The ever-dramatic Margaret Brennan is in full pearl-clutching mode as she questions NATO Secretary General, Mark Rutte, about the upcoming meeting between horrible President Trump and even more horrible President Putin. It is simply unfathomable to allow a U.S. President to create a strategic reset with a Russian President.
As Brennan acts out the role, she highlights how it is unimaginable, terrible, and just a no good bad thing. Horrid.
NATO Secretary Rutte is quite happy with the new funds flowing into the NATO alliance as organized by President Trump. Rutte sits atop a new cache of taxpayer funded treasure for the alliance to organize; from his perspective Trump is gold, and Brennan gnashes her teeth throughout.
Funnily, Brennan attempts to spin a Trump-Putin agreement for a ceasefire with Trump triggering World War III by getting the beginning of a peace deal over the finish line. If Trump creates peace, the world will explode or something. WATCH:
Rutte missed the opportunity to ask Mrs Brennan if she can hear herself. lol
[Transcript] – MARGARET BRENNAN: We turn now to NATO Secretary General, Mark Rutte, who joins us from The Hague in the Netherlands. Welcome back to Face The Nation.
NATO SECRETARY GENERAL MARK RUTTE: Margaret, it’s good to be back on the show. Good morning.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Good morning. Well, Mr. Secretary General, big picture here; is Russia’s Vladimir Putin still a direct threat to the Western alliance, or is he showing some signs of dropping his aggression?
SECRETARY GENERAL RUTTE: He is still the main threat to the Western alliance, there’s no doubt. And I think it is very good that President Trump will test him, and we’ll see how far he can get on Friday, starting this process. He basically broke the deadlock, President Trump, in February, starting the dialogue with Putin. I think that was crucial. We had a great NATO Summit under his leadership, committing to 5% defense spending, so that there is a clear signal to our main threat, which is Russia, that we are serious. And then he opened the floodgates, three weeks ago, of American lethal weapons to be delivered into Ukraine, coordinated by NATO and, of course, the secondary sanctions. He started them with putting them on India, which is one of the biggest buyers of Russian oil and gas.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, that is certainly the groundwork being laid. The concern is, of course, as you know, among some critics, that in this conference room in Alaska, we’re going to see a 1938 moment. Where, in an attempt to immediately halt a war, the groundwork is laid for an even bigger conflict because of concessions that are made. Are you comfortable with Ukraine being excluded from these negotiations on Friday?
SECRETARY GENERAL RUTTE: What will happen on Friday is testing Putin by President Trump. And I commend him for the fact that he organized this meeting. I think it is important. And, obviously, when it comes to peace talks, the cease-fire and what happens after that on territories, on security guarantees for Ukraine, Ukraine will have to be, and will be, involved. But on Friday, it is important to see how serious Putin is. And the only one who can do that is President Trump. So, it’s really crucial that a meeting takes place. It will not be the final say on this. There will not be the final deal on this. Of course, Ukraine will have to be involved in Europe, but it is important to start the next phase of this process, putting pressure on the Russians exactly as President Trump has been doing over the last six months.
MARGARET BRENNAN: You’ve been on these calls with President Trump, and I know that he briefed you on what Envoy Witkoff discussed with Vladimir Putin this week. Can you tell us, is Russia still demanding that Ukraine drop its bid for NATO membership?
SECRETARY GENERAL RUTTE: Well, obviously, I cannot go into all the details, that would be strange. But let me assure you the following, that we are all on the same page; the Americans, the Europeans and Ukraine, that when it comes to the geo-strategic position of Ukraine in the future, when it comes to whatever is the size of the Ukrainian military when it comes to NATO’s posture on the eastern flank in countries like Latvia and Lithuania, Estonia, Finland, Poland, that Putin has absolutely no say on any of these issues.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, you’ve said in the past there need to be strong security guarantees for Ukraine. Who is going to provide that if it’s not NATO?
SECRETARY GENERAL RUTTE: Obviously, this is a discussion which is going on for some months now. We all pray for the moment when the ceasefire is there, and hopefully a successful peace deal is done, but at least a ceasefire. And the Europeans, led by the French and the Brits and NATO, has been involved in those talks, but clearly led by Macron of France and Starmer, the Prime Minister of United Kingdom, in close cooperation with the US, are discussing, post-the-ceasefire, post-the-peace-deal, how do we make sure that the security guarantees are in place? And this will be important also post-next-Friday, if this would lead the Friday session to more serious peace talks, because when it comes to territory, it will always go hand in hand with the security guarantees for Ukraine.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So, I understand that there were NATO representatives listening in that meeting with Vice President Vance and European national security advisors yesterday. NATO has been coordinating the delivery of weapons purchased by NATO members to help out Ukraine. About a billion in military aid, I understand, has been facilitated from the US to Ukraine. Are there plans that those weapons deliveries will continue, regardless of what happens on Friday?
