BREAKING TONIGHT – The Supreme Court has announced [LINK HERE and LINK HERE] it will hold a special hearing next month to consider challenges to the Biden administration’s vaccine mandate for large employers and a separate coronavirus vaccine mandate for health-care workers.
Both vaccine mandates have been partially blocked from going into effect by lower courts after challenges from states, business and religious coalitions.
Justices Alito and Kavanaugh both received requests, both affirmed acceptance, and then both cases were consolidated by THE COURT. The court will hear oral arguments for one hour on Friday January 7, 2022, just before the court begins regularly scheduled oral arguments. [SCOTUS Order Link]
Additionally, earlier today a Florida judge blocked the federal contractor mandate writing in part:
“The extent of any absenteeism attributable to COVID-19 among contractors and subcontractors is unexplained. The frequency and duration of any procurement delay attributable to COVID-19 is unexplained. The extent of any cost increases attributable to COVID-19 is unexplained.”
“In other words, the extent of any procurement problem, past or future, attributable to COVID-19 is undemonstrated and is merely a hastily manufactured but unproven hypothesis about recent history and a contrived speculation about the future. Obviously, no massive extension and expansion of presidential power is necessary to cure a non-existent problem and certainly neither ‘good cause’ nor ‘urgent and compelling circumstances’ exists to justify summary disregard of the requirements of administrative law and rulemaking.”
~ U.S. District Judge Steven Merryday 12/22/21
U.S. District Judge Steven Merryday granted a motion filed by Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody for a preliminary injunction against the vaccine requirement for federal contractors in Florida.
The arguments should be simple:
(1) There was no office-safety issue. OSHA did not suggest a mandate; they were given instructions from the WH to find a way to make a mandate.
(2) Further proof that this is abusive and not based on actual workplace safety is that already-immune people are still subject to the mandate.
(3) It is now proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that being vaccinated has NOTHING to do with being able to spread COVID at work.
How could such a case lose…unless the people arguing the case are complete dimwits that argue precedents from 1910?
Even the oft cited precedent from 1910, said that a STATE could mandate a vaccine, because STATES are recognised to have “plenary police powers” and it is equally recognised and long established legal doctrine, that the Federal govt has NO “plenary Police powers”.
In fact, its right there IN the decision from the 1910 case, IIRC.
It SHOULD be an easy call, but then Obummercare SHOULD have been an easy call, too.
Roberts ate some mushrooms, reveled at thec”penumbras and emanations” coming off of the Constitution, and found a Tax that the Obama admin insisted wasn’t THERE, so,…who knows?
The case is Jacobson vs. Massachusetts from 1905.
And even the decision in that case DID NOT COMPEL Jacobson to be vaccinated – Jacobson paid a $5.00 fine.
$5 was a heck of a fine in 1910, though.
I’m sure somewhere in the CBO someone is trying to figure out just HOW much in 2021, right now.
At 3 percent inflation the amount doubles very 24 years. $5 is probably about $140 today.
That is true BUT the courts allowed Mr. Jacobson to pay a FINE and STATE Government involved accepted that remedy.
Again, the State Government involved has legal basis for their mandate because it was supported by legislated law.
But this is not a legitimate “vaccine.” They’re moving the goalposts and redefining the terminology to suit their agenda. No one knows if these potions are “safe and effective,” and by now we see that they are neither. When states mandated polio, smallpox, mumps and rubella vaccines, first of all they WERE vaccines, and we had reason to be confident that they were safe and effective. We dutifully recorded every adverse reaction and found them to be very rare. The inoculations did dramatically lower the incidence of these once-deadly “childhood diseases.”
Mike, we have been though this before. All you and others state based on public knowledge and expert information means ZERO unless presented in court to challenge the governments basis for applying “Public Good and Safety” arguments.
Until presented in court, this Federal Court will play the 3-Monkey’s routine (blind-deaf-dumb) with respect to information NOT presented in court. This is the biggest single failure to date, by design or what ever reason, for cases requesting the injunctions. It has to be proven the mandates ARE NOT serving the Public Good and Safety.
