In a 14-page opinion and ruling today [SEE pdf HERE] four judges from the DC Circuit Court of Appeals deconstruct the previous ruling from their own court as well as the DC judge beneath them that gave Special Counsel Jack Smith access to President Trump Twitter account data and then enforced a non-disclosure order.
There are multiple layers to this story, but the substantive part is the scheme and the construct of how the Lawfare took place. There’s no way this was coincidental; I’ll explain why.
First, there are only 7 members on the full DC Circuit Court of Appeals. When the Twitter case to gain access to President Trump communication came to the appellate level, somehow all three of the most left-wing judges were assigned to hear the appeal.
An “en banc” review would have included the full 7 members. However, that review was made moot by the release of the information (a result of the appellate decision). The release itself was done with the use of a non-disclosure order, hiding the ruling in secrecy and keeping President Trump from knowing about it. Once the other four members of the DC CCA eventually found out about the case and the ramifications for ‘executive privilege’ their opinion lambasting their own court is released.
As noted from the panel, “the court here permitted a special prosecutor to avoid even the assertion of executive privilege by allowing a warrant for presidential communications from a third party and then imposing a nondisclosure order.”
The Circuit Court justices note that Jack Smith could have gone to the National Archives for the information as they held the same set of documents and information. However, Smith didn’t want to go that route because the National Archives would inform President Trump as customary and provide him the ability to assert executive privilege over any of the 32 Direct Messages requested.
Jack Smith didn’t want President Trump to know the prosecution was looking through his Twitter metadata and personal communication, so they went to district court under seal to file their search warrants in secrecy; then banning Twitter (the third party) from telling President Trump about it. The four justices from the DC Circuit Court of Appeals are furious the other three members of the court went along with this precedent setting usurpation of authority.
President Trump could not appeal any part of this process because he was unaware it was taking place. In essence, a star-chamber of secrecy was established and the majority on DC Circuit Court of Appeals is not happy about it.
Jack Smith gained access after Twitter lost the 3-judge Circuit Court appeal decision. So, an en banc full 7-member ruling is essentially moot. The information was released, and Smith had access without President Trump or the White House having any option to assert privilege.
…”While a Twitter account primarily consists of public tweets, it may also include some private material, such as direct messages between users, drafts, and personal metadata. In fact, the material produced by Twitter included several dozen direct messages written by a sitting President. The district court afforded no opportunity for the former President to invoke executive privilege before disclosure, and this court made no mention of the privilege concerns entangled in a third-party search of a President’s social media account. This approach directly contravenes the principles and procedures long used to adjudicate claims of executive privilege.” [pdf HERE]
The ruling provides no remedy other than public scrutiny and perhaps fuel for Florida Judge Aileen Cannon who already has Special Counsel Jack Smith on his heels after several rulings in the Mar-a-Lago documents case.
What the publicity does is highlight to the world just how politically motivated all of this aforementioned action really is. Lastly, what are the odds of the random 3-judge panel to approve it. Even the DC Circuit Court itself seems to imply this was a structured outcome, which is even more infuriating to the majority within the court.
“The ruling provides no remedy other than …”
“As noted from the panel, “the court here permitted a special prosecutor to avoid even the assertion of executive privilege by allowing a warrant for presidential communications from a third party and then imposing a nondisclosure order.”” … It makes me so angry … and let’s not forget the horrific treatment of the J6ers and Giuliani et al. – these judges if they can’t be fired – maybe they could be relocated – to the North Pole? … Trump at the end of his speech tonight mentioned his schedule – it’s brutal – rallies at night – and lawfare hearings by day … We need to pray for Trump and all the victims of the “Biden” indictments …
These judges need to be sanctioned and put on suspension. There should be no immunity from their personal choices to circumvent the law.
Impeachment!
Isn’t it odd that federal judges have absolute immunity for their actions but President Trump doesn’t!
Yes, but please tell me what process was used, what protocol was followed that out of 7 justices, it just so happened three progs were the 3 person panel.
Prosecutorial misconduct to the highest level. Criminal. A usurpation of power.
Can we all zoom out from this injustice and remember the stakes.
