Day #10 – FBI Director James Comey Admits “Stonetear” is Paul Combetta During Hearing….

It has been 10 days since we originally presented the Stonetear Revelations on September 19th.

Yesterday, Ohio Representative Jim Jordan questioned FBI Director James Comey about the “Stonetear” Reddit posting. Director Comey admits that Stonetear is in fact Paul Combetta, and the “VERY VIP” was, indeed, Hillary Clinton.

Additionally Director Comey also stated the phrase “they” in the Combetta post  (ie. “Basically, they don’t want the VIP’s email address exposed to anyone“…) most likely included Hillary Clinton’s legal team. Watch:

However, stunningly Comey appears almost disingenuous about the action of Paul Combetta (it makes no difference to Comey) where Combetta scrubbed the postings in an attempt to cover-up/hide the original intent of the document manipulation (Sept.20th).

When questioned about whether he would re-open the investigation given this information Comey gave no response.  Even more alarming is Comey admitting the influencing agents behind the request to Combetta were most likely Cheryl Mills and Hillary Clinton’s legal team during their conversations on July 23rd and 24th 2014.

How the heck can Comey sit there with a straight face and say there was no reason to prosecute any of the participants in the email scheme, when he’s now admitting they carried forethought into the process on July 24th (Stonetear), and Paul Combetta himself exhibited consciousness of guilt in his actions trying to scrub the traces of that forethought only 9 days ago?   BULLSH*T !!

Jim Jordan appeared on the Lou Dobbs show last night to further discuss why the American public have lost complete faith and trust in the FBI and the systems of government which should be in place to stop and punish such blatantly unlawful action:

bleachbit-paul-combettableach-bit-2

Discovering Combetta’s July 24th, 2014 Reddit thread is significant because his commentary clearly shows an intention to modify the records of his “VIP client”, who we now know was Hillary Clinton.

Those records, as a consequence of their ownership by Secretary Clinton, are federal records. In essence, Paul Combetta, a private citizen, was seeking assistance on a public forum for how to modify federal records prior to export to an unknown entity (presumably Cheryl Mills).

As the weight of the discovery begins to shake out, and with more media beginning to understand the potential scope of the issue(s) inherent within the date of activity, on this thread we look at the timeline.

The absolute best researched timeline of the Hillary email scandal was done, and is being maintained, by Sharyl Atkinsson (see here). Using this timeline, along with information from congressional testimony, we can add the discoveries centering around Paul Combetta and provide a new perspective on the motives therein.

June 30, 2013: Hillary Clinton’s (long-term) technical assistant, Brian Pagliano’s server email accounts are transferred to the new Platte River Network Server where Paul Combetta is the Clinton custodian.

July 18, 2013: The Clintons sign formal deal with Platte River Network (PRN) for new email server services. [Platte River Network’s main office is in Denver CO; Paul Combetta works from a satellite office in Rhode Island, 145 miles away from Chappaqua, NY]

Early 2014: Monica Hanley (Hillary Clinton aide) says she finds Apple MacBook laptop from Spring of 2013 at her home and tries, but fails, to remotely transfer Hillary email archive to Platte River Network server.

Feb. 2014:

  • Hanley ships Apple MacBook laptop to unidentified person who transfers Hillary email archive to Gmail address, then to PRN server.
  • Hanley instructs unidentified person to delete and/or wipe Hillary email archive from Apple MacBook and Gmail.
  • Unidentified person ships Apple MacBook via US Postal Service or UPS to unidentified female Hillary associate who later tells FBI she never received it.
  • Nobody can find the Apple MacBook or thumb drive containing Hillary archive email.

May 8, 2014: House Benghazi select committee is established. Trey Gowdy is Chairman.

Summer of 2014: The State Dept. notifies Hillary aide/lawyer Cheryl Mills that it will be requesting Hillary’s work emails.

♦ July 22, 2014: Paul Combetta and wife Danielle Dirocco purchase a new home for $290,000 in Narragansett, Rhode Island. (Just an fyi – tax records/deeds)

July 23, 2014: Congressional Benghazi committee reaches agreement with State Dept. on production of records. Then, the very next day…

♦ July 24, 2014: Platte River Network Paul Combetta (aka “stonetear“) appears on Reddit with the following question(s):

FIRST: Hello all- I may be facing a very interesting situation where I need to strip out a VIP’s (VERY VIP) email address from a bunch of archived email that I have both in a live Exchange mailbox, as well as a PST file. Basically, they don’t want the VIP’s email address exposed to anyone, and want to be able to either strip out or replace the email address in the to/from fields in all of the emails we want to send out.

