Yes, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama Did Create The Rise of ISIS – It Is an Indisputable Fact…

In February of 2016 the U.S. State Department released more of Hillary Clinton’s emails. One of those emails originated on March 22nd 2011, the exact day President Obama launched the attacks on Libya.

power-rice-rodham-clinton-2

The released email confirms what many already knew – it was Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice and Samantha Power who convinced President Obama to go to war in Libya:

“Turning POTUS around on this is a major win for everything we worked for”..

hillary email 4

In 2015 we noted an article at Real Clear Politics which hit on one of the key aspects of the Benghazi fiasco media have been hell-bent on hiding; Hillary Clinton, not President Obama, is actually the person responsible for the crisis in Libya.

When we watched the House Select Committee on Benghazi hearings, it was interesting to note how no-one really went ‘there‘ to give Clinton full ownership of the 2011 Libyan Intervention; ownership she deserves. So let’s review Clinton’s ownership.

Sarkosy with Clinton - whatz weeth you americanz nowIt’s as if both congress and the media have forgotten those ridiculous 19-days in 2011 when Hillary was flying back-and-forth to meet with French Prime-Minister Sarkozy and plan their endeavors.

In the U.S. presidential adviser Samantha Power was bending Obama’s ear with declarations of a “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P) the Eastern Libyan citizens from the boogie man narrative assigned to Gadaffi.

Meanwhile in New York, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice was answering calls from her British and French counterparts who were similarly selling an interventionist message.

Back in the White House, President Obama was reluctant to engage. It was Secretary Clinton working overtime to bring the President into the same line of thinking as herself.

In a moment of rare bi-partisanship many Democrats and Republicans were aligned with the White House in not wanting to intervene in Libya. Of course, there was John McCain and Lindsey Graham who joined with Team Clinton to bomb yet another nation into civil war. But too his initial credit, Obama was reluctant.

February 2011 France’s Sarkozy almost immediately began calling for the ouster of Kaddaffi and requesting Western nations to get involved to insure Kaddaffi fell. Sarkozy was quite passionate about it – which struck many observers as odd because he was ‘so far out’ ahead of any nation on this position.

However, unlike Egypt, as the fighting intensified in February 2011 President Obama was curiously silent around Libya.

This initial non-reaction was played by the adoring U.S. media as Obama being calm under pressure. However, this calm was beset by the reality of what was actually reported to be taking place on the ground in Libya. The word “slaughter” was in almost every article.

Meanwhile President Obama seemed unfazed, and strangely quiet. So much so that Sarkozy was demanding President Obama say something, anything. This U.S. silence went on for over two full weeks until eventually the media headlines began to question the Obama strategy, or, well actually, the lack thereof.

This culminated in a weekend around February 24, 25 and 26th, 2011, when headlines began to read that Kaddaffi “strafes” while Obama “golfs”. and astoundingly enough the Libyan Ambassador to the U.S. went on national television and begged for Obama to do something, ANYTHING.

Then a seemingly innocuous event transpired which actually summarized the lack of U.S. leadership quite well. This became the origin of the “leading from behind” sentiment.

It is important to understand that under President Obama the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations is actually a cabinet level position.

In 2011 Ambassador Susan Rice and Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, were essentially equal peers.

Ambassador Rice representing Obama to the U.N. in New York, and Secretary Clinton representing Obama to nations while “on-the-road” so to speak. Under the leadership structure of Obama’s cabinet both held equal and equivocal rank.

During that critical February weekend when the world was desperately demanding some form of action around the civil war in Libya, Sarkozy was having visible fits on EU television and trying to put together a European coalition.

In direct response to Sarkozy’s pleas the U.N. announced an emergency Security Council meeting of the six prominent nations to determine what, if any, action could be taken to stop what was described as the “pending slaughter in Libya”.

However, instead of attending that emergency U.N. Security Council meeting February 25th, 2011, Ambassador Rice went to South Africa to attend a global warming summit where they were discussing the danger of bovine flatulence (cow farts) as it relates to harming the environment.

Back in Washington DC the optics were even worse.

After ignoring cries for opinion, let alone involvement, and with Ambassador Rice blowing off the U.N. Security council meeting, and against the backdrop of media beginning to sense a detached president more interested in golf than Libya, the whole optical mess exploded.

Because on that very night when the U.N. Security Council met, a detached President Obama and his wife Michelle held a Motown Review Concert in the East Room of the White House.

Talk about a bad optic – You can’t make this stuff up !!

By itself the White House Motown Review Party seemed a bit detached, but against the backdrop of Hillary proclaiming hundreds of women and children are being strafed in the streets, the optic was horrendous.

The contrast was so bold, and so stark, and happened so fast, and was seen by Europe and the United Nations as, well, unfathomable. The proverbial water-carrying media couldn’t ignore it if they wanted to.

Recognizing what was unfolding a rapid White House team scrambled with a crisis response…..

Obama - One Flew Over the Cuckoo's NestAgainst two weeks of silence in February 2011, and a fawning U.S. media beginning to doubt their own beliefs in the administration, the White House begins damage control for their earlier detachment.

When Susan Rice skipped a Feb 25, 2011 emergency weekend U.N. Security Council meeting, the Obama administration was compromised in their ability to influence any real outcome in Libya.

Without the U.S. seated at the policy table the U.N. made two strategic resolutions/decisions which were brutally short-sighted.

The first mistake was a resolution banning the sale or transfer of arms or weaponry into Libya during the civil war. On it’s face the ban might sound like a generally good idea; however, in reality it was exceptionally self-defeating. After all, it banned all weapons from entering Libya, including weapons for the opposition – which most thought would be needed for the “rebels” to defend themselves.

