddam had deliverable weapons of mass destruction. He has experience trafficking fabricated charges and putting them in the hands of powerful people. However, more importantly, since 2011 Scarlett also sits on the board of Rupert Murdoch´s rebranded News UK, formerly News International.

This network is the likely connection between Rupert Murdoch wanting to aid the Jeb Bush candidacy and connect opposition research via familiar intelligence gathering operatives in the U.K.  It is highly likely, though not certain, the originating finances for the GOP “opposition research” on Trump, via Fusion GPS, came from Rupert Murdoch.

However, after the initial research was decommissioned, it was the Clinton Campaign and the DNC who became the financing entities, contacted Fusion GPS for continuance of the Fusion research and framed the resulting narrative (toward a Russian Conspiracy).

From the Washington Post: […] “Fusion GPS did not start off looking at Trump’s Russia ties, but quickly realized that those relationships were extensive, according to the people familiar with the matter.  When the Republican donor stopped paying for the research, Elias, acting on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the DNC, agreed to pay for the work to continue.”

It is important to note that Christopher Steele didn’t begin working on the “Russia Conspiracy Dossier” until June 2016, two months after it was dropped in April.

It was during the summer of 2016 when Christopher Steele framed the “Trump Russian Dossier” around sketchy and unsubstantiated intelligence reports he was personally creating from his research.  Steele previously worked in Russia for British intelligence. The dossier was simply a compilation of individual reports he prepared for Fusion. The dossier alleged that the Russian government collected compromising information about Trump and the Kremlin was engaged in an active effort to assist his campaign for president.

From the Chicago Tribune (FEB):

[…]  Steele, 53, began his Trump investigation in June 2016 after working for another client preparing a report on Russian efforts to interfere with politics in Europe.

U.S. intelligence had been independently tracking Russian efforts to influence electoral outcomes in Europe.

Steele was hired to work for a Washington research firm, Fusion GPS, that was providing information to a Democratic client. Fusion GPS began doing Trump research in early 2016, before it hired Steele, on behalf of a Republican opposed to the businessman’s candidacy. The firm declined to identify its clients.

[…] As summer turned to fall, Steele became concerned that the U.S. government was not taking the information he had uncovered seriously enough, according to two people familiar with the situation.

In October, anticipating that funding supplied through the original client would dry up, Steele and the FBI reached a verbal understanding: He would continue his work looking at the Kremlin’s ties to Trump and receive compensation for his efforts.

But Steele’s frustration deepened when FBI Director James Comey, who had been silent on the Russia inquiry, announced publicly 11 days before the election that the bureau was investigating a newly discovered cache of emails Clinton had exchanged using her private server, according to people familiar with Steele’s thinking.

Those people say Steele’s frustration with the FBI peaked after an Oct. 31 New York Times story that cited law enforcement sources drawing conclusions that he considered premature. The article said that the FBI had not yet found any “conclusive or direct link” between Trump and the Russian government and that the Russian hacking was not intended to help Trump. (link)

Byron York discusses the importance of the FBI angle:

(WASHINGTON) […] But knowing that the Clinton campaign, the DNC, and Perkins Coie supported the dossier is not the end of the story. The most important next step is the FBI.

Sometime in October 2016 — that is, at the height of the presidential campaign — Christopher Steele, the foreign agent hired by Fusion GPS to compile the Trump dossier, approached the FBI with information he had gleaned during the project. According to a February report in the Washington Post, Steele “reached an agreement with the FBI a few weeks before the election for the bureau to pay him to continue his work.”

It was an astonishing turn: the nation’s top federal law enforcement agency agreeing to fund an ongoing opposition research project being conducted by one of the candidates in the midst of a presidential election. “The idea that the FBI and associates of the Clinton campaign would pay Mr. Steele to investigate the Republican nominee for president in the run-up to the election raises further questions about the FBI’s independence from politics, as well as the Obama administration’s use of law enforcement and intelligence agencies for political ends,” wrote Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa.