You are way off base…
The 1905 Jacobson Precedent is misapplied if used to Justify a Federal Mandate.
The 1905 Jacabson Case involved a “legislated” mandate. The US Congress has NOT legislated, therefore the use of this precedent “should” NOT be allowed by the courts to support a FEDERAL Mandate.
States where a governor has issued a mandate supported by that states legislature cannot be over turned except by election of a new legislature that publishes a change to the law … OR … the mandate is shown via scientific and statistical evidence to NOT be serving the public good and safety.
Exactly -no law is on the books from the legislative branch! This should be cut and dry!!! But these crooked judges look for crap to rebuke. I bet they say states have the right but not feds. Just once again letting smaller crooked lib courts decide.
They had ‘something’ on Roberts and threatened him with – or he got weak in the knees – and figured that this was such a significant thing that the courts should not rule upon it – forgetting that the Supreme Court only receives significant things to decide. . . .
Yup, Thanks George W. freaking moron.
Roberts is another shining example of why I often say most conservatives unfortunately identify as republicans but very few Republicans are actually conservative.
I have no idea how any principled conservative sides with that party. Progressive neocons run amuck!
Opening the door to OSHA, a relatively new Office of A New Department not specifically stated in the US Constitution, opens the door to the 4th branch of the government, the Administrative branch. This is where the unelected will produce mountains of regulations for the sheeple to follow. We need much less government, not more.
And how about Florida that never implemented any mandate or lockdown and has the lowest case count in the nation?
Remember, it’s safe for the justices to side with the left-wing crew behind the fake president. And it’s way harder to challenge the corrupt financial and political interests behind the vaccine mandate and no one is going to pat them on the head for that. So whoever argues this case must make it impossible for the justices to pretend not to know anything about Florida.
If my life and livelihood are ended because I refuse the poison, I no longer have anything to lose.
Exactly right…once the poison is injected under your skin, there is no way to get it out.
Fight like your the third Monkey trying to get on Noah’s ark…and damn it, if it isn’t starting to rain….
Likewise if it is ended because you did accept it …
Seems reasonable to review this:
Fifth Amendment, U.S. Constitution
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
What due process is afforded to the unvaccinated to justify being deprived of liberty and property, possibly life? In the event that an individual already has natural immunity, he/she is in a superior position to a hundred vaccines. Where is the due process there? In this situation, which is to say, reviewing the necessity of an injunction, a necessary element is that the citizens suffer “irreparable harm,” which means cannot be compensated by money.
Given that we are dealing with a basic fundamental right enshrined in our Constitution, the rule must be narrowly tailored to support a compelling government interest (so called strict scrutiny standard). It cannot logically be tailored where the natural immunity is ignored and cannot be a compelling government interest when the vaccinated hemorrhage the illness to others. So; if the Supremes do not strike this nonsense, I think you can safely conclude the fix is in. What then are your Constitutionally guaranteed rights then?
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”
Except it’s not applied especially to the poor Jan 6th innocent ppl in jail for months!!!!
We the People MUST Withdraw our Consent! In every manner. Respect for politicians and bureaucrats, enforcement personnel, unjust laws and regulations – “nullification” – and most importantly, STOP PAYING TAXES. STARVE THIS BEAST. All authority for governance flows from us.
Read an interesting, and foreboding comment, on the thread at Legal Insurrection. The person makes an excellent point:
What the SC has done without issuing a stay on the 6th circuit is to tell all the businesses that represent some 80 million workers to keep proceeding in setting up your policies around testing and vaccinations as if the SC is going to rule against them. The petitioners had specifically asked for a stay which the SC denied. If there was 5 votes to overturn the 6th circuit, they would have issued the stay to give some relief to all the businesses while they wait for the case to be argued on Jan 7th.
PROOF THAT KAVANAUGH AND BARRETT ARE DEEP STATE SCUM, NOT QUALIFIED TO SIT ON ANY COURT, LET ALONE SCOTUS.
Bingo. You know what the outcome will be. The WEF and Davos elites own all 3-branches right now, and the 4th branch works directly for them.
