In a major 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court has finally addressed the expansive regulatory use of executive agencies to create law through interpretation. The 40-year-old Chevron ruling granted the executive agencies of government the ability to interpret laws and apply restrictions/regulations based on their own rules and definitions therein.
The Supreme Court put the judicial branch back into the equation by ruling that courts will decide what laws apply when the legislation is ambiguous on detail. This shift in prior precedent could have major ramifications. [MORE AT SCOTUS BLOG]
In another big case, the court ruled in favor of Joseph Fischer a Pennsylvania police officer charged in the January 6th protest with “obstructing an official proceeding.” [FULL RULING HERE]
The law at the center of Fischer’s case is 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2), and as noted by Julie Kelly, “The statute … has been applied in roughly 350 J6 cases; it also represents two of four counts in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s J6-related criminal indictment of Donald Trump in Washington.”
Julie Kelly – […] In a 6-3 decision, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that the “c2” subsection is tethered to the “c1” subsection that addresses tampering with a record, document, or “object.”
Roberts was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Justice Amy Coney Barrett authored the dissent (!) joined by Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor.
Today’s decision means hundreds of Americans have been wrongfully prosecuted by Attorney General Merrick Garland as he insists his department is dedicated to upholding the “rule of law” and pursuing justice “without fear or favor.” (read more)
The DOJ now has to figure out how it will respond to losing the majority charge in many of the J6 cases. However, the DOJ immediately responded with the following press release:
MAIN JUSTICE – The Justice Department issued the following statement from Attorney General Merrick B. Garland on the Supreme Court’s decision in Fischer v. United States:
“January 6 was an unprecedented attack on the cornerstone of our system of government — the peaceful transfer of power from one administration to the next. I am disappointed by today’s decision, which limits an important federal statute that the Department has sought to use to ensure that those most responsible for that attack face appropriate consequences.
The vast majority of the more than 1,400 defendants charged for their illegal actions on January 6 will not be affected by this decision. There are no cases in which the Department charged a January 6 defendant only with the offense at issue in Fischer. For the cases affected by today’s decision, the Department will take appropriate steps to comply with the Court’s ruling.
We will continue to use all available tools to hold accountable those criminally responsible for the January 6 attack on our democracy.” (read more)
Harvard Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz said the Supreme Court was correct in its ruling to make it harder to charge Jan. 6 defendants with obstruction.
Yes, we lost the 1st amendment case, but these are very good, especially hopefully for J6ers.
Brant the 1st amendment case to which you refer has been GROSSLY MISS-CHARACTERIZED in that it was decided on STANDING not MERIT. That means that the ISSUE can and probably will, come back to the SCOTUS for adjudication. You are right that is not the ruling that WE might have desired but it is not a loss by any means, just a delay.
True. It was only as to whether the injunction on government speech between now and a decision on the merits should have been issued.
if you read the alito dissent, it is clear the standing WAS MET. And more importantly, if you read thoroughly it would be that SCOTUS intentionally dismissed the claims based on standing to ignore and refuse to hear the challenges of 1st amendment prohibitions. This is more than kicking the can own the road. No. In fact there is a PATTERN OF USING/MANIPULATION wrt standing.
remember this single description:
inexplicable.
this is the one word that justice Thomas wrote in his dissent when SCOTUS refused to hear the Paxton case (also signed and supported by 21 other AG’s). That case was essentially refused because SCOTUS ruled that TX AG had not harm/injury/standing to bring suit against other states *PA if I remember correctly. Let that sink in.
fact: PA and several other states VIOLATED their OWN law. Permitted an unelected official to change election laws. mail ins, signature verifications suspended, and deadline to count votes extended by almost a month. A clear violation that would realize more political power FOR PA than any other state. Clearly the voters in TX (and all other states to be more precise) would have been disadvantaged by these last minute violations to law..
yet, SCOTUS in majority rules paxton, tx ag to have no harm and not injury and standing.
realize this isn’t just a amy Comey barrett problem. this is a problem with scotus KNOWING that the election was stolen and then allowing it to happen.
these are the facts
God Bless America
The doctrine of Standing is an abomination facilitating selective judgment and barring our Rights from standing at the bar seeking justice.
You know, that unbalanced scale thingy.
Furthermore, I consider that the Derp State must be destroyed!
nuked from orbit. and then salted…to be sure
Maquis, I would submit that it is not the doctrine of standing itself, but its abuse and misuse in the last decade that is the problem.
The basic concept is that courts do not get to opine or decide on hypotheticals.
There must be an actual “case or controversy ” before a court has any power at all to render judgment. Courts have bandwidth too.
If I try to take my neighbor to court because I am allergic to cats, and I heard a rumor my neighbor was at the pound looking at cats last week, I don’t get to run to my local circuit court and sue my neighbors for harm. There’s no actual case or controversy. At least not yet.
Part of determining whether there’s an actual case or controversy is ascertaining whether there’s a compensable or preventable harm.
If I sue the Governor of Illinois for allowing child mutilation surgeries, but I’m in Arizona and I have no other connection- I just don’t like the policy – I’m not personally harmed by Pritzker’s actions. I don’t have standing.
I agree that in the Missouri v. Biden case, there’s plenty of evidence of past harm (I don’t see a question of standing
as to the completed harms), and the majority had to put on some hell of a rose colored glasses to not conclude that the defendant were almost certainly going to keep doing what they were doing. So, there should have been standing as to the future, foreseeable, continuing violations of the plaintiffs first Amendment rights.
Major league pretending went on. And some very concerning leftist language appeared in that opinion.
I have no explanation for the standing ruling on the 2020 election. That one was ridiculous.
It’s the judges, not the rule.
Remember, Al Gore had standing to sue in the Florida ballot case in 2000 but President Trump and the Texas AG didn’t have standing to sue in 2016.
Why?
Because they threw 20 million fake votes in the hopper.
.
Very nice explanation of how standing is supposed to work.
.
Serious question. If the NAACP or similar groups can sue on the basis of skin color, sexual orientation, etc and have standing anywhere in the country on the basis of supporting said group, why are Americans denied their right to due process when the very nature of their citizenship gives them standing?
Why are federal courts disallowing one citizen of a state from suing on behalf of another if every state’s citizenry is affected by the issue? The election of the president is a national issue and every citizen in the country should have standing.
Wouldn’t Surgeon General Vivek Murthy be considered a “minister or counsel” of the executive branch? If so, then anyone suing him would have standing.
