Libya is “Hillary’s War” – Released emails Show Depth of Hillary Clinton Ownership…

The U.S. State Department released more of Hillary Clinton’s emails today.  One of those emails is noted as originating on March 22nd 2011, the exact day President Obama launched the attacks on Libya.


The newly released email confirms what many already knew – it was Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice and Samantha Power who convinced President Obama to go to war in Libya:

“Turning POTUS around on this is a major win for everything we worked for”..

hillary email 4

Last year we noted an article at Real Clear Politics which hit on one of the key aspects of the Benghazi fiasco media have been hell-bent on hiding; Hillary Clinton, not President Obama, is actually the person responsible for the crisis in Libya.

When we watched the House Select Committee on Benghazi hearings, it was interesting to note how no-one really went ‘there‘ to give Clinton full ownership of the 2011 Libyan Intervention; ownership she deserves.  So let’s review Clinton’s ownership.

Sarkosy with Clinton - whatz weeth you americanz nowIt’s as if both congress and the media have forgotten those ridiculous 19-days in 2011 when Hillary was flying back-and-forth to meet with French Prime-Minister Sarkozy and plan their endeavors.

In the U.S. presidential adviser Samantha Power was bending Obama’s ear with declarations of a “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P) the Eastern Libyan citizens from the boogie man narrative assigned to Gadaffi.

Meanwhile in New York, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice was answering calls from her British and French counterparts who were similarly selling an interventionist message.

Back in the White House, President Obama was reluctant to engage. It was Secretary Clinton working overtime to bring the President into the same line of thinking as herself.

In a moment of rare bi-partisanship many Democrats and Republicans were aligned with the White House in not wanting to intervene in Libya. Of course, there was John McCain and Lindsey Graham who joined with Team Clinton to bomb yet another nation into civil war. But too his initial credit, Obama was reluctant.

February 2011 France’s Sarkozy almost immediately began calling for the ouster of Kaddaffi and requesting Western nations to get involved to insure Kaddaffi fell. Sarkozy was quite passionate about it – which struck many observers as odd because he was ‘so far out’ ahead of any nation on this position.

However, unlike Egypt, as the fighting intensified in February 2011 President Obama was curiously silent around Libya.

This initial non-reaction was played by the adoring U.S. media as Obama being calm under pressure. However, this calm was beset by the reality of what was actually reported to be taking place on the ground in Libya. The word “slaughter” was in almost every article.

Meanwhile President Obama seemed unfazed, and strangely quiet. So much so that Sarkozy was demanding President Obama say something, anything. This U.S. silence went on for over two full weeks until eventually the media headlines began to question the Obama strategy, or, well actually, the lack thereof.

This culminated in a weekend around February 24, 25 and 26th, 2011, when headlines began to read that Kaddaffi “strafes” while Obama “golfs”. and astoundingly enough the Libyan Ambassador to the U.S. went on national television and begged for Obama to do something, ANYTHING.

Then a seemingly innocuous event transpired which actually summarized the lack of U.S. leadership quite well. This became the origin of the “leading from behind” sentiment.

It is important to understand that under President Obama the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations is actually a cabinet level position.

In 2011 Ambassador Susan Rice and Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, were essentially equal peers.

Ambassador Rice representing Obama to the U.N. in New York, and Secretary Clinton representing Obama to nations while “on-the-road” so to speak. Under the leadership structure of Obama’s cabinet both held equal and equivocal rank.

During that critical February weekend when the world was desperately demanding some form of action around the civil war in Libya, Sarkozy was having visible fits on EU television and trying to put together a European coalition.

In direct response to Sarkozy’s pleas the U.N. announced an emergency Security Council meeting of the six prominent nations to determine what, if any, action could be taken to stop what was described as the “pending slaughter in Libya”.

However, instead of attending that emergency U.N. Security Council meeting February 25th, 2011, Ambassador Rice went to South Africa to attend a global warming summit where they were discussing the danger of bovine flatulence (cow farts) as it relates to harming the environment.

Back in Washington DC the optics were even worse.

After ignoring cries for opinion, let alone involvement, and with Ambassador Rice blowing off the U.N. Security council meeting, and against the backdrop of media beginning to sense a detached president more interested in golf than Libya, the whole optical mess exploded.

Because on that very night when the U.N. Security Council met, a detached President Obama and his wife Michelle held a Motown Review Concert in the East Room of the White House.