There are Trillions of dollars at stake and the lawfare folks have already proven they will stop at nothing to subjugate all the rest of us. WuFlu come to mind and the tanking of the best economy in my 63 year life.
An election, voting, a non=GOPe candidate: they are trying to bring all those things and therefore us under their thumb.
Old Mules are the only thing standing Their way..
Seems a visit from Peppermint is in order.
It’s not a ruling. It’s not even a dissent.
It’s framed as a “statement” to an en banc denial for rehearing.
Other courts may take mere notice of it as dicta. And that’s about it.
The DC Court of Appeals is as dysfunctional as the DC Circuit. Fully politicized at this point.
These fundamental privileges, as they directly impact the powers of the Executive, are going to require SCOTUS to resolve. If at all.
But it can be used on appeal to the SC.
Yes, so that will be the remedy as these 4 judges dissented the 3 others ruling and since they are the majority seems SCOTUS would concur. Course no real remedy. Damage done. Those 3 judges should be recalled and/or disbarred.
Surely the fruit of the poisonous tree cannot be used in any proceeding against Trump?
Not poisonous fruit. The 3 judges gave assent to Jack Smith.
But they conspired to deprive President Trump of his executive privilege. How were the three that would go along with this get chosen? Jack Smith is dirty and should go back to The Hague. They can have him.
They should be impeached, but the immunity judges claim for themselves needs to be readdressed by the Supreme Court. The idea that they can be protected from crimes such as conspiring to deprive President Trump of his rights needs to be stopped. Fair-minded people can see that the courts are corrupt and weaponized, just like the media. Obama’s army;.
They gave assent to the special prosecutor…..is jack smith a “special prosecutor” to begin with?
An illegally appointed one.
He was only to assist, not run the show.
That’s what I was wondering. Why wouldn’t Smith be prohibited from using any info that came about from those searches in his case?
These lower courts/judges are creating a mess for the Judicial Branch and these higher courts need to fix it.
The tree is not only poisoned it’s dead.
Well, that’s how it’s supposed to work but then on the other hand it’s akin to the “unringing of the bell.” Not sure how they can do that in this case soooo – the entire case needs to be tossed in the trash bucket and we need to get on with the restoration of our Country. Perhaps a few prosecutions here and there would make a great start.
No, there are 11 judges. The vote was not reported, but it appears to be 7-4 in favor of Jack Smith. These 4 attached a statement to the denial of review.
Who’ll disbar them? The same Association that disbarred Giuliani?
With every solution, the problem comes first – at least many of us are aware of the problem – what an unjust legal system
“with liberty and justice for all”???
As so many here have noted, maybe if we worked harder on the first part of the statement, i.e., “One nation, under God,” the path to what follows it would become clear.
Tell me why there is a DC court to begin with?
Good question.
IMO – to protect the interests of the DS/IC and political elites.
EYE bleach, please!!!!
I am so PISSED!!!!! But then you know that.
We expect nothing less!
💗
Me too. Right with you all the way!
Exactly. To hide the truth.
❤️
They are the Swamp’s own legal bodyguard.
So they did it to Trump but they can’t do it to Joebama. Got it.
Exactly – since they were called out on it. Very clever.
Case dumping.
Good luck with that. The U.S. Supreme Court turned a way a
bathroom case.
What is so difficult?
Biological males use the boy’s room
and biological girls use the girls room.
If in doubt, check the DNA!
SCOTUS is highly suspect and Trump appointees have been the worst offenders.
Not worse than Sotomayor’s stupid arse. Ketanji will ultimately be absurd too.
That’s a very good point about it being a “statement”, but can’t President Trump’s attorney’s turn this to their advantage somehow?
Can’t this statement be used to a) petition for a change in venue, b) evidence of prosecutorial misconduct, etc.?
Just as the courts provided no remedy to American voters when attorneys tried to present evidence of voting fraud in the election of 2020.
Somehow regular citizens don’t “have standing.”
Sorry, accidentally flagged. Please ignore.
when will justice slice through the necks of the evil doers?
Why elect a president? We got partsian judges here. We might just installed Jack Sh1t to be the president for life. s/
They, the DS have been doing this since the summer of 2015 and there is no let up, no actual fight against it. If DJT is not the President elect in November, and not inaugurated in January 2025, we will officially be a Banana Republic with no rights. Unless, we do what is required in order to keep the Constitutional Republic. Have we no Sons of Liberty, no Patriots?
