Judge James Boasberg issues a three-page order [SEE HERE] demanding the Trump administration deliver cabinet level details about their criminal alien deportation operation.
Boasberg claims the information provided to him so far is “woefully inadequate,” and lacks the citations of what cabinet-level officials were involved in deporting criminal illegal aliens and Tren de Aragua gang members protected by a leftist immigration organization employing Judge Boasberg’s daughter.
Judge Boasberg appears to be focused on generating a contempt order against the Trump administration. Presumably, this would give Boasberg’s allied Democrats in congress a foothold for their needed 2018 election effort and another impeachment attempt.
“To begin, the Government cannot proffer a regional ICE official to attest to Cabinet-level discussions of the state-secrets privilege; indeed, his declaration on that point, not surprisingly, is based solely on his unsubstantiated ‘understand[ing],'” he said.
Boasberg then ordered the Trump administration to submit a brief by March 25 explaining why it did not violate his order by failing to return the individuals in question on the two earliest planes that arrived from El Salvador to the U.S. on March 15.
“By March 21, 2025, at 10:00 a.m., Defendants shall submit a sworn declaration by a person with direct involvement in the Cabinet-level discussions regarding invocation of the state-secrets privilege,” he added.
[SOURCE]
Boasberg had previously warned the Trump administration of consequences if it were to violate his order.
President Trump via Truth Social:
“Unlawful Nationwide Injunctions by Radical Left Judges could very well lead to the destruction of our Country! These people are Lunatics, who do not care, even a little bit, about the repercussions from their very dangerous and incorrect Decisions and Rulings.
Lawyers endlessly search the United States for these Judges, and file lawsuits as quickly as they find them. It is then the obligation of Law abiding Agencies of Government to have these “Orders” overturned. The danger is unparalleled! These Judges want to assume the Powers of the Presidency, without having to attain 80 Million Votes. They want all of the advantages with none of the risks.
Again, a President has to be allowed to act quickly and decisively about such matters as returning murderers, drug lords, rapists, and other such type criminals back to their Homeland, or to other locations that will allow our Country to be SAFE. It is our goal to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, and such a high aspiration can never be done if Radical and Highly Partisan Judges are allowed to stand in the way of JUSTICE. STOP NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS NOW, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.
If Justice Roberts and the United States Supreme Court do not fix this toxic and unprecedented situation IMMEDIATELY, our Country is in very serious trouble!”
The President is being maneuvered into once again doing what Presidents Jackson and Lincoln (he on your $5 bill …) had to do. Namely, to Constitutionally and on his own(!) Constitutional authority declare these “orders” and “rulings” to be “Unconstitutional.” And therefore of no legal force or effect.
Which is NOT a “radical” statement – it is entirely true. The Constitution did not give “Article 3” review-and-consent powers over either of the other two. Furthermore, it is not necessary to “pray that the SCOTUS” agree with that statement. (“Give consent.”)
So, if you intend to force a confrontation over the powers and prerogatives of “the Presidency,” here it is.
If you want to AMEND the Constitution to implement “rule by non-elected ‘privy council,’” you are welcome to try …
The overall design of the Constitution is equally important for what it does NOT say. As its authors separately wrote at the time, “this was purposeful.” e.g. the Jefferson quote just below …
The President has ready Article II powers and remedies that I lay out above in this thread.
The exercise of those powers would have an instant deterrent effect on the entire rogue judiciary, by making an example out of this one.
This renegade judge has made it particularly easy, having broken the national security barrier, directly threatening the President’s core Article II duties.
@Oldersoul: I think that it is largely that, since Wilson/FDR, and maybe even since “Marbury,” they were never seriously confronted. They simply “did it,” and became entirely accustomed to doing it “with impunity.” Even though the Constitution never granted them that power, nor that “royal,” despotic role.
But they didn’t try to “do it” 200+ times simultaneously. Until now. Now, you can’t look the other way. If the SCOTUS will not timely stop this, graciously and decisively, then the President himself must. As he is(!) authorized to do.
In Washington’s day, judges such as this would have likely been quickly rounded up, tried as seditionists against the Republic, and then hanged.
Lincoln was a little more tame about it, and tended to just ignore them.
1 reason, among many, not to teach Constitution history.
A single word, they most want hidden :
SEDITION.
They certainly do not want that play on Broadway winning all awards & earning Longest Running play status.
To prove your point further, Ludecke v. Watkins held specifically that this Aliens Enemies Act is not up for Judicial review. Period. They are trying to say we are not at war. However the Alien Enemies Act says, “any invasion or predatory incursion”.
Boasberg is breaking his oath of office to “uphold the Constitution”.
“or any invasion or predatory incursion is perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States by any foreign nation or government, and the President makes public proclamation of the event, all natives, citizens”
Ludecke v. Watkins, 335 U.S. 160 (1948)
Under authority of the Alien Enemy Act of 1798, which empowers the President, whenever there is a “declared war” between the United States and any foreign country, to provide for the removal of alien enemies from the United States, the President, on July 14, 1945, directed the removal of all alien enemies “deemed by the Attorney General to be dangerous” to the public safety. The Attorney General, on January 18, 1946, ordered removal of petitioner, a German national, from the United States. Challenging the validity of the removal order, petitioner instituted habeas corpus proceedings in the Federal District Court to secure his release from detention under the order.
Held:
1. The Alien Enemy Act precludes judicial review of the removal order. Pp. 335 U. S. 163-166.
*******
If the Alien Enemy Act precludes (prevents) judicial review of the removal order then HOW and WHY does this judge think he has any authority to prevent anything, much less review the flight logs.
Just curious. Congress is the only entity that can declare war. How does this jive with the Alien Enemy Act definition of same?
Here’s the logic:
IF there is a declared war between the United States and any foreign nation OR
IF or any invasion or predatory incursion is perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States by any foreign nation or government,
AND
IF the President makes public proclamation of the event
THEN
All natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of the hostile nation or government, being of the age of fourteen years and upward, who shall be within the United States and not actually naturalized, shall be liable to be apprehended, restrained, secured, and removed as alien enemies.
