That’s ultimately the question at the heart of the matter. What will come first, the AI false flag event that will trigger support for government regulation that includes liability protection; or the lawsuits against the AI developers for stealing intellectual property?
How you place your bet will likely determine your investment decision.
On one hand you have the AI frontier groups, developers who have stolen corporate secrets, extracted proprietary intellectual property, engaged in widespread copyright violations and built their AI models with mass unauthorized data collection. On the other hand, you have massive corporations, individuals and groups who have seen their intellectual property rights infringed by data harvesting to run the models.
The AI developers are requesting “regulation” which includes liability protection for outcomes as a result of users running their models. The investors into those AI developers also want regulation and liability immunity to protect their investments. This is the group now positioning for government regulation and selling the voices who control that decision (politicians) based on a pitch that includes government control over AI information. This is the group that will trigger the false flag to generate public support for AI safety.
The ordinary individuals & businesses who have seen their intellectual property stolen by the AI groups, the individuals who have watched their copyright protections violated, the corporations who benefit from increased AI efficiency but also see the downside from publicly exposed trade secrets now being widely available, would be the plaintiff group in a series of predictable lawsuits against the AI developers.
This is the core of the matter. Control/Immunity or Risk/Lawsuits. Mike Steger outlines the last two weeks:
.
Two years ago, I said we would reach an inflection point where the interests of Silicon Valley would conflict with the interests of MAGA. We are on the cusp of that moment. Will the Silicon Valley/Leftist-Govt win through regulatory control under the guise of ‘trust and safety’. Or will the larger population see through the scheme and align with liberty, freedom and the free-market approach.
Place your bets.
$12 diesel comes before both those things
In before an AI false flag operation causes $12 diesel.
“Will the Silicon Valley/Leftist-Govt win through regulatory control under the guise of ‘trust and safety’. Or will the larger population see through the scheme and align with liberty, freedom and the free-market approach.”
Sinful, broken human beings continually make the wrong choices. May God have mercy on us.
If my intellectual property were stolen then a bulldog law firm would be on retainer and writing up the paperwork to sue the bastards. Screw Wall Street.
When you put your information out on the Internet and someone uses it how is that a copyright violation?
The only data AI has information on is in the public domain on the Internet. My personal bank account information is with Wells Fargo and AI doesn’t have access to it.
If you put your intellectual property on the public Internet it’s free for the taking.
Your personal information is sold all the time without your knowledge. That includes WF. I promise you it’s in the fine print on a form you signed somewhere.
I doubt it! They may sell my name and address but they can’t release any financial information.
This article states that the information was stolen.
*******
This paragraph from this article: “On one hand you have the AI frontier groups, developers who have >>stolen corporate >secrets, extracted proprietary intellectual property, engaged in widespread copyright >>violations and built their AI models with mass >>unauthorized data collection. On the other hand, you have massive corporations, individuals and groups who have seen their intellectual property rights >infringed by data harvesting to run the models.”
From >this article, by Sundance.
The businesses using ai have to give it access to thier stuff in order for it to be useful. The ai has been not just using it as needed but copying it all. Then it surfaces somewhere else. The same thing is happening to individuals using ai. In order for it to be of any use it has to have access to your stuff. Not what you wrote on fb, what’s in your computer. All of it grabbed stored and used to train ai. Or whatever else they want to do with it really. I avoid using ai but they recently force installed gemini on my phone (all android phones). I disabled it as best I can but I can see it doing stuff and its sending and receiving data but I can’t see what. Im pretty sure it’s spying on me, on everyone.
Whenever I use AI even for technical information like medical they clearly cite the source of the information including a website link. I think that’s pretty legitimate way to do business.
“If you put your intellectual property on the public Internet it’s free for the taking.”
Not really….
If I present something that I’ve created, I have not waived my rights to its license.
Simply because you can view my work, does not give you the right to copy it.
Correct.
The Democrats have their knives sharpened for Big Tech because the tech companies are cooperating with President Trump. They also see the EU shaking down American tech companies for billions on fake violations.
You are one wise individual, Sundance.