An inferior officer of the executive branch.
.
I suspect that you mean the abuse of “standing”. Every case requires it.
.
Perfect.
I am and have been convinced beyond a reasonable doubt, to coin a legal standard, that elements of the SC are compromised.
2-3 seem to be rabid ideologues, 2, maybe 3 seem to be unaffected. But 4-5, in particular Robert’s, appear to me to be beholden to ‘something’ behind the scenes, if for no other reason, the seemingly disparate trains of thought and logic behind various cases. Makes no other sense to me.
I no longer think “in terms of compromise”. I do believe there is a incentive. a financial benefit derived from making these outrageous rulings.
I often reflect on santos…someone the media a press has very rapidly decided deserves no more attention.
well. I remember. He said two things before he was “dismissed” not impeached. remember this clearly…he was unconstitutionally removed from his senate seat. no other member has been removed in this fashion in all of US history, outside of assassination or a duel.
the two things:
” clerk comes around to each office on Tuesday and tells the staff which stocks to invest/dump” it is always a winner. Everyone does it. You make lots of money just by being a member”
“the staffers are doing perverted sex in the chambers”
one of these two statements PROVED TRUE with video evidence.
one of these two statements has not *yet* been proven true.
which of the two statements made by santos do you believe resulted in his unconstitutional dismissal from his seat? both?
see, the problem I have with this is how silent the press has become..disinterested. totally pretending not to know things.
I don’t know santos..but I know when a story doesn’t add up.
the math on this one doesn’t add up.
God Bless America
I totally agree with you.
However, when I use the word ‘compromised,’ I use it as a broad stroke of potentialities that include financial incentive.
We are in total agreement.
And yes, I too remember that egregious departure of unconstitutional removal of Santos.
The fact that no member of Congree so much as addressed that issue spoke volumes of the entire body.
just adding more texture in my own way…not taking away from your wise comments, simply advancing the same track.
I also agree with you if there was any doubts to the contrary. there are none.
the silence of the entire “body” of congress to not even discuss the “claims of Santos” is more than disturbing to me.
where is the greater criminal….the bandit who robs the bank, or the paid armed security who walks away while it goes down and pretends to see nothing?
that is the truth about DC. I noticed this at a very young age, 13 when living in dale city. I delivered the potomac news. My brother, the washington post in sundays…a heavy weight paper in the day, both.
it’s personal for me. I ran away from “home”, because I could literally feel the corruption and the gross abuse of power…it was palpable. I could also see and feel it on my fathers’ eyes and shoulders each day when he returned home around 10 PM each night from the Pentagon.
I didn’t run away from my family. I was trying to save my soul…A mere kid in a strange land who just wanted a chance to experience life absent the vile behaviors of political power.
I relate to this younger generation in more ways than any of my peers of my generation. I felt cheated by the condition of DC. Fortunately, my family has learned to understand the ambition of a very young unspoiled mind. I have come full circle now, having made my agenda to dismantle mordor in every single way that I can. Even if it simply means writing about it and speaking up.
God Bless America
Poignant story / background, regitiger. It only adds to your credibility..
Carry on. 👍
I did local politics in Fairfax County for 15 years before deciding that almost everyone in politics on both sides were working together to rob the public and cooperated bipatisanly to block honest people from entering or progressing. I walked away in 1995 and left the area for 30 years.
I am back in the area today to take care of my mother.
You’re one of the few before the internet era who realized the corruption in the government versus the bullsh*t that the public was being fed. The news media kept most of that quiet so only folks like yourself with firsthand knowledge were truly aware.
Now there’s no good excuse to not be wise to the serious problems we are facing with a government loaded with immoral, unethical, power, wealth, and status seeking characters.
IMHO they’re all operating corruptly with the thought, “Everybody is doing it and getting theirs, so I’m gonna get mine too.”
I feel very sad about your experience as a youth.
Mine was not as traumatic in terms of witnessing it as a youth.
My Awakening took place as a young adult.
Similarly to you, I feel the younger folks’ angst and disgust also and relate to it and engage those I think are reachable or are searching for and answer or confirmation of their concerns.
My personal lifelong dilemma on this subject matter is the dismissal of my thoughts, ostracizination, marginalization, and complete lack of belief or consideration by family and close friends who could not or would not even consider the plausibility of my views regarding such, until recently.
In a quirky way, we are kindred spirits.
Bless you, Regi!
Just like not a single member of the Senate speaking up for a single day of recess for 4 years speaks volumes.
…Bob Menendez still has his Senate seat after multiple indictments and no Republicans have pressed for his resignation!
Couldn’t Speaker Johnson have offered Santos for Menendez?
menendez has proven to “play ball before”…and consequently was untouched. We shall see how things go.
also: has menendez ever publicly stated such corruption in his career? (see the diff)?
There are different kinds of incentive – some of which are based on one being compromised.
There can be an incentive to not be outed for some past offense which could bring one public shame, being ostracized, cause marital or family problems, or even legally at risk. Such incentive of course involves being compromised.
There can also be incentive in the form of threat. Decide as we wish or something may happen to yourself or a loved one. Justice Scalia is one such who stood his ground. Multiple justices have been threatened – publicly, including when one of the most vile and evil senators, Schumer, stood on the steps of the SC and talked of them “reaping the world wind” and instigating the crowd. Then there was his 6 ways to Sunday comment about PDJT.
Could SOME of it be about money – sure – but IMO most of it, while there may be money involved, isn’t based on or successful due to potential or realized monetary gains.
^^^THIS!^^^
We are where we are because of the cowardice of the SCROTUS, for which I hold the Chief Johnson responsible. The more he struggles to keep the court legitimate, the more he delegitimizes it.
The issue is that SCOTUS keeps determining that no one has standing to contest anything whenever they sense a tiny bit of blowback from the leftist media. Punting is their preferred tactic. Thank the Lord for Clarence Thomas and his steel backbone. If only President Trump had put three similar justices on the court. Or even one.
Thank you. I really don’t appreciate the fact that commentators don’t “read” the entire report/order and then create a sensational lede that is MISLEADING. This particular case will be back…sometimes our best lawyers don’t do the due diligence when preparing the petitions. This will be back.
The DOJ still have to follow the law. They seem to just make it up to meet their own agenda.
Do you honestly believe that first sentence?
Have you been asleep like Rip van Winkle over the last decade+? The law means nothing to them, other than an object to be twisted and heated into a weapon against those who resist the agenda…
Rule by experts just got a whole lot harder. About time!