What can a President do if those conditional statements are all true?
“The President is authorized in any such event, by his proclamation thereof, or other public act, to direct the conduct to be observed on the part of the United States, toward the aliens who become so liable; the manner and degree of the restraint to which they shall be subject and in what cases, and upon what security their residence shall be permitted, and to provide for the removal of those who, not being permitted to reside within the United States, refuse or neglect to depart therefrom; and to establish any other regulations which are found necessary in the premises and for the public safety.”
Everything directly quoted from the statute itself, see the link below, is the JURISDICTION of the PRESIDENT in all such matters regarding the Alien Enemies Act:
50 U.S. Code § 21 – Restraint, regulation, and removal | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
Everything in the next link below constitutes the jurisdiction of any district judge presiding over such cases:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/23
He is duty bound to uphold Supreme Court precedent.
Section 23 of the statute sets forth Boasberg’s jurisdiction. It does not include any of the things you mentioned. The President’s Proclamation and any related regulations are the “guardrails” for the judges, not the judge’s opinions the “guardrails” for the President.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/23
100% – nor does it give Inferior Art 1 courts – where this bullshit is all originating – any authority over the Executive executing Executive powers assigned by the Constitution and as such are not subject to interference.
Accuse Boasberg of being a co-conspirator at the epicenter of a metastasizing judicial coup—part of a ten years long seditious plot to deprive both the President of his article II powers and the civil rights of his public supporters—vis-a-vis his presiding over the FISA Court during Russia-Gate. In no way can he be a fair arbiter of any action against the President. And at this point, neither can the Chief Justice of the United States.
Open a National Security Investigation to investigate a coordinated judicial coup of the Executive Branch.
Article 2 is crystal clear.
You are on the right track.
But the President has much more immediate and unilateral power than that under Article II.
This judge’s lawless orders are a threat to national security matters.
The President has exclusive power to declare national security threats, and this judge a National Security Risk, with all that implies.
The President can do that — right now — and much more. See, upthread for the details.
Absolutely. There have been 132 injunctions leveled at President Trumps’s agenda to Make America Great Again. This is more than ALL US Presidents in history combined.
Now we lean that judges do indeed hold secret meetings in an invite only club. SCOTUS “Chief” Justice John Roberts is part of this club. Some keep saying this no big deal and TGP is using sensational headlines. These Judicial attacks appear to be coordinated so I think this is a big deal. Remember, Blue state AGs admitted they were “coordinating” to “Get Trump. They lost the election, but are now trying to run the country from the bench.
“REVEALED: Chief Justice John Roberts Caught in Secretive, Invite-Only Club of Elite Judges and Lawyers That Includes James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta and Ketanji Brown Jackson”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/revealed-chief-justice-john-roberts-caught-secretive-invite/
In that article is a notation that Soros is involved with some funding of this group if I am not mistaken..
RICO
“132 injunctions against ‘We the People’.” IMHO.
Refuse to comply…what’re gonna do, Bo-ass-berg?! Write harder?
I find it hard to believe the hard thinking founding fathers left no recourse to eliminate rogue judges. Or maybe we did something wrong in allowing their powers to be so broad in subsequent years. Although they did a bang-up job in the post-Civil War period, I am thinking Roberts needs to be removed since he is privy to Star Chamber doings. Since when do we adhere to British jurisprudence, so-called? I’m saying legal voting trumps everything in this country. We have the last say so.
Well, we did expand the number of judges, districts, etc. exponentially, some of which was warranted by the growth of the country. There are some jurisdictions, though, which should be eliminated–D.C. being the prime example. It should not exist. Congress created it; Congress can abolish it.
They did leave recourse to eliminate rogue judges. It’s up to Congress to get these judges under control. They are not doing their jobs.
Newt Gingrich gives advice as to what Congress can do.
“An Intolerable Judicial Dictatorship”
https://gingrich360.com/2025/03/18/an-intolerable-judicial-dictatorship/
Governor Desantis gives advice on what Congress can do.
“Ron DeSantis Proposes Solution to Stop the ‘Sabotaging of President Trump’s Agenda’ by Federal Judges”
https://www.westernjournal.com/ron-desantis-proposes-solution-stop-sabotaging-president-trumps-agenda-federal-judges/
“When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for a people…:
necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands
which have connected them with another, and to assume
among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal
station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God
entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind
requires that they should declare the causes which impel
them to the separation….” brainy quote.
“a decent respect to the opinions of mankind….”
Judges are not above the law.
They are Federal employees, and as such, are subject to the Justice Dept {AG Bondi} of the Executive branch of the US Government.
POTUS is not above the law, but is the only person {non Christian} on Earth who is legally not under the law either.
In God We Trust
Trust God
Fear not
Judges are not employees of the Executive Branch. They’re part of the Judiciary – which was deliberately created by the Constitution to be independent from the president and the DOJ. That independence is essential to prevent exactly what you’re suggesting: a president or attorney general using the justice system to punish judges for issuing rulings they don’t like.
EDIT: Regarding not being “under the law”, U.S. versus Nixon would like to have a word with you.
My fear is that Bondi isn’t up to the task she needs to handle…
Inferior courts are created by Congress. While their powers are Judicial (Article 3). Nowhere are they now granted the powers that they now seek to dictate terms to Congress and to the Executive. They literally just “assumed” them. And now we see why Article 3 WASN’T written that way.
Correct.
But the President doesn’t need the Legislature to deal with district judges who cross the National Security barrier.
He can deal with them directly under Article II, as declared National Security threats.
The Congress can just sit around and watch. This Congress will not interfere with PDJT if he does so.
United States v. Nixon is bad law. From the era of the CIA takeover and bureaucratic rebellion and their attack on the Executive.
Anyone can be declared a National Security Threat under Article II. That power rests entirely in the Executive, and applies to all persons. Even judges.