You know its going to be the government regulating it. The tide is already moving that way. The fear mongering, tbe uncertainty….ad nauseam.
Only tbe government can save us from the evil all-seeing Skynet AI these billionaires have built.
It doesnt matter what they use to start the kabuki play in DC….DC will regulate it…..Repub or Dem.
We all know it.
It’s clearly inevitable.
That’s the UniParty business model.
I’d bet the deals to protect the companies that will inflict harm have already been signaled of their protection.
No company be it technology or product should get special protection at all and should be held accountable for the harm they inflict on people.
Drug manufacturers go unpunished and are never held accountable for the poison concoctions that turn unstable people into cold blooded murders.
And if AI is so sure it won’t cause issues why do they need protection ?
Agreed !
My bet is that AI will eventually kill us all, maybe not directly but it will play a key role because somebody thinks they know what is best for the world. Sure, there are many, many applications that would greatly benefit from AI like medicine, disease research, weather prediction and other business applications but governments, predictably, will use it for military actions and that is where things will all go horribly wrong.
Whose side will Vance take, his tech-bro handlers or PDJT47?
My money is on AI false flag. The regulations are already written and waiting, just like the Patriot Act was.
A new story is out about District Judges colluding behind the scenes to prepare lawfare against Trump by having written documents that they can cut and paste into Injunctions.
All we need to remember is the recent last time “immunity” was granted by paid off (lobbied, Big Pharma) Congress…
Wanna bet, as with the Patriot Act, the legislation has long been written, shoved in a drawer somewhere, the key under heavier guard than the nuclear code, waiting, waiting, waiting for that most propitious moment?
Wouldn’t bet against it.
I would recommend PDJT aggressively publicize a false flag is coming. For everybody to be on the watch for it.
This would inoculate from the dangerous effects of the false flag.
Lawfare at this moment is likely using AI to search for never ending opportunities in our law system to gain control and regulate Big Tech.
I vote for false flag
I bet on loss of privacy and IP.
99% of Americans give their private info to big tech gladly. They don’t care about privacy.
I just watched Bannon and he had a pollster on that showed that 60% of Americans will vote for socialists in 2026 to ‘try something new’ after failures by Trump to address the issues they care about. After the socialists screw it up they will go back to a republican.
Another guest said China steals about $600B of IP per year.
People just don’t care now that they have been betrayed by Trump and Congress.
Anyone who feels they have been betrayed by President Trump is not MAGA.
Thank you!
Bannon is very anti AI.
Before we quit watching him he had someone complaining about it every day.
The gambling corporations (descendants of mobsters) will buy out the technology and use it to continue the rule, “can’t beat the house.”
I highly encourage everyone to listen to the last Moonshots podcast. All of the hosts are great but AWG, in particular, is absolutely brilliant and cuts through all of the bullshit and noise.
His analogy is — we lost 50 years of cheap/free energy through over-regulation of nuclear power under the guise of “safety”.
We can’t let the same thing happen with AI. Too many huge problems can be solved.
“AI will kill us all… until it solves human aging.”
Thanks……That’s an excellent analogy….I WILL use that !…… 😉 🤓
how do the expensive frontier u.s. models expect to survive with the free/next to free chynese models breathing down their necks
as this unfolds, regulation of the industry seems their only lifeline
I place my bet on MAGA, on Freedom, on Truth, and on the Second Amendment;
Should I bet otherwise and win, no amount of money from the scraps their table is gonna bring those back.
Both the RINOs and the DSA-controlled Democrat party will happily allow the AI developers to write their own legislation, just like they have done in virtually every other sector of the economy, patent’s and trade marks be damned!
The only reason that the Democrats (temporarily) have their knives out for AI, is because DJT is promoting AI and they need an issue to run on in the mid-terms, preferably an issue that they can use to scare the populous into the polls. The Left loves AI and they want to use it to deploy a far more effective thought control regime, than what they had during COVID, when everyone was kicked off of the Internet for thought crimes. In order for them to gaslight the public, they need to lie, lie often and never expose us to the actual truth … that’s where AI comes in, as “the truth” is simply a matter of which “facts” are used to train the AI model.
