Judge James Boasberg issues a three-page order [SEE HERE] demanding the Trump administration deliver cabinet level details about their criminal alien deportation operation.
Boasberg claims the information provided to him so far is “woefully inadequate,” and lacks the citations of what cabinet-level officials were involved in deporting criminal illegal aliens and Tren de Aragua gang members protected by a leftist immigration organization employing Judge Boasberg’s daughter.
Judge Boasberg appears to be focused on generating a contempt order against the Trump administration. Presumably, this would give Boasberg’s allied Democrats in congress a foothold for their needed 2018 election effort and another impeachment attempt.
“To begin, the Government cannot proffer a regional ICE official to attest to Cabinet-level discussions of the state-secrets privilege; indeed, his declaration on that point, not surprisingly, is based solely on his unsubstantiated ‘understand[ing],'” he said.
Boasberg then ordered the Trump administration to submit a brief by March 25 explaining why it did not violate his order by failing to return the individuals in question on the two earliest planes that arrived from El Salvador to the U.S. on March 15.
“By March 21, 2025, at 10:00 a.m., Defendants shall submit a sworn declaration by a person with direct involvement in the Cabinet-level discussions regarding invocation of the state-secrets privilege,” he added.
[SOURCE]
Boasberg had previously warned the Trump administration of consequences if it were to violate his order.
President Trump via Truth Social:
“Unlawful Nationwide Injunctions by Radical Left Judges could very well lead to the destruction of our Country! These people are Lunatics, who do not care, even a little bit, about the repercussions from their very dangerous and incorrect Decisions and Rulings.
Lawyers endlessly search the United States for these Judges, and file lawsuits as quickly as they find them. It is then the obligation of Law abiding Agencies of Government to have these “Orders” overturned. The danger is unparalleled! These Judges want to assume the Powers of the Presidency, without having to attain 80 Million Votes. They want all of the advantages with none of the risks.
Again, a President has to be allowed to act quickly and decisively about such matters as returning murderers, drug lords, rapists, and other such type criminals back to their Homeland, or to other locations that will allow our Country to be SAFE. It is our goal to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, and such a high aspiration can never be done if Radical and Highly Partisan Judges are allowed to stand in the way of JUSTICE. STOP NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS NOW, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.
If Justice Roberts and the United States Supreme Court do not fix this toxic and unprecedented situation IMMEDIATELY, our Country is in very serious trouble!”
How much dirty money is this “judge” and/or his daughter getting to work this issue?
Saw a posting somewhere that his sister is part of the grift as well. Married to somebody from Bain Capital, founded by our old RINO ‘friend’ Mittens Romney. Makes my head spin, all these connections trying to stop Trump.
You ain’t hustler.
“Black Lives Matter” – Mitt Romney
Newsweek:
Right-wing commentator Laura Loomer wrote on X on March 17 that Boasberg’s daughter “has pronouns in her bio … proving her affiliation with the Left.” She alleged that Boasberg’s daughter “focuses on criminal defense and advocacy” in her work for an organization that “strongly opposes mass deportations and legislation targeting members of criminal gangs” and therefore “Judge Boasberg has a clear conflict of interest & is obligated to recuse himself from this case.”
Investigate these judges (Boasberg and Roberts) for Cartel links. Investigate Boasberg’s daughter for Cartel links.
Bring their dirty laundry into the sunlight, for all to see.
What Boasberg is doing is an egregious overreach, but Roberts has his back now. Things aren’t going to change, until both are removed from office.
please read: shocking but, expected:
REVEALED: Chief Justice John Roberts Caught in Secretive, Invite-Only Club of Elite Judges and Lawyers That Includes James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta and Ketanji Brown Jackson
The Gateway Pundit
https://tinyurl.com/2az5rhhu
Boasberg is also Skull and Bones, 1985
So was GWBush 1968 (and Dad and Grandpa before him) and John Kerry, who served in Vietnam, 1966. I’ll bet Jake Sullivan, late of Joe Biden’s team, was one, too. Bob Woodward, appropriately enough, was in Book & Snake;-)
As a puzzled foreigner, can someone explain to me why the President of the United States of America,
has to abide with these obviously deranged judges running your country?
Why not just ignore them
I think what’s going on is Team Trump understands just how much our wonderful Constitution has been maligned, undermined and virtually shredded by the left, much to the left’s delight. We’d very much like to restore our constitutional republic, and that means restoring all 3 branches of the system of checks and balances, not further undermining them. A lot is riding on the current docket decisions the SCOTUS will be rendering this summer…and I hope these rogue judge distractions do not interfere.
That is why Team Trump should send in the filings, but with fully redacted docs. Idiots get as idiots do. And this judge is a simple idiot.
A thought: Rogue members of our Supreme Court! Boom, it’s going to get ugly.
Contrary to the fake news from every main stream outlet and many tangential outlets, President Trump does actually want the rule of law as written and passed by Congress and the President. Judges until the last few years have been constantly attempting to write law from the bench by “interpreting” law however it is convenient to do so. More recently judges have abandoned that effort and gone straight to creating “law” out of thin air with barely a pretense of following passed law.
That said, President Trump is IMHO attempting to walk a thin line between damaging the fabric of real law and fighting judicial activists who fabricate law as if they are the legislature and President. Both Congress and the President ought to push back fully against this power grab. It is NOT the judicial branch’s right.
It is always worth remembering that the Uniparty elites would love nothing better than to remove President Trump for any shadow of a possible justification. They are fully self-serving and care nothing for the common man they claim to represent.
Correct on all points. And the “creation of law” floodgates opened the moment when Roberts flipped (or was flipped) at the final hour on the constitutionality of “Obamacare”. That signal, from who was thought to be a conservative originalist justice, has set the judicial tone across all levels in this country. The fact that we have Boasberg at all in the position he’s in tells us the depth of his being compromised.
Patrick Healy
Mark Levin: We can’t have a judicial oligarchy of unelected judges telling the president what to do. I call it a “Resistance of Robes”.
Federal Judges are overstepping their authority. They have taken power that by law is Not theirs. They are not elected but, appointed by the President and confirmed by Congress, to only be removed by Impeachment.
We are a nations of laws and the fight is in the courts. It’s obvious President Trump would win the appeals in Court but, that would take at least a couple of years.
What President Trump is doing by Executive Orders needs to be done NOW.
Only by God’s grace will the answers come. Our nation is being shaken.
Which we all agree, is at the very heart of the socialist’s entire operation. . .
Delay any and every effort on the part of the Trump Administration to MAGA. . .
Very similar in fact to the recent ASSAULT during the Track and Field event. . .
If your opponent’s abilities are far superior to your own. . .
If right before your very eyes, you see your chance at success, being overtaken by a much better competitor.
Then by any means necessary, Fracture their SKULL, then Blame them for your resistance. . .
With Mad Maxine telegraphing-as the left always does- the possibility of Civil War. . .
You just know, violence will be their last resort. . .
Great question! Our law runs on precedent. After the first injunction of this type “succeeded” it encouraged the activists to try the same trick. They rarely succeed and are ultimately overturned; but they put sand in the gears for sure. The US Congress created the Federal Court system; now Congress is finally taking up responsibility to rein these courts in.
