U.S. State Department Begins Effort To Undermine French Election and Utilize “The Vast Russian Conspiracy”…

Those who follow the messaging from within the unofficial news agency of the U.S. State Department, CNN or CNNi, might have noticed a report delivered by Wolf Blitzer yesterday claiming the Russians were set to influence another nationalist election victory, this time in France.


With a vote coming in April, could French elections be targeted by the same Russian hackers accused of meddling in the US campaign?  (CNN LINK)

The entire proclamation by Blitzer, and the executive level CNN folks who put it together, was almost identical to the previous claims of a vast Russian conspiracy influencing the U.S. election and the victory of President Donald Trump.   The difference between November 2016 and today, is this time CNN is attempting to get out ahead of an election rather than responding to the outcome therein.

In essence, CNN -and by extension the progressive State Department officials remaining within the shadow deep state construct- is trying to influence the French Presidential Race.  Blaming the Russians in advance is an attempt to weaken Marine Le Pen.

But why would they do this, you might ask.  Well, those of you who have followed the historic research on the State Department might well remember the “Rivkin Project“.  The globalist agents who carry a vested interest are simply not willing to concede another loss in their decades long approach toward eliminating nationalist sentiment.


The U.K. Brexit outcome and the success of President Donald Trump are two losses for the globalist sycophants; a loss in France would be the proverbial dam break.

Does all of this seem too conspiratorial to fathom on an international level?  If so, perhaps understanding the 2010 Rivkin project would provide context for the scope of these globalist interests.

The Rivkin Project: Globalism Using Multiculturalism to Subvert Sovereign Nations.

During Secretary Hillary Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State an event took place that garnered little media attention.  It was October 19-22, 2010, as the Obama administration’s “Arab Spring” was rising amid the headlines, when Charles Rivkin, US Ambassador to France, invited a 29-member delegation from the Pacific Council on International Policy (PCIP) to a conference in France, the stated purpose of which was to discuss Arab and Islamic relations in the country.

The meeting was part of a far-reaching subversive agenda to transform that entire character of France and in particular the consciousness of French youth, which includes the use of France’s Muslim youth in a typically manipulative globalist strategy behind the usual façade of “human rights” and “equality.”

Globalist Delegation at US Embassy – The PCIP report states of the conference:

…The delegation further focused on three key themes. First, the group examined Franco-Muslim issues in France through exchanges with Dr. Bassma Kodmani, Director of the Arab Reform Institute, and Ms. Rachida Dati, the first female French cabinet member of North African origin and current Mayor of the 7th Arrondissement in Paris.

A trip to the Grand Mosque of Paris and a meeting with the Director of Theology and the Rector there provided additional insight. Second, meetings with Mr. Jean-Noel Poirier, the Vice President of External Affairs at AREVA (a highly innovative French energy company), and with Mr. Brice Lalonde, climate negotiator and former Minister of the Environment, highlighted energy and nuclear policy issues and the differences between U.S. and French policies in these arenas.

And finally, the delegation explored the connections between media and culture in California (Hollywood) and France in meetings at the Louvre, the Musee D’Orsay, and at FRANCE 24 – the Paris-based international news and current affairs channel.

sarkozy-clintonThe over-riding concern focused on on matters of a multicultural dimension, including not only Arab and Islamic relations in France, but perhaps more importantly in the long term, a discussion on the impact of Hollywood “culture” on the French.

The USA has long played a duplicitous game of “fighting terrorism” of an “Islamic” nature as one of the primary elements of its post-Cold War stratagem of manufactured permanent crises, while using “radical Islam” for it own purposes, the well-known examples being:

  • (1) supporting Bin Laden in the war against Russia in Afghanistan;
  • (2) backing Saddam Hussein in the war against Iran;
  • (3) supporting the Kosovo Liberation Army in ousting the Serbs from mineral-rich Kosovo, the KLA having been miraculously transformed from being listed by the US State Department as a “terrorist organization,” to becoming “freedom fighters.”

When US globalists pose as friends of Muslims, the latter should sup with the Great Shaitan with an exceedingly long spoon.

What is the Pacific Council on International Policy? The PCIP, of which Rivkin is a member, was founded in 1995 as a regional appendage of the omnipresent globalist think tank, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), It is headquartered in Los Angeles, but “with members and activities throughout the West Coast of the United States and internationally.” Corporate funding comes from, among others:

  • Carnegie Corporation of New York
  • Chicago Council on Foreign Relations
  • City National Bank
  • The Ford Foundation
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation
  • Rockefeller Brothers Fund
  • The Rockefeller Foundation
  • United States Institute of Peace

The PCIP is therefore yet another big player in the globalist network comprising hundreds of interconnected organizations, lobbies, “civil society” groups, NGOs, and think tanks, associated the US Government, and with banks and other corporations. As usual, there is a conspicuous presence by Rockefeller interests, and the interesting character, Nicky Rockefeller, is a member, despite the insistence of some “skeptics” that he doesn’t actually exist.

Why France? France has long been a thorn in the side of US globalism because of its stubborn adherence to French interests around the world, rather than those of the manufactured “world community.” Despite Sarkozy, France is one of the few states left in Western Europe with the remnant of a national consciousness.

The best way of destroying any such sentiment is to weaken the concepts of nationhood and nationality by means of promoting “multiculturalism.”

Was it only a coincidence that the 1968 student revolt, sparked by the most puerile of reasons, occurred at a time both when the CIA was very active in funding student groups around the world, and when President De Gaulle was giving the USA a lot of trouble? De Gaulle did little to play along with American’s post-war plans. He withdrew France from NATO military command.

Even during World War II as leader of the Free French, he was distrusted by the USA. Of particular concern would have been De Gaulle’s advocacy of a united Europe to counteract US hegemony. In 1959 he stated at Strasbourg: “Yes, it is Europe, from the Atlantic to the Urals, it is the whole of Europe, that will decide the destiny of the world.” The expression implied détente between a future neutralist Europe and the USSR. In 1967 he declared an arms embargo on Israel and cultivated the Arab world.

This is the type of statesmanship that globalists fear. With the buffoonery of Sarkozy, and mounting tension with disaffected Muslim youth, a backlash could see an intransigently anti-globalist, “xenophobic” regime come to power.

