Apparently there are more than a few curious minds who have caught on to the Scheme Team concept of “Manufactured Media Evidence”.

Back in 2012 we first discovered the term “Media Evidence”; a rather odd twist on terminology generally used when outlining the discovery of fact in a pre-trial investigation of unlawful activity.

However, in 2012 two civil rights attorney’s, Daryl Parks and Benjamin Crump, coined the phrase as they needed to bring pressure on local Florida officials for an arrest in the Trayvon Martin shooting.
Facing a Police Chief, Bill Lee, who was stating (March 12th 2012) nothing existed in the investigation to dispute the self defense statements of George Zimmerman; and against the local prosecutor, Norm Wolfinger, also espousing the same judicial issues, Parks and Crump needed something, anything, to support their pleas for an arrest.
Media Evidence is not factually evidence per se’, it’s more of a constructed storyline -made to give the appearance of fact- so that a consuming legacy media will continue to advance their goals of arrest.   In 2012 Ear Witness #8, then sold as the anonymous “Dee Dee” -girlfriend of Trayvon Martin- provided the best example of constructing media evidence.
“Dee Dee”, sold on March 20th 2012 as a 16-year-old, puppy love, since kindergarten, devastated and hospitalized ear witness to the shooting death of Trayvon Martin, was purely “Media Evidence”.
The reality was: Witness #8 being Rachel Jeantel; an 18-year-old non-girlfriend, whom Trayvon had met three times since their introduction -a mere three weeks earlier (2/5/12)- at her eighteenth birthday party, and had no factual knowledge of the story being sold around her construction.
However, the national legacy media never questioned the Parks and Crump evidence, and so its use was successful.

So successful was the strategy, her mere presence within the narrative became the entire foundation for a probable cause affidavit for arrest.
This, despite the investigators (Gilbreath and O’Steen), from the office of Jacksonville Special Prosecutor Angela Corey, taking a sworn statement from Witness #8 without ever asking for her id. Hence the plausible deniability regarding her age, status, and factual personage. I digress.
Fast forward to 2014 and the same Attorney’s Daryl Parks and Benjamin Crump are up to their old tricks.
This time the “Media Evidence” is a manufactured autopsy, conducted under the most mysterious and auspicious of circumstances, yet sold to the consumption public by the New York Times and Frances Robles.
Ironically, or, well, perhaps not so much, Robles being the same seller of the DeeDee story two and a half years earlier.
Here’s the play.
On Friday August 15th, in response to the Ferguson Police releasing the strong-arm robbery video, Daryl Parks held a press conference.   During the conference Mr. Parks was asked a question about his organizing a 2nd autopsy of the body of “Big Mike” Brown.   He responded thusly:

…”it’s done, and we’ll talk about that later, we’re not answering any questions about the second autopsy at this time; we will -in time- do that”….

However, when they released the autopsy as ‘media evidence’ the night of Sunday 8/17, to the New York Times (Robles), the autopsy was conducted by Shawn Parcells and Dr. Michael Baden.   As the Times outlines Dr. Baden flew in to Saint Louis on 8/17 to perform the task.
Well obviously we’ve got a problem.   How can the second autopsy be complete prior to Friday 8/15, if Dr. Baden didn’t arrive until Sunday 8/17 ?
The legacy media and the New York Times obviously didn’t question the disparity, so we wrote about it HERE hoping to bring in the sunlight.
A pathology blog, already holding previous concerns about the use of unlicensed, uncertified and untrained Shawn Parcells, picked up the issue we outlined and contacted Mr Parcells for clarification.

[…]  Obviously this is a very serious allegation, especially in such a high profile case such as this, and I wanted to give Mr. Parcells a chance to respond.  I called and left a message on his voice mail, and he called me back within five minutes.

Mr. Parcells readily admitted he went to St. Louis a few days prior to Dr. Baden’s arrival so as to help the Brown family’s attorneys with some administrative matters.

While he was there, he learned the mortuary where Mr. Brown’s body was being held was planning to embalm him due to the fact it did not have a cooler in which to store the body.

Mr. Parcells stated he did take some photographs of Mr. Brown’s body and injuries in order to document the appearance of the gunshot wounds prior to embalming since the embalming process can alter gross findings.

But Mr. Parcells was emphatic Dr. Baden, who did review the pre-embalming photographs Mr. Parcells took, was physically present and conducted the official second forensic examination of Mr. Brown’s body on August 17th.