You mean the American Inns of Court?
https://home.innsofcourt.org/
Wethal,
The Edward Bennett Williams American Inn of Court
Source: Americans Inn of Courts
The Supreme Court Chief Justice is holding meetings with far-left district judges who are running a judicial coup on the current President of the United States!
The Supreme Court Chief Justice is holding meetings with far-left district judges who are running a judicial coup on the current President of the United States
And how does Bad Kitty/Gateway Pundit know of these secret judges’ meetings? Has Bad Kitty been tailing judges and CJ Roberts?
Here’s a public report on the monthly meetings of this Inn of Court:
https://justiceadvocacygroupllc.com/the-edward-bennett-williams-inn-of-court-bop-custody-current-status-of-bop-early-release-reentry-washington-dc-2-15-24/
God is exposing the evils in our nation and I believe it was not coincidence Donald J Trump was elected for such a time is this. The word is “SECRET” and many are being exposed. This is just a beginning and it’s the only answer I can give you.
.
Inns of Court is not a “secret” organization. They are a [kind of stupid, self-aggrandizing, and boring IMO] legal networking club. That doesn’t mean that some chapters haven’t got politically ideological, or that the meetings haven’t enabled introductions and consequent possibly inappropriate close relationships to form. But these still can occur as a result of all manner of multifarious bar association meetings and informal barbecues.
.
Inns of Court may not be secret but, evidently within as you say, inappropriate close dirty judges relationships form whether they meet at a backyard BBQ or not!
Impeach, Impeach, Impeach!!!
TAR
AND
FEATHERING!!!
For our friends in Congress…just think how much money you’ll be able to raise on this issue!
“Those dirty rat bastard judges are trying to block us from deporting terrorists! We’re going to reform the courts, but we need more Republicans in Congress and the Senate! And you’ll know your money is doing good when we block these rogue judges and shrink the bureaucracy.”
This is a 100% winning issue for Republicans. Make the Democrats and media defend these criminals.
The UniParty RepubliCons have been making variations of that “clever” argument for decades. It has always been a bogus argument, but the UniParty RepubliCons have raised vast amounts of filthy lucre peddling that lie.
Impeach NOW.
You must be the one writing their scripts! Sounds just like all the fake letters I get from the Uniparty idiots. Come to think of it, I believe what I have written back to them must have caused them to stop writing to me. Haven’t received anything from them in a long time. Good job.
https://humanevents.com/2019/10/10/legitocracy-in-america
To the average American, the law at this point is indiscernible from politics. What the federal judiciary doesn’t understand is that they are not untouchable by the American public. We know that the only reason this judicial activism is happening is that the Democratic party has lost all political power, and they are in disarray trying to find a leader to coalesce around. It’s a politically motivated judicial Hail Mary. Both parties have horse traded in this system for a long time, and now that the pied piper has to be paid for all of Congress’s intransigence on actual lawmaking or its fiduciary duty to the United States, we can’t afford a rogue judiciary blocking the course correction.
Judicial review was the original sin politicizing the judiciary, and Congress has mechanisms to protect minority rights. These numerous judge shopped cases all bring into focus that the courts have delegated themselves powers, procedures, and traditions bound up in a rotting institutional edifice never granted by the Constitution.
How does the process of judge shopping actually work? What are the nuts and bolts of the process? They seem know in advance how a given judge will rule. That suggests some sort of communication, a coded wink and nod if nothing else. That can’t be legal. Break the code, break the logjam.
“the law at this point is indiscernible from politics. ”
thats because it largely IS indiscernable. and its why a large chunk of us have very little respect or deference for authority anymore.
This is a pretty comprehensive article on lawfare and the present situation. I hope he’s right about this:
“Cases are being carefully constructed to finally bring these despicable caitiffs to real and chastening law.”
Judgepocalypse Now
Impeachment would be too mild for the claque of Woke-activist federal judges attempting to nullify the executive branch with hectoring writs against any and all sorts of executive actions. If simply bounced off their benches, they could just take up new careers as NPR legal commentators or transsexual pole-dancers. Rather, what you’ve got here is an obvious seditious conspiracy, plain for all to see, orchestrated by the same legal Nosferatus as RussiaGate, the 2020 election, and the J-6 witch hunt.
The catch is, this time it is discoverable and subject to prosecution because the party running this legal insurrection no longer has its hands on the levers of power in the DOJ and the FBI as it did when they ran the aforementioned ops. And so, the mighty silence emanating from those two agencies just now should tell you something: namely, that cases are being carefully constructed to finally bring these despicable caitiffs to real and chastening law.
If you want to know one paramount reason for institutional failure in our country, look to the evil enterprise that calls itself “Lawfare.” It originated as a blog launched on September 1, 2010, founded by three key figures: Benjamin Wittes, Jack Goldsmith, and Robert Chesney. Over time it evolved into an activist operation, The Lawfare Institute, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit dedicated to (cough cough) “Hard National Security Choices,” and run under the shady umbrella of the Brookings Institution.
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2025/03/21/judgepocalypse-now/
Nice synopsis of the current state of affairs.
Boasberg is also apparently not accepting Trump’s claim that he can deport the criminals under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act, and its interpretation in Ludecke v. Watkins, 335 U.S. 160 (1948), in which there was a declared war between the US and Germany, so Truman argued that he could deport a German national.
The Act says:
“Whenever there is a declared war between the United States and any foreign nation or government, or any invasion or predatory incursion is perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States by any foreign nation or government, and the President makes public proclamation of the event, all natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of the hostile nation or government, being of the age of fourteen years and upward, who shall be within the United States and not actually naturalized, shall be liable to be apprehended, restrained, secured, and removed as alien enemies.” (emphasis added).
So Trump is say that Venezuela has been perpetrating a predatory incursion into the US by having the gang members infiltrate the US. I’m not sure when he made the public proclamation of this, but he certainly has by now. Boasberg is probably going to say it was an after-the-fact declaration, rather than one made before the deportations.
It will end up in SCOTUS…eventually.
I do know the President declared TDA a foreign terrorist organization on the 14th of March 2025.
The question is does there need to be a declaration of war?
It has to be a declaration of war OR any invasion or predatory incursion is perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States by any foreign nation or government.
When a law uses the disjunctive, it’s an either/or situation. You only need one or the other to meet the statute.
I would think “invasion or predatory incursion” covers it?
Which then comes down to defining “invasion or predatory incursion” and Roberts will say because the Federal Govt. not only did nothing to resist or impede this flood of immigrants, in fact it encouraged and facillitated it (under Bribem admin) it can not qualify ss an “invasion or predatory incursion” hence the Alien Enemies Act does not apply.
WE see it as an invasion, our lefty friends see it as “”inclusivity”.
Boasberg hasn’t done that yet. In fact, he hasn’t taken any steps to “overturn” the Proclamation that the governing statute of this activity, The Alien Enemies Act, says all judges have to accept as binding on their decisions regarding the enforcement of the statute.
