The Wall Street Journal is out with a very specific hit piece against Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. The article is 100% Intelligence Community insider lawfare against DNI Gabbard; however, in addition to being completely bogus the construct of the hit itself is very revealing.
Within this current story we are going to find out why it is so important for someone, anyone to reveal how the 2019 CIA operation against President Trump was created. {GO DEEP}
The first CIA operation (2017) involved the National Intelligence Council (NIC sub-silo) and a Russian intelligence analyst, Eric Ciaramella. That was the creation of the fraudulent Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) written from within the NIC at the direction of John Brennan. The second CIA operation was the 2019 fraudulent Trump impeachment effort, again originating from Russian analyst Eric Ciaramella (anonymous whistleblower) who was represented by legal counsel Andrew Bakaj.
The current attack against DNI Tulsi Gabbard involves her May 2025 move to take the National Intelligence Counsel out of the CIA, and remove the heads of the agency, Chairman Mike Collins (friend of Mike Morrell) and Deputy Chair Maria Langan-Riekhof. {GO DEEP}
Within the current “leak”, structurally another false narrative, the Wall Street Journal frames yet another anonymous intelligence community whistleblower complaint, this time against DNI Tulsi Gabbard. Notice: the “anonymous whistleblower” is again represented by legal counsel Andrew Bakaj. The anti-Trump intelligence officials are running the same play.
As noted by DNI Spokesperson Olivia Coleman, “This is a classic case of a politically motivated individual weaponizing their position in the Intelligence Community, submitting a baseless complaint and then burying it in highly classified information to create 1) false intrigue, 2) a manufactured narrative, and 3) conditions which make it substantially more difficult to produce “security guidance” for transmittal to Congress.”
WASHINGTON—A U.S. intelligence official has alleged wrongdoing by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard in a whistleblower complaint that is so highly classified it has sparked months of wrangling over how to share it with Congress, according to U.S. officials and others familiar with the matter.
The filing of the complaint has prompted a continuing, behind-the-scenes struggle about how to assess and handle it, with the whistleblower’s lawyer accusing Gabbard of stonewalling the complaint. Gabbard’s office rejects that characterization, contending it is navigating a unique set of circumstances and working to resolve the issue.
[…] The complaint was filed last May with the intelligence community’s inspector general, according to a November letter that the whistleblower’s lawyer addressed to Gabbard. The letter, which was viewed by The Wall Street Journal, accused Gabbard’s office of hindering the dissemination of the complaint to lawmakers by failing to provide necessary security guidance on how to do so.
[…] Gabbard answered written questions about the allegations from the inspector general’s office, a senior official at the spy agency said. That prompted the acting inspector general at the time, Tamara Johnson, to determine the allegations specifically about Gabbard weren’t credible, the official said.
[…] The complaint includes a separate allegation about “an office within a different federal agency,” upon which the watchdog’s office wasn’t able to make a credibility determination, the representative for that office said. The Wall Street Journal couldn’t determine the identity of the other federal agency. (read more)
The Wall Street Journal cannot determine the “other federal agency” provenance, but we can.
The office was the “National Intelligence Council” and the ‘other federal agency’ was/is the CIA. The background context is exactly as we previously outlined {SEE HERE}.
DNI Tulsi Gabbard has been removing the Intelligence Community tentacles used to control political policy. The Intelligence Community and the downstream stakeholders hate her.
Here’s where it becomes important to understand the full context of what DNI Gabbard did in May 2025 to infuriate the IC. The CIA was running another impeachment operation when DNI Tulsi Gabbard intercepted it.
The issue involved President Trump and Marco Rubio designating Tren de Aragua (TdA) as a terror group operating as part of the coordinated effort by Venezuela dictator Nicolas Maduro. To undermine Trump/Rubio the National Intelligence Council within the CIA created analysis that contradicted the White House claim.
CBS Margaret Brennan was prepared to frame the narrative just before Tulsi Gabbard intercepted it. Brennan saying to Rubio, “Do you accept the intelligence community’s assessment that the Venezuelan gang is not a proxy force of the Maduro government? That was the National Intelligence Council assessment.