This judge, and his orders, are now a threat to national security matters.
All the President has to do is declare it. All the rest of the Article II powers and remedies then apply.
This Legislature is not going to stop him from reining in the inferior judiciary.
Dismissing United States v. Nixon as “bad law” doesn’t erase its legal standing. It was a unanimous Supreme Court ruling, including Nixon’s own appointees, and it affirmed a critical principle that not even the President is above the law.
The idea that a president can unilaterally declare anyone, including federal judges, a “national security threat” and then bypass all oversight is the stuff of banana republics, not constitutional republics. Article II grants significant authority, yes – but it’s bounded by Articles I and III. That’s the genius of our system: three co-equal branches, not one imperial executive.
Sorry for you, but the Executive can do exactly that.
This judge is a national security threat.
And this Congress is not going to step in to save such a judge. They will rest on their Article I laurels.
We have an out of control judicial branch.
Too bad the Brazilians did what you wanted, and now have a real banana republic, ruled by a judge-tyrant.
Actually, what you’re proposing would turn the U.S. into the banana republic you claim to oppose.
Not at all. It would return the Republic to its pre-1913 roots.
And the judiciary would be pushed back into its historical Article III playpen. Where it belongs.
If the Legislature has a problem with it, they can proceed under Article I. They won’t.
So it comes down to a fist fight between a bully judiciary, and the Executive.
ZZzzzz…..
He’s a district judge playing outside of his jurisdiction. He has no authority to overrule national Executive decisions.
What would you say about the unprecedented number of open cases(132) right now attacking the executive branch? More than all the other administrations in this century?
Is this not the stuff of banana republics?
This is not three co-equal branches. The Supreme Court is, but not what we are witnessing.
I believe the Old soul is correct in his understanding of the Constitution. The President has the duty to protect and defend the Constitution, not decisions of the Supreme Court which can be wrong (Roe v Wade). In matters of national security, the President is the unitary authority!
Praise GOD!!! Fight! Fight! Fight!
WRONG!
POTUS has plenary authority to declare threats to national security, and can revoke security clearance of ANYONE if he deems it necessary.
Yes, the President is not “Above the Law” There is a sole remedy, and that is impeachement. PERIOD.
You’re an attorney? 🙄
Young attorneys, and government attorneys, tend to be excessively deferential to judges.
Older and retired attorneys have seen enough to know that many do not deserve that deference.
And the respect is owed to the institution, and not its temporary officeholders.
Many of whom are laden with flaws and faults and lack judicial temperament and restraint. More so in recent years!
If judges were all so infallible and personally faultless, we would not have appellate panels.
That is because it is the Legislature’s job to punish these judges for bad behavior, not just because of their rulings.
Judges and lawyers owe a fidelity to both the spirit of the law as well as the rule of law. These judges and lawyers associated with lawfare having never shown fidelity to the spirit of the law. They should be gone for bad behavior plain and simple.
The President has an express duty under the Constitution to protect his Executive branch, and by extension the Constitution.
And if the Legislature will not awaken to that same defense, by reigning in a seditious and unrestrained Judiciary, then the Executive must.
It is all lined up perfectly now. Set aside your modern media conditioning of contemporary deference.
And proceed as the Founders would have.
“You seem to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so. They have, with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps…. Their power [is] the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves.”― Thomas Jefferson
Yes. There is no point in having officers swear allegiance to a moving target. If presidents, legislators and soldiers are required to take an oath to the Constitution, that means it has a fixed meaning that can be deduced by the oath-taker, not by judges alone.
All branches were created Co-equal to protect the Sovereign Right of the People
“Boasberg then ordered the Trump administration to submit a brief by March 25 explaining why it did not violate his order by failing to return the individuals in question….”
Isn’t that like being asked to prove a negative?
“Mr President, when did you stop beating your wife”
Conflicts of interest, private clubs, progressive agendas… Stench from the bench.
There have already been at least 2 WORKABLE solutions offered that involve CONGRESSIONAL ACTION!!
1 came from a CTH reader & another proposed by Mark Levin. NEITHER SOLUTION INVOLVES IMPEACHMENT!!
Roberts is himself corrupt, so even the Supremes cannot be counted on here.
C’mon Congress!! Stop cowering behind your orifice doors & get the process rolling here!!
Note to Sundance- It could be beneficial to have a special thread with the 2 suggestions (As I recall, 1 of the solutions involves defunding of judicial staffs, the other involved removal of jurisdiction from these rogue courts- Like pulling the carpet out from under them).
I have never been so utterly disgusted with Congress as a whole with both their silence & inaction. Impeachment papers are nice, but not enough!!
Impeachment is not required here, but would be one element downstream from more immediate remedies the President can take.
This judge has threatened national security matters by his orders.
Those remedies can be swift and unilateral by the Executive under Article II.
See upthread.
Must be swift and unilaterally exercising Presidential authority.
Good grief. Is the House even in session? House Republicans can’t even produce a budget. Their committees looking into matters go nowhere. The SCROTUS is not out friend and neither is “No Johnson” Johnson and his merry bunch of incompetents. Time for PDJT to channel Andrew Jackson, and to start paying attention to 2026. He cannot lose the House.
The urgency for SCOTUS to act is real for there could be a reaction by the people against these specious orders from Lawfare judges.
Blah, blah, blah…Bondi
So DO something about it! Take it to SCOTUS.
Oh, wait, you can’t because in a recent ruling related to a district court obstructing Trump, the NOT constitutionally conservative Roberts about which virtually nothing was known about his ideology when nominated by son of a CIA daddy Bush Jr. and when RINOs fooled Trump v1.0 to nominate Barrett primarily as a PC move because of her reproductive plumbing, both voted with the left in a decision that the dissenters called “stunning” because they didn’t very simply and correctly rule that the DISTRICT court was out of its realm of control.
See how very clever The Blob/Deep State is? They play the LONG game to make sure that even if a boat rocker POTUS is elected they can simply obstruct him by having “conservatives” that AREN’T appointed to the SCOTUS while loading the district courts with their leftist allies.