SECRETARY GENERAL RUTTE: Absolutely, they will continue. So, we had the first two packages committed by the Dutch and then by the Scandinavians. I expect further announcements in the coming days and weeks. And this is crucial. Basically, President Trump, as I said, opening the floodgates of lethal military aid into Ukraine again. Paid by the Europeans and Canada, which I think is only logical and fair. And this process has started, of course, on top of what the Europeans are already doing, including investing in the defense industrial base in Ukraine. And, as you said, NATO is coordinating all of this through our commands in Wiesbaden, making sure that Ukraine has what it needs to stay in the fight and be in the best possible position when it comes to negotiations on a ceasefire, slash a peace deal.
MARGARET BRENNAN: And that’s not up for negotiation on Friday?
SECRETARY GENERAL RUTTE: My absolute conviction on Friday is that this is President Trump making sure that Putin is serious, and if he is not, then it will stop there. If he is serious, then from Friday onwards, the process will continue. Ukraine getting involved, the Europeans being involved. And the US is already coordinating, like you said, last night in London, with Foreign Minister Lammy of the United Kingdom, senior officials from NATO and European countries in the European Commission, with the Vice President, to make sure that we are all on the same page. Putin will never, ever be able to divide the alliance. The biggest foreign policy success of President Trump is the NATO Summit. A United NATO, a united alliance, and Putin will never get in between us.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, we have to take President Trump at his word, and on Friday, when he spoke in front of the cameras, he said there will be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both Ukraine and Russia. I mean, you know, Ukraine does not hold Russian land, and Russia has about 20% of Ukraine. What is he talking about?
SECRETARY GENERAL RUTTE: Clearly, what will be on the table when real peace talks, slash the ceasefire discussion, will take place is this issue of, on the one hand, security guarantees, on the other hand, how to deal with the factual situation that the Russians are holding, at this moment, Ukrainian territory. Crucially important here is that when it comes to this holding of Ukrainian territory, that there might be a factual situation that they are doing this, but that we can never accept that in a legal sense, in,, as this is called, a de jure sense, as you know, the US hosted embassies with Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia between 1940 and 1991 acknowledging that the Soviet Union was controlling those territories, but never accepting, in a legal sense, in a de jure sense, that fact. So all these issues will be on the table, hopefully, post-Friday, if Putin is serious, and Putin then has to commit to sit down with Zelensky. He cannot do this through President Trump. In the end, it has to be, as President Trump has stated himself, a three-way conversation, at least, with the Europeans heavily involved.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So, do I understand what you’re saying here correctly? When you are talking about legal recognition versus de facto, are you saying that, basically, the world is preparing to allow Russia to hold on to Crimea, the Donbas, the eastern part of Ukraine, but then just not legally recognize it?
SECRETARY GENERAL RUTTE: No. What I’m saying is that, in the end, the issue of the fact that the Russians are controlling, at this moment, factually, a part of Ukraine has to be on the table, that any discussion going forward from there will be with Ukrainians deciding on what they want to do in terms —
MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay, because that sounds like you’re saying they don’t have to withdraw their troops.
SECRETARY GENERAL RUTTE: Obviously, they have to, but factually, they are controlling a part of Ukraine at this moment, as you said. And as Ukrainians have said before, if a ceasefire discussion takes place as soon as possible, and hopefully negotiations on a peace deal, there will be the debate on how to take that forward, starting at the present line of contact. But it is crucial to know that when it comes to the future geopolitical situation of Ukraine, their sovereignty, there will be no infringement on that, and that it’s always Ukraine itself deciding on what they want to do or not want to do in terms of a peace deal.
MARGARET BRENNAN: All right, Secretary Rutte, thank you for your time.
[END TRANSCRIPT]


NATO: The Case To Get Out Now
https://ronpaulinstitute.org/nato-the-case-to-get-out-now/

Here’s saying Europe will never pay their fair share….. 3% I will not live long enough to see it.
The existential threat of Russia did not move their spending at all? Soon the EU will not be able to field an army. The Islamists will turn on them. Germany has entered a deep recession even with fudged numbers.