There’s been lots of news in the last 24 hours, but it’s possible that the most consequential event amidst all this will be the Supreme Court’s decision in a case known as Loper Bright.
Basically, it will trigger a sea change in all regulations.
https://x.com/JBSDC/status/1806799823107997893
1,700 appeals court cases and 7 SCOTUS cases were decided using Chevron deference.
The Court was clear that its ruling does not, by itself, change the outcome of those cases – but every single one of them can now be challenged and possibly overturned.
You know how the government “experts” get to tell us what lightbulb and which shower faucet we can use? A state of affairs that is beyond ridiculous in a country of free citizens in which government power was designed to be limited?
Buh bye totalitarian leftists!!
See. You. In. Court.
Yes, what lightbulb, shower faucet, toilet tank, stove/oven, car to drive, etc…
This crap HAS to stop, or else we are no longer the USA.
If you want a “water-saving” faucet or shower head, fine, go get one. If you want an electric stove, buy one. If you favor an electric car, go shopping for one.
This Deep State is trying to MANDATE that we buy what they dictate we buy. BS. ARNF the vaxx-clot shot mandates. Declare this cabal, this regime UNCONSTITUTIONAL and stop it by voting for DJT in November.
it was never about ideaology or preventing earth death by heat. it was about creating new ways to create never fail govt funded (free money) subsidies.
the oil companies were silent did little resistance too because put simply: driving demand down by forced scarcity is more profitable than trying to create more growth.
see, we are not peak oil..we are peak scarcity (driven falsely by global bankers who fund “new green” bull manure)
I paid nearly 3 dollar for a gallon of gas today. That is up to 10 percent corn/grain alcohol. The cost of producing and transporting that one gallon is about 1.50. the rest is more than just profit margin. just simple greed.
that’s the funny thing about ev’s people really don’t get. it is a means to drive up the price of energy. big oil is very pleased with this plan…
God Bless America
God Bless America
Please don’t disregard the taxes you pay for each gallon of gasoline. They are far from insignificant.
I paid $3.49 a gallon for gas just yesterday.
You’re correct in that it has nothing at all to do with “saving the earth” or “saving mankind.” However, it’s exceedingly more than just creating subsidies – which are merely a means to get concurrence (buying votes) to implement things. It’s about control and ownership of everyone and everything.
Chevron was also used to do far more than just drive energy shenanigans. One such example is the utter nonsense of water control via regulations like those dealing with areas that puddle up on your land – or making it illegal to collect rain water.
And then the good guys have to pay yet again to right the wrong.
If President Trump implements Schedule F, and gets rid of the income tax, it will largely take care of itself, at least for quite a while.
Abolish the Department of Education, abolish the IRS, abolish the FBI . . . We will hardly recognize the place.
Trump doesn’t have to abolish any law enforcement agency right away, he can remove their security clearances and cancel their Law Enforcement Commissions. 95% will quit.
There are a lot of 3 letter agencies and mountains of bureaucracy that need to be dealt with Alex. 😉
Yep and enrich the Communist legal system and their law enforcement enforcers we’ll be battling too, for any of us who aren’t battling them already like I am.
How does this hamstring efforts PDJT wishes to make? That’s what I’d be looking at, and am. The Communists don’t take a dump without a plan. Including SCOTUS.
Ha ha ha
When I moved to California I couldn’t buy a high-flow shower nozzle from Amazon!
It was banned from delivery to California!
Very easy to modify with a drill bit 😉
Could you provide some insight? I never heard of this case. When I clicked on your link to “x” it was in tiny print and not at all descriptive.
How “consequential” is this event? Am I the only one who has never heard of it?
It’s the case Sundance talked about in this post that struck down the Chevron doctrine.
Loper was the case where a law was brought in to supply Gov funded monitors for Commercial Fishermen to track their movements in the Atlantic. The body ran out of funding money and had the rule changed by the Administaive body to have the Fishermen pay for the expensive equipment themselves.
Worse – they were forced to pay the salaries of their federal overseers who were assigned to their boats to treat them like criminals who were almost presumed guilty of violating fishing limits
Oh jeez. I know a fisherman who was very affected by this rule. He outright quit “gill-netting” because of it. I guess i never knew the name of the exact sponsor of the bill.
I just attributed it to NOAA.
Thank you for the input.
it ALSO had the effect of causing smaller scale fisherman to not be able to get a license..and so this would cause the entry level to be beyond the reach of the smaller scale fishermen. Thus, producing a no lose proposition to very large scale politically connected and administrative state friendly fishing businesses. Like mconald’s to be specific with it’s fleet of cod and white fish fleet, whom I will remind was in favor of a whole industry wide regulation that would REQUIRE fishing boats to pay for fishing monitory, their meals and berthing AND the insurance liability up to and including coverage for harm while out at sea. Yes, see how the major corporations often are the enemy of the small, industrious hard working smaller businesses?
God Bless America
It is the same dynamic that was used by Big Ag to create the meat packer oligarchy, that prevents small local slaughterhouses.
All for “safety ” of course.
That regulation killed our small town meat packer business owned by a long time local family.
We don’t need our local mom and pop’s killed off big government. Please support your local family businesses.
“safety” ≠ safety
“safety” = $$$$$$$$$
Yes, I see it. And abhor what corporations are doing to our local American businesses.
The case that seemed like it was taken directly from some playbook of the “Supreme” Soviet Communists.
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. This is the case that has rather emphatically overruled the 1984 case of Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council.
It is the name of the case that Sundance is referencing as the Chevron reversal
More here:
https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/blog/2024-6-28-the-end-of-chevron-deference
It means that only Congress has the power to make laws not federal agencies who consistently expand existing laws to cover other matters!
This may help you:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1806799823107997893.html
Your X-marks-the-blot link is to a single post announcing a thread, which non-Xers cannot see.
Could you post a ThreadReader link for us so we can review and study this worthy find?
Most appreciated!!
This may work better.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1806799823107997893.html
Excellent!
Thank you.
IF… We will continue to use all available tools to hold accountable those criminally responsible for the January 6 attack on our democracy.”
THEN… Prosecute Nancy Pelosi for her conniving and criminal manipulation of a peaceful march at the Capitol.
I despise Pelosi (but on par with Killary and Pence).
Hear, hear!!
She is way too busy right now, collecting herself to have that tuff love conversation with J & J about exiting the stage. Her nephew needs to come measure for new drapes.
