Judge James Boasberg issues a three-page order [SEE HERE] demanding the Trump administration deliver cabinet level details about their criminal alien deportation operation.
Boasberg claims the information provided to him so far is “woefully inadequate,” and lacks the citations of what cabinet-level officials were involved in deporting criminal illegal aliens and Tren de Aragua gang members protected by a leftist immigration organization employing Judge Boasberg’s daughter.
Judge Boasberg appears to be focused on generating a contempt order against the Trump administration. Presumably, this would give Boasberg’s allied Democrats in congress a foothold for their needed 2018 election effort and another impeachment attempt.
“To begin, the Government cannot proffer a regional ICE official to attest to Cabinet-level discussions of the state-secrets privilege; indeed, his declaration on that point, not surprisingly, is based solely on his unsubstantiated ‘understand[ing],'” he said.
Boasberg then ordered the Trump administration to submit a brief by March 25 explaining why it did not violate his order by failing to return the individuals in question on the two earliest planes that arrived from El Salvador to the U.S. on March 15.
“By March 21, 2025, at 10:00 a.m., Defendants shall submit a sworn declaration by a person with direct involvement in the Cabinet-level discussions regarding invocation of the state-secrets privilege,” he added.
[SOURCE]
Boasberg had previously warned the Trump administration of consequences if it were to violate his order.
President Trump via Truth Social:
“Unlawful Nationwide Injunctions by Radical Left Judges could very well lead to the destruction of our Country! These people are Lunatics, who do not care, even a little bit, about the repercussions from their very dangerous and incorrect Decisions and Rulings.
Lawyers endlessly search the United States for these Judges, and file lawsuits as quickly as they find them. It is then the obligation of Law abiding Agencies of Government to have these “Orders” overturned. The danger is unparalleled! These Judges want to assume the Powers of the Presidency, without having to attain 80 Million Votes. They want all of the advantages with none of the risks.
Again, a President has to be allowed to act quickly and decisively about such matters as returning murderers, drug lords, rapists, and other such type criminals back to their Homeland, or to other locations that will allow our Country to be SAFE. It is our goal to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, and such a high aspiration can never be done if Radical and Highly Partisan Judges are allowed to stand in the way of JUSTICE. STOP NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS NOW, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.
If Justice Roberts and the United States Supreme Court do not fix this toxic and unprecedented situation IMMEDIATELY, our Country is in very serious trouble!”
why doesn’t Trump move to disbar these judges? Could they be removed from being a judge if disbarred, seems easier then getting 15 democrats for impeachment
Because individual state bar ethics boards or state supreme courts would have to be petitioned. And I doubt any board or court would do it.
Then Trump needs to put investigators onto Boasberg’s daughter, and the judge himself. No one would seek to keep criminal, murderous gangs free in America unless they were benefiting in some way. The money that the daughter receives for her work, is it coming from the proceeds of the crimes committed by the gangs etc They need to be exposed beyond being leftist lunatics. We need to put meat on the bones!
The American Bar Association is further left than the Judges.
Disbarment isn’t happening.
The House needs to pass resolutions immediately restricting jurisditions, defund
These courts and abolish these seats.
hey kennyp –
layman here, perhaps Sundance can help clear up. My understanding is,
1) judges do not get impeached, only removal is an option;
2) Congress can designate judges outside of USSC, and can likewise remove them for either bad behavior or by simply doing away with the court (ie: wash dc district judges – POOF! – and they’re gone)
2a) I did read somewhere that Congress has previously shunted this responsibility, or that to remove a judge requires Senate supermajority (and I think this wasn’t the case when Constitution was first ratified.
3) district judges have NO AUTHORITY WHATSOEVER over Executive exercise of authority under Article 2.
4) Heck, not even the USSC has been empowered to GOVERN the US; only Executive and – through laws, legislation – the Congress can do so. So Roberts’ comments supposedly scolding Trump are not only out of line, they are outside his bailiwick.
4a) USSC can and is authorized, however, to tell the courts how to or not to, what they can or can’t do, as judges. USSC can also rein in all this judicial resistance by lower court leftist scum, especially when it is clear to all that they are not exercising law, but rather using a combined/conspiratorial lawfare multiple points-of-attack to hamper Trump admin. But USSC can NOT tell Executive how to do their job, nor even tell Congress how to legislate.
5) Judges can only work on what their jurisdiction is, whether acts are IAW law or Constitution.
6) If a matter is of Constitutional import (and not just made up bullshit like this dickhead), then it goes to higher courts/appeal/USSC.
So, if we want these bozos gone, Congress has the power to do so.
Aside from that, Sundance, please help on above, except for some of my remarks which plainly reflect my personal bias and belief, of course, that scum like this deserves to be plopped in the middle of Greenland and made to walk back home.
executive privilege
noun
With regards to the stench from the bench and the feckless pussified Congress.
As we struggle daily with the digestion of revelations of evil and tyranny remember the Lord and his mercy and his power. Psalm 94 Do not yourselves be deceived by the spirit of this age.
If your one who thinks it does not matter, pray to expose them anyway and then tell us it doesn’t matter.
I see answer to prayer every day and I’m loving it. Thanks and Praise to the Lord through our high priest and king Christ Jesus
Outstanding! Word of the Lord is the last word on the matter.
May King David’s curse from Psalm 109 be laid upon all which seek Our Nations destruction.Amen
I think Roberts and others are stuck between two groups.
Those who know they’re on Epstein’s list and those about to find out they’re on Epstein’s list.
It’s time to play that card. Bondi, you’re up!
LOL like THAT will ever happen
AG Bondi serves at the pleasure of POTUS.
I am absolutely sickened by the feckless acquiescence being projected from the White House.
POTUS should step aside, go golfing, and let JD and the Marines handle this insurrection.
There are veterans and senior citizens living on the streets Mr. President.
In God We Trust
Trust God
Fear not
If it wasn’t for President Trump nothing would be getting handled.
The only reason ANYTHING is getting “handled” is because President Trump stepped UP ,not stepped ASIDE .
My guess is once they saw the list, they decided to go for convictions before they released it so the bad guys couldn’t get away. or take their lives. We might see dozens of simultaneous raids around the world, and then the information will come out. They call me a dreamer.
President Trump and his team are dealing with thousands of people and thousands of possible scenarios and outcomes .
He has taken a wrecking ball to the deepstate . And it’s opening cans of worms around the whole world .
You are not a dreamer.
It is basically President Trump and his team against the entire world . Everyday I wake up and read new headlines about another part of the deepstate destroyed ,
We are living in the greatest time in human history .
Have faith and enjoy the ride !
The best part is President Trump expects us as citizens and patriots just to keep living and working and taking care of our families and enjoy all of the winning .
Juge ROBERTS. A very suspicious collusion. Who’s blackmailing who?
Chief Justice John Roberts Caught in Secretive, Invite-Only Club of Elite Judges and Lawyers That Includes James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta and Ketanji Brown Jackson https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/revealed-chief-justice-john-roberts-caught-secretive-invite/
I think the Epstein Flight log angle is a red herring. The flight in question is from Palm Beach to Teterboro, not “Epstein Island”
President Trump has flown on the same itenerary. Nothing burger.
Boasberg broke the law. The Alien Enemies Act clearly states that it is NOT open for judicial review. Boasberg is reviewing it anyway. Anyone who violates federal law loses security clearance at the very least. Trump should revoke his security clearance. The judge should be arrested and prosecuted.
First, judges don’t “break the law” simply by interpreting it, even if you disagree with their interpretation. That’s literally their job: to review statutes, executive actions, and constitutional claims. The Alien Enemies Act gives broad power to the Executive, yes – but that doesn’t mean courts are forbidden from reviewing whether its application in a specific case violates constitutional protections like due process or equal protection.
Are there other attorneys posting here?
” but that doesn’t mean courts are forbidden from reviewing whether its application in a specific case violates constitutional protections like due process or equal protection.”