JFK never should have allowed government employees to unionize. That created a sinister, organized hive mind operation within the ranks of our government and elective process.
And we tax payers are forced to pay them for this deep state takeover and takedowns of their “enemies”.
What a mess. Who made him do that?
1932 – FDR
Was that when the United States was turned into a corporation? If so, FDR caused some massive problems for our Republic.
Would you expect different from essentially a communist working hard to pretend to be American.
United States of America was incorporated in 1871
Arguably, 1871.
Damage was done in 1913 – 16th, 17th & Fed Reserve Act.
After 1929 stock market crash and 1932 election for FDR – bankruptcy and all private gold seized and turned over to FED. 1971 – Nixon decoupled dollar from gold.
Those are the primary events.
It certainly manages to work for their own interests above the interests of We, the People.
Federal judges, DOJ attorneys and FBI Agents are not in any labor union.
I believed that ship has sailed.
Eleven judges.
IN D.C. no Less…
68.35 sq mi
Yep. My question exactly.
Revise due to water bodies.
Shining a light on how belief in another long-revered institution can be destroyed, weaponization.
1962 – JFK allowed government employees to unionized. This created a separate group of citizens and voters – those with a direct and immediate interest in election outcomes – which candidate will pay us the most and make sure we never get fired before we get out life time pensions.
We are now up to 22 million government employees – which is a huge internal force now working against us.
1932 – FDR
This is why we need to take our collective ball and…go HOME.
Well that needs to f ing be revoked, the life time pensions. Congress’s too.
Along with all those laws that just apply to the tax payers but not the elected officials part. If they have a fortune as a result of it, claw it back in the name of the tax payers.
We have a 40T overdraft at the bank. Got to start covering it with the stolen funds and this is as good a place to start as any.
Civil RICO when the times comes.
Worse than bankruptcy. All assets seized and put out in the streets.
Remember that Congress voted in two term limits afterward. FDR was still warm.
Where does it say that Congress can term limit a President?
Pissed still.
In all honesty, that was an Amendment that not only has congressional approval but has to be ratified by 3/4 of the states.
22nd IIRC.
And BS. How does one entity have power over the other branch? Is this a circular firing squad? Trying to wrap a head.
OK, so I accept your amendment argument. Where are the term limits for the other two branches?
I know, some people are blond, so sometimes that brain just does not work.
Legislative:
No limits on Congress.
House – 2 year terms
Senate – 6 year terms.
Judiciary (federal):
Judges and Justices – lifetime appointments
Understood. where are the equal branches of government?
These are not equal.
And Those House and Senate terms are re-electable. No limits.
Can we remedy that?
It would take another amendment. Have fun.
There needs to be a process to prosecute these DC judges for their unconstitutional conduct. They need to be criminally charged, removed from the bench and imprisoned. Washington DC has become one gigantic, unconstitutional criminal conspiracy against the U.S. Constitution and the people of the United States of America.
These people are treasonous criminals and have no business remaining in positions of judicial power.
Military tribunal.
It’s the ONLY way!
🎯
Once convicted, public hangings. Do PPV and apply to the national debt.
Judges are government employees – the 22 million government employees we have today is the force working on the inside and against us.
And, WE pay them…..
Since Congress Never reads these 20,000-30,000 page bills they pass,can’t someone (with a set) just drop in a couple laws in the middle. And yes I’m being serious.
I get what you’re saying but it works both ways, and it made me wonder if AI could be put to use in finding the hidden landmines.
Yes. Impeachment.
The remedy is impeachment and removal from office if convicted. Then, as in Trumps <almost> analagous position, an investigation and possible civil or criminal charges, if indited by a grand jury.
Problem is, they are held to the same impeachment standard as a president, ‘treason, bribery, high crimes or misdomeanors’.
Simply being wrong on a judicial opinion is not, I don’t think, an impeachable offense.
I think his best defense here is to insist that all such evidence be suppressed and unusable in any court because it is the fruit of a poison vine, since the warrant/subpeona is clearly unconstitutional and a violation of due process, to say nothing of a disregard of presidential authority, ala disregard of executive privilege.