Talk about a bad optic – You can’t make this stuff up !!

By itself the White House Motown Review Party seemed a bit detached, but against the backdrop of Hillary proclaiming hundreds of women and children are being strafed in the streets, the optic was horrendous.

The contrast was so bold, and so stark, and happened so fast, and was seen by Europe and the United Nations as, well, unfathomable. The proverbial water-carrying media couldn’t ignore it if they wanted to.

Recognizing what was unfolding a rapid White House team scrambled with a crisis response…..

Obama - One Flew Over the Cuckoo's NestAgainst two weeks of silence in February 2011, and a fawning U.S. media beginning to doubt their own beliefs in the administration, the White House begins damage control for their earlier detachment.

When Susan Rice skipped a Feb 25, 2011 emergency weekend U.N. Security Council meeting, the Obama administration was compromised in their ability to influence any real outcome in Libya.

Without the U.S. seated at the policy table the U.N. made two strategic resolutions/decisions which were brutally short-sighted.

The first mistake was a resolution banning the sale or transfer of arms or weaponry into Libya during the civil war. On it’s face the ban might sound like a generally good idea; however, in reality it was exceptionally self-defeating. After all, it banned all weapons from entering Libya, including weapons for the opposition – which most thought would be needed for the “rebels” to defend themselves.

The second mistake was criminal charges brought about by the ICC (International Criminal Court) against the Kaddaffi regime. Nothing tells a dictator to double down on his position like telling him you as soon as this is over we will lock you and your family up for life.

Essentially those charges filed by the ICC solidified the certainty that Kaddaffi would never compromise. He was forced into a singular position – either he would win the civil war, or he would die trying. Losing the war would mean death or a life in prison – one of these was now certain. What did Kaddaffi have to lose by fighting?

This Security Council resolution highlights the emotional short-sighted outcome of most U.N. determinations. However, historically the U.S. has tempered logic to the 6 nation table of stupidity. But not this time. This time, at the specific direction of President Obama and his policy team, the U.S. did not even participate.

Obama and Hillary - The French Foreign LegionHowever, while the White House may have been annoyingly quiet, Hillary Clinton certainly was not.

This lack of synergy led to multiple instances where Clinton’s publicly voiced opinion ran exactly opposite to the Obama administration’s position she was supposedly representing.

The international optic was a completely out of sync with the White House and State Department.

Sometimes embarrassingly so.

The U.S. government came under fire today for chartering a rescue boat for Americans stuck in Libya that is too small to cope with the rough Mediterranean sea.

Hundreds of American citizens were finally set to depart Tripoli harbour aboard the Maria Dolores, a small passenger ferry chartered by the U.S., trapped there by rough seas.

At the same time larger Greek and Turkish vessels have transported thousands of their own citizens to safety, crossing the choppy water to mainland Europe. (link)

The State Department was struggling with multiple plates spinning simultaneously.

Secretary Clinton was noticeably unprepared to handle the heavy lifting and President Obama was not in the mood to initially bail her out. From the botched messaging, to the failure to evacuate American citizens from Western Libya, we watched as it almost seemed President Obama was enjoying Hillary being overwhelmed.

While Hillary had been trying to fill the February 2011 void left by Obama’s silence, another key player was working policy structure behind the scenes.

One of Obama’s little known advisors named Samantha Power began to play a more important role.

Power is the wife of Regulatory Czar Cass Sunstein, in 2011 she was a foreign policy advisor to President Obama along with Denis McDonough and Tom Donilon.

Samantha Power Leaving White House West WingHowever, Power increasingly held a sway when it came to Libya, and her influence was soon noted with the introduction of the “Responsibility to Protect” Doctrine, or as it became known R2P.

Essentially her approach was to frame the possibility of defeat upon the Libyan Rebels in a similar venue as the historical Rwanda genocide. The potential slaughter of the Libyan Benghazi uprising was framed around a need for Humanitarian Intervention.

Despite the U.N Security Council resolution banning weapon distribution into Libya, the broad outline of a reason for U.S. intervention became visible. NATO would arm the rebellion and NATO would take action to “protect” the Benghazi rebels as Kaddaffi’s army moved ever closer to their weakly held positions.

Samantha Power – Susan Rice – President Obama – May 2011 during the decision to arm the Libyan “rebels”.

However, there was one big problem – WE HAD NO IDEA WHO THE REBELS WERE. The administration had no idea what the ideology behind the Benghazi Rebels actually was.