The second mistake was criminal charges brought about by the ICC (International Criminal Court) against the Kaddaffi regime. Nothing tells a dictator to double down on his position like telling him you as soon as this is over we will lock you and your family up for life.

Essentially those charges filed by the ICC solidified the certainty that Kaddaffi would never compromise. He was forced into a singular position – either he would win the civil war, or he would die trying. Losing the war would mean death or a life in prison – one of these was now certain. What did Kaddaffi have to lose by fighting?

This Security Council resolution highlights the emotional short-sighted outcome of most U.N. determinations. However, historically the U.S. has tempered logic to the 6 nation table of stupidity. But not this time. This time, at the specific direction of President Obama and his policy team, the U.S. did not even participate.

Obama and Hillary - The French Foreign LegionHowever, while the White House may have been annoyingly quiet, Hillary Clinton certainly was not.

This lack of synergy led to multiple instances where Clinton’s publicly voiced opinion ran exactly opposite to the Obama administration’s position she was supposedly representing.

The international optic was a completely out of sync with the White House and State Department.

Sometimes embarrassingly so.

The U.S. government came under fire today for chartering a rescue boat for Americans stuck in Libya that is too small to cope with the rough Mediterranean sea.

Hundreds of American citizens were finally set to depart Tripoli harbour aboard the Maria Dolores, a small passenger ferry chartered by the U.S., trapped there by rough seas.

At the same time larger Greek and Turkish vessels have transported thousands of their own citizens to safety, crossing the choppy water to mainland Europe. (link)

The State Department was struggling with multiple plates spinning simultaneously.

Secretary Clinton was noticeably unprepared to handle the heavy lifting and President Obama was not in the mood to initially bail her out. From the botched messaging, to the failure to evacuate American citizens from Western Libya, we watched as it almost seemed President Obama was enjoying Hillary being overwhelmed.

While Hillary had been trying to fill the February 2011 void left by Obama’s silence, another key player was working policy structure behind the scenes.

One of Obama’s little known advisors named Samantha Power began to play a more important role.

Power is the wife of Regulatory Czar Cass Sunstein, in 2011 she was a foreign policy advisor to President Obama along with Denis McDonough and Tom Donilon.

Samantha Power Leaving White House West WingHowever, Power increasingly held a sway when it came to Libya, and her influence was soon noted with the introduction of the “Responsibility to Protect” Doctrine, or as it became known R2P.

Essentially her approach was to frame the possibility of defeat upon the Libyan Rebels in a similar venue as the historical Rwanda genocide. The potential slaughter of the Libyan Benghazi uprising was framed around a need for Humanitarian Intervention.

Despite the U.N Security Council resolution banning weapon distribution into Libya, the broad outline of a reason for U.S. intervention became visible. NATO would arm the rebellion and NATO would take action to “protect” the Benghazi rebels as Kaddaffi’s army moved ever closer to their weakly held positions.

Samantha Power – Susan Rice – President Obama – May 2011 during the decision to arm the Libyan “rebels”.

However, there was one big problem – WE HAD NO IDEA WHO THE REBELS WERE. The administration had no idea what the ideology behind the Benghazi Rebels actually was.

Some analysts believe the administration actually did know, but chose not to recognize the rebels’ affiliation with al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood and armed them anyway.

Others, namely CNN analysts, said there was no real way to identify the ideology and we were just going to have to take a chance on them.

Personally I think there is profoundly enough visible evidence to state the administration ‘had to know’. Why?

Because there were hundreds of on-the-ground reports from the region which accurately identified individually very specific people within the rebels as radical islamists. There is no intellectually honest way to believe the administration did not know they were supporting al-Qaeda affiliates and the Muslim Brotherhood. The signs were just too obvious.

Mustafa Abdel-Jalil (Picture taken Feb. 27th) Leader of Benghazi Opposition Council

Mustafa Abdel-Jalil (Picture taken Feb. 27th, 2011) Leader of Benghazi Opposition Council

One of the first signs was the very first Kaddaffi politician who defected from the regime and joined the rebellion. Interior Justice Minister, Mustafa Abdel Jalil.

Within 48 hours of Justice Abdel Jalil surfacing as the first defector, and becoming the defacto leader of the rebels, it was easily identifiable his ideology was for a sharia compliant Libya.

But the reality of the “rebels” being al-Qaeda affiliated made things complex. In essence the CIA and DoD knew if Kaddaffi fell the most likely scenario would be a rise of Islamic extremism.

Mustafa-Abdel-Jalil-POTUS

The compounding problem was the massive stockpiles of weapons that were at stake in the equation.

If Kaddaffi fell, decades of weapons built up in hundreds of warehouses were going to be up for grabs. Weapons that included surface-to-air missiles, MANPADS, shoulder fired stinger missiles and tons of mustard gas and WMD.

Kaddaffi had built up massive amounts of arms over a period of three decades as the worlds most notorious international terrorist.

Very soon those weapons and missiles would go missing; and it was the retrieval of those missiles that led to a joint State Dept./CIA operation putting Ambassador Chris Stevens in Benghazi, Eastern Libya where he was assassinated in September the following year….

So, yeah – she owns this:

Hillary - orange is the new black

There was a relatively ignored article in the U.K. Telegraph in 2012 which specifically looked at the rise of al-Qaeda in Syria, which evolved into ISIS.