Just a poor boy’s opinion.
Lawfare has a decades long history.
Anybody know Jackboot’s neck size ?
Close enough…
Impeachments pending?
Washington Dc criminals just being criminals…are there ANY judges in the system who are NOT corrupt?
This feels different.
Yes, different like a prosecutor phoning judges telling those judges what is needed to railroad a defendant and how the judges can help.
I saw a video once where a 20 something said she created the algorithm to select the judges, ‘randomly’ in many jurisdictions based on the case. Leftwing or Conservative.
LOL!!!!
Everyone can have plausible deniability.
These judges, federal prosecutors and their staff all went to a very small and select few law schools.
Their own little secret society with the head nods and handshakes to signal like-mindedness.
IFTTT the old school way.
Ferral Judges?
Yes.
Judge shopping been going on longer than you or anyone on this forum been alive…
Yes, this gal was saying that she could arrange it through programming. No one needed to have fingers on it. Just put in the case and who was in it, and the algorithm gave you the judge of your dreams.
Damn few. None in DC
Iowa seemed to be OK with all but three counties. Maybe.
To be determined, this is the winnowing stage in the process.
Is it reasonable to say that Jack Smith along with lawfare tactics and these three judges made an attempt to obliterate the entire rule of law in the land?
And on show?
The sequel (Appeals Court)was perhaps involved in the prequel and is now feigning indignation when Jack’s already robbed the cookie jar.
Indeed.
Without doubt, by asserting control over the exec branch.
Which apparently under which we no longer have a Constitutional Republic.
I’ve long felt the Miami case would be the first one tossed. This is ammunition to have the ENTIRE case thrown out. The Appellate court is giving Judge Cannon top cover. They can clearly see that the Jack Smith “prosecution” is an attempt to railroad the defendant. The contortions that Jack Smith and the Lawfare team had to make in the legal system to bring these charges include all the lengths required to conceal their actions.
It’s a bit like how they never talk about Trump telling 1/6 protesters to march peacefully and go home, and they leave out his offer of military protection to Nancy Pelosi. (She has never been required to publicly answer that question, and there is a reason for this. Jack Smith’s case falls apart. They need this revelation to come out a LOT later after the maximum damage has been inflicted on Trump.)
Executive Privilege (and the PRA) are why Trump had no obligation whatsoever to turn documents over to the DOJ.
Judge Cannon can clearly see this for what it is. I think she’s waiting for one of the appeals to give her that much more cover. e.g. Presidential Immunity.
Spot on, H!
The most important case since Day One!
They lose there, and Trump can release the contents of the binder and THEY ARE TOAST, BURNT!
Not sure. The GA case has more room for latitude in idiotically decided some sort of criminality.
Does not have the same importance nor impact as getting the information from that BINDER into the public view and court system.
NOTHING and none of these other cases have that magnitude of importance!
Question for any Wolverine lawyers in the room. Since the court has determined that the evidence was improperly obtained, if any of it was presented to the grand jury in DC, is that sufficient grounds for the indictment be tossed?
Good question.
What a piece of work.
Do we know Judge Cannon is not going to betray the constitution in the end?
No.
No, but from the little I’ve seen (not a lawyer), she seems to recognize the basic bs of the case. Her “special master” ruling got blocked on the wildly outrageous idea that the DOJ can say “national security” and nobody can question it or review it.
At the same time, however, the DOJ’s argument that NOBODY can question their national security labels stems from basic constitutional separation of powers.
The very same Executive Privilege enjoyed x100 by PDJT. If nobody can question DOJ/NSD, which is a minor subsidiary bureaucracy under POTUS, the PDJT and his document ownership cannot be disputed. Period.
Cannon knows this. I think she will do the right thing.
This maybe even more infuriating to the majority within the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, but I bet a dollar to a donut they do nothing about it.
DC Circuit Court of Appeals
THERE is your oxymoron.
They can’t do anything when it comes to this specific issue.
But here’s the thing: the court will hear appeals about Presidential Immunity and Executive Privilege. They’ve just fired a warning shot at the trial judge that these bs kangaroo court tactics are going to die at the Appellate Court level.