Some analysts believe the administration actually did know, but chose not to recognize the rebels’ affiliation with al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood and armed them anyway.

Others, namely CNN analysts, said there was no real way to identify the ideology and we were just going to have to take a chance on them.

Personally I think there is profoundly enough visible evidence to state the administration ‘had to know’. Why?

Because there were hundreds of on-the-ground reports from the region which accurately identified individually very specific people within the rebels as radical islamists. There is no intellectually honest way to believe the administration did not know they were supporting al-Qaeda affiliates and the Muslim Brotherhood. The signs were just too obvious.

Mustafa Abdel-Jalil (Picture taken Feb. 27th) Leader of Benghazi Opposition Council

Mustafa Abdel-Jalil (Picture taken Feb. 27th, 2011) Leader of Benghazi Opposition Council

One of the first signs was the very first Kaddaffi politician who defected from the regime and joined the rebellion. Interior Justice Minister, Mustafa Abdel Jalil.

Within 48 hours of Justice Abdel Jalil surfacing as the first defector, and becoming the defacto leader of the rebels, it was easily identifiable his ideology was for a sharia compliant Libya.

But the reality of the “rebels” being al-Qaeda affiliated made things complex. In essence the CIA and DoD knew if Kaddaffi fell the most likely scenario would be a rise of Islamic extremism.


The compounding problem was the massive stockpiles of weapons that were at stake in the equation.

If Kaddaffi fell, decades of weapons built up in hundreds of warehouses were going to be up for grabs. Weapons that included surface-to-air missiles, MANPADS, shoulder fired stinger missiles and tons of mustard gas and WMD.

Kaddaffi had built up massive amounts of arms over a period of three decades as the worlds most notorious international terrorist.

Very soon those weapons and missiles would go missing; and it was the retrieval of those missiles that led to a joint State Dept./CIA operation putting Ambassador Chris Stevens in Benghazi, Eastern Libya where he was assassinated in September the following year….

So, yeah – she owns this:

Hillary - orange is the new black

This entry was posted in Big Stupid Government, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Egypt & Libya Part 2, Election 2016, ISIS, Islam, Jihad, media bias, Military, NATO, Notorious Liars, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Secretary of State, Susan Rice, Terrorist Attacks, The Story of Libya, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

88 Responses to Libya is “Hillary’s War” – Released emails Show Depth of Hillary Clinton Ownership…

  1. notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital says:

    I conclude that means it’s Obama’s War too.

    Liked by 4 people

  2. feralcatsblog says:

    Don’t forget Lt. Fuzz Rubio. He was the chief cheer leader for getting rid of Qaddafi and kept pushing to do more and do it faster. Now he wants the same thing in Syria, having leaned absolutely nothing.

    Liked by 7 people

  3. ILoveAmerica says:

    Good analysis, but still pushing the propaganda that Gaddafi was the worst terrorist. I thought so too for decades and Gaddafi was no angel, that’s for sure. But if you read the following article you will find that Gaddafi did a LOT for his people: Build a water dam that brought clean water to 70% of population, good healthcare with lowest infant mortality in all of Africa, etc.
    The REAL reason these wars are fought is for money, specifically to ensure that Rothschilds have yet another private central bank, i.e. taking the money creation away from the representatives of the people (government) and into the hands of the private banksters.

    Liked by 11 people

    • Peter&Karen says:

      Very interesting…Trump has mentioned several time in rallies, not only to take the oil but to cut ISIS financing through the banking system.


    • sundance says:

      La Belle night club bombing. Target U.S. Military.
      Pan Am bombing. Target U.S. Citizens.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Bad dude for sure.
        He did flip for bush 43, after Saddam hung. Gave up nukes. Dropped a few dimes on the guys spreading nuke technology.

        Liked by 1 person

      • rmnewt says:

        LaBelle was in 86 as was our response, Operation Eldorado Canyon.
        Then Pan Am 103 came in 88, with a financial agreement of $2.7B settlement in 2003. Gadhafi or his gov may have been involved, but tough to prove and tough to rationalize why the he or the Libyan gov would do it.

        On the other hand, the Eastern Libyan Islamist were directly supporting Iraqi insurgents who were killing Americans in Iraq. Allying with them in order to overthrow Ghadhafi as Clinton etal did in 2011 provided direct support to our enemy. Typically referred to as treason.