Why would criminal illegal alien gang members declared part of a terrorist organization be entitled to this?
simply because the daughter of the judge is working for an organization that is protecting them. Conflict of interest?
The weird thing is you appear to be a new poster whose soul goal is to defend the judicial attacks against the president of the United states, the will of the people, and the separation of powers.
I don’t see the point of your activity here as nearly all readers are fully aware of the agenda we are watching played out with every judicial ruling.
Furthermore, I’d guess that all readers hear know that the Democrats and the GOPe are in league to set up this president for impeachment as they were in his previous administration and will go to any length to accomplish that goal up to and including spying, planting evidence, and falsely imprisoning people with offers to let them out if they just lie about Donald Trump.
Maybe your posts would be more successful at Breitbart or FOX.
“Jackie Smith” is an example of exactly “WHY” people hate lawyers.
Breitbart – get a grip
Have you ever noticed Sundance’s header
Have you noticed the site has sucked since Breitbart passed. Or that they are full-on uniparty.
Thak you Lulu
Well said
It grinds me to read Jackie’s responses, then I think “Why?” For me, (only me!) it’s emotional so here’s my attempt at unemotional POV and thgs I first thought of reading JS’s comments on CTH several days ago.
If you throw out the possibility that JS is purposely clogging (is’t really) a comment section then I SAW benefits of someone providing a devil’s advocate POV. JS can make us think, become aware of how other side thinks.
I also considered, what if JS is fishing for info in our replies to help another side so they can come up with ways to respond on other sites or to provide sound bites?
Equal protection for illegal aliens?
Actually, they are members of a terrorist organization.
All cases should be in the military court.
Not in the DC kangaroo courts.
No federal judge has standing.
We are talking about illegally impeding and harassing the POTUS in his duties, but you can focus on “interpreting” as the crime.
Actual he did break the law. The Logan Act. He is not authorized to rule in matters of the Alien Act. He is interfering in foreign policy under an area he has no authority.
Judges are not charged with “interpreting” the law. Their DUTY is to declare the law AS IT IS WRITTEN.
‘First, judges don’t “break the law” simply by interpreting it.’ Typical lawfare BS statement.
This judge did much more than ‘interpreting it’.
Your position is just as much lawfare as is his.
Making a ruling without jurisdiction removes judicial immunity and is an act of judicial misconduct. Ruling are null and void. Remedies for this are criminal enforcement of laws, judicial discipline, bar complaints with potential disbarment, civil litigation against the judge, and don’t forget the big one TREASON.
It is the duty of the defendant to make a “special appearance” in court to avoid a default judgment while retaining the ability to challenge jurisdiction.
You are ignoring the fact that the number of challenges to this administration is unprecedented and is representative of a judicial coup.
These Judges are allowed to serve under good behavior, and judges and lawyers owe fidelity to both the spirit of the law as well as the rule of law.
They should be dismissed for blatantly breaking with the spirit of the law.
Excellent point…however, judges can “break” with their oath. THAT’s where the conflict arises. Collusion, conflict of interest and RICO come to mind.
The Clinesmith “sentencing” should be brought back up and Boasberg SHOULD be subpoenaed. HIs ties to Roberts need to be exposed…question is, who is going to do this? Roberts is severely compromised at this point and should have kept his mouth shut.
then properly executed………….
…..
Trump is very much in the wrong here, and he needs to careful with 2026 quickly approaching.
Nationwide injunctions exist because presidents aren’t kings. They allow the courts to pause potentially unlawful executive actions until full legal review can occur. That’s not judicial activism – that’s constitutional balance. When a federal judge halts a policy, it’s not because they’re trying to “assume the powers of the presidency” – it’s because part of their job is to protect citizens’ constitutional rights and ensure the Executive Branch follows the law.
If the orders being blocked are truly lawful and necessary, they’ll survive on appeal. That’s how the system works. And if you argue that judges shouldn’t have the power to halt potentially unconstitutional actions, you’re really saying presidents should be above the law – something conservatives traditionally oppose when the other party is in power.
So instead of blaming judges, the focus should be on crafting stronger, legally sound policy that can withstand judicial scrutiny. You don’t fix the republic by weakening the courts – you do it by respecting the limits of every branch, including the presidency.
And you are…????
Clearly someone who wishes to continue pretending. TROs and injunctions are exercises of a court’s equity jurisdiction, both of which require a party seeking such relief to not only overcome the presumption that the Executive Branch is acting in accord with its own oath of office but also to show a likelihood of prevailing on its claim that the government is acting without constitutional authority. The DC Circuit specializes in exercising its equity jurisdiction to thwart or punish Republican policy initiatives while pushing those of the Democrats.
Yes, courts must consider whether the Executive is acting within its constitutional authority, and yes, plaintiffs seeking TROs or injunctions face a high bar. But that bar isn’t insurmountable – and when it’s cleared, courts have a duty to step in. That’s not “punishment”; it’s oversight. The same equity principles were used to block Biden’s eviction moratorium and parts of Obama’s immigration orders. Were those rulings partisan, too?
Claiming the D.C. Circuit exists to “thwart Republican policy” ignores the fact that Republican-appointed judges sit on that bench and have authored many of its opinions. Courts don’t always get it right, but accusing them of bias every time they rule against your preferred policy is a slippery slope. Judicial review isn’t the enemy of democracy – it’s one of its guardians.
If the Executive Branch is confident in its constitutional footing, it should welcome scrutiny – not fear it. The idea that courts are only legitimate when they align with one side’s agenda is a far greater threat to the republic than any temporary injunction.
WE R AT WAR!!!!! WTF’s wrong with U?
since……09/11/2001…..
The real question here…is “where is Trumps legal team”? I’d like to see action not rhetoric. The Presidents plans are obviously being “ rolled” by numerous court actions…..where is OUR team?
We knew the Left would fight till its last breath to maintain power….stop bickering and take action to control this.
These judges stepped over the line from “oversight” or “Judicial review” into political activism and harassment. Maybe you could type out a common sense answer if you weren’t busy using both hands to pat yourself on the back.
Judges are required to recuse themselves from cases when their impartiality might reasonably be questioned, especially if they have conflicts of interest
. This is essential to ensure unbiased decision-making and uphold the integrity of the judicial process.
This is obviously 10000percent the situation with him.
He’s rouge and over stepping his boundaries.
“Yes, courts must consider whether the Executive is acting within its constitutional authority, and yes, plaintiffs seeking TROs or injunctions face a high bar. But that bar isn’t insurmountable – and when it’s cleared, courts have a duty to step in.”
You are saying that any federal judge can oversee POTUS.
Every and all situations.
Really?
Dear Jackie,
My understanding is that only the Supreme Court and its judges, is the third balance to the Congress and Senate, (which two constitute ‘the Government’, and the President, the Executive).
The Supreme Court, only being a court of review, and not able to make legislation itself, is inferior to the other two branches.
All other courts were established either by Acts of the Government, or by the Executive (ie President Donald Trump) as minor tribunals ruling on areas such as minor rules of departments.
None of the minor or inferior courts are in the Constitution and can be abolished by Acts of the Government or by the President.
The inferior court Judge is totally out of order. He has not the rights you are giving him. Even the Supreme Court would not order the president around the way this Judge is doing.
If your view is accepted, this would lead to any Tom Dick or Harry minor court magistrate being able to checkmate the President and/or the Government.
This is a crisis equal to any of the great law crises we have read about in our history books.
Who is the plaintiff? Seems to me the plaintiff is the judge.
I just can’t understand why they are wasting their time and/or the money of the people who pay them to post at CTH. They will convince no one that reads here.
You’re arguing with a bot.
The Jack Smith 🥸, apparently.
A person totally disassociated with truth and facts.
Jackie “Chiles” Smith
NONE OF THIS AFFECTS “CITIZENS.”
Actually, it does. President Trump’s actions make our citizens safer. Boasberg wants foreign murderers, rapists and drug dealers loose on the streets to terrorize our citizens.