Bondi isn’t even doing what is suggested by Karl Denninger below.
US Attorney General Says District Judge Has ‘No Right’ To Ask Flight Deportation Questions
Mar 20, 2025
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/us-attorney-general-says-district-judge-has-no-right-ask-flight-deportation-questions
U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi said that a federal judge who blocked the Trump administration from invoking the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to remove illegal immigrants has “no right” to ask questions on flights carrying deported individuals.
Bondi told Fox News on Wednesday that such questions are inappropriate and that the judge has “no right” to ask those questions and “no power” to order the government to return those flights back to the United States, adding that she believes “liberal” judges are issuing orders on matters they have no jurisdiction over.
“They’re meddling in foreign affairs. They’re meddling in our government,” she told the outlet. “And the question should be, why is a judge trying to protect terrorists who have invaded our country over American citizens?”
So Where Are The Filings?
Karl Denninger
8 Mar 2025
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=252937
Trump’s Administration has finally taken notice of Rule 65(c) when it comes to Federal Courts:
(c) Security. The court may issue a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order only if the movant gives security in an amount that the court considers proper to pay the costs and damages sustained by any party found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained. The United States, its officers, and its agencies are not required to give security.
This is not discretionary and the court cannot assess a “de-minimus” security amount either; it must be defensible predicated on the costs and damages that the other party may or will suffer with the evidence of same in the order itself if the injunction or TRO issues until disposition of the case and the posting of said security has to be completed before the TRO or injunction is valid.
[snip]
Thus where is Pam Bondi with immediate emergency filings against all of the existing injunctions already issued demanding that security be posted up and computed in said public filing and, if there is any delay or refusal by the judges involved to do so taking an immediate emergency appeal as far as necessary including to the Supreme Court which, given the actual language in the Rules of Civil Procedure is a slam-dunk and immediate win? No, demanding this only on a forward basis for future filings is not enough — force the movants in all the existing injunctions to either post up security or dissolve the injunctions and TROs.
Challenging those district court overreaches takes forever and their actions don’t fit the requirements for impeachment:
Impeachment of judges is a process where federal judges can be removed from office for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” as outlined in the U.S. Constitution. The House of Representatives can impeach a judge with a majority vote, but a two-thirds majority in the Senate is required for conviction and removal, making it a rare occurrence.
Impeachments are nothing better than strongly worded letters without removal which will never happen.
Show sessions in CONgress are also useless since so many in our easily propagandized, attention deficit, political idiocracy which recently lost to Trump by less than 2% of the popular vote either isn’t paying even remotely enough attention OR SUPPORTS what is going on.
Back in 2015, I Wrote, “Is Supreme Court Justice John Roberts Being Blackmailed?” This Question is as Valid Today as a Decade Ago
By Wayne Allyn Root
20 Mar 2025
https://inlandnwreport.com/2025/03/20/back-in-2015-i-wrote-is-supreme-court-justice-john-roberts-being-blackmailed-this-question-is-as-valid-today-as-a-decade-ago/
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Wayne Allyn Root is a CEO, businessman, best-selling author, and national conservative TV and radio host who has interviewed President Trump 16 times. Watch Wayne’s TV show “America’s Top Ten Countdown” on Real America’s Voice TV at Noon ET on Saturdays and his video podcast “Wayne Allyn Root: Raw & Unfiltered” at Untamed Nation.com and Rumble.com daily from 6 PM to 8 PM ET daily. His web site is ROOTforAmerica.com. Read Wayne’s latest fun book, “How Democrats Have Made America Great.” It’s 140 blank pages. The joke is on Democrats!
The President is empowered by “Article 2 itself.” He does not hold these powers “at the pleasure of the SCOTUS,” let alone inferior courts.
Instead, he (alone!) is specifically tasked to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” And to perform every diplomatic function. And to be Commander in Chief. “THE Executive power.”
The text of the Constitution does not contain the word, “Unconstitutional.”
Well then, the solution should be simple and it is SO obvious that this should be SO easy to nip in the bud… even without the SCOTUS…which, as I have pointed out, CANNOT be trusted.
Dream on… if it was as simple as that it would have already been done.
No. I think this President is just exercising excessive executive restraint, and is being overly deferential to a judiciary that has abandoned all judicial restraint.
The President has to take the gloves off here. And protect his Branch. This Congress is not going to step in for him, or the judge.
Absolutely right Mike!! My apologies for not reading the whole thread before posting .
Praise GOD!!! Fight! Fight! Fight!
All the discussions below in the comment section by legal experts or lawyers with expertise are suggesting that the The Alien Enemies Act of 1798 is subject to judicial review under certain conditions. However, all the conditions mentioned here and on Jason Gordan’s X post here:
https://x.com/jasongordo626/status/1902559100740751752
that suggest it can be reviewed are situations that apply to US Citizens who have rights such as due process. Aliens have no Constitutional rights. This is probably why the Act was created to be non-justiciable in the first place.
Aliens have no Constitutional rights.
It has not been sufficiently appreciated that perhaps the greatest “Constitutional Crisis” (before today) was Dred Scott vs. Sandford known also as The Dred Scott Decision, which was overturned not by a later Supreme Court decision, but by The Civil War, and then a reversal was effected by the 13th and 14th Amendments.
I suspect that we will not have a Civil War over Boasberg and his Mafia Mudges, but the Communists, with their paid vandals and rioters, think they could handle one!
I suspect that they would lose a real civil war!
“Judge Biasberg,
Our committees are deeply concerned about the role you, as a Federal district judge, are attempting to seize from Congress and the Executive Branch pertaining to the lawful deportation of criminal aliens designated as terrorists by the President. As this committee weighs legislating limiting the size and jurisdiction of inferior courts, we require your testimony on such and such date and time to understand your legal justifications. We are also concerned about your ties to plaintiff, your potential familial conflicts of interest in matters pertaining to deportations, and your involvement in past Lawfare efforts to ensnare President Trump in impeachment traps using similar tactics as you have displayed in recent days. We require any and all documents, emails, text messages, and other communications from your court including yourself and all employees of the court relevant to the ongoing litigation. Noncompliance may be considered contempt of Congress which is an impeachable offense.”