I am not sure if something like this is possible with PowerShell, or exporting all of the emails to MSG and doing find/replaces with a batch processing program of some sort.

Does anyone have experience with something like this, and/or suggestions on how this might be accomplished?

SECOND: As a PST file or exported MSG files, this could be done though, yes? The issue is that these emails involve the private email address of someone you’d recognize, and we’re trying to replace it with a placeholder address as to not expose it.

THIRD: I think maybe I wasn’t clear enough in the original post. I have these emails available in a PST file. Can I rewrite them in the PST? I could also export to MSG and do some sort of batch find/replace. Anyone know of tools that might help with this?

Later July 2014:

  • Clinton Aide/Attorney Cheryl Mills initiates review of any Hillary work emails with .gov addresses that were transferred from Pagliano server to Platte River Network server.
  • The emails don’t include the Jan-March 2009 emails lost on the missing Apple server.
  • The .gov work emails are put in a file on laptops of Cheryl Mills and Hillary attorney Heather Samuelson.
  • These laptop email files would later be wiped using BleachBit so they could never be recovered. The FBI was unable to review them.

August, 2014: State Dept. provides House Benghazi Committee with eight emails to or from Clinton that show her use of a private email account.

Sept. 15, 2014: Sharyl Attkisson reports on State Dept. official who said he witnessed Benghazi document sorting session with Hillary aides in State Dept. basement in 2013.

Late Sept. 2014:

  • Mills and Samuelson review the rest of the available Hillary emails, besides the .gov.
  • These email files would later be wiped using BleachBit so they could never be recovered. The FBI was unable to review them.
  • Selected emails are printed in Mills’ office and reviewed again by attorneys Samuelson, Mills and Hillary attorney David Kendall of Williams & Connolly.
  • “Non-work” emails are shredded.
  • “Work” emails were printed and provided on USB drive to Kendall.

♦ However, we can infer from the timeline segment above that Combetta was able to export the “clinton.com” email files by some method for Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson to sort, review and print – Between July 24, 2014 and late September 2014.

Now Watch Jim Jordan:

Dec. 2014: Hillary and Abedin begin using new email accounts on the domain hrcoffice.com.

Dec. 5, 2014: Hard copies of Hillary work emails are given to State Dept.

Dec. 2014: Hillary instructs her staff she no longer needs to keep the remaining “personal” emails.

Dec. 2014 or Jan. 2015:

  • Mills and Samuelson request unidentified person to delete the Hillary email files from their laptops.
  • Software called “BleachBit” is used so it can never be recovered.
  • Unknown Hillary staffer also wants Hillary email archive removed from PRN server.
  • Mills asks for shortened email retention for clintonemail.com account because Hillary decides she no longer needs emails older than 60 days.

July 10, 2015: FBI begins investigation Hillary email situation after U.S. Intelligence Community Inspector General refers the case of possible improper handling of classified information.

March 2, 2015:

  • NYT article exposes fact that Clinton used personal email account exclusively for state business.
  • PRN technicians conduct work on Pagliano server at Equinix datacenter.
  • Mills later tells FBI they were working on the server because she asked them to conduct an equipment inventory.

March 3, 2015: House Benghazi committee requests Hillary attorneys at Williams & Connolly to preserve and produce all documents and media related to her two clintonemail.com known addresses

March 4, 2015: House Benghazi committee privately subpoenas all Hillary emails related to Benghazi terrorist attacks. Clinton does not disclose the subpoenas but tweets, “I want the public to see my email. I asked State to release them. They said they will review them for release as soon as possible.”

March 9, 2015: Mills emails PRN and makes reference to the preservation request from Congress. A PRN technician would later tell FBI he doesn’t remember seeing it.

March 10, 2015: Clinton answers questions about her email practices for the first time. She tells reporters:

  • It was more convenient to use the private server.
  • “I wanted to use just one device for both personal and work emails instead of two.”
  • Last year, she deleted nearly 31,000+ emails that were “private.”
  • She will not turn over her personal email server.
  • She “fully complied” with the law.
  • She has turned over to the State Dept. 55,000 pages of work-related emails.
  • There were 62,320 emails in her account: 30,490 were public business; 31,830 were private.

March 25, 2015:

  • Platte River Network (PRN) has conference call with Bill Clinton’s staff.
  • Platte River Network technician later tells FBI that, at this point, he realized he’d forgotten to shorten Hillary’s email retention (that Mills requested in Dec. 2014), so he now deletes the Clinton archive mailbox from PRN and uses BleachBit to permanently delete files holding the emails.
  • FBI says one Platte River Network technician gave three conflicting stories but acknowledged that, when he made deletions, he knew of Congress’ preservation request and knew he should not delete Hillary’s email data on PRN server.
  • The FBI says somebody also manually deleted backups of the PRN server during this time frame. Clinton and Mills say they were unaware of these deletions.