Six ways to Sunday.
Can’t those three bitches on the Court EVER decide a case based on the Constitution?
Jackson actually sided with the conservatives and Barrett sided with the dissent. I am wondering if Roberts arranged it to protect the SC from being called just a right wing court.
That’s exactly what Roberts has been doing!
it certainly has that odor doesn’t it? bull manure
Ideally, that should never happen. But those long ago days of pure honesty, an apolitical Judiciary are in our rear-view mirrors, sadly.
Yeah, that jumped out at me too. And I have to wonder somewhere along the same lines.
Everything managed by Roberts is theater – from the lists of which cases get granted cert, to the timing of when opinions are released, to which ones get punted for standing. Yes I would not be surprised if Roberts is brokering among some justices for some to trade votes. I doubt Thomas and Alito would ever agree to play that game. But the weak-sisters yes.
who cares about Dershowitz?
Also, for a good read on the Chevron case, go to Tierneys Real News, Chevron & the Deep State.
Sorry, I don’t have the link. I printed it out for a reference point.
Link:
Chevron & the Deep State
The Supreme Court just struck down the Chevron Doctrine (Deference) which has poisoned our country for almost 40 years. This is a MAJOR ruling. The people we elect to make the laws aren’t the ones who actually make the laws today – it’s done by unelected bureaucrats in the administrative state.
Indeed. Congress has abdicated their rule making authority to various agencies for decades. Both on a federal and state level.
Will congress suddenly stand up to the bullies and start doing their job? At this point we can still pretend.
thank you
De rien.
If the Congress, bc of the Chevron Doctrine or any other reason, no longer actually makes laws and it is done by unelected bureaucrats in the Admin. state, one of 2 things need to happen. Dismiss Congress as they are not doing their job to review Admin suggestions for law and implementing law or not. Other side, throttle back the unelected bureaucrats and/or dismiss them. Develop regulations thru Congress, into law stopping the Admin State from writing their own law. Just spitballing here….
I’ve offered suggestions in the threat to that effect.
Make Congress do its job, don’t let Derps do it.
Force Congress to do an annual review and approval of every least rule suggested by the bureaucrats before they can go into force, valid only via a passed stand alone amendment to the originating legislation.
Who cares about Dershowitz?
Trump does and mentions him positively often.
Pedo Island
Who cares about Dershowitz?
Trump does and mentions him often.
I have been intentionally cable news and media absent, so If you would kindly make reference when President Trump referred to dershowitz ?
serious question. Not an angle. I would like to say I stay informed, but lately that just has not been possible for me.
God Bless America
And on Monday the S Ct will release its opinion in the presidential immunity case, Trump vs. U.S. Big day, July 1.
Ten days before DJT is sentenced on 7/11.
This is a huge victory, but temper it with this thought:
Federal agencies can and will continue to refuse to enforce laws they don’t like or don’t agree with, unless they want to selectively target groups or individuals.
Yes, and they have been, especially with FJB’s ongoing defiance of the SCOTUS regarding cancellation of college school loans.
Bingo. Just like they’ve been doing. It’s been working even though it clearly violates ethics and a great number of sworn oaths, and they’ll just keep right on doing it.
That’s pretty much what I read the DOJ saying in what Sundance quoted. “Too bad the Supreme Court is stupid. We will go on doing whatever we feel like.”
While these two rulings are unalloyed great news, it seems the Berian AG Garland intends to slow walk the reviews of sentences for the J6 political prisoners/martyrs. Worst case he will ignore the ruling completely, just as he has his Contempt of Congress conviction.
I see also that Justice Two Names dissented in Fischer. That’s two strikes. We’ve got her for another 30 years.
We’ve got a long way to go in restoring our Constitutional Republic.
But these two rulings are the most significant indication we’ve had that the pendulum has begun its return journey.
Taking the good news and rejoicing.
Amy Phony Bare-it.
Her fraudulent Constitutionalist pose is indeed naked to the world.
Let’s accept reality. PDJT nominated ACB. She was “depicted” as a conservative. A conservative who has a house-full of adopted children of all races, colors, intellect, etc.
She was the supposedly Christian caring wife, mother, and bearer of some “truths.” The Left branded her as “The Handmaid’s Tale.” BOTH SIDES WERE WRONG. ACB is an insidious snake who infiltrated her way into the SCOTUS.
Amy cried when George Floyd died!
Wasn’t she, and others, recommended by the “Federalist Society”?
Or, something like that. Time to not take their recommendations.
I would like to read the back story on this recommendation.
I am sure Mike Pence had a great deal of influence over the ACB nomination.
Two name was a huge mistake imo! What a you know what!!
I hope should the opportunity arise for President Trump to appoint another Justice, he will give no weight to any recommendations which will surely come from the Federalist Society.
In fact I hope he won’t let them anywhere near the WH.
Amen to that!
.
And please no more women.
.
No Wide Latinas!
And no more pedophile controlled pervert men , weak men, men with no backbone or men with any liberal agendas.
Betsy, you are 110% correct. Garland will do nothing for the rest of this year to review the sentences of normal USA demonstrators who are being unlawfully attacked as insurrectionists.
Yeah, he will provide the BS that “we’re working on it.” But nothing will change under this Deep State takeover of OUR country.
rita, I truly believe he is still marinating in his fury at being hooked of what he sees as his “rightful” seat on the SC.
And by golly he’s going to make everybody pay for that!!!
I dare say his resentments go back many many generations.
As my husband would say…
He’s a well balanced individual… he’s got a chip on both shoulders.
Garland was the DOJ person in charge of Oklahoma City when the bombing went down.
Just like Vegas, evidence went unexplored and things were buried.
Not a coincidence. He has been rewarded up the ladder for his service to the Cabsl.
The dots are connecting at a staggering rate – thanks, Alex!
This I knew but had forgotten. Thank you for the memory jog.
The threads of history are long and intertwined.
Unless we the people find a way to demand justice for our fellow citizens.
I think Amy Coney Barrett needs to sit nightly and read the Constitution
Law professors 🙄
A refresher course?
Agree.
She’s too busy rewriting it
So how can we get rid of her? And some of the others.
Amy Bader Ginsburg is completely compromised.
Ginsburg often set aside her liberal biases and sided with the Constitution – whereas ACB wouldn’t know the difference between the Constitution and constipation.
Because she believes in the institutions not the Constitution.