In the end, according to reports, the FBI did not pay Steele. But the dossier did not go away. Indeed, in January 2017, Comey briefed President-elect Trump (and President Obama) on the dossier’s contents. (read more)

Representative Elise M. Stefanik is a young, freshman republican congresswoman from the Albany New York area. And using a probative questioning timeline, she single-handily pulled the mask from FBI Director James Comey, yet no-one seemed to notice.

Obviously Ms. Stefanik has not been in the swamp long enough to lose her common sense.

In the segment of the questioning below Rep. Stefanik begins by asking director Comey what are the typical protocols, broad standards and procedures for notifying the Director of National Intelligence, the White House and senior congressional leadership (aka the intelligence Gang of Eight), when the FBI has opened a counter-intelligence investigation.

The parseltongue response from Comey is a generalized reply (with uncomfortable body language) that notification of counter-intel investigations are discussed with the White House, and other pertinent officials, on a calendar basis, ie. “quarterly”.

With the statement that such counter-intel notifications happen “generally quarterly”, and against the backdrop that Comey stated in July of 2016 a counter-intel investigation began, Stefanik asks:

…”when did you notify the White House, the DNI and congressional leadership”?

BOOM! Watch an extremely uncomfortable Director James Comey outright LIE… by claiming there was no active DNI -which is entirely false- James Clapper was Obama’s DNI.


Watch it again.

Watch that first 3:00 minutes again. Ending with:

…”Because of the sensitivity of the matter” ~ James Comey

Director Comey intentionally obfuscates knowledge of the question from Rep Stefanik; using parseltongue verbiage to get himself away from the sunlit timeline.

The counter-intel investigation, by his own admission, began in July 2016. Congress was not notified until March 2017. That’s an eight month period – Obviously obfuscating the quarterly claim moments earlier.

The uncomfortable aspect to this line of inquiry is Comey’s transparent knowledge of the politicized Office of the DNI James Clapper by President Obama. Clapper was used rather extensively by the Obama Administration as an intelligence shield, a firewall or useful idiot, on several occasions.

Anyone who followed the Obama White House intel policy outcomes will have a lengthy frame of reference for DNI Clapper and CIA Director John Brennan as the two primary political operatives. Brennan admitted investigating, and spying on, the Senate Intelligence Committee as they held oversight responsibility for the CIA itself.

The first and second questions from Stefanik were clear. Comey’s understanding of the questions was clear. However, Comey directly evaded truthful response to the second question. When you watch the video, you can see Comey quickly connecting the dots on where this inquiry was going.

There is only one reasonable explanation for FBI Director James Comey to be launching a counter-intel investigation in July 2016, notifying the White House and Clapper, and keeping it under wraps from congress. Comey was a participant in the intelligence gathering for political purposes – wittingly, or unwittingly.

As a direct consequence of this mid-thought-stream Comey obfuscation, it is now clear -at least to me- that Director Comey was using his office as a facilitating conduit for the political purposes of the Obama White House.

This entry was posted in Agitprop, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Election 2016, FBI, media bias, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Russia, Tripwires, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

540 Responses to No, The “Russian Dossier” Did Not Begin With GOP it Began With Clinton, The DNC and the FBI…

  1. webgirlpdx says:

    Dear Amazing SD and Treepers:

    The genie is out of the bottle. Finally. We have two major scandals now that are out in the open and can’t be stopped.

    The MSM is so shallow and so without any credibility the only thing they have to talk about today is ‘opposition research’. We know that’s going to be a major fail. We’ll have to wait to see if there are any honest journalists left.

    In saying that, I’d like to thank Sundance and all the rest of you Treepers — much smarter than I — for keeping this drum beat all these months. I have no doubt that this website is being read by many in the Swamp and many foes. You are all the BEST and I don’t think I could have made it through all these months without you. And My President who has never given me one millisecond of doubt that he is truly on my side and America’s side.

    I think kudos to Sean and Lou too because as many days it might have been repetitive, they also kept the drumbeat up… is now coming to fruition.

    And mostly, thank you God, for your ever hand in this…..we know we can always count on you.