SEC. RUBIO: “Yeah, that’s their assessment. They’re wrong. In fact, the FBI agrees with me that they are. We- we- the FBI agrees that not only is Tren de Aragua exported by the Venezuelan regime, but in fact, if you go back and see a Tren de Aragua member, all the evidence is there, and it’s growing every day, was actually contracted to murder an opposition member, I believe, in Chile a few months ago. So, one of the warnings out there by the FBI is not simply that Tren de Aragua are- are a terrorist organization, but one that has already been operationalized, to murder a- to murder a- an- an opposition member in another country.”
In early 2025 the CIA was working to kneecap the Trump administration’s moves in Venezuela. [I suspect, because the CIA funding mechanism involves money flows from the drug running that Venezuela supported.]
In essence, the NIC sub-silo within the parent CIA agency was weaponizing intelligence against President Trump in order to trigger a Lawfare attack. DNI Tulsi Gabbard intercepted the issue, removed the NIC agency from the CIA and dispatched the two heads, Mike Collins and Maria Langan-Riekhof.
That’s the sourcing for the “anonymous whistleblower” shot against DNI Gabbard in 2025, that surfaced in today’s Wall Street Journal.
Again, I will repeat…. Until the Trump administration puts full sunlight on the intelligence community operations; which includes retrieving, declassifying and sharing the sealed secret transcript of former ICIG Michael Atkinson; the various intelligence officials who are comfortable weaponizing their positions will continue trying to manipulate American politics. They are continually using the same playbook.
…START HERE!
REFERENCE READING.
- Tulsi Gabbard takes down the NIC
- Tulsi Gabbard takes operational control of the Presidential Daily Briefing.
- Rubio notes Tulsi intercepted an IC impeachment operation.
- Tulsi Gabbard becomes a target – June 2025
.
This is exactly what we’ve been revealing to the American people. This is what the Deep State does.
Politically motivated weaponization of their position in the IC, submitting a baseless complaint and then burying it in highly classified information to create 1) false intrigue,…
— Alexa Henning (@alexahenning) February 2, 2026
This is not true and is one of the most disgusting cases of clickbait I have ever seen.
There was absolutely NO wrongdoing by DNI Gabbard, a fact that @WSJ conveniently buried 13 paragraphs down. Even the Biden-era Intelligence Community Inspector General came to this… https://t.co/F9LMolUXCb
— Olivia Coleman (@DNIspox) February 2, 2026
Like clockwork: DNI Gabbard finds 2020 election fraud, days later the WSJ publishes a cryptic hit piece from anonymous sources. This is the Russiagate/impeachment hoax playbook, ment to divert attention from the DNI’s fight for the truth.
No one is buying this crap in 2026. pic.twitter.com/3P9hp0s428
— Joe Kent (@joekent16jan19) February 2, 2026
This is battlespace prep for Tulsi Gabbard’s 2027 impeachment trial.
Unfortunately true. Unless elections are secured AND good paying jobs become commonly available, the Dems have all three branches locked up. On the ground, I do see folks returning to more enthusiastic Trump support so I’m hopeful.
Fodder for her 2028 VP nomination
My thought exactly.
I hope there is incriminating evidence linking the USPS to GA voter fraud.
There is no way
USPS should be handling ballots 2026 and beyond.
If you want to clean up voter rolls, stop using the USPS to deliver ballots to every tom, dick, and harry that ever lived at the address or fraudulently used your address.
Something is terribly off when you get junkmail in your mailbox with someone else’s name on it but it’s your address it.
Imho, they are corrupt.
Shut them down.
The USPS board of governors is all radicals especially the Karen appointed by Osama.
Since our local usps supervisor retired, a certain newer mail carrier refuses to deliver mail to most of her route, under the auspices of snow. Funny we never had that problem before. Wasn’t USPS’s motto through rain, sleet, ice or snow? Unless of course they were closed due to a blizzard. I bet only demonrats get their mail.
These “allegations” are getting almost comically stupid.
May Director Gabbard continue to serve this nation with
Honor
Honesty
and
Integrity.
Ah, the Wall Street journal.
The political arm of the RHINO party.
Screw off WSJ.
Stopped reading the WSJ a looong time ago, and am glad I did.
“Anonymous whistleblowers should carry the same credibility as their name… ZERO!!! IMESHO, shame on WSJ for publishing that worthless article.
