In the Gosnell trial today an unavoidable walk back showcases the reality of determination of life.

The judge walked back a previous ruling surrounding “Baby C”, reversing his previous ruling that a murder charge on “that child” could not progress.   Baby C was alive for 20 minutes when placed in a shoe box – before he died, so the judge ruled that one, was indeed, potentially, murder.

The HUMAN CREATED insanity of the challenge facing the judge is brutally obvious.   Which babies are actually babies, and which are not – the definition of “life” being fought in the courtroom.

The baby whose foot merely kicked as he tried to live is considered not eligible for legal protection.  The baby who breathed a little longer is……  what determines who qualifies and who does not?

A few breaths only and the baby can be discarded – but wiggle a bit more, breathe a little more, or fight a little harder…. and something changes.   What exactly is it that changes?  At what point does that change occur?  

These are the actual arguments taking place inside a Philadelphia courtroom.

Humanity screams so loudly – the voices of the attorney’s are irrelevant….  and I find myself filled with brutally painful tears for those who are dead under such definitions. (more…)

The union representing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers are suing DHS and Janet Napolitano because they are not enforcing the law.  The lawsuit stems from the Obama administration’s refusal to deport illegal aliens and their children.

A Federal Judge has now affirmed the obvious, DHS cannot just randomly choose which immigration laws to enforce, and which to avoid.

But think about this the next time you are in a challenging conversation with the progressive left – Has there ever been another modern President who needed to be sued, to follow the laws that were constitutionally written?  (more…)

Would you actually expect any less from the professional organization of U.S. Islamists…

It’s not a question of whether former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton lied, she did.   But, again we knew that at the time – the latest information from the Congressional Hearing report only confirms it.

The bigger question is what are they going to do about it?

WASHINGTON DC – House Republicans released their report on the investigation into the Benghazi terrorist attack, having concluded that then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was not telling the truth when she told Congress that she wasn’t aware that officials at the U.S. mission in Benghazi had requested extra security.

“The specific security requests pertaining to Benghazi, you know were handled by the security professionals in the department,” Clinton told Congress in January. “I didn’t see those requests, they didn’t come to me, I didn’t approve them, I didn’t deny them.”

The House report suggests that Clinton received a request for more security from Gene Cretz, who preceded Christopher Stevens as ambassador to Libya. (more…)

This story, today’s headline, and how the Treepers review it, is what makes the Treehouse different – As pointed out by Treeper Woohoowee the House Report is an example of presenting information “as if” the desire of the GOP is to reveal the Truth – It is NOT.   The GOP report completely skips the issues of 9/11, 9/12, 9/13 and 9/14 2012 and instead focuses on the “why did the administration change the narrative” beginning 9/15/12.

The congressional report completely skips the heart of the matter in a politically motivated attempt to rebut a series of known lies, misleading statements, and false claims.  In doing so, the report, and those who wrote it, do a horrid injustice to the quest for TRUTH.

However, we hold no predisposition of avoidance.

A Typical Media Report of the Congressional finding looks like this:  House Republicans have concluded that Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton was responsible for cutting security at the consulate in Benghazi ahead of last year’s attack there, and that the administration lied about why it downplayed terrorism as the cause of the assault. (more…)

Evil – Pure Evil….   Today the Philadelphia Judge in the Gosnell trial listened to the motion and argument from the abortion doctor’s defense lawyer.   An argument which included the following statement in the court record:

“If we are going in this room to say a baby is born alive because it moves one time without any other movement, that is ludicrous”…  [defense attorney Jack McMahon]

Which obviously begs the question:   If they were not “alive”, then why did Kermit need to cut their necks? (more…)

Floyd Corkins, the shooter who attempted a mass killing at the Family Research Council at the ideological behest of the SPLC, is on trial.    The government said, in making its recommendation  for 45 years in prison, that if not for the security guard’s actions, Corkins ‘would have almost  certainly succeeded in committing a massacre of epic portions.’

(Via Daily Mail) The sandwich-heavy contents of his backpack may look amusing, but government prosecutors are demanding that the Virginia man who attempted a killing spree at the Family Research Council last year deserves a 45 year sentence.

Floyd Corkins II entered the the Washington headquarters of the conservative Christian lobbying group in August with nearly 100 rounds of ammunition and 15 Chick-fil-A sandwiches stuffed in his bag as part of an elaborate plan to shoot as many people as possible. (more…)

(Via Fox News)  The U.S. Army is directing troops to remove a Bible inscription that a vendor etched into the serial numbers of weapon scopes, Fox News has learned.

Click image(s) to enlarge

Soldiers at Fort Wainwright in Alaska told Fox News they received a directive to turn in their scopes so the Bible references could be removed.

The scopes were made by Trijicom and referenced New Testament passages in John 8:12 and Second Corinthians 4:6. The verses appeared at the end of the scope serial numbers – “JN8:12” and “2COR4:6.” (more…)

Forward the video to the 1:10 second mark and watch the conversation.   Listen to the follow up question from Tamron Hall:

…..”what is the correct way to ask questions without offending Muslims“….

Absorb this conversation…..  I mean, REALLY let it settle in to your brain – It really is like a spotlight upon the mindset of the shadow dwellers.   In essence the conversation is:

…..how do we identify those who are trying to kill us, without actually identifying, or pointing out, the ones who are doing the killing….

This is the way the mind of a PROG actually works.   Seriously.   Just think about it. (more…)

STORY HERE