    Liked by 20 people

  2. kpm58 says:

    Would it be possible for President Trump to have already gotten FISA warrants for wiretaps on the parties involved in the Uranium matter?

    Liked by 3 people

  3. When is Sessions going to step up, and do something! I want to see the Clinton’s assets traced, and confiscated. I then want to see them jailed!

    Liked by 3 people

    • webgirlpdx says:

      Don’t know if Hillary will ever see a day in jail, but what I want more than anything after that is seeing Clinton Foundation assets seized. And little Chelsea’s 10 million dollar apartment confiscated.

      Oh how I’d love to be a forensic accountant involved in digging into it!

      Liked by 5 people

    • backwoodsgirl123 says:

      I wrote to Jeff Sessions and asked him to resign if he wouldn’t or couldn’t do his job!

      Liked by 2 people

    • Thinkinman says:

      It’s highly unlikely that Sessions will ever “step up” given the way this particular exchange went down…


    • sat0422 says:

      He’s doing very important work fighting MS-13 and I sincerely mean that. But, while many of us “deplorables” are wondering where he is on this DNC/Clinton mess, and it is a worthy questions and one that might ultimatelly cost him his job.
      Trump has shown us that he knows what is going on around him and either he is letting Jeff hang himself or he supports him. No one else has been given a “free pass” to do what the want and I’m sure Jeff is feeling some heat or he is a great actor.
      It just made me cringe last week to see him so happy shaking hands with members of congress – it was like a family reunion that had met for the first time in 20 years.
      Who would have ever thought that Jeff Sessions would be a big ?. Does he know about this mess than he wants the public to know. Sooner or later, we will know how Jeff stands.


  4. I hope THIS Forthcoming Witness has 24/7 protection..

    Liked by 5 people

    • backwoodsgirl123 says:

      Need to add Shawn Lucas to the list.

      “The process server for the DNC Fraud Lawsuit, Shawn Lucas, also mysteriously died of an alleged overdose only a couple weeks after serving notice at DNC headquarters.”

      View story at

      If you go to this site, be sure you read the WARNING before watching any of the videos.

      ****This embedded content is from a site that does not comply with the Do Not Track (DNT) setting now enabled on your browser.*****


      • backwoodsgirl123 says:

        I don’t know why there is an image instead of the link above!

        That is the first image on the page with the title of the article in a link imposed above it.

        The site is: the article name is: Did Russia Interfere In The US Election?


    • Bud says:

      I imagine that secret source is quite afraid of his life right now.


  5. Thurstan says:

    IMO the typical statement for being found out as Crooked would be, “we’ll all go to jail.” Or a variation thereof. “We’ll all hang from nooses,” implies Hillary is referring to their acts as treason.

    Liked by 4 people

    • webgirlpdx says:

      I’m sure there are plenty that can flip to save themselves. After all, she’ll never be president and truth be known, I’ll bet they never liked her anyway?

      Liked by 3 people

      • Madi says:

        Who will take the deal of « immunity »? Who has everything to loose?
        When you are involved in a « global swamp «  who will come out?
        The Obamanista, Brennan, Bill Clinton, The Bushes, Comey, Miller, Previous AG Loretta Lynch and those before her? Politicians? Scotus?
        Only the past can predicted the futur: law breakers will break the law again. Leakers will leak again. Those who have stand in the past are dead.
        May God help us.
        To all of you who tell the truth to inform us : (can name all of you)
        Conservative tree: Thank you : thank you
        Drudge :thank you
        Vlad Tepes: thank you
        The gateway pundit, Daily caller, Breitbart : thank yo thank you
        The savage nation thank you
        Orlytaitz esq : thank you


  6. freddy says:

    The main problem is our own side will hide and protect so as not to be pointed at themselves. Another slam dunk case of corruption yet Sessions is dragging his pathetic a## and those RINO Senators who have known for months none of this was ever true are still there. Gowdy is not trust worthy and trumps DOJ and FBI are like North korea or maybe Mexico in a state of full corruption and cover up….We are in the most scary times ever with the far left on the march against our culture and the imbeds in the intel organizations carrying out a coup with GOP help………………


  7. True Colors says:

    I do not have any problem whatsoever with a politician paying an outside agency to dig up dirt on an political opponent. Whether it is Hillary doing it, or the DNC, or Jeb!, or whoever, that’s fine. That’s politics.