– Jim Jordan, Chairman, House Judiciary
– Charles Grassley, Chairman, Senate Judiciary
Write a Letter Maria !
Need a little less talk and a lot more action.
Anyone else hear music while reading this stuff ?
Biasberg! LOL!
This is Democrat lawfare (sanctioned by John Robert’s in action on the matter) designed to get Trump to defy these court orders and for the Dimocrats in Congress to gin up yet another impeachment. We’ve seen this movie before and it doesn’t end well for the Dims.
Impeachment is not much of a threat for Trump and they know it. This specific issue of deporting criminal alien terrorists is a 50,000 volt wire just waiting for Democrats to grab ahead of the midterms.
The American people overwhelmingly elected Trump despite two failed impeachments, four indictments, and countless civil cases. This is a sure loser for them and they know it.
And the judges are on the cusp of finding out that The People, through our elected Representatives, are in charge of this country not the courts.
Biasberg is giving Congress and the President all the justification they need to start gutting the judiciary.
Judicial Insurrection.
Act accordingly.
Don’t waste time on impeachment talk, no democrat senator will vote for conviction.
If there are no consequences for “bad” behavior, then that behavior will continue.
Impeachment of Trump is a sure loser. Democrats are currently trying to figure out how to triangulate themselves into winning as MAGA in 2026.
Impeachment of judges is not off the table, but you need a hook. In this case, Congress needs to subpoena Biasberg. If he refuses, that’s “contempt of Congress” which IS an impeachable offense.
That shouldn’t be the goal, though. The goal should be to drag Biasberg off his throne, bring him into the Peoples’ House, and shine sunlight on that vampire.
Then do the same to other judges.
Then Congress should eliminate 200-300 Federal district judges as a start. (There are 700.)
It’s time for Congress to DOGE the third and lowest branch of government.
The Gateway Pundit has published article about our judiciary, our courts including SCOTUS, that might explain why its all so corrupt and organized against our nation and all things Trump, MAGA and our Republic as defined by our Founding Fathers. Excellent article, please read. Titled – ‘Chief Justice Roberts Caught in Secretive, Invite-Only Club of Elite Judges and Lawyers That Includes James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta and Ketanji Brown Jackson’
It’s long but well worth the read.
If it’s the American Inns of Court, it’s a group that’s been around a long time, has a public webpage, and even a drop down menu where you can find an application to join.
https://home.innsofcourt.org/
judge are NOT above The Law,
investigate a coordinated judicial Radical coup of The Executive Branch,
The problem we might run into is that DOJ needs a judge to issue subpoenas for said investigation. Even reliably Republican judges will lock shields to protect their own.
This needs to go to Congress and Congress can refer charges to DOJ. That punctures the “separation of powers” arguments because Congress controls the inferior courts.
But more importantly, Congress can use the hearings to justify legislation decreasing the size and jurisdiction of the Federal District Court system. And the appellates.
This is a DOGE exercise. Trump is eliminating the #resistance by decapitating the bureaucracy and eliminating their shock troops.
Congress can and must do this for the courts. They’re going to cement DOGE in the FY26 budget. Perfect timing.
Watch how fast SCOTUS shuts these down when faced with the prospect of losing 1/3 or more of the district courts and forcing SCOTUS to hear more cases directly.
I am literally listening to the Tara show, a radio program at the freq 98.9 fm in the SC Upstate. She is describing both Tren de Aragua and the lawlessness of the leftist judges.
The root problem is that the Republicans in Capital Hill will not curb the lawless judges who are destroying the Constitution. They HAVE the power to do it given to them by the Constitution!
Let me tell you about TdA, who the Republicans and the lawless judges love. TdA works closely with Hezbollah. They have very close ties with Iran.
It took an army to dislodge TdA from an occupied hotel in El Paso. Literally, an army.
TdA kidnaps children and woman and force them into prostitution in El Paso, TX. TdA kills political opponents in Venezuela. The demoncrats, who are silently supported by “republicans”, want to have same murderous muscle to retain political power here. That is why they pressured Maduro to send them here. Madurai was pressured by Americans, our guys.
And, as I am listening to the radio which has periodical news between the Tara show segments, the news blatantly are lying. The judge has no jurisdiction over Trump. The lower courts are limited to their own judicial districts and not the nation. THEY ARE LYING!!!!
It is all lies. The judges are literally Hezbollah allies. The republican supports kidnapping children, addict them and o drugs, and rape them for profit by not stopping the judges.
THIS MUST END!!!!!
Call your representatives and tell them to stop this judges. They have the power!!!
Tara is on fire this morning.
For those beyond the range of the 98.8FM “blowtorch” broadcasting from high upon Hogback Mountain, she can be found on Rumble.
https://rumble.com/v6qz8s0-gop-leaders-secretly-let-lib-judges-terrorize-trump.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
Good move! Here’s another link, the one I use.
https://www.audacy.com/stations/989word#
Boasberg is doing his best to replicate Alexandre de Moraes here in the US. Both are nothing more than evil pond scum.
People should understand that Bondi and Patel will not side with Trump over judges. They will protect the institutions and D.C. they will back congressional impeachment. They will turn on Trump if he ignores the judges.
Congress is 99% D.C. uniparty. those holding power are 100% uniparty and would love to impeach Trump. They’re just waiting for an excuse.
Fine line to walk. Pull the security clearances from activist judges and let them know the information is national security. Don’t play their game, make them play the executive game where they can’t win. Use the military to deport illegals as a national security threat.
So Joe can fly them in with no concern but Trump can’t fly them out because this judge has concerns for the illegal gang members with loving tattoos.
This is insane!
