**Bumped By Request**
I have written, deleted, remained quiet and also absorbed frustration likely similar to many of you. Now, perhaps, it is worth presenting the brutal truth of the matter; or, as was said in my family, it’s time to call the baby ugly.
Since the resignation of Joe diGenova as counsel to U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche there have been many opinions shared. diGenova himself has given statements to some media outlets {NBC, non-paywall}. Other outlets have encapsulated with their customary spin {Citation}, and diGenova has also talked to others we might consider closer allied to a presentation of truth {source}.
As with all matters of significance, there are points missed, context missing, structural understandings that go beyond quick articles or soundbites. This is one of those examples. It’s highly likely the White House and Main Justice had a strong opinion about the pace of the South Florida effort and the lack of substantive action; I mean, aren’t we all? However, the root of the issue is one I am very familiar with, and with that in mind here’s the part that very few really understand.
If I had to give you the cliff notes version it would sound like this: Yes, the slowness is the problem, but the context is not entirely accurate. One of diGenova (and anyone else’s) problems, is that they don’t know the background material well enough. I have personally encountered this so much I no longer get frustrated; it just is what it is.
The investigators, prosecutors, inquisitors et al, spend too much time trying to figure out the storyline, and it is the storyline that is critical. Because, well, in brutal honesty, they don’t know it. They know it in a cursory fashion, at a high level; at a level of political talking points, media hits, clickbait headline discussion; but unfortunately, that’s not good enough for this case.
A granular level working knowledge of the specifics of Spygate and Russiagate are needed. That level of learning, understanding takes up so much time that it becomes almost impossible for them to act decisively and quickly. It is the complexity of the matter that becomes a self-fulfilling defense. Joseph diGenova was/is no exception. This is the central problem with all of these guys; they just don’t know the material well enough.
I’m not making excuses, I’m stating facts. Facts that are based upon my personal experience after almost a decade deep inside this issue.
That’s the cliff notes. If you want the full understanding, keep reading.
.
Right about here someone will likely ask, ‘well, why don’t you help them’? I’ll explain that also. It’s more complicated that you might think.
The one thing you must remember about exposing Washington DC corruption with Washington DC people is their primary prism. It took me a while to figure it out, but after a while of seeing the pattern, I realized their outlook is a feature of everyone.
Everyone associated with the system of exposing corruption, soup to nuts – everyone, comes into the matter with this outlook. They are deathly afraid of losing their personal credibility, while simultaneously they demand full credit for any resulting positive public opinion.
They are afraid of the story, but they want credit if it becomes mainstream. Now, think carefully about that for a moment, because it is the one common characteristic amid all of them. I repeat, all of them. No one wants the risk – Everyone wants the credit. This forms the baseline for what I am describing.
Joe diGenova wanted the job; he wanted to investigate Spygate/Russiagate and deliver accountability. However, diGenova was limited in the outset to the information he understood, which to his credit was more than most but still only at a surface level.
There are others like diGenova, and all carry the same challenge inherent within their ability.
What does this look like in real life? Well, when I have a conversation about the storyline of Spygate/Russiagate that originates back in 2015 (note with some small references to the previous 2011 IRS operation), it takes me about three hours to walk through the timeline of activity. If there are questions, that conversation can take another few hours. Let’s put the total at four hours just to be fair.
Four hours. That’s per person.
You start with the 2nd asst to the 1st asst of the primary. That’s 4 hours of explaining. Then you wait until you are given a meeting with the 1st asst of the primary. That’s another 4 hours explaining everything you previously explained. Then you wait again until the 2nd and 1st asst have explained to the primary. Then the initial background vetting takes place, just to make sure the storyline factually makes sense, and ensure you are not nuts. Then you may, maybe not, get to explain it all again to the primary. Another 4 hours, and the primary will have questions. If they don’t have questions, you are pissing in the wind and all effort to this point is time wasted.
Once the primary agrees on the merit of the storyline, then you are tasked to explain it to the designee of the primary who will then go look closer at the information you are citing, just to ensure the evidence of the citation you are referencing is factually accurate. Another four-hour outline and conversation. If that evidence is factually accurate, the designee of the primary then begins the process to capture it, declassify it, make it public, or add it to the list of evidence needed to continue.