    However….. the fact that the FBI was actively trying to help one side undermine the other side….. wow, scary stuff. Much, much, much worse than Watergate.

    People want to talk about Russia supposedly interfering in our election. How about the FBI interfering in our election?


    “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”

    ― Marcus Tullius Cicero

    Liked by 9 people

    • webgirlpdx says:

      Op research happens everyday. Paying a foreign agent for it isn’t. Yes, Comey’s FBI people should be the first in Hillary’s noose.

      Liked by 3 people

      • keebler AC ovfefe says:

        Agree! And a foreign agent is tantamount to treason and conspiring with a country’s enemies. Point 1 – Globalism is the equivalent of treason too and the characters who expedited the process for Hillary were dual citizens of other countries such as Murdoch if he financed the initiative.

        Point 2 – It’s apparent that the Russia collusion had zero to do with Trump and everything to do easy confabulation within Steele’s pre-existing Russia network. If Steele’s network was based in India, there’d be a fake dossier formed around India and not Russia. The Muh Russian meme points back at Steele and Hillary’s criminality.

        Liked by 2 people

    • Kristin says:

      Using the FISA courts….

      Liked by 3 people

  8. pmdea says:

    Book “Clinton Cash” outselling “What Happened – I’m a Crook” ten to one. LOL

    Liked by 5 people

  9. StormyeyesC says:

    Good point: Remember when Jess Sessions brought back civil asset forfeiture? Make sense now? He mentioned “organized crime and cartels”.

    Liked by 3 people

  10. Minnie says:

    Alrighty, then:

    October 25, 2017
    OAN Newsroom

    A new report says Paul Manafort and the Podesta group mediated the uranium deal between Russia and the Obama administration.

    Liked by 1 person

    • backwoodsgirl123 says:

      But Russia DOES have interest in United States real estate!

      All of those CITGO Refineries, pipelines and 48 US petroleum product terminals!

      Starting at about 2:20 in the video…..

      Mnuchin GRILLED Senate Banking Committee Hearing on Donald Trump Tax Reform 5/18/17 TAX News

      I wrote a letter in March to you, concerning about the real possibility that the administration would be forced to deal with an offer from Russia’s state owned oil company.To aquire critical energy infrastucture in the United States.

      Last year (2016), Venezuela’s large state owned oil company pledged nearly 50% of Citgo (the U.S. subsidiary of the Venezuelan oil company Petróleos de Venezuela known as PDVSA) shares to Rosneft (leader in Russia’s petroleum industry) as collateral for it’s loan.

      So my question is, “Would it concern you Mr. Secretary, if Venezuela’s state owned oil company defaults on the debt and as a result, Russia’s state owned oil company, exercised a near majority ownership stake, if they haven’t purchased additional shares in the open market…they may have, the possibility of being a majority owner. With 48 US petroleum product terminals, three refineries in three different states, nine pipelines throughout the country…Wouldn’t that be something that concerned you?”

      Mnuchin responds…that they needed to have the discussion confidentially because it delt with National Security.


  11. jkcinsalem says:

    The timeline may be a coincidence, but I think Mr. Murdoch ‘s tweet was about his marriage & honeymoon with his new bride, Ms. Hall.


  12. jeans2nd says:

    Seems fitting that $6 mil was paid for a “dossier” that, aside from the obvious fake salacious details and items already proven wrong, is drawn from info readily available from media publications.

    Obama team was warned in 2014 about Russian interference
    “Concerns about Russian cyberespionage and election meddling largely grew out of the events following Russia’s annexation of Crimea in March 2014, followed by an aggressive Russian effort to influence the Ukrainian presidential election that May…A Russia-backed cyberattack against Ukraine’s voting infrastructure…could have changed voter tallies”

    ““They (Obama & team) were warned…They just didn’t know how to deal with the bad guys.””