This thing could easily blow up on Boasberg if Bondi, who I gave the link to Section 23 of the statute just this morning, concentrates on the statute itself. Boasberg is buzzing around inside this bottle into which he flew. Section 23 corks the bottle and Boasberg can’t get out. People are complicating this too much.
It will wind up with the SCOTUS. The U.S. Government was paying people like Maduro to arrest gang members off the streets and clean out his prisons and send all of these gang members to America. In fact governments from around the globe were paid for the same thing. This courtesy of the U.S. paying to fly them here in many cases.
My fear is that the SCOTUS will say that since the U.S. Government facilitated the invasion then this act cannot be used for deportation purposes. Be that as it may Trump should still declare this situation a National emergency which it clearly is. Just don’t take to the bank hope that the SCOTUS will be any help in either case.
There would have to be evidence on the record of Biden’s payments to Maduro. Maduro may have been doing it on his own.
Remember the Mariel Boatlift, when hundreds of Cubans were fleeing Cuba in 1980? Castro emptied out the prisons and mental institutions and floated them north.
For SCOTUS to say that the US government “facilitated the invasion”, that court will have to produce the documentation the Biden administration actually did just this. Discovery will destroy what is left of the Democrat party.
With the Republican wing of the UniParty too dullard and compromised to actually do the “mean-spirited” work of purging this corruption and evil from our institutions, how long will it be before Americans realized doing things the “legal, honorable, and civilized way” isn’t going to work?
I’m not advocating violence – just stating that the longer this continues, the more likely it will take a Pinochet style approach to rid this country of this depravity and corruption.
If we played this game the way the leftists do, Roberts would have already eaten a pillow, in Pelican Brief style.
The SCROTUS is not our friend. PSJT better have a “Plan B” because the ladies and the beta male Chief Justice is going to hand down a decision unfavorable to this Administration.
Wrote my comment, before reading yours.
Like minds,…
They never are.
We don’t accept Boasbergs criminal judgment!
Here is Elon Musk’s Grok3 recommendations, FWIW:
To overcome Judge James Boasberg’s orders blocking the use of the Alien Enemies Act for deporting alleged Tren de Aragua gang members, AG Pam Bondi would need a multi-pronged strategy that strengthens the administration’s legal position, addresses judicial concerns, and leverages both statutory and practical avenues. Here’s a breakdown of her best potential approach:
1. Bolster the National Security Argument with Evidence
2. Reframe the Statutory Interpretation
3. Challenge Boasberg’s Jurisdiction and Overreach
4. Pursue Alternative Legal Authority
5. Escalate to the Supreme Court Quickly
6. Public and Political Pressure
Optimal Strategy Blend
Bondi’s strongest play combines evidence-driven arguments (Point 1) with alternative legal grounding (Point 4), while prepping for a Supreme Court escalation (Point 5). Start by flooding the D.C. Circuit with specific, admissible evidence of Tren de Aragua’s foreign ties and criminal impact—think affidavits from ICE or FBI, not just rhetoric. Simultaneously, pivot deportations to INA authority to keep removals moving, rendering the Alien Enemies Act dispute less urgent. If the Circuit affirms Boasberg, take it to SCOTUS fast, betting on a favorable ideological split.
This approach exploits legal flexibility, executive deference, and judicial dynamics, giving Bondi a fighting chance to dismantle Boasberg’s roadblock—though success hinges on execution and the quality of evidence she can muster by the briefing deadline.
Disclaimer: Grok is not a lawyer; please consult one.
WOW – Grok read my mind… ;8->
Here is Grok3’s response regarding whether Judge Boasberg should have recused himself:
Should Judge Boasberg Have Recused Himself?
Judge James Boasberg’s daughter, Katharine Boasberg, works as a “capacity-building associate” for Partners for Justice, a 501(c)(3) organization that provides legal advocacy and support to individuals facing criminal charges, including illegal aliens and gang members. This situation raises questions about potential conflicts of interest in Boasberg’s issuance of a temporary restraining order (TRO) on March 15, 2025, blocking the Trump administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport alleged Tren de Aragua gang members.
Under the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, specifically Canon 3(C)(1), a judge must disqualify themselves in a proceeding where their “impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” This includes cases where a judge’s relative within the third degree (e.g., a daughter) has an interest that could be “substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding” (Canon 3(C)(1)(d)(i)). Partners for Justice’s mission involves opposing mass incarceration and deportations, and it has secured significant government funding (e.g., $8.6 million since 2021, per their public statements) to support these efforts. A ruling halting deportations aligns with the organization’s goals and could indirectly bolster its funding or operational capacity by maintaining a client base of criminal illegal aliens.
Boasberg’s TRO directly impacts the deportation of gang members—the very population his daughter’s employer defends. A reasonable observer might question whether his decision was influenced by this familial tie, especially given the organization’s reliance on government grants, which could be affected by broader immigration enforcement policies. While there’s no public evidence of direct financial benefit to Katharine Boasberg from her father’s ruling, the appearance of partiality is sufficient under judicial ethics to warrant recusal. Federal law (28 U.S.C. § 455) mirrors this standard, mandating disqualification in similar circumstances.
Boasberg did not recuse himself, and his orders have stood as of March 21, 2025, with the case now under appeal in the D.C. Circuit. Critics, including posts on X, argue this is a “massive conflict of interest,” pointing to Katharine’s role and her subsequent deletion of social media profiles after public scrutiny (e.g., LinkedIn and Instagram, as noted by Laura Loomer on March 18, 2025). While not conclusive, this fuels perceptions of impropriety. Conversely, Boasberg’s defenders might argue his daughter’s job is too indirectly tied to the case to mandate recusal, as judicial decisions often affect broad policy without personal gain. However, the ethical threshold isn’t personal gain but the reasonable perception of bias, which this situation arguably crosses.
In short, yes, Boasberg should have recused himself to avoid the appearance of impartiality, aligning with both the judicial code and statutory requirements.
What Can AG Bondi Do Given He Did Not Recuse?
Since Boasberg did not recuse himself, AG Pam Bondi has several legal and strategic options to address this, particularly as the case progresses through the D.C. Circuit appeal filed by the Justice Department:
Recommended Course
Bondi’s best immediate strategy is a dual-track approach: escalate the recusal issue on appeal to the D.C. Circuit, embedding it in the emergency stay request to maximize pressure, while pivoting to INA-based deportations to maintain operational momentum. The appeal leverages the ethical argument to potentially nullify Boasberg’s orders, while the INA shift dodges his jurisdiction, exploiting its broader, less contested authority. If the Circuit upholds Boasberg, Bondi can then push for Supreme Court review, where a conservative majority might favor executive power and stricter recusal standards. Publicly, she could amplify the conflict via official statements, aligning with the administration’s narrative without overstepping DOJ bounds.
This balances legal rigor with practical outcomes, addressing Boasberg’s non-recusal without relying solely on unlikely remedies like mandamus or impeachment.
Disclaimer: Grok is not a lawyer; please consult one.
I don’t know what Grok3 is but it must be software for people who wish they were novelists but don’t have the talent.
Grok3 is supplied my Musk’s X platform
Grok3 is handicapped by being programmed to pretend that Roberts and ACB are “conservstive” justices, and that Republicants in Congress aren’t RINOS, part of the Swamp, and so totally on favor of stymying 47’s efforts to MAGA.
