There are few, if any, positive aspects to the national spotlight and attention surrounding the George Zimmerman case. A review of mandatory minimum sentences could be one of those outcomes.
A new trial announced today in the case of Marissa Alexander. Spotlighting a prosecutorial charge put upon by Angela Corey, the 4th District State Attorney’s Office in Jacksonville Florida; and a mandatory 20 year minimum sentence imposed by the judge after conviction.
The case is controversial, not so much for the conviction, but more for the sentence.

Under Florida’s mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines Marissa Alexander was sentenced to TWENTY years in prison for firing a warning shot in her kitchen when her husband was confronting her. They had a troubled, at times violent, history together.
Good construction of the factual backstory HERE.
There are two sides to every story, and in this case the actual conviction –based on the evidence– as found by a jury, was correct. However, the sentencing was excessive based on the actual event. A sentence structured around a charge, and mandatory 10-20-life guideline when a firearm is used in the commission of a charged and convicted felony.
[excerpt from MSN News] … The 1st District Court of Appeal in Tallahassee said in Thursday’s ruling that the trial judge made a “fundamental error” when he instructed the jury that Alexander was required to prove self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt. (more…)