Isn’t what Boasberg is doing the job of the prosecutor?
Asking for a friend.
where are the republicans?
Hello?
Are you there?
and what about the other unlawful stoppage of President Trump’s orders?
UniParty is assisting in the disenfranchisement of President Trump voters once again.
UniParty is where they are.
The President is the Commander-in-Chief. He does not answer to some pissant like Boasberg.
Could the President have this pissant arrested and tried in a military court? Because the judge is attempting to subvert the role of the Commander-in-Chief, which he is very clearly not empowered to do. It sounds like sedition to me.
Because they know some district court judge will find a way to block that too.
Kinda being sarcastic, but not really.
Apparently Trump has to have some paperwork filed with the Secret Service to end protection. I assume that’s in the works.
It looks as if grifter Hunter married an opportunistic gold digger who just realized she’s married to a bankrupt, former crack addict with no job skills or qualifications other than an inactive law license.
She may have to move in with her in-laws in suburban Wilmington. There’s plenty of room. It even has a ballroom that could be renovated into a nice little efficiency for Hunter and family.
Newt Gingrich has weighed in on the judiciary overreach. I don’t particularly like the guy but his ideas regarding what Congress can do, warrant attention.
“An Intolerable Judicial Dictatorship”
Excerpts:
The Federalists tried to strengthen their grip on the judicial system after losing the election of 1800. They created a wave of new judges which were pejoratively called “midnight judges.” The move was hated by the Jeffersonians. Anyone who is curious about how an angered Congress and President can remind the judiciary of its limits should read the Judiciary Act of 1802. The Jeffersonians repudiated the Federalist efforts to stack the judgeships.
In this tradition, the House and Senate should launch two parallel sets of hearings.
First, they should bring in historians and legal experts to walk the Congress and the country through the views of the founding fathers – and how they would have dealt with runaway judges.
Second, the House and Senate Judiciary Committees should bring in the most overreaching district judges and demand that they explain their reasoning.
Minor federal judges cannot be allowed to override the President and the Congress. We have a Supreme Court for a reason.
Lower court judges must operate within the framework of the Constitution. They are not superior to the two elected branches.
There are a variety of remedies available to correct this problem. Congress should explore them all.
https://gingrich360.com/2025/03/18/an-intolerable-judicial-dictatorship/
Im sure the judge is aware of this:
https://joehoft.com/supreme-court-ruled-on-alien-enemy-act-in-1948-corrupt-obama-judge-boasbergs-order-is-unconstitutional/
So what’s going on?
Every single one of the rogue judges is trying to trap the administration into defying their unconstitutional orders.
Why? The dems must believe they will gain control of the House (and possibly the Senate) so they can file articles of impeachment.
Why do they believe this? They are already hoping to win the WI supreme court in April so they can redistrict two Republicans out of their seats. It won’t take much to cheat another couple of seats in 2026 to gain a majority in the House. I believe they cheated a bunch of seats in 2024. Nobody stopped them then, why should 2026 be different? They know our elections are still not secure so I think they like their chances.
This is all to tie up the administration for the entire term and as a bonus impeach him again. Remember, there are still cases in NY waiting to sentence him when he gets out.
The worst part of this for the country is the judiciary will lose all credibility if this is allowed to continue.
Lose? They’ve already lost it BIG TIME!!!
This judge wouldn’t be doing this without confidence he has support up the line. He knows all the appeals will go in his favor, including the Supremes. He wouldn’t hang his bare-butt out the car window like this on a whim…..
This was clearly one of the main “blunt Trump” tactics the uni-party had ready in their playbook. We will see the others soon enough. Not sure what Trump can do about a completely rigged court system. We laugh at all these third-world countries with their sham judicial systems. We should be looking in the mirror. Ours is no better.
The issue in US v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 (1953) was how much information the US had to disclose about a fatal plane crash of a plane on a secret military mission. A widow of one of those killed filed under the Federal Torts Claims Act (how you sue the feds). The US would not answer discovery she filed, claiming state secrets, in particular, military secrets about experimental equipment.
The Secretary of the Air Force had filed a letter with the district court asserting the privilege. The case went up to SCOTUS, which ruled that the privilege had been properly invoked. It stated in part:
“Regardless of how it is articulated, some like formula of compromise must be applied here. Judicial control over the evidence in a case cannot be abdicated to the caprice of executive officers. Yet we will not go so far as to say that the court may automatically require a complete disclosure to the judge before the claim of privilege will be accepted in any case. It may be possible to satisfy the court, from all the circumstances of the case, that there is a reasonable danger that compulsion of the evidence will expose military matters which, in the interest of national security, should not be divulged. When this is the case, the occasion for the privilege is appropriate, and the court should not jeopardize the security which the privilege is meant to protect by insisting upon an examination of the evidence, even by the judge alone, in chambers.
In the instant case, we cannot escape judicial notice that this is a time of vigorous preparation for national defense. Experience in the past was has made it common knowledge that air power is one of the most potent weapons in our scheme of defense, and that newly developing electronic devices have greatly enhanced the effective use of air power. It is equally apparent that these electronic devices must be kept secret if their full military advantage is to be exploited in the national interests. On the record before the trial court, it appeared that this accident occurred to a military plane which had gone aloft to test secret electronic equipment. Certainly there was a reasonable danger that the accident investigation report would contain references to the secret electronic equipment which was the primary concern of the mission….
In each case, the showing of necessity which is made will determine how far the court should probe in satisfying itself that the occasion for invoking the privilege is appropriate. Where there is a strong showing of necessity, the claim of privilege should not be lightly accepted, but even the most compelling necessity cannot overcome the claim of privilege if the court is ultimately satisfied that military secrets are at stake. A fortiori, where necessity is dubious, a formal claim of privilege, made under the circumstances of this case, will have to prevail.”
So the judge has some authority to look into whether it is actually a state secret, but is not entitled to everything. His demand that the DOJ provide evidence of a “cabinet-level discussion” is apparently designed to show that the state secrets doctrine was just thought up after the fact by the DOJ, and no one in the Cabinet considered this a secret mission at the time.