March 31, 2015: There’s a conference call among Platte River Network, Kendall and Cheryl Mills. Later, Platte River Network would exert attorney-client privilege and refuse to comment on conversation. This means Hillary’s attorneys are representing the Platte River Network technician, too.

Now who do you think that Clinton-attorney-represented Platte River Network technician might be?

bleachbit-paul-combetta

Remember, prior to our discovery of the July 24th 2014 Reddit discussion, Mr. Combetta was comforted by an immunity agreement with the FBI.

If the FBI was aware of the Reddit information, then why would Combetta need to scrub it? Short answer, he wouldn’t.

You might also want to refresh your memory on the previous Clinton story and explanation from the FBI and Clinton lawyers regarding Paul Combetta:

“As the F.B.I.’s report notes,” Mr. Fallon said, “neither Hillary Clinton nor her attorneys had knowledge of the Platte River Network employee’s actions. It appears he acted on his own and against guidance given by both Clinton’s and Platte River’s attorneys to retain all data in compliance with a congressional preservation request.” (link)

Dr_Phil_teen_youtube_beating

(timeline continues)

trump eagle 10

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Election 2016, media bias, Notorious Liars, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Secretary of State, Stonetear investigation, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

521 Responses to Day #10 – FBI Director James Comey Admits “Stonetear” is Paul Combetta During Hearing….

  1. Rick8833991 says:

    Was Hillary selling access to her secret basement server? Was this all a CIA operation to pump out false information? Everything else is tall grass and weeds. People aren’t interested in Comey. He’s the well paid dammit doll. Congress should be interviewing Brennan and his NSA AND NI associates. Lou is correct about the DC toilet reference.

    Liked by 3 people

    • The keystone cops could figure this out… Comey playing deaf, dumb, stupid, & retarded is insulting to one’s intelligence. If the FBI is this inept they need to clean everyone out and start over. There was a coverup and Combetta is key, he talked to someone and then wanted to strip email addresses, the reason would be for a digital search to not turn up such emails. IF the addys were stripped when a search was run the emails would not be produced.

      Liked by 3 people

  2. Bendix says:

    I’m thinking now of another angle. Comey is all indignant over the criticism of the FBI not doing its job. I was thinking if he really believes that, there’s something wrong with him medically, but now I’m recalling that the FBI is not only under the Justice Department, it is under the larger Homeland Security. You cannot serve two masters. If Comey was acting to protect what he sees as vital issues of national security, then he would actually believe that criticism of him and his investigation is unfair, because we don’t know what investigation he was performing, or why, or under whose direction.
    Damn Bush and his stinking, unconstitutional Patriot Act.

    Liked by 4 people

  3. tommylotto says:

    Combetta was looking for a way to retroactively strip the PST file of evidence of Clinton’s email either so that it would not have to be produced, or that when produced it did not have all of the electronic breadcrumbs normally included in the PST file. He was having trouble finding a solution to his request on reddit, because those breadcrumbs are so difficult to get rid of in a PST file. He couldn’t do what “they” asked him to do. So, their solution was brutally corrupt and illegal, but effective. Remember, the PST file (breadcrumbs and all) was the federal record that they were required to preserve. Nevertheless, they printed out all the the emails (at least the ones they were willing to produce). The printouts obviously did not have all of the digital headers and electronic breadcrumbs embedded in the PST file. The printout just showed the text of the messages. They produce the paper printouts and bleachbit the PST file into oblivion. The electronic breadcrumbs (a necessary part of the federal record) was knowingly and willingly destroyed. Even on the record as admitted by all, we have the intentional destruction of federal records and a felony.

    Liked by 4 people

  4. Thurstan says:

    If only Comey could find the aperture-flywheel-gramus with the vacuum gasket.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. When Trump becomes POTUS, he needs to get the new AG, Rudy Gulinani to bring criminal charges against The Clinton Foundation and apply the RICO statute to seize the assets.

    Liked by 3 people

  6. Christine says:

    Can this be a Pre-Arranged Plan not to file charges?
    If the Justice Department did not give immunity and decided to file criminal charges against Paul Combetta, he would been a witness against Cheryl Mills….therefore satisfying Comey’s direct intent…even though the law states Gross Negligence is all that is needed…which is easily proven for this case. Maybe the Justice Department gave both Paul and Cheryl immunity because they knew it would take away intent?….than tell the American People they can’t prove intent…
    Even though circumstantial evidence is how intent is proven…and destroying of documents etc. is how you prove intent….and intent could have been easily proven in this case. All intent cases are proven by circumstantial evidence.
    Comey tried to say know-one has ever been prosecuted for the Gross Negligence…which there has been several in the Military who has been prosecuted.
    Comey is trying to say those cases were different…which is incorrect….the facts do not have to be exact…because no two cases are…they just have to fall under the umbrella of the Gross Negligence Criminal Code.
    Maybe Comey or the Justice Department never thought that we would compare the Hillary Gross Negligence with the other Military Personal who was convicted.