Seems like experts in Constitutional law do not agree with you at all about what these district judges are doing and continue to do. Apparently those judges, according to the experts like Levin and Dershowitz for example, have no authority over the Executive branch in these matters nor should a local district judge be able to invoke nationwide injunctions. The Constitution is pretty clear about that, there have been settled cases from the SC that addressed it and just about every legal expert out there agrees that these judges do not have the authority to tell the Executive branch what to do.
Your suggestion to strengthen the legal policies to be stronger can still be done in conjunction with telling these district judges to go back to their legal corner and stop harassing the President and his authority to do the job that the people hired him to do based on his promises to clean up the swamp and protect our tax dollars from corruption and waste.
Okay, experts like Levin and Dershowitz have voiced strong opinions, but constitutional law isn’t determined by talking heads.
There is significant legal debate over nationwide injunctions – and there are also Supreme Court decisions affirming the judiciary’s power to review executive actions and issue injunctions when constitutional rights are at stake. Judges don’t “command” the Executive Branch – they check it, as part of the balance of powers the Founders carefully designed.
Nationwide injunctions can be problematic, fine – but they’ve been used under both Democrat and Republican administrations. If the issue is truly about judicial overreach, then the remedy is through legislation or Supreme Court clarification – not by demanding district judges “stay in their corner” like they’re disobedient children. That’s not how the judiciary works in a constitutional republic.
If we believe in the Constitution, we need to respect it even when it’s inconvenient. That includes allowing courts to pump the brakes when they see executive actions that may violate rights. Otherwise, we’re not defending law and order – we’re undermining it.
Levin And Dershowitz? We know at least one of them has been to Epstein’s beaches.
The besotted Leftoids broke Constitutional Law every which way they could from at least Bronco Bamas fist day in Office. All the way to today. Funny how no (R) Federal Judges went off the deep end with unenforceable TROs..
THOSE 2 are the LEGAL EXPERTS??????
CRUSH this NOW.
They are legal experts.
I never said they are likeable.
SO IS STEVEN MILLER, F Levin + Dershy
“……… affirming the judiciary’s power to review executive actions and issue injunctions when constitutional rights are at stake.”
What constitutional rights do criminal illegal aliens have?
Exactly this!
Apparently more than the J6 political prisoners from the Reichstag Coup operation.
Dershowitz is hardly a “talking head”. Nor is Mark Levin.
Boasberg is a known leftist judge and is out of his lane on this one…and so are you.
Megyn Kelly is right on with her video below:
https://x.com/DoctorCanDo/status/1902296468813238592
Ugh I have to atleast agree they both are talking heads at this point.
That part can not be denied . Even tho I don’t agree with everything she says.
X
What constitutional RIGHTS do murdering, raping criminal illegal INVADERS have? WE LEGALLY sent them back to their own country where they will have their home country’s punishment. Many judges like Boasberg are exactly DISOBEDIENT lunatics. Quit pretending you don’t see what Boasberg is attempting. Bad Kitty’s revelation aboutt Roberts, Boasberg, Jackson and others tells us that these cretins are TRAITORS!!
You know exactly what they are doing, but continue to waste your time and every CTH reader’s time by posting here. There are plenty of sites online where your posts might sway uninformed people.
Was opening the borders to all comers “constitutional”?
Was revoking voter i.d. laws and allowing election day to morph into election month “constitutional”?
Both of those oft-repeated actions directly impacted the lives, security, and property of many legal, taxpaying American citizens. Is that “inconvenient” fact “constitutional”?
Then why is it Republican judges sit on their hands when lawless, rogue Presidents usurp the highest seat in the country with blatant voter fraud?
The jurisdiction of all inferior courts created by Congress, in cases of the Alien Enemies Act, is contained right in the statute, Section 23. What the judge is to do when an alleged Alien Enemy is reported to judge, the steps the judge is to take to determine the alien’s status, and how the judge is to CONFORM the judge’s actions to the President’s Proclamation and any other regulations the President enacts concerning Alien Enemies.
It isn’t even debatable that Boasberg is completely outside the boundaries of the jurisdiction set by Congress in keeping with Article 3, Section 2 of the Constitution.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/23
Attorney Alan Deshowitz has achieved a certain understanding of the Constitution and a level of appellate advocacy so as to place him in a class far superior to and different than a “talking head.” And as far as stating the “Founders carefully designed” the balance of powers, I find it significant that the Founders supplied the Supreme Court with NO power to enforce its orders. It relies purely on the discretion of the President. As Hamilton wrote in Federalist 78. the judicial branch remains inherently the weakest because it lacks the power to enforce its judgments, relying on the executive branch for execution, and has no control over the “sword” or the “purse.” The judiciary possesses “neither force nor will,” but only “judgment.”
So if the Chief Executive in its judgment arrives at a conclusion different from the Court and refuses to abide by or to enforce a court order, the court is out of luck. The Court achieves ascendancy in a given matter ONLY because the other two branches allow the court to do so. If the Chief Executive repudiates a Supreme Court order (let alone a district court order), then only the Congress through impeachment by the House and conviction by the Senate may gain redress and vindicate the Court’s order. THAT is the delicate balance infused by the Founders into the Constitution. All the rest is just clap trap.
And by the way: In the case of Ludecke v. Watkins, 335 U.S. 160 (1948), the Supreme Court itself Held that The Alien Enemy Act precludes judicial review of a removal order. Pp. 335 U. S. 163-166.
Where did you get your law degree from?
Wayne State U. Law School (Detroit), noted as the worst law school in the U.S. Two – time perjurer Michael Cohen is an alumnus.
G’morning CJ. No need to “feed” Jack Smith. Its arguments are circular and totally gloss over what a U.S. CITIZEN is. This Boasburg case deals with Criminal Aliens…NOT OF HIS PERVIEW. The inferior courts are “made up”… and I dare say “unconstitutional” (i.e. not delineated via the U.S. Constitution).
All well and good, except, how much legal review is needed to remove criminals who are here illegally?
Deporting ILLEGALS, especially gang members, is ALREADY strong, and legally sound policy. It IS ALREADY LAW. Further, you don’t fix a corrupt judiciary by playing their game.
If Roberts doesn’t fix it, and Congress won’t fix it, then soon enough the People will fix it and not in a way petty tyrants like Boasberg will find pleasant.
You assert that President Trump “is very much in the wrong”, but how? It is not precedent and not acceptable to grind the executive branch to a halt via frivolous litigation and nonsensical rulings from conflicted judges who should have recused.
Re: recusals: conflict of interest standards are clear. Simply disagreeing with a judge’s ruling doesn’t mean they’re compromised. If anything, claiming every unfavorable ruling is illegitimate sounds less like a legal argument and more like a refusal to accept checks and balances. That’s not how a constitutional republic functions.
Disagreeing with A ruling is one thing. Having more than 120 such rulings by the same group is a bit telling.
Yep. Chuck Schumer Says the Quiet Part Out Loud: ‘We Did Put 235 Progressive Judges – on the Bench and They Are Ruling Against Trump Time After Time After Time’ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/chuck-schumer-says-quiet-part-loud-we-did/
“Progressive” is the keyword. If Schumer just said “Judges,” it would mean the judges were not biased ideologically, but just acted as judges. The adjective “progressive” clearly indicates their ideological biases influenced their rulings.
Very telling just like his ,”six ways to Sunday”, comment
Basically, Chucky Boy called the spook agencies criminals.
Jackie is starting to “glow”.
I would argue that what Trump is doing now IS part of the checks and balances of our Constitutional Republic. All three branches must have checks and balances.
Ain’t NOBODY checked or balanced on voter fraud! That is how we got Obama!
You are a legal clown. If a cop pulls me over for speeding and writes me up for a busted tail light, that’s hardly police harassment. If a cop parks outside my house every day and waits for me to pull on the public road and immediately pulls me over to inspect my car … every day … that harassment.