    16 Jan 2016
    “American intelligence agencies are to conduct a major investigation into how the Kremlin is infiltrating political parties in Europe, it can be revealed.”

    “James Clapper, the US Director of National Intelligence, has been instructed by the US Congress to conduct a major review into Russian clandestine funding of European parties over the last decade.”

    Yup. Clapper was ordered by the U.S. Congress to look into Russian “interference” into European election “meddling” by Russia Jan 2016. Talk about useless id10ts.

    Most of the first page and part of the second page of the “dossier” was all publicly known.

    One question. Clinton/DNC stopped paying Steele/Fusion GPS Oct 2016. Pages 34 – 35 of the “dossier” is dated 13 Dec 2016 and further explicates “details” that point to Trump-Russia “collusion” to explain why Clinton lost the election. Who paid for that last entry dated 13 Dec 2016? Recall McCain either sent or accompanied one of McCain’s aides to London Nov 2016 to read and obtain a copy of the “dossier.”

    Oppo research was a-ok for the GOPe to be doing on then-Candidate Trump, but when Don Jr had that mtg in Trump Tower w/a Russian atty it was impeachable treason. Funny how that works.

    And this all started, according to the Wikileaks emails, in June 2015 when a focus group indicated that the Uranium One story would hurt Clinton, and the Dec 2015 Podesta email directing all to concentrate on the (imagined imo) Trump-Putin “bromance.” One might plausibly go back to Snowden and Snowden’s treason w/Russia and still be correct.

    One could write a book with all the other obvious links to Clinton-Obama. Would make someone rich and famous, no doubt.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. B Woodward says:

    13 criminal laws violated – sounds like an unlucky number.

    Good news tonight. Attorney Gregg Jarrett was on Hannity tonight. He indicated that Hillary can be charged with 13 crimes. She could be charged with 6 anti-corruption statutes (all felonies), racketeering for using her charity as a criminal enterprise, and 4 crimes for her emails (including 2 under the espionage act). She also violated the law to pay a foreign national for a political campaign, and Hillary and the DNC hid that activity in their financial reports–another crime. Later in the interview he stated that Comey could be in big trouble.

    In other news, Gregg Jarrett stated that Mueller is in violation of the conflict of interest statute, and he should be disbarred, prosecuted, and jailed. The law governing the special counsel (28 CFR 600.7) specifically prohibits him from serving if he has a conflict of interest in the case. The rule has been interpreted to mean that even the appearance of a conflict is sufficient for disqualification.

    Liked by 2 people

    • backwoodsgirl123 says:

      I don’t believe in luck!

      And I’ll believe that Hillary will be prosecuted when I see it! Until then, I’ll keep praying!

      There’s always an investigation and it doesn’t seem to go anywhere because there are too many criminals in DC who have dirt on them!


  14. LM says:

    The term “opposition research” in rhe case of the Russian Dossier implies that the Clintons were concerned with finding true but incriminating facts about a political opponent. It normalizes the obscene, vile, baseness of what was really done to our President by the Clintons.

    They paid foreign intelligence operatives to create a completely false narrative (propaganda) to not only neutralize President Trump politically but destroy his reputation as a person of honor and integrity. They targeted not just his career for destruction, but the man himself and….coincidentally, his family.

    Creating lies to slime and destroy a man is not the same thing as bringing forth true, but uncomfortable facts about a person to inform the electorate of his character.

    Bringing out all the truth about a candidate is one thing. Lying about a candidate, colluding with a foreign government to do so and using that to weaponize American intelligence agencies to lie about him and spy on him to influence our election or overthrow his presidency is another.

    This kind of thing cannot be allowed to be swept under the rug.

    Looking the other way and covering up wrong doing such as this dirties both the individual who does so, and the society in which he abides.

    Compassion should be reserved for the victims of these self-serving evil entities…..victims, not limited to our president, who have been and who will be to come if we do not “lock them up”.

