I see President Trump’s point on this quite clearly.
The Big Beautiful Bill (BBB), essentially the 2026 budget and spending package, was passed along party lines because Democrats would not support the cuts to their spending programs which purchased votes. The Democrat opposition to the fiscal spending Continuing Resolution (CR) is essentially just another way to filibuster the BBB that preceded it.
If the Republican Senate would end the filibuster to pass the BBB, then why would the Republican Senate permit the spending filibuster to block the CR which is the spending vehicle to deploy the BBB?
DONALD J TRUMP – “Remember, Republicans, regardless of the Schumer Shutdown, the Democrats will terminate the Filibuster the first chance they get. They will Pack the Supreme Court, pick up two States, and add at least 8 Electoral Votes. Their two objectors are gone!!! Don’t be WEAK AND STUPID. FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT! WIN, WIN, WIN! We will immediately END the Extortionist Shutdown, get ALL of our agenda passed, and make life so good for Americans that these DERANGED DEMOCRAT politicians will never again have the chance to DESTROY AMERICA! Republicans, you will rue the day that you didn’t TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER!!! BE TOUGH, BE SMART, AND WIN!!! This is much bigger than the Shutdown, this is the survival of our Country!”

Hi Ho Silver Away.
So, what if the “republicans” won’t pass this? Would it expose their “RINO” mentality?
Trump is pushing some serious buttons…
His next button should be term limits for Congress.
Make it his mission before leaving office.
They wont scrap their stupid rules for the American people then they should be forced to go home.
Term limits is a look squirrel trap. What we really need -desperately- is election integrity reform.
Honest and fair elections are the very best term limit there can be: rewarding those superstars who come through for the people with continued representation and immediately banishing those who do not.
Otherwise, politicians with zero integrity, installed by enemy combatants against the wishes of the people, will merely quicken their step up to the money trough. Term limits would make the usurpers even worse than they are now, with a limited time to gather their booty and run.. a perpetual lame duck crowd that drops all pretenses of caring about the electorate- because *we* don’t actually elect them.
Those who pull the puppet strings (and fix elections) dangle this red herring knowing full well that, without election integrity, there will be a steady crop of swamp critters hitting the ground to do their bidding.. and with term limits.. in record time!
Tossing out the babies with the bathwater (the few gems who manage to win elections despite their interference) would be music to their ears!
Only fair elections can remedy the problems we face in this country. Everything evil stems from their TREASONOUS COUPS to date. ^This^ should be our primary focus. Don’t get caught up in the noise.
I understand your point. I work with FL General Assembly and Term limits seem to focus the priorities of the legislators.
I like that as they know they are not there for life but a few years.
It would be a nice change for our Article I office holders to recognize.
their rino mentality was exposed a long time ago
but nothing was done about it
I am extremely pleased to see President Trump
call everyone out –
The answer by the GOP Senators to PDT’s directive will showcase the RINOS and corrupt uniparty trash with an “R” after their name
Great minds think alike…🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Just thinking, I am now an old retired guy myself, effective 10/31. I no longer care what my clients think of me, not that I ever really did.
Freedom!!!
Passing President Trump’s agenda, is not necessarily Congress’ agenda.
Thune ia now Johnny on the spot…….what I wonder will he do?
To me, Thune is less of a challenge than Murkowski, Collins, McConnell, Tillis and their ilk.
And Paul
Me thinks Rand Paul was always elected to be an insurance policy
Sometimes it only takes one, remember the McCain
Rand Paul is a ‘muh principles’ blowhard. Somehow, within not one but TWO terms of Donald Trump’s presidency, he never managed to call a recess, when all it takes is ONE Congressman to do so!
Not one of these so-called Republicans will call a recess for even a day so that their president can finally appoint his own cabinet. Not a one.
They can posture and pontificate all they want but they’re ALL swamp. They are merely waiting him (and MAGA) out.
It’s infuriating!
Throw them all out on general principles.
Rand Paul caved after his first re-election bid. The KY RNC put up a tough primary opponent and he almost lost. The KY RNC is controlled by McConnell people the way the AZ RNC is controlled by McCain people. Since then, he has been more that happy to endorse McConnell and toe the line to keep his nice committee appointments. In return he gets to grandstand now and then.
Also, it may be part of the larger Uniparty plan to have Massie and Paul put up these libertarian roadblocks and try and split MAGA.
He does have a jealous ” spot” , him don’t like it, if he’s not invited to the parties by the WH. Best way of saying to him ,you are here because you are an imposter . Spit
They take their orders from McConnell/Thune.
Look at the reality of every concrete move to cut (not cut) spending:
– DOGE Rescission bills in limbo (total identified cuts of waste, fraud and abuse are $220 Billion)
– DOGE seems stuck at $220 Billion in suggested cuts (22% of Goal of $1 Trillion); DODs nearly $1 Trillion budget seems sacrosanct
– OMB (Russ Vaughn) hasn’t enacted any staffing cuts to the non-essential 1.5-million Federal workforce (some token reductions are in limbo as a judge approved a temporary injunction?)
President Trump will historically raise tariff revenues; which sadly will simply be wasted with even more spending.
** Mr. Wonderful, Kevin O’Leary, has suggested that President Trump is considering routing ALL ANWAR revenues and fees to debt reduction; and that financial markets would respond well to that fiscal sanity)
I heard Musk state recently that Doge was still working and finding more and more cuts. It is not in the news because he is not running it daily and therefore not a lighting rod to the Left.