In today’s context, what better way now to subvert French nationalism and head-off any potential to revive as an anti-globalist force, than to use France’s large, unassimilated Islamic component, just as the Bolshevik revolution was undertaken to a significant extent by the disaffected minorities of the Russian Empire?

Of interest also is the interest of the PCIP delegation in the influence of Hollywood on French culture. This might seem at first glance to be an odd concern. However Hollywood, as the symbol of international cultural excrescence, is an important factor in globalization, in what amounts to a world culture-war.

Ultimately the goal of globalism is not to promote the survival of ethnic cultures and identities, but rather to submerge them into one big melting pot of global consumerism, to uproot every individual from an identity and heritage and replace that with the global shopping mall, and the “global village.” Therefore multiculturalism should be viewed as the antithesis of what it is understood as being.

So far from the global corporates wanting to promote so-called multiculturalism in terms of assuring the existence of a multiplicity of cultures, as the term implies; it is to the contrary part of a dialectical process whereby under the facade of humane ideals, peoples of vastly different heritage are moved across the world like pawns on a chess board. It is an example of Orwellian “doublethink.” It is notable that the instigators of the “velvet revolutions” now sweeping North Africa and reaching into Iran are largely “secularized” youths without strong traditional roots.

Similarly, the best way to solve France’s ethnic conflicts and to assure that France does not re-emerge again to confront US/globalist interests, is to dialectically create a new cultural synthesis where there is neither a French culture nor an Islamic culture, but under the banner of “human rights” and “equality,” a globalist youth-based culture nurtured by Hollywood, MTV, cyberspace, MacDonald’s and Pepsi.

That this is more than hypothesis is indicated in the manner by which the secular youth revolts now taking place in North Africa have been spawned by an alliance of corporate interests, sponsored by the US State Department and sundry NGOs such as Freedom House. The North African “revolutionaries” are just the type of “Muslim” that the globalists prefer; spawned and nurtured with the cyber-consumer mentality.

So what are Rivkin and the US State Department up to in France, that they should be so interested in the place of Hollywood and of Muslims in the country?


The Rivkin Project for Subverting French Youth – That year (2010), when Rivkin had invited a delegation of fellow PCIP members to France, he had outlined a program for the Americanization of France that primarily involved the use of the Muslim minorities and the indoctrination of French youth with corporate globalist ideals.

The slogan invoked was the common commitment France and America historically had to “equality.” Wikileaks released the “confidential” Rivkin program. It is entitled “Minority Engagement Strategy.”

Here, Rivkin outlines a program that is a far-reaching interference in the domestic affairs of a sovereign nation and, more profoundly, seeks to change the attitudes of generations of Muslim and French youth so that they might be merged into a new globalist synthesis; or what might be called a new humanity: Homo economicus, or what the financial analyst G Pascal Zachary calls “The Global Me,” to achieve what Rivkin describes as USA’s “national interests.”

Rivkin begins by stating that his Embassy has created a “Minority Engagement Strategy,” that is directed at Muslims in France. Rivikin states as part of the program: “…We will also integrate the efforts of various Embassy sections, target influential leaders among our primary audiences, and evaluate both tangible and intangible indicators of the success of our strategy.”

Rivkin is confident that France’s history of ideological liberalism “will serve us well as we implement the strategy outlined here… in which we press France….” Note the phrase: “press France”. America’s global agenda is linked by Rivkin to his blueprint for transferring France into “a thriving, inclusive French polity [that] will help advance our interests in expanding democracy and increasing stability worldwide.” The program will focus on the “elites” of the French and the Muslim communities, but will also involve a massive propaganda campaign directed at the “general population,” with a focus on the young.

The program also includes redefining French history in the school curricula to give attention to the role of non-French minorities in French history. It means that the Pepsi/MTV generation of Americans and their mentors in academe will be formulating new definitions of French culture and writing new pages of French history to accord with globalist agendas. Towards this end: “…we will continue and intensify our work with French museums and educators to reform the history curriculum taught in French schools.

“Tactic Number Three” is entitled: “Launch Aggressive Youth Outreach.” As in other states targeted by the US State Department and their allies at the Soros network, Freedom House, Movement.org, National Endowment for Democracy, Solidarity Center, and so forth; disaffected youth are the focus for change.

Leading the charge on this effort, the Ambassador’s inter-agency Youth Outreach Initiative aims to “engender a positive dynamic among French youth that leads to greater support for U.S. objectives and values.” Can the intentions be stated any plainer? It is Americanization culturally and politically.

It is here that we can most easily get past the cant and see what is behind the strategy: to form a generation “that leads to greater support for U.S. objectives and values”.

These “U.S. objectives and values” will be sold to the French as “French values” on the basis of the bourgeoisie ideals of 1789 which continue to encumber French ideology on both Left and Right.

The young French will be taught to think that they are upholding French traditions, rather than acting as the useful idiots of Americanization, and concomitant banality of the global shopping mall. A far-reaching program incorporating a variety of indoctrination methods is outlined:

To achieve these aims, we will build on the expansive Public Diplomacy programs already in place at post, and develop creative, additional means to influence the youth of France, employing new media, corporate partnerships, nationwide competitions, targeted outreach events, especially invited U.S. guests.

The program directed at youth in France is similar to that directed at the youth that formed the vanguard of the “velvet revolutions” from Eastern Europe to North Africa. Potential leaders are going to be taken up by the US State Department in France and cultivated to play a part in the future France of American design:

We will also develop new tools to identify, learn from, and influence future French leaders.

As we expand training and exchange opportunities for the youth of France, we will continue to make absolutely certain that the exchanges we support are inclusive.

We will build on existing youth networks in France, and create new ones in cyberspace, connecting France’s future leaders to each other in a forum whose values we help to shape — values of inclusion, mutual respect, and open dialogue.

Here Rivkin is advocating something beyond influencing Muslims in France. He is stating that a significant part of the program will be directed towards cultivating French youth, the potential leaders, in “American” ideals, under the façade of French ideals.