Mr. Parcells then asked me to look at an image of the preliminary autopsy diagram he and Dr. Baden put together, which is below (click to enlarge).

However, despite the New York Times, CBS, Washington Post, and Associated Press calling Shawn Parcells a “forensic pathologist”, he’s not.   Not even close.

[…]  After Mr. Parcells described himself as a “forensic pathologist assistant and medical investigator”, Dr. Mitchell says:

That is a degree that does not exist in my knowledge, except in the mind of Shawn Parcells…You cannot claim the title, because it is a formal, licensable position. You can assist somebody; in this way I can say, for instance, I have paid my taxes, so I am an assistant President of the United States…He has none of the qualifications that are required. He has experience as a morgue technician, somebody who would move bodies around, clean up after an autopsy…

To his credit, Mr. Parcells admitted he is not certified as a pathologist assistant, but rather he is qualified due to his experience working under Dr. Young.

To this Dr. Young responded:

Shawn hung out at the Jackson County Medical Examiner’s office but was not trained by me.”…. “He has been representing himself in a way that is not appropriate by giving forensic pathology opinions when he is not qualified to do so.

So, it would appear, if we are to reconcile the Daryl Parks statement, an unlicensed guy who “hung out at the Jackson County Medical Examiners office“, named Shawn Parcells, was given instructions by Parks and Crump to do a 2nd autopsy, which they now claim was only pictures and preliminary autopsy work, prior to the arrival of Dr. Michael Baden, who would do the “real second autopsy”, now technically the 3rd, a few days later.
Both ‘hang out guy’ Parcells, and Dr. Baden signed off on the autopsy diagram.
A diagram which, after they signed, was then manipulated by Parks and crump to give the appearance of another injury to the back and inner aspect of the right arm – therefore selling their media narrative of evidence for a shot from the rear.

This, we call, the mysterious “Red Mark” noticed during the live media broadcast – which is absolutely not present in either the original diagram, or the diagram published in the accompanying New York Times article.
OK, got it ?
This is how the factual construct of an official autopsy, is spun inside the blender of Daryl Parks and Benjamin Crump, and now officially becomes, ta da’, Media Evidence.
But why would Dr. Baden go along with the ruse and risk his “credibility”?   A question raised by some, but within the pathological community (‘forensic’ intentionally omitted), a question long ago since answered and recently encapsulated:

You folks who are old enough to remember the murder of Nicole Brown Simpson will know the name. He was a well respected forensic pathologist who began selling his services and his testimony to the highest bidder.

He is the “expert” who testified for O.J. Simpson, then, when questioned by the media about his testimony claimed he hadn’t said what he said on the stand. Baden also “testilied” for the defense in the murder trial of music mogul Phil Specter.

But hey, his wife was Specter’s defense attorney. What would you do to keep peace in the family?

We wouldn’t have hired someone with those sorts of questionable ethics, but the Brown family can do what they want while they have someone else paying the freight and looking for a big payout later.

Baden tells Fox News that Brown was shot six times, four times in the right arm, twice in the head, and one of those wounds was in the top of the head. Interesting. Every time a black thug is shot by police we are treated to statements like “He didn’t deserve to die like that. They could have shot him in the leg or something.” Well, it seems this officer did just that by putting four rounds into Brown’s right arm. Brown kept coming. The wound to the top of the head indicates Brown was likely still charging at the officer when he caught that one.

The race hustlers haven’t quite figured out how to spin that fact yet. Don’t worry, they will figure out something with the help of Dr. Baden. They are trying hard, though.

They held a press conference this morning claiming those six wounds support the stories told by “witnesses”. Um, yeah, not so much. They hope you will concentrate solely on the number of rounds fired and forget all those other aspects of the “witness” statements where they claimed Brown was standing there with his hands in the air and other nonsense not supported by the Fact family.

You can claim Parcells and Baden reviewed Parcells earlier work and then did the autopsy again – together on 8/17.   But given what we know of the historical track record another plausible situation is just as possible:   The guy who hung around the mortuary, Parcells, did the make shift autopsy, and Baden flew in and signed off on it solely to give it credibility.
And in regard to the “top of head shot” that’s drawn so much attention from the Parks and Crump camp, we’d like to draw your attention to an almost identical shot pattern fired last year by FBI officers as they were charged by another thug, Ibragim Todashev.

See how incredibly similar the forensics are between Mike Brown and Boston Bombing accomplice Ibragim Todashev – HERE.
Almost identical shot pattern which is the specific result of a person charging toward the police.