Keep in mind that Jack Smith just begged SCOTUS to jump over the appeals court. Why did the Lawfare traitors do that?
Because they will LOSE. This ruling/opinion is exactly why they want rushed rulings and want to jump over or maneuver around precedent. It’s also why SCOTUS gave Jack Smith a terse, one sentence, “denied”. They also know he is doomed.
And there you go. Smith is scared of a full appeals court. He’s hoping on a compromised or intimidated SCOTUS to her his way.
Very prescient of you, again!
H
You’re on a roll tonight. Them brain cells are on overdrive.
It’s easy to forget just how much Trump remade the Judiciary during his term. Not with ideologues, but with rigorous judges with impeccable credentials.
Those judges are now in a position to destroy Lawfare.
From your lips to God’s ears…
The ‘Rushed’ part is the tell.
Sorry Rush.
” Infiltration instead of invasion ”
Justice will not be served untill the house is cleaned of the satanic infestation that is called the Democrat Party.
Do you really believe there isn’t a huge % of DC republicans involved or aware?
Rino’s yea, but there are more good Rep’s than bad.
If so, we’d never know it as they stand up for nothing.
If it makes you sleep better at night.
“99% of the FBI agents are good people.”
lmfao.
I used to think that. I’ve now reestimated to 50% or so.
Lower your standards. 😄
Uh, no.
no way
You sure?
99% of everyone in government are paid off and compromised.
This just reenforces the need for the “2024 Constitutional Republic Mandate” as a plank in President Trump’ platform.
Using his oath, he must immediately de-authorize and disband the unconstitutional administrative-state in the executive branch.
Disbar the three seditious judges. Throw out Jack Smith’s case and investigate whether it was ever appropriate to make him a “special counselor” in the first place. It’s time to start dismantling the communist revolution against the US.
Anyone, with a modicum of intelligence and decency, knows that what has been leveled against Trumpus Magnas is total bullshiticus.
🇺🇸MAGA 2024🇺🇸
Was this Latin?
Yes.
Maganus Latinus, or something! 😆
Well, for once I actually have a shocked face.
When they invaded President Trump’s beautiful home on August 8, 2022 I was literally sick to my stomach. Everything they have done since that time has been the most egregious, and yes embarrassing on a world stage, travesty of Justice.
FJB And his cohorts in every single one of these cases against President Trump are traitors to this country, its founders, and our Constitution.
“Jack Smith didn’t want President Trump to know the prosecution was looking through his Twitter metadata and personal communication”
Not just the ‘metadata’, but all the data.
I thought Democommunists are self proclaimed kind and compassionate, open and transparent.
I wonder how many people knew that if they composed a tweet, then deleted it, that the tweet was saved and could be used against them later?
That platform is a physical manifestation of pure evil.
These actions cannot go unpunished.
Required a conspiracy and that’s not debatable.
They are shaking in their shoes…justice will catch up to all of them, especially these miscreants on the DC Circuit and appellate court. “You can run on for a long time…”
District of Corruption Judges and Juries. All Federal cases must be moved. And yes, free the J6 hostages.
The only court that should be in DC is SCOTUS and a traffic court.
Force Feds to try their prosecutions only in the state and locale of their target.
Dilute their power, minimize their ability to punish through process, eliminate the advantage of a carefully curated Communist coterie of corrupt prosecutors and judges and underlings.
Destroy the tyranny of the District of Corruption.
100% agree.
Reparations for J6ers.
“The Constitution authorizes the impeachment of federal judges, but it nowhere says that they can be removed only through impeachment…Congress clearly can adopt measures to help the chambers impeach and convict. But Congress can go further and adopt statutes that remove judges upon proof of judicial misbehavior.”
Will Congress act on this kind of misbehavior by federal judges? If not, then this behavior will continue.
https://www.yalelawjournal.org/forum/removing-federal-judges-without-impeachment
Niagra, Thank you for the link. We the people need to put a stop to this corrupt behavior! I will be contacting my US representative to discuss impeachment proceedings.
Can federal judges be transferred to a different district ?
IIRC, Congress can open and close courts.