CENA DE ESTADO EN HONOR DE FRANCOIS HOLLANDEThe US State Department and their corporate allies and allied NGOs intend to “shape their values.” The globalist program for France is stated clearly enough to be the re-education of French youth. One would think that this is the most important role of the French Government, the Catholic Church and the family; the latter two in particular.

As in the states that are chosen for “velvet revolutions” part of the strategy includes demarcating acceptable political boundaries. As Hillary Clinton recently stated in regard to the type of state the US Establishment expects to emerge after Qaddafi, the new Libya should be an “inclusive democracy,” open to all opinions, as long as those opinions include a commitment to “equality” and “democracy;” in other words, there must be a new dispensation of freedom in Libya, so long as that freedom does not extend beyond America’s definition of it.

And if someone oversteps the lines of acceptable democracy, there are American bombs on the standby. In the context of France, however, it is clear that the demarcation of French politics according to globalist dictates cannot include any elements of so-called “xenophobia,” which in today’s context would include a return to the grand politics of the De Gaulle era. Hence, “Tactic 5″ states:

Fifth, we will continue our project of sharing best practices with young leaders in all fields, including young political leaders of all moderate parties so that they have the toolkits and mentoring to move ahead. We will create or support training and exchange programs that teach the enduring value of broad inclusion to schools, civil society groups, bloggers, political advisors, and local politicians.

Rivkin is outlining a program to train France’s future political and civic leaders. While the programs of US Government-backed NGOs such as the National Endowment for Democracy are designed to develop entire programs and strategies for political parties in “emerging democracies”, this can be rationalized by stating that there is a lack of experience in liberal-democratic party politics in certain states. The same can hardly be used to justify America’s interference in France’s party politics.

Towards this end Rivkin states that the 1000 American English language teachers employed at French schools will be provided with the propaganda materials necessary to inculcate the desired ideals into their French pupils: “We will also provide tools for teaching tolerance to the network of over 1,000 American university students who teach English in French schools every year.”

The wide-ranging program will be coordinated by the “Minority Working Group” in “tandem” with the “Youth Outreach Initiative.” One of the issues monitored by the Group will be the “decrease in popular support for xenophobic political parties and platforms.” This is to ensure that the program is working as it should, to block the success of any “extreme” or “xenophobic” party that might challenge globalization.

Rivkin clarifies the subversive nature of the program when stating: “While we could never claim credit for these positive developments, we will focus our efforts in carrying out activities, described above, that prod, urge and stimulate movement in the right direction.”

What would the reaction be if the French Government through its Embassy in Washington undertook a program to radically change the USA in accordance with “French national interests,” inculcating through an “aggressive outreach program” focusing on youth, “French ideals” under the guise of “American ideals on human rights?”

What would be the response of the US Administration if it was found that the French Government was trying to influence the attitudes of Afro-Americans, American-Indians, and Latinos?

What if French officials were ordered to take every opportunity to “press” US officials to ask why there are not more American Indians in Government positions?

What would be the official US reaction if it were found that French language educators in American schools and colleges were trying to inculcate American pupils with ideas in the service of French interests, and to reshape attitudes towards in a pro-French direction in foreign policy?

The hypothetical reaction can be deduced from the US response to the “Soviet conspiracy” when Senate and Congressional committees were set up to investigate anyone even vaguely associated with or accused of being aligned to the USSR. So what’s different?

The USA perpetrates a subversive strategy in the interests of it globalist cooperate elite, instead of in the interests of the USSR or communism. It is not as though the USA has had much of a cultural heritage that it can present itself to any European nation, let alone France, as the paragon of good taste and artistic refinement upon which a national identity can be reconstructed in a dialectical process that requires cultural deconstruction.

renzi-hollande-cameron-obamaThe Role of Multiculturalism in the Globalist Agenda – Many nefarious aims have been imposed under the banners of multiculturalism and associated slogans such as “equality” and “human rights.” Like the word “democracy,” used to justify the bombing of sundry states in recent history, these slogans often serve as rhetoric to beguile the well-intentioned while hiding the aims of those motivated by little if anything other than power and greed.

One might think of the manner by which the issue of the Uitlanders was agitated to justify the Anglo-Boer wars for the purpose of procuring the mineral wealth of South Africa for the benefit of Cecil Rhodes, Alfred Beit, et al.

A similar issue was revived in our own time, under the name of “fighting apartheid,” and while the world was jubilant at the assumption to power of the ANC, the reality has been that while the Africans have not benefited materially an iota, the parastatals or state owned enterprises are being privatized so that they can be sold off to global capitalism.

When the patriarch of South African capitalism, Harry Oppenheimer, whose family was a traditional foe of the Afrikaners, died in 2000 Nelson Mandela eulogized him thus: “His contribution to building partnership between big business and the new democratic government in that first period of democratic rule can never be appreciated too much.”

The “democracy” Oppenheimer and other plutocrats in tandem with the ANC, had delivered to South Africa is the freedom for global capital to exploit the country. Mandela stated the result of this “long march to freedom” in 1996: “Privatization is the fundamental policy of the ANC and will remain so.”

It is the same outcome for South Africa that was achieved by the “liberation” of Kosovan minerals in the name of “democracy” and in the name of the rights of Muslims under Serb rule, while other Muslims under their own rule are bombed into submission by the USA and its allies.

In commenting on the privatization of the Johannesburg municipal water, which is now under the French corporation Suez Lyonnaise Eaux, the ANC issued a statements declaring that: “Eskom is one of a host of government owned ‘parastatals’ created during the apartheid era which the democratically elected government has set out to privatize in a bid to raise money.”

The future of parastatals is more relevant to understating what happened in South Africa than the overthrow of apartheid; and provides a case study in the operations of globalism.

The Character of Global Capitalism – The nature of the globalist dialectic has been explained particularly cogently by Noam Chomsky:

See, capitalism is not fundamentally racist – it can exploit racism for its purposes, but racism isn’t built into it. Capitalism basically wants people to be interchangeable cogs, and differences among them, such as on the basis of race, usually are not functional. I mean, they may be functional for a period, like if you want a super exploited workforce or something, but those situations are kind of anomalous.