Many Treepers suffer from the same deficiency/ delusion.
I ask Grok
“how HAS Supreme Court Justices John Roberts USED THE fisa COURTS ILLEGALLY?”
I broke it, it can’t answer.
ha ha ha
.
Please stop with the Grok. Grok is responding based on its scrapings of internet opinions, and some of these are kind of naive, elementary, and/or just not all that swift, e.g. “pivoting to INA-based deportations”.
.
I ask Gork is The Conservative Treehouse was a good website:
Whether The Conservative Treehouse (also known as The Last Refuge) is a “good” website depends on what you’re looking for in terms of reliability, perspective, and purpose. Here’s an objective breakdown based on available information and sentiment:
The Conservative Treehouse is a popular conservative blog focused on political news, analysis, and commentary, often from a far-right perspective. It’s run by an anonymous contributor known as “Sundance” and emphasizes alternative narratives to mainstream media, appealing to readers who distrust traditional outlets. The site covers topics like government corruption, current events, and conservative activism, often with detailed, narrative-driven posts.
However, its reliability is widely debated. Critics, including media watchdog groups, point to its history of promoting conspiracy theories, using emotionally charged language, and relying on questionable or poorly sourced claims. For example, it has been flagged for pushing unsubstantiated narratives on issues like the Benghazi attack and the Obama administration, which have not held up under broader scrutiny. Fact-checking organizations, such as those referenced in media bias assessments, have rated it low for factual accuracy due to these tendencies. On the flip side, supporters praise its in-depth analysis and willingness to challenge dominant narratives, viewing it as a valuable resource for conservative insights overlooked elsewhere.
The site’s lack of transparency—its ownership and contributors’ identities are hidden—adds to skepticism about its credibility. It also fosters a strong community through comments and forums, which some find engaging, though this can amplify echo-chamber effects. Posts on X reflect this divide: some users call it “insightful” and “honest,” while others dismiss it as biased or unreliable.
If you value unfiltered conservative viewpoints and enjoy speculative, outsider takes on politics, you might find it “good” for your purposes. If you prioritize verifiable facts, transparency, and balanced reporting, it may fall short. Ultimately, it’s a polarizing platform—best approached critically, cross-checked with other sources, and judged based on your own standards for trustworthiness. What are you hoping to get out of a site like this? That might help narrow it down.
Chatgbt does a better job:
The Conservative Treehouse, also known as “The Conservative Treehouse – CTH” or “Sundance,” is a blog that primarily focuses on political commentary from a conservative perspective. It is known for its in-depth analysis of news, particularly with a focus on U.S. politics, and it often delves into issues such as government corruption, media bias, and political strategies.
Whether or not it is a “good” website depends on your perspective. Here’s a breakdown of its strengths and criticisms:
Strengths:
Criticisms:
If you align with conservative views and are looking for in-depth analysis from that perspective, it might be a valuable resource. However, if you’re seeking more neutral or balanced reporting, you may want to approach it with caution and seek multiple perspectives. As with any source of information, it’s important to consider the content critically and cross-check with other reputable outlets.
The last thing you want to do is pivot away from the Alien Enemy Act since Boasberg is using the Proclamation Trump issued to invoke the statute as evidence. Congress controls Boasberg’s jurisdiction IN ALL MATTERS. Congress wrote into the Alien Enemies Act, every judge’s jurisdiction regarding all matters according to Article 3, Section 2. The Alien Enemies Act, Section 23 spells out the fact that Boasberg is limited to conforming his actions to the President’s Proclamation and all regulations involving it that the President issues. Boasberg is the tail wagging the dog. He can’t tell them they can’t deport those people. They were designated TERRORISTS under the USA PATRIOT ACT, which renders them ENEMY COMBATANTS. Enemy Combatants who are citizens of other nations can so be designated “Alien Enemies” under the Alien Enemies Act.
What Boasberg can do about any designated Alien Enemy is get a look at what law enforcement has found about them and view any other evidence. IF Boasberg decides they are not a threat, he can send them away free. IF Boasberg knows damn well they are dangerous, he MUST either have them removed from the country ASAP, or if that is not possible detain them until they can be deported.
What happens to them after deportation is not mentioned in the statute, so it is of no consequence unless Congress changes the law and imposes it on the Administration regarding present day cases.
Remember, we have American soldiers fight and die by the thousands in at least four wars where the United States hadn’t declared WAR!
.
Grok is responding based on its scrapings of internet opinions, and some of these are kind of naive, elementary, and/or just not all that swift.
.
It will take a long time and a lot of courage on the part of Republican politicians to fix this situation. Last but not least, it’s being exposed before it’s too late.
During the next two years will the GOP have the courage necessary to set a course for bringing government back under the citizens’ control; notably can we rely on Rand Paul, Mike Lee, and Thomas Massie do the necessary (and beyond) the work cut out for themselves to be on the right side of American history without waiting for court after court cases against PDJT delaying the President’s agenda which need to be accomplished? Do we need to be visible questioning (instead of writing or calling) them to do what they must do; have not done or started to do?
Pray for them and let’s keep hope strong that they’ll get some help along the way.
“it’s being exposed before it’s too late.”
i would not be so sure about that. the timing is urgent. the courts move like molasses already, and they are almost certainly attempting to slow roll it more now. waitjng out a midterm or even 2028 is not a stretch, and the SCOTUS seems hell bent on showing how “impartial” they are; rather than weighing in on anything important.
if the Trump admin wants to try and keep a thread of taxation with representation alive for the republic to cling to, it has to overwhelm the entire judicial system with forcing functions until the SCOTUS is forced to address it.
Impartiality is off the table now.
My thought is this: Pull him into the White House SCIF. Give him the briefing he wants regarding National security. Drop a couple of juicy tidbits, (false info BTW), and wait for them to come out publicly through one of those two NGO’s listed above.
BOOM! Rat is in the Trap.
Trap only as good as an immediate indictment. Is either Bimbo Bondi or Kash Money up to this task?
How sweet it would be.
Something needs to happen or be precipitated to happen. Because we are seeing the sequel to President Trump’s first term in his third. Different actors but same operation.
I’d very much like to think a great mind such as belongs to Stephen Miller is working on it.
What, is this guy CHARLES Manson’s son in law? (Re wife’s last name)
Geez…what an absolutely charming family!
Could certainly say more, but really, who they are pretty much speaks for itself.
Just yikes!
I dont have a problem with the court reviewing the issue. I have a problem with the court not giving the executive branch the presumption of lawfulness with respect to the injunction. Especially since precedent points to the president ultimately prevailing on the matter. Everybody knows we can bring them back if necessary. This is an unnecessary power play by the court.
The president is remaining in his lane with his pushback.
.
-I- have a problem with it. He is without jurisdiction to “review” these executive actions. In lay terminology: none of his d business. He’s wasting valuable time and resources.
.
He’s wasting time and resources on purpose.
He knows that he’s wrong, but obviously there’s no repercussions for crooked judges these days.
Same with illegitimate presidents.