“seems”?
IS.
Don’t you know we’ve got a war in Nigeria to fight?
If they end the filibuster, let’s stop this Continuing Resolution nonsense. Pass a real budget.
An academic dream; too wide a divide to reconcile different visions of spending. Unlikely to be another budget until there have been a few consecutive conservative administrations and a much better educated public.
JMO.
President Trump knows that MAGAs need to recognize the current, changed battlefield and “not fight the last war of 2021”.
Why? Because President Trump has masterfully reshaped the battlefield with the communist democrats / RINOs.
The lynch pin of the reshaping was eliminating their “off-budget” cash caches spread throughout the world and bringing the $$ back to the US Treasury.
The cash caches were the source of the off-budget funding for all of the treasonous, communist / globalists entities within the Executive Branch and by extension, the national democrat party.
He has the democrats and RINOs on the run ……. and it is time to close the deal and complete returning the Executive Branch to be Constitutional Compliant.
Then, using elections, return the Legislative Branch to be Constitutional Compliant.
Then, using appointments, return the Judicial Branch to be Constitutional Compliant.
Removing the filibuster will help to return the 3 branches of the federal government to be Constitutional Compliant.
The filibuster isn’t in the Constitution ….. it was just a rule the globalists put in later to take away the power of the electorate.
Removing it now will just be one step closer to help return the Senate to be Constitutional Compliant.
President Trump had a vision in 2021 to return the federal government (Constitutional Compliant) to the people. He led his MAGA / American First movement for the past 4 years with that goal.
Removing the filibuster is just the latest step along the way.
MAGA / America First isn’t just our motto, it is our duty!
Even if any of that happens in the next 3 years, it will be permanently erased the next time an election is lost. Much like all the Executive Orders he’s governing by.
Given opposition intent on overthrowing the US system no matter the cost, we don’t want to give them permission and hand them the keys.
If they are going to stack the deck with new one-party states and packed courts, we need to make them start by overthrowing the rules of the system themselves, so it is clear who and what they are doing. Not laying the ground-work.
Returning the 3 branches to be constitutionally compliant means nothing when the opposition aims to use the constituion in the current culture to cement permanent power.
rharkonen113,
Thanks for the comment.
JMO.
Looks like you have been living under the unconstitutional rules that the globalists / communists have maneuvered into our federal government, over the past century, due to actions by the globalists / communists in the legislative and judicial branches as well as some cooperative globalist president’s like bush (I and II), clinton, o-bummer, biden …… you have been living under them for so long that you have lost touch with the protections built into our Constitution.
You are not alone.
Many politicians, many jurists, so-called legal scholars and professors and many citizens will swear by the maze of unconstitutional rules, laws, agreements, etc, etc that make up today’s federal government ……. failing to recognize that the globalist / communists, over the past century, have used those unconstitutional items to construct them into a Gordian Knot around our Constitution. President Trump is wielding the sword of the people’s mandate to cut the knot.
For reference: from one of the founding fathers , President Thomas Jefferson wrote:
“A strict observance of the written law is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. To lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to the written law, would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property and all those who are enjoying them with us; thus absurdly sacrificing the ends to the means.” 1,2
footnotes:
1. Jefferson, Writings (Washington Ed. of 1853), vol. 5, p. 542. 2. Brest, Paul; Sanford Levinson; Jack M. Balkin; Akhil Reed Amar; Reva B. Seigel (2006). Processes of Constitutional Decision making: Cases and Materials (Print) (6th ed.). New York: Aspen. pp. 65–67.
_____________________________________________________
Thomas Jefferson knew that at some point in America’s future, treasonous traitors would take over the law-and-order and judicial functions of the DC centered federal government and would try to overthrow our Constitutional Republic by using a maze of unconstitutional rules, laws, agreements, etc, etc that would be used to override the Constitution.
He said those must be ignored.
Have a great MAGA DAY!
MAGA / America First isn’t just our motto, it is our duty!
I understand you have a theory of the world and see this as fitting into it, as everything must.
When a fraudulent election gives Dems a majority and they start adding left-wing states and expanding the supreme court such that no further election will alter anything, the constitution will be ornamental at best, having served its purpose of legally facilitating its own demise at the hands of people very different from those who wrote it.
One can continue adhering to something that will rapidly fade away, but it won’t be possible to ignore it anymore than you could fly on a plane without a mask during COVID. There will be Rules.
If Dems do these things, the remedy is civil war, and I’m saying its useful to require them to overthrow the rules that lead to that instead of us. If Republicans do it just to get the government going, it will be their shame forever as history points to them as the ones who enabled it. Weak losers caving as usual.
Trump is frustrated because he can’t do things NOW. Apparently needs government money to do what he wants. Unfortunatelty, the things he’s doing NOW (EOs) can be wiped away in a day on Jan. 20, 2028. So he’s a transient figure.
The CR is nothing to be proud of anyway. It’s a Biden budget. Having the government shut-down is a good thing. Why any Republican would feel pressure to cave to Democrats and give them to tools to assume permanent majority instead of using it as an opportunity to cut government is suspicious.
rharkonen113,
Thanks for your comment.
JMO.
I understand that your mission is to try to stop MAGA / America First movement members from supporting President Trump in following his oath of office to support the Constitution by asking the Republicans in the Senate to remove the unconstitutional filibuster in the Senate.