That last photo says it all. The DS/Big Government/AI Grand Poohbahs aren’t about to let go of the control they will have with AI.
Based on past experiences I’m betting that we will see “trust and security”.
Or as it says in I Thess. 5:3 , “peace and safety”.
“lawsuits against the AI developers”
IMO let the lawsuits begin for patent infringements, etc. – except if the patent holders let the AI people in on their secrets.
We have been screwed over enough by immunities granted to big pharma and pesticide manufacturers.
lawsuits!
the sure thing money to be had there makes the AI companies’s financial implosion pale in comparison.
think of all those democrat connected law firms with their big time contributions to the democrat party.
i bet they’re buying off dem politicians right now to ixnay any regulation legislation in the “spirit of bipartisanship”. 😂
indeed, there are trillions at stake, but a solid bet on a lawsuit beats shaky returns on stock in questionable ventures
(see the previous CTH article on the creative accounting approach used to value the AI groups.)
in the meantime, look out for the fevered increase in AI fear porn.
i expect something along the lines of “War Games”.
are we still supposed to hide under our desks?🫣
As predicted years ago, Skynet must send a cyborg back in time to kill Sarah Connor to solve this complex problem.
Will someone give me two examples of intellectual property that has been stolen with the help if AI?
Hopefully Jesus comes before either of those things.
I’ll be suspicious when Mountain Dew introduces its version of CocaCola using the stolen recipe.
Yeah… let Jacob Coxon and Dario Amodei convince China to regulate their AI first, then we’ll regulate ours.
It’s a tough bet…bc having watched the All-In Summit episode with Jensen Huang recently on ai/data centers etc….. DJT happened ( 😉 ) to call in to Jensens cell LIVE 🥴 ….. THE subsequent solicitation of pro or con opinion by Jensen to the well heeled, wanna-be, tech savvy, entrepreneur crowd, re: govt regulation was met with a VERY PRO HANDS OFF competitive policy, vote.
David Sacks our “Crypto AI czar” …..charter member of the ALL IN clan ……was onstage with all the besties as well, at the time….
So I think silicon valley has drifted more maga than we have been led to believe.
False Flag *and* real attacks. One as proof of concept, then fire for effect.
And Tech has never been aligned with MAGA. Tolerant, appeasing, but never really aligned. Patriots are alone, as always, against a world that neither values nor trusts liberty.
Since the tech companies will most likely know when the lawsuits are going to first start dropping (their own attorneys will tell them about lawsuits they hear are in the works), I would bet that the false flag event will come first.
“For when they shall say, peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.”
1 Thessalonians 5:3
One only has to watch the obsequiousness on display when Canadian PM Mark Carney or the piano playing puppet Zelensky have an audience with the germanic King Charles. ‘One Ring To Rule Them All?’
Americans are stupid as a whole. We will choose slavery.
No liability immunity for these clowns!
No false flag should be needed to regulate everybody who uses AI in a production fashion, because AI in its nearly infinite forms is so potentially hazardous to humanity. Whoever doesn’t see that has simply not thought it through nearly well enough.
The third option, the one that will unleash global growth and innovation is true open source of the core engines, models and interfaces. Combine with open standards to ensure competition ensues by enabling value-add – not the control of information.
Level the playing field. Break the monopolies. Make capital available to all. There many brilliant software minds in open source community that will run circles around the likes of Musk, Amodi, Theil. Karp and the rest of globalists’ oligarchs.
‘Astonishing Theft’: New York Times’ Lawsuit Against OpenAI Reveals How AI Kingpins Think About Copyright
New filings in The New York Times‘ copyright lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft allege that OpenAI’s president was told about a method for bypassing the newspaper’s paywall and responded with apparent approval.
One Microsoft executive commented internally that OpenAI’s scraping of copyrighted material amounted to “an astonishing theft of unprecedented proportions.”
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2026/09/18/astonishing-theft-new-york-times-lawsuit-against-openai-reveals-how-ai-kingpins-think-about-copyright/
Who else gets immunity from debilitating injuries, including death? Pharma. AI software companies are looking for the same protection so they can do whatever they want with no repurcussions.