If there are any other stakeholders in the process, they too will request the 4-hour explanation of why this matters.
Everything you just read can pertain to one, singular document; one singular point in the storyline. How many weeks just passed?
It took me eight months to convince around a dozen people of the need to review, retrieve, declassify, return and then ultimately release the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) transcript of testimony from former Intelligence Community Inspector General, Michael Atkinson. No one wants the risk – Everyone wants the credit.
[SIDEBAR: For a case study in ‘No one wants the risk – Everyone wants the credit’ look at John Solomon; who, in my personal opinion, was/is the biggest mistake by President Trump in the effort of transparency in Term-2. Special Govt Employee John Solomon is to White House transparency as Joe diGenova was to Main Justice accountability].
No one knows the granular details. No one fully understands the storyline, the connections, the matrix of names and activities, so nobody really knows where to look. Worse still, no one is willing to say, ‘we don’t know’ – until Tulsi Gabbard. DNI Tulsi Gabbard was the first person in a position of importance who was willing to walk into the situation admitting a lack of knowledge, yet wide open and enthusiastic to understand the specific issues.
No one wants the risk – Everyone wants the credit. This also applies to an odd fear of personal harm (or targeting) from understanding the issues. To me this is like being afraid of mythical dragons. Walk boldly in the light, be right with God and there is no sense of fear. However, I digress.
Please accept this is not me saying I’m the only one who understands the granular details; far from it. There are parts of the storyline I just don’t care about because they seem self-evident. Ex. State Dept officials involved in supporting the targeting of Donald Trump. Of course they did, Hillary Clinton was the Secretary of State and that institution is soup-to-nuts compromised. What’s to prove? What’s the value in exposing their activity? It’s all self-evident.
There are many researchers in a small group on the X platform who have a solid understanding, a granular level understanding, and who can cite chapter and verse of evidence to highlight details in the storyline. I’m sure there are other people on other platforms who can do the same, but not many. The point is not a detail or a series of details; the challenge is the entire storyline of complex details that weave together.
It’s the storyline that makes each point of evidence hold value.
When a prosecutor is building a conspiracy case the storyline is the most critical aspect.
The storyline highlights the motive and intention of each of the participants as they branch off into their specific activity and then return to build upon the sum of the targeting. This is the challenge for anyone who first enters with a willingness to understand.
When it comes to the Office of the President, again no one wants the risk – everyone wants the credit. The concentric circles around the Office of the Presidency are full of lawyers (legal filters), advisors/staff (territorial filters), stakeholders and those who look at everything through the prism of political risk to the office. No one wants the risk – Everyone wants the credit.
Catherine Herridge will not walk into a Trump hotel out of fear for being seen. No one wants the risk – Everyone wants the credit.
Maria Bartiromo. No one wants the risk – Everyone wants the credit.
Bill Alderman. No one wants the risk – Everyone wants the credit.
The need for control is a reaction to fear. No one wants the risk – Everyone wants the credit.
Do you remember when I outlined specifically how President Trump could cut through the fog of obstruction by those who seek control and operate from a position of fear as it pertains to declassifying information? {IMPORTANT REMINDER}
That process of releasing information is as true and effective today as it was when I published it in 2020. However, no one associated with the Office of the President has the guts to stand against the institutional and political fury of that approach. Additionally, everyone associated with the territorial objectives of Washington DC would work to ensure President Trump never took that approach. This is one small example.
Joe diGenova asked for the job with all the best intents and objectives. However, it is also true that a lack of granular understanding of the details led to months and months of time wasted in piecing it together. That delay likely led to Main Justice and White House frustration, which culminated in diGenova’s exit. Two things can be true at the same time.
That’s the cold, ugly reality of the situation as outlined by me, a simple guy, who has tried, failed and in some small measures succeeded in getting information extracted from within a system that both protects itself and is surrounded by those who fear it.
If the South Florida team cannot succeed in organizing a conspiracy case, then my advice or hope is that they take all the evidence to the White House and do what should have been done years ago…..
…. RELEASE IT!