    Liked by 1 person

    • William F BUCKLEY Ghost says:

      A condition of any immunity agreement is complete honesty and the immunity only extends to what the witness says. The more he or she talks the more immunity they earn. However, everything is predicted on telling the truth! 😉

      Liked by 2 people

  7. Rob says:

    Who says they have not left already and most likely everyone involved has already planned their exit.

    Like

  8. ilovevictoriasbows says:

    Director Comey is in over his head.

    Liked by 2 people

  9. Sayit2016 says:

    Good Lord– at what point will Comfy care more about the sanctity of the Law than protecting this corrupt and evil woman, who by her own actions should never see the inside of the WH again ?? This cat and mouse BS is enough to make a saint swear !!!!!!!!! Indict her already and her whole RICO crew. Enough already!!!!!!

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Howie says:

    Obama is going to Wag the Dog, Bigly. Duck and cover.

    Liked by 3 people

  11. JohnPaulJohnes says:

    It is evidently clear that Comey no longer works for The United States, he is now a servant to Hillary only.

    The FBI can no longer be trusted. When Trump replaces Comey the FBI will still be tarnished and no longer thought of as a legitimate agency.

    Liked by 2 people

  12. jakeandcrew says:

    “EXCLUSIVE: FBI Used Agents As Pawns To Insulate Hillary, Aides & Clinton Foundation From Prosecutions”

    The FBI case agents and support personnel are forbidden to “go public” or comment on the record to share their frustrations and dismay because they each signed an unprecedented confidentiality agreement prior to signing onto work the Clinton investigation. Violating that agreement would likely cost them their careers and pensions. Regardless, True Pundit conducted interviews with FBI assets and support personnel who collectively painted a dark insiders’ portrait of the Clinton criminal probe which was commissioned to determine how Clinton and her aides handled, maintained, stored and ultimately botched some of the most sensitive information ever breached in the country’s 240-year history. True Pundit’s interviews and intelligence gathering on the Clinton investigation found:

    Allegations of pay-for-play involving the Clinton Foundation were not properly vetted, ultimately white washed
    FBI agents were blocked from serving search warrants to retrieve key evidence
    Attempts to secure Clinton’s medical records to confirm her head injury were sabotaged by FBI Director James Comey
    FBI agents were not allowed to interrogate witnesses and targets without warning
    Clinton and aides were provided special VIP accommodations during interviews
    FBI suspended standard investigative tactics employed in other probes
    FBI agents efforts were often blocked, suppressed by FBI, DOJ brass
    Agents lost faith that their superiors and DOJ wanted to see the case reach a grand jury

    http://truepundit.com/exclusive-fbi-used-agents-as-pawns-to-insulate-hillary-aides-clinton-foundation-from-prosecutions/

    Like

    • ALEX says:

      Considering they allowed Cheryl Mills who was given immunity to represent Hillary and sit in at the FBI questioning is all I need to know about this sham…

      Liked by 4 people

    • Howie says:

      It appears all lawyers, as officers of the court, are bound to vote against the crook.

      Like

    • oldiadguy says:

      jakeandcrew

      As I have posted several times, we should always vet the material that is in these articles. So lets vet this article.

      According to truepundits archives, the site has only been posting stories since June of 2016. So the site has only been around four months. Not a good sign.

      The article was written by “admin.” So we can’t check and see if the author is credible or not. Another bad sign.

      The way the article is written and the use of the term FBI Insider reminds me of the string of articles on the now defunct Ulsterman Report where the author claimed to have a number of Insiders. His Whitehouse Insider gave details into the Obama Whitehouse. I believe Ulsterman also had a Wall Street Insider and a Pentagon Insider. It is my understanding that the Ulsterman Report disappeared as all of these “insiders” were fraudulent. This is why I would like to know who the author was.

      Lets look at the claims made in the article. We know that the Inspector General referral to the DOJ occurred sometime during July of 2015. At some point after the initial referral, the FBI was assigned to investigate the matter. Since this investigation involved National Security matters, it would most likely have been a closed investigation.

      However, the truepundit article claims the Clinton Email scandal investigation started in a different manner.