I suspect, if you were on a mission in Spring, 2021, you would have argued just as strong that it was useless for President Trump not to concede the fraudulent 2020 election.
After all, Congress had just inaugurated creepy joe as the 46th president, albeit it was with an unconstitutional shortened certification process in the House. Everyone knows that vote is final.
And the Republican RINOs were rushing to the microphones to falsely accuse him of calling for overthrowing the government on 1/6/21.
They were suggesting pulling all support from him and had the RNC refuse to help him with any campaign funds.
They were also helping the democrats to launch Congressional investigations of him to result in impeachment and charges being forwarded to the DOJ for prosecution.
And the DOJ and the FBI had already launched multiple investigations into his legal actions to “request” recounts in the 2020 election.
And his former AG, Bill Barr, and his former Vice President Pence both accused him of misconduct.
And, look at the not-so-supreme court who rejected all election fraud cases for “no-standing.”
Yup, as a loyal Republican yourself, based on all the unproven accusations, it caused you great pain, but you would have had to criticize President Trump for not conceding the 2020 election ……… with as much force and determination as you do today to try to stop him from supporting removing the unconstitutional filibuster in the Senate.
You were wrong then …… just as you are now.
You see, if the democrats ever did win another election where they controlled all 3 branches of government, they’d face a hostile environment for even trying to introduce any unconstitutional legislation.
Nope, a Constitutional Compliant federal government ain’t like your daddy’s corrupt to the core DC swamp of yore.
Have a great MAGA DAY!
MAGA / America First isn’t just our motto, it is our duty!
Your entire premise is still, trying to convince people there are Democrats and Republicans with opposing agendas.
There is only The UniParty™️.
Their combined agenda is that of abusing us, dividing us, keeping us in a perpetual state of either Fear or Outrage so eventually we demand “solutions” to the “problems”, which government created.
By the government we keep being told we can have, if we just vote better.
I cannot remember where I read this…..”if voting mattered, we would not be allowed to do it”.
Mark Twain?
Treasonous usurpers both foreign and domestic who conspire against the will of the American people and our Constitutional Republic by conducting fraudulent elections that negate the peaceful transition of power are the ones who *created* the UNiparty.
Treasonous usurpers are illegitimate. Fair elections will remove them.
Your well thought out and written assessment is swaying me to your side of the argument. And I agree this is not the hill to nuke the filibuster on. Sun Zu comes to mind. When your enemy is destroying itself don’t get in the way. And make no mistake the Dems are destroying themselves. We finally have the upper hand for once. Let the Dems suffer their arrogant ignorance. The commie in NY should be the final nail in their coffin.
JMO
Invoking Sun Zu in order to justify your unwillingness to fight is pathetic.
Letting the dems take responsibility for govt. shutdown while be able to cut the heck out of wasteful govt is not fighting? Personally I struggle with the best way to proceed.
What’s being cut?
1/20/2029
Yes PT must fight with the rules that the Dems and Globalist have set out…..he can’t strictly adhere to the constitution when they are not….I believe he will by moving in and out of the constitutional restrictions…fooling this foolish party.
Perfect T-Jeff quote and explanation.
It is a human conceit to think a law can be crafted for every last situation.
You do know the rules can be changed AT ANYTIME?
The argument that changing the rules is permanent is an old wives tale told by minority party leaders to sell votes.
The Democrats can kill the filibuster on day one if they take power.
Just like Republicans could have put the rule for judges after Harry Reid changed it when they took the Senate.
They didn’t because it helped the globalist install lifetime judges to circumvent a restoration to constitutional norms.
Food for thought.
Sundance has pointed out that the so-called Republicans prefer to remain in the minority, where they can flail their arms helplessly while pleading for contributions, as well as wheel and deal with the democrats when their crossover votes are necessary.
In the minority, the ‘castrated’ RINOS can remain well-hidden while permitting tyranny and corruption. Once they hold the majority, however, the secret is out- they now have every opportunity but simply NO desire to actually *legislate* MAGA initiatives and cement them for our future.
Better to focus on Democrats. Why Republicans, doing Democrats work for them, when the Democrats are the problem?
Assisting Democrats by ending the filibuster gives them permission to implement an irreversible, terminal agenda for the country the next time they have a bare majority.
New permanent Democrat states, a left-wing Supreme court corrupting the legal system, means permanent Democrat rule into the future even if they just get a bare majority of +1 by election fraud,
Agreed they will do it themselves at next opportunity. But then they would be the ones changing the rules that then ushered in one party rule by those who changed the rule. “How it came to be” undermines what they would attempt to do as being an overthrow of the country, instead of enabling and permitting it in advance.
Use the opportunity to trim back government waste, spending, which is what he actually campaigned on. Need more of that.
A vote to remove the filibuster would return the initiative to the majority party where it belongs, and not in the hands of the minority party where it is being held in captivity. It would thus be the decisive strategic move to make the Dems pay very dearly for their partisan tantrum.
There’s no way to deny that Dems currently have Republicans “in check,” but not checkmate! So, in chess parlance, it’s time to move the Queen in for the kill. Also note that after the CR is approved, Democrat political options will be exactly zero until they try to out-Trump Trump. Yes, that will be their only option after they’re cornered and on the ropes.
Sure, there are risks, but trust me on this, the Dems will never recover from such a move if it were used to full, partisan advantage.
Let’s stop kidding ourselves, Dems are not for America at all! And a group of 100 top boyscout recruits acting as senators would put forth a more pro-American agenda than the red commies currently holding office.