IMPORTANT ADD: I forgot to mention another important part. If investigation reached a point where prosecutors were going to take action against those who engaged in corrupt activity, one of the first things the defense lawyers are going to ask is the source of the information that led to the evidence against their client. The prosecution is then bound to tell the defense (Brady discovery) who may have assisted, how the assistance unfolded, and that would provide a path for the defense to scrutinize any motive.
That requirement places the source of assistance in the spotlight of the defense team. The source may then need to get independent counsel to protect against a very predictable Alinsky effort that will be triggered in order to create maximum discomfort for the prosecution team and the evidence being used. That legal counsel is very expensive ($3k to $10k/hr) just to protect the information provider from the Lawfare defense network.
Understanding this dynamic explains why former and current corrupt FBI, CIA and DOJ officials were leaking information during Spygate/Russiagate to the media; that information then became part of the evidence explanation used by the corrupt prosecutors.
If the DOJ were to use information provided by a bunch of anonymous online X researchers: (a) imagine what the defense would do with that, and (b) imagine what the media allies of the defense would do to expose, isolate, ridicule and marginalize those same X researchers. [See Clancey juror holdout]
Lawfare is not a level field.
In one way it protects the information provider(s) if the DOJ retains primary responsibility to discover the raw evidence on their own. However, there is no guarantee they will find it, and that too is a big delay factor.
One of my college professors told us that no man can juggle 100 pieces of information in his head to draw an analysis. This did not take the fact that there a mainframe with computer cards doing linear programing problems. However IBM 360-g40s were limited to 100k bytes of working storage.
Joe diGenova is no longer a spring chicken.
For this problem a spreadsheet is more useful than a mainfrasme.
his heart was in the right place that’s for sure but you certainly made a good point.
Yes. Do the lawfare thing against them.
Call them before the grand jury.
When they lie to the grand jury, send them to jail.
That is probably the only way we will get any of them in jail.
And even if they avoid jail, grind them down to nothing in the process like they did to Flynn. What’s good for the goose…
Unfortunately. Perjury carries slight punishment but it is some punishment never the less.
Wow, Brennan is invoking the name of the half chocolate/half vanilla messiah already.
He’s playing the Obamboozler card early in the game.
By the book, by the book.
When Obozo reminded his cronies to go by the book, I didn’t realize back then he was referring to Alinsky’s book!
I tend to believe that he mostly thinks he’s getting old, AND he’s worried about winding up like Rudy Giuliani has- Joe and Rudy have known each other since the 1980s, then losing everything he’s got in the Lawfare meatgrinder as soon as the Dems can go after him, and then spending the last of his years dealing with it all.
Sometimes you wake up one day and see the reality of the situation and know it’s time to make a change.
Maybe he grabbed a good excuse and quit the job.
It could be this simple- he’s human like we all are.
Life is short.. he’s been at it for a lifetime.
jack reacher……… when confronted with the obvious ending for the old man…………
consequences. The guy ruined many lives.
I am more optimistic.
The Left cannot operate anything worthwhile. A million crooked lawyers cannot manufacture or create a damn thing.
Wherever the Left is in charge, life for everyone goes straight into the toilet. They can’t actually make anything function.
The Left can start shooting conservatives but conservatives have most of the guns and ammunition and they have a lot of practice using their firearms.
i look at living in this time as an adventure. man ,as a whole oblivious to the evil moving the pieces around.like in Job , the Almighty letting it. rush limbaugh…… ‘truth goes through three phases. first it is ignored. then it is violently opposed.(thats coming). then it is accepted as self evident’. i have to compliment sundance as the only one to put the nasty details in focus.
Same here gary. 🕶️✝️🕶️
I worked in DC among the agency and political culture.
Many (most?) Republican elected officials are no better than Democratic elected officials.
What they need is Sundance as the project manager for the case, reporting to someone with Tulsi’s authority and her courage to take the risks.
The manager would oversee the entire investigation, delegating to subordinates the evidence needed and where to find it w/o being required to have total understanding of the entire mess. Then he would give the collected evidence to a small group to assemble it at his direction into a timeline more easy to understand.
Then, as Sundance said – “Release it”.