It will matter not. They will corrupt another legal fairytale and march ahead.
Look at how long it took to get this one through the system.
They don’t play by the rules and in their world the end justifies the means.
Good will defeat evil but damn it sure takes a long time.
What it took was President Trump getting control over SCOTUS, and I don’t mean just through the nominations.
The move of SCOTUS leftward, and ever more statist, began with the horrendous series of cases in the 30’s, which also need to be overturned. That was Roosevelt exercising raw power to try to move to something very like national socialism.
In order to overturn and roll back the Administrative State, it first took both installing a couple of people who didn’t come with strings (Thomas, Alito, maybe Gorsuch), and seizing firm control of the strings attached to others (Kavanaugh, Roberts). And maybe deliberately installing or allowing the installation of a couple of others so those strings can be yanked or exposed at the right
time (Barrett, Jackson)
IMHO.
BTW, if the Court rules for only limited immunity on Monday, I for one will take that as further evidence of Team Trump’s control of SCOTUS.
I know, I know – he has put on a great big show of “Immunity must be absolute!” Optics.
He wants the Clinton’s, Obama’s, and Bushes in jail as much as any of us do.
And I believe he needs them to be very,very afraid of prosecution when he comes back into the Oval Office.
Chess, not checkers.
Great observations, particularly on the move left during FDR’s Administration.
The History of these matters is coming increasingly to the fore, and not a moment too soon.
We must know the soiled earth the Derp State edifice was built upon in order to fully undermine it.
Speaking of history, Vigano alluded to a plethora of subjects that several of us opine on here in his latest release of a letter addressing his alleged schism with the Catholic Church.
It was on TGP early this morning.
It is perhaps his finest work ever!!!
Still working through it, incredible non-pretending detail, I posted the link you referenced on the first page, will echo it here too.
Vigiano is an absolute treasure and is securing his honored place in history.
“J’Accuse”- Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò Releases Statement On the Accusation of Schism Against Him
This is a historic document indeed.
I believe it will join the Magna Carta, the Aeropagatica, the Declaration of Arbroath, the Declaration of Independence, and other such documents in echoing down the centuries, God willing.
And I’m not even Catholic.
Consider for us to discuss this on PP tomorrow. <
Perhaps my post was a bit hopeless in tenor. I am truly hopeful these days as slowly the deep state marionettes are losing bit by bit. As I have learned here; eyes are now open and can’t be closed again. The days of pretended by so many are diminishing.
Some good news out of Eileen Cannon and a favorable immunity ruling would, in my opinion, put some lube on the machine of eye opening and could ignite the awakening we seek.
I am hopeful and in the mean time…living my best life.
Great comments, TSV, but IMO the Great Awakening is real and gaining steam by the minute!
I am very stoked by what I see on this site and others — and that includes that voters are understanding that the Dems planned to chop off Pinocchio Joe at the knees with this debate so they could pitch somebody else equally monstrous to oppose DJT!
Here’s to continuing with this good news by a positive ruling on immunity and a great Judge Cannon move, just to “seal the deal”!
We all have a mixture of feelings, full spectrum. Different parts of it will rise to the surface at different times.
Very prophetic my new friend.
Like using welfare offices all across the country to distribute 2024 ballots to illegals, all across the country.
Digressing, but it does help prove the point.
No one was charged with only this statute. But, I understand that many plea agreements were obtained by threatening to add this charge. Those deals were thereby unconstitutionally obtained. It is very, very difficult to reverse a plea of guilty. The petion will have to be filed with the same corrupt judge that put them in jail.
Not all charged and convicted were “pleadings” of guilt. Many stood their ground and fought it, ie Ryan Samsel, and guilt was decided by a judge or jury in many, if not most cases. There is a huge difference between that and a plea bargain.
The prosecutors and judges also used this as a means to enhance sentences to what could be argued as extremely excessive, ie “cruel and unusual” punishment which is constitutionally barred.
Just curious about the reference to Tommy Tutone, 8675309, Jenny?
8675310 must be her sister.
Yes, it is a Stasi regime TPTB put into place as soon as they rigged the 2020 Presidential election. It is going to take a lot of time and work to undo this total coup that THEY delivered and still support. It might take way more than “time and support.”
it will take the determination OF THE PEOPLE WHO BEAR PAIN THEY CANNOT AFFORD.
we are close, but not quite there yet.
this isn’t a wish or a desire, simply a foreboding examination of what is just around the “corner”.
be prepared. most are not. be different.
God Bless America
THIS JUST IN:
Judges re-sentencing the J6ers will change the misdemeanor sentences from ‘concurrent’ to ‘sequential’.
A lot of J6ers are not going to want to risk having their sentence increased and will stay with the status quo. Most of the misdemeanors carry a one year max sentence and a fine!
Imagine how many will instead fight it for the good of the country.
True, but in many if not most cases the other charges were nonsense misdemeanors like “unlawful parading” where the maximum penalties are far lower.
This should get many J6’ers out on time served and might wipe all felonies from many of them.
“We will continue to use all available tools to hold accountable those criminally responsible for the January 6 attack on our democracy.” (read more)”
Merrick Garland needs to be held accountable for a plethora of crimes. Number one, obstruction of Justice and covering for of the Biden Crime Family.
Merrick Garland is evil personified. He is taking out his revenge on Republicans, on PDJT supporters , because he was NOT CONFIRMED to the SCOTUS as he planned and felt entitled to. ENTITLED. that is the bottom line in all these Deep State operatives.
J6 – this will release some maybe; mitigate sentences on others.
DOj will most likely pursue harsher sentences on other charges.
However, this overturned abuse may potentially lead to unraveling the whole mess in time.
Chevron – more power back to the Judicial Branch over unelected career ideologue Executive Branch subversives as it should be.
Moreover, there are potential ramifications in the future of stamping out this excuse by bureaucracies, particularly LEO and prosecutors misuse and abuse of concepts of discretion over oaths of office AND the absurd idea and use that an agency’s policies and guidelines can replace or substitute statutory and case law.
This is a huge deal!
Judges re-sentencing the J6ers will change the misdemeanor sentences from ‘concurrent’ to ‘sequential’.
A lot of J6ers are not going to want to risk having their sentence increased and will stay with the status quo. Most of the misdemeanors carry a one year max sentence and a fine!
Is there a credible source for this?
My understanding of this particular charge was that it was already tried as a felony.