The actual fighters were interviewed and spoke in their own words about how the Western media didn’t understand that ISIS was fully in control.  It’s an important article to read to gain a full understanding of who was doing what in Syria in 2011/2012:

isis in syria

(Link To Full Story)

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Government, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Egypt & Libya Part 2, Election 2016, Iran, Iraq, ISIS, Islam, Jihad, Secretary of State, Susan Rice, Syria, Terrorist Attacks, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

270 Responses to Yes, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama Did Create The Rise of ISIS – It Is an Indisputable Fact…

  1. Betty says:

    I could never understand why Susan Rice made that Sunday talk show circuit to insult us with her outright lies. I thought she was just a low functioning tool for Obama. But now the truth seems to be that she was in on the plotting up to her elbows (she must have forgot she is a low functioning tool), Just imagine, before 4 Americans were brutally murdered of-course, how high they must have been on themselves.

    R2P didn’t mean a damn thing to those three, beyond manipulating Obama, that is – they knew how Obama loves shiny things, would love the idea of people seeing him as having a responsibility to protect – And as is typical of Obama his commitment was no deeper then the sound bite on the evening news.

    So instead of Susan Rice being the useful idiot I gave her credit for she was dancing her heart out covering her own ass that Sunday morning – and Hillary’s and Samantha Power’s and Sid Bluminthal’s and every one else who invested in their ‘Get Us Rich Quick Sovereignty Change Scheme”. And add the rape of the people of Lybia to the rape of the people of Haiti.

    Liked by 23 people

    • flounder, rebel, vulgarian says:

      Excellent addendum.

      Liked by 1 person

      • …agree … and I agree with Trump when he says we are being
        led by a bunch of DUMMIES. November 8th can’t come soon enough.

        Look what Hillary’s “BAD JUDGEMENT” has brought to our
        southern border/ time to LOCK/LOAD!

        http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/isis-terrorist-tells-feds-jihadist-brothers-mexico/

        “Khabir actually bragged to an Italian newspaper last week that the
        border region is so open that he could get in with a handful of men
        and kill thousands of people in Texas and Arizona in the space of
        a few hours.”

        Liked by 3 people

        • oldmossback says:

          He may kill some of us by surprise, but most South Texans are armed to the hilt currently, due to the cartels…..and the rest of Texas would be down there in a very few hours……disorder and confusion would be to their initial advantage; death would be their final reward. I for one would not take prisoners.

          Like

    • Bull Durham says:

      Both rapes dwarfed by the rape they arranged in Syria. If that is a civil war, we are all living on Mars. It was a Maidan before Maidan in Kiev. An armed uprising in Homs that the US arranged for years until it broke out in total was, then called civil war for years when it was a proxy army of jihadis used against the democratically elected government of Syria.

      They have fed holy hell to Syria AQ, ISIS, chemical weapons, starvation and forced migration, 400,000-700,000 dead. All Obama-Clinton.

      Syria is what Benghazi was about.

      Liked by 26 people

      • singtune says:

        Right~! & the FACT that Syria is ANTI- NWO & International Banking etc., ~~made Syria a HUGE Target for the NWO~Global Master’s~! Hence Hillary & Obama bring the CIA & the USA into the Picture~! They WORK for the NWO~along with Rice~~Powers~McCain~Graham & many more~!!

        Liked by 3 people

      • Nick says:

        “Syria is what Benghazi was about.”
        EXACTLY! Hillary was using ISIS as her sick proxy army to terrorize the Syrian Christians and secular Muslims, and to try to destroy the elected Assad regime that has always protected them. Most of ISIS in Syria is not made up of Syrians, they are radicals, degenerates and mercs from Sunni countries who invaded Syria. Many of them had to leave as the Russians and Assad have defeated them, and ended up as “refugee” / rape-fugee migrants in Europe…and now American & Canada.

        Like

    • Eris says:

      Susan Rice had the cooperation of the Lying Dishonest Press.

      Liked by 3 people

    • lou Ann Watson says:

      ” it was Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice and Samantha Power who convinced President Obama to go to war in Libya”

      a firing squad is too good for these chicken hawks

      Liked by 5 people

    • Howie says:

      And where were the republicans?…Oh I get it. Covering for Linda and McInsane.

      Liked by 2 people

  2. PJ says:

    Can someone succinctly explain to me why this Obama/ Clinton/Jarrett Admin. so heavily interfered in mid- eastern affairs and regime changes after the whithering criticism they admonished on the Bush Admin. for involvement in Afganistan and Iraq? Seems quite hypocritical. What Bush did was a drop in the bucket compared to Arab Spring, Libyan, Syrian and Egyption turmoil….especially it is now revealed this Admin. funded and provided arms for this turmoil.. (Hello Benghazi…and illegal gunrunning)
    Why did we fund that fiasco….what was the purpose or endgame?
    Where is the typical Dem. peaceniks? Why aren’t they screaming for ” change” from this WARMONGERING ADMIN. like they did when Bush Admin. decided to take the fight to the troublemakers. The Obama Admin has created millions of trouble makers….and importing then here.

    Liked by 5 people

    • Eris says:

      It’s call “never let a good crisis go to waste”. The endgame is to do the bidding of their Islamic masters in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States which figured out a while back to recycle the Petrodollars into power and influence over the Western politicians to our detriment. Of course not everything worked out the way these Keystone Cops planners hoped which is why we have a big mess in the Middle East.

      Liked by 2 people

    • spindlitis says:

      Muslim brotherhood. That’s who they back. I believe ValJar’s parents were involved in creating it.

      Liked by 11 people

      • farmhand1927 says:

        If Hillary gets in, we’ll swap out ValJar for Huma Weiner. Unelected people running our country with deep ties to the Muslim Bros and other organizations. I’ve seen film clips of Hillary shaking hands at rallies and Huma runs interference for her, she pretty much performs a SS role, pushing people back, blocking people she doesn’t want to have access to Hillary. It is rare to see one without the other.

        Liked by 4 people

    • darththulhu says:

      The reason the peaceniks are silenced is that the Republican half of the neocon UniParty is, on the whole, Even More Belligerent. Clinton is John McCain in a pantsuit, but voting for Romney would have meant voting for all of Darth Cheney’s brood getting back into the seats at State and Defense.