In what way would Dems pay? The CR is a Biden budget. They get what they want plus permission in the future to dismantle US institutions and create a permanent majority. Because that’s what they want to do.
In what way are Dem political options exactly “zero” if the CR is approved? This may refer to the next 6 months. Long term, it gives them everything they need the next time they have a majority. And what they want is irreversible.
For a month.
Relax
Dems fight dirty. Dems will nuke the filibuster any time they see it as an advantage.
It makes no difference whether Rupubs use it or not.
Unless they use their majority to end all no excuse mail in ballots, go to 100% paper ballots, implement voter ID, and same say voting. And appeal Obama care.
Dems don’t need an excuse to end the filibuster ….they don’t care who looks guilty of changing the rules in order to gain total control….THEY DONT CARE….they are going to do it the next time in power….and they will resort to trying to start a civil war if they don’t win the election. I think PT is about timing and he is looking towards a future opportunity to cut cut cut…but obviously he thinks it is more important now to pass the CR. At this point I have no other choice (does anyone) but to trust his judgement and plan.
Im no Const Scholar but I think your right.
They don’t end the filibuster because they do not want it to end until Trump is destroyed, or at least has his winning momentum
slowed down.
This shut-down could be seen as the ultimate win, the rest just nibbling at the margin.
Just may happen. It will definitely put the RINO’s on the spot. They’ll still be able to throw their weight around and obstruct just the same. Although without the cover of having their pals to back them up. This will put all of the pressure and the spotlight on the chaff.
May take awhile.
Trump has laid out a really good case for doing it and all of the reasons make good sense.
yes, if they end the filibuster, what is to prevent 6-8 RINOS from voting with the Dems? Thus we still lose.
Good to see it if it’s gonna occur, now
Curious to see the folks here for whom keeping the government funded and open is now Very Very Important.
Even important enough to risk the future of the country on a bet that Democrats will never get back into power with a +1 majority and zip down the path Republicans cleared for them to permanently empower themselves with new liberal states, new Supreme Court, etc.
You must have missed “obamacare” and the Democrat tax bill that originated in the Senate through parliamentary gimmicks and reconciliation.
So the goal is to make it easier for them next time? Dems move as a block, Reps don’t. Dem +1 majority will act, Republican majorities cannot be counted on.
Democrats can change the rules regardless of what republicans do.
Just like Republicans can put the Judges rule back in place if they love it so much.
Notice they don’t?
Your logic is meant to be a trap to keep you from demanding Senate Republicans pass The Trump agenda.
It’s like Harry Reid never happened with some of them.
It won’t be any easier for the Dems later. They’ve hit the violent revolution stage. If the Republicans don’t nuke the filibuster to get President Trump’s agenda through the Dems will certainly do it themselves if they are able to seize power again.
You’re asking to handicap MAGA out of a mistaken belief the other side is still interested in rules or appearance. They have torn off the masks. It is only about power now.
Sundance,
Don’t use actual examples.
It blows people minds and their arguments this early in the morning.
👍
Rick Scott was my choice for Senate Leader.
🙂
I agree. He has much skills.
🚩 law Rick? No thank you.
Harry Reid took a House bill, stripped out its contents (but retained the title of the original bill) and replaced that with the Obamacare legislation thereby supposedly satisfying the “all spending bills originate in the House” provision of the COTUS. Very devious and smarmy.
Yes. Because it is better to always lose with honor.
The Republican Way.
Don’t forget to send us more money! We’ll get ’em next time!
The Dems will do all of which you speak regardless of the Republican move right now…..Trump has a plan I just pray he is on the right path.
though i agree that nuking the filibuster would b the quickest solution, I also see it as the most dangerous…. God forbid the dems ever get control of the senate again, they would use it to implement marxism/communism and all manner of evil, extreme ideology, corruption and fraud in ways we have yet to see.
This is probably the only time that I agree w thune and johnson…. I would be meeting daily w the dems most likely to change their nay vote to a yes. Garner Fetterman’s support to change votes…
If PDJT throws down the gauntlet, ending this charade, then with fair voting and near elimination of mail in ballots, the dems and rino’s will forever be memorialized in the dung heap of history
Sad thing is they will do all manner of evil with or without – a filibuster , a majority , a CR , an actual budget , on and on .
I voted for President Trump . He is correct 99% of the time . And if Sundance agrees with it , Rock on .
Everyone says : What if the democrats get back in power ? What if they pack the Supreme Court ? Etc etc .
I voted for Donald Trump. He is moving mountains . Right now the democrats are just a bump in the road .
I say let him finish it .
The Democrats do not represent a popular majority in this country. True The Vote in the big Democrat metro areas, and they will never win another Federal election.
Federal Election Reform is essential this winter. How can that be achieved? Nuke the ‘Filibuster’ and use the National Guard.
He’s absolutely right.
Yes, I think the President is right and it’s time to throw down. It’s time to win today’s battles and gain every possible inch of ground.
And tomorrow it will be necessary to regroup and do it again….and again and, if needed, again until sanity and constitutional integrity are restored and democrats are driven to unconditional surrender.
Congress needs to heed the call of their President, the nation’s Commander In Chief, and fight.
We need to raise our voices as one and loudly demand that they heed that call.
It’s time to build the momentum redouble the push for victory.
Rock on !
If the President wants to win he is going to have to bring out “the seven ways to Sunday” information against the republicans.