It comes down to the facts of the case. And, unfortunately, how SCOTUS will view them.
I think Trump himself should file a carefully drafted statement saying there were discussions between him, the AG and and ICE officials about the flight going on at the time, but that the details are confidential.
Should have just turned the planes around, and then immediately arrested the judge for facilitating the entry of illegal aliens into the U.S.
Rather, put the judge in the plane with the criminals, so that they can express their gratitude to him! 🙂
4 pages of discussion on whether or not we should remove violent criminal gang members from America.
Lawfare mission accomplished.
I cant decide if I prefer the nickname Fani Boasberg, or Letitia Boasberg for this corrupt PO$.
Mive to recuse the judge based on bias.
Maybe we could give the judge a Tesla and chain him inside it?
Judge’s daughter profiting in cases before her Daddy, so long as he’s attacking Trump! Sounds familiar, almost like Russia, Russia, Russia thingy!
While I recognize the challenges of impeachment and/or a new Judiciary Act of 1802….and support those efforts, the fastest and readily implementable action would be for Congress to simply set up hearings on Judiciary overreach, conflicts, recusals, etc and subpoena Boasberg, his wife, his daughter and other Judges and their conflicted family members to testify (along with Engeron and his daughter exploring her fundraising during the Trump trial). Clearly Boasberg is trying to set up a contempt of
Court trap for the Administration. The Republican House needs to respond in kind asap with subpoenas and show that these judges AND conflicted family members are equally vulnerable to Bannon and Navarro type contempt of Congress crimes for non compliance. It just requires some subpoenas ASAP to put these Judges on notice.
How long does Pam sit on her hands before she files charges and she and Kash open up a National Security Investigation?
She’s not going to sit on her hands.
Not before the polish dries.
executive privilege
noun
The principle that members of the executive branch of government cannot legally be forced to disclose their confidential communications when such disclosure would adversely affect the operations or procedures of the executive branch.
If Justice Roberts and the United States Supreme Court do not fix this toxic and unprecedented situation IMMEDIATELY, our Country is in very serious trouble!”
I disagree with President Trump slightly here. If the Supreme Court is too corrupt to rein in lower court corruption that prevents the exercise of the will of the American people then “Our Country” isn’t “in very serious trouble” it is dead.
Once that line is crossed, I am in favor of President Trump going full Andrew Jackson. Do whatever is necessary to save our people, who are being gradually destroyed not only into something our Founding Fathers would not recognize, but would be horrified by.
A people that loses its country can rebuild another one, avoiding the mistakes of the first that led to its loss. This is a normal and natural process observed throughout all of human history. But if your people get destroyed, there is no coming back. Unfortunately, this is also normal and natural.
The Supreme Court needs to correct the mistake of allowing an internationalist criminal like Boasberg into our judiciary, or the last rotting tendrils of legitimacy of the Washington DC regime will fritter away, and it will time for Americans to look at this problem as not one of governmental repair, but governmental replacement. Every degenerate imperial ruling class going back to the beginning of settled civilization thought their grift would go on forever, but every one of them is dust.
Civilization cycles always come to either death and rebirth, or death ending up recounted in the pages of someone else’s history books. The oligarchs contending for control over this teetering system need to pull their heads out of the backsides and allow President Trump to make the changes necessary for stability, or those necessary changes will be made by someone else to their collective detriment after a system collapse.
We can play this game too.
From now on we shall give them ZERO convictions in every case. No more 100% conviction rates – just let them all go and the citizens will take care of justice in our communities without the black robed tyrants and their helpers.
Game on…
I just don’t understand how a judge can do this. It would be like a judge claiming that a congressional committee cannot come up with a bill or interfering in that kind of matter. Can you imagine a judge telling Congress that it cannot pass a bill? Or that a committee cannot or should do certain things? It’s crazy to me.
Ruled by the Unelected Bureaucrats
Lex Greene
Today’s democrats continue to make complete fools of themselves by claiming to “save democracy” while being the most “undemocratic” group in the country!
Not only did they illegally remove the only democratically nominated party nominee for President in Joe Biden last year and install an “un-nominated” replacement in Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, they also now use street violence, destruction of private and public property, lawfare and open threats of assassination against the duly elected President Trump and his cabinet members.
After losing all power in the Executive and Legislative branches of government and achieving the lowest approval ratings for the party in history, currently at only 27%, they have turned to the usurpation of Executive Branch authority via the only unelected branch of government, the courts.
Article I creates the sole “lawmaking” branch of the government in Congress, with members in both chambers elected by the people. Article II creates an Executive Branch with sole power over all Executive Branch Agencies, and Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Military.
Article III created the only “unelected” branch of government, the courts, which was supposed to be the least powerful branch of government as it is the only branch not elected by the people. Instead, the branch is made up of partisan political appointees, all of whom have proven to be partisan hacks engaged in promoting a particular political agenda.
These facts should be enough for all Americans to correctly conclude that the courts have no power over either of the other two branches, and for damn good reason. This “unelected” branch does NOT represent the people, but rather only the partisan political interests of those who appoint them, or those who control them!
Of course, any “democratic” form of government requires a government “elected by and accountable to” the people. The Judicial Branch is the only branch of government that is elected by and accountable to no one! As a result, it can not be allowed any power over anyone or anything, yet for over 200-years, this is the branch that has been running our country under color of law!
NOTE: Color of law refers to the appearance of legal authority or an apparently legal right that may not exist. The term is often used to describe the abuse of power under the guise of state authority and is therefore illegal.
Ruled by the Unelected!
Really America? You honestly think that our Constitution created an oligarchy of unelected and unaccountable highly partisan political appointees to rule this nation? Who the hell told you that? Have you never read the Constitution for yourself? Was it the lawyers who benefit from this lie, who convinced you the courts rule this country?