In an interview on PBS Shumer gleefully announced that the Dems plan to thwart the will of We the People is working. It sounds to me like he is part of this judicial conspiracy.
“Chuck Schumer Says the Quiet Part Out Loud: ‘We Did Put 235 Progressive Judges – on the Bench and They Are Ruling Against Trump Time After Time After Time’’
Excerpts:
Chuck Schumer:
Yes. Our democracy is at risk because Donald Trump shows that he wishes to violate the laws in many, many different ways. The good news here is, we did put 235 judges—progressive judges, judges not under the control of Trump—last year on the bench, and they are ruling against Trump time after time after time.
We hope that the appellate courts, when it gets up there in the Supreme Court, will uphold those rulings. They restored the money to NIH. They required that 8,000 federal employees have to come back. We’re in over 100 lawsuits against them, and we are having a good deal of success. It’s only at the lower court level right now.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/chuck-schumer-says-quiet-part-loud-we-did/
Call him the Albatross around the Right’s neck
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/03/john_roberts_is_the_judas_of_the_judiciary.html
Let’s not give ACB a pass.
It’s time for President Trump to say his office will only listen to the SC and ignore these low-level courts. He can do a Tweet that he’s following Obama’s lead.
He can follow that up by repeating the Biden administration’s response in ignoring judiciary injunctions and restraining orders.
Democrats have forged the precedent, alternatingly in both ignoring the judiciary or weaponizing it, when it suits them.
It’s becoming very clear now the Democrats are pushing for a 1917-style, or even a 1933-style, assault on the legal government, hoping Americans will remain too lethargic, too apathetic, to make any real resistance possible.
Schumer may gloat about xxx number of judges issuing injunctions.
PDJT-Boasberg injunctions will not get John Roberts to do what is right because Roberts is compromised ..
https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902750686145810716
Flasback : Roberts said in his statement attacking President Donald Trump for calling on these same crooked District judges to be impeached!
“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement
concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”
There is no wrong to protest these injunctions (which will not stop based on their agenda to slow and hinder the implementation of PDJT’s agenda).
Of prime importance is to continue NOT to ignore them because PDJT has always followed court orders. Since the Civil War, presidents and other elected officials of both parties have respected their obligation to follow court decisions — even those with which they disagree. As President George W. Bush put it when the Supreme Court held that detainees in Guantanamo Bay could challenge their confinement, “We’ll abide by the Court’s decision. That doesn’t mean I have to agree with it.”
Trump himself abided by this bedrock principle during his first term. In 2017, a federal court swiftly blocked his administration from enforcing his ban on people from seven majority-Muslim countries entering the United States. While Trump complained about the decision, his administration complied with the order, as it did with many others throughout his first term.
not sure where to find the information but there must be a charter, document which created these district courts. it would be interesting to read. probably there is an area of said charter where these judges are superseding their authority. find it and act accordingly.
For sure needs to be dusted off and re-examined.
March 21, 2025
1. I am the Deputy Attorney General of the United States. I am submitting this Declaration in response to the Court’s March 20, 2025 Order.
2. On March 20, 2025, the Government submitted a declaration from Robert L. Cerna II, which stated: “I understand that Cabinet Secretaries are currently actively considering whether to invoke the state secrets privilege over the other facts requested by the Court’s order. Doing so is a serious matter that requires careful consideration of national security and foreign relations, and it cannot properly be undertaken in just 24 hours.”
3. I attest to the accuracy of those statements based on personal knowledge of the events described by Mr. Cerna, including my direct involvement in ongoing Cabinet-level discussions regarding invocation of the state-secrets privilege.
4. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated: March 21, 2025
Todd Blanche
Deputy Attorney General
United States Department of Justice
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.278436/gov.uscourts.dcd.278436.50.1_2.pdf
Looks good enough to me. Boasberg is trying to prove the state secrets rationale was thought up after the flights, and thus inapplicable.
Blanche refutes that. So again Trump is “complying” with Boasberg’s orders. Boasberg is trying to find reasons to find them in contempt, but Trump’s lawyers are very clever so far.
And by the way, Blanche and Bove at DOJ were great appointments.
Thank you, Wethal. I suddenly feel better.
Bondi should resign and let Blanch take over.
Impeachment won’t work as the end result, but it would be a good tool to justify a very thorough investigation of Boassberg and force him to testify before Congress. Use the investigation and potential process violations to find other issues and conflicts of interests that could be used to bolster the case against him, just as they did against Trump. The goal is to make an example of Boassberg so that other “judges” think twice about their blatant overreach.
More importantly, Trump’s team needs to frame legislation to deal with these out of control lower district courts once and for all. These lower courts are under Congress’ jurisdiction. Trump can’t wait for Senator Lee or anyone else in the House / Senate to frame the legislation. The process would be for Trump’s legislative team to draft the legislation, with the help of key allies in the House and Senate, and then present it to Thune and Johnson for passage. Will be difficult to pass in the Senate, but then it will need to be folded into the budget reconciliation process or other parlimentary mechanism to get it done, just like the Democraps did to pass Obamacare and other legislation.
There are solutions to this problem that are within reach.
Depend on Thune or Johnson, you will be disappointed, as they are McConnell/McCarthy same old whine, in a brand new bottle.
PresidentcTrump does not have “key allies” in Congress, he is facing 535 snakes.
The upside to all of this is that John Roberts, by his sustained weakness, inaction and politicization, has set into motion the eventual depreciation of the entire federal Judiciary.
A judiciary that completely run outside of its historical Article III guardrails, has run off its jurisprudential rails, and that has abandoned all judicial restraint and temperament into a political ditch. This breakaway judiciary has been building for a very long time. Warren Burger substantially accelerated its degeneration.
The eventual result will be a significantly weakened Judicial Branch, one that better approximates that originally envisioned by the Founders.
And not the present imperial labyrinth of appointed robes that is bullying the other Branches.
To the benefit of both the Executive and Legislature.
PDJT only has to start that chain reaction by reeling back his excessive deference, and exercising his core plenary Article II powers in this instance.
This rogue judge has actually made it easy, by knowingly highjacking core Article II duties and powers.
National security is the unassailable exclusive citadel of the Executive. This judge has broken a core Constitutional firewall.
This Congress will watch, and then side with the Executive, as the judges retreat.
And then history will judge, John Roberts, harshly.
Thank you!
As a Canadian President Trump supporter it’s challenge
not to get angry with seeming impotence of your Republicans.
Democrats in power have no trouble in “throwing sh*t” at the wall.
That said the stable genius and “his crew” hold all the cards, and getting your economy going is paramount for the benefit of all.
Cheers!
You must be from Alberta.
😎
Nice one! Many would be surprised at the number of President Trump supporters here in British Columbia and other provinces.
Our media is more left and controlled than yours.
Our trucker rally’s were truly phenomenal, and I attended several.
It is good to remember that but not for President Trump all western nations would be in utter chaos, as the totalitarians of the worlds tightened their noose.
Cheers!
The Freedom Convoy forever changed my view of the Canadian people, to the positive anf the Canadian Govt. to the negative.
Cheers!