Right now MAGA is suffering from irrational exuberance with respect for our survival post Trump.
If the President used the seven ways to Sunday to get the RINOs to fall inline then I say have at it…he needs to start playing hard ball . I agree 100%.
End the filibuster and then enact and pass voter ID for federal elections. That will put a stop to most voter fraud.
Gosh that would make too much sense for the RINOs …or take away too much of their power…
To me, the filibuster, as undemocratic as it is, is really the last sliver of “unity” we have left in this country. It’s the only procedure that prevents the majority party from running rampant over the rest of the country. I don’t doubt that the Communists, at their next opportunity, will shut it down.
So I agree with nuking it – IF – the goal is total war on the Communist Party – a sustained, multi-year dedicated war to destroy the leftists in this country. Anything short of the goal of total dedication to eliminating communists in America will render this pointless. If instituted, this has to be a war-like policy – ridding the country of the threat of communism.
And let’s not forget that the leftists are actually our lesser enemies. The real, existential threat, are the Muslims. They must be completely removed from this country if America is to survive.
“And let’s not forget that the leftists are actually our lesser enemies. The real, existential threat, are the Muslims.”
They have in fact united. We are facing a Green-Red attack against America. They have already hijacked one major Party. The next Mayor of NYC is the prototype. It is an Islamic-Communist existential threat to the Nation, underway.
Both wings must be thoroughly and completely destroyed.
Or they will destroy America.
There are also anti-America on the Right…not just RINOs.
They infiltrate true Right-wing Conservative Orgs and then try to destroy that org from within with their negative ideas, conspiracy theories, “we are doomed” attitudes. MAGA has some of these within it now.
They hate America as much as the Muslims and the Left do.
PT has the ability to deport in this situation but the response would be a big backlash by the commie youth and a good % of the progressive left of the dem party. I wonder if it would be worth it? ….it may well be worth it to rid us of this enemy. Trump’s call.
Globalist control the muslims…..
Or the contrary.
Is POTUS still planning A NEW CENSUS, stripping out many illegal immigrants and adding 10-15 new GOP seats?
This seems to be a potential blockbuster move.
AND HOW ABOUT AN ACTUAL LEGITIMATE ESTIMATE OF OUR ILLEGAL ALIEN POPULATION??!!
– The Feds have estimated 12 million for decades
– The Feds were off by 3.5 when Reagan was President
– a consulting firm estimated 20 million around 2000
– Yale and MIT did a study a few years back w a mean estimate of 22 million, and a range between 16 and 28 million?
– All this before the Autopen Administration enticed in 10 – 20 million more
60 Million is my humble estimation. Our Republic couldn’t publish straight numbers on anything if our lives depended on it. Pretending is our specialty.
Did you include the ones that came in on VISAS and their families?
No.
Redistricting would also add many seats….the RINOs in the red states ..some are holding this up…They really like being in the losing party which results in no accountability for dem policy decisions. Hope they change this way of thinking when they consider where the dem party is heading right now. They will destroy the Republican party if back in power. The Dems will take down the RINOs place in the power structure. RINOs have allot to think about.. this is not the same game.
I’ve noticed a pattern in this Administration. Every time President Trump fires up the Steamroller to handle Domestic Criminal Negligence, some sort of International Whodunnit unfolds, he ends up on AF1 for 3 wks and nothing happens Nationally and these Manufactured Crises sneak up on The President, as the rest of us duck before walking into the bandsaw.
All I’ve learned is we lose every time we are told the Republican’ts “will Do The Right Thing, this time, we promise.. pinky swear”..
Correct , but I assure you no one is playing our VSGPDJT.
It hasn’t even been a year . We will hammer them into dust in the next 3.
Until the midterms….
Your enthusiasm needs to be tempered….
The ENEMY gets another tug at the wheel of power….
If we ALLOW them to succeed, it’s O-V-E-R….
Our current tactical advantage is tenuous at best….
WE NEED TO FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT!!!!!
We have to stomp these fools (politically) or die tryin’ Sir!! They will give us No Quarter.
We SHALL give them….
NO MERCY!
What does VSG mean, Jeff?
Very Stable Genius.
Thank you Arnold Ziffels Older Brother.
Yep. UniParty still controls DC
Is this a case of, do unto others before they do unto you?
The curious thing is, I see these cut thru the chaff/Susie Wiles takes on issues/situations, but then on other issues/topics there seems to be an impregnable force field Susie Wiles has put up.
Yes, I understand he is frustrated with DOJ/Blondi, but why is Todd Blanche still not gone or counting paperclips. If Blondi is in fact staying in Florida except for big stuff, force her to stay in protected military housing in DC. If Cash is in Vegas, put him in military housing in DC.
Sorry, just a middle of night ramble here.
Susie Wiles is gonna Susie Wiles no matter …The way to get threw is hammer the Trump kids.
Uniparties primary mission is to run out the clock on Trump term and steal another election for the socialists. In Thune they trust. Mitch’s gift that will keep on giving.
did not know R had to change filibuster already earlier for BBB
“Reconciliation” drops the filibuster rule once a year.
The Senate rules for cloture requiring 60 votes can stand with the exception of clean Continuing Resolutions that do not require an increase or decrease in spending. It is similar to the Harry Reid modification in 2013 that excepted Federal judges and executive office appointments that did not affect current spending levels.