    Liked by 2 people

  15. Kent says:

    SD…you are amazing…………you simply speak the truth…….


  16. Kent says:

    an interesting aside…Russians got talent…
    “Wicked game – Voice(Russia) Anton Belyaev”
    youtube it..
    Chris Isaac cover on the piano….by a Russian performer


  17. Kent says:

    bathsalts wicked thing to do…
    “Nicolas Cage sings Wicked game | Voice | Blind audition”….

    (actually pretty dang good)….

    I feel so sorry for libs……

    Hope he gets things straightened out.


  18. Another Scott says:

    So when is someone going to show Robert Mueller the door? His investigation is the biggest sham ever…..


    • sat0422 says:

      If Mueller is getting a salary, it needs to be frozen immediately. That will stop the investigationunless someone takes up the “pay” issue under the table.


  19. recoverydotgod says:

    I wonder what Harry Reid has to say about the new developments in the dossier story. Was he vaguely referring to the dossier to Comey as the Buzzfeed editor in chief wondered back in January?


  20. Lindy says:

    Remember when Rick Wilson was begging people to release something during the campaign? He talked as if it was common knowledge. Sounds like this Fake dossier that was shopped around to media outlets.


  21. recoverydotgod says:

    Pretty sweet deal to have “allegations that Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information” about Mr. Trump, in the synopsis reportedly be in part from the Trump dossier. Which intelligence chiefs knew who had paid for the dossier? I wonder how much of the synopsis was from the Trump dossier? Most of it? Did the rest of the allegations come from the work done for the Republican donor who Fusion GPS was working for prior on oppo research on Trump? This really really looks like a built narrative now that it’s out in the open who actually paid for the oppo research, at least on the Democratic side.

    Intel chiefs presented Trump with claims of Russian efforts to compromise him
    By Evan Perez, Jim Sciutto, Jake Tapper and Carl Bernstein, CNN
    Updated 5:26 PM ET, Thu January 12, 2017

    These senior intelligence officials also included the synopsis to demonstrate that Russia had compiled information potentially harmful to both political parties, but only released information damaging to Hillary Clinton and Democrats. This synopsis was not an official part of the report from the intelligence community case about Russian hacks, but some officials said it augmented the evidence that Moscow intended to harm Clinton’s candidacy and help Trump’s, several officials with knowledge of the briefings tell CNN.


  22. Saveedra says:

    May God keep the informant safe so he may testify successfully & also, may the truth be revealed and justice occur. ❤️🙏❤️


  23. jeans2nd says:

    In the Wikileaks emails is a doc from the Clinton campaign team titled “150407_Strategy_on_GOP_2016ers.pdf.”
    This doc was sent to the DNC and is dated 15 Apr 2015.

    From the .pdf –
    “The goal, then, is to have a dossier on the GOP candidates on the likely attacks HRC will face.”

    “any information on scandals or ethical lapses on the GOP candidates would serve well. We won’t be picky.”

    This “dossier” work was underway in early April 2015 by the Clinton campaign and the DNC. The word “dossier” is even used. The GOPe may have had oppo research, but did it really have any part in the Clinton/DNC work? Was there really collusion between the DNC and the GOPe this early on? At this early point in the capaign, the GOPe still believed Rubio at the very least had a good chance of winning were Jeb Bush not to succeed. (directions for the media to follow are even included in this .pdf)

    It would seem the “reporting” that the original info for the “dossier” came from a Republican may in fact truly be false (we call this a lie in my fam). Fake News. Fusion GPS may not have been hired until Jun 2016, but odds are Fusion GPS’s original info came from the Clinton campaign and the DNC.

    Further, notice the date of this .pdf – 7 Apr 2015. Donald J. Trump did not announce his candidacy until the day after Jeb Bush announced, which would be 15 and 16 Jun 2015 respectively, iirc.
    How/why were these two candidates (or more?) so definitvely included in this .pdf?


    • jeans2nd says:

      How do we know the GOPe was doing research on Donald J. Trump? Would it not make more sense that the GOPe had hired Fusion GPS to do oppo research on Clinton as well on Donald J. Trump?