      “John Giacalone was the supervisor of the bureau’s National Security Branch and also the FBI brains and genesis behind the Clinton email and private server investigation. He first approached Comey in 2015 for the green light to probe how the former secretary of state operated her private email server and handled classified correspondences. Rumors had been swirling in intelligence circles. Once approved, Giacalone spearheaded the investigation, and helped hand select top agents who were highly skilled but also discreet. Many of those agents were concerned when Giacalone abruptly resigned in the middle of the investigation.”

      Who is accurate, the media, Congress and Comey who have described how the investigation came to be or a new and unvetted website. Then there is this gem.

      “Moreover, once agents had access to the completed 302 report detailing what precisely went down during the Clinton interview, agents thought it might be missing pages or portions because it failed to contain key ingredients.”

      This was a National Security investigation. Remember how some of the agents had to have their security clearances increased so the could read the Emails the Bureau had recovered. Also, 302’s are just not laying around. Any agent trying to access a computer copy of the 302 would have cause an immediate alert. When I was doing public corruption investigations with the Bureau, our 302’s had the similiar protection. When someone tried to access one of our 302’s we were notified. So there is no way any rank and file agents could have gotten their hands on the Clinton interview 302. That story is just not credible.

      Then there was all the FBI tough guy Hollywood stuff. Based on my working with FBI agents I find some of these claims almost laughable.

      Think about this, why would any FBI agent risk termination, loss of pension and possible prosecution by obtaining Hillary’s medical records in an illegal manner and then what. Provide the information to a website that has been online for four months? It doesn’t make sense to take that kind of risk.

      I could go on and point out more problems with this article, but I just don’t have the time. Without evidence, I would have to say that this article is a work of fiction with a few facts and names thrown in to make it look believable. This just my opinion.

      Here is a story from back in March 2016 that may bring some light to Comey’s intentions.

      Take care

      Like

      • jakeandcrew says:

        Thank you, oldiadguy. I was hoping you’d respond to this. When anonymous sources are quoted, how do you know whether it’s legit or not? I appreciate your LE insight.

        I didn’t see a link to the article you mentioned – I’d like to read it.

        I tried to find info on True Pundit before I posted this, and found not much at all. It’s not listed anywhere as an unreliable source, but also no endorsements, either. Maybe it’s just too new.

        Like

        • oldiadguy says:

          As far as recognizing bogus anonymous sources, a lot of it is judgment based on past experience. In the case of the article from truepundit, two issues jumped out at me.

          The first was how it was written and the fact the author was using FBI Insider type structure. My mind immediately went back to the old Ulsterman Reports and the various Insiders he supposedly had. Those articles were believable as they spun known facts together with pure fiction.

          The author was actually very good and would have made a good screen writer for Hollywood. I don’t know how it was discovered that the Insiders were fraudulent, I just know that one day Ulsterman Report was gone and there were numerous conversation on a number of sites as to the reason it had been removed by the site owner.

          The second issue was the FBI issues. Most folks have been conditioned by Hollywood and various sites to think of the FBI in a certain manner. Having been in law enforcement for decades and having the privilege of having worked investigations with the local FBI office for some years, I had a better understanding on how things actually work. I cited two examples in my prior comment, but there were many more.

          Remember the part of the article that the FBI should have hit all of the parties involved at the same time and then tossed their residences while two agents would pepper the targets with questions in front of their families. That was laughable for many reasons.

          In my own experience, I have found that FBI agents are very respectful of citizens property even those whom they believe are good for criminal acts. In one case the agent tidied up a workstation after he had made of copy of a computer hard drive. The funny thing is this was an authorized covert search of a hard drive and the agent made the messy workstation look like they guy’s mother came in and cleaned up after him. So much for being covert and all.

          Remember the photos of the terror suspects homes that the press entered after the FBI had completed their search? Did either of those residences looked like they were “tossed?”

          Also consider that the targets of this investigation were not run of the mill drug dealers or home grown terrorist, but parties of one of the most powerful political organizations in the country. The targets are well educated for the most part, they know their rights and are lawyered up with some of the best lawyers money can buy.

          So all this so called FBI bravado was nonsense. The only way I can think of any FBI agent making these kinds of statements is if they were old retired agents bragging about how they would have done it back in the day, while drinking copious amounts of adult beverages.

          Another thing to consider is that the FBI is one of the most regulation bound agencies in the country. Many of these regulations about how they conduct an investigation has been imposed on them by Congress and Comey mentioned that in one of his statements.

          As far as truepundit, I won’t call it a disinformation site because of one article, but I would say it is sketchy because of one and the other issues I noted. As always, we need to vet the material we post here at the CTH. The CTH was at one time one of the best crowd sourcing investigative sites on the web, not so much today. We need to return to the basics and continue to search for the truth.