If the Democrats had just voted the clean CR on Sept. 18, they would have had until now (43 days) to work out their issues with the Repubs. But, No! They had to cram their $1.2 trillion wish list on a take-it-or-leave-it basis because they didn’t have a strong argument for restoring what both parties voted out last spring.
Preach on, brother.
Just make it about spending bills and pass a budget for once.
I remember Harry Reid pulling the nuclear option.
WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE REPUBLICANS?!!
Get off your laurels and do the right thing!
And as an aside, I am very disappointed in Rand Paul (and Massie by the way). Why are you Republicans if we can’t count on your votes?
They’re republican’ts because they cannot get elected as libertarians.
They make too much as Republicans to dress like Libertarians.
Rand Paul is an embarrassment to his father.
I thought when he got whacked on the head (cutting his grass) he might’ve changed his attitude, but he’s proved (proven?) he’s still a weasel.
Terminate the filibuster before the Democrats do — break the gridlock, reopen government, and win!
“Keep government funded and running at all costs!” … apparently now the MAGA rallying cry.
It’s clear by now to everyone who the RINOs are. We are offered two choices by the political powers that be, Pretend Rs or Ds.
Just like bank robbers, politicians go where the money is. They are also amoral psychopaths devoid of conscience.
There is one way to fix this. Each campaign is limited to six weeks to put forth their agenda and each is limited to a finite amount spent.
For example each Presidential campaign 5mil, Senate 2mil, congress 500k.
If you want to donate beyond the set limit, it will pay down national debt.
Require all candidates to put finances in a blind trust.
Or some variation thereof.
End …Citizens United
I’m a skipping CD, but the US needs to cut $1,800 billion just to get to a balanced annual budget, the point where we stop adding to the national debt principal. We only bring in $5,200 billion a year and are spending $7,000 billion in 2025.
DOGE cuts are 10% of the way there, and no one wants even that much. Frankly, we need austerity measures immediately.
There is about a $37,000 billion debt principal on the books, with about $1,200 billion in annual interest. So almost 2/3 our overspend is interest expense, which is cascading (interest paid with debt creating more interest, etc). THAT’s why Trump is shouting fed interest rate to lower, so that debt could be refinanced, just to ease the level of drastic cuts.
But every time the interest rate goes down, the legislature starts to spend spend spend. And we can’t even get a balanced budget, much less a surplus to start paying down the principal.
Isn’t that what President Trump is trying to achieve per tariffs, etc.?
“Where’s the money, Marv??”.. “tell me you gambled and I’ll give you the money to put the heat back on”..
I think you meant Trillion instead of Billion.
Thank you for the way you described the debt. Speaking for myself (“and I am unanimous on this”[Are You Being Served? British sitcom from the ‘olden days’] it is easier to grasp “thousands of billions” than 1.X trillions.
this site has some good information on large number: https://www.thoughtco.com/millions-billions-and-trillions-3126163
1000 Million = Billion. 1000 Billion = Trillion Are you saying 1.8 Trillion for a balanced budget or are your #s just reference.
Yes, those are the numbers coming out of the U S Treasury.
1.78 trillion, or 1,780 billion, or 1,780,000 million. Or 1,780,000,000,000 USD. Mind boggling.
https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/national-deficit/
God bless and protect President Trump.
Amen!
Amen!
Is ending the filibuster the Dems end game in this entire govt shut down?
Boys and girls, this is a war. A cold war, getting increasingly warm, against Heritage America.
Enough with the Marquis of Queensbury rules. You crush the other side with every tool at your disposal.
Because they have already shown they will do the same to you.
END THE FILIBUSTER.
Get rid of the BS cowardly rule and put a halt to the nonsense. The BS rule is designed to protect cash flow for corrupt activities by members of the elite club. It is not a Constitutional requirement.
Roughly-
Democracy is rule by the majority.
Republic is rule by quorum.
The left want Democracy, let us give it to them.
Democracy is two wolves and one sheep voting on what to have for lunch.
Yet there were five Mail-In Ballots. Baa-ad!
Fox’s Decision Desk calls it for Owl Gore!
<chuckles>
Their “Democracy” is “Death to America”.
Ask yourself: what would Thomas Jefferson do?
That’s your answer to their “Democracy”.
Give them nothing, take from them everything.
Won’t ending the filibuster hurt Republicans the next time democrats hold congress and the presidency?
The Demons would toss the filibuster and burn down America on Day One given the chance. They will not be given the chance, Hallelujah!
The filibuster is an un-Constitutional super-majority requirement, established by an end-run, not an Amendment. Blue Slips are also illegal, as the Constitution says advice and consent of “the Senate”, not “a senator”.
#FakeRepublicans passed the BBB knowing that filibuster would thwart it.
Our President just called their bluff.
2 Samuel 7
Good is the Word of the Lord!
Amen my Brother He has a plan for good that is how we ought to see it. I’d bet hes on the phone with all those in need of a TUNE UP. Even when the Dimms are in the rest of the world wants to come here.
A good majority of the members of the Senate read “advise and consent” as “dictate and control”.
The guaranty of democrat filibuster gives republicans an excuse for never passing genuinely conservative legislation. If they eliminate the filibuster, they would not have any excuses. They’ll never do it.
The filibuster is unconstitutional, violating the Constitution’s implicit commitment to majority rule. President Trump has urged Senate Republicans to end the filibuster to pass legislation during government shutdown debates, echoing broader calls for constitutional compliance and majority rule.