I read something similar on reddit. Lockdown Amy will vote to uphold any vaccine mandate or oppressive covid measures the government comes up with. And Kavanaugh is a rino squish. Roberts votes with the liberals on any issues of importance.
thats not how it works … they don’t issues stays because they have “5 votes” …
The Jan 7 hearing is about the stay in both cases, not the full merits. The OSHA deadline was moved to the 10th with the real deadline being Feb 9th, so the 7th in this case doesn’t change anything. Note that they also did not lift an existing stay in place in half the states already for the Medical one.
I would’nt read much into this
So, this Judge is saying Brandon is full of it, when he says the supply chain disruptions are because of Covid, in addition to blocking the mandate?
Lovin it, but suspect in SCOTUS, Roberts will write the decision, declaring it a tax.
Actually, if SCOTUS declare the mandates UnConstitutional, because of procedural issues, that DOESN’T end the issue of mandates.
States could continue to issue mandates, municipalities could as well, and so could businesses.
Unless the SCOTUS decision is broadly written, even if the declare Brandons mandates Unconstitutional, …it may be a pyhric victory.
And yes, I am sure they are lieing, and a lot of the vax is getting tossed cause it ain’t being used.
And, in addition to many saying no to any vax, I think there are many who took the first, but are not going for boosters.
37 percent of truckers not only said “No”, but “Hell No!”.
With the trucking industry currently 80,000 drivers shy, even if only 3.7 percent refused to take the shot, and so were sidelined it would be DEVASTATING to the country.
And bear in mind, the remaining drivers CAN NOT WORK OVERTIME, to fill in the gap, like with many jobs.
I don’t see many responding “Hell No” as relenting, they KNOW they have the power, and they are gonna USE it.
If they are anything like me, the ones who respond “HELL no” are guided by a Divine Light that delivers them from evil. In other words, they will remain fully human or they will die trying.
Why is the border still open ?
I have yet to hear any news outlets or talk show hosts mention the fact that the illegals do not have to get vaccinated. Whenever someone asks me when I will get the Vaccine I tell them it will be when every illegal is vaccinated.
I plan on self identifying as an illegal alien😂😂
China needs to sell Fentanyl.
I guess 100 thousand drug overdoses in 2021 isn’t enough.
Why is natural immunity being ignored?
Because they have purposely not studied it, so they can avoid it’s existence.
Because these mRNA “gene editing” injections have nothing to do with viral transmission.
The Supreme Court has been bought by the Global Communists. There is no way that they will stand up and do the right thing by the US Constitution. They will crumble faster than a soiled pair of Joe Biden’s Depends diapers. The mandates will lead to mass unemployment, the destruction of the supply chain and the American Economy. This is exactly what the Communists who run Biden want to happen. Millions will be homeless. Eventually the people will rise up and there will be bloody conflicts. Biden will send in the military and Red Constitutional States will try to Secede. This will lead to a Civil War.
So they are not really scared of “riots”? I figured that was a ruse.
Regarding the failed “justice” Roberts and his irrational “it’s a tax, shazayyam!!” commie-care ruling –
In the case of this Franken-jab-mandate, this mandate is an edict issued by: an old white guy.
Where commie-care was kinda-sorta legislation pushed by a Sacred-Cow-Religious-Idol: the first black president.
Roberts could not exist in the District of Corruption if he was seen as opposing the Sacred-Cow-Religious-Idol.
But – oppose an old white guy ? ? . . . well, you know . . . that is in fashion . . .
Picture of the Chief Justice of the United States of America along with article:
https://www.businessinsider.com/chief-justice-john-roberts-malta-photo-2012-7
https://i.insider.com/4ff364ccecad049977000004?width=700&format=jpeg&auto=webp
Can’t get any more in your face than this!!!!!!
Anti-climax. This court will never deny the Progressive imperium on issues of such importance. Kavanaugh and Barrett are the guarantors of this.
Let them make their laws, I am done with it.
I have no confidence in this Roberts/McConnell Rino court.
The Supreme Court has lost respect among the General populace. If the Supremes don’t come out on the side of our rights as free individuals in a free country, then you’ll know for sure that our government has been completely taken over by Communists.
I’m quite certain of it right now.
