Theater of the Absurd
You just can’t make this stuff up.
The attorney, the civil attorney Benjamin Crump, the Martin family hired to pursue financial justice against various interests in the Trayvon Martin shooting is now fighting to stop his deposition about the circumstances surrounding the very witness, “DeeDee” (W8) that he identified to create the arrest affidavit that frames the entire cause for financial justice, vis-a-vi arrest/trial, which lead to the civil claims he desires, and are contained in the probable cause affidavit.
Talk about ridiculous circular logic.
Subsequently, the attorney representing and attempting to hide Benjamin Crump, now argues the defense is not asserting any affirmations of contradictions between the initial phone interview with Crump and DeeDee (ABC March 19th Broadcast), and the statement she gave to the State of Florida in her affidavit April 2nd [page 4 footnote #7].
This is their assertion, despite the fact the State of Florida refuses to disclose the identity of Witness 8 (DeeDee) who was a 16-year-old minor on March 19th per Crump, and mysteriously became an 18-year-old young woman on April 2nd per the State of Florida, to the defense.
So in essence the State is claiming they have no responsibility to disclose the Witness against the defendant (he cannot face his accuser) and simultaneously the person who interviewed her and brought her to the State has no responsibility to discuss her claim or identity; And because they have no responsibility to provide the information the defendant cannot discover the contradictions, the absence of which frame their assertion, because he is not permitted to know what she claimed, nor depose the person she made the claims to.