The filibuster functions as a tool of minority rule, undermining democratic accountability. So, end the filibuster but also secure the elections before the mid-terms so the will of the people is represented and democrats will never hold all three branches of power again. Then the work continues on getting rid of left wing “republicans”.
The Constitution of the United States codifies the requirement for supermajority support for major changes to the system such as constitutional amendments and the addition of new states. A simple majority is not enough.
The senate filibuster is meant to do the same thing. It is designed to prevent wild swings in the law that do not have broad popular support. Is that system abused by both parties?…yes. But having the federal government unable to act is generally not a bad thing.
re: “…the Constitution’s implicit commitment to majority rule”:
“The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.”
The US Constitution’s requirements for a super-majority are limited to:
There’s something missing from this list of the Constitution’s Super-Majority requirements;
the 3/5ths majority Senate vote requirement called the “filibuster”.

The Constitutional Option–CATO: “The filibuster of judicial nominees upsets the balance the framers struck. The Constitution is run through with checks and balances, designed to limit power on one hand, but allow government to go forward on the other. The filibuster intrudes on that design by adding an extra check. But it’s not without costs. No doubt today’s Democrats think they know better how to strike the right balance than the framers did. Republicans are saying the framers got it right. I’d go with the framers. Let’s give these nominees the up-or-down vote they deserve, as plainly contemplated by the Constitution.”…….
Yes, the Senate is in charge of its rules–but adding another supermajority requirement not found in the Constitution is an illegitimate amendment to that charter. If the Senate can demand 60 votes to vote, then why not 70? or 80? Or even 100?
It’s not about debate, either. The “Silent Filibuster” is routinely invoked, almost never the “Talking Filibuster”.
Senate Curtain-Measurer Harry Reid already announced his plan to abolish the filibuster when arrogant Democrats were cock-sure of their pre-scheduled victory. We should take him at his word, quit playing games with the Constitution and kill this extra-legal abomination once and for all. Let your yeas be yeas and your nays be nays and live with it. 4 out of 5 dentists recommend we follow the Constitution for a change.
No more Un-Constitutional One-Man Treaties–or Forty-One Man Senate Vetoes! Abolish the Filibuster Now!
“Democracy Dies in Harry Reid’s Crawlspace, Like All the Others!”
Rest in the Vine: Abolish the Filibuster, Not the Electoral College
Rest in the Vine: Re: the Filibuster–A Word Derived from “Piracy”
They also need to stop this continuing resolution ploy to hold hostage the goverment and get back to the Constitutional mandated budget. This is the fundamental change BO forced on America and it is sowing chaos. Exactly what the Marxists want.
I can’t afford an entertainment budget because I pay too much in tax, so I want to keep the filibuster because it’s entertainment that I can’t afford otherwise.
We’ve always known that the filibuster has become synonymous with political theater. My problem with doing away with the filibuster is that the simp GOP are unable to use their majorities as the socialists will because they are saddled with losers like Paul, Collins, and Tillis. There are too many self-interested RINOs who want to make headlines and get loving pats from the socialist-controlled media by taking a stand against the party. The GOP practically has to have a 60-40 majority to be confident that anything will pass.
Do you remember why the 0bamacare subsidies being championed by the socialists are even part of this situation? A RINO named John McCain stabbed the entire country in the back when he cast the deciding vote against ending the program.
When the socialists regain power, as they inevitably will, you can bet that they will use their majorities to pass laws that will undo everything PDJT47 has accomplished thus far, plus whatever the follow-on administration does (Vance, Rubio, Meatball, etc.). If you think the predictions for NYC under the mad mullah mayor Mamdani are dire, wait until Klobuchar or Shapiro becomes president with socialist majorities in the House and Senate. The entire country will suffer for generations because republicans just can’t get it together.
Newscum whines about PDJT ending elections, but that’s more socialist projection. Given the chance, the socialists will codify the old maxim that says, “It doesn’t matter who votes, it matters who counts the votes.”
Thanks for publishing this, Sundance.
This needs to be the solution. No more filibuster for spending bills. We havent passed all 12 appropriations bills on time since 1997. Yet our runaway debt is now $37 trillion. All because of the filibuster
Think about it this way:
Republicans scrapped the filibuster for Supreme Court, appellate, and district court judges, GIVING THEM LIFETIME SEATS THAT SHAPRE THE LAW FOR DECADES. But they insist on keeping the filibuster for appropriations and budget bills.
They do so out of fear of losing that weapon when the majority flips, ignoring that Democrats could change the rule regardless of what they do today and that clinging to this parliamentary rule only makes Republicans more likely to lose the majority.
What it really does is allow the minority leader to sell votes and costs the American taxpayers and it needs to stop.
Republicans can stop this madness in one day.
And yes, I know Democrats (Reid) scrapped it for judges first.
But, the Republicans could have inserted the rule back in place when they took power back. It only takes a simple majority vote to change the rules.
They own it just as much as Democrats.
Yes–it’s a beard to hide the UniParty Bunco Scam from the marks.
Then let’s get on with the program President Trump ….and you know what ….You are not alone you have the majority of the the American people.
Why can’t they just move on and pass the budget bills?
Because the person that hands out clean towels in the senate bathroom has been furloughed
Am I the only one that is confused by this article about what is a filibuster and a continueing resolution? Is the filibuster the 60 vote requirement to pass the coninuing resolution that would allow the government to reopen? Does PDJT really want to end the filibuster? If the filibuster is ended, then many evil things may happen. Why end the filibuster, open the government for short term gains but create a nightmare? I am really confused.