You can join Judge Boasberg in the bullying lawyer department. You probably flunked legal ethics.
There is not a doubt he should be recused in this situation his ties are a complete conflict of interest.
That cannot be a part of your argument if you are trying to be serious. If it is it’s laughable.
This one is illegitimate since Boasberg violated Section 23 of the statute which sets forth the limits of his jurisdiction. Boasberg can’t overrule measures the President takes to remove Alien Enemies. That is not in his jurisdiction as set forth by Congress in black and white in the statute in question. Boasberg is limited to the four corners of the President’s Proclamation and any other regulations the President promulgates.
Judges are in similar jurisdictional problems questioning measures taken under USA PATRIOT ACT measures such as declaring MS-13 and Tren de Aragua as Terrorist Groups and therefore Enemy Combatants.
part of their job is to protect citizens’. That pretty much voids your argument and Boasberg’s. But we are in a post Constitutional time, so it may come about that Tren de Aragua are all ‘citizens’ as is every illegal alien.
Hello Jack Smith are you the “special” prosecutor Jack?
“Nationwide injunctions ” are NOT provided for with the exception of the SCOTUS….period dot.
Try again.
Jack Smith in drag…great visual!
He’s transitioning..
Yes – the Constitution doesn’t explicitly mention nationwide injunctions, it also doesn’t explicitly prohibit them. Federal district courts have the authority to issue equitable relief under the Judiciary Act of 1789 and subsequent case law. That includes, at times, nationwide injunctions – especially when a federal policy affects people across the country.
Period. Dot.
Actually it doesn’t. Specifics acts are not the domain of the district court. This is one. It is the code.
Additionally there are SC ruling that support this. This judge is not applying the law in at least 2 different areas beyond the Presidential authority to protect the county.
For those who say we have three co-equal branches of government, that’s not true…originally.
As Alexander Hamilton points out in Federalist No. 78, the Judicial Branch is the weakest branch. All they can do is issue orders and judgments – they can’t enforce their orders and judgments. They must rely on the Executive Branch to carry them out:
Ah, attempting “the COTUS is silent” gambit. Too clever by half. 😄
It is the President’s duty to deport illegals period.
The judge has no authority and is breaking the law by demanding the President to leave criminals on the streets to harm or kill American citizens.
In fact, what the hell are the police doing in all 50 states about these criminal illegals….absolutely nothing.
Your comment belongs on MSLSD.
Of course the President has a constitutional responsibility to enforce immigration laws, including deportations. But that authority isn’t absolute. It must operate within the bounds of the Constitution and laws passed by Congress. When courts step in, they’re not saying “leave criminals on the streets” – they’re saying, “follow due process.” That’s the cornerstone of American justice, even for people you think don’t deserve it.
THOSE PEOPLE DEPORTED ARE ILLEGALS.
AND ILLEGAL CRIMINALS TO BOOT.
They must be deported
Since when do illegal aliens who rape murder and pillage have any standing in the US?
Deport them
They don’t. This creature is trying to derail CTH. You can even tell by their tone and phrasing who they vote for and their ideology.
Honestly? They’re armed and an invasion by them has been declared. We should skip the deportations a nd trials and just have our military take them out.
If the lawless judges make enforcing the law impossible, then it’s time to remove the law from the equation entirely. It’s a war costing 100,000 US citizens their lives every year. Treat it like a war and treat those trying to give aid and comfort to the enemy invaders accordingly.
HAHA Jackie is an f’ing CHAT GBT IA generated response, SO OBVIOUS
I think you were right. Jack and Jackie are IA chatbots so I wish people would stop trying to hold a discussion with something that not is not even human.
To add to Jack’s statement of “It must operate within the bounds of the Constitution and ONLY those laws passed by Congress which are pursuant to the Constitution”.
As Jocelyn Nungaray’s mom about due process. Ask the j6s about due process, ask Carter page about due process.
Why couldn’t Julian Asssange get that privilege of such sacared due diligence? Reason given then was because he’s not a citizen? So criminal gang members yes? But people that heroically uncovered where the government broke their constitutional responsibilities not?
Has anyone else noticed that many trolls use a complete name, albeit fictional.
Whereas the rest of us who we trust and have been vetted by our posts pick curious nicknames that have meaning to us.
Odd isn’t it?
Best to ignore…! Them
I don’t have to agree with everything Trump does. If you want to, that’s your choice.
It feels like you prefer tribal gatekeeping than actual insight.
Insight is fine, ignorance is another. Tren de Aragua is a lawfully recognized terrorist organization by the US Government and you also ignore the fact the judge has a clear conflict of interest. The judge’s expansion of the suit to cover all deportation flights and not just the plaintiffs before his court compounds that conflict of interest.
“I don’t have to agree with everything Trump does. If you want to, that’s your choice.”
That’s right, you do not have to agree. But, thus far, why wouldn’t you?
I have followed contributors on this site for many years. Therefore, I know that the overwhelming number of treepers ARE critical thinkers, DO their own research, have actual insight and are free thinkers.
IMHO, Jackie Smith, you sound like you could be part of an organized “tribal gatekeeping” initiative funded by anti-American sources.
Sometimes the name is real. Are you afraid to post under your real name?
Dox me not
That fine theory might apply to law-abiding judges without nefarious intentions, but clearly that’s not what we have here.
I’m not buying what you are selling concerning President Trump being in the wrong.
As the head of the Executive branch, he is responsible for ensuring he can properly oversee and operate it.
Interference by activist judges, like in his 1st term, hamstrung his ability to oversee and operate the executive branch of government properly.
The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court needs to take the activist judges in hand. Will he? I’m skeptical.
If Trump as Chief Executive sits on his hands then the activist judges win.
The Chief Justice of the Judicial branch needs tk
Don’t hold your breath waiting for help from Roberts. These are his friends (comrades)
REVEALED: Chief Justice John Roberts Caught in Secretive, Invite-Only Club of Elite Judges and Lawyers That Includes James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta and Ketanji Brown Jackson
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/revealed-chief-justice-john-roberts-caught-secretive-invite/
You are insufferable, good day.
The American people are the final arbiter not a district judge or even a SC judge. If we don’t like what Trump is doing we fix that at the ballot box. Judiciary is not over Executive or Legislative. Equal branches.
I am a black robed tyrant on the public dole.
I have just decreed the most vile, dangerous criminals be released from prison and quartered in YOUR home with you.
Your protests surely indicate your racist tendencies, so you will be disarmed as you host your guests.
Make sure they are well fed, comfortable, and their every desire is tended to.
Of you’ll be hauled back here for more of my wise “justice”.
Now don’t get all bent out of shape. You’ll surely survive on appeal to my fellow robed tyrants .
Respect my athoritah…
It has come to this…your post is no understatement. This is how close to a repetition of history we are with this Constitutional crisis.
Judicial overreach by clearly hyper partisan men and women in black robes who are indicating they would have no problem going much, much further.
All which is needed to finish off this Republic are those willing…nay, eager…to enforce their diktats by whatever means.
Power or the desire for it is a hideous aphrodisiac.
Worth a read…
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2025-03-20/judicial-coup
James Madison:
The States, in their sovereign capacity, are the parties to the constitutional compact; and are thus the final authority on whether the federal government has violated the Constitution. There can be no tribunal above the authority of the States to decide whether the compact made by them has been violated by the federal government. (p 192)
That if, when the federal government usurps power, the States dont stop the usurpation, and thereby preserve the Constitution, there would be no relief from usurped power. This would subvert the Rights of the People as well as betray the fundamental principle of our Founding. (p195)
That the Judicial Branch is as likely to usurp as are the other two Branches. Thus, the Sovereign States have as much right to judge the usurpations of the Judicial Branch as they do the Legislative and Executive Branches. (p196)
That all 3 Branches of the federal government obtain their delegated powers from the Constitution; and they may not annul the authority of the States. And if the Judicial Branch connives with other Branches in usurping powers, our Constitution will be destroyed. (p196)
So the Judicial Branch does not have final say as to the rights of the parties to the constitutional compact. Otherwise, the delegation of judicial power would annul the authority delegating it; and the concurrence of the judicial branch with the other branches in usurping powers, would subvert the Constitution forever. (p196)
If Congress won’t support the Executive and end this coup and the States don’t play their part and call for and end to this coup (26 AG of states are already doing this about the deportations?) then….