      This is the primary advantage of Trump, to someone who votes on foreign policy. If you have any peacenik friends and family, make it 100% clear to them that a vote for Clinton is a vote for more Iraqs and Libyas and Syrias and Ukraines and Yemens and Hondurases … and that a vote for Trump is NOT.

      Liked by 16 people

      • Exactly. I’m voting for Trump on foreign policy and for anti-war reasons.

        Getting rid of ISIS is cleaning up our mess. We broke it – we pay for it. Trump is the ultimate fair businessman. We’re just lucky Russia is willing to chip in just to keep their naval base in Syria.

        It’s not that global community is bad. It’s that global socialist bureaucracy is bad. “Migrant crisis” is ultimate proof of globalist ineptitude. The world deserves a team, not a committee of sneaky socialist idiots powered by crony deals and Darth Soros emails.

        Liked by 16 people

    • singtune says:

      This WAR To DESTABILIZE the ME~~Started way back with BUSH#1~~

      Liked by 7 people

    • Jason says:

      lots of money to be made by installing new govt willing to make deals as thanks for putting them in power and at the expense of the people who live there. Clinton Cash puts it in perspective pretty quickly

      Like

    • Bull Durham says:

      Understand that foreign policy is a continuum. Regardless of who is in the WH, dem or repub, the hegemony of the US is constant. The policy goal for the last 25 years, since the fall of the USSR, in the ME and Balkans and aimed at Russia, is to break up all regimes in place, splinter their nations into small pieces and rule over the region for gas and oil pipelines.

      Remember Cheney and Halliburton? His goal. Coinciding with Saudi and Qatari desires for gas and oil pipelines through Syria.

      Then combine that with Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle’s masterplan to protect Israel and make it the regional hegemon of the ME.
      “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.” 1996.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Clean_Break:_A_New_Strategy_for_Securing_the_Realm
      It was pitched to Bill Clinton in 1996. He refused it. George W. Bush bought it. Obama continued it.

      Lay those over Zbigniew Brzenski’s Grand Chessboard which was 1997, his plan to contain Russia and China, and use Central Asia to keep Eurasia from developing as one unified landmass.

      This inevitable union of Russia and China had been predicted in in Mackinder’s Heartland Theory, 1904. His thesis is stated in three statements.
      Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland (Russia-1904 east of the Volga).
      Who rules the Heartland commands the World-Island (Eurasia).
      Who rules the World-Island commands the world.

      The great goal of ZB was to stop Germany and Russia from uniting, and to stop Russia and China from uniting. NATO controls Germany, but now, Russia and China have a special strategic cooperative partnership. It is not yet an alliance, but they are working together diplomatically to create a multi-polar world, not a unipolar, hegemon dominated world.

      So, all these goals and theories have led to the mess we keep replaying.

      Trump would stop most of this.

      That is why they want him gone.

      Liked by 17 people

      • lou Ann Watson says:

        he plays his own game and they don’t like it…

        Liked by 1 person

      • Bull Durham says:

        I’ll add this. Trump has stated in one, maybe two recent rallies, that the goal used to be to keep Germany and Russia apart, but now it was to keep Russia and China apart, and then he accused Obama for driving the two together.

        So, he’s no geopolitical expert, but Trump knows what is going on. He understands the dynamics of history and current events.

        No other political figure or expert has expressed this same knowledge.
        Trump has many reasons why getting along with Russia is imperative. It is not just to fight ISIS.

        Liked by 10 people

        • singtune says:

          Exactly~! I believe that Countering the NWO~~Is One Solid reason~beyond Getting Rid of ISIS!

          Liked by 3 people

        • Others may know but not have the same goals or Americas best interests at heart. Me am not convinced that Americas leaders do what they do out of stupidity and yet prefer Mr Trump to cont to call them stupid v evil ad that is easier for people believe. Although, he is now calling out the admin’s role in ISIL, eventually, after the election, may come to label them correctly when the evidence is overwhelming and most people begin to see it for themselves. Won’t be as hard for them to believe when he says it

          Liked by 1 person

        • chasingfactsblog says:

          But, would you say China’s moves in SC Sea and “dissident” crack down with recent anti-western public speech- really a purge and preparation for war- signals that we are entering a new phase in national hegemonies. South China Sea may be just an energy resource move, but are they strong enough now for an overt challenge to US in Asia. Certainly we are weak enough with bumbler in chief.

          Like

    • JeremyR says:

      Without double standards the press would have no standards except maybe sub-standards.

      Liked by 1 person

    • joninmd22 says:

      Pride and ego. They wanted to show liberalism was superior to realpolitik.

      Like

    • Cheryl says:

      Council on Foreign Relations…end game Redraw the Map of the Middle East:
      http://www.globalresearch.ca/plans-for-redrawing-the-middle-east-the-project-for-a-new-middle-east/3882

      Like

  3. Eris says:

    Just saw NBC Nightly News coverage of Mr. Trump’s ISIS founder statement. They claim that – wait for it – it’s all Bush’s fault for making the agreement with the Iraqi government to withdraw US forces by 2011. They also claimed that Obummer was just fulfilling his 2008 campaign promise to withdraw all US troops from Iraq.

    So the Obummer Administration has no responsibility in evaluating the power vacuum situation in Iraq and taking action to avoid a bad outcome to US national security interest ? Who was Secretary of State in 2010 who failed to negotiate (on purpose ?) a new Status Of Force Agreement (SOFA) with the Iraqi government that resulted in the complete withdrawal of US forces in 2011 which did not have to happen if there was a new SOFA.