Fabian Socialism.

Canada’s Carney nods his head in agreement, dear friend.
“Muslim values are Canada’s values,” he announces.
And suddenly I am nauseous…
Christians, be warned.
Carney is too cowardly to sentence ANYone to death for apostasy.
He’ll admit so many then turn the country over to Sharia courts. As the UK has done…86 and counting. They will then hand out their own “justice”.
Sound a bit extreme, Yinzer?
I never foresaw these countries would get to this point. I’m waiting…
Unless perhaps you are determined to be judicially deceased and eligible for participation in organ harvesting?
We need to start looking for the modern day Charles Martel/Jan Sobieski.
George Bernard Shaw?
Are you sure that wasn’t Adolf Hitler?
Same Socialist ideology. Wall St bankrolled the National Socialists for a very important and evil reason. The Holocaust
Reminds me of why Teddy Roosevelt called GB Shaw a “blue-rumped ape”.
🤦♀️ 🤦♀️ Oh boy🥴
Right off the bat..reading the transcript…
🤣 The 5% NATO spending…….
he and others seem to always forget to
mention what I believe is a major point….
🤷♀️ 🤷♀️ The 5% is to be reached by year 2035.
🙄 🙄 🙄
It’s a wait President Trump out move.
It’s right here in official NATO publication
under…The 5% Defence Commitment.
NATO – Topic: Funding NATO
Last updated Aug. 1, 2025
Rutte does not want peace.
NATO membership for Ukraine has
always been a red line for Russia.
President Trump is trying to negotiate
peace🕊️🕊️and at the same time Rutte is
giving a speech saying ….
….there is a irreversible path for Ukraine to join NATO…
Beginning of video…hear him say it.
Mark Rutte’s Flip-Flop Game on Ukraine’s NATO Membership EXPOSED! |Critics SLAM NATO’s Mixed Signals – YouTube
🤷♀️ 🤷♀️ Rutte is one of those—Deck chairs of the Titanic—
of the globalist EU elites- that they just shuffle and rearrange.
Mark Rutte hands in resignation as Dutch government collapses over asylum row | Netherlands | The Guardian
Me—🤷♀️🤷♀️
EU is taking its final gasps for oxygen.
A bright 💡 idea ….that has now gone dim.
And it was all the doing of those who were
running the 🤡 show.
Just like The Marshal Plan…EU is past its expiration date 🤣
This article is interesting…..
History of the European Union – 1945-59 | European Union
My thanks as usual Gypsy.
👍 👍
Sing it, Uncle Pat!
Rutte F’d up and moved up.
Interesting Read….
The NATO 5%…..is to be achieved by 2035.
NATO – Topic: Funding NATO
Combine that with EU head Ursula Fond of Lying
trying to raise funds for a separate military…for EU.
And that most..NATO countries are EU countries 🤷♀️
🤔 🤔
It is called Readiness 2030.
European Union website…
White Paper for European Defence – Readiness 2030 | EEAS
Great idea! Let the EU build their own military. When it’s in place, Then dissolve NATO and bring ALL of our people home to defend our country. Europe can finally swim or sink on their own, rather than being propped up by US taxpayers.
Ron Paul is such a great man.
Goldwater,Buchanan, & Dr Paul would have made fine America First Presidents. Many of our problems would have never been if we had these patriots as Presidents. I thank God every day for PDJT.
Similarly, just as NATO expands towards Russia, Islam has expanded within NATO.
Funny how that all works.
So Airhead Maggie has laid out the globalists MSM talking point regardless of how out of touch with reality she is.
Maggot Brennan is only interested in Keeping Up Appearances for her position in Obama-ville.
what false flag will happen this week to attempt and derail this meeting? you know it is coming….
That has been the subject of much
discussion lately.
Hopefully, what nefarious incident they
may be planning this time is
discovered and diffused.
🙏 🙏
That relies on an NSA that hasn’t been captured for decades.
The last meeting between President Trump
and President Putin- Helsinki 2018 was
sabotaged by the Russia Hoax.
Will Zelensky and his handlers be doing a
….stupid stunt like Operation 🕸️ Spiderweb
or something like that.
Or a German Taurus ( but don’t call it Taurus🤣)
strike on Moscow right before…or during…the
meeting.
That is the primary topic being discussed .🤷♀️
Ukraine has already tried to kill Putin & Trump 2x, watch out for CIA to try for a 2 for 1.