Over the target and arrow near the jugular of the Beast when it screams and threatens like this in response:
https://www.vox.com/scotus/357900/supreme-court-loper-bright-raimondo-chevron-power-grab
FTA:
It is a radical reordering of the US separation of powers, giving the one unelected branch of government all of its own power, plus much of the power that Congress has vested in the executive branch.
Congress has vested too much power in the Executive Branch, and going forwards legislation should be much less a grant of licentious liberty to the executive and far more constrained in scope and much more detailed in the manner it describes the imagined implementation of its acts.
The solution isn’t to demonize the courts, it’s to demand Congress be true solons and be neither puppets nor wholesale dispensers of its authority, most particularly as it has long been at the behest of and for the benefit of the Administrative State.
Furthermore, I consider that the Derp State must be destroyed!
Will the overruling of Chevron bring about a significant change in the dynamic of endless government growth? I think so, but perhaps not immediately. Note that Loper Bright is coming now near the end of a Biden term, where the odds seem to increasingly favor the return of a Republican administration in 2025. Such a new administration will be highly likely to seek large-scale roll-backs of recently issued regulations, most notably in the areas of climate and energy. The Chevron doctrine has been useful to agencies in regulatory roll-backs as well as expansions. Obviously there have been far fewer roll-backs than expansions over the past many decades. But indeed the Chevron case itself arose in the context of a regulatory roll-back by EPA during the Reagan administration, which roll-back had been blocked by the DC Circuit. The DC Circuit is currently dominated by Biden and Obama-appointed judges, who can be expected to resist regulatory roll-backs of a new Trump administration.
https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/blog/2024-6-28-the-end-of-chevron-deference
“Chevron deference” is the ultimate unfettering of the government to enable it to expand as much as it wants, and with nothing to stop it. Of course every agency interpretation of a statute or regulation will be in a way to give the agency itself more power! For Exhibit A, look to the EPA under Obama, which has interpreted the term “waters of the United States” to cover every puddle and wet spot (in order to claim jurisdiction over a good half of all private land) and has determined that a colorless, odorless gas (CO2) is a “danger to human health and welfare” (in order to claim jurisdiction over the entire energy sector of the economy).
Every bit of legislation that allows or directs the creation of interpretive regulation should require every jot and tittle of such subsequent fetters upon our freedoms to be reviewed and approved by Congress itself before it can be implemented, in an individual and specific piece of amending legislation.
Make Congress Accountable Again.
every so often, I read a few lines of artfully original forms. Today, Marquis, you are quoted as such.
God Bless America
noting: a jot and a tittle are the smallest stroked in the koine greek written language (not necessarily the alphabet per se, but a icon of sort to make a very important distinction). that is, the words in the text are to be regarded as trustworthy, even to the smallest details.
God Bless America
The Obama administration really did use that to send a good man to jail for building a stock pond on his own property, miles from any river – much less a navigable one.
I despise the people who made that WOTUS power grab, and who prosecuted a man for just farming.
Some of these bureaucrats are just plain evil:
https://www.westernjournal.com/78-year-old-veteran-sent-prison-fined-130k-digging-ponds-property-obama-epa-ruling/
Where is justice?
can we fire them all now?
Can you see the whites of their eyes yet?
I would love to see Anna Paulina Luna’s Inherent Contempt resolution get passed
Pretty bad the KBJ is more conservative than ACB.
Ironic, isn’t it?
Thought the same thing.
No! It’s just Roberts attempting to show you that Supreme Court Justices are not politically biased.
It’s just Kabuli Theater!
Kabuli theater for the courts and Kabuki theater for congress. Now what are the other type kabuki’s for our other two branches of government??
Kablooi!
From orbit.
The only way to be sure.
Maybe ACB is proving that she is not entirely one sided (Conservative). After all, her vote here did not matter, did it. This might prove her more valuable vote on Monday is unbiased to the media, etc.
The Chevron case is sort of a head start in the dismantling of the extra and Supra-constitutional administrative state which President Trump hopes to remedy.
There was a third case with a positive outcome that has received very little attention. It has to do with the right to a jury trial. The SEC has been taking defendants charged with fraud before the SEC administrative law judges where the government wins cases over 90% of the time. These judges are employed and paid by the government agency, so they can hardly be considered “independent.” In addition, defendants do not have the right to representation, if they cannot afford it. This is a huge win in my opinion and I am hoping there are far reaching consequences.
👆👆👆👆
Jarkesy held that Administrative agencies may not violate the constitutional right under the 7th amendment to a jury trial for any possible penalty exceeding $20, by forming their own administrative law courts and having fines imposed by judges.
Receive a notice from the EPA that your restaurant is in violation of some regulation about your gas stoves and either switch them to electric or receive a $10,000 fine?
Not any more.
Jury trial.
The power to tax is the power to destroy. So is the power to issue fines.
Will the Administrative Law Courts become constrained by this judgment?
What a raft of abominations have been imposed on this land of putative liberty.
The ones with the power to issue fines, yes.
There’s a whole structure of Administrative Law Courts that throttle certain entitlements – Social Security Disability applications, Medicare benefits appeals, etc. Those won’t be affected. It will still take 5 years and three levels of review to get your SSDI application approved.
It will be interesting to see whether this bleeds over to the immigration courts, which are staffed almost entirely by ALJ’s.
Illegal aliens in general do not possess constitutional rights, because they aren’t US citizens or even legally in the country, although the courts have created some exceptions (right to an abortion – surpised?). The left may attempt to use Jarkesy to bollux up the largest deportation in history. I wouldn’t be surprised.
SEC Chief Gensler has been using the SEC to attack any company that doesn’t follow the Democrat Leftist Woke doctrine like Elon Musk!
Chevron ruling is a giant hit to the lawless federal bureaucracy and a win for American citizens.
The legal reasoning for Chevron was total nonsense, and we had heard that Roberts, and probably Thomas, was gunning for an opportunity to take it down…
As a conservative trapped in Canada we suffer the endless death by a thousand cuts.
Stephen Harper, a wonderful man, got classified as a huge threat to world freedom because he supported Israel.
The following two Conservative leaders (must I name them?) passed from the scene, mercifully fast.
Trudeau fil (ptui!) remains popular with the media (all going broke, faster than American media) and a handful of swells in big cities, and the elderly: the welfare State is broke, and the elderly can’t face it.
(Said it elsewhere, please allow me the re-post it here)
Sir Napsalot 4 hours ago
About that string of Big SCOTUS rulings –
FJB, his admin, and Deep State will totally ignore those rulings they don’t like, continue their business as usual.