Don’t forget what Trump did with the circuit courts. Some of the biggest troublemaker courts were targeted. The 9th Circus was defanged, for example. Biden hasn’t been able to undo that.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/12/9/20962980/trump-supreme-court-federal-judges
A second Trump term next year would just obliterate the courts for a decade or more.
And your link says that judges “shall hold their Offices during good Behavior.” Is this good behavior?
Any more questions about the judicial system compromised and rigged, especially DC?
3 judge panel voting 3-0 to approve anything, is rare.
Not when those specific judges were ‘selected’ instead of drawn at random.
The ramifications of this are STUNNING.
🎯
Aaaand who spent most of her career working within this court?
Mary McCord. She’s the fixer and must be neutralized (in a non violent way of course).
^^^^^^^^ 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥
EXACTLY! 👍
Nice observation!
Oh, my. I may faint!
First, let’s find out who Mary actually is.
Been trying off and on for a LONG time.
Bio has been scrubbed / rewritten no less than 4 times I know of in the recent past.
What I have pieced together is that there is a strong plausibility that she(?) is the progeny or related (at a minimum) to James McCord, lead CIA agent on Nixon Watergate infamy.
He was reputedly acclaimed to be the “right hand man” of the director and/or Allen Dulles.
No one knows of who her parents are.
Have had the same trouble. Wipeout.
Malcolm mcCord…
Expound please. Haven’t heard that name.
Very curious!
Or are you making a joke?
I need a lead. Been working on this for a while.
😞 sorry to get your hopes up. Was for her/his gender.( Adam’s apple) As a male, he would be a,MALCOLM. Keep 💪 working…😉
Mary is Marty.
She might melt if she looks in a mirror.
Keep a cross on your neck.
We are all getting a graduate level education why Big Government(D) and the Deep State (D) is antithetical to everything we hold dear in this country.
Democrats today are the party of the deep state and the massive government employee unions. They must be stopped.
This needs to be laid at the feet of John Robert’s, he who says there are no Democrat or Republican judges. And how can this case be precedent setting if it was done illegally?
I just sent the link to this thread to my congressional representatives, asking them what they are going to do about it, because now we know beyond a shadow of a doubt that President Trump is being railroaded.
I suggest everyone else do the same.
Amen Brother!!! Thank you!
Yes.. Balls and strikes. (Roll eyes.) It could be precedent setting in that it give an example for reason to overturn/throw out bad precedent. Deferring to bad precedent compounds the error.
And the turds came up dry, or we’d have already seen the leakage.
So Judge Chutkan and Jack Smith broke the law of the Constitution, specifically Art II and the path laid out by the Presidential Records Act and upon appeal the 3 judges broke the law also.
Speaker Johnson where are you? Impeachment is the only legal remedy right?
Pretty much.
The ruling does provide no remedy.
But wow does it provide sunlight!
right up there with one of Lindsey’s strongly worded letters, or Rooster’s outrage, or Jim Jordans tongue lashings.
Somebody gon’ git hurt.
https://nypost.com/2024/01/16/news/court-wont-rehear-case-that-let-special-counsel-comb-trump-twitter-account/
For future reference remember this sentence.
” (Everything the court allows on Trump will be applied to all living and probably dead ex presidents)”
The most important precedent last year, the one NOBODY is talking about, is that ex Presidents are now fair game.
Always remember the “Nuclear Option” in the Senate. Harry Reid used it, and got some short term gain, and then Republicans got power and used it on Democrats like a broom handle on a constipated monkey.
Sometimes setting a precedent comes back to haunt you. The courts are likely to agree with Trump on Presidential Immunity simply to protect OBAMA.
Imagine the next President opening an investigation into Black Jesus’ coordination of the Antifa/BLM terrorist attacks in 2020…or the IRS targeting of Conservatives…or the utterly fraudulent Russia investigation. That was an attempted coup d’etat. Ain’t no statute of limitations on treason…
” Imagine the next President opening an investigation into Black Jesus ”
Exactly! Trump retrobution incoming.
Who could see this coming?
Haley turns fire on Trump as GOP primary shifts to New Hampshire
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/01/16/haley-new-hampshire-campaign-00135915
…Still, her offensive exposes her to significant risk — not only in the primary, where she is polling “double digits” behind Trump, but in a GOP where, if the former U.N. ambassador has any future, she cannot afford to alienate whole swaths of conservatives…
Risk and alienation mean nothing when your goal is not so much to become the party’s candidate but to eliminate President Trump.