Over the long term, you can expect capitalism to be anti-racist — just because it’s anti-human. And race is in fact a human characteristic — there’s no reason why it should be a negative characteristic, but it is a human characteristic. So therefore identifications based on race interfere with the basic ideal that people should be available just as consumers and producers, interchangeable cogs who will purchase all the junk that’s produced — that’s their ultimate function, and any other properties they might have are kind of irrelevant, and usually a nuisance.

kerry and hollande

France as a Social Laboratory for Globalization: Paris as a “Global City” – The Rivkin offensive is the latest in a long-time program of undermining French identity. France is a dichotomy of cosmopolitanism as the result of its bourgeoisie revolution of 1789, while nonetheless maintaining a stubborn traditionalism and nationalism, which the globalists term “xenophobia.”

It is manifested in even small ways such as the legal obligation of French public servants and politicians to only speak to foreign media in French, regardless of their knowledge of any other language; or the widespread resistance in France to McDonald’s.

France, like much of the rest of the world, is however fighting a losing battle against globalization. Jeff Steiner’s column “Americans in France,” refers to the manner by which the French at one time resisted the opening of the American fast food franchise as “part of an American cultural invasion.” Steiner writes:

…That seems to be past as McDonalds has so become a part of French culture that it’s not seen as an American import any longer, but wholly French. In short, McDonalds has grown on the French just like in so many other countries.

I’ve been to a few McDonalds in France and, except for one in Strasbourg that looks from the outside to be built in the traditional Alsacien style, all McDonalds in France that I have seen look no different than their American counterparts.

Yes, there are those that still curse McDo (They are now a very small group and mostly ignored.) as the symbol of the Americanization of France and who also see it as France losing its uniqueness in terms of cuisine. The menu in a French McDonalds is almost an exact copy of what you would find in any McDonalds in the United States. It struck me as a bit odd that I could order as I would in the United States, that is in English, with the odd French preposition thrown in.

If truth were told, the French who eat at McDonalds are just as much at home there as any American could be.

This seemingly minor example is actually of much importance in showing just how a culture as strong as that of, until recently, an immensely proud nation, can succumb, especially under the impress of marketing towards youngsters. It is a case study par excellence of the standardization that American corporate culture entails. It is what the globalist elite desire on a world scale, right down to what one eats.

It is notable that the vanguard of the initial resistance to the opening of McDonald’s came from farmers, a traditionalist segment of Europe’s population that are becoming increasingly anomalous, and will under the globalist regime become an extinct species in the process of agricultural corporatization.

Nonetheless, given France’s historical role of maintaining sovereignty in the face of US interests, even in the current time with its opposition to the war against Iraq, France remains one of the few potentially annoying states in Europe.

An added concern is that the French, despite their acceptance of McDonald’s, and their liking for American trash TV, will translate the remnants of their “xenophobia” into the election to Office of a stridently anti-globalist party, as reflected in the electoral ups and downs of the Front National, whose policy would not be in accord with either US foreign policy, or with privatization and cultural Americanization.

Hence the Front National [Marine Le Pen], like other anti-globalist parties, can be attacked by red-herring slogans about “racism” and “hate” to deflect from the real concern which is anti-globalization.

terrorist paris 1This is a major reason for Rivkin’s far-reaching subversive and interventionist program to assimilate Muslims into French society, which in so doing would also have the result of fundamentally transforming French consciousness into a more thoroughly cosmopolitan mold.

The intention is clear enough in the Rivkin Embassy documents where it is stated that the Embassy will monitor the effects of the paris bombing 4“outreach” program on the “decrease in popular support for xenophobic political parties and platforms.”

R J Barnet and R E Müller in their study of the global corporation, Global Reach, which was based on interviews with corporate executives, showed that the French business elite have long been seeking to undermine the foundations of French tradition. Jacques Maisonrouge, president of the IBM World Trade Corporation “likes to point out that; ‘Down with borders’, a revolutionary student slogan of the 1968 Paris university uprising – in which some of his children were involved – is also a welcome slogan at IBM.” Maisonrouge stated that the “World Managers” (as Barnett and Muller call the corporate executives) believe they are making the world “smaller and more homogeneous.” Maisonrouge approvingly described the global corporate executive as “the detribalized, international career men.” It is this “detribalization” that is the basis of a world consumer culture required to more efficiently create a world economy.

In the 1970s Howard Perlmutter and Hasan Ozekhan of the Wharton School of Finance Worldwide Institutions Programme prepared a plan for a “global city.” Paris was chosen for the purpose. Prof. Perlmutter was a consultant to global corporations.

His plan was commissioned by the French Government planning agency on how best to make Paris a “global city.” Perlmutter predicted that cities would become “global cities” during the 1980s. For Paris this required “becoming less French” and undergoing “denationalization.” This, he said, requires a “psycho-cultural change of image with respect to the traditional impression of ‘xenophobia’ that the French seem to exclude.”

The parallels with the current Rivkin program are apparent. Perlmutter suggested that the best way of ridding France of its nationalism was to introduce multiculturalism. He advocated “the globalization of cultural events” such as international rock festivals, as an antidote to “overly national and sometimes nationalistic culture.”

Is this aim of undermining France’s “overly national and sometimes nationalistic culture” the purpose of Rivkin’s interest in associations between Hollywood and French culture, as reported by the PCIP itself in regard to the delegation that met in France in 2010, when, “the delegation explored the connections between media and culture in California (Hollywood) and France.”

Rivkin knows the value of entertainment in transforming attitudes, especially among the young. After working as a corporate finance analyst at Salomon Brothers, Rivkin joined The Jim Henson Company in 1988 as director of strategic planning. Two years later, he was made vice president of the company. The Jim Henson Company, while producing the endearing characters of “Sesame Street,” had a social agenda directed at toddlers.

The social engineering purpose becomes evident when one recalls that the production was funded by the Ford Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation, and the US Office of Education. Lawrence Balter, professor of applied psychology at New York University, wrote of the production that it, “…introduced children to a broad range of ideas, information, and experiences about diverse topics such as death, cultural pride, race relations, people with disabilities, marriage, pregnancy, and even space exploration.”