Roberts is Pilate; actually worse and less of a man than Pilate
because he does not try as Pilate did multiple times; bringing
Jesus in and out though weak and cowardly, afraid more for his
job and the consequences of losing his position, not facing the
truth by deflecting with his question “What is truth?”, not
waiting for an answer because he was indifferent to the deeper
moral philosophical implications of what the truth is. He did
this by responding with a cynical dismissal of Jesus’ claim.
Roberts claim?
“For more than two centuries, it has been established that
impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement
concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review
process exists for that purpose.”
Pilate afraid of losing his position/job with and responsibilty to
the Romans. Afraid of the people roused by the
Pharisees/Sadducees.
“What is truth?” retorted Pilate. Pilate’s question serves to
highlight Jesus’ innocence and the unjust nature of the
proceedings. Pilate indecisive, hoping to wash his hands of
responsibiliy stated (shoving responsibility to ‘custom); yet
asked) – forcing responsibility on the answers onto the crying
mob (this judicial mob)
“But it is your custom that I release to you one prisoner at the
Passover. So then, do you want me to release to you the King
of the Jews?”
He however, later declared that he found no basis for a charge
against Jesus. Washing himself off from facing the truth.
John 18:38
I keep reading that they are only exposing themselves to the people when they do these things but I’ve been of the opinion for a long time that they have such a grip on the judiciary and the various gov’t dept’s that they don’t worry about public opinion anymore.
They just do what they want and to hell with masses.
Roberts is the poster boy, it’s in his lap, he’s wrong and he doesn’t care.
He just stands there with that vacuous look on his face because He’s the Chief Justice so he can’t be wrong.
A very punchable face as well!
And I see it the opposite; that everything they do is cemtered on false narratives, which are intended to shape public opinion.
For instance, the lawfare cases during the 2024 campaign; they knew they woulld not prevail, but wanted the NARRATIVE.
Hence, they care very much about Public Opinion.
They took control of the legacy media and big tech social media, SO THAT they could shape public opinion.
And, PDJT is in the Oval, and Harris is not, because they have lost control of the ability to shape public opinion with their false narratives, because MAGA Media now dominates Legacy media, and thats because they have lost credibility.
America’s Turncoat Courts
https://newswithviews.com/americas-turncoat-courts/
So…..
How come there aren’t…..
50 District (State) Courts…..
ruling on federal and only federal law…..
in their state of judicial influence…..????
These District/State judges would be…..
appointed by Congress (reps/senators ??)….
with the President having a veto and…..
a 2/3 Congressional override……
and a case review process up…..
to the Supremes…..?????
Boasberg was president of the inn of courts in 2023
The Role of the Federal Courts
By Paul Engel
https://newswithviews.com/the-role-of-the-federal-courts/
Judicial Coup of activist District Court Judges.
Collect the Criminal Intelligence of this Judicial Coup
then Arrest & Prosecute the activist District Court Judges.
Supreme Law of Unelected Dictators
Lex Greene
https://newswithviews.com/supreme-law-of-unelected-dictators/
In the case of Ludecke v. Watkins, 335 U.S. 160 (1948), the Supreme Court itself Held that The Alien Enemy Act precludes judicial review of a removal order. Pp. 335 U. S. 163-166. So the Leftist judge Boasberg seems highly mistaken and has exceeded his authority (that is, if such a district court actually has authority over the President of the United States. I would argue that no court has authority over the President since the court and the executive are “co-equals.” And the Supreme Court, as a co-equal with the President, holds no authority over the President but may reach decisions that the President, in his discretion, may decide to enforce or not and to follow or not. The Court has no power to compel compliance.
The Act says:
“Whenever there is a declared war between the United States and any foreign nation or government, or any invasion or predatory incursion is perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States by any foreign nation or government, and the President makes public proclamation of the event, all natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of the hostile nation or government, being of the age of fourteen years and upward, who shall be within the United States and not actually naturalized, shall be liable to be apprehended, restrained, secured, and removed as alien enemies.” (emphasis added).
So Boasberg is saying there’s no declaration of war or incursion. Trump is arguing that Maduro was flooding the US with gang members from Venezuela, and that was the incursion.
Benefit of the Doubt/Presumption of Innocence is what the Judiciary has thrown out the window, yet these are designed by the Founding Fathers to be among the core principles our judiciary is founded upon.
The very idea President Trump is acting in good faith, and should be given the Benefit of the Doubt in the discharge of the responsibilities, is completely missing.
To state that just because one can accuse of being tyrannical one can dismiss these principles – is very dangerous ground.
Everywhere in this world Leftism rears its ugly mug, this kind of corruption and depravity follows.
What goes around, sooner or later comes back around.
And thats the basis for Boasbergs involvement.
IF it IS an incusion, he has no business intervening, however if it is NOT an incursion, he can intervene..
Why Supreme Court Opinions Are Not The “Law Of The Land”, And How To Put Federal Judges In Their Place
Publius Huldah
https://newswithviews.com/why-supreme-court-opinions-are-not-the-law-of-the-land-and-how-to-put-federal-judges-in-their-place/
.
This is naive, unfortunately. SOMEONE has to say what the Constitution means or applies to or does when there are differences of opinion regarding something that is unclear, e.g. does the Second Amendment permit individuals to have their own personal gatling guns or cannons. That “someone” is the Supreme Court, and that’s why, unless and until a decision is overturned by the Court, it is called “the law of the land”.
.
The way I see it trump and co. Need to expose John Roberts and Mary McCord /fisa court / Carter page woods file etc, to the American people.
These judges all along deferred to the President’s Department of Justice on matters of national security with respect to political prosecutions — but not to the President on matters of invasion or incursion? I’d love to hear how Boasberg threads THAT needle.
Imagine, if you will, 0bama was deporting criminal aliens and right wing judges were blocking him. Where would us Trump supporters be? We wouldn’t be supporting these right wing judges blocking the removal of criminal illegal aliens. Therein lies the difference between the left and right and saving America or not.
Given Congress has introduced articles of impeachment on Judge James Boasberg (Brandon-Gill-impeachment-Boasberg) doesn’t that qualify for a FISA Title I given his defense of a foreign terrorist organization?
None other than another HUSSEInBO appointee .. lying about ‘shutter down permanently’ leaving out ‘work at USAID being drastically reduced, including personnel – with some services being maintained – overseen by Rubio”
In his (Chiang) ruling he practically accuses PDJT of lying when he himself lies with impunity
Meet “President Chiang” who; like all of his ilk, thinks that he can read the minds of both the president and Elon Musk, all believing they also possess the power to overrule based on such assumptions. Facts be damned”
SOURCE :
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/03/have_you_met_president_chuang.html
Let Boasberg try to enforce the order..
The DOJ should just tell “Bias”berg to “go pound sand” due to Separation of Powers and the President’s Article II responsibilities. Let him find the Administration in contempt of court. He has no standing, no way to enforce the contempt, no way to prosecute the President while in or out of office due to immunity. If “Bias”berg threatens to charge others in the Administration, President Trump can issue a preemptive pardon. Hard for Democrats to impeach when they do not control the House and/or Senate, and the strongly popular President is in his last term. Bring it on!