        To your point, its doubtful this new Libya would celebrate any less the return of the Lockerbie bomber, Al Megrahi today. In fact particularly in Eastern Libya they’d cheer even louder.

        To your long write up, Clinton really needs to be held into account on why she pushed to ally with our direct enemy in order to overthrow Gadhafi.

        Further, we’ve seen Libya degenerate into chaos with an emboldened enemy of the US and our values in the East so we should ask her what she intended as the outcome and if its not what’s transpired what would she do to fix it now?
        Instead crickets, if she is the demo nominee, sure would like to see Trump debate her on this subject along with her litany of other foreign policy “accomplishments.”


    • ctdar says:

      he was also the gate keeper of the evil ones.

      Liked by 2 people

    • singtune says:

      I agree with you, in regard, to Gaddafi. He was a Good Leader for HIS People~!

      Liked by 1 person

    • lou Ann Watson says:

      reagan calmed him way down…sent a cruise missile into his house and killed his daughter.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Bull Durham says:

    Sarkosy was the father of the Libya air war. Clinton was the birthmother of the overthrow of Qaddafi, the rise of AQ in Libya and the midwife of Benghazi (4 dead Americans), the arms smuggling to Syrian rebels (ISIS and AQ) through Turkey, bankrolled by Qatar. She has her DNA, voice and finger prints and emails all over the mess in Libya and Syria.

    And she lied to the parents of the dead men, lied to the American public as the caskets lay next to her feet.

    Liked by 8 people

    • hocuspocus13 says:

      …and Hillary sold 20% of American Uranium to Russia for Clinton Foundation Consideration $$$$$

      Liked by 2 people

    • aprilyn43 says:

      @Bull Durham – Why is it surprising that Killery lied or people died b/c of her? Billy’s and Killy, have a long history of dead people; friends, enemies and people who irked them!
      No one held Billy accountable for his sex capades and raping adventures; nor anything else he pulled … WTC, Bombing of the Cole just to name but 2! And, Killery, did muderous PR for Billy! There’s a list of over 50 people who have died, been murdered; and the Clinton DNA and finger prints are all over these “mysterious” deaths. These two were committed criminals long before they entered the WH, plus during their WH days; anyone who thinks they are anything but criminally corrupt is either brain dead or on the take!
      The fact that Killery Clinton is running any campaign for president, with any success is a disgrace! Killy and Billy are murders and worse! Both should be in prison awaiting their death sentence being carried out.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. don welch says:

    so the ‘crats lie. what’s new? people die as the lies grew. now we’re through.


  6. Centinel2012 says:

    Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:

    We had four clowns playing games that they had no idea what the rules even were; Obama, Clinton, Rice and Powers. I would bet that Michelle Obama and Valerie Jarrett were also involved so it was the blind leading the bind and Obama was not capable of going up against five women. So we got what we got and lots of people died and the media covered this up so we also got 4 more years of Obama — what a deal!

    Liked by 4 people

  7. Powers husband is a major Neo-con so its not surprising that she was pushing for regime change.


  8. Howie says:

    She cleaned up in Libya. Millions. Lock her up.

    Liked by 4 people

  9. IMO says:

    For what ever reason community organizer obama gave Hillebeast the Secretary of State position so he has equal responsibility for all the chaos done in the Middle East. I hope they all go to hell.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. fnn says:

    BHO might have been made uncomfortable by the mass slaughters of blacks by the rebels. Kaddaffi imported a lot of Sub-Saharans and many of the locals resented it.


  11. Howie says:

    How convenient is Scalia?

    Liked by 1 person

  12. freepetta says:

    The ugly, beastly and ghastly. I sure hope they are sorry for all the pain and horror those imbeciles caused.


  13. beaujest says:

    If anyone other than Trump wins the country will never find out about all the terrible cover ups that have been in play !

    Liked by 4 people

    • R-C says:

      If anyone but Trump wins, we probably won’t have a country left to worry about. If Trump loses, the globalists win–and we ALL lose.

      Liked by 2 people

      • aprilyn43 says:

        @R-C – Sadly, even if Trump wins, we may never find out! Why, b/c it may be too late! The last 8-years have all but destroyed this country and I’m not sure we have another 12-months of strength left.
        At some point Obama should have been Impeached!