The sickening thing about that summit was how the pressitutes were making the meeting all about themselves.
I’m guessing one of the first steps will be free and fair elections. That takes care of the Z problem. Maybe each region will decide its own allegiances.
UK still grooming V. Zaluzhnyi.🤷♀️
The latest…..
Valeriy Zaluzhnyi stars in Vogue Ukraine for the first time and writes a column
MSN
🤷♀️ 🤷♀️ Known Banderite🤷♀️🤷♀️
🥴 🥴 🤣 🤣 🥴 🥴
They sure know how to pick ‘em…./s
Ex-Amb. Ford: UK, US trained ex-ISIS al-Jolani for political integration. – YouTube
2months ago
YAYYY!!! It’s Sunday! The day Sundance nukes the leftist talking heads!
Yes, Sundance does have a way with words!!!
Sundance nukes the Leftwing/Globalist Narrative Bots (talking heads) 24/7/365
Ukraine has to be defeated and can surrender unconditionally.It’s now, or a bigger war much later. Ceasefires are always demanded by the losing side. Israel rolled over for ceasefires for 75 years . It is now ending Hamas and all those Hamas cult Arabs in Gaza will be relocated. The Russians have said Ukraine must be demilitarized and denazified. No EU population is interested in going to war. The political class can go to war. Russia is not interested in submitting to any bullying from the USA/NATO.
It looks to me like Germany could use a little denazification in its own right. I’ve dealt with a few of them and the powers that be are pretty scary in their outlook. Domineering, with no concern other than their money! No concern for the common people.
Praise GOD!!! Fight! Fight! Fight!
“Ukraine has to be defeated and can surrender unconditionally.”
To surrender unconditionally would leave every man, woman, child and unborn child in Ukraine at the not at all tender mercies of Vladimir Putin, especially as he calls them all Nazis. Frankly, wishing this upon them is about as un-Godly and un-Christian a thing as I have ever heard of.
(Now, let the Putin lovers and the Ukraine haters attacks commence!)
I’d enjoy hearing Miz Brennan interview Secretary William Seward about handling the Confederate states in 1865.
47Yinzer: I am reading the Personal Memoirs of Ulysses S. Grant right now. Miz Brennan features heavily in the critical battles of the war.
Trump should simply tell Rutte that for YEARS, the US paid well over their fair share and, in true Obama style, we should pull back and take the money normally given to NATO and put it into our National Treasury. NATO can do what they must in order to keep the slacker nations putting in their fair share and to let them all support the programs without the US for a few years. NATO, like the US and many other countries, needs to learn how to make a budget and live within their means.
Brilliant! 1 pie, 3 pigs. NATO, Zero or the CIA? Divide and conquer! President Trump gets it; it’s always about da $.
NATO needs ending
Let them find their own defenses. Crumble EU Crumble
The Sum of All [their] Fears. Dialogue between the Finalists. The same forces seeking to derail Reagan/Gorbochov are still at work today.
Rutte has no status in the US. He can go talk to Zelensky.
Y’all will have to let me know if another ‘do you hear yourself?’ moment happens. That…I’ll watch!
I no longer watch these interviews with Brennan and Welker. I refuse to give up moments of my day to them. I watch the ones with Maria Bartiroma, that that’s about it for Sunday shows.
can someone explain the significance of meeting in Alaska (USA)? I heard Putin suggested UAE or other middle-eastern state. Was there a risk there of him being taken?
SD alluded to how EU wants to arrest Putin for war crimes. Is SD just saying the USA location protects Putin from this? while being somewhat mid-way for both parties? Or, is there more to the Alaska location?
Easy to defend – lots of military and probably not many CIA.
Praise GOD!!! Fight! Fight! Fight!
I found this an interesting read, explained a lot.
https://archive.is/2025.08.10-072252/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/08/10/putin-trump-russia-ukraine-summit/
Brennan has to be a CIA asset…
Low level honey pot asset turning into vinegar publicly without even knowing it.
She is a card – carrying member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
“Fake the Nation w/ Maggot Brennan”
Sorry, no can do. I must keep Sunday dinner down.
One change: “Deface The Nation”. 😁
I don’t think Trump is going to bring a giant red button to the meeting with Putin. Trump would be more likely to put red button under Putin’s seat cushion. Still in my mind Zelenskyy is the one preventing a deal, because his puppet masters don’t want one.
MARGARET BRENNAN: … ‘The concern is, of course, as you know, among some critics, that in this conference room in Alaska, we’re going to see a 1938 moment. Where, in an attempt to immediately halt a war, the groundwork is laid for an even bigger conflict because of concessions that are made.”