Because we don’t have a functioning republic, there are not power checks, and Congress commits dereliction of duty on a daily basis.
I sense a Trump Meme aborning here . . .
Wakey Wakey!!
Everything Woke Turns To Sleep
Brought to you by Bidenica
😂
Mostly I agree with your assessment, but the fact that we are still paying any attention to courts is that rule of law has been only partly lost. (It’s “mostly dead” as in The Princess Bride.) We are clawing our way back to some accountability, but we don’t know whether we will eventually get full accountability or whether they will succeed in putting us into enough chaos that they take over completely.
AG Garland: “January 6 was an unprecedented attack on the cornerstone of our system of government”
This is an opinion not backed up by fact.
I have taken an interest in the countries where the most coups have occurred since 1960. There have been certain common features like the involvement of some of the military, the use of guns, shooting, arson and destruction. None have been attempted by an unarmed crowd of peaceful protesters. Where large crowds have gathered calling on their leaders to address corruption and fraud like the Green Movement in Iran, these were not a coup. A coup is also not widely advertized as was the case in Jan 6 giving the government the opportunity to respond in a sensible way.
Jan 6 was a protest by people who believed that there had been massive voter fraud and wanted this properly and independently investigated. The authorities could have agreed to slightly delay the official presidential election announcement and do a brief targeted investigation. If they did and announced this to the gathered crowd before they moved into Capitol Building the whole situation could have been defused with no conflict, damages, injuries and loss of life. What happened looked to me far more like a provocation by bullies who then had an excuse to hit back at those being bullied.
Eggs-Ackley
It wasn’t opinion it was propaganda because Garland knows that Pelosi, the DNC and the FBI were behind instigating the protest into a riot!
Over 200 FBI Assets Involved in J6
https://rumble.com/v460kpo-over-200-fbi-assets-involved-in-j6-false-flag-tcn-tuckercarlson-maga-freedo.html
it was also a protest that was fueled by non uniformed saboteurs who engaged in inciting criminal actions to suspend the regular session of congress, such that it would be forced into emergency session where members who vote to “certify the election” in secrecy, by proxy even, without the requirement to observe and vote on debate clause elements such as their duties to suspend from making the certifications before a legal and formal review of debates about specific evidence of election fraud could be motioned to be heard on the floor…in full view of the American PEOPLE whom SUPPOSEDLY this congressional certification is convened TO RECOGNIZE AND TO SERVE.
it would ultimately become the CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY of Mike Pence to answer this duty. Mike Pence committed treason.
he will not be allowed to ride free for his crimes against the people even if his misconduct can be evaluated as full retard. He was in fact advised by sound constitutional scholars of high regard who could not offer him money, but the most important treasure any many can earn: honor.
he chose money. Mike two silver pieces pence.
a piece of shit
God Bless America
About time.
Will this also cut into the Bragg case of building and constructing a bond with a Federal Law.
It might!
Smelt in the Sacramento delta.
Exactly! Like 80′ of Sierra Mountain snowmelt deliberately drained into the Pacific Ocean!
The monkey business wasting water and denying it to citizens and farmers is an anti-human abomination.
The lawless Left will have its desolate wastelands at any cost in lives and liberty.
Pretending that the resultant desert will bloom under its benevolent hand.
Yes, when the desert runs out of sand under its benevolent hand (h/t Milton Friedman).
Merrick Garland’s appointed Bolshevik Prosecutor for Washington DC J6 cases…
Under Matthew Graves, the US Attorney’s Office declined to prosecute 67% of those arrested for crimes in DC, including 72% of misdemeanor arrests and 53% of felony arrests.[12][13]
12. “More Than Two-Thirds of the People Arrested in D.C. Are Never Charged”. Washington City Paper. March 15, 2023.
13. “D.C. U.S. attorney declined to prosecute 67% of those arrested. Here’s why”. The Washington Post. March 29, 2023.
External links
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_M._Graves
What’s with Coney-Barrett???
Not so Right-ist, nor Righteous.
It’s just Roberts attempting to show you that Supreme Court Justices are not politically biased. He had ACB and Jackson switch votes. It window dressing…
It’s just Kabuli Theater!
I suspect they got to her through her children. She has 7, all still in school K through University, one with Down’s Syndrome.
That is a lot of teachers, school administrators, peers, peer’s parents, etc. any of which could be entry points for some Leftist Activists to exert pressure.
I wonder what Sundance feels about this with respect to the Chevron case:
https://redstate.com/shipwreckedcrew/2024/06/29/fischer-v-united-states-a-tale-of-two-readings-all-may-not-be-what-it-seems-n2176146
This is a great clip on the Chevron Doctrine.
https://x.com/jimiuorio/status/1807116322427240785
I requested a ThreadReader link from you upthread so us non-X-ers can follow the thread you linked, can you help us out?
Saw you did that for us, thanks.
FYI – ICYMI, you can put a twit link into threadreader’s main page search box and find it if someone has created one for it 😉
“This breach of the Capital caused the members of the Congress to evacuate the Chamber and delayed the certification process”. This statement by Justice Robert’s is factually incorrect. In fact it expedited the certification process. Without the break in it would have taken a minimum of two days to two weeks to complete the certification process. Immediately before Congress halted deliberations a member of both houses requested deliberations in order to decide if the election was compromised. This according to House rules would have mandatorily caused a debate. However after Congress returned Pelosi instead of continuing normal proceedings declared a SPECIAL SESSION and all debate was canceled and only an up or down vote on the certification was permitted. Thus instead of deliberations about the irregularities of the election which would have taken several days at least the certification was voted on with no debate. Thus the Capitol break in didn’t delay proceedings it did the exact opposite.
Excellent observation.
Precisely why the Derps engineered their Fedsurrection.
Regitiger for the win!
I prayed every single day for almost 2 years before I laid out the information in that post.
the “work” remains unfinished. I never intended to finish the work myself. I just don’t have that much trust in my own ability to get it all the way correct. But the substance is complete..the basis is falsifiable/provable
I did not start this fire. I just digged through the ashes to understand how the coup happened.
it was a coup.
eventually (God willing, sooner than never) people will understand what happened.
I have moved away from the notion that things like this can be prevented and have now moved toward what can be done to solve these things when they do happen.
this is the tension of living a righteous life in a unrighteous world. How to make what ought to be, what is.