      From the .pdf referenced –
      “As we all know, the right wing attack machine has been building its opposition research on Hillary Clinton for decades. The RNC et al has been telegraphing they are ready to attack and do so with reckless abandon”

      The Clinton and the DNC hired the firm that had been doing oppo research on Clinton so as to find out what Fusion GPS had already given the GOPe on Clinton. At the least this would give plausible deniabilty of any collusion between the DNC and the GOPe. By Apr 2016 it was apparent Donald J. Trump was going to win the nomination, and the GOPe had no desire at all to help Donald J. Trump with any oppo research on Clinton, imo.


      • Ziiggii says:

        How do we know the GOPe was doing research on Donald J. Trump? Would it not make more sense that the GOPe had hired Fusion GPS to do oppo research on Clinton as well on Donald J. Trump?

        you are forgetting a very basic principle:
        They could care less about doing “oppo” research on Hildabeast. Hell they’ve got reams of it already – the Clinton’s have been on top of the mountain for decades already. No need for more oppo research.

        By Apr 2016 it was apparent Donald J. Trump was going to win the nomination, and the GOPe had no desire at all to help Donald J. Trump with any oppo research on Clinton, imo.

        which is why they dropped the research in March of 2016… the Clinton’s found out about the work already started in June 2016 and by July 2016 had come up with a brilliant plan to just hire an ex-MI6 agent with ties to “muh Russia!” to just make poo stick to the wall.


  24. Missing Andrew says:

    Steyn Expose Fake Russia Collusion

    “Everyone’s colluding with Russia… EXCEPT TRUMP.”

    you’ve got Christopher Steele who who you credit as an ex mi6 agent he’s not they just any old ex MI6 agent he’s the head of the Russia desk at MI6 which is a pretty big deal


  25. sundance, what do you think about this recent Trump nomination to the FTC,

    “President Trump will nominate a Washington-based antitrust attorney as the chairman of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).”

    Just coincidence this antitrust lawyer being nominated to the FTC and suddenly Bezo’s personal blog WaPo dropping the bomb about DNC/Hillary funding the dossier? “No Donald, we’ll be good! Don’t break us up! Here, here’s a story we’ve been sitting on! See? We’ll be good!”


  26. Ziiggii says:

    “With respect to the dossier itself, the key thing is it doesn’t matter who paid for it,” Clapper told Erin Burnett on “OutFront” Wednesday night. “It’s what the dossier said and the extent to which it’s corroborated or not.”


  27. John says:

    Why is Fusion GPS so concerned about the secrecy of their banking records if, “…it doesn’t matter who paid for it.”?

    Did money flow TO the Clinton ‘foundation’ or the DNC FROM Fusion GPS? Did that money come from Hillary campaign – self dealing; DNC – more self dealing; From FBI? – is that embezzlement? From Russia? Did the suspicious info come with a wad of cash paper-clipped to it? – what kind of illegal contribution is that?

    If you think what we’ve seen so far is bad. Just wait – another shoe is about to drop. How dumb is it that the democrats and anti-Trumpers (is there any difference?) have been yelling about Russian collusion for a year, now. Look at Russia! – Look at Russia! And everyone involved has been colluding and self-dealing EXCEPT DJT?

    I don’t know how much more winning I can take. I’m going to run out of popcorn.

    Liked by 1 person

  28. Pingback: Trump Busts Hillary & Jeb Bush In ‘Secret Plot’ To Overthrow Him, This Will Blow Your Mind | Newsportal

  29. Ziiggii says:

    CNN spread misinformation to its viewers Friday when a chyron on Wolf Blitzer’s show claimed that an anti-Trump Republican helped fund the Russian dossier.

    Host Wolf Blitzer said that a Republican “first established contact” with Fusion GPS, which is correct based on current reports, but the chyron floating below him during the interview claimed that Republican was also behind funding for the dossier.

    “Who’s the anti-Trump Republican who helped fund the dossier?” the chyron misleadingly asks.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s