WikiLeaks Email Shows How Corrupt CNN Scripted Debates/Town Halls To Benefit Hillary Clinton…

Inside the latest WikiLeaks release is another email from CNN’s Donna Brazile to Hillary Clinton’s team giving them advanced notice of a Debate/Town Hall question (link).

donna brazile 2tapper-solo

wikileaks-brazile-heads-up-2(link)

This is the second email which outlines Hillary Clinton being given advanced notification of specific debate questions which will be posed to her – Previous Outline Here.

However, the more revealing aspect to this email is the nature of the scripted narrative by CNN being used.  Not only did Brazile give Clinton a head’s up to the question, but Brazile also knew in advance the specific audience member who was going to ask the question.

 

[…] One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash…

This highlights something previously outlined about CNN carefully creating a script to the benefit of their preferred ideological candidate(s), and in opposition to the candidate(s) that CNN opposes.

In the republican presidential primary we called attention to how CNN carefully and intentionally was scripting an outcome.  The scripted ambushes happened in New Hampshire (October 2015), and it happened in South Carolina (February 2016):

feminismdr oran smith 4

As a result of the WikiLeaks revelations CNN has presumably “fired” Donna Brazile.

[…]  In a statement, CNN spokeswoman Lauren Pratapas said that on Oct. 14, the network accepted Brazile’s resignation.

“On October 14th, CNN accepted Donna Brazile’s resignation as a CNN contributor. (Her deal had previously been suspended in July when she became the interim head of the DNC.) CNN never gave Brazile access to any questions, prep material, attendee list, background information or meetings in advance of a town hall or debate. We are completely uncomfortable with what we have learned about her interactions with the Clinton campaign while she was a CNN contributor,” Pratapas said. (more)

However, that tepid response doesn’t address the underlying issues of: A) the Clinton campaign willingly accepting the advanced notifications, and B) CNN now clearly evidenced to be working to benefit some candidates to the detriment of others.

cnn-super-pac

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Dem Hypocrisy, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Donald Trump, Election 2016, media bias, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized, Wikileaks. Bookmark the permalink.

238 Responses to WikiLeaks Email Shows How Corrupt CNN Scripted Debates/Town Halls To Benefit Hillary Clinton…

  1. NJF says:

    Lol. Seeing a clip of Shillary from today referring to Huma as “someone on my staff.”

    I guess she’s officially disowned her “2nd daughter.”

    Liked by 11 people

  2. zephyrbreeze says:

    Have we figured out any reasons that Megyn Kelly met with Ivanka for 2 hours at a breakfast meeting – in public? Trump courting Kelly for his own media network?

    Liked by 2 people

  3. 2x4x8 says:

    its de-lightful
    its de-licious
    its de-lovely

    more winning please

    Liked by 9 people

  4. Ron MacDonald says:

    Shouldn’t Brazile be held accountable by congress for what she did?

    Liked by 5 people

    • KBR says:

      Shouldn’t CNN?

      Shouldn’t Hillary?

      Liked by 7 people

    • CheeseHead says:

      What is congress???

      Liked by 3 people

    • Bert Darrell says:

      Held accountable by congress? What is that? When was the last time Congress held anybody accountable for anything? I heard an old story about something called Watergate but, after the senate failed to hold Bill Clinton accountable, I thought Watergate was just a story. /S

      Liked by 5 people

    • LKA in LA says:

      At a minimum, Reince Preibus should file a complaint with CNN and the DNC. Do a press conf or something. Something and/or anything would help. He really is worthless and I hope Mr. Trump tells him to get lost after this election is over. I hope he doesn’t even get invited to the inauguration because he could have done more.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Trumpsboyz says:

    Get the Clinton’s passports, there about to run.

    Liked by 3 people

  6. KBR says:

    Ask CNN (every Twitter acct of CNN talking heads)
    “So, now that Donna’s gone, do you know who will be forewarning Hillary about all interview questions CNN asks?”

    Liked by 4 people

  7. Major Styles says:

    Aaaaaannnnnddd…not surprised.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. jessinwis says:

    Dona Brazile got fired only because she got caught. What is the penalty for media who misguide the public? They have a tremendous public trust, they basically are paid by us through advertising dollars-is there no other recourse than to boycott products and refuse to watch? Is there no standard for decency in the media?

    Liked by 2 people

  9. Watcher says:

    Cnn reports dws had her finger on the scale.
    Hippocrates

    https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4853

    Liked by 2 people

  10. 3x1 says:

    CNN should be barred from future debates for this.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Trumpedinillinos says:

      Yes.

      Liked by 1 person

      • When trump wins, pull their wh press credentials. CNN only has itself to blame. Bad company. Throwing a major party nomination. Putting in the fix. Real ethical.
        Bernie has said what about this? Trump branded him perfect too. When blm took Bernies mic, trump warned them don’t try that here, I not a wimp like Bernie. We will fight.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Bert Darrell says:

          Forget about Bernie. He was a fraud from the get go; a Clinton puppet propped up to look like competition. Bernie knew he had no chance whatsoever and did it for the $$$$. After endorsing Hillary, Bernie went on a luxury spending spree. Where did he get the $$$$?