Strip Boasberg of his security clearance on Monday and then send him what he wants marked classified on Tuesday morning with more black on the page than white. Works for the Democrats so why not in that case?????
Congress doesn’t have judicial powers. None of the branches of our government can convey their power to another branch of government. Congressional creation of the US District Courts, circa 1802 seems to be an unconstitutional overreach. The consequences as we see are judges beholden to the congressional scoundrels that put them into their seat without authority. The matrix needs to be reconfigured, and these judges need to go.
Sorry Simon,
Read your Constitution.
Provision for the creation of inferior courts below the SCOTUS is in the Constitution and Congress is tasked with creating them.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.278436/gov.uscourts.dcd.278436.50.1_1.pdf
Todd Blanche filing submitted to Chief Judge Boasberg
The DC Appeals Court agreed to hear the case on an expedited basis.
Wouldn’t that automatically stay Boasberg’s demands?
We know Obama’s term was unlawful and Biden also , he even admitted that the dem party stole the election.
Everything both accomplished should be null and void.
It will be interesting to see what happens with the women who couldn’t define what a woman was. Her tenure on the court may be short lived.
Insanity on Bordering!
The Midnight Tren de Aragua
USA proved too much for the man (too much for the man)
(He couldn’t make it) so he’ll be leaving the life he’s come to know, ooh
(We say he’s goin’) we say he’s goin’ back to find
(Goin’ back to find) ooh-ooh-ooh, what’s left of his world
The world he left behind not so long ago
He’s leavin’ (leavin’)
On that midnight Tren de Aragua (leavin’ on a midnight flight)
Mmm, yes
We said he’s goin’ back
(Goin’ back to find) to do simpler prison time
(And when he takes that ride) oh, yes, he is
(Homan be right by his side)
We won’t be with him (I know you won’t)
On that midnight Tren de Aragua (leavin’ on that midnight flight to prison)
Yeah, hey-hey-hey-hey (whoo-hoo!)
I’d rather you do time in your world (time in his world)
And live without you in mine (world, world)
(It’s his time, his and his alone)
He kept dreamin’ (dreamin’)
Ooh, that someday he’d be a big gangster
(big gangster, but he didn’t get far)
But he sure found out the hard way
That dreams don’t always come true (dreams don’t always come true)
Oh, no (ah-ah, no, ah-ah)
So he sold all his dope (whoo-hoo-hoo-hoo)
And he even sold your car, hm (whoo-hoo-hoo-hoo)
So we bought him a one way ticket back
To the life he once knew, oh, yes we did
Trump said we would
He’s leavin’ (leavin’)
On that midnight Tren de Aragua (leavin’ on a midnight flight)
Mmm, yes
Said he’s goin’ back
(Goin’ back to find) to do simpler prison time
(And when he takes that ride) oh, yes, he is
(Boasberg gonna be right by his side)
Judge, you got to be with him (I know we won’t)
On that midnight Tren de Aragua (leavin’ on that midnight flight)
Yeah, hey-hey-hey-hey (whoo-hoo!)
We’d rather ya’ll do time together (time in your world)
We’ll live without y’all in ours (world, world)
(It’s your honor’s time, and all your Cartel pals)
Oh, hey-hey (for love)
For love (gonna board)
You’re gonna board the midnight Tren to ride
For love (for love)
Gonna board (gonna board)
Gotta board the midnight Tren to go
For love (for love)
Gonna board (gonna board)
Uh-huh, the midnight flight to go
My world (for love)
His world (gonna board)
Trans-World, Airlines, your flyin’ coach (the midnight flight to go)
My world (for love)
His world (gonna board)
Our world, mine and his alone (the midnight Tren to go)
You’ve got to go (for love)
You’ve got to go (gonna board)
You’ve got to go, hey (the midnight train to go)
Y’all got to go (for love)
Y’all got to go (gonna board)
Mm-hm (the midnight Tren to go)
My world (for love)
His world (gonna board)
My plan: You go! (the midnight Tren to go)…
Rest in the Vine: Car-Tel Records presents: “Midnight Tren de Aragua” by Glad Its Night and the Wents!
as we know very well now, popularity contests are not all that meaningful of a measure of whether fascists can seize and wield power or not.
Actually, every action of our enemy, since 2015 is focused in large part on using manipulative narratives to try to direct public opinion.
IF they can degrade, thru attrition PDJT’s approval ratings enough, they can force him to resign, just like they did Nixon.
The threat that Republicans will vote to impeach has to be believable, and its only believable if, as with Nixon, a majority of the base either support Impeachment, or don’t oppose it.
I don’t foresee them being successful in lowering his support, hence the Impeachment route is yet another Lawfare endeavor, i.e. they know they won’t get conviction in the Senate, and are pursueing it anywsy, to impede his MAGA agenda as much as they can.
Only if they can get a Democrat majority in the SENATE, is conviction a real possibility, except they don’t wantvto vote to impeach, they wsnt to force resignation.
Have Thune or Johnson made any public statements about this Boasberg situation?
Article II Section I of the US Constitution
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Here’s the good news:
The good guys already know how this story ends.
The term “non-judiciable” has been placed into the lexicon for a reason by both Stephen Miller in a White House presser and Laura Ingraham in her interview with President Trump.
That’s the same Laura Ingraham who was a speechwriter for President Reagan and was a law clerk for Justice Clarence Thomas. That’s the same Laura Ingraham who President Trump showed the new Oval Office display of Declaration of Independence to.
This story ends nicely because after it has been determined that the President has plenary powers when carrying out his official duties, what’s next?
What’s next for the Lawfare crew? Where do they go next? What tools do they have left? The beach friends won’t be of any help now. They are completely defanged.
“What did you give us?” “We gave you a Republic if you can keep it.”
Slowly and steadily, in accordance with the rule of law, the Constitutional Republic is being restored.
what kind of enforcement alternatives does boasberg have?
It is not attempted enforcement. It is lawfare to inject the idea into people’s mind that Trump did something wrong. It is law fare to manipulate people to have a negative view of Trump and undermine his power.
Trump is doing only legal and lawful moves to benefit our country. The judge with the active, noisy support of dems and the silent support of repub’s are executing blatantly illegal, evil, and treasonous acts against Trump, the Constitution, this country, and We the People.
It is a deceptive hearts and minds campaign.
Yes I realize the judges strategy, but that strategy kinda falls apart if he cant do anything about it.
The globalist will tie him up in the courts, AGAIN, to slow him down with this damnable distraction.
My advice to Trump is this: Go harder, go faster, and FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT!!!
Now that sunlight has been cast on Roberts’ membership in the secretive club America Inns of Court which also includes radical America-hating judges James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Ketanji Brown Jackson, and Amit Mehta—all hard-left judges and Trump-haters, it’s clear SCOTUS has become partisan and bastardized. What’s next?
And how are cases that are supposed to b randomly assigned, making it only to these leftist, activist judges? Who is doing the assigning? I support Congressman Nehls’ House Res 229 that would remove Boasberg since SCOTUS fails to call an emergency review…
Judicial insurrection and Congress is silent…
The Judge lacks jurisdiction over the Chief Executive. Game over.