    The “buck” apparently never stops at the desk of the Obummer Administration. SMH.

    Liked by 6 people

  4. Briana says:

    Trump needs to detail this, and also use charts, so that the average person understands.

    Liked by 3 people

  5. The old hag’s email was Hrod17 ? As in president H Rod. Obsessed much?

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Sherlock says:

    Want to get really fired up? Read this great Pat Buchanan column from today calling for “An American Spring!” Great stuff! GO TRUMP!!
    http://buchanan.org/blog/yes-system-rigged-125529

    Liked by 13 people

    • Sherlock says:

      The absolute arrogance of the rejected media, the rejected GOPe, and the rejected globalists still seek to call the shots and tell us “Trump is not acceptable” to them.
      Well, as Pat says, “They are not acceptable to US!” GO TRUMP!!

      Liked by 14 people

    • sDee says:

      Good piece. Of course he skirts the truth about who they answer to, why they have gutted America, and why they are offered no choice, by those who own their souls, but to try and stop it.

      I believe we near the very end of the path our Founders expected an ignorant electorate to take this Republic….the path they feared and the path the first citizens intended to block off by demanding our Bill of Rights.

      I also believe there will be a true Second American Revolution should the ruling class stop our peaceful revolution.

      Cold Anger has it limits.

      Liked by 8 people

      • singtune says:

        sDee~~Yes Pat Seems to be Following TRUMP~~& is also REVEALING the TRUTH “Gradually”~~as TRUMP does~! Pat also Knows what is going on~~clearly~!

        Liked by 7 people

        • sDee says:

          Yes – skirting the truth means he knows where it lies. Trump too – oh so well.

          Like

          • Sherlock says:

            Pat has been telling the truth for decades–that’s why they threw him out of the party, literally, in one of their “purges”. Don’t expect it all in one daily column–read his books and you’ll see that he has never skirted the truth–far from it, he has told it loudly and proudly, even when it cost him.

            Liked by 4 people

            • sDee says:

              I do read him. He must skirt the truth about the sedition within – about just how far our own government has gutted our law, our Constitution and our sovereignty or be blacklisted from all TV and print..

              Trum ptoo. He says our politicians ares incompetent – he knows they are traitors.
              He says they make bad deals – he knows they have sold out their national sovereignty and it s people.

              It is a dangerous game. Lethal.

              Liked by 3 people

            • Nick says:

              I think sometimes if you let the truth all out at once, without enough of a reputation, they can either label you a kook too easily, OR have you killed in a “robbery”, etc. It seems the trick is to let out enough truth over time so that as it adds up, you not only convince people step by step, but you build up a following so its more risky & suspicious for the powers-that-be to take you out. I think Pat & Donald are both using this strategy in their various ways. I’ve been praying for protection for Donald, and I will add Pat to the prayer tonight…

              Liked by 2 people

      • Don’t cheat us at the polls. The media lying to us now, and throwing in with Hillary, also counts as a revolutionary-grade offense against The People. At least, that is what the Declaration of Independence is telling me.

        The media needs to rethink their behavior. They are harming the nation, and committing fraud. This is very serious stuff. Another president elected by fraud will not be accepted. Peacefully or otherwise, it will not end well for the media. I suggest they stop lying.

        Liked by 8 people

        • sDee says:

          The media has no choice. This is their job. They do or are replaced – instantly.

          Liked by 2 people

        • Sherlock says:

          They are desperate, shrill, almost psychotic in their fear and loathing of Trump. I’ve never seen anything like it. They muster more vitriol for Trump–and therefor for us–than they ever have for America’s enemies. Nary a patriotic voice raised in anger in the press on 9/11, and now they are in a fervor to save America from US? Please, spare me.

          Liked by 12 people

          • Brilliantly stated. Quoted for posterity in my WP history.

            They are desperate, shrill, almost psychotic in their fear and loathing of Trump. I’ve never seen anything like it. They muster more vitriol for Trump–and therefor for us–than they ever have for America’s enemies. Nary a patriotic voice raised in anger in the press on 9/11, and now they are in a fervor to save America from US? Please, spare me.

            Like

    • I surely hope & pray we have that peaceful revolution through the ballot box.
      If not, then a violent revolution it will be,eventually.

      1st to blame, the Est.Rino Republicans, all those like the Bushes, Mc Cain, The Snake, etc
      2nd the rigged election by Hillary & the Uniparty.

      We will topple you.

      Like

  7. maxx power says:

    Add to all this. We don’t know anything about all the OTHER black ops brennan has been running all over Africa. We know about Benghazi because it went all CF. There is much more going on there.

    Liked by 4 people

  8. Team Trump needs to back-up Trumps claim that Obama and Clinton help found ISIS with the facts which are abundantly available from sources such as Judicial Watch. Unfortunately the vast majority of the population are completely ignorant about the facts around the creation of ISIS and they will dismiss Trump’s comments as “crazy talk” (“proof” he is “unfit” to be President) unless they are educated.

    Team Trump should send out Gen. Flynn to sell the public on Trump’s assertion. Flynn was the head of the DIA and he knows what the facts are. He has told foreign media that the Obama administration made a “willful decision” to support rebel groups that morphed into ISIS as a way of toppling Assad.

    More than anything else – the Obama/Clinton policies in Syria created ISIS. I don’t believe that the supposed “vacuum” of withdrawing troops from Iraq are to blame. Likewise Clinton’s overthrow of Qaddafi in Libya added more fuel to the fire.

    https://levantreport.com/2015/08/06/former-dia-chief-michael-flynn-says-rise-of-islamic-state-was-a-willful-decision-and-defends-accuracy-of-2012-memo/

    Liked by 3 people

    • bamainatlanta says:

      I completely agree! Trump needs to give details.or have others show the clear evidence that we have been supporting Islamic savages over a Christian protecting secular leader in Assad.