Methinks SunDance wouldn’t touch it with a 10 foot pole…
With Tulsi we were seeing that happening, Sundance has the goods.
Tulsi and Sundance have the courage. Will another brave soul take the risks?? Sundance just wrote about it.
“They want the credit…” With Solomon I hope our President can see through him soon.
This is the complete reason for limited government. It becomes so large and corrupt that nothing of value can get done and criminals can run wild!
You said ….”Brennan is already in court trying to force DOJ to preserve records so he can fight any indictment”….
This is not what Brennan is doing.
Know the Lawfare game.
What Brennan’s lawyers are doing is trying to identify the source of the evidence against him, so they can then Alinsky (isolate, ridicule, marginalize and destroy) the person(s) who are leading the investigators to the evidence.
Brennan’s Lawfare operatives are proactively framing a narrative defense that the media will deploy if the threat materializes!
A$k me how I know.
Thank you, Sundance.
Thank you.
Classic example is the lone juror who refused to compromise what he knew as the right thing to do. Now the other jurors and the public are trying to destroy his credibility! That is the game in defeating the evil that runs beneath the core of the justice system. Jefferson realized early on that the judicial system would be the slow creep of decay beneath the foundation of the Republic!
Lindsay Clancy juror: “he had the hardest time getting over the fact that Lindsay Clancy viciously killed her children.” Says it all.
Brennan appeared on MS NOW today hosted by his favorite media mouthpiece Nicolle Wallace. One segment featured a discussion of the recent subpoena. Brennan’s line was “why I just had to get an investigation going when I suspected contacts between Trump people and Russians!”
Wallace chipped in an odd observation that neither Mueller nor Comey’s FBI ever charged any Trump associates with crimes related to collusion, as if this proved these investigators were clean or something.
No doubt should the time come to ramp up the lawfare Brennan will turn to his favorite media power couple, Wallace and Schmidt.
I agree, Sundance. If and when Brennan discovers who these sources are, he and/or his lawyers will leak their identities to his friends at MS NOW and the N.Y. Times (likely Mike Schmidt). They’ll handle the hit pieces. It’s how the game is played.
Rewatched the Wallace interview. Brennan justifies his Obama-directed intelligence report by claiming it justified investigating Trump because once they saw the Russians were interfering in the election they had no choice but to open a probe of Trump and his people. (Funny he fails to mention the ICA report blaming Russia for meddling wasn’t commissioned until AFTER the election.) That’s some real reaching and stretching there.
Brennan smugly asserts the Florida prosecutors have no real evidence against him, as if he knows everything the grand jury has been shown. What an obnoxious arrogant blowhard.
Walk boldly in the light, be right with God and there is no sense of fear.
I agree that this is the real problem. If you must have the credit, then you do not love : Justice, Righteousness, Courage and TRUTH.
It seems to me that we need to ask Father God to raise up the Righteous Person who will step out and do right in The Name of God. Afterall, He heard our prayers and sent Trump. IF we don’t, it may not happen.
In times like these, these are the qualities required to retain the civil gifts given to us by Father God: Life, Liberty, Justice, Truth, Righteousness and Love. It only comes by sacrifice…on everyone’s part.
Sundance, perhaps you considered this and rejected it, but what would happen if you made the 4hr video ( voice in the background) that includes the appearance of the appropriate documents? Would that help some of these people move in the right direction?
I bless Father God that He put it in you to know the whole story, providing everything you have needed to line up all the dots.
I thank you for your obedience to follow Him.
What’s one thing they can focus on? Forget the whole story
This post SD had to be one of the most dreaded activities you have ever produced.
We are brothers in Christ, I pray you remain strong and thank you for all of your time and effort that is unmatched. I have been on CTH for 10 years reading your posts daily. You have helped me and thousands of others trying to wrap our heads around the complex lawfare corruption debacle deliberately targeting conservatives as a whole and Trump.
Thank you.