The series was the first to employ educational researchers, with the formation of a Research Department. Of passing interest is that the Carnegie Corporation and the Ford Foundation are also patrons of the Pacific Council on International Policy. Whether one thinks that such methods aimed at pre-schoolers are laudable depends on one’s perspective, just as one might agree with the Rivkin program of inculcating French youth with globalist ideals in the service of “American interests.”

Francois Hollande - President ObamaCreating the World Consumer: Homo Economicus: “The Global Me” – As Chomsky has pointed out, global capitalism sees humanity in terms interchangeable cogs in the production and consumption cycle.

The summit of corporate human evolution is transformation into “detribalized, international career men” described enthusiastically by G Pascal Zachary, financial journalist, as being an “informal global aristocracy”, recruited over the world by the corporations, depending totally on their companies and “little upon the larger public,” a new class unhindered by national, cultural or ethnic bonds.

Barnett and Müller quoted Pfizer’s John J Powers as stating that global corporations are “agents for change, socially, economically and culturally.” They stated that global executives see “irrational nationalism” as inhibiting “the free flow of finance capital, technology and goods on a global scale.”

A crucial aspect of nationalism is that “differences in psychological and cultural attitudes, that complicate the task of homogenizing the earth into an integrated unit…. Cultural nationalism is also a serious problem because it threatens the concept of the Global Shopping Center.”

It is this “cultural nationalism” which is described by Rivkin, and all other partisans of globalism, as “xenophobia,” unless that “xenophobia” can be marshaled in the service of a military adventure when bribes, embargoes and threats don’t bring a reticent state into line, as in the cases of Serbia, Iraq, and perhaps soon, Libya. Then the American globalist elite and their allies become “patriots,” but still don’t seem to do much combat.

Barnet and Müller cite A W Clausen when he headed the Bank of America, as stating that national, cultural and racial differences create “marketing problems”, lamenting that there is “no such thing as a uniform, global market.” Harry Heltzer, Chief Executive Officer of 3M stated that global corporations are a “powerful voice for world peace because their allegiance is not to any nation, tongue, race or creed but to one of the finer aspirations of mankind, that the people of the world may be united in common economic purpose.”

These “finer aspirations of mankind,” known in other quarters as greed, avarice, Mammon-worship… have despoiled the earth, caused economic imbalance, and operate on usury that was in better times regarded as sin. These “finer aspirations,” by corporate reckoning, have caused more wars than any “xenophobic” dictator, usually in the name of “world peace,” and “democracy.”

The Rivkin doctrine for France — which must be carried out in a subtle manner — is a far-reaching subversive program to transform especially the young into global clones devoid of cultural identity, while proceeding, in the manner of Orwellian “doublethink” in the name of “multiculturalism.”  In 2017 Presidential Candidate Marine Le Pen represents an existential threat to that objective.


Research Links:


Question: All further migration from mainly Muslim countries should be stopped?

Agree 61%
Disagree 16%

This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Brexit, Christian Values, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Cultural Marxism, Death By Illegal Alien, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Donald Trump, European Union, Islam, Jihad, media bias, Muslim Grievance Industry - MGI, Political correctness/cultural marxism, President Trump, propaganda, Secretary of State, Secretary Tillerson, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

216 Responses to U.S. State Department Begins Effort To Undermine French Election and Utilize “The Vast Russian Conspiracy”…

  1. CaptainNonno says:

    Lord, the world is truly controlled by wealthy puppet masters. This is their entertainment. Spinning the commoners in the wind, pulling the wings off flies etc. there is only one real solution.

    Liked by 13 people

    • cohibadad says:

      I hope everyone keeps in mind that we are the enemy, no matter who they say it is, it is really us in the big sense, the vast majority of humans. I agree with much of what you say, and I agree that there is only one real solution, but what is yours?

      Liked by 2 people

      • All American Snowflake says:

        The globalist hate you. They kill American babies and insert their multiculturalism.

        Liked by 3 people

        • cohibadad says:

          Yes. They hate everyone except themselves. They love and worship themselves, and in the battle for the ultimate gene line, they have a plan to win it all. And if was not for God and His plan, they would. Fortunately, they are simply deluding themselves.

          Liked by 2 people

          • “For then there will be great distress, unequaled from the beginning of the world until now–and never to be equaled again. And except those days should be shortened, (unless those days were limited) no one would survive. But those days will be limited because of the elect.” ~ Matthew 24:21,22

            Liked by 1 person

            • cohibadad says:

              Excellent. I was just thinking of Matthew 24:24 yesterday because of the lunar eclipse and comet and the solar eclipse in a couple of weeks: Matthew 24:24

              For false christs and false prophets will arise and perform great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray, if possible, even the elect.

              Liked by 1 person

  2. mcclainra says:

    To say that this is explosive, is putting it mildly. Totally overwhelmed, but certainly puts a lot out front that we should have seen. Sundance, you have outdone yourself, yet again! I sent the link to Breitbart & asked them to post it, or part of it, and link back here since it is pretty long. Maybe if they get more requests, they will do so. Also posted on social media. If there was a way to send to Tillerson & others, would certainly do so. Just hope they are reading this.

    Liked by 5 people

  3. Texian says:

    There’s a lot to chew on in this article, and it will take quite a few rereads to grasp all the details. What stood out from the first round, is “Minerals.” Now the globalists are all in for the climate-change-finite-resource camp. The average liberal really believes that nonsense. They cannot grasp the concept of a basic high school chemistry equation – energy goes in, the same amount of energy goes out, it all balances. You cannot breach this basic law of the universe. (There is an unlimited resource of energy in the universe – electromagnetic – and Nicola Tesla discovered how to harness it, but that is another story). In the meantime, nothing has changed over the millennia from caveman till the present – the fight for resources. “Mineral rich Kosovo”, “mineral wealth South Africa”, and the grand prize – the mineral wealth of the United States. It is all about resources, because resources is Power. Energy rules the World.

