We have been waiting patiently, for over two years, for a moment, a very specific moment, when it was possible to confirm previous suspicions.  Today is that day.

What outlines below is clear and convincing evidence the 2012 health event of Hillary Clinton resulted in a permanent compromise to Hillary Clinton’s vision.  What is outlined below is why some seemingly innocuous notations can reconcile.  We’ll also explain why the Clinton team cannot reveal the reality.

Back in October of 2012 the Hillary Clinton health story began around a cold, which became a flu, which became a slip and fall, which became a concussion…. which led to hospitalization for blood clots.
Pay close attention to the specifics here:

(Via Politico) […] She was discovered to suffer from “transverse sinus thrombosis” and began taking blood thinners to dissolve the clot. The concussion caused Clinton to suffer briefly with double vision, for which she wore glasses with a “Fresnel Prism.”

Those symptoms resolved within two months, Dr. Lisa Bardack said, and Clinton promptly dropped the glasses.

In 2013, a follow-up visit revealed “complete resolution of the effects of the concussion as well as total dissolution of the thrombosis,” Bardack said. She also tested negative for all blood clotting disorders, but remained on daily anticoagulation medication as a precaution. (read more)

Except we know, because of documented evidence, Hillary Clinton did not “drop the glasses”, she has been spotted wearing them recently. (more…)

A few days ago it was reported the non-citizen alien who killed five people in a Washington State mall was a frequent voter.
Last week a dead voter registration drive for Democrats was discovered in Colorado, this week it is Virginia.
Strange how we never hear a single case of “republican voter fraud“….

(Via WFB) A Virginia Young Democrat working for a Democrat-aligned voter registration group got caught filing applications on behalf of dead people when he filed an application for a deceased World War II veteran who was known by a local clerk.
Andrew Spieles, a James Madison University student working for HarrisonburgVotes, confessed earlier this month that he submitted 19 applications for deceased individuals, according to a report in the local Daily News-Record.

(more…)

Candidate Donald Trump will be holding a rally today in Novi Michigan at the Suburban Collection Showplace. Live stream coverage begins at 5:00pm EDT:
Live Stream Link – Alternate Live Stream #1 – Alternate Live Stream #2

(more…)

Fort Pierce is approximately 100 miles North of Coral Springs; both on the East coast of Florida. Fort Pierce is also the location of the mosque were Omar Mateen (Orlando terrorist) attended.
Seddique Mateen, Omar’s father, is a big supporter of Hillary Clinton, Fort Pierce is not as favorable toward her. Additionally, during her campaign stop in Fort Pierce today, Hillary Clinton’s ever-present two-year cough was pronounced:

(more…)

No set-up necessary.

I seem to remember a political candidate discussing this issue a few weeks ago. Previously candidate Donald Trump stated he would revoke visa privileges from any country who refused to accept repatriated U.S. deportations. Makes sense. Now this…
EL CAJON, Calif. — US authorities tried twice to deport the unarmed black man fatally shot by police in El Cajon, California, but his native Uganda refused to take him.

US Immigration and Customs Enforcement said Thursday in a statement to the Associated Press that Alfred Olango stopped reporting to officers in February 2015.  Spokeswoman Virginia Kice didn’t know if officers tried to find him after that. (more…)

It has been 10 days since we originally presented the Stonetear Revelations on September 19th.
Yesterday, Ohio Representative Jim Jordan questioned FBI Director James Comey about the “Stonetear” Reddit posting. Director Comey admits that Stonetear is in fact Paul Combetta, and the “VERY VIP” was, indeed, Hillary Clinton.
Additionally Director Comey also stated the phrase “they” in the Combetta post  (ie. “Basically, they don’t want the VIP’s email address exposed to anyone“…) most likely included Hillary Clinton’s legal team. Watch:

However, stunningly Comey appears almost disingenuous about the action of Paul Combetta (it makes no difference to Comey) where Combetta scrubbed the postings in an attempt to cover-up/hide the original intent of the document manipulation (Sept.20th).
When questioned about whether he would re-open the investigation given this information Comey gave no response.  Even more alarming is Comey admitting the influencing agents behind the request to Combetta were most likely Cheryl Mills and Hillary Clinton’s legal team during their conversations on July 23rd and 24th 2014.
How the heck can Comey sit there with a straight face and say there was no reason to prosecute any of the participants in the email scheme, when he’s now admitting they carried forethought into the process on July 24th (Stonetear), and Paul Combetta himself exhibited consciousness of guilt in his actions trying to scrub the traces of that forethought only 9 days ago?   BULLSH*T !!
(more…)

This should be interesting. Very interesting. I’m curious to see if Alicia Stanley’s story is included. After all, she was Trayvon’s actual mother. If there’s a book tour, I might have to go ask Fruit and Candy some questions…

(STORY HERE)

Fox News host Brit Hume is discussing the Clinton “conspiracy theories” tonight.  He identifies the “Cleaner” as long time Democrat strategist Brady Williamson who has been part of the debate negotiating team for decades.  Mystery solved.
Here’s a ‘slightly’ better video synopsis of the controversy:

Takeaways:
• Three or four individuals are removing items from the Clinton lectern after debate.
• There are at least 7 trips to the lectern (four by Brady Williamson) After debate.
• One of the trips (not Willamson ) removes a cup of water. The other six ?
• During each removal there is a person watching over.
• The last time Brady Williamson visits the lectern he is most likely putting something back, it appears to be a brown box, not necessarily taking something out.

Unfortunately, this post is going to be severely fragmented.  Our apologies in advance.  However, if anyone can clean up these videos please notify us ASAP in the comments. You’ll see what I mean.
Earlier during our initial review of the debate we identified something that looked entirely suspicious because it is only evidenced for one specific candidate, and one specific lectern. We initially drew attention to it as “The Cleaner”:

Well, this intrigue just got a whole lot more interesting.
(more…)