We are not God. We cannot make perfection. But we can pursue it.
I aim to pursue the vile corrupt criminal element within the United States Government with the power of the lion of truth. When we release this truth Lion, it does not merely defend itself as a symbol, it also eclipses the ill gotten gains of those who have betrayed the truth. There is justice from this apex truth predator. The unstoppable force of good must have teeth.
“YOU SHALL NOR BEAR FALSE WITNESS”
shall not, or else what?
many people forget what a commandment actually means. It isn’t just a passive rule or standard. It also means there are consequences. The Angel Michael for instance will be sent BY GOD to AVENGE and to form justice.
I am reminded of these things are we get closer to a national holiday where this nation recognizes our freedom from tyranny…a day of independence.
but have we escaped our new masters?
God Bless America
Same masters, Brother.
Glad to see you being regular again, what a time to be calling out the evil together, n’est-ce pas?
We will see what happens!
ACB sure has been on the wrong side of a few issues lately.
She is transforming into a Souter
‘Sheis no conservative…secret eftist no longer secret.
You should got read Shipwreck’s article in the federalist. The J6 ruling is not as good as being put out.
Saw it on Red State and it didn’t change my view at all of the significance of the SC ruling.
It would be extremely hard to argue and win a case as discussed as a possibility in the article, short of possibly those who went into Pelosi’s office or took her computer.
Admittedly, for those that as of yet haven’t gone to trial they could try to gen up some unrelated charge to go after the defendants with.
SCROTUS will never give us a true victory.
COULD have major ramifications. When I first read about Chevron being overturned I was hopeful for present and future situations, yet also mindful that the evil dimorats have NO respect for the rule of law. They WILL try to sneak whatever they can past the watchers.
I am actually more hopeful for the J6 victims, re the Fischer case.
A prime example of agency overreach is when OSHA tried to mandate COVID vaccine shots.
Those types of actions should no longer be possible.
👆
The first case out of the box may well be by health care workers who lost at SCOTUS because the Court held it was within the powers granted under the funding statute.
I think the administration finally repealed that mandate?
I hope those plaintiffs will circle back with a close examination.
And this may become very important if the DS tries for plandemic 2.0, with yet more mask and jab mandates.
On occasion, the Roberts Court, gets it right.
.
I haven’t been feeling like commenting much lately because after reading something such as the outrageous drivel emanating from Merrick Garland, the first thought that comes to my mind is along the lines of somebody please sh….
Anyway. Second thought here regarding the Chevron Doctrine is that when a statute truly is ambiguous, the ONLY appropriate court decision is to invalidate it (or the ambiguous part if reasonably severable), and throw it back to the legislature. We could do with a lot fewer laws and regulations.
.
We could do with a lot fewer laws and regulations.
Indeed, and much less deference to Derps.
Julie Kelly: Handful Of Judges Should Be Investigated And Brought Up On Impeachment Charges
“Smith is a Democrat party apparatchik, he knows there’s no consequences for him. There’s no consequences in court, that’s why they’re going after Judge Cannon. If he’s slapped down, he doesn’t care, because he’s going to go on to be a big hero to the left, the media, and the Democrat party.” (15min)
https://rumble.com/v54e2li-julie-kelly-the-real-hero-in-scotus-fischer-decision.html
Hughes: J6 Prisoners Lives Upended For Political Theater
https://rumble.com/v54e5w9-hughes-j6-prisoners-lives-upended-for-political-theater.html
Robert De Niro and Capitol police officers show up to courthouse with Biden campaign
*apnews.com/article/trump-de-niro-biden-insurrection-hush-money-78a33c5083a243e18f9fbd63ce9e8ddd
Ex-D.C. Cop Michael Fanone: Election-Denying Kari Lake Is a ‘Piece of Sh!t’
*yahoo.com/entertainment/ex-d-c-cop-michael-004348678.html
Build Hero Better
Members of Metro PD Special Op heckle former Officer Mike Fanone
“They called me a piece of sh!t and mockingly called me a great f*ing hero while clapping.”
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1600168579303104513.html
You ain’t black.
“In 2014, the District of Columbia settled a lawsuit filed against two D.C. Metro police officers for violating the civil rights of Michael Maddox, a black attorney working at the time in the legal department at Howard University. The city paid Maddox $175,000 in damages.
“One of the officers named in the lawsuit was Michael Fanone.”
RE: Chevron
If Trump were to win and proceed to administer administrative rulings that would not favor the left, does that mean it would make it harder for him? That it would have to get court approval?
In these cases that seem like wins, it is also good to see if it is sacrificing a bishop to checkmate the king.
Why would he issue any regulations at all?
Minimizing power to impose injustices by imperious Derps is entirely consistent with PDJT’s wholesale elimination of their self-created regulations empowering such injustices and abuse.
Obstruction is a vile term to be included in any law. Forms of obstruction such destroying evidence, perjury, threats or harassment are actions unto themselves and subsequently enumerated in USC 1512.
Obstruction (and its kissin’ cousin ‘disorderly conduct’) are tools the state gives itself to control the behavior of citizens when lawful orders cannot be used.
In the Fisher case Kenti Brown laid out the method to use to keep attacking Trump in the Smith case. The government can tie the case to ‘documents’ about the Electors and/or the ‘fake Electors’ and accuse Trump of obstruction with regards to those documents.
The Smith case if far from over!
Elon Musk submitted certiorari to the Supremes RE: that BS order to turn over Trump’s Twitter feed/DMs/acct info, forbidden to notify Trump, forced to pay hefty fines for delaying handover, AND GAGGED INTO SILENCE
If THAT ain’t standing, what is?
https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/social-media-giant-requests-supreme-court-reviews-process-jack-smith-used-get
https://www.ft.com/content/9823dd8c-0eae-41d9-83ab-f145817104cd
They can pretend Musk wasn’t harmed.
Standing is too easily abused and is not in the Constitution either.
Justice is thwarted by Justices shirking their duty whilst pretending to wisdom.
This only demonstrates how deep the evil is in Garland’s heart.
Another giant Supreme Court decision this year was to allow governments to eradicate homeless encampments using anti-camping regulations.
I don’t believe the doj will do anything. The j6ers will be waiting until Trump is in office.
In Megyn Kelly’s interview of Steve Bannon yesterday they marveled at how these very favorable SCOTUS rulings came ONE DAY after Biden’s DEBATE MELT DOWN. Kelly and Bannon agreed that these events feel providential. AGREED!