Why won’t they “Walk boldly in the light, be right with God and there is no sense of fear?” What if they have no fear. But they fear for their loved ones? Changes the calculus a bit. We saw them do this in November, 2020, during the Georgia election recount. Which, many forget, had broad support in the GOP, figures like Ronna McDaniel (née Romney) stood at rallies demanding recounts, audits. Until the news stories about the unalive-ing of the Loeffler staffer/Kemp daughter boyfriend and the unalive-ing of the GBI investigator came:
https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/loeffler-campaign-staff-member-kemp-family-friend-dies/OLPRRAIMKNAPZPRJA2GYRIHFMU/
https[colon]//www[dot]investmentwatchblog[dot]com/the-gbi-agent-reportedly-assigned-to-gov-kemps-daughters-boyfriends-mysterious-fatal-accident-has-committed-suicide-in-georgia/
Their deaths were exactly like how the Mob sends dead fish/horse heads as a message to people it wants to silence. And it’s not a coincidence that after the mysterious deaths of Kemp/Loeffler associate and the police investigator that Georgia R’s stopped their challenge, anyone questioning results was called election deniers and prosecuted. And the Ronna McDaniel’s all started saying the 2020 stolen election was the safest, most secure election, like, ever, and only dangerous insurrectionist election deniers would question it. Exactly what waking up next to a horsehead would lead to. About that not walking boldly in the light and being right with God thing…unless their entire family is on board, ready to accept the risk it may very well be they are fearless and right with God. But they aren’t on behalf of their families.
Without disagreeing with the dual premises of risk avoidance and the difficulty of mastery of details for big events, I would believe more that Joe DiGenova’s motives were pure if this were not a reprise of the efforts he’d made to lionize Bill Barr’s addition as Attorney General to Trump’s first Administration… as one who would hold the hoaxers accountable. Bill Barr would not investigate the clear evidence of voting fraud in 2020 and was notable among those stoking the insurrection narrative from January 6th on. Joe never retracted nor qualified his support for Barr.
These are High Noon problems; complexity is stripped down to a grudge the bad guys, like Frank Miller and his gang!, have for those who would put them in jail. In that movie, risk avoidance is made the crux… to shine light on the effort it takes to not walk away from the fight. Being the one to hold others accountable does not end with one’s term as sheriff. And bystanders and community pillars’ offers of support for the fight often ring hollow.
Watching Kash Patel (not a favorite of Sundance) battle wits with the likes of Adam Schiff recently, there does need to be a stand taken that supersedes risk, terms and details because the snakes keep coming back as if nothing was ever written about their misdeeds. The lesson seems to be that the courts are not the venue for that. Action and will get one to the post. And for that, you must know yourself.
Good memory. It’s a club…..
“Nobody wants the risk, everyone wants the credit.”
As the age-old quote goes, “Success has many fathers. Failure is an orphan.”
Burn it all down. God had to flood the earth. Sometimes the best path is a clean slate. What are we saving?
Make an arrest, lesser sentence for implicating other criminals. Arrest the criminals, lesser sentence for implicating others. Wash,rinse,repeat
What am I missing?
You are missing the fact that the big wig, corrupt, traittorous, politicians have a “Get Out Of Jail, FREE!” card, and only the low-hanging fruit will get the “Wash, rinse, repeat” treatment…
Sundance your story reminds me as an instructor for nuclear power plant operators. The day of the walking oral exam of one of the operators from a separate exam organization, said to me “(my name) if I pass this you had nothing to do with it and if
I fail its all your fault”.
Kinda like “heads I win, tails you lose!”
Amazing ! Many thanks Sundance !
Dan Bongino was on the story from2016 on, and wrote several books. Do you suppose he spent a year as deputy director of the FBI and did not root out evidence, or identify seditionist FBI employees. Most oddly, now that he is back on his mic, he never talks about any of this. Weird. . . .
…”Do you suppose he spent a year as deputy director of the FBI and did not root out evidence, or identify seditionist FBI employees. “….
The evidence supports that he did not.
Bongino did spend a lot of time identifying the J6 pipe bomber, but where is that case? Brian Cole has not entered a plea, and his case is still pending in court. Just like all the other crimes committed by the left on that day, it goes down a rabbit hole and disappears, never to be heard from again.