A “democracy” is defined as “a system of government in which power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or through freely elected representatives.” Why did you let your country become a nation governed by the only “unelected” branch of government?
Our Constitution didn’t even create a so-called “democracy.” It created a Representative Republican form of self-governance. Our Constitution requires a duly elected government, of, by and for the people…not an unelected partisan body always in search of more power for itself.
The problem is…people “assume” things that just aren’t true.
Because the Judicial Branch has lived well beyond its constitutional authority for over 200-years now, most Americans “assume” that’s how it’s supposed to be. In case they have any doubts, most lawyers will confirm, you are ruled by the only unelected branch of government, the courts, via so-called “case law.”
But are they right? Is it true? Or are they just additional beneficiaries of a runaway branch of government despotic in nature? It’s human nature to seek self-empowerment. That’s why the 3rd branch was given no such power!
Thomas Jefferson had it right over 200-years ago…
“At the establishment of our constitutions, the judiciary bodies were supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government. Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous; that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only, pass silent and unheeded by the public at large; that these decisions, nevertheless, become law by precedent, sapping, by little and little, the foundations of the constitution, and working its change by construction, before any one has perceived that that invisible and helpless worm has been busily employed in consuming its substance. In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life if secured against all liability to account.” (Jefferson’s letter to A. Coray, October 31, 1823)
As the only “unelected” body of government, it was granted no such power whatsoever in the Constitution. Yet, before the ink was even dry on that document, a single judge in a single court opinion, stole the power from the people in Marbury v. Madison (1803).
Since then, we have watched the court “create law” via mere court opinions (aka case law) and even amend the Constitution by the same method, including amendments never intended or envisioned by any American, legislative body or Chief Executive in the White House.
The Rule of Law, or of unelected Lawyers?
We are not a nation under the Rule of Law, but rather under the Rule of unelected lawyers. Congress makes laws…not the Judicial Branch. Even Congress is prohibited from making laws which are repugnant to the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
But the courts have been allowed to destroy our system of self-governance under the color of law, the mere appearance of such power, which constitutionally, does not exist at all.
So, it is “unconstitutional” to use the courts to overthrow the legislature or executive branch. In fact, it is an overt act of usurpation, subversion, sedition and treason!
But so long as the people know no better or lack the courage to stop the practice of lawfare in America, the courts, and anti-Americans, can do anything they want to you and this country.
What happens next is up to you, the people!
Now you know! So, what are you going to do?
https://newswithviews.com/ruled-by-the-unelected-bureaucrats/
The eternal question: What is to be done?
At this point, no matter what PDJT does or how much information he gives boasberg, he will issue a contempt order. How this will be viewed by the public is the key. I don’t give a – what this pissant judge does. Trump needs to do a Reagan and go on national TV and explain to the public making his case.
We need a true ‘patriot congress’ (which we are a long way from) that will start impeaching judges at the Federal level, including SCOTUS Justices. This is classic judicial overreach and it needs to be smacked down!
No, go after the judge. Ask the JUDGE about his family’s activities and whether the media attention he is generating is profiting the family financially.
Looks like Justice Roberts is involved in some secret shenanigans with these judges.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/revealed-chief-justice-john-roberts-caught-secretive-invite/
Shenanigans, yes, but not really secret.
After the justices push a little too far, maybe, just maybe, the military will finally step in to handle the ‘domestic’ part of ‘foreign and domestic’.
Making the rounds of the Internet is Alexander Hamilton’s explanation from The Federalist #78 Paragraph 6:
“… the judiciary… will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them.
“The Executive not only dispenses the honors, but holds the sword of the community. The legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated.
“The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever.
“It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.”
(Emphasis mine above.)
I mentioned the Dred Scott Decision earlier: no later Supreme Court decision overturned it.
The decision became irrelevant because of The Civil War and later, the 13th and 14th Amendments.
I am sure that Alexander Hamilton would find that Boasberg’s unconstitutional decision is ultimately irrelevant and no civil war or Constitutional amendment would be necessary.
Who appointed Robert chief judge? There is ur answer.
Bush43, who also appointed Alito.
OK, so he’s 1 for 2!
It’s a two-fer.
Crossfire Hurricane 3: In Uniparty We NeverTrust
Bush and Zelenski going toe-to-toe in a “conversation?” I was unaware that Bush speaks English.
Baba Yaga Schumer crowing about appointing the most judges in any administration 235. This was only 3 months ago. That’s a whole lot of Communists to pour sand in the gears of a free America.
These judges are acting accordingly to the Uniparty plan.
He didn’t do it alone, Congress with the help of Republicans did this.
Exactly. Sen Linda Graham at the forefront.
Schumer brags about the ‘temple’ ; of judges – he, who lacks simple BBQ knowhow nor basic societal norms. His kind will never learn; not even from others’ mistakes. Throughout history, there have been many examples of characters like this. But they all generally share the same characteristics: they do dumb things, don’t understand how society works and are unable to grasp even the most basic of concepts. the result as we have seen, he is facing opposition from his own party members. How many people will want to emulate him or even find it natural to like him? This is in a way loneliness. For some, even excommunication and/or exclusion. His own party members may force him to leave the pack when he is no longer useful nor does anything he’s been doing to please the pack no longer counts.
In the end, we learn, after all those errors, like Simple Simon bids “all adieu”, albeit not for valor, only for stupidity.
Exactly! The gift that keeps on giving.
“There will be a yearning for the future and not the grievances of the past.”
–Jeb Bush, Oct. 20, 2022
“The Ukrainian policy for the United States has gotta be, pretty stark. That is, we hang with them until they win.”
— George W. Bush, Nov. 16, 2022
-Zelenskiy vows to engage in returning Saakashvili back to Ukraine
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/zelenskiy-vows-engage-returning-saakashvili-back-ukraine-2021-10-03/
-Bush and Saakashvili: A Case Study in What Not to Do
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/bush-and-saakashvili-a-case-study-in-what-not-to-do/
You Mean Chief Pedo & SCROTUS – Filth