Donald J Trump will not appease Vladimir Putin in 2025 …
SECRETARY GENERAL RUTTE: … how to deal with the factual situation that the Russians are holding, at this moment, Ukrainian territory.
Crucially important here is that when it comes to this holding of Ukrainian territory, that there might be a factual situation that they are doing this, but that we can never accept that in a legal sense, in,, as this is called, a de jure sense, as you know, the US hosted embassies with Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia between 1940 and 1991 acknowledging that the Soviet Union was controlling those territories, but never accepting, in a legal sense, in a de jure sense, that fact.
So all these issues will be on the table, hopefully, post-Friday, if Putin is serious, and Putin then has to commit to sit down with Zelensky. He cannot do this through President Trump.
In the end, it has to be, as President Trump has stated himself, a three-way conversation, at least, with the Europeans heavily involved.
The Europeans have been one of the big obstacles to finding a peace deal. We cannot ignore how certain oblasts in Southern Ukraine voted, how many view themselves as Russians and of course the war that was being fought before Russia went full in on engaging in the war.
Using the analogy of Neville Chamberlain to Donald Trump was certainly wrong and just plain ridiculous, but it happened to have been used as a universal talking point earlier in the year and even last year amongst the MSM!
Here’s one of the best examples from March of last year:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/11/donald-trump-is-the-very-opposite-of-neville-chamberlain-an-honest-politician
The TI Sensitive Intelligence that captured analysis of a Clinton Plan is widely believed to be Intel shared by Dutch AIVD.
Disclosure of this information is governed by cooperative agreements between governments.
Rutte was PM of the Netherlands when Dutch Intel hacked Russians hacking US networks.
Watching that syphilitic piece of garbage talk about how “Russia is the greatest threat to the Western Alliance” makes me wonder why there is still a NATO and why the U.S. is still part of that clown show. NATO was founded as a counterweight to the Soviet Union and its satellites in Eastern Europe, which formed the Warsaw Pact. NATO lost its reason for existence 35 years ago when the Soviet Union collapse and the Warsaw Pact dissolved.
Since then NATO, acting on behalf of Western banking and commercial interests, has been an outrageous provocateur of Christian Russia, pushing right up to the borders of Mother Russia. What would we think if we had dissolved NATO 35 years ago, and the Warsaw pact had pushed all the way into Mexico and had 13 biological weapons laboratories within 100 miles of the border with the U.S.? Wouldn’t we have launched an incursion into Mexico, a special military operation? You bet we would have, and it would be seen as not only necessary, but laudatory.
We, the United States, are 100% in the wrong in this situation, and it creeps me out to watch how Trump, who campaigned on ending this war–which he must have known could only be accomplished by cutting off all aid to Ukraine–has effectively repudiated what he ran on, has aligned himself with vermin like Lindsay Graham, has re-opened the floodgates of aid to Ukraine, and is committed to salvaging the CIA’s unjust war on Russia, using the Ukrainians as cannon fodder. This is by far the most devastating disappointment of Trump’s second term. MAGA means ended NATO immediately!
I guess this is what makes the world go around.
Some of us want to put President Trump on Mt. Rushmore, while others sound like hey want to impeach and convict him.
Always felt the Pres. Trump and Putin had a mutual respect and shared knowledge of Deep State operations, and believe that Pres. Putin provided Pres. Trump the ability to address the internal Intel State Treason. So, I will be flying both the U.S. and Russian flags thru this summit period. Thank you Pres’ Putin & Trump!
Ukraine is the puppet of the US and has been so since 2014. Ukraine should have no say. Zelensky specifically should have no say. When there is a cease fire, they have to hold elections. If they are not corrupt, Zelensky will lose.
I wish we would get out of NATO.
Here’s what I wonder and Trump and his staff should be game-planning for. If Trump and Putin come to a cease-fire, what will the CIA/ Z man do to undercut this? Z Man likes the war– he stays in power and gets paid richly. The UK and EU seem to want a continued war– I guess the leaders are making money off the war. And the CIA/ Military-Industrial complex wants a forever war. All the elites make lots of money. So if Trump negotiates a cease-fire, does Z-Man break the truce and rains down missiles (with the CIA help) on Russia? How does Trump stop this?
Russia said they won’t accept a ceasefire.