    Retaking the Executive Branch has given us the chance to save the world. The Legislative and Judicial Branches are still in the hands of the enemy. The climatic battle of this Fourth Turning is fast approaching, we must take that Hill without fail. Give the enemy no quarter – leftist liberals cannot be rehabilitated – they must be destroyed. Cut the cord with anybody liberal.. leave them on the side of the road; why would you aid and abet the enemy who ultimately wants to destroy you? Only one side comes out alive and victorious in Fourth Turnings, you have to make a choice – be the Victor.. or be the Victim.. our ‘Greatest Moment’ since “The Greatest Generation” lay just over the horizon.. how do you want our Generation – You -, to be remembered in the annals of History – the ones who lost “The World”.. or the ones who were.. “Victorious..”

    Liked by 5 people

    • susiepuma says:

      WE have retaken the Executive Branch, but don’t kid yourself. Our President is surrounded by subversives who still intend to impeach him and install Pence. I wish I could feel sorry for President Trump’s daughter and son-in-law but I don’t. They are liberal political neophytes and being played like a fiddle by the #neverTrumpers. That is so sad. She claims to love her father but is helping to put a knife in his back.

      Liked by 1 person

      • soozword says:

        Seems like so far we have a figurehead for the State Dept., but Tillerson still has yet to prove himself since he just got into office. Give him at least a month to crack some heads and perhaps we can then say we have taken control of the State Dept. To say that now seems much too premature.

        Liked by 2 people

      • DS says:

        You are the first person I’ve seen to mention this, but I also am really wary of Ivanka and her husband Jared. They are liberal leaning, at the very least, and his father is a crook. For me the screaming red flag is that Jares’s lawyer is Jamie Gorelick !!! Not too many swamp creatures as slimy as she is. I trust Trump and his 3D chess abilities, but we all know the importance he places on his daughter and he has to really be careful b/c it could be a big blindspot. Words cannot convey how dangerous I think it is having Jared Kushner as his trusted advisor…


  4. Unclezeb says:

    The article mentions Pepsi. It the whole time I was reading it the Coca Cola commercial was playing in my head, “if I could teach the world to sing in perfect harmony……..”

    If you pay attention, they telegraph their intentions.

    They are playing the long game. Been going on for years.

    Liked by 11 people

    • Unclezeb says:

      I hate auto correct.

      *But the whole time….


    • quintrillion says:

      All multi-national corporation are in on this pay ops. Boo Hoo marketing departments have a hard time developing a plan when we are all so tribal and different. More than I hate the media, I hate marketing.

      Liked by 4 people

    • susiepuma says:

      Exactly, I hated that song the first time I heard it way back in the day. I never joined the hippie cult and that miserable song made me think of the whole hippie movement. Most of you are probably too young to remember that but it was the same circus that is happening now…….except that the current hippie class is much bigger and are turning violent against whomever gets in their way……………(of course the Weather Underground, SDS, etc. were just as dirty and perverted as the current organizations & yes the above are still in action.

      Liked by 5 people

      • JoAnn Leichliter says:

        Yes, susiepuma, I remember those times quite well. Plenty of violence then, too, and a lot of it blowing up stuff and murdering people–you know, like Obama’s good buddies back in the day. And yes, I remember that sappy, crappy song.


    • Somewhere in Dixie says:

      Yes, how about It’s a small world exhibit at Disney?


  5. Mike says:

    Trump’s first real political test:

    State Department Doubles Refugee Inflow Since Court Ruling, Most From Terror-Prone Countries


    Will Trump fire Rex Tillerson? Who does the state dept. work for, the executive or the judiciary? Will he just let this continue along in the un-constitutional courts?


    • boogywstew says:

      I don’t think they are exactly “new” refugees as much as sludge that was still stuck in the pipeline after it was shut off.


  6. jefcool64 says:

    What a post, you must have been working on this one for a while. France has too much history to have it’s identity be swept easily away in the name of globalism.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. John Galt says:

    Putin controls the entire world operating from a country with the 12th ranked GDP. Yeah, that’s the ticket.

    Liked by 4 people

  8. Rip Tide says:

    Sundance, thank you for the chilling article, your research, and your leadership!
    As I was reading this, I decided I was going to take a half-day off from work to really chew on this stuff. It is so enlightening to read this! It made me think of scripture passages in Daniel OT, and in Revelation 13 which describe the concept of a coming one world order/one world government. I recommend we all invest some time reading and meditating on those books to see what we are really up against.

    Thank God that all believers will be spared the Tribulation! But, the times leading up to that will be perilous to be sure. I believe Donald Trump was given favor by our Lord, and He heard our prayers for deliverance. We now have a leader who I believe understands these issues. We do not know when the end will come. ““But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.”
    ‭‭Matthew‬ ‭24:36‬ ‭NIV‬‬

    Our job is to keep fighting, and to win as many souls over that we can. Live in the truth, speak the truth, and meditate on the truth.

    Thank you again Sundance for your leadership, CTH for the platform to share our hearts FREELY, and to my fellow treepers for your insight, fellowship, and encouragement👍👍👍.

    Liked by 8 people

    • deanbrh says:

      In this tiny little treehouse, we puny few souls… It feels so hopeless, like we have arrived here too late, but I will pray with all my might and soldier on anyway.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Texian says:

        Have you no Faith grasshoppa.. During the Revolutionary war, what percentage out of the total colonial population fought against the British tyranny? (I’ll give you a hint..)..

        Liked by 1 person

    • Tell you what, though, Rip Tide. Revelations was written in about 200 CE, or AD, when the single world government in operation at the time was in the process of crashing down! Yep – the Roman Empire was on the verge of collapse.

      Anybody with a brain could see it was on the way down. However, it took 200 more years and the fall was excruciating. I’m studying the period and it is both worse and not as bad as most of us imagine.


  9. Mike diamond says:

    Russia this and Russia that,Obama became good friends with Iran,and every body in the middle east except Israel,who has been our life long friend! Where was the news media out rage! did chuckle schummeer get mad at Obama?? No chuckie did nothing! Notice now the news media is acting like their so worried about Russia,give me and all of us a break,what a scam on their part,they kissed Obama every day.Obama was the worst president in our history.

    Liked by 7 people

  10. brucefdb says:

    The problem for Deplorables everywhere is that the frog is waking up as the water is starting to boil.