      Liked by 2 people

    • mdaush says:

      I saw General Flynn on Morning Joe several weeks ago and his praise for Trumps listening skills and pertinent questions asked of Flynn was an overwhelming compliment to Trump. Of course, they had him off the interview as quick as they could!
      flynn is a compelling spokesman but the media will not show him ever again…..too convincing.

      Liked by 1 person

  9. LM says:

    Sad to say it seems that the Muslim Brotherhood, along with various Arab Governments, are among the primary “advisors” of Hillary and Obama….along with Soros.

    http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/03/29/hillary-clintons-muslim-brotherhood-problem/

    http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/wikileaks-confirms-hillary-sold-weapons-isis-drops-another-bombshell-breaking-news/

    Liked by 4 people

    • jetstream says:

      Second link re Wikileaks bombshell was very good. Comment by ‘Melissa’, there, was a true summation of what we are up against. Thanks for posting the links.

      Like

  10. Read this Article from 2015 – explains how Obama and other countries wanted to have an islamic state in Syria to replace Assad. “http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/asia/item/20943-u-s-intel-obama-coalition-supported-islamic-state-in-syria”

    Liked by 1 person

  11. I don’t think any of them were stupid. I think they set out to flip countries for the Califate.
    Notice all of those overthrown dictators kept AQ in check & we’re pretty decent to Christians.
    No coinsidence.

    Liked by 2 people

    • sDee says:

      There are only to stable-states in a muslim country:

      Brutal tyranny under Sharia law, and, brutal dictatorship to prevent Sharia Law.

      Anything else we might see is a transition between the two.

      Liked by 1 person

      • The dictators have to be brutal to keep AQ, now Isis in check.
        But why topple them, only one reason I can see is to bring on the Shiria & further the world domination of Islam.

        Which is exactly what is going on in Germany,France,Eu, on & on & on.
        That is also BO’s & Clinton’s plan for USA.
        I’m wondering, Did Huma convert Hillary?
        Or is she just in it for the Saudi money, money, money?

        Liked by 2 people

        • sDee says:

          We topple them to bring them, eventually, under globalist control.

          In the meantime…. Western governments know that the terrorists and refugees of Islam are highly effective bringing western populations to their knees in fear. A thousand years of tyrants can attest that natural slaves will surrender rights when they fear for their lives. Look no further than the appeasement and capitulation of Europe.

          Americans carry different genes and remain armed.

          “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. – Benjamin Franklin

          Liked by 2 people

          • sDee says:

            You may find some answers here… Why We Are Afraid, A 1400 Year Secret

            Like

          • JeremyR says:

            Not all Americans. There are a large percentage here in America who would preemptively surrender.
            That said, only 3% of Americans took up arms to fight the British. A hand full more supported them, and another 3% supported the crown. It was a test of will. 80-90% of the population just wanted to get on with their lives.
            Fast forward to WW2, once again the vast majority of the population wanted peace at all costs. Many would have preemptively surrendered to Japan just to keep us out of the fight. It is no secret that FDR risked it all. They knew in advance about the Japanese attacks coming. Some debate the where, but he made sure our carriers were at sea, safe and sound and in a direction from which the Japanese fleet was unlikely to approach.
            66% of the soldiers who served in WW2 were drafted. BTW, in Vietnam, less than 33% of the combat troops were draftees. It took a lot to get those men to fight in 1942. Sure, they were mad, but social norms being what they were, killing even a charging Jap was difficult.
            Back to Vietnam, while we drafted quite a few, most draftees were sent to noncombat rolls simply because we had enough JFK volunteers who believed in doing all they could for our country. I numbered two brothers, numerous cousins, both male and female, and two of three brothers in law among that select group.
            When I came of age Vietnam was in the rear view mirror, and I blamed a certain republican for that. As soon as I was old enough to join, with parental permission, I was signed up in the National Guard, and off to basic.
            At the same time, all through our history, there have been people who would give up every thing to preserve peace. Then again, if Stalin had invaded, they might have taken up arms. To support Stalin.
            We have been blessed with some great military leaders. May we still have a few in the wings.

            Like

        • JJ says:

          Hillary and most high ranking Democrats are just in it for the money. Many, though, have been fooled by political correctness to believe that Western civilization is compatible with Islam. It’s not.

          That’s why even Fox and GOP Congressional leaders are trying to stop Trump.

          Like

  12. Mr. Morris says:

    The “three vaginas”‘ Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice, and Samantha Powers bear responsibility for the disasters in Libya and Syria and the rise of ISIS in the Middle East and Africa. Without the assent of Barack Hussein Obama none of this would be possible. I assume Chuck Todd, George Stephanopolis, John Dickerson, the dancing Wolf Blitzer, and perhaps Chris Wallace are still celebrating the brilliance of the Obama regime.
    For many of us the reality of this horror is revolting.

    Liked by 4 people

  13. TatonkaWoman says:

    Janet – I’ll opt for the devil.

    Like

  14. NJF says:

    Great analysis SD.

    What’s truly ironic is that she set up a secret off site in order to subvert transparency, yet never gave thought to how secure it would be. I do believe she was that stupid, and her main concern was hiding what she was doing. Comey described as “less secure than a Gmail account. None of it would have ever come to light if not for the hacked Blumenthal account.

    She brought all on herself.

    Poetic justice.

    Liked by 5 people

  15. JoD says:

    I had planned to post the number of people killed by ISIS
    since Obama’s famous JV remark in January 2014.
    I will spare you.
    The numbers are staggering and will literally make you sick.