All because CIA Director Ratcliffe is weak sauce.
Tulsi should immediately fire another 30 IC rats. Then Trump should light a very hot fire under Ratcliffe to fire another 30 CIA rats.
Unless there are painful repercussions the IC will not stop this garbage.
If it takes too long to build the justification for firings just open a field office in Alaska and transfer these traitors there. Most all of them will then resign.
My Uncle COULD HAVE Testified that TIN CITY ALASKA
would be a GOOD Destination for them to OPEN an ” Office “
Kotzebue is lovely this time of year.
I was born & raised on the Navy base (now Coast Guard) on Kodiak in 1953. It is the most beautiful place on earth. However, I agree Kotzebue is appropriate for a multi-agency outpost there. Don’t forget that we will IMMEDIATELY need to staff similar outposts in Greenland when when it becomes a territory of the US.
Why do these agencies need to be in Washington DC anyway?
I’m still doing my research & some extended analysis, but I believe Ratcliffe is actually doing his part, in the background, to assist in this effort. I may be wrong, but there are shallow footprints in the sand that indicate he’s doing what he needs to do in this effort. I don’t believe ODNI Gabbard requires some confederate assistance in this endeavor.
Middle of the great State of Greenland’s icecap would be much better.
alternate opinion – better to keep your known enemies close than to keep searching for the unknowns….
Why “”Anonymous”? Tulsi is not afraid to put HER name on reports. What are these Intel “Heroes” afraid of???
I remember when working for a newspaper in our town at an after-school job – got there at 2:30 and work ’til closing, when all the single wraps were on their way to the post office for the out-of-town subscribers; that was my first job there, doing the single-wraps, which was a job my boss just hated but HE always seemed to wind up doing it . . . first, run the single wrap sheets of newsprint with the names and addresses from the Addressograph-Multigraph machine, then lay them out on the table next to a giant jar of glue with a giant swabbing stick that you would run along a sheaf of these addressed individual sheets and then start rolling them up and then using the glue to stick on the corners – first time he showed me how to do it, I was racing along trying to keep pace, getting all kinds of newsprint on my hands and my chin – but after a couple of times, I got to be pretty smooth at it –
there was another paper in our town but my boss was dismissive of it, “that’s a throwaway . . . it WAS a real paper many years ago but now it’s a throwaway” . . .
that is how I am feeling about the WSJ!
Been connecting the dots for years pointing to the Venezuela communists voting software of Smartmatic and Dominion’s role in the ELECTION of OBAMA in 2008 and again, in 2012.
Tulsi is obviously over the target given the incoming flak directed towards her. But, again, if the Trump administration is not going to roll up its sleeves and expose every rotten dark corner of the intel community’s playhouse then stop conning us. We are sick of the inaction and the lack of accountability. Question: why was Ed Martin removed from the Weaponization Working Group by Deputy AG Todd Blanche? And why is Toff Blanche, a registered Democrat, even in the administration? What a mess.
When will Wile E. Coyote ever learn? That ACME dynamite and anvil are sure to blow you up first, then give you a headache later.
The Deep State (CIA, Congress, and Executive Branch moles) need to be brought into the light of day, and frog-walked down the Mall to the Tidal Basin.
…to the Tidal Basin where the concrete blocks with embedded leg chains and cuffs await …
Enough of this BS pussyfooting around. The Democommies are at WAR against this nation and its very foundation. Does the Administration REALLY want it to get to the point where We The People do the dirty, wet work?
The left really is scared of Tulsi.
What Is ‘Crowds on Demand’? US Firm That Pays People to Attend Protests – And How You Can Apply
Crowd on Demand stands at the center of a debate about the role of money in modern activism
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/what-crowds-demand-us-firm-that-pays-people-attend-protests-how-you-can-apply-1741261
https://crowdsondemand.com/
At least this time our enemies refrained from saying Tulsi is an agent of Putin.
For more information and background on what is going on:
https://thedocuments.info/Payload/Outline%20of%20the%20Blueprint%20by%20Derek%20Johnson.pdf
Derek Johnson gives the timeline of events, actors involved, regulations governing bad acts and consequences at this site.