The President must annul the actions of the judiciary by ignoring them.
The SCOTUS is not to be trusted and I give you the example of banning school prayer. The states and local governments should have ignored this “law” un-supported by the Constitution. Nullification! Other examples of writing law from the bench were abortion and Obamacare twistingly interpreted as a tax by the current CJSCOTUS.
wrong
https://x.com/doctorcando/status/1902296468813238592
What’s your opinion on conflicts of interests and recusal?
When there are secret clubs with “invite only” standards AND SECRET MEETINGS involving Boasberg being the PRESIDENT of the whole rotten thing, CRY HAVOC!!! With members of SCOTUS such as Roberts and Jackson a part of it and also attended by the DOJ, it’s time for full transparency!! This stinks to high heaven!! You could very well be one of them.
Lol
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/114200269495299138
Or everyone reading here and the administration are well aware that the goal is to deny the president the ability to implement his policies – approved by 80 million voters – by delaying their implementation until the midterms where he will lose the House and also be a lame duck.
We now have judges telling the administration who can work for them and where they can work and what their jobs should be. And the same judges get assigned over and over to these cases almost as if it isn’t random.
Add to that, these judges often have blatant conflicts of interest or have openly stated their extreme prejudice against Donald Trump.
But you keep on lecturing us about how stupid we are for noticing the corruption and the obvious agenda because we’re just big, dumb, stupid MAGA voters who can’t understand these things.
Trump is, by his actions, exposing corrupt judges.
Lol it take 5 sc judges to make nation law. Your full of bs. The court is weaken by making improper rulings. This one judge has abused his power with this ruling, J6 and Fisa.
“it’s because part of their job is to protect citizens’ constitutional rights” They are not citizens, and furthermore they are here illegally and are criminals. You may also recall, and choose to ignore the fact that Justice Thomas and several other SC justices have warned about these minor judges overreaches. It should be obvious that if the left, as they are doing, make a concentrated effort to rule against every action the President/executive branch take and can halt it until it works its way through the courts, they will have quite effectively thwarted the ability of the executive branch to function. “Chuck Schumer Says the Quiet Part Out Loud: ‘We Did Put 235 Progressive Judges – on the Bench and They Are Ruling Against Trump Time After Time After Time’ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/chuck-schumer-says-quiet-part-loud-we-did/
”
Jackie, you suck as a troll. That’s too bad since you claim to be a lawyer. You seem to think you can string meaningful phrases together to deflect away from the fact that Boasberg is corrupt.
Yawn. It’s like listening to a Karen throw out medical jargon to demand everyone wear face masks to prevent Covid.
You just look stupid.
You are in the wrong here.
“Descoping” has been conceived, not because courts have paused potentially unlawful executive actions, rather because courts have dictated the government response to broadly written laws.
The entire environmentalist movement relies on courts ordering government responses that promulgate regulations and spend public funds to achieve narrow ends, such as saving the Delta Smelt. It is proactive, not reactive, action, thus it encroaches on the executive function.
It is the task of the executive to implement public policy, so when judges seize power by ordering government responses to legislation, they usurp a function reserved to be evaluated by the people and changed, if necessary, by elections of their representatives. We elect the executive branch of our government to fulfill the implementation function of faithfully executing the laws.
Elections have consequences. We are not going to turn back the clock to when a King once ruled and appointed judges with plenary power to rule in his name. Now we have checks and balances on judicial power, and descoping is how royalist judges will be limited. This will be a task of Congress, which has been remiss in allowing the judiciary a very large scope. Now that the judiciary has crassly challenged the President, it will be for Senator Grassley and his colleagues to start to set some boundaries.
Jackie just showed up the other day to be our lawfare apologist.
Ignore the troll.
Jackie Smith,
President Trump needs to be careful with 2026 approaching?
LOL! It’s a slam dunk against a Democrat party hell bend on destroying the country and defending terrorist gangbanger.
Before this is over, the only people voting for Democrats will be college professors, teachers, and Tesla burners
So instead of blaming judges, the focus should be on crafting stronger, legally sound policy that can withstand judicial scrutiny.
Lawfare doesn’t respect any law or policy. It about optics, and I’d say they are going in the wrong direction defending these criminals.
executive privilege
noun
Where in the Constitution does it empower a district court judge to tie the hands of the President? Congress created these district courts and nowhere does it say those district courts are a co-equal with the Executive. In fact, one might argue that even if Congress bestowed through legislation the ability of a district court to compel or otherwise interfere in the Executive’s conduct, it would unconstitutional?
Chief Justice John Marshall, in the matter of Marbury v. Madison considered two issues: 1) whether the Supreme Court could issue a court order to force President Madison to deliver a commission to Marbury, and 2) whether the Judiciary Act of 1789, which authorized such a court order, was constitutional. While Justice Marshall acknowledged Marbury’s right to a commission and stated Marbury had a right to seek a remedy, Marshall ultimately ruled that the Supreme Court could not issue the court order because the section of the Judiciary Act of 1789 that allowed the court order was unconstitutional.
Marshall stated: “By the constitution of the United States, the President is invested with certain important political powers, in the exercise of which he is to use his own discretion, and is accountable only to his country in his political character, and to his own conscience.
“In such cases… whatever opinion may be entertained of the manner in which executive discretion may be used, still there exists, and can exist, no power to control that discretion. The subjects are political. They respect the nation, not individual rights, and being entrusted to the executive, the decision of the executive is conclusive. . . .”
So, a key issue focuses on whether the disposition of illegal alien terrorists resides within the President’s unfettered executive discretion? And a second issue focuses on whether a district court may, by injunction, interfere with that disposition? It may be that that second issue has never been directly decided by the Supreme Court. It seems that the act of Congress on which the president relies bars the court from reviewing the president’s discretion is enforcing that law.
In addition, one might further argue that the Constitution only creates the co-equal (but weakly empowered) Supreme Court. And might one also argue that Congress has no right to create another court that stands as the president’s co-equal, since by the terms of the Constitution only the Supreme Court stands as the president’s “equal”; and therefore, only the Supreme Court might attempt to constrain a president—AND whether that court’s “attempt” to constrain succeeds depends on whether the president allows it to succeed.
The only remedy available if the president decides not to submit to any order of the Supreme Court would be impeachment by the House and conviction by the Senate super majority. At least two precedents stand in Trump’s favor: that of Andrew Jackson’s refusal in the case of Worcester v. Georgia in 1832 and that of Lincoln’s ignoring the order of Chief Justice Taney in the matter of Ex Parte Merryman in 1861. Despite holding Lincoln’s order unconstitutional, Taney acknowledged that he had no way of compelling the president or military authorities to comply with his ruling. As Chief Justice Taney’s acknowlegement points out: Where in the Constitution does it bestow the ability to compell a president to comply with a court ruling? Nowhere.
In Federalist Paper #78, Hamilton points out that the judicial branch remains inherently the weakest because it lacks the power to enforce its judgments, relying on the executive branch for execution, and has no control over the “sword” or the “purse.” The judiciary possesses “neither force nor will,” but only “judgment.” As these activist Leftist judges reveal themselves through their attempts to interfere in so many areas of presidential discretion, the “judgment” and credibility of the judiciary erodes by the hour.
OK, you seem to fancy yourself an expert in these matters.
Perhaps you can enlighten us by quoting the text from the Constitution that give a judge the right to order actions in matters of national security.
Also – please explain how the District of Columbia is the proper jusrisdiction for events that transpired in the Fifth District.
We will all be breathlessly waiting for your post.