  14. freepetta says:

    The ugly, beastly and ghastly bunch.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Hillary Rodham was a year behind me in high school, and in 1963 was a Goldwater girl with me. That’s before she got turned into a Saul Alinsky student…sad, but true. She was once a hardcore staunch Constitutional conservative…until youth pastor Don Jones came along in the Methodist Church in the Village of Park Ridge where we both lived. Don Jones was an Alinskyite…and imparted some of his Marxist leanings with young impressionable minds, including Hillary’s. He actually traveled with her from time to time as her “spiritual adviser” up until his death a few years back.

    Liked by 4 people

  16. woohoowee says:

    Thus, “It was the video!” aka “squirrel!”


    • aprilyn43 says:

      @woohoowee – And remember, the film maker was put in jail for Killary’s, Obama’s, Panetta’s and Rice’s LIE! He still lives in fear of being “Murdered”!
      Four good Americans dead and this garbage laughs on!

      Liked by 2 people

  17. Honest Abbey says:

    This is good news for Bernie ….
    The next time they debate and she insists on saying “Don’t forget, before it was Obamacare, it was Hillarycare” and while she’s busy smirking and gloating from the sounds of cheers in the audience, he can lower the boom and remind her “Before Libya was Obama’s war, it was Hillary’s war”.

    Liked by 1 person

  18. zadatn says:

    Bill O’Reilly asked Trump why he called Hillary “evil” in an interview last week. Trump said it was the first word that came to his mind. Bill said, well why didn’t you call her “inept”. Trump said something like, well I could have said that. Remember, she said “we came, we saw, he died”. Then she laughed. That’s what makes her evil. How can you laugh when a friend has died?

    Liked by 3 people

  19. kenramsey says:

    Libya was informally (and derisively) known inside the Beltway as “The Girl’s War” at the time. The girls being Hillary, Rice and Power. It was an amazing and foreseeable clusterF on the build-up and the execution. Recall “kinetic action” and all that. Obama can’t escape all the blame, he did sanction it. But at the same time it was Hillary’s baby, the moment she was supposed to arrive on the foreign policy realm of history. I think Gallipoli went better.


    • R-C says:

      It was Hillary’s ‘baby’, all right. And her “arrival” on the foreign policy scene? A face-plant. WHAP!

      As for Obama? Oh, he owns this, too. As Harry S Truman knew too well, “The Buck Stops Here!” There is no shifting the blame to absolve the sitting president, whose administration started a WAR.


  20. R-C says:

    “…pray for a soft landing for everyone’s sake.” –email, HR Clinton to AM Slaughter, sent via Clinton’s unsecured server

    Well…apparently, they didn’t pray quite hard enough–if at all. We have four dead and this entire mess about to hit the fan.

    Clinton indeed ‘owns’ this mess, but so does Obama. In the end, sometimes the hardest part about being in a leadership position is saying what we will NOT do. And he went along with this fiasco.

    Wanna know what I pray? I pray that the full weight of the FBI’s investigations make it before a jury someday soon, and that this entire administration is made to pay for its serial abuses of power. I hope that is not to much to ask of the Almighty.


    • aprilyn43 says:

      @K-C – It’s not too much to ask of the Almighty, but the Miberal Democrats, well they will never send either Obama or Killery down the drain! Why, b/c they backed them and two, they still believe they were right!


  21. Brian L says:

    Is it just me or does Mr. Obama have a ton of war hungry women advising him?


  22. czarowniczy says:

    Just in case y’all be Havin’ any doubts that military dead bodies are the means that professional pols use to reach their ends…


    • aprilyn43 says:

      @czarosniczy – NO doubt with me!


      • czarowniczy says:

        Just ask State where thousands of WW II US POWs went, where hundreds of Korean War POWs went, try pumping Kissinger and McCain about those Vietnam POWs..oh crap, SSDD

        Liked by 1 person

        • aprilyn43 says:

          @Czarowniczy – Yep, the bodies of POWs lay in foreign graves; most unmarked … sadly, forgotten by most! Our military personel, “our soldiers” are the finest and the best of the best! It’s a National Disgrace !! Hang your heads in shame Americans!!
          Even today, our wounded soldiers, have to go to out side organizations to get the quality care these men and women deserve … And no one asks Why? … People like Paul Ryan write bills to reduce the pensions of military personnel who risk their lives … Why is that allowed? Ryan’s Congressional pension isn’t being touched; he sits in an office that at the very least cost $100,000 to re-decorate! … I think those in DC need a, “rude awakening”! Shame, shame, shame, America !