          Liked by 3 people

          • 3x1 says:

            Bernie would be the opposition candidate had Hillary not fraudulently stolen the primary.

            We may not agree on principles, but he was schlonged by the Uniparty and his supporters have every right to be livid.

            Don’t forget it was the DNC branch of the Uniparty that had Seth Rich killed.

            Whatever Bernie does now may well be due to threats to him or his family. That’s how the Clintons roll.

            Any suppprt for Trump or opposition to Clinton is welcomed.

            Like

  11. Apfelcobbler says:

    Brazile’s function as a CNN “guest” at CNN was to screw over Bernie supporters. RIGGED!

    Liked by 2 people

  12. Nick says:

    I was just on CNN and I found these two headlines one on top of each other to be pretty hilarious: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/758851/fakenews.png

    Like

  13. AghastInFL says:

    A tweet of the obvious:
    ALWAYS TRUMP!‏ @Always_Trump
    Guys, you’re missing the point… This isn’t about Donna Brazile. The point is that HILLARY CHEATED IN THE DEBATES #HillaryForPrision
    https://mobile.twitter.com/Always_Trump/status/793154982497361920

    Liked by 5 people

  14. Wayne Robinson says:

    Further more there is no reason for any media to ask Hillary any question about the recently discovered emails on Weiners devices . We have already been down the road of Hillary stonewalling and lying about this crap for months anyone doubting that Hillary will lie then cover her lies with more lies only to be found out and lie somemore . Thats all that is there its the only tool in her toolbox . That is not going to change it is what it is as it always has been same with the rapist Bill Clinton PERIOD

    Like

    • ladypenquin says:

      As long as there is an active investigation, the FBI et al would be breaking the law to disclose what they have or expect to find. That comes at the end, but it must be big or they would have waited…

      Like

  15. Alleycats says:

    The wheels on the bus go ’round and ’round
    ’round and ’round, ’round and ’round…

    You betcha, he he he he…

    Best election in the history of elections. Ever.

    Liked by 4 people

  16. paulgilpin says:

    why is there a picture of don king in the heading of this article?

    Liked by 1 person

  17. Sherry Tang says:

    CNN lost its credibility to public through its 100% biased standing at this election.

    Like

  18. Sherlock says:

    BREAKING: Get your pitchforks ready, folks. Pedestal buddy to handle DOJ expedited inspection of Weiner/Huma/Hillary emails. Under every rock…
    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-31/doj-tells-congress-it-will-work-expeditiously-review-abedin-emails-there-just-one-pr

    Liked by 1 person

  19. Apfelcobbler says:

    Donna’s little helper

    Liked by 3 people

  20. theduchessofkitty says:

    Wikileaks is very clear on the Russia issue.

    Liked by 4 people

  21. sysconfig says:

    The DOJ just rigged the Email Investigation
    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-31/doj-tells-congress-it-will-work-expeditiously-review-abedin-emails-there-just-one-pr

    John Podesta’s Best Friend At The DOJ Will Be In Charge Of The DOJ’s Probe Into Huma Abedin Emails
    Tyler Durden’s picture
    by Tyler Durden
    Oct 31, 2016 4:36 PM
    0
    SHARES

    Now that the FBI has obtained the needed warrant to start poring over the 650,000 or so emails uncovered in Anthony Weiner’s notebook, among which thousands of emails sent from Huma Abedin using Hillary Clinton’s personal server, moments ago the US Justice Department announced it is also joining the probe, and as AP reported moments ago, vowed to dedicate all needed resources to quickly review the over half a million emails in the Clinton case.

    BREAKING: Justice Dept. says it'll dedicate all needed resources to quickly review emails in Clinton case.
    
    — The Associated Press (@AP) October 31, 2016
    

    In the letter to Congress, the DOJ writes that it “will continue to work closely with the FBI and together, dedicate all necessary resources and take appropriate steps as expeditiously as possible,” assistant attorney General Peter J. Kadzik writes in letters to House and Senate lawmakers.

    #BREAKING Senior DOJ official sends letter to lawmakers responding to request for more information about email review.#8days pic.twitter.com/PCgT2ODkQd
    
    — Just the Facts (@JTF_News) October 31, 2016
    

    So far so good, even if one wonders just how active the DOJ will be in a case that has shown an unprecedented schism between the politically influenced Department of Justice and the FBI.

    And yet, something felt odd about this.

    Kadzik… Kadzik… where have we heard that name?

    Oh yes. Recall our post from last week, “Clinton Campaign Chair Had Dinner With Top DOJ Official One Day After Hillary’s Benghazi Hearing” in which we reported that John Podesta had dinner with one of the highest ranked DOJ officials the very day after Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi testimony?

    It was Peter Kadzik.

    As the Daily Caller noted, the dinner arrangement “is just the latest example of an apparent conflict of interest between the Clinton campaign and the federal agency charged with investigating the former secretary of state’s email practices.” As one former U.S. Attorney tells told the DC, the exchanges are another example of the Clinton campaign’s “cozy relationship” with the Obama Justice Department.