No doubt the OSHA mandate is a violation of our bill of rights found in the constitution. How can unelected bureaucrats make such a mandate defies logic. Soon we shall see if our constitutional republic remains based on the decision of the Supreme Court. If they allow the mandate like they did the election cheating the court is obviously all in on the agenda.
“If they allow the mandate like they did the election cheating the court is obviously all in on the agenda.”
If by “agenda” you mean UN’s Agenda 2021 “Great Reset” New/ One World Order genocide, I believe you are right on the money.
Doesn’t matter. The Supreme Court can rule against the rights and freedoms of the people. And we the people can simply ignore them and demand our rights. You want workers? Fine, get rid of your mandate. Won’t be taking this jab for anyone. It’s my body, my choice, and I don’t bow down to bullies and dictators.
I have lost confidence in the ability of Brett to be reasonable and a constitutionalist.
This Supreme Court is corrupted. Its corruption appears to me to be the ability of Marxists and Progressives (I repeat myself purposely) to intimidate the Court with the spectre of court packing. I believe this is not because certain persons on the Court or in its federal administration are opposed to Court packing but rather because John Roberts is determined that the packing of the Court not be his personal legacy as this current Supreme Court Justice. Yes, I believe that decisions made by this Court notably the Obamacare mandate and the recent decisions around the 2020 election result from the manipulation of Coney Barrett and Kavanaugh by Roberts who has convinced them that their near compromise of their values regarding Federalism is necessary to “save the Republic”. This insidious abdication of their oaths to defend our Republic in fact ultimately I fear will result in widespread bloodletting and death. I know this may seem hyperbolic but it’s not. When you declare that Texas does not have standing to sue Pennsylvania for that state’s violation of its own state constitution which then effectively gamed the electoral college and consequently disenfranchised Texas in the election of the only elected federal official by states you have gutted the entire pact that created the damn Republic in the first place. This was clearly an abdication by the Supreme Court of its most foundational role: the preservation of the construction of our country as a Constitutional Republic as a pact between sovereign states. I predict the Supreme Court despite clear constitutional violations and the lack of any coherent relationship to a crises of grave danger will affirm this OSHA regulation. I predict then that Mayors all across our country will violate the Constitution by banning people from public spaces. I predict that Biden’s evil ones will then extend the regulation to all employers. I predict that then certain Governors will restrict interstate travel. Folks hold on because this is about to get bumpy. And also know that the “grave danger” in the regulation is specifically defined as the “grave danger” to the unvaccinated thereby instituting that the vaccinated are not at grave risk. Then ask yourself why your employer is tasked with protecting you from the “grave risk” of a personal medical decision that the government has determined affects only you and not your coworkers. And then ask yourself why your fat coworkers, your coworkers who have DUI convictions or your coworkers are in physically abusive relationships aren’t mandated to lose weight, test every day for substance abuse or leave their abusive relationships. Ask yourself where this stops and who decides where it stops and the sheer politicization of our personal autonomy becomes clear. This is a present danger to our freedoms that must be appreciated and halted.
And I understand that the Obamacare mandate case predated Coney Barrett and Kavanaugh, but it nevertheless is an example of Roberts compromised nature and was the first decision that struck me as indicative of it. And for those of you who disagree with me understand that I fervently hope that I am wrong and you are right because the future I hope for for my children and grandchildren is the future you predict and not the one I predict.
Does anyone remember that all of this is being done under “emergency use authorization” and in spite of the fact that other treatments DO exist? (Hence making the grant illegal.)
Has anyone read the sections of 21USC and 10USC which plainly say that you can give informed consent OR REFUSE for any or no reason?
The sections which say that you must not be coerced, suffer negative consequences or any threats of the same? Mandates are illegal, particularly at the federal level.
EUA, like the emergency provisions of the OSHA act, were intended for genuinely dire situations where there is literally no other option: a situation that clearly does not exist here and never did. Big Pharma has created a giant loophole through which to sell, very soon, more than a TRILlion dollars worth of sometimes-deadly, untested potions without the time and expense of clinical trials which they probably could never pass. It is blatantly ILLEGAL, and their legal immunity should be voided.