What evil things might happen?
You don’t think that a Democrat majority won’t implement a nuclear option, because weak Republicans didn’t? Gullible. When you have power, you use it.
This is a genuine war now. Against Islamic-Communists that Obamaites engineered to topple America from within. You use every tool at your disposal to save the Nation.
If the nuclear option is ended as the article and PDJt suggest so that the contunuing resolution can pass and the government is reopened, the the evil things that will happen when the Democrats get a majority in the Senate and House, they will pack the Supreme Court and pass their legislation. As I am writing that it makes me realize that is how good government functions, i.e., it represents the majority of the population. I don’t think I am guillible, Oldersoul, but am confused by the article.. In an above post Mrs. Sunshine says that the fillibuster is a tool of the minority. Somehow I associated government stability with the fillibuster becuase the Republican seldom have a majority and a fillibuster allowed them to prevent undersirable changes in government programs.
Do you want the fillibuster to end?
Do you remember Harry Reid?
Don’t be gullible twice. Vindictive Democrats will do all those “evil things” regardless of what this Republican Congress does. It’s not even the same Democrat Party of Harry Reid anymore. It’s now far worse. Even Harry Reid wouldn’t be welcome in this Democrat Party.
Wake up out of your rules stupor. One major Party has been hijacked by Islamic-Communist revolutionaries intent on tearing down the Nation. The last six years should have given you a glimpse of what they have planned should they ever hold perpetual power.
And the other Party is still bought and owned by corporate America, Wall Street, and K Street. Weak harlots that only respond to fear and money.
This Congressional government is dysfunctional. It represents the majority of its donors, not its citizens (a profoundly different group than “population”).
The only thing holding America together right now is the superstructure of the Constitution itself, and an ever-awakening and mobilizing Heritage Citizenry. The latter is what is going to save it.
And his handle is Sundance.
Sounds like you are right on all counts. Dems are filibustering the republican continuing resolution bill. The senate needs 60 votes to “end debate” on the bill before it is put up for a vote.
I believe that ending the senate filibuster rule is a terrible idea. I think waiving it for judicial appointments and executive nominees is reasonable (elections have consequences), but I’d keep it place for all legislation other than budget reconciliation.
Thanks for helping me understand, Joshua2415. I asked Chatgpt “can the filibuster rule be waived for some thing but not other?” and it gave me a wholesome answer. Yes, it can. Here is more AI describing the constitutional option or nuclear option:
AI Overview
The primary downside to permanently keeping the “nuclear option” in place (which eliminates the filibuster and allows for simple majority rule on all matters) is the elimination of the Senate’s traditional role as a check on the majority and the potential for increased political instability and polarization.
Key downsides include:
I asked for the proper name for the nuclear option and here is the reply:
The “nuclear option” is not a single, formal procedure but a term for a parliamentary maneuver that allows a majority in the Senate to override a minority’s filibuster. It can also be called the “constitutional option,” a term used to argue that changing the rules on a simple majority vote is consistent with the Constitution’s requirement for the Senate to give “advice and consent” on nominations. The name “nuclear option” was coined because it was seen as a drastic last resort with potentially major consequences.
Nuclear option vs. “constitutional option”
Lastly, I am pleasantly overshelmed with using AI. My brother put me on to using it. His favorite thing is to challenge AI and hear the response.
No. We should be fighting to end CRs and forcing Congress to pass real budgets. This is stalling tactic by both sides to delay passing said budgets.
How many times have they done it this year? 2-3? “Oh we just need more time!” they whine.
And every time we get screwed over by another CR. With no CR, they’ve had PLENTY of time to simply finish the fricking bills they would be passing every year.
Hokkoda, I agree that continueing resolutions are a sloppy way to govern and the Congress should pass a budget every year or maybe every couple of years. How do you think this government shut down will end?
38 Trillion in debt and the major programs of Social Security and Medicare set to go belly up. When the US can no longer borrow and real cuts are forced, stand back.
It really is wonderful to wake up in the morning and find that a majority of the Treehouse agrees with you! Let’s end the filibuster, and in the process the U.S. Senators will have to stop grandstanding, get off their rear ends, and start functioning as members of a working parliamentary body.
Sounds good to me, Paul. Let’s do it!!!
“… Don’t be WEAK AND STUPID. …”
🤣🤣🤣 Too late!
I can imagine collins, murky, tollis, mcconnell, lankford turning around and voting no on the CR.
I have a better idea, how about CONgress actually do it’s job and pass a budget in 2026 for a change. How about President Trump signs an executive order that CONgress doesn’t get paid because they aren’t essential to anything and another one that states if there is no budget passed the country will revert to the spending levels of the last Constitutionally passed budget until a new budget is passed. Let them fight that out in court.
The plan was to “paul ryan” Trump this term just like in the first term. They are moving along at Congressional speed to lose the mid-terms and set the lame ducks loose. All of those trillions will be spent either way. The globalists just don’t want it to be Trump’s way.
The very important differnce between 45 and 47 is the team PDJT chose to govern the nation. In 45 he had mostly a bunch of losing, wimpy, mama’s boys amd in 47 he has the real thing. It doesn’t get much better than Stephen Miller, Russ Vought, Marco Rubio, Tulsi Gabbard, Lee Zeldin. I could go on and on.