          I’m sorry about the link, it didn’t post and I failed to check my comment. Here is the link.

          http://time.com/4277521/the-g-man-the-emails-and-hillary/?iid=sr-link5

          The Time article shows Comey having run ins with the Clintons in the past and while he couldn’t charge them, he did rake them over the coals. Sort of like he is now by releasing all of this negative information.

          It has been nice discussing this information in a civil and friendly manner.

          As always, Take Care

          Liked by 1 person

  13. Pingback: Comey Admits Clinton Aides Had Classified Information on Laptops, Still Received Immunity (UPDATED) | The Foxhole

  14. Howie says:

    Crabby Comey….rotten to the core.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Howie says:

    The FBI’s Hillary email probe is looking even more like a coverup
    It’s bad enough that FBI Director James Comey agreed to pass out immunity deals like candy to material witnesses and potential targets of his investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s illegal private email server.

    But now we learn that some of them were immunized despite lying to Comey’s investigators.
    http://nypost.com/2016/09/28/the-fbis-hillary-email-probe-is-looking-even-more-like-a-coverup/

    Liked by 2 people

    • sDee says:

      Most folks understand immunity. It is retroactive – given in return for honest testimony needed to put criminals higher up in jail.

      Yet now…our regime grants prospective immunity for the perjured testimony needed to keep criminals higher up out of jail!!!

      Our government is a complete and brazen criminal cabal.

      Liked by 3 people

      • darcy says:

        Does it seem to you — as it does to me — that both Comey and Lynch are guilty of obstruction of justice?
        Two of our highest-ranking officials tasked with prosecuting crimes are themselves serving the interests of the criminal Clinton (Soros) cartel and perpetrating treason against the Constitution which they’ve both sworn to uphold?

        What does a law-abiding populace do with such traitors?
        And what of the Congress which aids and abets this lawless regime?
        In this postmodern world, there are no righteous and honorable standards — only power; no truth, no law — only the sword.
        Heaven help them when the sword alone will stop their craven corruption and their contempt for the oath of office they’ve sworn to uphold.

        Like

  16. sDee says:

    “I’m fighting, all of us across the nation are fighting, for peaceful regime change in our own country” — Donald J Trump, August 16, 2016

    Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness

    Liked by 3 people

  17. andi lee says:

    Okay, wow! The House is in recess until November. The Senate will be meeting every 3 days to block Obama’s recess appointments, mainly that Dem Judge Garland. Obama and 19 select Dems have flown off to Isreal for Peres funeral.

    Like

    • bofh says:

      So… it’s “goodbye” to the internet then, eh? Senate not going to say “boo” about it…

      Liked by 1 person

      • M. Mueller says:

        In Wisconsin. I have called, twice, and let Senator Johnson know I, and my family, will not vote for ANYONE who does not do all possible to stop the ICANN transfer or stop TPP.

        Feingold is running against him; he is a totally liberal @ss. I won’t vote for Feingold, but I refuse to vote for Johnson. How is it better to have a Republican schmuck over a Democrat schmuck? What a usless bunch of humanity! I will just not vote in that senate race.

        Like

  18. Political Reviewer says:

    BlindSquirrel (@StanHjerleid) says:
    September 29, 2016 at 2:59 pm
    “Great post farmhand. I’d only take issue with one thing (I know what. you mean) “face the fact that nobody will be accountable for this” – In this lifetime maybe, but there is a final judgement coming. They will answer for this.”

    If I may take some of everyone’s time, please allow me to share a true, personal story with my fellow Treepers.

    When I was a mere child of 2 – 3 years, my father and step-mother lived with my grandmother and myself. While my grandmother and father were away at work each day, my step-mother was given charge over my well being. She would frequently abuse me in some horrendous ways…too many of which to list here. However, one I will share with you is that she would kick me down the basement stairs, turn out the lights, and close the door behind me. As you can well imagine, not only was I physically harmed but also terrified to be left alone in a dark and scary basement.

    Advancing the time frame to when I was in my late twenties, I received word that my step-mother had died a very prolonged and painful death. (At this point in time she and my father lived in their own home with their three children, and I had no contact with them for many, many years.)

    What was the cause of her death? One day, while she was home alone, she slipped and fell down the basement stairs, striking her head on the cinder block walls. She was immediately rendered unconscious and bleeding and stayed at the bottom of the steps until my father came home from work approximately six hours later. My step-mother was taken to the hospital by ambulance but never regained consciousness, dying a few days afterwards.