    Liked by 4 people

  11. cohibadad says:

    Great well thought out article. I guess the only question is, is there another level to this game? My guess is this: all opposition will continue as we have seen with Brexit and Trump and it will be applied to Le Pen, but miraculously she will win, despite the lying globalist media, the xenophobic claims, etc. I have always felt, and continue to believe even more strongly, that the game is more complicated than almost any single human can grasp.

    Liked by 4 people

    • All American Snowflake says:

      Iron will never mix with clay. Metallurgy purification [Trump, Brexit, Le Pen, et.al.] takes out the clay [Hillary, EU, multiculturalism, etc.].

      “Finally, there will be a fourth kingdom, strong as iron–for iron breaks and smashes everything–and as iron breaks things to pieces, so it will crush and break all the others. Just as you saw that the feet and toes were partly of baked clay and partly of iron, so this will be a divided kingdom; yet it will have some of the strength of iron in it, even as you saw iron mixed with clay. As the toes were partly iron and partly clay, so this kingdom will be partly strong and partly brittle. And just as you saw the iron mixed with baked clay, so the people will be a mixture and will not remain united, any more than iron mixes with clay. In the time of those kings, the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be destroyed, nor will it be left to another people. It will crush all those kingdoms and bring them to an end, but it will itself endure forever.” ~Daniel 2:40-43

      Liked by 1 person

      • cohibadad says:

        Excellent again! Daniel. It is speaking about now.


      • cohibadad says:

        All American Snowflake, I would love to hear what you think about these verses of Daniel. I’ve contemplated them for quite some time. It seems to me that they are saying that this fourth kingdom of Iron breaks and smashes everything, but it has a weakness, its mixture with clay. And in the time of the kings of the Iron kingdom, God will set up a kingdom that will never be destroyed, nor will it be left to another people, crushing the other kingdoms, bringing them to an end. And it makes mention of the feet and toes partly iron and partly clay, which refers to Daniel 2:33. And my understanding of this kingdom of God and the stone that became a mountain is the return of Jesus and the divine nation. Is it your understanding that the Iron kingdom is the United States? or the West? Because then it would appear that the kingdom of God and Jesus crush it and bring it to an end.


  12. James W Crawford says:

    Just a hint of history that will hopefully repeat itself if the French succumb to Islamic domination.


    The French fleet now includes 4 ballistic missile submarines each with up to 160, 1/2 megaton warheads.


  13. R-C says:

    In this human race of ours, there is always, always, some group out there bent on world domination.

    This outstanding essay is exposes the latest such group, scheming away behind the scenes.

    Liked by 5 people

  14. georgiafl says:

    THAT AIN’T ALL THE (insert expletives) State Department has done:

    Liked by 3 people

  15. Founding Fathers Fan says:

    Wolf Blitzer was born in Germany and his parents were ‘refugees’ in the US. I can find no documentation that they or he ever became US citizens.

    Liked by 3 people

  16. recoverydotgod says:

    Really great exposition, Sundance.

    As you write in your article, globalists use the word “democracy” for justification. They also use it by forcing the historical and textual embodiments of “democracy” (such as the US constitution, form of government and election process) to become the wedge between citizens rather than allow those historical and textual embodiments of “democracy” to continue to bring the path of national life to E Pluribus Unum.

    Regarding the CNN report about France’s election and the “Russian interference” …..Oi vei! Reminds me of a New York Times article from today. They keep trying to connect the dots into the frame they want people’s focus on. I think it is surprising to many globalists, swampers and those on the left that other people have managed to become well educated in spite of the higher education system, are well read and hold complete as well as complex thoughts.

    (from your article above)

    The Role of Multiculturalism in the Globalist Agenda – Many nefarious aims have been imposed under the banners of multiculturalism and associated slogans such as “equality” and “human rights.” Like the word “democracy,” used to justify the bombing of sundry states in recent history, these slogans often serve as rhetoric to beguile the well-intentioned while hiding the aims of those motivated by little if anything other than power and greed.

    New York Times
    Taboo Italian Thinker Is Enigma to Many, but Not to Bannon
    FEB. 10, 2017


    An intellectual descendant of Evola, Mr. Dugin has called for a “genuine, true, radically revolutionary, and consistent fascist fascism” and advocated a geography-based theory of “Eurasianism” — which has provided a philosophical framework for Mr. Putin’s expansionism and meddling in Western European politics.

    Mr. Dugin sees European Traditionalists as needing Russia, and Mr. Putin, to defend them from the onslaught of Western liberal democracy, individual liberty, and materialism — all Evolian bête noirs.



  17. Deborah says:

    Trump needs to get tougher on society. First beginning with the judges, Trump needs to Impeach judges for interfering with National Security and being insubordinate. Judges are interfering with the safety of this Country. This is beyond their pay grade and is not their calling on what is safe or not for this Country. Judges have got to go. Secondly, to call out National Guard when protest consist of over 500 people and especially when riots break out.


    • wheatietoo says:

      The President cannot call out the National Guard on US soil…except in times of war.
      This is why Bush could not call out the National Guard to help out after Hurricane Katrina.

      The governors of each state are the only ones who can call out the National Guard for ‘domestic unrest’.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Texian says:

        Ok, then.. what happens if a whole State is in “domestic unrest,” including its State Government leaders who are promulgating antithetical behavior in regard to the Constitution? [I know the answer to this question, by the way – and I know you do too]. So just “Say It! Say It!!

        Liked by 1 person

  18. Sursum corda says:

    This piece is absolute brilliance , brilliance. Now you know what’s been going on all these years. Incidentally, I figured that out about Sesame Street years ago. My kids have never watched Sesame Street, I won’t allow it.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. SezPlez says:

    This is not the first time SD has written on this subject. Shrouded in secret, the agenda of the NWO marches on. Perhaps Le Pen can win & hold them off a little longer.


  20. msmelchizadek says:

    SOS Tillerson’s Twitter page has been suspended!! I just tried to view his page and got this:


    Beyond Weird!!! Anyone else get that?