    Like

  16. sDee says:

    Of course Obama chose to carry out his assigned tasks by sponsoring islamic terrorist armiesin order to destabilize the middle east .

    After all the man who, quite literally, shaped mind of Obama at Columbia University was Zbigniew Brzezinski – the same man who destabilized Iran with islamists and the same man who created Osama Bin Laden and the Mujaheddin in Afganistan.

    Liked by 5 people

  17. JoeS says:

    Funny:

    “The administration had no idea what the ideology behind the Benghazi Rebels actually was.”

    Hint:

    If they are running around the middle east with AK-47s toppling a government, there is a pretty good chance that we need to find out first what their ideology is because it probably ain’t good!

    Like

  18. Bull Durham says:

    If some of us feel powerless in the midst of the assault of distortion and lies of the media and polling orgs, we can take the fight to them. Attack them with a shaming campaign. Use Twitter like Bluto and Howie and never let up. The truth is powerful and the People possess power, but don’t use it.

    Trump cannot do everything. It is up to us to crush the Media Lies.
    Trump will crush Hillary with her lies.
    The Polls and the Media will buckle under our assaults using social media and comments everywhere. We have some very loud megaphones in Drudge and Breitbart. And this CTH is very influential. We have a pipeline opening up. Bluto to Bill Mitchell. We need more. Particularly into the heart of the campaign and/or the kids.

    Get thinking. Get working on it. Don’t think we can’t force change and level somewhat the field.

    Scare the hell out of reporters with an avalanche of Truth. It is ours to disseminate. Do it.

    Build teams of friends, family, contacts. It’s digital warfare, cyber warfare.

    Bring them to their knees. They are advertising media. They are scared of losing $$$.

    Work them over. The passion you have for America, express it in action.

    Ask your kids or grandkids to pitch in. Trump risks his family. You can use yours.

    Liked by 6 people

  19. feralcatsblog says:

    Mirror, mirror on the Blood Drenched Wall
    Who is most like Mohammad, all Muslim’s “Perfect Man”, of them all?
    Why, you are ISIS, you are!

    Like

  20. Bull Durham says:

    Since it’s “Friday” night, here’s a little inspiration for tomorrow, another Friday:

    Like

  21. Martin says:

    Liked by 1 person

  22. Martin says:

    Liked by 1 person

  23. three by one says:

    For the purpose of communicating the article to the masses, great simplification of the excellent article will be needed.

    20 years ago, the rule in television news was you tell your story at a 7th grade level.

    Currently, newsies and PIO’s (Public Information Officers) are taught that your message should be at a 5th grade level.

    Set aside bemoaning the slide in literacy and comprehension levels. It is what it is.

    The detailed stories as above must remain. They are the bedrock upon which the treachery and incompetence of Clinton, Rice & Powers is defined.

    Getting that information through to the masses is the challenge.

    Whether by an executive summary, timeline, bullet-pointed list, or even a series of cartoons, the story must be told at a level a broad spectrum of people are comfortable with.

    Don’t laugh at using cartoons, the military has done it for decades to educate a force that spans the spectrum of intelligence, interest and motivation. No offense intended. It is what it is.

    Do we have any graphics artists/cartoonists in our ranks or know of any?

    How about someone well-versed in presentations (Simple ones, not death by PowerPoint)

    How do we tell this story at a level everyone can understand?

    Liked by 2 people

  24. Sayit2016 says:

    In the mean time…knowing all of these facts on the table….The media is screaming hysterically Trump ” went too far’ in saying Obama is the founder of ISIS. Well. Trump never ” goes too far” in my opinion… telling the truth to the chattering class is seen as ” going too far”. Hey Barack… you pathetic man child…. in the real world the buck stops with the President. If you allowed Hillary, Rice, et all to lead you in this direction. You take the responsibility for it.

    Like

    • Howie says:

      If any of this radioactive material ever escapes confinement it will be shuffled off to the MSM truth graveyard of The Sean Hannitty Show to be ignored.

      Liked by 1 person

  25. Howie says:

    The entire US Media and the DOJ are in place and actie in covering these Hate Facts up until after the election.

    Like

  26. Clc says:

    Haven’t seen the name isreal mentioned here. Me thinks their hands are very dirty in all of this.

    Like

  27. bertdilbert says:

    Don’t know if this has been said before but is worthy of consideration.

    Libya did not give to the Clinton Foundation. Other Arab oil producing countries in the region did. By taking out Libya oil production it helped all of Hillary’s proven doners to the Clinton Foundation.

    That would be a great one to slap Hillary with during a debate. Shows how doners influence policy.

    Liked by 2 people

  28. Howie says:

    Why the GOP helps in the cover up.

    Liked by 1 person

  29. wyntre says:

    The POS admits he funded ISIS(L).

    Liked by 1 person

  30. JJ says:

    Not only are Obama and Hillary responsible for ISIS, they’re now responsible for the wave of Islamic jihadists flooding Europe (of course, not without some really ignorant European leaders acquiescing). They’re responsible for ISIS training camps in northern Mexico which clear and present danger which this administration is ignoring.

    The left has very little understanding of Islamic culture, or simply does not care, because of the flow of oil money. Islam is a big proponent of a certain form of moral code, Sharia, but the same laws under Sharia allow Muslims to break any other laws that are non-Sharia. They do not negotiate lightly. They do not surrender. And there can never be peace between Western civilization and Islam. Empirical evidence over the last 1,350 years confirms this.

    But now, the genie is out of the bottle in Europe, and it cannot be put back with political correctness and appeasement, period.

    Liked by 1 person

  31. wyntre says:

    MUST WATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Putin explains the U.S. responsibility for ISIS in a clip recorded in 2015 with nearly 10 million views.

    The part about ISIS-US starts at 1:43.