It’s no different than a President telling a Judge to reconvene a Court to satisfy a President’s opinion about a Court’s conduct.
Neither have a place in the other’s business.
The DOJ should tell Boasberg to pound sand. He has crossed out of the “Judge” role into petty dictator role. The USA cannot survive a squad of Alexandre de Moraes types!
I wonder what the FBI dossier on Judge Boasberg has in it?
He is on our side. Get Trump! Thats it.
Concentrate on fixing the voter fraud , democrats know they have no shot at winning a legit election .
The below is what happened in Trumps first term.
President Trump Targets Voter Fraud, Democrats Go Insane
https://newswithviews.com/president-trump-targets-voter-fraud-democrats-go-insane/
Same day in person voting, voter ID, paper ballots, hand counting must be required for federal elections.
We have the presidency, the house and senate. Why is Congress not acting on this?
States run their own elections, not Congress…as weird as that is.
But Federal elections have federal requirements.
I agree with you…. However:
If a State, through its actions, affects the wellbeing of another State, then I’d say there is enough to ensure limited intervention into that State’s doings.
If StateA steals the elections, it hits on StateB’s rights.
The draw out conclusion is that, StateB can then not recognize the Federal result until StateA conducts honest elections. I don’t know if this would ever happen, but the reasoning is that StateA is overreaching into StateB’s rights to a fair representation.
I believe the geniuses of the supreme court decided the states had no standing to interfere in an other states elections.
I think the key is the voters rights and civil rights act. In minority communities minority votes are being diluted by fraud and safeguards and federal observers need to be put in place.
frustratingly this was legally challenged by AG Paxton. Went to scotus. SCOTUS ruled: no standing.
essentially, sc rules that one state (A), does not have standing to sue another (state B) for state b failure to obey its own state constitution. The issue related to state b extended its voting deadline, both in casting, collecting and counting, as well as the unlawful use of drop boxes and other mail in ballot activities. The argument made by Paxton, which is as simple to understand that even a child who did not stay at a fancy hotel would realize without a teleprompter: when state B creates such a violation, it unfairly creates a different set of rules and outcomes of an election because other state’s are obeying the law. This in particular, because it is a NATIONAL ELECTION< where all states participate.
SCOTUS rules no standing!
the dissent written by Justice Thomas that best describes this ruling:
INEXPLICABLE!
God Bless America
Yeah, the idea that a state suing another state for FEDERAL election issues has no standing is outrageous. I’m outraged every time I think about it. Justice Roberts is a traitor to our nation. He knows what he’s doing and continues to do the work of the deep state by his (along with ACB) latest ruling and recent comment.
It’s fairly obvious that the DS has some sort of leverage over Roberts. Perhaps it’s an Epstein or similar file, or perhaps it has something to do with his adoption of those two Irish boys in which certain rules and regs were skirted to allow. It could be either of those two or something else entirely, but it certainly seems they have some type of sword of Damocles hanging over his head.
And for those truly traitorous acts he is clearly guilty of treason… res ipsa lowuitor… AND …
DESERVES a ONE-WAY trip to GITMO to receive his just reward !
*loquitor*. Dang autofill bot !
“the Congress may at any time by law make or alter such regulations, except as to the places of choosing Senators.”
states run them, but that does not mean there can’t be federal rules and standards that must be met to stop the cheating/fraud, and penalties if they do not comply, like their representatives not being seated or their votes not counted for the electoral college.
The Constitution requires that Election Laws be enacted by the State Legislatures, not bureaucrats, judges, election boards, the Secretary of State, etc. That was a main concern in the 2020 election controversy. All kinds of state officials were changing how ballots were cast by voters because of COVID, which was a national emergency, and the Constitution is not well known by much of the population. The Constitution requiring state legislature enactment changes of voting procedures is a requirement binding on all states. We can’t have some in compliance and others not.
Why does Congress not codify PT’s EO’s to keep the next president from changing them. This is what PT gets with a Mike Johnson who continues to be a thorn in the side of MAGA. We have got to make some noise that deafens the ears of Congress. Does anyone believe that MJ will put up for a vote…paper ballots, same day, hand count, ID? Once that is passed Congress will listen to the people.
Exactly, it’s interesting that nobody brings up this point.
They hate Trump and will and are sabotaging him, but they’re perfectly happy to ride his coattails.
to make new law requires a super majority. I just don’t think even though we have the house and Senate, any new law can be created. We would have to have a “perfect game” and also about 6 democrats if I have my math correct.
noting: some of the EO’s could be interpreted as changes to some textures of the constitution. If so, we would then go to ratification and there I also believe we would not have the majority of states to vote correctly.
for better or for worse, we have to follow the constitution…in terms of how to make new law and how to modify the constitution. Otherwise, we are no different than the criminal LAWFARE types.
having made that note, we also need to realize there are other ways to make changes to our state of play that do not require changing anything…ONLY PEOPLE.
maga in my view is not so much about changing law, as the people who are empowered to follow it, interpret it, apply it.
we have the WRONG PEOPLE IN DC AND OUR COURTS. it is just that simple.
we could have the perfect system of laws and these scoundrels would find a way to eff it all up.
God Bless America
For blatant treason >>> military tribunals during wartimes such as now obtain !
because there is no incentive to fix it. Republicans, like Democrats, enjoy being able to use election reform as a campaign item. As long as it is broken, they can campaign on fixing it. Once fixed what are they going to do?
After you “cast” your vote ….Please Stick your $&-?! & finger ? in the blue ink. Suck on it if you’re a loser.
Rick,
You read as though you’re simply a dickhead.
that was hiiiighly insensitive. hahahahaha….
That raises a related thought.
No one would think twice about screening police for pathologies of narcissism and related borderline disorders. I have long wondered of the benefits of also screening prosecutors and judges.
If there’s a syndromic hallmark to the typical leftist, the politics and political beliefs can be more of a masking behavior than a product of non-pathological logic. It can become a crutch, or so it seems; a means of masking the root disorders and venting the pathological and related serial distempers sometimes arising therefrom. Personalities like James Carville and the urban legend of HRC comes to mind. There is nothing new here.
Could this be pointing to the actual meaning our Constitution’s framers intended when they used the term “misdemeanor?”
Article III, Section 1: “The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, …”
I’ve long wondered if the framers meant in the course of their judicial duties should bad behavior arise from the personage of a sitting judge, it did not and could not arise from their office as such would constitute a misdemeanor.
Personality disorders, clinical distempers and pathologies of narcissism have been with humanity for a long long time. They are not new. It seems unlikely the framers would be unconcerned and ignore these issues in framing our nation’s constitution.
Reasonable people are becoming increasingly troubled with what might appear to some as shadows of psychopathy emanating from the modern judiciary, just as the framers apparently also feared.
That you aunt Bea?
Have to include address verification, Signature verification and Thumb Print verification. All can be done in mini seconds at the polls.
Fixing VOTER Fraud is the most important thing TRUMP can do in office for the country NOW and in the FUTURE. If not fixed shortly voter fraud will WIN the 2026 elections in the House and Senate and the country and TRUMP lose. It is all over if Voter fraud NOT fixed shortly.