…”that’s how law work”… in the US CORP…..luckily we are in the transition to ..Constitutional Republic….Jackie buckle up….
Oh and the “zero” and “vegetable” president’s EO’s were not challenged at all and were proper. Give me a break. Go preach to another choir that agrees with your views. There is a limit to the absolute illegality, according to our Constitution and Article II, with what these crooked, biased judges are doing. It is blatantly obvious they are following their “masters” wishes to thwart every agenda, that benefits the people, that President Trump is trying to achieve. Give it a rest please.
Judges are not kings either. Heard of separation of powers? So, sending terrorist and felonious criminals who are in this country illegally is unconstitutional? I think not. Judge boasberg is simply a left-wing partisan hack as all the others. Research his history with Russia gate, FISA warrants that are illegal, etc. You have a judiciary that, unfortunately, has been politicized. Look at all the judges “shopped” that have issued TRO’s. Mostly biden/obama appointees, I’d say 90% or close. This alone is garbage.
“… looking for publicity, and it cannot be for any other reason”
Sounded like a shot across Roberts’ bows to me. There damn well are other reasons.
So this judge would have to rule against himself? It’s the judge/against the government? Who are the plaintiffs in the case? They have standing?
Any communications with our friends Mary or Norm?
Military tribunal. NOW.
I think that is exactly where this is headed. Trump had to be war gaming these scenarios. SCOTUS are COWARDS and Congress is inept.
CONgress is complicit, not inept. Big difference.
Following court orders and edicts from these out of control and conflicted judges only emboldens them to keep the charade going.
In President Trumps first term the Deep State was able to slow down MAGA and run out the clock on Trumps first term.
They are attempting to do the same thing this time but using the courts and compromised judges.
They are trying to slow down MAGA and undermine our progress using lawfare but with judges this time.
Give them no legitimacy!
Roberts, Johnson, and Thune watch in silence.
Well, well, well, Lookee here, Bad Kitty found some secret meetings involving CJ Roberts, “President” Boasberg, Ketanji Jackson, AND the DOJ . HMMMMM. It’s on Gateway Pundit.
Not that American Inns of Court “bombshell’? It’s public group of lawyers and judges.
https://home.innsofcourt.org/
There’s even a drop-down menu if you want to join.
@ProfMJCleveland
8h
ICYMI Judge’s order in Venezuelan terrorists removal actually proves Trump Administration point that it didn’t violate Minute Order because they had already been removed when Minute Order saying “don’t remove” hit
https://nitter.poast.org/ProfMJCleveland/status/1902912097043816534#m
Trump invoked the state secrets doctrine. US v. Reynolds (1953)? I didn’t think a judge was allowed to inquire into what the state secrets were.
Roberts Fix it? He’s part of it.!
lol…Trump should release the dirt on this dirtbag…
NO MERCY!
I have thought for a long time these judges should be investigated privately and then have all their dirty laundry leaked. It’s one of the only ways to fight back against the tyranny.
This is the way: Ignore the judges. Focus on the criminals whilst ongoing court battles. The people (voters) can understand this. Let Democrats be the accessories to Tren de Aragua, MS13, killers and rapists.
According to federal authorities, two brothers of the Venezuelan illegal alien who attacked and murdered 22-year-old Georgia nursing student Laken Riley, will be deported along with their former roommate — after entering a guilty plea to being in possession of fraudulent green cards.
In a case that turned into a hot spot over illegal immigration, Jose Ibarra, 27, was found guilty in November of murder and other charges related to Riley’s death. He was given a life sentence without the prospect of release.
According to the Justice Department, his brother, Diego Ibarra, 29, was arrested after providing a fake green card to a police officer investigating the February 2024 murder.
A news statement from the department explained that agents also discovered fake Social Security cards for Jose Ibarra’s brother, Argenis Ibarra, 25, and roommate Rosbeli Flores-Bello, 29, in the apartment they lived at with Diego and Jose.
Additionally, the brothers admitted to police that they had fraudulent green cards in their possession.
https://www.oann.com/newsroom/two-brothers-and-roommate-of-laken-rileys-killer-jose-ibarra-to-be-deported/
You can’t claim to be defending law and order while saying, “Ignore the judges.” That’s not tough on crime – it’s soft on constitutional principles. The same judicial system that rightfully convicted Jose Ibarra also protects the rights of every citizen and ensures due process for all accused.
Bot bot bot talk
The judge is not conforming with his jurisdiction as described in the statute by the Act of Congress known as the Alien Enemies Act, and he is ignoring past SCOTUS case law that such deportation actions are not subject to judicial review. This is judicial review. It is BOASBERG who is ignoring the Rule of Law.
They all sound like Boasberg’s kind of people.
If the dem commies get the house they will put forth articles of impeachment no matter what.
Let the commies die on their hill protecting criminals on our streets.
What is this? Commies part 35 clown movie?
President Trump needs to just IGNORE them.
I think at this point, Trump needs to address the nation and explain the judicial insurrection that is underway.
Explain how judges are in favor of protecting vicious gang violence over the safety of the American people. Explain how the money laundering operation of USAID works and how judges are in favor of continuing that. Explain how judges now are trampling over his role as Commander in Chief. Name names. Use examples. Detail the lack of interest and lack of intervention on the part of the Supreme Court.
Explain the constitutional crisis that we are in and the crossroad we are at. Put it in historical context with previous Presidents facing the same issue(Lincoln, Jackson). He should say that he is prepared to continue to work on behalf of the American people that elected him provided that there are at least 34 patriotic Republican senators that will choose America First over rouge unlawful judicial insurrectionists. Contact your Republican senator and let them know whose side you are on and whose side you want them to be on.
Go for broke. Let’s see who has his back in the Senate and who is willing to stand up to these leftist hacks in robes… to these judicial insurrectionist vermin.
It’s good vs evil time. There can be no compromise in this.
THIS!!
Calling judges “vermin” or “insurrectionists” for issuing rulings you disagree with is rhetoric better suited to authoritarian regimes than a constitutional republic.
Come on. Lincoln and Jackson faced real constitutional crises – but they also respected the need for legal legitimacy, even when navigating war or civil unrest.
Refer me to your posts when Schumer threatened the Supreme Court justices
This is no longer just a disagreement on rulings. This is now a real constitutional crisis even though you choose to ignore the reality.
You do not get more authoritarian than 132 open cases within two months, all challenging executive authority. In two months you have more open cases than the last 8 administrations combined., probably more. I’m too lazy to count, but it is unprecedented attack on our Constitution.
So you missed President Jackson’s famous retort to Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall: “Well, John Marshall has made his decision, but now let him enforce it.”
That’s kind of a biggy bit of history? Skipped your memory?
I think the only bar you ever passed were ones without a happy hour.
Address the nation would be very good.
Expand the net.
Publicize every Senator who voted for these judges. Run a campaign with graphic depictions/simulations of the crimes committed by the deportees side by side with self-serving commentary from these Senators vis rule of law, safety, accountability, etc. End the ads with some tag line that sticks: “Et tu Senator xxxxxx?”…..”Senator xxxxx you are responsible “…or some clever twist on a well known quote, hip hop phrase, etc.
Hit the offending Senators running for election in 2026 especially hard.
This is obviously pre-planned Lawfare activity laid down a long time ago.
Un-Earth the actual connections, meetings, etc., to fortify a conspiracy argument. Find (or turn) an insider willing to name names, dates, plans, etc.
This is now a war (actually has been for years) that must be fought on all fronts.
What we are watching is war between the liberal activist judiciary and President Donald Trump. If the president were anyone other than Donald Trump, this would not be happening. It is merely a continuation of what has been happening since Trump came on the political scene in 2015. The system sees Trump as a uniquely dangerous person, who intends to do what he says he will do. Don’t look for the chief justice to enter the war on the president’s side.
The activist judiciary was put in place! These actions are Plan B or C – or an integral element of the original plan disrupted by PDJT’s election.
Either way, it stinks to high heaven of conspiracy. Well, start pushing those threads.