There is no “medical emergency” here. There never was.
There are 179 US Circuit Courts and 670 US District Courts. Appointments are confirmed by senate, serve (?) for life, and are groomed by NGO Federalist Society. Sheldon Whitehouse is despicable, but this analysis may be correct.
https://www.whitehouse.senate.gov/news/speeches/the-third-federalist-society
You mean these judges are “confirmed” by the same crooks who install themselves in DC via election fraud against the will of the people? THAT Senate?
Here’s the fastest way to bring this to a full stop: declare that “EUA” was illegally granted – and it was – so Big Pharma no longer has magical legal immunity. The lawsuits will fly and the programs will immediately stop.
The potions can only be distributed after successful completion of a REAL clinical trial. You will never hear of them again: way too many dead ferrets.
This was never about a virus Mike. The virus is only a means to an END.
I don’t hold out much hope for the carcass of what was once our Supreme Court. Do they even know we are a Constitutional Republic? Or do they legislate from the bench like all the rest?
The “Supremes” are either in fear for their lives (who wouldn’t be), fatally compromised by Leftist ideology or deluded by mass formation lunacy.
Americans keep on waiting for some Knight in shining armor to *save* us from tyranny. First it was the Republican Party, then it was President Trump, then the US military and all those assorted alphabet agencies.. none were able to complete the task at hand.
President Trump did drain the swamp, as promised, to expose all those slithering swamp critters. But the free world has yet to crawl out from under their enormous, global tentacles.
Look to Austria, Australia, etc.. to see what’s in store for USA if we don’t snap out of our collective stupor.
WE are the knight in shining armor we’re waiting for.
Destroying this ever growing tyranny is OUR RESPONSIBILITY. No one else can. And it requires blood be shed.
I didn’t make those rules. They’re as old as history and written in the human genome.
We have not been a constitutional republic since 1865. Right or wrong on why that war was fought, the prevailing side took advantage of the situation to destroy any hope of that republic ever returning. In turn they ushered in a new age of administrative law. We are no longer citizens of our state and residents of the United States, but vice versa.
We have been in a progressive tail spin ever since. Both parties are riddled with that ideology.
Good men will have to do very bad things to ever have a chance of restoring that idea. Because you will can not “out vote” this type of thing.
Spoken from the standpoint of tough love for country… We have to let go of these romantic fantasies and accept where we are if we’re ever going to eventually find that starting point.
I’m not going to hold my breath over this one.
Perhaps the Supremes will be able to find the Article and Clause that grants the Federal Government the authority to mandate a vaccine.
My copy of the Constitution doesn’t include the words “medicine”, “Medical Care”, “vaccine”, “doctor”, “healthcare”, or anything close to those. Maybe mine is faulty?
My copy of the constitution says that the Supreme kangaroo court can’t legally make laws.
That’s for the legislative branch.
The Covid “vaccine” is not a vaccine.
It does not protect people from getting Covid or transmitting it.
Hope the Supreme Court can help us to define what Biden’s team wants to forcefully inject in our bodies.
It’s not a vaccine.
The vaccine is under an emergency authorization. It cannot be mandated. The only one approved is Comernity, which is not available in the United States. If it were in the IS, the EU for the other vaccines would have to be rescinded. This is all bait and switch unlawful nonsense for a make-believe problem.
The problem, and I’m not talking about “covid”, is far from make believe.
The federal contract I work on had to be amended to include the FJB Executive Order in September for the vax mandate.
Luckily, I filed a religious exemption which was accepted by my employer.
My question is, will companies still honor the contract mods even though there is a stay on that EO? What happens if the SCOTUS gets a backbone and affirms the stay? I would think those contract mods are invalid should that happen.
Praying for the mandates to fade into the sunset, as I have family that are holding out from taking the jab who are federal contractors.
I guess vaccine matters more than voter fraud? Or maybe the Supreme Court is a sham like all other authorities in laws and enforcement? Im going on the latter considering past recent history. It’s salve on a wound of civil war.
They already lost. The rope has been strung. The noose waits patiently.
Yes, it may be many of us, still I hold history to her standards.