          • czarowniczy says:

            Preach in’ to the choir. I found out about the thousands of US POWs left in Russian hands aft WWII, a gift from Churchill and FDR to the Reds, some 20 years after the fact, then got stuck in the Korean/VN POW mess. I also had the misfortune of seeing the VA screw the vets they were created to help in the early 70s. In all cases Congress mouthed platitudes, greasing the skids of public memory, until care passed on. Yep, we were, are and always will be pawns.

            Liked by 1 person

            • wondering999 says:

              This about the POWs is not common knowledge, though:


              “On May 31, 1945, the top US commander in Moscow, Maj. Gen. John R. Deane, wrote a top secret letter to his Soviet counterpart stating that 15,597 American soldiers were believed to be under Soviet control. That same day, the War Department in Washington announced “substantially all” American soldiers taken prisoner in Europe had been accounted for.

              “On June 1, 1945, Eisenhower signed a cable that read: “It is now estimated that only small numbers of U.S. prisoners of war still remain in Russian hands.”

              “In other words,” states the May 23, 1991, US Senate Foreign Relations Committee Minority Report on POW/MIA policy, “on June 1, 1945, the US government’s public position was that most America GIs taken prisoner have come home and been repatriated, even though the cable traffic for the previous fortnight was reporting between 15,000 and 20,000 still held.”

              “What happened to these men?

              “American betrayal.”


              • czarowniczy says:

                The numbers, including the ones Churchill gave away, has been estimated to be closer to 25k. Part of the reason they were sacrificed was that the Russians were a bit miffed at the Allies reluctance to ‘repatriate’ the Don Cossacks to the tender mercies of the Russian death squads. The Russians also needed men to rebuild Russia as they’d lost so many men in the war.
                The records of those ‘lost’ were quite plain, the Germans had detailed records of hom they help Allied POWs -they maintained detailed records of the Jews they kill and burned in the concentration camps. If one were inclined to disbelieve the Germans the Intrnational Red Cross had detailed records of Allied POWs in German Stalags and even compared their and German records for completeness. Yet another convenient avoidance of a complicated negotiation by otherwise disinterested State functionaries.

                Liked by 1 person

  23. czarowniczy says:

    If war is the ultimate failure of diplomacy and Hillary was our ultimate diplomat, what does that say about he potentials as president? Autocomplete wanted to have her as ‘dip’ instead of ‘diplomat’, maybe it’s finally coming around to our side…

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Pingback: Who’s Responsible For Libya? |

  25. Trump correct again the Middle East was destabilized. ISIS did not exist before hillary/obama started regime changes. He is also correct about who we are aiding. They knew because the so called moderates pledged allegiance to al-Qaeda from the get go. Worse yet they went in there under false claims and John McShame was in on it. You know who warned about this? Michelle Bachman.

    Exclusive: Secret tapes undermine Hillary Clinton on Libyan war

    New analysis of rocket used in Syria chemical attack undercuts U.S. claims

    Syria intervention plan fueled by oil interests, not chemical weapon concern

    At the helm of the new energy diplomacy effort is Carlos Pascual, a former American ambassador to Ukraine, who leads the State Department’s Bureau of Energy Resources. The 85-person bureau was created in late 2011 by Hillary Rodham Clinton, the secretary of state at the time, for the purpose of channeling the domestic energy boom into a geopolitical tool to advance American interests around the world.

    ‘Vetted Moderate’ Free Syrian Army Commander Admits Alliance with ISIS, Confirms PJ Media Reporting

    Syrian rebels defy US and pledge allegiance to jihadi group

    U.S. Representative Michele Bachmann, a Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, said she had not been aware that the panel had agreed the White House could move forward.

    “It was made to look as though there is a quote ‘consensus’ of the committee,” she told Reuters. “I did not agree to this in any way.”

    Bachmann predicted U.S. support would end up aiding Islamist rebel groups that are sympathetic to al Qaeda.

    “And now we’re actually going to overtly, intentionally, fund jihadists?” she said. “This is beyond madness.”


  26. “Roller Derby by three vicious girl hawks instead of guys who are General Grade officers and spent their life trying to protect “America” and keep it out of big time trouble. Stalin was the “Social chairman” and Susan Ricer made the U.N. Ambassador a similar “Club”. Then out of shadows came Samantha Power. All three ladies of “pain” are girl “Martin Bormans” . They all have the imagination of a “Movie Doorman!” Mrs. Clinton is an old hawk that wants to hunt like an Eagle


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s