That’s ultimately the question at the heart of the matter. What will come first, the AI false flag event that will trigger support for government regulation that includes liability protection; or the lawsuits against the AI developers for stealing intellectual property?
How you place your bet will likely determine your investment decision.
On one hand you have the AI frontier groups, developers who have stolen corporate secrets, extracted proprietary intellectual property, engaged in widespread copyright violations and built their AI models with mass unauthorized data collection. On the other hand, you have massive corporations, individuals and groups who have seen their intellectual property rights infringed by data harvesting to run the models.
The AI developers are requesting “regulation” which includes liability protection for outcomes as a result of users running their models. The investors into those AI developers also want regulation and liability immunity to protect their investments. This is the group now positioning for government regulation and selling the voices who control that decision (politicians) based on a pitch that includes government control over AI information. This is the group that will trigger the false flag to generate public support for AI safety.
The ordinary individuals & businesses who have seen their intellectual property stolen by the AI groups, the individuals who have watched their copyright protections violated, the corporations who benefit from increased AI efficiency but also see the downside from publicly exposed trade secrets now being widely available, would be the plaintiff group in a series of predictable lawsuits against the AI developers.
This is the core of the matter. Control/Immunity or Risk/Lawsuits. Mike Steger outlines the last two weeks:
.
Two years ago, I said we would reach an inflection point where the interests of Silicon Valley would conflict with the interests of MAGA. We are on the cusp of that moment. Will the Silicon Valley/Leftist-Govt win through regulatory control under the guise of ‘trust and safety’. Or will the larger population see through the scheme and align with liberty, freedom and the free-market approach.
Place your bets.
And on which side will JD Vance land?
We already know …
Probably the same side ultimately as the last created politician from Kenya
If on the wrong side, it will cost him the nomination. Rubio towers above Vance. My opinion of course. Hope Im not off topic, but who do the libtards have that can beat either?
Rumor is that AOC is positioning herself as THE progressive candidate – might be looking to get the nod for the VP slot if Newsom is the nominee?
She’s a dummer version of Kamala without the baggage. I can’t imagine what Rubio or JD would do to her in debate.
Lol..
Newsom will not be the nominee.
When it comes to the politicians of BigTech and Deepstate things are never what they seem on the surface.
Rubio says that Russia is loosing 25,000 soldiers a month and he knows that’s a lie.
Why is he lying to us with such an outrageous claim? It’s because he wants us to continue giving billions to Ukraine and wants us killing more Russians.
I don’t think a liar is what we want in the White House?
Cheating…🙄
‘”on which side will JD Vance land?”
the side that put him on the ticket
easier to apologize (or stall out lawsuits) than ask for permission
It’s fascinating how many ‘the sky is falling!!’ articles and interviews have sprung up in the past 2 or 3 weeks.
Is there a real,
potentially critical problem with AI?
Yes, there may be.
All the hoo-hah the past weeks??
That ain’t it.
The hoo-hah is their own, created to scare us into thier regulatory chains.
That can be true at the same time AI is being harnessed for mass surveillance, IP theft, information control and mass propaganda.
I can imagine that defending against a “bad” AI is going to take another AI as such with the ways that it operates in cyberspace.
There’s something of a parallel with firearms. I subscribe to the philosophy that an armed society is a polite society.
But, God.
The “I complied with government regulations, so my product couldn’t be dangerous or defective” defense has been used for decades in products liability cases, and not always successfully.
The debate has been whether regulations established a floor or a ceiling for safety precautions. The AI developers want a ceiling – nothing required of them but compliance with government regs.
We let BigHospital, BigPharma and Big Insurance write and enforce our healthcare regulations.
What reason have we given BigTech to not think that we’d fall for again this time?
Pa is a DBA of a specific expertise.
I have already shared my opinion of the “Cloud” and it’s indirect scraping of an entire company’s intellectual property and financials, maybe while parking it safely.
I see that this AI stuff is of the same business model. I prefer to call it the “AI scrape”. SCRAPING (stealing) of every drop of a company’s intellectual and financial property. And it’s not storing it but actually using it actively in a million other ways and maybe not in a company’s best interest.
Maybe a competitor can use it against them, I don’t know all the ways this goes sideways but the government has absolutely no business interfering in this fight and picking winners and losers. While those money pigs and their friends get rich.
My interest lies in WHO can get their hands on the whole f-ing thing and then use it for evil ends and political ideology.
So yes, see you in court to fight for property rights, liberty and freedom.
UP HOLD THE CONSTITUTION. No matter what argument you hear, it still pertains timeless to the new technology. Just not to the rogue government not applying it’s principals and new Communism (Democrats) torturing it’s interpretation.
The fascinating part is that both bets are built on LIES and Stupidity of the Big Tech Captains.
LIES = Nothing was stolen, as access was granted via stupid contracting practices (if anything was in fact accessed by the AI Labs) and utter incompetent oversight (Legal and Technical) by the companies contracting the AI Labs.
Stupidity = Lax security if something was in fact “stolen”.
LIES = Gaslighting doomsday reporting and assigning “human behavior attributes” to inanimate Software.
Hedge your bets in any case as one event will beget the other.
The false flag will results legislation.
The legislation will result in a retaliatory false flag.