    Approximately 15 years after her death when I became a born-again Christian, the Lord showed me something so profound that I’ve never forgotten it and it was this: God was there when I was abused and kicked down the basement stairs with the door closed behind me. He was there when I…a small, helpless child… wept in fear in that dark, dank basement. And just as BlindSquirrel wrote, there was a judgment coming for my step-mother when she lost her own life because she fell down her own basement stairs.

    Please don’t misunderstand me. I take no joy in what happened to my step-mother. I can only imagine her fear and pain as she fell down the stairs. It was on that day that her final judgment drew nigh.

    I am sharing this story for those who are wondering, “When will justice prevail for the Clintons and their many, many fellow evil-doers?”

    Justice is coming my friends, but it will be in God’s time and in His way, for His purposes. The Clintons and their ilk may think and perhaps even rejoice that they’ve pulled off their evil deeds. They may even be laughing at us “Deplorables” behind closed doors. But God knows everything they’ve done, every lie they’ve told, every person they’ve harmed, and He forgets nothing.

    Yes, I would like to see them all punished. If I had my way, their punishment would begin now, this very second. However, as a Christian I must trust in God’s knowledge and timing. As Scripture tells me, “Be still and know that I am God.” (Psalm 46:10)

    Thank you for taking time to read my story. I hope that in some small way it will help you find encouragement and peace in your hearts and minds.

    God bless you all.

    With heartfelt thanks to Sundance and my fellow Treepers for welcoming me into your midst,
    Political Reviewer

    Liked by 5 people

    • sDee says:

      Thank you for sharing your story – I admire your inner strength and self reliance.

      No way Clinton wanted to run for President – it is the devil’s due.

      I see that the Clintons, Soros and so many more like them have sold their souls and are already living an inner torment. They are old and likely have hundreds of millions, even billions, so why continue with the devil’s work?

      Liked by 1 person

    • Ruffin says:

      Thank you for sharing your story, happy you found your safe harbor with us Treepers, Welcome home.
      Child abusers are at the top of God’s final judgment list, “Suffer little children, come unto me” is his promise to children who have suffered from abuse.

      All of us have to have total trust in God and his time table-we are not in charge, remember “I am the way, the truth and the light. We are going to have light on November 8th, 2016.
      Continue to pray and know in your heart that we are on God’s path and he will take care of us all.

      Liked by 1 person

    • MaineCoon says:

      Thank you for sharing as it is an encouragement to me. This Comey testimony & story culminated in the full measure of corruption even though we don’t know the full story. It’s brought us face to face with the pure evil in our top government officials and permeation of corruption from the top down. As your story shows God is sovereign, in control and revenge truly is HIs. As I posted earlier, I do believe we might see some of the hell HRC might endure on earth through physical deteriation, the real hell to be endured is eternal separation from God after dying. After an intensive 9-month Bible study on Revelation last year, I do not wish that on any person, but some by their choice will be in an eternal hell. Your post encourages me during this difficult time in our country. May God protect Mr. Trump and old his loved ones and may he look to God for wisdom and guidance.

      Liked by 2 people

      • MaineCoon says:

        Prov 24: 19 Do not fret because of evildoers
        Or be envious of the wicked;
        20 For there will be no [a]future for the evil man;
        The lamp of the wicked will be put out.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Yes Sundance has provided a lot of us a welcome tree branch. The education I’ve received from Sundance and fellow Treepers over the last year is almost overwhelming at times.

      And Political Reviewer, your story reinforced the above statement. Thanks for sharing and you are in my prayers.

      As I said in that post, if Comey has any semblance of a conscience, he has already begun reaping the rewards of his capitulation. It will be eating at him 24/7. Money may be one thing, but the inner shame he will be living with will be his Hell on earth.

      Like

  19. Smoking Lizard says:

    I read the FBI report but I can’t remember if it specified. Someone please clear these questions up for me, if possible:

    Did Platte River provide the FBI electronically? As a PST?
    Or did they only had over the emails printed out?
    If Platte River provided the FBI a PST, what purpose did it serve to attempt to replace/remove HRC’s email address from any of the messages?
    If Platte River provided just hard copies, the same question applies. Why replace/remove? No need.

    I just can’t figure out why Combetta wanted to do it. What was the motivation? Bugging me.

    Like

    • Sandra-VA says:

      Presumably, the motivation was to remove H’s email address from the emails such that they would not be responsive to the request for documents/emails by the Benghazi Committee.

      Watch the video that Sundance included in the opening post above. It outlines the issue.

      Like

      • Smoking Lizard says:

        Presumably, the motivation was to remove H’s email address from the emails such that they would not be responsive to the request for documents/emails by the Benghazi Committee.

        Why not just delete the messages?

        The email would still be in her Exchange mailbox even if her email address was changed. You understand what I’m saying?