    Liked by 2 people

  32. JJ says:

    Imagine being in the military right now, especially Special Forces – being forced to run guns and train people who you know damned well want to kill Americans.

    Like

  33. andi lee says:

    19 March 2011
    U.S. lead Coalition commences Operation: “Odyssey Dawn”

    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/odyssey-dawn.htm

    Like

  34. andi lee says:

    Oops!

    Like

  35. andi lee says:

    Like

  36. andi lee says:

    20 August 2011
    Benghazi, Libya
    National Transition Council
    NATO
    MSM
    Psychological Warfare Operation : “Siren”

    http://metrogael.blogspot.com/2011/08/from-operation-odyssey-dawn-to.html?m=1#.T0ML-iV2uZA.twitter

    Like

  37. cali says:

    Hillary owns the destruction of Libya and the assassination after being sodomized of Ghaddafi! If ever there were war crimes committed – Libya is that place and Hilary is the war criminal. For the former colonial power – France – their involvement was based on a ‘war for oil’. Then there is the mysterious 3.5 billion dollars investment by Ghaddafi using Goldman Sachs – that disappeared around the same time. Ghaddafi also made plans to discard the Petro dollar and use ‘gold’ as currency – planning to join the anti-US BRICS alliance.
    Before I comment further – Hillary callous statement on national TV was this: “We came – we saw -he died – followed by her devlish cackle. Those optics were beyond that of a person that was the SOS during that period. Did her mental health and irrational reasoning based on her brain malfunction played a role in that? I would not doubt it!
    The UN never authorized the bombing campaign nor the overthrow of Ghadafi. Their own UN inspectors could not find credibility in Hillary et al and her accusations against Ghaddafi slaughtering his own citizens. It was fabricated!
    During that time – DIA chief at the DOD was Flynn – whom had back channel communications with Ghaddafi to leave the country and satisfy the demand to relinquish power. Hillary et al outright rejected that and plans for Ghaddafi and his family to leave Libya and go into exile. Hillary managed to piss off the DOD and Pentagon whom advised Hillary to stop the outright war in Libya.
    Alas – it was not meant to be and together with Sid Blumenthal, Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills – that war moved forward. Blumenthal himself provided manipulated and false intelligence to justify their actions because he had a tremendous business interest in Libya but required the coup against Ghaddafi.
    The CIA rendition site in Benghazi and their purpose was the turning point of Hillary et al and this administration throwing into their lot with the jihadists forming the deadly ISIS – made up of AQ, muslim brotherhood, answer al-islam and host of other offshoot jihadists group.
    The US/CIA sponsored civil war in Syria began at the same time the administration in Egypt was overthrown for the same reason and purpose of Libya and pending Syria.
    It was also the full entrance of the Putin intelligence services entering the access of the three (3) Hillary servers to gain a perspective what Hillary et al was up to. It was then that they copied 22,000 emails from her server made easy by Hillary providing her password by mistake. Subsequently – the 400 tons shipment of military hardware and weapons Destined for Syria via Turkey was also surveilled by Putin’s intelligence when the ship was docked in Turkey. Shipping the ISIS jihadists to Syria together with the massive weapons arsenal of Ghaddafi including MANPADS (although some of them showed up in Afghanistan shooting down American chopper – was used by Putin during back channels to let this administration be known that the ‘red line’ as planned to start a war in Syria should be mood – it did because this president never mentioned it again after that.
    Also remember that the Turkish consul just ended a visit with Stevens in Benghazi that after his safe departure immediately began the attack on that CIA rendition site in Benghazi.
    The new Iraq president in Irag together with his cabinet, King Hussein in Jordan and a host of others publicly declared that ISIS is sponsored by the US causing death and destruction once again in Iraq and elsewhere blaming it all on the US administration and Hillary et al. This article appeared on Yahoo causing concern in the white being so exposed in their intentions that they dispatched Ash Carter to visit with leaders in Iraq, Jordan and other countries as a means to stop these public exposure.
    To this day – the Assad/Syria – overthrow has not been successful mainly due to Putin stepping in and stopping the imperialism there although thousands of Syrian civilians have been slaughtered.
    Hillary – the choice of Saudi Arabia, Wall Street et al and globalists – will finish what she started – overthrowing the Syrian administration to satisfy her benefactors in Saudi Arabia who have financed her campaign in the tune of 45+ million dollars. Their visit one months ago – announced arriving at the white house but were rebuffed. They demanded to meet with this president and Hillary which was granted and demanding the US to declare war in Syria using once again our military personnel to fight their dirty wars because they need control of Syria to built their pipeline.

    As it stands today – Vladimir Putin is the only leader on the stage right now – doing all he can to stop the coup in Syria as well as WWIII. That is Hillary’s duty as she sold that for millions of dollars for her family money laundering op and the piper is at her door to collect his dues. With her mental/neurological disorders or other serious health issues she is a danger to all of us but also to the world and can not be allowed into the white house.

    Like

  38. Angry Dumbo says:

    I’m not sure if the US media will ever get to substance. The timeline here is easy to follow and incontrovertible, when the US exited Iraq, AQ-Iraq reopened as ISIS.

    Like

  39. truthseekerr says:

    email bad bad grammer… reminds me of myself.

    Like

  40. v4ni11ista says:

    This is the Witch which we despise
    That left the Libyan Ambassador to die
    That was there in the first place to cover her lies
    That armed the crazy jihadis who cry
    That Allah is great to their clueless surprise
    That blinds the Left
    That brings the folk
    That take a few lives then about it do joke
    That equate the cultures
    That cut the (bits)
    That cause all their daughters to awkwardly sit
    That rape the kids
    That are sometimes goats
    That cause Old King O’ in the Whitehouse to gloat

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s