HOLY SMOKES! The Mother of the Alleged J6 Pipe Bomber Speaks Out in EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW! Must Watch!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/09/holy-smokes-mother-alleged-j6-pipe-bomber-speaks/
Just like it was with election fraud, the arduous work of investigating and prosecuting Deep State criminal activity should have been started more than a year ago in the spring of 2025 using a DOJ/FBI special task force assigned to that one job, and with added staff augmentation as needed.
But it wasn’t started when it desperately needed to be started.
Just like the situation with the Trump Administration’s lack of timely action on election fraud, work on addressing Deep State criminality was only started in the summer of 2026, with predictable consequences; i.e., that too little time was available to sift through the many sordid details of these crimes and then to make sense of them.
Donald Trump is the nation’s chief law enforcement officer. It was his job to ensure that quick action was taken. He and the RINOs who infest his administration are responsible for the situation we see today.
It was their job to get this work started in a timely manner, and they didn’t do what the MAGA voter base expected of them, with the consequence that the criminal actors are likely to get away with their crimes; and worse, to keep on perpetrating more crimes.
The US Constitution is not designed to protect us from the unelected Deep State. Nor did the Founders ever contemplate we would create one.
WOW !!! This is what I told my wife — basically EXACTLY — a day ago …
You said regarding the current diGenova/Blanche/DOJ situation and “the system” in WA D.C.:
“ …. No one wants the risk – Everyone wants the credit. This forms the baseline for … ” well, the baseline for basically EVERYTHING in Gov’t in general and WA D.C. in particular … and that’s based upon my decades long up-close and personal interaction (sometimes) in “the system” and with some of the players whose names many herein would recognize …
My 80 year old eyes continue to glaze over …
When I was working inside the MIC, it was in my job description to make productive things happen in the face of a hide-bound intransigent bureaucracy — a bureaucracy which is populated by hide-bound intransigent bureaucrats.
This I did by knowing the who, the what, the why, the where, the when and the how of the particular bureaucracies I was dealing with in ways which made me and my staff more knowledgeable than the bureaucrats themselves about the work these people were supposed to be performing.
I didn’t win every battle I had with the bureaucrats, but I won more battles than I lost. The big lesson here is that when you pick a fight with a bureaucracy, just by trying to be productive, you have to know more than they themselves know about their role in the particular program or project you are managing.
The way to keep one’s eyes from glazing over in dealing with a bureaucracy is to understand that knowledge is power.
The more knowledge you have at your fingertips, and the more patience you have in figuring out how to use that knowledge to the benefit of your program or project, the more likely it is you can work through a bureaucracy to get the things done that you want to get done.
All good observations, IMO …. and to a lesser degree than you, BTDT … and thanks, Brother.
But I gotta’ admit, my “favorite” IOWA is still the Missouri … and for a variety of reasons starting way back when I was a boy … (smiles)
Good explaination for why no one wants the risk. I think most of the same issues would arise
if everything was just released…Is that what’s known as a Catch-22?
It’s sort of like picking the best of bad choices or doing nothing.
Dig is old and he does not run on Trump time/speed. Work at a desk do interview/interrogate make notes right briefs get home by 6PM. The old fashion way.
Agree, release everything. Let the public decide.
Yes… Enough “investigation”! Indict, arrest the traitors, and let the chips fall where they may!
Joe is 81 and Victoria is 84. Not trying to be ageist here, but they just might not have the stamina required to get up to date with the facts and move forward quickly with prosecutions on a pretty complicated case of conspiracy.
diGenova is John Solomon’s lawyer.
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/24/ukraine-oligarch-lawyers-joe-digenova-victoria-toensing-056643
Your analyses and presentations of these “Gordian knots” are the light that pierces the darkness.
Thank you and honor be to you for your work in publishing this.
I get it. It’s like Sundance weaving his pot on theories/stories through our lives everyday. I can’t imagine trying to start to explain the enormity in the game of global politics to anyone who doesn’t follow the Last Refuge. I’m still not sure myself if we’re being checked or checkmated by these evil creatures.
This is the game. Confuse the record, keep switching judges, delay the process, by the time it goes to trial, nobody knows the facts. Our legal system has been corrupted at every level. The last bastion of freedom is our military. Religion -gone. Speech -gone. Congress-gone.