        Like

      • what if the Very VIP was Obama instead of Hillary when Mills contacted Combetta to bleach emails and scrub the addresses. Isn’t he the ultimate being protected here?

        Like

        • Smoking Lizard says:

          what if the Very VIP was Obama instead of Hillary when Mills contacted Combetta to bleach emails and scrub the addresses. Isn’t he the ultimate being protected here?

          Possible. But Comey has already stated that the VIP was Clinton.

          Like

  20. Smoking Lizard says:

    Sorry…many typos in the previous post. Let me try again.

    I read the FBI report but I can’t remember if it specified the answers to these questions. Someone please clear these questions up for me, if possible:

    Did Platte River provide the emails to the FBI electronically? As a PST?

    Or did they only hand over the emails printed out?

    If Platte River provided the FBI a PST, what purpose did it serve to attempt to replace/remove HRC’s email address from any of the messages?

    If Platte River provided just hard copies, the same question applies. Why replace/remove? There’d be no need.

    I just can’t figure out why Combetta wanted to do it. What was the motivation? It’s bugging me.

    Like

    • could it have been Obama’s email address they were trying to eliminate?

      Liked by 1 person

    • nyetneetot says:

      We are missing specific information as to why one way was decided vs. another.
      The stated premise was to obfuscate Hillary’s personal E-Mail address from the messages held in Platte River custody at the time. The address was in use and it was desired to continue using it. Much the same way an unlisted phone number is kept from general public knowledge for the same reasons.

      After watching the video, I think I understand that the FBI director is not going out of his way to clear up any misunderstanding on the part of the people holding the inquiry.
      His responses are very flip. When asked who the “they” is, he took the specific phrasing as a hypothetical and responded first with “I don’t know”, then with “yeah, sure, it was most likely…”
      Also, I keep forgetting to bring this up, but BleachBit may not do exactly what people are thinking/assuming it does. At least from a technical perspective. Data on spinning disk may very well be recoverable.

      Liked by 1 person

  21. Sandra-VA says:

    see my reply to your original post.

    Like

  22. I really hope Donald Trump hammers Hillary with these issues during the next debate. I want him to knock her out with these issues. They are paramount with the American voters.

    Like

  23. nomobama says:

    I hope that this email situation takes Clinton, Comey, and Mills down. Jail time for Clinton, Mills, and some others is necessary.

    Like

  24. sysconfig says:

    Unidentified person ships Apple MacBook via US Postal Service or UPS to unidentified female Hillary associate who later tells FBI she never received it.
    Nobody can find the 1500 dollar Apple MacBook or thumb drive containing Hillary archive email.

    what they didnt have tracking numbers, declared value, ins. ticket, registered mail , reimbursement for a missing item in 2014?..? and it was USPS…we have just his word that occurred? He just let it go?

    Liked by 2 people

  25. Smoking Lizard says:

    The stated premise was to obfuscate Hillary’s personal E-Mail address from the messages held in Platte River custody at the time. The address was in use and it was desired to continue using it.

    This is very possible what they were doing. And if so, that’s not at all nefarious. We may be making a mountain out of a molehill.

    And Beachbit is primarily a disk space reclamation tool. These tools reclame space by moving data from one disk sector to another, making what was originally in the sector unrecoverable. So its use may have been innocent, too.

    Like

    • LBB says:

      The two points I get out of this whole ordeal.

      Clinton & staff may have exposed government business to many by using non-approved set-up here and abroad via their equipment & users hardware and habits.

      They should of never destroyed the master archived file. This one I have hopes of some Hero having those files because of the first one.

      Like

  26. Paco Loco says:

    This is what a “soft coup d’etat” looks like. Justice, the FBI, State and Homeland Security all being led by corrupted officials who if Hillary says jump, they all say, how high. 8 years of the most corrupt and anti American regime in US history. This gang of thugs will do everything in their power to stop a Trump Presidency. They know that the inditements will fly and the heads will roll when Trump turns the DoJ over to Rudi. We have to stop the vote fraud that they will use for Hillary to win. It’s now them or us…the last chance to save the USA!

    Like

  27. sulli159 says:

    “There was a crooked man,” Related Poem Content Details
    BY MOTHER GOOSE
    There was a crooked man, and he walked a crooked mile,
    He found a crooked sixpence against a crooked stile;
    He bought a crooked cat which caught a crooked mouse,
    And they all lived together in a little crooked house.

    Nuff said

    Like

  28. andi lee says:

    Critical Reminder of: 19 Sept 2016 Hearing, questioning of FBI Director James Comey by Rep Will Hurd (Tx)(formerly undercover CIA, Intel community) and others.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s