Not lambasting you. We’re lined up in the same direction.
“I’ll gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today.”
It appears the judge is trying to get out of the spotlight he created for himself.
This is to whip up the left into a frenzy via the Sunday talk shows etc.
Someone gave Toastberg and his mates assurances and “clearance to run the interference”..
Amy Phony Beret’s glowing demon eyes like Gavin Rossdales character in “Constantine” and the uppity b!tch grimace she gave President Trump at the Inauguration and roberts about to cry set the scene we are witnessing now.
I have serious doubts we can overcome the issues plaguing this nation if we continue to engage the domestic enemies on their own playing field.
We were never going to vote our way out of it. The US will be a misery within most our lifetimes. And the saddest thing is it was facilitated by people who were willing to sell out their country for not much money in the scheme of things.
Did Judge Boasberg commit a federal crime with his initial order? He ordered the President to bring illegal aliens back to the US that the President had deported.
1907. Title 8, U.S.C. 1324(a) OffensesEncouraging/Inducing — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) makes it an offense for any person who — encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.
Conspiracy/Aiding or Abetting — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(v) expressly makes it an offense to engage in a conspiracy to commit or aid or abet the commission of the foregoing offenses.
Bringing Aliens to the United States — Subsection 1324(a)(2) makes it an offense for any person who — knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has not received prior authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, to bring to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever, such alien, regardless of any official action which may later be taken with respect to such alien.
YES! Thats the law!
CRUSH it now or forever deal with this and it.
NOW.
Dems KNOW how to do it; why don’t republicans, TrumP??????????
WHERE oh where is Patel and Bondi?????? On Fox, yet again??????
Seriously, I’m seeing major flaws, issues from the 1st 4Y??
Wouldn’t any details about a Cabinet-level discussion of state secrets be included in the state secrets? How and when and among whom aren’t details needed to be kept confidential as well?
Dear Mr. President,
Your description of Judge Not as a “local, unknown Judge” may not be quite accurate, with all due respect.
Judge Nuremburg was a FISA Court Judge sent by Chief Judas John Roberts to overthrow you and the People, before he assumed his duties as Deputy President of the United States. FISA, of course, stands for Foreign Intelligence Surveillance, with you being the Foreigner in question, naturally.
I hope this is helpful to your anointed mission under God, for America shall be saved, Hallelujah!
Let us pray:
Midweek Online – YouTube–-Pastor Tim Sheets, Oasis Church:
And all God’s People said Amen!
Rest in the Vine: Judge Beelzeberg is Acting as the Cartel’s Defense Counsel–
Just Like the USAID Dirty Money NGOs That His Daughter, Wife and Sister Run!
UPDATE: WE’VE BEEN AIMING TOO LOW; IT’S ROBERTS
I think “unknown judge” is his way of poking his ego.
“…. said the Elephant to the flea.
Hoping President Trump packs and sends several more loads of terrorists to El Salvador by then!
F this commie judge, arrest him for attempted overthrow of the POTUS, send in the navy seals and drag his off the bench and into jail. Has NO authority what so ever…..tell him to bring his army to the battlefield….it is time for WAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Epstein, the lot of them? What sort of banana republic is the USA? Case law means nothing, precedent means nothing, A black-robed supreme leader gets to say anything no matter how stupid and everybody should nod? It’s no different from the supreme council in Iran, Why is everybody that could stop this just standing around?
What we need is more sunlight on Boasberg and Roberts. What does the CIA have on Roberts? That needs to be made public.
President Trump hater Justice Roberts will not do anything to speed up the appeal process of these illegal Unconstitutional TROs!!! Lawfare’s efforts to tie up President Trump’s MAGA agenda in court for 4 years has the support of Justice Roberts! Roberts and his henchman Boasberg and others like him on the Federal courts are doing everything they can to protect the unelected deep state and maintain the status quo!!! Amazing how repugnant Justice Roberts and his henchman Boasberg find MAGA and transparency! Secret meetings and secret clubs aren’t just for the illuminati apparently!!! JMO Godspeed President Trump!
In reality, the SC is now untrustworthy and can’t be relied on to deliver any help.
Kavanaugh and ACB are just as likely to vote with libs as not and you can always count on Roberts for a defeat.
I had a comment at 6:15 if needed for my more detailed thoughts if anyone concerned with below I might be wishy washy. Please know Roberts and Barrett are the absolute lowest form of human debris. I would say even lower than this coup judge, Boasberg.
As much as we grind/grit our teeth (and Trump is doing it too), his comments on Truth and any that get to X/Twitter are his best path forward at this time. He does need to let this get thru the courts (hopefully “quickly”), his exposure of them is like sunlight on a vampire. They hate the exposure. And hopefully more people are learning what is really going on. And side note, lot of probable liberal Tesla owners are getting nicely redpilled. Musk is probably getting more redpilled by the hour.
And actually, Trump is going against Roberts whiny comment from a few days ago. He is ignoring Roberts. That’s good. Trump is holding his temper quite well.
He is probably boiling inside. He does know he needs to keep a lid on it if this is going to be resolved favorable.
I noted in my 6:15 comment that he is trying to thread a needle thru the Gordian Knot. I will add, and trying to do it with out touching/pricking any of the knot. As much as we (and probably he) want to go full nuclear on their ass, he is doing this the best way.
It will take the entirety of his administration for the courts to resolve it or at least the mid-terms. Mission accomplished by the left.
Maybe we “win” in a few years. That’s a loss.
In the era of unrestrained lawfare and judicial insurrection, the old “norms” don’t work anymore.
I forget who said this, but it summarizes things quite nicely.
“The beginning of wisdom is recognizing the world as it is, not as we wish it to be”
Why not take away his security clearance….then say sorry buddy it’s classified and you don’t have the clearance for that information”. and that would remove him from the fisa court as well…
It is past time to convene a hearing and subpoena communications between these maniacal judges. The House has the power to do so.
Trump is letting Roberts hang himself. The intel is coming out just how corrupt Roberts is and has been. Those in DC who thought they were above the law are going to what real law enforcement is all about. The surveillance state has been turned against them.
The 28th Amendment:
“I’m rubber, you’re glue, whatever you say bounces off of me and sticks to you.”
I have been frustrated for years that when a permanent judge position was before Congress, there would not be enough Republican senators present to question and fight their lifetime appointments. I hope they have learned a lesson.
Here is President Trumps Response.
President TrumpPresident TrumpPresident TrumpPresident Trumpnow what are you going to do Boso…
https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902750686145810716?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1902750686145810716%7Ctwgr%5E6fd780bec7bf274312f0b6f8139a37961254455c%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2025%2F03%2Frevealed-chief-justice-john-roberts-caught-secretive-invite%2F
REVEALED: Chief Justice John Roberts Caught in Secretive, Invite-Only Club for Elite Judges and Lawyers That Includes James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta and Ketanji Brown Jackson
https://home.innsofcourt.org/AIC/Get_Involved/AIC/AIC_Get_Involved/Get_Involved.aspx?hkey=49b0ec43-3059-4057-a1f7-28ded6f65527
Here’s the link on its public webpage in case you want to join, too.
HA!
Dear President Trump: Release the Epstein list now! Let Chief Justice Roberts prove his name isn’t the one on the list.
https://thefederalist.com/2025/03/21/rogue-judges-are-turning-judicial-review-into-judicial-rule/
-“This is the real authoritarianism creeping into the United States, not from the executive branch, but from a judiciary that no longer respects its own limits.”
As the Actual President said, Judge Botox has no business injecting himself into these matters.
“For their needed 2018 election effort,” LOL! How apt a Freudian “slip.”
Deleted.
Why is this not considered an overthrow of our Government when there is a co-ordinated effort, even if done by activist judges, to stop the President from doing his duty? Where are the voices and actions of all Republicans in the House and Senate. Even if they have no current action they can take they can make a constant mighty uproar until they figure out what they can do. The Republicans never fight fire with fire. There has to be something that can stop the judges who are taking over the President’s duties.