One of my favorite Talking Heads hits.
Here’s how I feel about leftist judges:
Somehow the judges are being hand picked to hear conservative cases. This process is being manipulated. imho
Any thoughts, or statistical info out there?
Grateful that Sundance can explain this in layman’s language.
This is true banana republic stuff.
I am still savoring Trump’s historic win in Iowa.
I’m looking forward to his next win in
New Hampshire and then Haley’s home state of South Carolina.
Wasn’t her ‘home state’ some unpronouncible place in the Subcontinet? 😉
A moot point at present, even with the other four judges from the DC Circuit Court of Appeals unhappy about what Jack Smith and the three (most leftwing) judges have done, wouldn’t you say?
And there is NO process or method to prevent it happening in the future.
“Structured outcomes” are 100% unconstitutional. Shitcan Chutcan!
Sunlight is a great disinfectant. Keep praying that the Lord, the ultimate champion of Truth, will force all things into the light and that those who have dug a pit to catch the innocent will find that they’ve only dug a trap for themselves.
Retribution or in simple terms, vengeance, does not have to start at the top of the political pecking order and for democrats that would be Obama. Vengeance can and ought to be started at the lowest levels where it will go largely unnoticed at the national level. Vengeance is the War of the Flea. Partisans can and should make life miserable for the lowest level enablers, the local party members, elected and appointed officials, donors, board members, even relatives. Refuse to buy their products and services, call them out at public meetings, cross party lines and vote against them where possible. Give their businesses bad reviews. These are all Flea bites but look what fleas did to Budweizer. We are fleas and we bite where the dog can’t scratch until the dog is dead. Now, be the Flea, go bite a local liberal.
Is there a legal remedy for this type of judicial malpractice? Can judges be reprimanded, suspended, or sanctioned?
Surely there is a legal remedy for this!
Yes, there is. It is called the Bar Association. File a complaint against the judge and, theoretically, they can sanction the judge (or lawyer) up to disbarment. But don’t hold your breath waiting.
It makes it easier for SCOTUS to knock him down later down. Or the DC Appeals court, if they so incline (they might).
At what point does someone get disbarred, prosecuted, sued or fired for what is constantly shown as malicious prosecution?
What’s it going to take?
“Provides no remedy”…..well of course.
What was Mr. Smith looking for in Trump’s Twitter files? If anything improper could have been found it would have been leaked. So, nothing improper was found. Again we find Trump is an honest, law abiding man.
One one hand, there has to be a recourse in terms of legal proceedings against all the lawyers doing the illegal work of trampling on the constitutional rights of the former President and a private citizen. On the other hand, nothing materially damaging seems to have come out of this witch hunt so far, except that this has riled up even more fence-sitters to go all in on Trump. A really huge tidal wave will clear out this sewer and the swamp that is DC. And it may very well happen. At least Mary McCord seems to think so.
Except the millions paid to lawyers.
….and taxpayers are paying for this $hit show.
Demand a refund from their personal accounts (less pensions, they lost those).
Waiting on this to be the lead story on lame stream media…
That’s hilarious.
What do you do when even the courts are corrupt beyond repair? How long has it been thus and we made our excuses when we heard?
Remember: Merrick Garland doesn’t mind when large, angry crowds gather outside the judges homes. I wonder what these plutocrats would think if 5 or 10 thousand constitutionalist patriots showed up in their neighborhoods, with first and second amendment rights on full display?
End up in front of these idiots. They might bring back Beryl’s sorry ass to hear about it.
The better question is what criminal prosecutions can be run against Garland in Trump 47 after Trump fires all the US Attorneys and appoints the meanest a-hole prosecutors in America to go after regime elements?
What, exactly, are Democrats planning to do when we replace FBI leadership with MAGA sheriffs from across America who are directed to root out and destroy the Obamaites?
Every time someone points out all the prosecutions of President Trump as a reason he should not be nominated or elected, I point to the PERSECUTIONS of President Trump as a reason he should be nominated and elected and why I’m voting for him.