Am I wrong?
Nope, you are right “on target”… But you can expect the Hopium crowd to start calling you a commie, a troll, or worse…
sounds like this subject needs a class. 30 to 50 at a time. prosecutors. get them up to speed
Too late to “train” prosecutors… Lots of good ones out there, they should have been hired 600 days ago…
Yes indeed, they should have been hired 600 days ago. And the whole prosecution effort which is needed is of such a magnitude and scale that it needs to be managed as a project which has a written charter from the president, which employs a dedicated staff having a variety of skill sets, and which is driven by a written project plan and schedule which lists all the tasks and the documents which must be delivered for the project to succeed.
This kind of thing could never happen with Suzie Wiles as chief of the president’s staff, with Pam Bondi as DOJ-AG,; and as it turns out, with Kash Patel as FBI Director.
Nothing sceams “Tort Reform” more than this article. Maybe military tribunals are the only way to get justice “While I’m still young”. Jeesh, we’re so lame.
Any aspiring career DOJ lawyer that participates in the grand conspiracy investigation will be subject to ostracism and career ending consequences should the democrats regain the presidency. We also must tip our hats to academia centers for graduating students with judicial doctorate degrees that have been radicalized and indoctrinated. We can see the results now from current and past DOJ attorney general’s, Supreme Court judges and federal and state judges who have been going rogue.
Basically, Sundance has described how and why our government is no longer functioning as intended. Feckless, amoral people, disinterested in the integrity of government and focused purely on short term gains. No accountability, no country.
“No one wants the risk – Everyone wants the credit.”
Indeed, I’ve seen this 1st hand myself.
The elected and unelected crowd in DC is highly risk-averse.
At the exact same time, they will stick a family member in the back if it means getting public credit for something (anything).
Both sides of the aisle.
Right on, Brother … (sorry for my semi-’60s vernacular) … but “right on” in any case …
Blessings to you, Sundance.
It can’t be fixed.
Broken beyond repair or redemption.
It must be fixed, there is no place left to run to. Russia might be attractive but they won’t last if we give up.
Here’s the thing.
The DS receives no prison sentences but we, the citizens, will be have “Prison sentences” that are emotional, physical, or financial.
While reading this, I thought about the data map that that dude Moose on the Loose put together about Canada, Carney and Brookfield. https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVIgUjvog=/
I sometimes wonder how does Sundance remember all of the millions of data points (obsidian.md //a chinese app?). The map that he’s created must surely be of very high value to PDJT.
Sorry, I was in a rush to make the post above. I should have stated “something like the app obsidian”. I wasn’t inferring that SD used that app. I just used it as an example of a data mapping app.
So let’s get rid of the guy and find some one new who has to start from the beginning. Typical govt bullshiz
I agree. Release all of the documents. Then, military tribunals for all who committed treason and criminally conspired to commit treason to remove a duly elected and sworn President of the United States and for giving aid and comfort to enemies of the United States of America.
This is more like it! https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/insignificant-friday-september-18?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=463409&post_id=216308755&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=2p5zrw&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
Woo hoo!
I was here, with you, when you decided to go to the crappy hotel, you waited for the meeting, you told someone what had happened, and then…nothing. You realized they were silo’d. You realized how things really were.
I refer to this as everyone in the DC area shops at Giant and the pharmacist knows your business so nothing is ever going to get done.
After you had your epiphany I had mine and at my age I looked at the presidents, the congresses, the media since Nixon pushed for China to be come out of its hibernation and join the world even though it supported North Korea and the US had been in a UN war against them as well as Vietnam.
It was one long grind.
Once Nixon was forced out the left never let the idea go that the presidency was special and should not be lawyered or forced into existence. The right was the 2nd child and just played catch up.
to be very honest with you, Sundance, if I had the information and knowledge that you have accrued over the last 12 years, my teeth would be ground into dust in anger by now. I don’t know how you do it. when Obama was president I had a piece of property with about 70 acres directly behind me and on my lanai I had a flatscreen TV and when Obama would start lying, I would blow holes in that flatscreen TV. I bought them by the case, that’s how much I hated being lied to by that son of a gun.