At some point the US has to stop letting Ukraine call the shots as far as US involvement. Rubio said this is a US proxy war and so it is the US’ prerogative to continue supporting the proxy or not…it’s not the proxy’s decision. Likewise if this is not a US proxy war and the US has been acting based on completely altruistic motives [which nobody believes] there’s nothing obligating the US to continue supporting Ukraine indefinitely. So make the deal, stop military assistance, and taper the funding propping up the Zelensky government and if the EU wants to take the reins let them…making it clear the US is no longer a participant. What’s the alternative…allow Zelensky and the EU to dictate what the US can do?
How long will WeThePeople support FUKraine grifting oligarchs?
PotusTrump promised to end the war…I’m holding him to it.
“The ever-dramatic Margaret Brennan is in full pearl-clutching mode as she questions NATO Secretary General, Mark Rutte, about the upcoming meeting between horrible President Trump and even more horrible President Putin.“
I must say, in all fairness, this is actually pretty darn good for Margaret Brennan, getting one out of two right. That’s much better than she usually does
Actually it’s not “Mrs. Brennan”, it’s Mrs. Yado Yakub.
Margaret Brennan’s snarky, condescending, know-it-all attitude comes from an overall feeling of self-importance. After all, she is a board member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
Sundance says it’s always about the $$$.
So who kicks in some extra $$$ for Brennan’s performances?
Or, instead of being a presstitute, does she do it for free because she is our virtue signaling better?
It would be too bad if Russiagate investigations revealed the truth.
Rutte is defending his DADDY… Margaret doesn;t like that..
“NATO Secretary Rutte is quite happy with the new funds flowing into the NATO alliance as organized by President Trump. “
Clearly, President Trump wants a far stronger NATO or else he would not have pushed so hard for the European NATO nations to increase (or at least make that promise) their defense spending from only 2% of GDP to 5% of GDP. I really doubt that even President Trump could have done that much (maybe 3%?) if it were not for Putin’s over 3 years long “Specials Military Operation”.
You may or may not have remembered during the Fake pandemic, installed globalist influencers like Rutte would appear on Fake news and justify forced vaccination over a Fake pandemic. Here we are again pretending not to notice the War on Covid is now just another globalist inspired manufactured hoax called the War in Ukraine. But this time they convinced you (once again) they would never lie to you and are telling the truth because faking a foreign war is much harder to do then faking a global pandemic in your own backyard?
better put the popcorn down and wake up people.
Just a note of thanks SD, for indulging with transcripts. There are many times I will just not listen to that insufferable shrew. Reading becomes the pleasure. Call it self-care
NATO expansion is and has been all about $billions in arms sales. Nothing more, nothing less.
All those former Soviet republics were/are armed with Soviet weapons. From small arms to big, from tanks to fighter jets, all Soviet made.
Get a former Soviet republic to join NATO, have them re-arm with NATO weapons (a condition of joining NATO is compatibility and interoperability), make $billions for the military industrial complex (with a nice cut for the low life Eurotrash and DC trash like Ms Lindsay).
Simple and basic as that.
–“NATO expansion”–
Yes indeedy, isn’t it also interesting that 1/2 (16 of 32) of the NATO nations joined NATO from 1999(8 years after the dissolution of the USSR ‘boogeyman’) through 2024.
This man. Mark Rutte. This man did so much harm to the Netherlands. If i ever take power? Mark Rutte will be on trial for numerous crimes.
Rutte is kissing American ass only for his current job. He can never be trusted.
Russia (Poetin)the greatest threat? Islam is our greatest threat…
MAGA. Pass the Cheetos and Winnamins!
👊👊🇺🇸🇺🇸❤️❤️🙏🏻🙏🏻🍿🍿🍿🍿
It could be me who is missing something, but this seemed to be a very low IQ discussion going on. It seemed like two people reassuring themselves and each other that Ukraine and NATO haven’t lost anything as a result of this completely unnecessary war that has killed over a million young men in their prime reproductive years.
War today is caused by globalists and central bankers for purposes of controlling all the earth’s resources and depopulating the earth of human beings. Everything else is nonsense.
Putin isn’t Stalin or Pol Pot. There are, however, globalist predators who benefit no matter who wins. The loss of a million human beings means nothing to psychopaths.
I believe Trump has a plan to end their stranglehold on the world economy, and their capacity to start and wage needless wars.
I would not be surprised if Putin, too, were sick and tired of the globalists of the world and all the havoc they have caused. I hope Putin and Trump are able to make some kind of arrangement that leads to peace.
x
x