See, we have to be told and it be “bonafide” by the Supreme Court to makes us understand how “right” it is to lose our freedoms.
Not that we see or understand, few, understand.
Read some articles yesterday about parents who drop extremely sick kids at school.“They don’t have time to care for them.” Why did you bother then?
We expect that mind to make a decision on freedom?
Freedom means nothing left to lose, because forethought and history are lies, right?
God loves knowledge. He is wisdom and understanding.
It’s not as if we cannot see God, or hear him. We ignore him, just like that manual on the nightstand.
“Love thy neighbor” has no tolerance for evil. It does no justice to the perpetrators or the victims.
God is love, yet your choice is eternal. So, why are we hesitant in matters of freedom? Truth?
The manual is not harsh or judgmental, it is absolute truth. Wouldn’t an unmovable foundation be a place to start?
Please politician, reference your decision in the manual. Just once!
Please mr. Reporter man, what reference in the manual where it says this is ‘ok’ in any manner? How lies can achieve life.
In all this, there is a blessing. Not hidden.
You can see the absolute hate that permeates our society.
Where we plant seed is obvious.
How is not worth debating.
The law in California requires ““State of emergency” means the duly proclaimed existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state” – you tell me if ther was EVER Extreme peril to anyone in California from a disease that even back in April 2020 was killing less than 1% of those afflicted.
This is all crap. Force the government to demonstrate some facts – and then argue that having or two people out every month is a significant risk to production. Lawyers and Judges tend to have logical brains – and prove when someone asserts a conclusion if key to that analysis – your statement is a conclusion – show me the FACTS to back up the conclusion and we shall see if your conclusion is thus reasonable.
Thats all the courts have to do is put the government to its facts – not its conclusions.
I am a common man of no particular training. But I’m reasonably well read and self educated.
This is all coming to a frightening head to me as my eldest son is about to acquiesce to the “vaccine” in order to be able to keep working in his field, the hospitality industry.
I have penned a letter I will send to each Supreme Court justice.
You’re all a bunch of smart people here. I am looking for guidance and editing.
Much appreciated.
Bob
—————————————–
Dear Justice
I have read that you are going to take up the case of the Presidential mandate for corporations of over 100 employees to require their employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment on January 7, 2022.
Only a “legal scholar” could misunderstand the following:
If “secure in their persons” applies to searches and seizures, how much more must it apply to bodily autonomy; if I am not secure from the State forcing compliance, either directly or by proxy, with being forced to consume any substance in any manner, then I truly have no Rights.
Our Rights come from our Creator and, it follows, are superior to all law and the Constitution. It is MY Right, and only my Right, to control what medicines or other substances I will take or refuse. There is no other authority on this matter.
Many labor and employee groups, postal workers come to mind as one, have been granted exemptions to compliance with these vaccine mandates. This is the antithesis to the concept of equal protection and, further, invalidates any mandate that would force involuntary or coerced vaccination, whether directly or by proxy.
Any action by any agency, judicial or governing body that seeks to compel a Citizen to take a vaccine or medicine s/he does not want to, by virtue of the argument provided above, is in violation of 18 USC 242 “Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law”.
Further, any agency, judicial or governing body that coerces a Citizen to accept this or any vaccination, particularly one that is not approved but used only under an “EUA” emergency use authorization is in violation of the Nuremberg Code.
Both the USC statute and the Nuremberg Code call for harsh penalties for violators, up to and including execution.
As a Sovereign Citizen and Free Man, I would advise careful deliberation and deep contemplation of the Principles involved and the History of those Principles in deciding your position on this matter before you. This may well be the most pivotal point in Human History of the last three thousand years.
I actually had a dream that the vote came in to block this mandate. I’ve been reading too much news.
2.5 conservatives and 6.5 progressives voting over the question of… Can the government can have more power?
I can think of a dozen prior cases to cite as justification to why this doesn’t end well…
Sounds like the judicial branch is getting ready to make some illegitimate laws again.
Time to get rid of the legislative branch and the state run media.
I want to know if the Supremes have taken the gubmint jab. One size fits all. Lol