    The hacked emails confirm that Podesta and Kadzik were in frequent contact. In one email from January, Kadzik and Podesta, who were classmates at Georgetown Law School in the 1970s, discussed plans to celebrate Podesta’s birthday. And in another sent last May, Kadzik’s son emailed Podesta asking for a job on the Clinton campaign.

    “The political appointees in the Obama administration, especially in the Department of Justice, appear to be very partisan in nature and I don’t think had clean hands when it comes to the investigation of the private email server,” says Matthew Whitaker, the executive director of the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust, a government watchdog group.

    “It’s the kind of thing the American people are frustrated about is that the politically powerful have insider access and have these kind of relationships that ultimately appear to always break to the benefit of Hillary Clinton,” he added, comparing the Podesta-Kadzik meetings to the revelation that Attorney General Loretta Lynch met in private with Bill Clinton at the airport in Phoenix days before the FBI and DOJ investigating Hillary Clinton.

    Kadzik’s role at the DOJ, where he started in 2013, is particularly notable Kadzik, as helped spearhead the effort to nominate Lynch, who was heavily criticized for her secret meeting with the former president.

    It gets better because, as we further revealed, if there is one person in the DOJ who is John Podesta’s, and thus the Clinton Foundation’s inside man, it is Peter Kadjik.

    Kadzik represented Podesta during the Monica Lewinsky investigation. And in the waning days of the Bill Clinton administration, Kadzik lobbied Podesta on behalf of Marc Rich, the fugitive who Bill Clinton controversially pardoned on his last day in office. That history is cited by Podesta in another email hacked from his Gmail account. In a Sept. 2008 email, which the Washington Free Beacon flagged last week, Podesta emailed an Obama campaign official to recommend Kadzik for a supportive role in the campaign. Podesta, who would later head up the Obama White House transition effort, wrote that Kadzik was a “fantastic lawyer” who “kept me out of jail.”

    Liked by 2 people

    • justlurking14 says:

      It seems like the DOJ just might not be paying close enough attention to Podesta’s email leaks.

      The DOJ is caught red-handed in the appointment of Kadzik, within hours of the appointment!

      Like

  22. justlurking14 says:

    I ran into a few tidbits of media nepotism while trying to figure out who Tom Nides is. Nides is in Podesta’s email advocating for getting a senior State lawyer to go through and delete the official emails on the Clinton server.

    Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Tom Nides, who turned in his resignation in February 2013 is married to CNN executive Virginia Moseley, according to a November 18, 2012 article by MSNBC.

    CBS News President David Rhodes and ABC News President Ben Sherwood, both of them have siblings that not only work at the White House, that not only work for President Obama, but they work at the National Security Council (NSC) on foreign policy issues directly related to Benghazi.

    White House Press Secretary Jay Carney is married to ABC News contributor Claire Shipman, according to her official biography on the ABC News website.

    https://www.truthorfiction.com/white-house-media-relations-052013/

    I remember some of this stuff from a while back. It all has newfound significance with Podesta’s emails in hand.

    Liked by 2 people

  23. 4bleu says:

    As everyone gets into the bigger details, still am scratching the head about why the all the need for the furtive question passing? The dems give the media the talking points and the sujet de jour, so how confused are they that they had to ask for completely predictable questions that are taken strictly off the narrative they themselves created?
    Anyone in the audience the least bit surprised at the questions asked during the debates? No. But the campaign needed to get them in advance, shh-shh… so doesn’t that mean they can’t even remember their own story line?
    They have yet to ask the questions everyone wanted asked – and never will.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. UKExpat says:

    Deep down in their heart of hearts most half decent DemoncRATS, if thats not an oxymoron, know exactly what the Clintoons are. Thats why the very flawed USURPER OBOZO was able to win the nomination so easily against her in 2008. But this year is different the only other option was Bernie the COMMIE and even the most deluded LEFTIST DemoncRAT was not yet ready to go that far. So they were left with the LYING, CHEATING, CRIMINAL BUTCHER of BENGHAZI Killary Clintoon and the outcome was entirely predictable.

    Like

  25. bitterlyclinging says:

    Just business as usual at CNN and the rest of the presstitute community.
    Remember the George Stephanopolous entre for Sandra Fluke’s perpetually free birth control? Or both Candy Crowley and Buraq Hussein Obama jumping up simultaneously waving a stack of papers where Obama allegedly claimed the Benghazi murders were terrorist inspired in front a slack jawed Mitt Romney during the Second presidential debate.

    Like

  26. Ronnia says:

    CNN is corrupt. I used to watch. Not anymore after Wikileaks revealed how they fed debate questions to Democrats. Total SCUM news station. Compromised. We can’t believe anything they say now. Just like FBI can never again be viewed as a respectable law enforcement agency. Total joke. No respect. Bye. Thanks for the memories. Thank God you’ve all been exposed for the evil, corrupt, milktoast pieces of garbage you really are. The love of money is the root of all evil. Enjoy.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s