    Liked by 1 person

  21. boogywstew says:

    Interesting side note here … I use Google as a search engine and it refuses to recognize “Conservative Treehouse” with a prompt. Some sites I regularly go to like “Craigslist” will pop up whenever I hit the letter “c”. I go to the CTR as often as “Craigslist” but Google will not do this for me? The same thing with “Ann Coulter.com” … after years of going to her site a couple of times a week, Google still will not key her up first, even though she is far and away the most common “a” entry for me. Google will still put suggestions up for other “a” entries that I have NEVER gone to! I know my terminology here is inadequate, but I’m sure someone with more computer savvy can explain it?

    Liked by 1 person

    • All American Snowflake says:

      The explanation is that Google is anti-Trump and means to destroy any access to websites that encourage anti-globalization.

      Liked by 1 person

      • boogywstew says:

        Thanks for responding and what alternatives are recommended? I don’t want to have a search engine with an ideological bent, but one that’s as unbiased as possible. I want to have available BOTH sides of an issue. How is “Bing”? “Yahoo” is run by a leftist sympathizer I believe, but is he as overtly political in the running of his search engine?

        Liked by 1 person

        • All American Snowflake says:

          I don’t know. I do know how much the leftist hate us. I’m learning that very fast since Trump won the election.


        • Nightcrawler says:

          I haven’t used Google for a very long time but if memory serves, I believe you can ‘bookmark’ CTH and Ann Coulter, while you have them open. Bookmark them as ‘favorites’, then all you after that is click on that site via the ‘favorites’ button. In Yahoo (which is just as politically corrupt) you can create a bookmark toolbar and add sites and or folders of sites, etc.


        • wheatietoo says:

          I recommend DuckDuckGo…it’s a search engine that does not track you, and does not ‘filter’ your searches.


          Bing is owned by Microsoft, which is just as leftist as Google and Yahoo.

          Liked by 1 person

      • No. Google does not operate that way. Owners may be bad guys. Employees may be snowflakes or worse, but the algorithms are agnostic. However, if you don’t like it, get Mozilla Firefox, which I hate for their idiotic ideology, but is way better than IE for me!


        • boogywstew says:

          My web browser is currently Mozilla Firefox and I’m happy with that choice. Another stunt that “Google” is currently pulling is when I select “Breitbart”, “Google” makes sure that on the 1st URL, there will be advertisements at the top of the page for leftist sites … Huff Post – WaPo – Bloomburg – etc. where articles that are HIGHLY critical of “Breitbart” are displayed, in essence, letting the consumer know that “Breitbart” can’t be trusted. This is a recent change, one from this past election cycle.


  22. All American Snowflake says:

    The multicultural globalist are intent on shutting down the Internet. Recall that Hillary Clinton spoke of this when she realized she had lost the presidential race.

    Liked by 2 people

  23. Listening to The Senate telling me that anything less than all out hating Russia makes me a brainwashed individual – fallen prey to the evil empire.


  24. cjzak says:

    Guess I am naïve but isn’t Tillerson SOS now and working for Pres. Trump? Can’t they put the brakes on stuff like this? Not sure what to make of this at all.


  25. wheatietoo says:

    Thank you for delving into the complexities of the scourge of globalism, Sundance.

    It’s great to see Multiculturalism exposed for the diabolical construct that it is.
    It was designed to devalue and destroy the culture of any country that is foolish enough to embrace it.

    One small quibble though, about using Noam Chomsky’s definition of ‘Global Capitalism’…
    Chomsky is a leftist.
    He advocates anarchy and supports the Occupy Wall Street movement.

    What Chomsky was describing in that quote was more ‘Global Corporatism’ rather than capitalism.

    Capitalism is based on meritocracy…and as such, it is pro-consumer.
    Under pure unfettered capitalism, the consumer is offered a wide variety of products & services to choose from.
    The consumer determines which products & services are best, and those are the ones which prosper.

    Corporatism cuts down on that wide variety of consumer choices.
    It accomplishes this by preying on the freedoms that capitalism affords, such as buying up smaller companies, to eliminate competition…and thus controlling markets.

    So, Corporatism is actually anti-consumer, since it kills consumer choices…thus it cannot accurately be called ‘capitalism’.
    Chomsky calls it ‘Global Capitalism’ in order to demonize capitalism.

    Liked by 1 person

  26. Contrarymary says:

    When bush Jr was in office, I was wondering where a Christian would escape to if all hell broke loose. I asked the question.”what is the religion of Iceland”. It took me to a page telling of Iceland and explaining they were Lutheran, but the United States was putting pressure on them to open up their societies to Islam and to make accommodations for them to resettle them there. I looked up to see what site I was reading from and it was our own state department website. I saw, at that time, what a disgrace we had become. Bush was bringing vast amounts of Muslims here, but it was never reported in our news. I had to read it in the Jerusalem post or the London telegraph.

    Liked by 1 person

    • All American Snowflake says:

      Muslims are immigrating to, and terrorizing everywhere they go. They lie all the time. They think it’s a joke convince you with a lie.


  27. hellinahandbasket says:

    My comment here is late in coming, since I came-back this morning to re-read the entire post. For me, to decipher what’s going on within the State Department, the CFR, and Trilateral-Commission, is an important factor in figuring-out what’s going on in every American foreign relation.
    History repeats itself… important to remember the late Senator Joe McCarthy was 100% correct, in his attempted flushing-out of the State Department Swamp back in the 1950’s – and it’s a YUGE mistake, once again, to NOT recognize the duplicitous push-back he received (across the board, from both political parties), playing-out at the same levels right now at President Trump’s unwavering-will, to remove the State Department’s infiltration of treasonous evil-doers.
    History repeats itself… more so when nothing was done in the first place to turn American history onto the correct path, shown by the past 1/2-century since Senator McCarthy’s warnings. America has consistently headed down that same war-filled, crushing economic filled, distention among Americans filled path over and over again, quantifiably more to come, than ever before – because of the infestation within the State Department (ie Hillary Clinton as the top-dog of dogs).
    A very interesting read, if you haven’t done so already: The Real McCarthy Record:

    I hope others will transport back in time, and give a read to the revelations and discoveries late Senator Joe McCarthy tried to tell Americans about, and later proven accurate, but was scorned and labeled evil in doing so.
    History does repeat itself … President Trump and his administration = scorned evil.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s