Someone.
If I can keep up with all the drama, I think the judge told the government they should’ve known he’d rule against them (on the TRO) because he set the hearing.
Isn’t a hearing supposed to be an opportunity for both sides to make their arguments to an unbiased Judge???
The govt should just say what shall you sanction the American people (the Government) since it’s clear you’ve already made up your mind.
You know, if someone were to take this POS by the scruff of his scrawny neck, drag him out to the street for all to see, beat the snot out of him, strip him down to his skivvies, then (pine)tar & feather him, then work him over until he gave up EVERYTHING and EVERYONE who’s either paying him or in conspiracy to do all this damage…
well then, I could go through a couple of bags of popcorn watching that.
and yes, I know, I know… it’s not the “christian” thing to do. But in response, stepping on a cockroach does not make one lowering to the level of the vermin.
Recourse?
Roberts and Barrett, compromised.
Congress, compromised.
They have broken their constitutional oath.
Military investigations??
There are Article II powers that the President can invoke to quickly neuter a dangerous judge such as this one.
I lay them out below.
This judge has breached the national security barrier, and is now interfering with core Constitutional Article II duties.
Man oh man, the troll ratio today has climbed from 3:1 to 10:1, troll:treepers,,,,,, they are very tiring
One Judge seems to have the ability to stop virtually anything he/she wishes. Well then, why not have one Judge put a stay order on ALL other Judges and demand them to explain how the Constitution is not being violated.
As I mentioned yesterday, this judge in particular is directly threatening national security matters. He has crossed a very red line.
The approach to a lawless, reckless ideologue posing as a judge, such as this, is easy and will be an effective deterrent for future judicial insurrectionists:
1 Ignore his orders, and declare them unauthorized per se upon their face, and an immediate national security threat.
2 Declare him a national security risk.
3 Declare and place him under FBI surveillance, as a national security risk.
4 Refer him to the House Judiciary Committee, under Articles of Impeachment, for full Congressional investigation and possible prosecution.
5 Make a public example of him to the others.
I think he should state that information pertaining to flights of illegal alien terrorists is classified at the highest levels to protect the safety of law enforcement and military personnel transporting dangerous terrorists.
Then tell Biasberg that the President of the United States has determined Biasberg lacks appropriate “need to know” which is a necessary condition for obtaining that information.
Furthermore, remind the judge that people who repeatedly request classified information for which they do not have a validated need to know are generally at risk of losing their clearance because it is a red flag for espionage.
“Further requests may lead to criminal investigation into your role interfering with a national security action including aiding and abetting criminal terrorists’ attempts to evade US law.”
Put the judge in his place. Impeachment is not a risk. Give the judge more rope to hang himself.
Work with Congress to subpoena the judge to appear before both Judiciary committees.
I wonder if the nationwide injunction could give standing to another venue where a case could be brought against the original court because the effect of that nationwide injunction harmed people in the new district. Then another district court could issues a nationwide injunction against the original. Thereby setting up what we could call “injunction Junction”…… 😎
Seriously which nationwide injunction would take precedent?
A way to circumvent Roberts. 🤔
😁
Aside from that, what happened to the Executive Order he signed saying that he was going to ignore all of these unconstitutional judicial orders absent any ruling by SCOTUS? That was the correct stand to take. What happened to it?
There’s no such EO.
I remember the one from the White House site that says before an injunction is filed, the plaintiffs have to put up enough MONEY that would cover the government’s expenses and costs in the event that the plaintiffs DO NOT WIN!
Do you have any IDEA how much money that would be on something like ordering 5000 FORMER EMPLOYEES BE REHIRED???
In my opinion, that would put an end to it right there….
Yet, I never heard anymore about it.
Perhaps it was something regarding a Civil vs. Non-Civil lawsuit….
I believe the information is classified and part of this Nations Security. As Commander in Chief, President Trump is the highest authority when it comes to National Security and the protection of this Country’s citizens.
Boasberg has proven that he cannot be trusted not to release this Classified and Confidential information that pertains to National Security. Julie Kelly shows that he wrote in his General Summary “Classified Information”. If his daughter works to provide legal counsel to these very same Tren D Aragua gang members, how do we know he will not provide her with information? Essentially he just released information he said would remain sealed.
Julie Kelly on X
Boasberg now thinks he’s entitled to obviously privileged information related to discussions over fighting his order on Venezuelan terror flights. Insane.
Julie Kelly on X
Boasberg disclosing general summary of sealed proceedings about flight information once again proving why he cannot be trusted with this information. He also promised in previous order he would keep sealed hearing, documents under wraps.
Yes. At very least, drag it out without allowing for allegation of contempt. A kind of rope a dope strategy. Don’t take the bait. The deep state and bureaucracy will still be dismantled, just not as fast as we want.
There will be reprocessing. People can’t help to see behind the nonsense. As usual, these wankers have outkicked their coverage. Bringing in the MP’s to remove them?….All of them? They are obviously looking to impeach PDJT for the 345th time.. Regardless, this insurrection will not end end well.
Bingo! At some point going on offense and stepping on the gas is the way to go. Here’s a little secret most people don’t understand about human nature. In order to have a society based on the rule of law, prosperity and safety after decades of neglect. YOU HAVE to be authoritarian to break the mold. Otherwise, you’ll never accomplish the goal. The intent is what counts. Trump should cede NOTHING to these Judges. If anything, make them aware that THEY are the ones with hell to pay if they overstep.
Revoke the judge’s security clearance, if he has one, classify all the info, and tell the cockmonkey to pound sand.
Seems to work for the deep state – silos and all. Flip the script!
I think we should set the judge up. There are regulations stating you have to have a need to know. People with clearances are trained to throw red flags if someone keeps asking for information after they have been informed they don’t have a need to know.
The President determines this. Let the judge keep asking and when the press asks tell them he’s been informed he doesn’t have a need to know. We shared what we could. Besides, he had no authority to issue the order to begin with. So when the flight left doesn’t matter.
I think this judge has already set himself up. In his cloistered hubris, he crossed a clear Article II redline.
This Congress, of Johnson and Thune, are not going to impeach the judge. But they’re not going to interfere with PDJT’s Article II response, either.
They will sit on their Article I hands and watch, for the key reason that follows.
PDJT is as politically powerful as he has ever been at this point. He is a political godzilla.
His core Article II powers are not going to be interfered with by Congress for purely political reasons.
And certainly not in protecting the Nation from an out of control inferior judicial officer that is knowingly threatening national security.
So he should unleash his full Article II powers on this rogue judge. Right now, without delay. To protect the Executive from an out of control judiciary.
Declare this judge and his unauthorized orders a national security risk. And then proceed accordingly.
This weak Congress will then likely pile on. And the example will have been made.
Most judges are lazy, cowardly bullies. And they will run away screaming once faced with true Constitutional blowback for their excesses.
This President wants to roll back 130 years of legislative and treaty excesses. He might as well roll back the historical judicial excesses as well.
The entire system has suffered systemic corruption. It’s going to have to be addressed eventually, if not by Congress than by the Executive.
Article III never gave the courts this much power, to threaten the Executive itself, as it now does.
Do it now, Mr. President, when you have the ability to do so. Pull the trigger. Make the declarations. Unleash the national security powers upon him.
Set the example.
CONgress is an integral part of the swamp, and is NOT going to intervene, on behalf if the Administration.
So, forget about any help from that quarter, and forget about any help from SCOTUS.
Just so….which leaves us with….? Martial law? This is going to reach critical mass.
This Congress is not going to intervene to protect this inferior judiciary, either.
It’s a weak Congress. They can’t even assemble a Budget.
I love PDJT. But this President needs to take his gloves off. And haul this out of line judge to the National Security woodshed.
The Congress will watch, and then join in on the Constitutional whooping once PDJT starts it.
And then, most importantly of all, the example will be set.